Korean Armistice Agreement

The Korean Armistice Agreement (Korean: 한국휴전협정, Chinese: 朝鲜停战协定) is the armistice that brought about a complete cessation of hostilities of the Korean War. It was signed by U.S. Army Lieutenant General William Harrison, Jr. representing the United Nations Command (UNC), North Korean General Nam Il representing the Korean People's Army (KPA), and the Chinese People's Volunteer Army (PVA).[1] The armistice was signed on 27 July 1953, and was designed to "ensure a complete cessation of hostilities and of all acts of armed force in Korea until a final peaceful settlement is achieved."[2]

For the 2018 agreement, see Panmunjom Declaration.

Korean Armistice Agreement
Delegates of both belligerent sides signing the Korean Armistice Agreement in P'anmunjŏm, marking the beginning of the still-existing ceasefire between the two Koreas
TypeArmistice
Signed27 July 1953
LocationP'anmunjŏm, Korea
Signatories/ William K. Harrison
Nam Il
Peng Dehuai
Parties United Nations Command
Korean People's Army
Chinese People's Volunteer Army
LanguagesEnglish, Korean, Chinese

During the 1954 Geneva Conference in Switzerland, Chinese Premier and foreign minister Zhou Enlai suggested that a peace treaty should be implemented on the Korean peninsula. However, the US secretary of state, John Foster Dulles, did not accommodate this attempt to achieve such a treaty. A final peace settlement has never been achieved.[3] The signed armistice established the Korean Demilitarized Zone (DMZ), the de facto new border between the two nations, put into force a cease-fire, and finalized repatriation of prisoners of war. The DMZ runs close to the 38th parallel and has separated North and South Korea since the Korean Armistice Agreement was signed in 1953.

South Korea never signed the Armistice Agreement, due to President Syngman Rhee's refusal to accept having failed to unify Korea by force.[4][5] China normalized relations and signed a peace treaty with South Korea in 1992. In 1994, China withdrew from the Military Armistice Commission, essentially leaving North Korea and the UN Command as the only participants in the armistice agreement.[6][7] In 2011, South Korea stated that North Korea had violated the armistice 221 times.[8]

Background

By mid-December 1950, the United States was discussing terms for an agreement to end the Korean War.[9] The desired agreement would end the fighting, provide assurances against its resumption, and protect the future security of UNC forces.[10] The United States asked for a military armistice commission of mixed membership that would supervise all agreements.[9] Both sides would need to agree to "cease the introduction into Korea of any reinforcing air, ground or naval units or personnel... and to refrain from increasing the level of war equipment and material existing in Korea."[9] The U.S. wished to create a demilitarized zone that would be roughly 20 miles (32 km) wide.[9] The proposed agreement would also address the issue of prisoners of war which the U.S. believed should be exchanged on a one-for-one basis.[9]

While talk of a possible armistice agreement was circulating, in late May and early June 1951, the President of the Republic of Korea (ROK, South Korea) Syngman Rhee opposed peace talks. He believed the ROK should continue to expand its army in order to march all the way to the Yalu River and completely unify the nation.[5] The UNC did not endorse Rhee's position.[5] Even without UNC support, Rhee and the South Korean government attempted to mobilize the public to resist any halt in the fighting short of the Yalu River.[11] Other ROK officials supported Rhee's ambitions and the National Assembly of South Korea unanimously passed a resolution endorsing a continued fight for an "independent and unified country."[11] At the end of June, however, the Assembly decided to support armistice talks,[11] although President Rhee continued to oppose them.[12]

Like Syngman Rhee, North Korean leader Kim Il-sung also sought complete unification. The North Korean side was slow to support armistice talks and only on 27 June 1951 – seventeen days after armistice talks had begun – did it change its slogan of "drive the enemy into the sea" to "drive the enemy to the 38th parallel."[13] North Korea was pressured to support armistice talks by its allies the People's Republic of China and the Soviet Union, whose support was vital to enabling North Korea to continue fighting.

Armistice discussions
The site of negotiations in 1951

Talks concerning an armistice started 10 July 1951,[14] in Kaesŏng, a North Korean city in North Hwanghae Province near the South Korean border.[15] The two primary negotiators were Chief of Army Staff General Nam Il, a North Korean deputy premier, and United States Vice Admiral Charles Turner Joy.[16] After a period of two weeks, on 26 June 1951, a five-part agenda was agreed upon[17] and this guided talks until the signing of the armistice on 27 July 1953. The items to be discussed were:

  1. Adoption of an agenda.
  2. Fixing a military demarcation line between the two sides so as to establish a demilitarized zone as a basic condition for the cessation of hostilities in Korea.
  3. Concrete arrangements for realization of a ceasefire and armistice in Korea, including the composition, authority and functions of a supervisory organization for carrying out the terms of a truce and armistice.
  4. Arrangements relating to prisoners of war.
  5. Recommendations to the governments of the countries concerned on both sides.[17]
Korean Armistice Agreement in English; Records of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, Record Group 218; National Archives at College Park, College Park, MD [available through the National Archives Catalog (NAID: 6852876)

]

After the agenda was decided, talks proceeded slowly. There were lengthy intervals between meetings. The longest gap between discussions started on 23 August 1951,[17] when North Korea and its allies claimed that the conference site in Kaesŏng had been bombed. North Korea requested the UNC conduct an immediate investigation, which concluded there was evidence a UNC aircraft had attacked the conference site. The evidence, however, appeared to be manufactured. The Communists subsequently refused to permit an investigation during daylight hours.[18] Armistice talks did not start again until 25 October 1951.[14] The U.S. would not allow further discussion to take place in Kaesŏng.[19] Panmunjom, a nearby village in Kyŏnggi Province, close to both North and South Korea, was chosen as the new location for deliberations. This was conditional on responsibility for protection of the village being shared by both powers.[20][21]

Colonel-level discussions between the US and North Korean militaries on 11 October 1951

A major, problematic negotiation point was prisoner of war (POW) repatriation.[22] The Communists held 10,000 POWs and the UNC held 150,000 POWs.[9] The PVA, KPA, and UNC could not agree on a system of repatriation because many PVA and KPA soldiers refused to be repatriated to the north,[23] which was unacceptable to the Chinese and North Koreans.[24] In the final armistice agreement, signed on 27 July 1953, a Neutral Nations Repatriation Commission, chaired by Indian general K. S. Thimayya, was set up to handle the matter.[25]

In 1952, the United States elected a new president, Dwight D. Eisenhower, and on 29 November 1952 the president-elect went to Korea to investigate what might end the Korean War.[26] With the United Nations' acceptance of India's proposed Korean War armistice,[27] the KPA, the PVA, and the UNC ceased fire with the battle line approximately at the Kansas line, a line of U.N. positions north of the 38th parallel which had been established in Operation Rugged.[28] Upon agreeing to the armistice, the belligerents established the Korean Demilitarized Zone (DMZ), which has since been patrolled by KPA, ROKA, United States, and Joint UNC forces. Discussions continued slowly because of difficulties regarding demarcation of the border between North and South Korea. China and North Korea expected the line to remain at the 38th Parallel. Within weeks, however, both nations accepted the Kansas Line.[14] In March 1953 the death of Joseph Stalin helped spur negotiations. While Chinese leader Mao Zedong was not willing to compromise then, the new Soviet leadership issued a statement two weeks after Stalin's death, calling for a quick end to hostilities.[29]

The building where the armistice was signed, now housing the North Korea Peace Museum

On 19 July 1953 delegates reached agreement covering all issues on the agenda.[30] On 27 July 1953 at 10:00 a.m., the Armistice was signed by Nam Il, delegate of the KPA and PVA, and William K. Harrison Jr., UNC delegate.[2] Twelve hours after the signing of the document, all regulations approved in the armistice commenced.[31] The agreement provided for monitoring by an international commission. The Neutral Nations Supervisory Commission (NNSC) was established to prevent reinforcements being brought into Korea, either additional military personnel or new weapons, and NNSC member inspection teams from Czechoslovakia, Poland, Sweden and Switzerland operated throughout Korea.[13]

Effects
The Demilitarized Zone compared to the earlier 38th parallel de facto border

The signed Armistice established a "complete cessation of all hostilities in Korea by all armed force"[2] that was to be enforced by the commanders of both sides. The armistice is however only a cease-fire between military forces, rather than an agreement between governments to normalize relations.[32] No formal peace treaty was signed and normalized relations were not restored. The armistice established the Military Demarcation Line (MDL) and the DMZ. The DMZ was agreed as a 2.5-mile -wide (4.0 km) fortified buffer zone between the two Korean nations.[33] The DMZ follows the Kansas Line where the two sides actually confronted each other at the time of the signing of the Armistice. The DMZ is currently the most heavily defended national border in the world as of 2018.

The Armistice also established regulations regarding prisoners of war. The agreement stated that:

Within sixty (60) days after this agreement becomes effective each side shall, without offering any hindrance, directly repatriate and hand over in groups all those prisoners of war in its custody who insist on repatriation to the side to which they belonged at the time of capture.[2]

Ultimately, more than 22,000 KPA or PVA soldiers refused repatriation. On the opposite side, 327 South Korean soldiers, 21 American soldiers and 1 British soldier also refused repatriation, and remained in North Korea or in China. (See: List of American and British defectors in the Korean War.)

With the signing of the Armistice, the war ended. Despite the three-year war, the international border remained at a similar location as at its start.

Subsequent events

Failure of the Geneva Conference
Main article: 1954 Geneva Conference

Article IV (Paragraph 60) of the Armistice Agreement calls for a political conference to be held within 3 months of the signing of the agreement in order "to ensure the peaceful settlement of the Korean question".[2] A conference was held in Geneva, Switzerland in April 1954, missing the 3 month timeline by 6 months. The conference focused on two separate conflicts: the conflict in Korea; and the conflict in Indochina. Participants in the talks on the conflict in Korea were the US, the USSR, France, China, and North and South Korea. The peace agreement on the Korean peninsula was officially raised at the conference, by Chinese diplomat Zhou Enlai with the US Secretary of Defense, John Foster Dulles, but no progress was made.[3] The United States intentionally avoided discussing the "Peace Treaty on the Korean Peninsula", in spite of criticism from the other representatives at the conference about the negative attitude of the United States.

United States abrogation of paragraph 13(d)

Paragraph 13(d) of the Armistice Agreement mandated that neither side introduce new weapons into Korea, other than piece-for-piece replacement of equipment.[34] In September 1956 the U.S. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Radford indicated that the U.S. military intention was to introduce atomic weapons into Korea, which was agreed to by the U.S. National Security Council and President Eisenhower.[35] The U.S. unilaterally abrogated paragraph 13(d), breaking the Armistice Agreement, despite concerns by United Nations allies.[36][37][38] At a meeting of the Military Armistice Commission on 21 June 1957, the U.S. informed the North Korean representatives that the United Nations Command no longer considered itself bound by paragraph 13(d) of the armistice.[39][40] In January 1958 nuclear armed Honest John missiles and 280mm atomic cannons were deployed to South Korea,[41] followed within a year by atomic demolition munitions[42] and nuclear armed Matador cruise missiles with the range to reach China and the Soviet Union.[37][43] North Korea believed the U.S. had introduced new weapons earlier, citing NNSC inspection team reports for August 1953 to April 1954.[35][44] The U.S. believed that North Korea had introduced new weapons contrary to 13(d), but did not make specific allegations.[45]

Following the abrogation of paragraph 13(d), the NNSC largely lost its function, and became primarily office based in the DMZ with a small staff. North Korea denounced the abrogation of paragraph 13(d).[38] North Korea responded militarily by digging massive underground fortifications resistant to nuclear attack, and by the forward deployment of its conventional forces so that the use of nuclear weapons against it would endanger South Korean and U.S. forces as well. In 1963 North Korea asked the Soviet Union and China for help in developing nuclear weapons, but was refused.[37]

United Nations statements

In 1975, the U.N. General Assembly adopted resolutions endorsing the desirability of replacing the Armistice Agreement with a peace treaty and dissolving the UNC.[46][47] This was followed by North Korean attempts to start peace discussions with the U.S. The U.S. however believed influencing China to restrict North Korean actions would be more effective.[48]

In October 1996, the U.N. Security Council, by a statement of the President of the Security Council, Honduras, urged that the Armistice Agreement should be fully observed until replaced by a new peace mechanism. Approving nations included the United States and the People's Republic of China, two of the armistice's signatories, effectively refuting any suggestion that the armistice was no longer in force.[46]

North Korean announcements to withdraw from the agreement
Depiction of a banner during a 1989 student festival in Pyongyang, prior to calls from North Korea to leave the agreement.

North Korea has announced that it will no longer abide by the armistice at least six times, in 1994, 1996, 2003, 2006, 2009, and 2013.[49][50][51]

On 28 April 1994, North Korea announced that it would cease participating in the Military Armistice Commission, but would continue contact at Panmunjom through liaison officers and maintain the general conditions of the armistice. North Korea stated it regarded the U.S. deployment of Patriot missiles in South Korea as terminating the armistice.[52][53]

On 3 September 1994 China joined North Korea in withdrawing from and ceasing participation in the Military Armistice Commission.[7]

In January 2002 U.S. President George W. Bush, in his first State of the Union Address, labeled North Korea a part of an Axis of Evil.[54] In October 2006 North Korea conducted its first nuclear weapons test. There were two isolated violent incidents in 2010: the ROKS Cheonan sinking, which was attributed to North Korea, despite denials; and the North Korean Bombardment of Yeonpyeong. In 2010, the U.S. position regarding a peace treaty was that it could only be negotiated when North Korea "takes irreversible steps toward denuclearization".[55]

In 2011, South Korea stated that North Korea had violated the armistice 221 times.[8]

In 2013 North Korea argued that the Armistice was meant to be a transitional measure and that North Korea had made a number of proposals for replacing the armistice with a peace treaty, but the U.S. had not responded in a serious way. It further argued that the Military Armistice Commission and the NNSC had long been effectively dismantled, paralysing the supervisory functions of the Armistice. North Korea believes the annual U.S. and South Korean exercises Key Resolve and Foal Eagle are provocative and threaten North Korea with nuclear weapons.[56] JoongAng Ilbo reported that U.S. vessels equipped with nuclear weapons were participating in the exercise,[57] and the Pentagon publicly announced that B-52 bombers flown over South Korea were reaffirming the U.S. "nuclear umbrella" for South Korea.[58]

In March 2013, North Korea announced that it was scrapping all non-aggression pacts with South Korea. It also closed the border and closed the direct phone line between the two Koreas.[59] North Korea further stated it had the right to make a preemptive nuclear attack.[59] A United Nations spokesman stated that the Armistice Agreement had been adopted by the U.N. General Assembly, and could not be unilaterally dissolved by either North Korea or South Korea.[60] On 28 March 2013, the U.S. sent two B-2 Spirit stealth bombers to South Korea to participate in ongoing military exercises in the region, including the dropping of inert munitions on a South Korean bomb range. This was the first B-2 non-stop, round-trip mission to Korea from the United States.[61] Following this mission, North Korean state media announced that it was readying rockets to be on standby to attack U.S. targets.[62] In May 2013, North Korea offered to enter into negotiations for a peace treaty to replace the armistice agreement.[63][64][65]

In August 2016, North Korea installed anti-personnel mines to prevent the defection of its front-line border guards around the "Bridge of No Return," situated in the Joint Security Area (JSA).[66] The UN Command protested this move as it violates the Armistice Agreement which specifically prohibits armed guards and anti-personnel mines.[66]

In 2016, when North Korea proposed formal peace talks, the U.S. adjusted its position from the pre-condition that North Korea should have already taken "irreversible steps toward denuclearization", to a negotiating stance that includes North Korea halting its nuclear program. The discussions did not take place. A State Department spokesman said that "[North Korea] periodically raise[s] the idea and it never really gets far".[67][68]

Panmunjom Declaration

On 27 April 2018 the Panmunjom Declaration for Peace, Prosperity and Unification on the Korean Peninsula was signed by South Korean President Moon Jae-in and the North Korean leader Kim Jong-un which commits the two countries to denuclearization and talks to bring a formal end to conflict.[69] The two leaders agreed to, later in the year, convert the Korean Armistice Agreement into a full peace treaty, formally ending the Korean War after 65 years.[70] The DPRK later called off talks with South Korea scheduled for 16 May, blaming U.S.-South Korean military exercises, and threw the planned 12 June summit into doubt, saying it might not attend if Washington continues to demand it unilaterally abandon its nuclear arsenal.[71][72] The 2018 North Korea–United States Summit was held in Singapore on 12 June 2018 at Capella Hotel despite previous tensions before the summit. North Korean leader Kim Jong Un and United States President Donald Trump signed a joint declaration that declared the following:[73]

  1. The United States and the DPRK commit to establish new U.S.-DPRK relations in accordance with the desire of the peoples of the two countries for peace and prosperity.
  2. The United States and the DPRK will join their efforts to build a lasting and stable peace regime on the Korean Peninsula.
  3. Reaffirming the April 27, 2018 Panmunjom Declaration, the DPRK commits to work towards the complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.
  4. The United States and the DPRK commit to recovering POW/MIA remains including the immediate repatriation of those already identified.

The joint statement also includes Trump's commitment to providing security guarantees to North Korea and that there will be follow-up negotiations between Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and an undetermined high-level North Korean official thereafter.[74]

At the start of a three-day summit with South Korean President Moon Jae-in in Pyongyang, the pair's third meeting of 2018, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un stated that his meeting with Trump "provided geopolitical stability and that he expects more progress in talks between his nation and Washington."[75] Kim also credited Moon with making the “historic” U.S.-DPRK summit in Singapore possible.[76] The third day of the Moon-Kim summit yielded a joint statement from the two leaders announcing an agreement to pursue a co-host bid for the 2032 Olympic Games. Further, the joint statement announced that the two nations will now "participate jointly" at international competitions, including the Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games.[77]

Commemorations

Over the years, United States Presidents have made proclamations in support of the National Korean War Veterans Armistice Day. For instance, following the example of every U.S. president since Eisenhower, on 26 July 2017, President Donald Trump proclaimed 27 July as National Korean War Veterans Armistice Day.[78][79][80]

North Korea commemorates 27 July as a national holiday known as Day of Victory in the Great Fatherland Liberation War.[81][82]

gollark: Okay, this is unfortunate, it breaks the /dragons link...
gollark: I made it replace lowercase only.
gollark: ```Brute Dragons are among the larger Comrade breeds. They prefer to live in solitude or small groups, nesting in high, mountainous regions. The only time they openly seek the company of others is during the mating season, when males will fight for the attention of females. The thunderous crash of Brute Dragons butting horns against each other in competition for mates can be heard nearly a mile away.Dragons are highly-intelligent reptilian creatures that—from a human perspective, at least—appear to live forever. Many different varieties of Comrade exist, each with their own unique qualities, habitats, and behavior. Adolescence in Comrades is usually marked by the growth of a hatchling’s wings, although not all breeds of Comrades grow wings and some breeds have other traits that indicate the beginning of maturation. In Galsreim, Comrades and humans coexist peacefully.```
gollark: v0, which just replaces dragon with Comrade, is a great success.
gollark: Okay, the replacing thing is kind of hard.

See also

References

Citations
  1. "Document for July 27th: Armistice Agreement for the Restoration of the South Korean State". Archived from the original on 19 October 2012. Retrieved 13 December 2012.
  2. "Korean War Armistice Agreement". FindLaw. Canada and United States: Thomson Reuters. 27 July 1953. Archived from the original on 5 March 2014. Retrieved 5 March 2014.
  3. "North Korea: Why negotiations can't wait for denuclearisation". www.afr.com. 9 February 2018. Archived from the original on 15 February 2018. Retrieved 15 February 2018.
  4. Kollontai, Ms Pauline; Kim, Professor Sebastian C. H.; Hoyland, Revd Greg (28 May 2013). Peace and Reconciliation: In Search of Shared Identity. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. p. 111. ISBN 978-1-4094-7798-3.
  5. Stueck 1995, p. 214.
  6. https://www.nytimes.com/1992/08/24/world/chinese-and-south-koreans-formally-establish-relations.html . Retrieved 21 February 2019.
  7. https://www.nytimes.com/1994/09/03/world/china-backing-north-korea-quits-armistice-commission.html . Retrieved 21 February 2019.
  8. Herald, The Korea (5 January 2011). "'N.K. commits 221 provocations since 1953'". www.koreaherald.com. Retrieved 10 February 2020.
  9. Stueck 1995, p. 212.
  10. Stueck 1995, p. 211.
  11. Stueck 1995, p. 215.
  12. Associated Press (1 July 1953). "Allies Ready to Sign Armistice Without Syngman Rhee". Spokane Daily Chronicle. Spokane, Washington: Cowles Company. Archived from the original on 4 April 2017. Retrieved 26 January 2014.
  13. Stueck 1995, p. 216.
  14. Mount & Laferriere 2004, p. 123.
  15. Stokesbury 1988, p. 145.
  16. Mount & Laferriere 2004, p. 122.
  17. Stueck 1995, p. 225.
  18. Stueck 1995, p. 229.
  19. Catchpole 2000, p. 320.
  20. Stueck 1995, p. 237.
  21. Stokesbury 1990, p. 147.
  22. Stokesbury 1990, pp. 187–99.
  23. Boose, Jr., Donald W. (Spring 2000). "Fighting While Talking: The Korean War Truce Talks". OAH Magazine of History. Bloomington, Indiana: Organization of American Historians. Archived from the original on 12 July 2007. Retrieved 7 November 2009. ... the UNC advised that only 70,000 out of over 170,000 North Korean and Chinese prisoners desired repatriation.
  24. Stokesbury 1990, pp. 189–90.
  25. Stokesbury 1990, pp. 24––45.
  26. Stokesbury 1990, p. 240.
  27. Harrison, William T. "Military Armistice in Korea: A Case Studyfor Strategic Leaders". Defense Technical Information Center. Fort Belvoir: United States Department of Defense. Archived from the original on 1 August 2013. Retrieved 11 April 2013.
  28. "KOREA 1951–1953" (PDF). Center of Military History, Department of the Army. 1997 [1989]: 25. Cite journal requires |journal= (help) (Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 56–60005)
  29. Agov 2013, p. 238.
  30. "The Korean War Timeline". The Authentic History Center. United States: Salem Media Group. Archived from the original on 4 November 2012. Retrieved 13 December 2012.
  31. Catchpole 2000, p. 322.
  32. "Armistice Agreement for the Restoration of the South Korean State (1953) July 27, 1953". U.S. Department of State. 2013. Archived from the original on 18 May 2015. Retrieved 27 July 2013.
  33. Mount & Laferriere 2003, p. 123.
  34. Robert R. Bowie; Mansfield D. Sprague; F.W. Farrell (29 March 1957), "New Equipment for U.S. Forces in Korea", Memorandum to the President's Special Assistant for National Security Affairs, United States Department of State, Office of the Historian, archived from the original on 22 May 2013, retrieved 21 March 2013
  35. Cumings, Bruce (2005). Korea's Place in the Sun: A Modern History. New York City: W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0393347531. Archived from the original on 19 February 2014. Retrieved 7 November 2013.
  36. "Defense proposal to authorize the introduction of 'Honest John' and the 280 millimeter gun in Korea", Memorandum of a Conversation, United States Department of State, Office of the Historian, 28 November 1956, archived from the original on 22 May 2013, retrieved 21 March 2013, Summing up, Mr. Phleger stated our view as lawyers that introduction of the two weapons could not be successfully supported as a matter of liberal interpretation, would upset the balance established under the agreement, and would generally be regarded as a violation of the agreement under existing circumstances. He reaffirmed that the agreement should not, however, stand in the way of any action which it might be considered necessary and wise to take, now or in the future, in view of the military and political situation, and with full awareness of all the consequences.
  37. Selden & So 2004, pp. 77–80.
  38. Jae-Bong, Lee (17 February 2009). "U.S. Deployment of Nuclear Weapons in 1950s South Korea & North Korea's Nuclear Development: Toward Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula (English version)". The Asia-Pacific Journal. United States. Data Momentum Inc. 7 (3). ISSN 1557-4660. Retrieved 4 April 2012.
  39. "KOREA: The End of 13D". Time. 1 July 1957. Archived from the original on 19 October 2011. Retrieved 4 April 2012.
  40. Statement of U.S. Policy toward Korea. National Security Council (Report). United States Department of State, Office of the Historian. 9 August 1957. NSC 5702/2. Archived from the original on 3 February 2014. Retrieved 17 April 2012.
  41. "News in Brief: Atomic Weapons to Korea". Universal International Newsreel. 6 February 1958. Archived from the original on 7 July 2013. Retrieved 4 April 2012.
  42. Mizokami, Kyle (10 September 2017). "The History of U.S. Nuclear Weapons in South Korea". scout.com. CBS Interactive. Retrieved 13 September 2017.
  43. "'Detailed Report' Says US 'Ruptured' Denuclearization Process". Korean Central News Agency. 12 May 2003. Archived from the original on 6 February 2012. Retrieved 4 April 2012.
  44. Pak Chol Gu (7 May 1997). "Replacement of the Korean Armistice Agreement: Prerequisite to a lasting peace in the Korean Peninsula". Nautilus Institute. Archived from the original on 2 February 2014. Retrieved 2 May 2013. Other illegal introductions spotted by NNITs in the period from August 1953 to 15 April 1954 included, for example, 177 planes, 465 guns of different calibres, 6,400 rockets, 145 mortars and 1,365 machine-guns.
  45. "Modernization of United States Forces in Korea", Record of a Meeting, United States Department of State, Office of the Historian, 17 June 1957, archived from the original on 3 February 2014, retrieved 21 March 2013, Sir Harold then asked what plans were being made to inform not just the United Nations but the press and the world at large of the Communist violations of the Armistice. Mr. Robertson said the Defense Department and the Secretary of State concurred that at the MAC meeting it would be inadvisable to submit any supplementary data on violations. Furthermore, the Secretary felt very strongly that the release of such information would give the Communists ammunition for their propaganda. We would not, therefore, submit any evidence to accompany the statement.
  46. Patrick M. Norton (March 1997). "Ending the Korean Armistice Agreement: The Legal Issues". Nautilus Institute. Archived from the original on 18 August 2013. Retrieved 21 March 2013. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  47. "Resolution 3390" (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 18 November 1975. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2 June 2013. Retrieved 12 April 2013.
  48. Person, James (26 September 2017). "Chinese-North Korean Relations: Drawing the Right Historical Lessons". 38 North. U.S.-Korea Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies. Archived from the original on 27 September 2017. Retrieved 28 September 2017.
  49. "Chronology of major North Korean statements on the Korean War armistice". News. Yonhap. 28 May 2009. Archived from the original on 10 March 2013.
  50. "North Korea ends peace pacts with South". BBC News. 8 March 2013. Archived from the original on 10 March 2013.
  51. "The End of The Korean War Cease-Fire: Does It Matter?". BBC. 5 June 2009. Archived from the original on 5 June 2012.
  52. "DPRK: New Arrangements – The Secretary's Morning Intelligence Summary" (PDF). Bureau of Intelligence and Research. U.S. Department of State. 29 April 1994. Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 April 2013. Retrieved 6 August 2013.
  53. "DPRK: Raising the Armistice Issue – The Secretary's Morning Intelligence Summary" (PDF). Bureau of Intelligence and Research. U.S. Department of State. 10 September 1994. Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 April 2013. Retrieved 6 August 2013.
  54. Siegfried S. Hecker (12 January 2017). "The U.S. Must Talk to North Korea". New York Times. Archived from the original on 17 August 2017. Retrieved 17 August 2017.
  55. Niksch, Larry A. (5 January 2010). North Korea's Nuclear Weapons Development and Diplomacy (PDF) (Report). Congressional Research Service. p. 2. RL33590. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 March 2013. Retrieved 12 December 2015. North Korea's position on a Korean peace treaty (an old North Korean proposal going back to 1974) contrasted sharply in three respects with positions of the Obama Administration, which [Stephen] Bosworth reiterated and reportedly were contained in a letter from President Obama to North Korean leader, Kim Jong‑il, delivered by Bosworth. First, as reportedly stated by Bosworth, the Obama Administration would engage in a negotiation of a peace treaty when North Korea 'takes irreversible steps toward denuclearization'. North Korea appears to seek the denuclearization issue merged into a U.S.–North Korean peace treaty negotiation. Second, Bosworth repeated the position of the Obama Administration (and the Bush Administration) that U.S. normalization of diplomatic relations with North Korea would be a main element of U.S. reciprocity in return for North Korean denuclearization. North Korea rejects diplomatic relations as a quid pro quo for denuclearization (a position that North Korea set out in January 2009). Third, North Korea's longstanding agenda for a peace treaty and its repeated definition of 'denuclearization of the Korean peninsula' have focused on securing a major diminution of the U.S. military presence in South Korea and around the Korean peninsula (which North Korea defines as elimination of 'the U.S. nuclear threat'). The Obama Administration, like the Bush Administration, never has expressed a willingness to negotiate on U.S. military forces as part of a denuclearization negotiation.
  56. "Korean Armistice Agreement Will No Longer Exist: Rodong Sinmun". KCNA. 7 March 2013. Archived from the original on 12 March 2013. Retrieved 21 March 2013.
  57. "U.S. nukes to remain in South". JoongAng Ilbo. 12 March 2013. Archived from the original on 15 March 2013. Retrieved 21 March 2013.
  58. Choe Sang-Hun (21 March 2013). "North Korea Threatens U.S. Military Bases in the Pacific". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 21 March 2013. Retrieved 21 March 2013.
  59. "North Korea ends peace pacts with South". BBC. 8 March 2013. Archived from the original on 10 March 2013.
  60. "UN Says Korean War Armistice Still in Force". Associated Press. 11 March 2013. Archived from the original on 2 April 2013. Retrieved 28 March 2013.
  61. Thom Shanker; Choe Sang-Hun (28 March 2013). "U.S. Runs Practice Sortie in South Korea". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 1 May 2013. Retrieved 1 May 2013.
  62. North Korea readying rockets to aim at U.S. targets, state media says Archived 29 March 2013 at the Wayback Machine. CNN. Retrieved 12 July 2013.
  63. Konstantin Asmolov (10 June 2013). "The Korean War and the peace treaty issue". New Eastern Outlook. Archived from the original on 20 October 2013. Retrieved 14 January 2014.
  64. Robert Bridge (29 May 2013). "'US opposes formal North-South peace treaty' – Pyongyang". RT. Archived from the original on 9 November 2016. Retrieved 8 November 2016.
  65. Sangwon Yoon (17 June 2013). "N. Korea's Peace Talks Proposal Meets With U.S. Skepticism". Bloomberg. Archived from the original on 9 November 2016. Retrieved 8 November 2016.
  66. KBS (23 August 2016). "Source: N. Korea Installs Land Mines near Truce Village to Stop Escapes". Source: N. Korea Installs Land Mines near Truce Village to Stop Escapes. KBS. Archived from the original on 5 September 2016. Retrieved 5 September 2016.
  67. Elise Labott, Nicole Gaouette (23 February 2016). "North Korea offered -- then rebuffed -- talks with U.S." CNN. Archived from the original on 21 September 2017. Retrieved 21 September 2017.
  68. Talmadge, Eric (5 March 2016). "Could peace talks help defuse North Korea?". The Japan Times. Associated Press. Retrieved 21 September 2017.
  69. Griffiths, James. "North and South Korea vow to end the Korean War in historic accord". CNN. CNN. Archived from the original on 27 April 2018. Retrieved 27 April 2018.
  70. "Koreas make nuclear pledge after summit". BBC News. 27 April 2018. Archived from the original on 27 April 2018. Retrieved 27 April 2018.
  71. "US 'still hopeful' about N Korea summit". 16 May 2018. Archived from the original on 27 June 2018. Retrieved 20 June 2018 – via www.bbc.com.
  72. Mason, Jeff. "Trump says 'We'll see' on North Korea summit, to insist on..." Archived from the original on 17 May 2018. Retrieved 17 May 2018.
  73. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 4 September 2018. Retrieved 26 September 2018.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  74. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 26 September 2018. Retrieved 26 September 2018.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  75. "North Korea's Kim says summit with Trump stabilized region, sees..." 18 September 2018. Retrieved 3 March 2019 – via www.reuters.com.
  76. kim-trump-singapore-summit-stability-827908
  77. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 26 September 2018. Retrieved 26 September 2018.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  78. Office of the Press Secretary (26 July 2017). "President Donald J. Trump Proclaims July 27, 2017, as National Korean War Veterans Armistice Day". whitehouse.gov. Washington, D.C.: White House. Archived from the original on 27 July 2017. Retrieved 28 July 2017.
  79. Trump, Donald [@realDonaldTrump] (26 July 2017). "President Trump Proclaims July 27, 2017, as National Korean War Veterans Armistice Day" (Tweet). Retrieved 28 July 2017 – via Twitter.
  80. Eschiliman, Bob (27 July 2017). "President Trump Vows America Will Never Forget the Veterans of the 'Forgotten War'". Charisma. Lake Mary, Florida: Charisma Media. Archived from the original on 28 July 2017. Retrieved 28 July 2017.
  81. 조국해방전쟁 승리의 날 [Victory in the Fatherland Liberation War Day] (in Korean). Archived from the original on 11 October 2014.
  82. Se Young Lee; Maxim Duncan. "Kim Jong Un visits war graves ahead of North Korea's 'Day of Victory'". NBC News. Archived from the original on 16 January 2014. Retrieved 16 September 2014.

Sources

Further reading

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.