Hawkers in Hong Kong

Hawkers in Hong Kong (Chinese: 小販) are vendors of street food and inexpensive goods. They are found in urban areas and new towns alike, although certain districts such as Mong Kok, Sham Shui Po, and Kwun Tong are known for high concentrations of hawkers.

A street market in Wan Chai in 2010

For many decades, hawking has served as a means for the lower class to make a living in Hong Kong, and allowed patrons to benefit from the convenience and low cost of hawker goods. However, the government has long considered the practice to be detrimental to public hygiene, and it has therefore been controlled by the Urban Council and its successor, the Food and Environmental Hygiene Department.

Characteristics

Hawkers may be divided into the categories of fixed-pitch and itinerant (travelling). Both categories may sell a variety of goods, including food or dry goods. Street food hawkers commonly sell foods such as fishballs and fake shark fin soup (碗仔翅) relatively cheaply, from roadside vendor stalls.

The Hong Kong government has attempted to reduce the number of illegal vendors by designating hawker-permitted areas, but a large percentage of street vendors still operate illegally. According to Leung Yin Ling, author of the book 消失中的小販文化 (Disappearing Hawker Culture), hawkers exemplify the spirit of determination in the face of adversity that is an indelible part of Hong Kong culture.[1] Local scholar Ma Kwok Ming has claimed that the economy of Hong Kong relies to a large extent on the street food industry, and that if hawkers are too harshly regulated, there will be little room for the development of Hong Kong food culture.

The Cantonese phrase jau gwei (Chinese: 走鬼; Jyutping: zau2 gwai2; lit. running [away from] ghosts) refers to the sudden abandonment of these stalls when Hawker Control Teams (Chinese: 小販管理隊, or 販管隊 in short) are imminent and the vendors are operating illegally or selling prohibited items, such as counterfeit branded goods. Gwei, meaning ghosts, refers to the Hawker Control Officers, who were traditionally Westerners. The phrase is shouted by vendors to warn others of the approaching squads, and can also be heard in Macao and Guangdong Province, where similar situations exist with illegal street vendors.

History

1940–1960s: Migrant influx from rural China
Hawkers on Temple Street in 1950

Between the 1940s and 60s, there was an influx of migrants from rural areas of mainland China into Hong Kong due to political instabilities in China (influenced by the Chinese Civil War and the Cultural Revolution) as well as famine. Many of these migrants were unskilled and uneducated, and became itinerant hawkers to earn a living with low operating costs, selling daily necessities such as food and clothing to those of the working classes.[2][3] At that time, the economic condition in Hong Kong was low and working-class families were large, giving rise to 'family consumption'.[4] These families bought their basic necessities from hawkers.

According to the Hong Kong Hawkers Association, there were an estimated 70,000 or more street hawkers in Hong Kong in 1949.[5] At that time, while hawking provided employment opportunities, the large numbers of hawkers also led to noise pollution and congestion. In addition, it was stated that street hawking discouraged market development, since hawkers paid lower licence fees (HK$1,000-HK$3,000) than shop and stall tenants who also had to pay rents.[5]

1960–1970s: Increasing numbers
Hawkers in Tuen Mun in 2015

In the 1960s and 70s, at a time when there were few shopping malls and markets and little governmental regulation, the number of hawkers exceeded 300,000.[6] Hawker numbers rose with the unemployment caused by the 1973-74 stock market crash and 1970s energy crisis, which led to factory closures and the decline of the manufacturing sector in Hong Kong.

1970–2010: Regulation

However, as industrialisation and urbanisation increased, the British government became concerned about the health and hygiene issues posed by itinerant hawkers. In the 1970s, Itinerant Hawker Licences were issued and the succession and transfer of licenses was banned. The system granted licenses to 39,033 hawkers and prohibited 6,000 from the practice.[7] Thereafter, the number of itinerant hawkers continued to decline.

In 2002, a five-year voluntary surrender scheme was implemented to encourage itinerant hawkers to surrender their licenses in exchange for "a one-off ex gratia payment, rental of a vacant stall in public markets under concessionary terms, or becoming a (non-cooked food) fixed pitch hawker.”[8] The scheme drastically decreased the number of licensed hawkers, from 50,000 in 1974 to about 6,000 in 2007.[7]

As of November 30, 2008, the total number of Fixed-Pitch Hawker Licenses (including dai pai dongs) and Itinerant Hawker Licenses were 6,594 and 552 respectively.[9]

In 2009, the Hong Kong Food and Health Bureau (FHB) in conjunction with the Food and Environmental Hygiene Department (FEHD) reviewed the hawker licensing policy, with a view to potentially issuing new licenses to fixed-pitch hawkers.[9]

In recent years, the FEHD has taken action during Chinese New Year night markets, targeting unlicensed food hawkers on grounds of unsanitary practices, obstruction of roadways, noise pollution, and other nuisances.[10] At the same time, members of the community have increasingly valued hawking as an element of Hong Kong's cultural heritage and collective memory, and as a valuable means of support for grassroots people.

During the 2014 Lunar New Year, unannounced inspections were conducted at Kweilin Street Night Market, with FEHD officers making arrests and confiscating a food cart. These actions led to public disquiet, with accusations of officers' opposition to ordinary citizens. Hawkers returned and the night market resumed as normal shortly after the officers' departure.[11]

In November 2014, Sham Shui Po District Council, controlled by the pro-Beijing camp, passed a vote for zero-tolerance of unlicensed hawkers during the upcoming Lunar New Year,[12] although other District Council members including Frederick Fung of the Association for Democracy and People's Livelihood (ADPL) obtained an exception for vendors selling dry goods.[13] In reaction, grassroots organisations claimed that due to the government refusal to issue new hawker licences or construct new markets, vendors could only subsist in defiance of the law. It was further asserted that Kweilin Street Night Market was enjoying a resurgence in popularity and that a zero-tolerance hawker policy would only serve to exacerbate grievances.[14] During the 2015 Lunar New Year, there were at least three groups in Sham Shui Po giving vocal support for street vendors,[15] and Hong Kong locals embarked on a campaign of street cleaning of the night market in order to allay concerns over hygiene.[16]

On 2 February 2016, in the approach to the Lunar New Year, a conflict occurred when hawkers were prevented from setting up stall at Leung King Estate, so as not to disrupt activity at the nearby shopping mall operated by Link REIT.[17] On February 7, Lunar New Year's Eve, multiple hawkers set up stall in Kweilin Street Night Market and were chased away or arrested, as was teacher and activist Siu Lai, who acted in defiance of the policy.[18][19][20]

During the 2016 Lunar New Year, a violent bout of civil unrest dubbed the 'fishball revolution' (魚蛋革命) broke out in Mong Kok in response to the hardline approach taken by the FEHD to crack down on hawking in Hong Kong.[21][22][23]

On 22 May 2016 unrest broke out at Yat Tung Estate in Tung Chung, where residents had held a bazaar in defiance of ongoing rent increases by Link REIT, which owns the shopping centre and market in Yat Tung and many other estates. Staff from the Housing Authority called the police and stated that the bazaar was causing "obstruction", a claim that was dismissed by some residents.[24]

gollark: Unironically fine, there isn't even that much.
gollark: Somehow run oil wells backward and replace all the oil with uranium.
gollark: Besides, some radiation is good for them, helps keep mutation rates up.
gollark: The fish will be fine if it's spread out enough. Probably.
gollark: Liquefy nuclear waste and dilute it with lots of water, then spray it into large tracts of the ocean from planes.

See also

References
  1. Leung Yin Ling. (2011, July). Disappearing of Itinerant Hawker Culture.消失中的小販文化 Retrieved 9 March 2015 from http://www.ln.edu.hk/mcsln/25th_issue/feature_01.shtml
  2. Ma Kwok Ming. (2009) Roadside Political Economy 路邊政治經濟學新編(Ed.).Hong Kong. HK: Step Forward Multi Media Co Ltd. P. 83
  3. Leung Yin Ling. (2011, July). Disappearing of Itinerant Hawker Culture.消失中的小販文化 Retrieved 9 March 2015 from http://www.ln.edu.hk/mcsln/25th_issue/feature_01.shtml
  4. Consumer culture and economic restructure is closely related 消費文化與經濟轉型 密切相關.(2008,Sept 10). Wen Wei Po. Retrieved 9 March 2015 from http://paper.wenweipo.com/2008/09/08/HK0809080062.htm
  5. Sataline, S., Renton, A. Closing time: How Hong Kong’s hawkers face a struggle to survive. South China Morning Post. Retrieved 3 March 2015, from http://multimedia.scmp.com/hawkers/
  6. A positive view to hawkers and put their features into good use.正面看待小販 特色善加利用(2009,Dec.15). Wen Wei Po. Retrieved 9 March 2015 from http://paper.wenweipo.com/2007/11/15/WW0711150002.htm
  7. Sataline, S., Renton, A. Closing time: How Hong Kong’s hawkers face a struggle to survive. South China Morning Post. Retrieved 3 March 2015, from http://multimedia.scmp.com/hawkers/
  8. http://www.fhb.gov.hk,. (2009). Review on Hawker Licensing Policy. Retrieved 13 March 2015,from http://www.fhb.gov.hk/download/committees/board/doc/2009/paper20090115_92.pdf
  9. "Review on Hawker Licensing Policy" (PDF). Food and Health Bureau. Food and Health Bureau. 15 January 2009. Retrieved 20 April 2016.
  10. "食環擬趕絶 桂林夜市恐消失". 立場新聞. 11 February 2015. Retrieved 9 February 2016.
  11. "「桂林街夜市」 掃蕩惹鼓譟". Oriental Daily News. 3 February 2014. Retrieved 9 February 2016.
  12. "過年前帶頭趕絕 民建聯今倡深水埗設夜市 | 立場報道 | 立場新聞". 立場新聞 Stand News. Retrieved 30 April 2016.
  13. "建制派發功 農曆年「桂林夜市」或成絕響". Apple Daily (in Chinese). 16 January 2015. Retrieved 9 February 2016.
  14. "指桂林夜市如佔深　民建聯促零容忍執法 撐基層聯盟：徒增民怨". Apple Daily (in Chinese). 17 January 2015. Retrieved 9 February 2016.
  15. "新春可否有夜市 為小販求情？". 經濟日報. 17 February 2015. Retrieved 10 February 2016.
  16. "桂林夜市旺角重生　本土派協助清理街道 | 熱血編輯部 | 熱血新聞 | 熱血時報". www.passiontimes.hk. Retrieved 30 April 2016.
  17. "良景邨小販踩過界 金毛管理員晒馬". Apple Daily (in Chinese). 3 February 2016.(in Chinese)
  18. "小麗老師被捕". 立場新聞. 8 February 2016.(in Chinese)
  19. "我擺街，但我沒犯罪！". 立場新聞. 8 February 2016.(in Chinese)
  20. "【街頭夜市】警察食環夾擊桂林夜市拉人封檔 斥市民煽動包圍". Apple Daily 蘋果日報. Retrieved 30 April 2016.
  21. Moss, Stephen (9 February 2016). "Is Hong Kong really rioting over fishball stands?". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 April 2016.
  22. Diplomat, Linda van der Horst, The. "A Fishball Revolution and Umbrella Soldiers: The Battle for Hong Kong's Soul". The Diplomat. Retrieved 30 April 2016.
  23. "'Fishball Revolution' Creates Chaos on Hong Kong Streets During Lunar New Year Fest | VICE News". VICE News. Retrieved 30 April 2016.
  24. Yuen, Chantal (23 May 2016). "Tung Chung residents hold bazaar in protest of Link REIT's market outsourcing and rent rises". Hong Kong Free Press.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.