Ornaments Rubric

The "Ornaments Rubric" is found just before the beginning of Morning Prayer in the Book of Common Prayer of the Church of England. It runs as follows:

"THE Morning and Evening Prayer shall be used in the accustomed Place of the Church, Chapel, or Chancel; except it shall be otherwise determined by the Ordinary of the Place. And the Chancels shalt remain as they have done in times past.
"And here is to be noted, that such Ornaments of the Church, and of the Ministers thereof, at all Times of their Ministration, shall be retained, and be in use, as were in this Church of England, by the Authority of Parliament, in the Second Year of the Reign of King Edward the Sixth."

The interpretation of the second paragraph was debated when it first appeared and became a major issue towards the end of the 19th century during the conflicts over what vestments and ceremonies were legal in the Church of England.

History and interpretation

The rubric first appears in the Elizabethan revision of the Book of Common Prayer in 1559 and was retained in the later 1604 revision under James I. The second paragraph is essentially an extract from the penultimate section of the Elizabethan Act of Uniformity (1559 – 1 Elizabeth I,c.2) and breaks off in the middle of a sentence. The act itself provided that:

"... such ornaments of the Church and of the ministers thereof shall be retained and be in use as were in this Church of England by the authority of Parliament in the Second Year of the Reign of King Edward the Sixth shall be retained and be in use, until other order shall be therein taken by the Queen's Majesty with the advice of her commissioners appointed and authorized under the great Seal of England for ecclesiastical causes, or of the metropolitan of this realm; ..."[1]

Until June 1549 the Sarum Rite Mass (a version of the Roman Rite) was celebrated in Latin, with certain insertions in English.[n 1]

The ornaments of the ministers would have been the traditional Eucharistic vestments used in that Rite: albs, tunicles, dalmatics, copes, chasubles, maniples, mitres et cetera. The text of the 1549 Rite is quite explicit and reads for the ministration of the Holy Communion "the Priest shall put upon him...a white Albe plain, with a vestment or Cope. And where there be many Priests or Decons"..."shall have upon theim likewise"..."Albes, with tunicles."[2] The wording in the 1559 Prayer Book Preface to Morning Prayer, reads"...the minister at the time of the Communion, and at all other times in his ministration shall use such ornaments as were in use by authority of Parliament in the second year of the Reign if Edward the Sixth according to the Act of Parliament set forth in the beginning of thys book." The wording of the Rubric is an order, not an option.

The "second year" referred to in the Act of 1559 began on 28 January 1548, and the Act approving the introduction of the first Book of Common Prayer was approved by Parliament on 21 January 1549. While it has been argued that the Act legalises the Roman Catholic vestments which were actually in use in the second year, most authorities accept that the Act refers to the vestments ordered in the first Edwardine Prayer Book of 1549[n 2] even though they were only required as from June 1549.[3] However, such an argument ignores the fact that the Ornaments Rubric was inserted in the Prayer Book of 1559 (as once of the concessions to Catholic feelings in order to get the Act of Uniformity passed by the Lords) and refers to the ornaments of the churches and ministers as in use in 1548 or more specifically and restrictively ordered in 1549 (as some have argued)![4]

If this was not the intent in 1559 the language should have been changed to explicate what vestments and ornaments were permissible, if not albs, tunicles, dalmatics, copes, chasubles, maniples, miters, et cetera which ones - gown and surplice only? The insertion of the Ornament Rubric, the addition of the Words of Administration at time of Communion (stating a belief in the Real Presence with a particular definition) from the First to the Second Prayer and the Adoption of the Prayer Book of 1552 suggests that Queen, a moderate non-ideological Protestant, wanted the celebration of the Holy Communion to look like a Mass[5] Also, if she had had her way the clergy would have been celibate since she detested married clergy.

On 30 April 1559, it was "glossed" (interpreted) by Dr Sandys, successively bishop of Worcester (1559), London (1570) and York (1575),[6] to mean that "we shall not be forced to use them, but that others in the mean time shall not convey them away, but that they may remain for the Queen."[7] Later in 1559, the Queen issued her Injunctions, one of which required the churchwardens to deliver to "our visitors" an inventory of "vestments, copes or other ornaments, plate, books and especially of grails, couchers, legends, processions, hymnals, manuals, portuals and such like, appertaining to their church."[8] The policy was to wean the Church from the outward trappings of the Catholic past by permission to use them until such time that the clergy, almost 100% Catholic, could be replaced by new men over time. Some parishes complied, others did not. Next year after learning many of the parishes were vandalizing their ornaments, she tried to reverse her policy somewhat. In 1566, the metropolitan (Archbishop Parker) issued his "advertisements" ordering the use of the surplice and in cathedrals and collegiate churches the cope.[9] The Canons of 1604, passed with strict conformity to legal procedures and legally binding with minor modifications till well into the 20th century, enforced this same line.[10]

It wasn't until the end of the century that the last of the ornaments of old were finally done away with everywhere (though some survived hidden away as in St. John's College, Oxford). However, by this time a large section of the 'new' clergy had re-discover the Catholic heritage, the cuckoo in the nest (A Protestant theology, programme within Catholic structure that rejected Calvinist predestinarian theology, emphasized the role of the sacraments esp. the Eucharist and a reexamination the early Church writers instead of Reformers[11] The result of which was to strengthen their resolve not to give into Puritan demands. The strong Catholic substrate in the Prayer Book was intact, but not the ornaments associated with it. The issue about these would re-surface in the mid-19th century in the Ritualist Movement.

For about one hundred years, starting in the middle of the 19th century, the legal interpretation of the rubric was disputed.[12] Anglo-Catholics pointed to it to justify their restoration of the traditional Eucharistic vestments of western Christianity in the Anglican Communion, whereas Evangelicals insisted that further order was taken in the Injunctions of 1559, the "Advertisements" of 1566 and the Canons of 1604 and therefore the only legal vestments were choir habit together with the cope in Cathedrals and collegiate churches.[13] The use of the disputed vestments became undoubtedly legal in the Church of England with the passing of the 1969 Canons, but these stated that no particular doctrinal significance was attached to them.[14]

gollark: I think what this means is "a substantial fraction of programmers will soon be obsoleted"
gollark: If Java is not allowed, simply implement it.
gollark: Next code guessing, someone should totally write raw JVM bytecode.
gollark: osmarkslisp™ can sort a 100-item list in *seconds*.
gollark: Which is why I said concisional apioids rather than brevity.

See also

Notes and References

Notes

  1. From 1547, the Epistle and Gospel on Sundays and Holy Days; and from March 1548 the inclusion of devotions between the consecration and the reception of communion very similar to those used in the 1549 book.(Procter and Frere, pp.35ff)
  2. In summary: plain white alb, with a vestment (meaning chasuble) or cope and in the case of a bishop, the rochet.

References

  1. Bray p.334
  2. Brad Thompson, Liturgies of the Western Church, 1962. p. 246
  3. Blunt & Phillimore p.116
  4. Christopher Haigh, English Reformations, 1993, pp. 240-241 ISBN 978-0-19-822162-3; Diarmid MacCullough, The Later Reformation in England, 1547-1603, 1990 p. 26 ISBN 0-333-69331-0
  5. Haigh, p. 241
  6. ODCC "Sandys"
  7. Procter and Frere, p.105 note 2
  8. Bray p.344
  9. ODCC "Advertisements, Book of"
  10. Neill, p.84
  11. McDiarmid MacCullough, The Later Reformation in England, 1547-1603, pp. 78-79 ISBN 0-333-69331-0
  12. Neill p.268
  13. Dyson Hague pp.36,37
  14. "Canon B8". Church of England. Retrieved 11 July 2012.

Bibliography
  • Blunt, John Henry & Phillimore, Walter G.F. The Book of Church Law Rivingtons, London (4th Ed. with corrections and editions -1885)
  • Bray, Gerald. Documents of the English Reformation James Clarke & Co, Cambridge UK, 1994
  • Neill, Stephen. Anglicanism Pelican, London 1960 (revised Edition)
  • Hague, Dyson Through the Prayer Book Church Book Room Press, London 1948
  • ODCC = Cross, F.L. & Livingstone, E.A. Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 2nd Ed, OUP, Oxford 1974
  • Procter and Frere. A New History of the Book of Common Prayer, MacMillan and Co. London 1902
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.