Grammatical case

"Case" is a linguistics term regarding a manner of categorizing nouns, pronouns, adjectives, participles, and numerals according to their traditionally corresponding grammatical functions within a given phrase, clause, or sentence. In some languages, nouns, pronouns, adjectives, determiners, participles, prepositions, numerals, articles and their modifiers take different inflected forms, depending on their case. As a language evolves, cases can merge (for instance, in Ancient Greek, the locative case merged with the dative case), a phenomenon formally called syncretism.[1]

English has largely lost its inflected case system although personal pronouns still have three cases, which are simplified forms of the nominative, accusative and genitive cases. They are used with personal pronouns: subjective case (I, you, he, she, it, we, they, who, whoever), objective case (me, you, him, her, it, us, them, whom, whomever) and possessive case (my, mine; your, yours; his; her, hers; its; our, ours; their, theirs; whose; whosever).[2] Forms such as I, he and we are used for the subject ("I kicked the ball"), and forms such as me, him and us are used for the object ("John kicked me").

Languages such as Ancient Greek, Armenian, Assamese, most Balto-Slavic languages, Basque, most Caucasian languages, most Dravidian languages,[3] German, Icelandic, Japanese, Korean, Latin, Sanskrit, Tibetan, the Turkic languages and the Uralic languages have extensive case systems, with nouns, pronouns, adjectives, and determiners all inflecting (usually by means of different suffixes) to indicate their case. The number of cases differs between languages: Persian and Esperanto have two; modern English has three but for pronouns only; Modern Standard and Classical forms of Arabic have three; German, Icelandic, and Irish have four; Romanian has five; Latin, Slovenian, Russian and Turkish each have at least six; Armenian, Czech, Latvian, Lithuanian, Polish, Serbo-Croatian, Slovak and Ukrainian have seven; Sanskrit and Tamil have eight; Assamese has 10; Estonian has 14; Finnish has 15; Hungarian has 18 and Tsez has 64 cases.

Commonly encountered cases include nominative, accusative, dative and genitive. A role that one of those languages marks by case is often marked in English with a preposition. For example, the English prepositional phrase with (his) foot (as in "John kicked the ball with his foot") might be rendered in Russian using a single noun in the instrumental case, or in Ancient Greek as τῷ ποδί (tôi podí, meaning "the foot") with both words (the definite article, and the noun πούς (poús) "foot") changing to dative form.

More formally, case has been defined as "a system of marking dependent nouns for the type of relationship they bear to their heads".[4]^:p.1 Cases should be distinguished from thematic roles such as agent and patient. They are often closely related, and in languages such as Latin, several thematic roles have an associated case, but cases are a morphological notion, and thematic roles a semantic one. Languages having cases often exhibit free word order, as thematic roles are not required to be marked by position in the sentence.

History

It is widely accepted that the Ancient Greeks had a certain idea of the forms of a name in their own language. A fragment of Anacreon seems to prove this. Nevertheless, it cannot be inferred that the Ancient Greeks really knew what grammatical cases were. Grammatical cases were first recognized by the Stoics and from some philosophers of the Peripatetic school.[5][6] The advancements of those philosophers were later employed by the philologists of the Alexandrian school.[7][5]

Etymology

The English word case used in this sense comes from the Latin casus, which is derived from the verb cadere, "to fall", from the Proto-Indo-European root *ḱad-.[8] The Latin word is a calque of the Greek πτῶσις, ptôsis, lit. "falling, fall".[9] The sense is that all other cases are considered to have "fallen" away from the nominative. This imagery is also reflected in the word declension, from Latin declinere, "to lean", from the PIE root *ḱley-.

The equivalent to "case" in several other European languages also derives from casus, including cas in French, caso in Italian, caso in Spanish, caso in Portuguese and Kasus in German. The Russian word паде́ж (padyézh) is a calque from Greek and similarly contains a root meaning "fall", and the German Fall and Czech pád simply mean "fall", and are used for both the concept of grammatical case and to refer to physical falls. The Finnish equivalent is sija, whose main meaning is "position" or "place".

Indo-European languages

On this sign in Russian memorializing an anniversary of the city of Balakhna, the word Balakhna (Russian: Балахна) on the right is in the nominative case, whereas the word Balakhne (Russian: Балахне) is in the dative case in Balakhne 500 Let ('500 years of Balakhna') on the front of the sign. Furthermore, let is in the genitive (plural) case.

Although not very prominent in modern English, cases featured much more saliently in Old English and other ancient Indo-European languages, such as Latin, Old Persian, Ancient Greek, and Sanskrit. Historically, the Indo-European languages had eight morphological cases, though modern languages typically have fewer, using prepositions and word order to convey information that had previously been conveyed using distinct noun forms. Among modern languages, cases still feature prominently in most of the Balto-Slavic languages (except Macedonian and Bulgarian[10]), with most having six to eight cases, as well as Icelandic, German and Modern Greek, which have four. In German, cases are mostly marked on articles and adjectives, and less so on nouns. In Icelandic, articles, adjectives, personal names and nouns are all marked for case, making it, among other things, the living Germanic language that could be said to most closely resemble Proto-Germanic.

The eight historical Indo-European cases are as follows, with examples either of the English case or of the English syntactic alternative to case:

Case	Indicates	Sample case words	Sample sentence	Interrogative	Notes
Nominative	Subject of a finite verb	we	We went to the store.	Who or what?	Corresponds to English's subject pronouns.
Accusative	Direct object of a transitive verb	us, for us, the (object)	The clerk remembered us. John waited for us* at the bus stop.* Obey the law.	Whom or what?	Corresponds to English's object pronouns and preposition for construction before the object, often marked by a definite article the. Together with dative, it forms modern English's oblique case.
Dative	Indirect object of a verb	us, to us, to the (object)	The clerk gave us a discount. The clerk gave a discount to us. According to the law...	Whom or to what?	Corresponds to English's object pronouns and preposition to construction before the object, often marked by a definite article the. Together with accusative, it forms modern English's oblique case.
Ablative	Movement away from	from us	The pigeon flew from us* to a steeple.*	Whence? From where/whom?
Genitive	Possessor of another noun	's, of (the), his	John's book was on the table. The pages of the book* turned yellow.* Table made out of wood. To each his* own.*	Whose? From what or what of?	Roughly corresponds to English's possessive (possessive determiners and pronouns) and preposition of construction.
Vocative	Addressee	John	John, are you all right? Hello, John!
Locative	Location, either physical or temporal	in Japan, at the bus stop, in the future	We live in Japan. John is waiting for us at the bus stop. We will see what will happen in the future.	Where or wherein? When?	Roughly corresponds to English prepositions in, on, at, and by and other less common prepositions.
Instrumental	A means or tool used or companion present in/while performing an action	with a mop, by hand	We wiped the floor with a mop. This letter was written by hand.	How? With what or using what? By what means? With whom?	Corresponds to English prepositions by, with and via as well as synonymous constructions such as using, by use of and through.

All of the above are just rough descriptions; the precise distinctions vary significantly from language to language, and as such they are often more complex. Case is based fundamentally on changes to the noun to indicate the noun's role in the sentence – one of the defining features of so-called fusional languages. Old English was a fusional language, but Modern English does not work this way.

Modern English

Modern English has largely abandoned the inflectional case system of Proto-Indo-European in favor of analytic constructions. The personal pronouns of Modern English retain morphological case more strongly than any other word class (a remnant of the more extensive case system of Old English). For other pronouns, and all nouns, adjectives, and articles, grammatical function is indicated only by word order, by prepositions, and by the "Saxon genitive" (-'s).[lower-alpha 1]

Taken as a whole, English personal pronouns are typically said to have three morphological cases:

The nominative case (subjective pronouns such as I, he, she, we), used for the subject of a finite verb and sometimes for the complement of a copula.
The oblique case (object pronouns such as me, him, her, us), used for the direct or indirect object of a verb, for the object of a preposition, for an absolute disjunct, and sometimes for the complement of a copula.
The genitive case (possessive pronouns such as my/mine, his, her/hers, our/ours), used for a grammatical possessor. This is not always considered to be a case; see English possessive § Status of the possessive as a grammatical case.

Most English personal pronouns have five forms: the nominative and oblique case forms, the possessive case, which has both a determiner form (such as my, our) and a distinct independent form (such as mine, ours) (with two exceptions: the third person singular masculine and the third person singular neuter it, which use the same form for both determiner and independent [his car, it is his]), and a distinct reflexive or intensive form (such as myself, ourselves). The interrogative personal pronoun who exhibits the greatest diversity of forms within the modern English pronoun system, having definite nominative, oblique, and genitive forms (who, whom, whose) and equivalently coordinating indefinite forms (whoever, whomever, and whosever).

Though English pronouns can have subject and object forms (he/him, she/her), nouns show only a singular/plural and a possessive/non-possessive distinction (e.g. chair, chairs, chair's, chairs'). Note that chair does not change form between "the chair is here" (subject) and "I saw the chair" (direct object), a distinction made by word order and context.

Hierarchy of cases

Cases can be ranked in the following hierarchy, where a language that does not have a given case will tend not to have any cases to the right of the missing case:[4]^:p.89

nominative → accusative or ergative → genitive → dative → locative or prepositional → ablative and/or instrumental → others.

This is, however, only a general tendency. Many forms of Central German, such as Colognian and Luxembourgish, have a dative case but lack a genitive. In Irish nouns, the nominative and accusative have fallen together, whereas the dative–locative has remained separate in some paradigms; Irish also has genitive and vocative cases. In many modern Indo-Aryan languages, the accusative, genitive, and dative have merged to an oblique case, but much of these languages still retain vocative, locative, and ablative cases. Old English had an instrumental case, but not a locative or prepositional.

Case order

The traditional case order (nom-gen-dat-acc) was expressed for the first time in The Art of Grammar in the 2nd century BC:

Πτώσεις ὀνομάτων εἰσὶ πέντε· ὀρθή, γενική, δοτική, αἰτιατική, κλητική.

There are five Cases, the right [nominative], the generic [genitive], the dative, the accusative, and the vocative.[17]

Latin grammars, such as Ars grammatica, followed the Greek tradition, but added the ablative case of Latin. Later other European languages also followed that Graeco-Roman tradition.

However, for some languages, such as Latin, due to case syncretism the order may be changed for convenience, where the accusative or the vocative cases are placed after the nominative and before the genitive. For example:

Latin
	aqua, aquae water f.		bellum, bellī war n.
	Singular	Plural	Singular	Plural
Nominative	aqua	aquae	bellum	bella
Vocative	aqua	aquae
Accusative	aquam	aquās
Genitive	aquae	aquārum	bellī	bellōrum
Dative	aquae	aquīs	bellō	bellīs
Ablative	aquā	aquīs	bellō	bellīs

For similar reasons, the customary order of the four cases in Icelandic is nominative–accusative–dative–genitive, as illustrated below:

number	case	masculine	feminine	neuter	neuter
singular	nom.	hattur	borg	glas	gler
	acc.	hatt		glas	gler
	dat.	hatti		glasi	gleri
	gen.	hatts	borgar	glass	glers
plural	nom.	hattar	borgir	glös	gler
	acc.	hatta	borgir	glös	gler
	dat.	höttum	borgum	glösum	gler(j)um
	gen.	hatta	borga	glasa	gler(j)a

Case concord systems

In the most common[4] case concord system, only the head-word (the noun) in a phrase is marked for case. This system appears in many Papuan languages as well as in Turkic, Mongolian, Quechua, Dravidian, Indo-Aryan, and other languages. In Basque and various Amazonian and Australian languages, only the phrase-final word (not necessarily the noun) is marked for case. In many Indo-European, Finnic, and Semitic languages, case is marked on the noun, the determiner, and usually the adjective. Other systems are less common. In some languages, there is double-marking of a word as both genitive (to indicate semantic role) and another case such as accusative (to establish concord with the head noun).[18]

Declension paradigms

Declension is the process or result of altering nouns to the correct grammatical cases. Languages with rich nominal inflection (use grammatical cases for many purposes) typically have a number of identifiable declension classes, or groups of nouns with a similar pattern of case inflection or declension. Sanskrit has six declension classes, whereas Latin is traditionally considered to have five, and Ancient Greek three.[19] For example, Slovak has fifteen noun declension classes, five for each gender (the number may vary depending on which paradigms are counted or omitted, this mainly concerns those that modify declension of foreign words; refer to article).

In Indo-European languages, declension patterns may depend on a variety of factors, such as gender, number, phonological environment, and irregular historical factors. Pronouns sometimes have separate paradigms. In some languages, particularly Slavic languages, a case may contain different groups of endings depending on whether the word is a noun or an adjective. A single case may contain many different endings, some of which may even be derived from different roots. For example, in Polish, the genitive case has -a, -u, -ów, -i/-y, -e- for nouns, and -ego, -ej, -ich/-ych for adjectives. To a lesser extent, a noun's animacy or humanness may add another layer of complexity. For example, in Russian:

Kot (NOM, animate, zero ending) lóvit myshéy. ((The) cat catches mice)
Stolb (NOM, inanimate, zero ending) dérzhit krýshu. ((The) pillar holds a/the roof)

vs.

Pyotr gládit kotá (ACC, animate, -a ending). (Peter strokes a/the cat)

and

Pyotr lomáyet stolb (ACC, inanimate, zero ending). (Peter breaks a/the pillar)

Examples

Assamese

Assamese has ten cases.

	English	Significance	Usual Suffixes	Transliteration of Suffixes	Example with চুলি (suli, “hair”)
(I)	Absolutive	Subject of sentence	Ø	Ø	suli
(II)	Ergative	Agent	এ (য়ে, ৱে), ই	e, i	sulie
(III)	Accusative	Object of action	অক / ক (animate); Ø (inanimate)	ok / k; Ø	sulik; suli
(IV)	Genitive	Possessive	অৰ	or / r	sulir
(V)	Dative	Object to whom action is performed	অক / ক	ok / k	sulik
(VI)	Dative of motion form	Object for whom action is performed	অলৈ / লৈ	oloi / loi	suliloi
(VII)	Terminative		অলৈকে / লৈকে	oloike / loike	suliloike
(VIII)	Instrumental of motion from	Means by which action is done	এৰে / ৰে	ere / re	sulire
(IX)	Locative	Place in which, On the person of (animate) in the presence of	অত / ত	ot / t	sulit
(X)	Vocative	Addressing, calling	অ, Ø, হে	o, Ø, he	o suli!, suli!, he suli!

Australian Aboriginal Languages

Australian languages represent a diversity of case paradigms in terms of their alignment (i.e. nominative-accusative vs. ergative-absolutive) and the morpho-syntactic properties of case inflection including where/how many times across a noun phrase the case morphology will appear. For typical r-expression noun phrases, most Australian languages follow a basic ERG-ABS template with additional cases for peripheral arguments; however, many Australian languages, the function of case marking extends beyond the prototypical function of specifying the syntactic and semantic relation of an NP to a predicate.[20] Dench and Evans (1988)[21] use a five-part system for categorizing the functional roles of case marking in Australian languages. They are enumerated below as they appear in Senge (2015)[20]:

Relational: a suffix which represents syntactic or semantic roles of a noun phrase in clauses.
Adnominal: a suffix which relates a noun phrase to another within the one noun phrase.
Referential: a suffix which attaches to a noun phrase in agreement with another noun phrase which represents one of the core arguments in the clause.
Subordinating: a suffix which attaches to elements of a subordinate clause. Its functions are: (i) specifying temporal or logical (typically, causal and purposive) relationships between two clauses (Temporal-subordinator); (ii) indicating coreferential relationships between arguments in the two clauses (Concord-subordinator).
Derivational: a suffix which attaches to a bare stem before other case suffixses and create a new lexical item.

To illustrate this paradigm in action, take the case-system of Wanyjirra for whose description Senge invokes this system. Each of the case markers functions in the prototypical relational sense, but many extend into these additional functions:

	Derivational	Adnominal	Relational	Referential	Subordinator
	Derivational	Adnominal	Relational	Referential	C-SUB*	T-SUB*
Ergative			+	+	+
Dative		+	+		+	+
Locative			+	+		+
Allative			+			+
Purposive			+			+
Ablative			+
Elative	+	+	+	+		+
Comitative			+
Originative		+	+
Proprietive	+	+	+
Privative	+	+	+

Wanyjirra is an example of a language in which case marking occurs on all sub-constituents of the NP; see the following example in which the demonstrative, head, and quantifier of the noun phrase all receive ergative marking:

yalu-nggu

DIST-ERG

mawun-du

man-ERG

gujarra-lu

two-ERG

ngu=wula

REAL=3.AUG.SBJ

yunbarn-ana

sing-PRES

junba

corroboree.ABS

Those two men are singing corroboree.

However, this is by no means always the case or even the norm for Australian languages. For many, case-affixes are considered special-clitics (i.e. phrasal-affixes, see Anderson 2005[22]) because they have a singular fixed position within the phrase. For Bardi, the case marker usually appears on the first phrasal constituent[23] while the opposite is the case for Wangkatja (i.e. the case marker is attracted to the rightmost edge of the phrase).[24] See the following examples respectively:

Bardi[23]

Boordiji-nim

fat-ERG

niiwandi

tall

aamba

man

i-na-m-boo-na

3-TR-PST-poke-REM.PST

aril

fish

The tall fat man speared a ﬁsh.

Wangkatja[24][25]

tjitji

child

warta

tree

purlkana-ngka

big-LOC

nyinarra-nyi

sitting-?

‘The child is sitting in the big tree.’

Belarusian

An example of a Belarusian case inflection is given below, using the singular forms of the Belarusian term for "country", which belongs to Belarusian's first declension class.

краіна (nominative) "[the] country" [as a subject] (e.g. Гэта краіна знаходзіцца ў Еўропе – this country is located in Europe)
краіны (genitive) "[the] country's / [of the] country" (e.g. Урад Нідэрландаў знаходзіцца ў Гаазе, але сталіца краіны - Амстэрдам – the Dutch government is situated in The Hague, but the country's capital is Amsterdam)
краіне (dative) "[to/for the] country" [as an indirect object] (e.g. Новай краіне не засталося ніякіх прыродных рэсурсаў – there were no natural resources left for the new country)
краіну (accusative) "country" [as a direct object] (e.g. Я часта наведваю гэту краіну – I often visit this country)
краінай (instrumental) "[with the] country/[by the] country/[be a] country" (e.g. Сінгапур быў беднай краінай – Singapore was a poor country)
у краіне (locative) "[in the] country" [as a direct object] (e.g. У краіне не хапае ежы – There is not enough food in the country)

German

In German, grammatical case is largely preserved in the articles and adjectives, but nouns have lost many of their original endings. Below is an example of case inflection in German using the masculine definite article and one of the German words for "sailor".

der Seemann (nominative) "the sailor" [as a subject] (e.g. Der Seemann steht da – the sailor is standing there)
des Seemann(e)s (genitive) "the sailor's / [of] the sailor" (e.g. Der Name des Seemannes ist Otto – the name of the sailor is Otto)
dem Seemann(e) (dative) "[to/for] the sailor" [as an indirect object] (e.g. Ich gab dem Seemann ein Geschenk – I gave a present to the sailor)
den Seemann (accusative) "the sailor" [as a direct object] (e.g. Ich sah den Seemann – I saw the sailor)

An example with the feminine definite article with the German word for "woman".

die Frau (nominative) "the woman" [as a subject] (e.g. Die Frau isst - the woman eats)
der Frau (genitive) "the woman's / [of] the woman" (e.g. Die Katze der Frau ist weiß - the cat of the woman is white)
der Frau (dative) "[to/for] the woman" [as an indirect object] (e.g. Ich gab der Frau ein Geschenk - I gave a present to the woman)
die Frau (accusative) "the woman" [as a direct object] (e.g. Ich sah die Frau - I saw the woman)

An example with the neuter definite article with the German word for "book".

das Buch (nominative) "the book" [as a subject] (e.g. Das Buch ist gut - the book is good)
des Buch(e)s (genitive) "the book's/ [of] the book" (e.g. Die Seiten des Buchs sind grün - the pages of the book are green)
dem Buch (dative) "[to/for] the book" [as an indirect object] (e.g. Ich gab dem Buch einen Titel - I gave the book a title)
das Buch (accusative) "the book" [as a direct object] (e.g. Ich sah das Buch - I saw the book)

Greek

Modern Greek has four cases: nominative, genitive, accusative, and vocative. For neuters and most groups of feminines and plural masculines, the genitive case differs from the other three. Below is an example of the declension of ουρανός (sky), which has a different form in the singular of all four cases, together with the appropriate article in both the singular and the plural:

Nominative – ο ουρανός / οι ουρανοί
Genitive – του ουρανού / των ουρανών
Accusative – τον ουρανό / τους ουρανούς
Vocative – ουρανέ / ουρανοί

Ancient Greek had one additional case, the dative. At some point, it was replaced with the preposition εις, followed by the accusative. This became necessary when pronunciation simplified, merging the two long vowels eta and omega to short. The result was that dative did not sound much different from the accusative in the singular of the first two groups. However, the dative case is still used in many expressions.

With time, only the sigma of εις was left and got attached to the article, except when an article is not used and it becomes σε instead. Note that this is not a different case from the accusative.

Below is an example with the dative case of the word πόλη (city):

Nominative – ἡ πόλις / αἱ πόλεις
Genitive – τῆς πόλεως / τῶν πόλεων
Dative – τῇ πόλει / ταῖς πόλεσι(ν)
Accusative – τὴν πόλιν / τὰς πόλεις
Vocative – (ὦ) πόλι / (ὦ) πόλεις

Hindi

Hindi has two noun cases, the nominative & the oblique (or the postpositional case). The other cases are formed using the primary postpositions of Hindi with nouns and pronouns in the oblique cases. The pronoun cases that Hindi have are the nominative, accusative/dative, and three oblique cases. The Oblique - Regular case is used with the primary postpositions of Hindi, Oblique - Ergative is used with the ergative marker ne and the Oblique - Genitive case is used with the secondary (compound) postpositions.[26][27] All the noun and pronoun cases are mentioned in the table below. The cases which do not exist are constructed using primary postpositions and the regular oblique case.

Noun Cases		Masculine		Feminine
Noun Cases		Singular	Plural	Singular	Plural
Type-I	Nominative	ləɽka	ləɽke	ləɽkī	ləɽkiyã
Type-I	Oblique	ləɽke	ləɽkõ	ləɽkī	ləɽkiyõ
Type-II	Nominative	peɽ	peɽ	ʈren	ʈrenẽ
Type-II	Oblique	peɽ	peɽõ	ʈren	ʈrenõ
Type-III	Nominative	admī	admī	mata	mataẽ
Type-III	Oblique	admī	admiyõ	mata	mataõ

Pronoun Cases		Personal Pronouns					Non-Personal Pronouns
		1st Person		2nd Person			Demonstrative Pronouns				Relative Pronouns		Interrogative Pronouns
		Singular	Plural	Singular	Singular/Plural		Singular		Plural		Singular	Plural	Singular	Plural
Nominative		mɜ̃	həm	tū	tum	ap	ye	vo	ye	vo	jo		kɔn
Accusative		mujʱe	həmẽ	tujʱe	tumhẽ	—	ise	use	inhẽ	unhẽ	jise	jinhẽ	kise	kinhẽ
Dative		mujʱe	həmẽ	tujʱe	tumhẽ	—	ise	use	inhẽ	unhẽ	jise	jinhẽ	kise	kinhẽ
Oblique	Regular	mujʱ	həm	tujʱ	tum	ap	is	us	in	un	jis	jin	kis	kin
	Ergative	mɜ̃	həm	tū	tum	ap	is	us	inhõ	unhõ	jis	jinhõ	kis	kinhõ
	Genitive	mere	həmare	tere	tumhare	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Note: Hindi lacks 3rd person personal pronouns and to compensate for the loss, demonstrative pronouns are also used as 3rd person personal pronouns.

The oblique case is used exclusively with these 7 case-marking postpositions shown below. Out of these 7 postpositions, the genitive postposition ka (and also the possessive pronouns) decline to agree with the gender, number, and case of the object it shows posession of.

Case-markers
Case	Case Marker	Example	English Equivalent	Explanation
Nominative	—	ləɽka	the boy	marks the subject
Ergative	ne	ləɽke ne	the boy	ergative marker; marks the subject for transitive verbs in their perfective aspect
Accusative	ko	ləɽke ko	the boy	accusative marker; marks the direct object
Dative	ko	ləɽke ko	to the boy	dative marker; can also mark the subject[28]; dative subjects; dative subject
Instrumental	se	ləɽke se	with the boy	instrumental marker; marks the indirect object
Ablative	se	ləɽke se	from the boy	ablative, and perlative marker; "from", "through"
Genitive	ka	ləɽke ka	of the boy; boy's	genitive marker; shows possession, agrees to gender & number of the object; "of"
Adessive	mẽ	ləɽke mẽ	in the boy	superessive marker; "on", "at".
Inessive	pe	ləɽke pe	on the boy	inessive marker; "in", "inside".
Terminative	tək	ləɽke tək	till the boy	terminative marker "until", "till", up to".

Genitive Marker Declension
Case	Masculine		Feminine
Case	Singular	Plural	Singular	Plural
Nominative	ka	ke	kī
Oblique	ke		kī

Japanese

Cases in Japanese are marked by particles placed after the nouns.[29] A distinctive feature of Japanese is the presence of two cases, which are roughly equivalent to the nominative case in other languages: one representing the sentence topic, the other representing the subject. The most important case markers are the following:

Nominative - が (ga) for subject, は (wa) for the topic
Genitive - の (no)
Dative - に (ni), used for a goal or recipient of the action (e.g. "gives to someone"), or to indicate spatial placement (e.g. "to the west")
Accusative - を (o)
Lative - へ (e), used for indicating direction towards (e.g."toward some place") but leaves ambiguity as to whether it is the goal.
Ablative - から (kara), used for indicating direction away (e.g. "from some place")
Terminative - まで (made), used for the goal of a direction (e.g."up to/until some place")
Instrumental - で (de)

Korean

Cases in Korean are marked by case markers placed after the nouns. Korean grammarians recognize at least seven grammatical cases. Other information particles such as 은/는 (eun/neun; topic), 까지 (kkaji; terminative), 도 (do; "also"), 만 (man; "only"), 나/이나 (na/ina; "or") are not considered as case markers.

nominative - 이/가 (i/ga) for the subject, 께서 (kkeseo) for the subject who is respected
genitive - 의 (ui)
locative - 에 (e) "to" place or "in" place (e.g. "go to the hospital" or "I am in the hospital")

locative 2 - 에서 (eseo) "at" place (e.g. "I work at the hospital")
dative - 에게 (ege) "to" someone, 한테 (hante) "to" someone in a casual manner, 께 (kke) "to" someone who is respected
ablative - 에게서 (egeseo) "from" someone, 한테서 (hanteseo) "from" someone in a casual manner

accusative - 을/를 (eul/reul) for the direct object
lative - 로/으로 (ro/euro) "onto" something or "with" something (e.g. "it is moving toward the city" or "I wrote with a pen")

instrumental - 로써/으로써 (rosseo/eurosseo) "with" something
essive - 로서/으로서 (roseo/euroseo) being "as" something (e.g. "as a teacher, I will help you")
ablative 2 - 로부터/으로부터 (robuteo/eurobuteo) something "from" source or origin (e.g. "modern cars are developed from carriages")

comitative - 와/과 (wa/gwa), 랑/이랑 (rang/irang), 하고 (hago) together "with" someone or something
vocative - 아/야 (a/ya), 여/이여 (yeo/iyeo) "hey" someone being addressed

Latin

An example of a Latin case inflection is given below, using the singular forms of the Latin term for "cook", which belongs to Latin's second declension class.

coquus (nominative) "[the] cook" [as a subject] (e.g. coquus ibī stat – the cook is standing there)
coquī (genitive) "[the] cook's / [of the] cook" (e.g. nōmen coquī Claudius est – the cook's name is Claudius)
coquō (dative) "[to/for the] cook" [as an indirect object] (e.g. coquō dōnum dedī – I gave a present to the cook)
coquum (accusative) "[the] cook" [as a direct object] (e.g. coquum vīdī – I saw the cook)
coquō (ablative) "[by/with/from/in the] cook" [in various uses not covered by the above] (e.g. sum altior coquō – I am taller than the cook: ablative of comparison)
coque (vocative) "[you] the cook" [addressing the object] (e.g. grātiās tibi agō, coque – I thank you, cook)

Latvian

Latvian nouns have seven grammatical cases: nominative, genitive, dative, accusative, instrumental, locative and vocative. The instrumental case is always identical to the accusative in the singular and to the dative in the plural. It is used as a free-standing case (without a preposition) only in highly restricted contexts in modern Latvian.

An example of a Latvian case inflection is given below, using the singular forms of the Latvian term for "man", which belongs to the first declension class.

Nominative: vīrs
Genitive: vīra
Dative: vīram
Accusative: vīru
Instrumental: ar vīru
Locative: vīrā
Vocative: vīr

Lithuanian

In Lithuanian, only the inflection usually changes in the seven different grammatical cases:

Nominative (vardininkas): šuo – Tai yra šuo – "This is a dog."
Genitive (kilmininkas): šuns – Tomas paėmė šuns kaulą – "Tom took the dog's bone."
Dative (naudininkas): šuniui – Jis davė kaulą kitam šuniui – "He gave the bone to another dog."
Accusative (galininkas): šunį – Jis nuprausė šunį – "He washed the dog."
Instrumental (įnagininkas): šunimi – Jis šunimi išgąsdino kates – He scared the cats with (using) the dog.
Locative (vietininkas): šunyje – Susitiksime „Baltame šunyje“ – "We'll meet at the White Dog (Cafe)."
Vocative (šauksmininkas): šunie – Jis sušuko: Ei, šunie! – "He shouted: Hey, dog!"

Malayalam

Vocative forms are given in parentheses after the nominative, as the only pronominal vocatives that are used are the third person ones, which only occur in compounds[30].

	Singular				Plural
Case	First person	Second person	Third person (masculine)	Third person (feminine)	First person (exclusive)	First person (inclusive)	Second person	Third Person
Nominative	ñāṉ	nī, ningal	avaṉ (voc. avaṉē)	avaḷ (voc. avaḷē)	ñaṅgaḷ	nām/ nammaḷ	niṅṅaḷ	avar (voc. avarē)
Genitive	eṉṯe (also eṉ, eṉṉuṭe)	niṉṯe (also niṉ, niṉṉuṭe)	avaṉṯe (also avaṉuṭe)	avaḷuṭe	ñaṅgaḷuṭe (also ñaṅguṭe)	nammuṭe	niṅgaḷuṭe	avaruṭe
Dative	eṉikku	niṉakku	avaṉu	avaḷkku	ñammaḷkku	namukku	niṅgaḷkku	avarkku
Accusative	eṉṉe	niṉṉe	avaṉe	avaḷe	ñaṅgaḷe	nammale	niṅgaḷe	avaru
Instrumental	eṉṉāl	niṉṉāl	avaṉāl	avaḷāl	ñaṅgaḷāl (also ñaṅṅāl)	nammāl	niṅgaḷāl (also niṅṅāl)	avarāl
Locative	eṉṉil (also eṅkal)	niṉṉil (also niṅkal)	avaṉil (also avaṅkal)	avaḷil (also avaḷkal)	ñaṅgaḷil	nammil	niṅgaḷil	avaril (also avaṟkal)
Sociative	eṉṉōṭu	niṉṉōṭu	avaṉōṭu	avaḷōṭu	ñaṅgaḷōṭu	nammōṭu	niṅgaḷōṭu	avarōṭu

Polish

An example of a Polish case inflection is given below, using the singular forms of the Polish terms for "human" (człowiek) and "monkey" (małpa)

Nominative (mianownik): człowiek, małpa
Genitive (dopełniacz): człowieka, małpy
Dative (celownik): człowiekowi, małpie
Accusative (biernik): człowieka, małpę
Instrumental (narzędnik): człowiekiem, małpą
Locative (miejscownik): człowieku, małpie
Vocative (wołacz): człowieku (or człowiecze), małpo

Hungarian

Hungarian declension is relatively simple with regular suffixes attached to the vast majority of nouns. The following table lists all of the cases used in Hungarian.

**ház** – house, kettő – two
Case	Meaning	Suffix	Example	Meaning of the example
Nominative case	subject	∅	ház	house (as a subject)
Accusative case	direct object	-ot/(-at)/-et/-öt/-t	házat	house (as an object)
Dative case	indirect object	-nak/-nek	háznak	to the house
Genitive case	possession	-é	házé	of the house (belonging to)
Instrumental-comitative case	with	-val/-vel (Assim.)	házzal	with the house
Causal-final case	for, for the purpose of	-ért	házért	for the house
Translative case	into (used to show transformation)	-vá/-vé (Assim.)	házzá	[turn] into a house
Terminative case	as far as, up to	-ig	házig	as far as the house
Illative case	into (location)	-ba/-be	házba	into the house
Adessive case	at	-nál/-nél	háznál	at the house
Ablative case	from	-tól/-töl	háztól	from the house
Sublative case	onto (movement towards a thing)	-ra/-re	házra	onto the house
Superessive case	on/upon (static position)	-n/-on/-en/-ön	házon	on top of the house
Delative case	from (movement away from a thing)	-ról/-röl	házról	away from the house
Temporal case	at (used to indicate time or moment)	-kor	kettőkor	at two (o'clock)
Sociative case	with (archaic, nowadays slightly pejorative)	-stul/-stül	házastul	with the house
Types of	types or variants of a thing	-féle	kettőféle ház	two types of houses

Romanian

Romanian is the only modern major Romance language with a case system for all nouns, whereas all other Romance languages dropped the cases for nouns replacing them by prepositions. An example of Romanian case inflection is given below, using the singular form of the word "boy":

Băiat(ul) (nominative) "(the) boy" [as a subject] (e.g. Băiatul a stat acasă – The boy stayed home.)
Băiat(ul) (accusative) "(the) boy" [as a direct object] (e.g. L-am văzut aseară pe băiat – I saw the boy last night.)
Băiat(ului) (genitive) "(the) boy's / of a/the boy" (e.g. Bicicleta băiatului s-a stricat – The boy's bike broke down.)
Băiat(ului) (dative) "to a/the boy" (e.g. I-am dat un cadou băiatului – I gave the boy a gift.)
Băiat(ule!) (vocative) "Boy!" (e.g. Stai acasă, băiatule! – Stay at home, boy!)

Russian

An example of a Russian case inflection is given below (with explicit stress marks), using the singular forms of the Russian term for "sailor", which belongs to Russian's first declension class.

моря́к (nominative) "[the] sailor" [as a subject] (e.g. Там стоит моряк: The sailor is standing there)
морякá (genitive) "[the] sailor's / [of the] sailor" (e.g. Сын моряка — художник: The sailor's son is an artist)
моряку́ (dative) "[to/for the] sailor" [as an indirect object] (e.g. Моряку подарили подарок: (They/Someone) gave a present to the sailor)
морякá (accusative) "[the] sailor" [as a direct object] (e.g. Вижу моряка: (I) see the sailor)
моряко́м (instrumental) "[with/by the] sailor" [as a direct object] (e.g. Дружу с моряком: (I) have a friendship with the sailor)
о/на/в моряке́ (prepositional) "[about/on/in the] sailor" [as a direct object] (e.g. Думаю о моряке: (I) think about the sailor)

Up to ten additional cases are identified by linguists, although today all of them are either incomplete (do not apply to all nouns or do not form full word paradigm with all combinations of gender and number) or degenerate (appear identical to one of the main six cases). The most recognized additional cases are locative (в лесу́, на мосту́, в слеза́х), partitive (ча́ю, са́хару, песку́), and two forms of vocative — old (Го́споди, Бо́же, о́тче) and neo-vocative (Маш, пап, ребя́т). Sometimes, so called count-form (for some countable nouns after numerals) is considered to be a sub-case. See details.

Sanskrit

Grammatical case was analyzed extensively in Sanskrit. The grammarian Pāṇini identified six semantic roles or kāraka,[31] which by default are related to the following eight Sanskrit cases in order:[32]

Sanskrit cases
Order	Default thematic role	English case	Example with राम (singular, dual, plural)
Case 1 प्रथमा	Kartṛ (कर्तृकारकम्)	Nominative	रामः (rāmaḥ), रामौ (rāmau), रामाः (rāmāḥ)
Case 2 द्वितीया	Karman (कर्मकारकम्)	Accusative	रामम् (rāmam), रामौ (rāmau), रामान् (rāmān)
Case 3 तृतीया	Karaṇa (करणकारकम्)	Instrumental	रामेण (rāmeṇa), रामाभ्याम् (rāmābhyām), रामैः (rāmaiḥ)
Case 4 चतुर्थी	Sampradāna (सम्प्रदानकारकम्)	Dative	रामाय (rāmāya), रामाभ्याम् (rāmābhyām), रामेभ्यः (rāmebhyaḥ)
Case 5 पञ्चमी	Apādāna (अपादानकारकम्)	Ablative	रामात् (rāmāt), रामाभ्याम् (rāmābhyām), रामेभ्यः (rāmebhyaḥ)
Case 6 षष्ठी	Sambandha	Genitive	रामस्य (rāmasya), रामयोः (rāmayoḥ), रामाणाम् (rāmāṇām)
Case 7 सप्तमी	Adhikaraṇa (अधिकरणकारकम्)	Locative	रामे (rāme), रामयोः (rāmayoḥ), रामेषु (rāmeṣhu)
Case 8 सम्बोधन	Sambodhana (सम्बोधनकारकम्)	Vocative	हे राम (he rāma), हे रामौ (he rāmau), हे रामाः (he rāmāḥ)

For example, in the following sentence leaf is the agent (kartā, nominative case), tree is the source (apādāna, ablative case), and ground is the locus (adhikaraṇa, locative case). The declensions are reflected in the morphemes -āt, -am, and -au respectively.

vṛkṣ-āt	parṇ-am	bhūm-au	patati
from the tree	a leaf	to the ground	falls

However, the cases may be deployed for other than the default thematic roles. A notable example is the passive construction. In the following sentence, Devadatta is the kartā, but appears in the instrumental case, and rice, the karman, object, is in the nominative case (as subject of the verb). The declensions are reflected in the morphemes -ena and -am.

devadatt-ena	odan-am	pacyati
by Devadatta	the rice	is cooked

Tamil

The Tamil case system is analyzed in native and missionary grammars as consisting of a finite number of cases.[33][34] The usual treatment of Tamil case (Arden 1942)[35] is one in which there are seven cases: nominative (first case), accusative (second case), instrumental (third), dative (fourth), ablative (fifth), genitive (sixth), and locative (seventh). In traditional analyses, there is always a clear distinction made between post-positional morphemes and case endings. The vocative is sometimes given a place in the case system as an eighth case, but vocative forms do not participate in usual morphophonemic alternations and do not govern the use of any postpositions. Modern grammarians, however, argue that this eight-case classification is coarse and artificial[34] and that Tamil usage is best understood if each suffix or combination of suffixes is seen as marking a separate case.[36]

Tamil	English	Significance	Usual suffixes	Suffixes in Tamil	Example
First case(எழுவாய் வேற்றுமை)	Nominative	Subject of sentence	[Zero]		mannan (மன்னன்)
Second case (செயப்படுபொருள் வேற்றுமை)	Accusative	Object of action	-ai	ஐ	mannanai (மன்னனை)
Third case (கருவி/துணை வேற்றுமை)	Instrumental, Social	Means by which action is done (Instrumental), Association, or means by which action is done (Social)	-al, -udan, -kondu	ஆல், உடன், கொண்டு	mannanaal, mannanudan, mannanOdu, (மன்னனால், மன்னனுடன், மன்னனோடு)
Fourth case	Dative	Object to whom action is performed, Object for whom action is performed	(u)kku. poruttu, aaga	கு, பொருட்டு, ஆக	mannanukku, mannanin poruttu, mannanukkaaga (மன்னனுக்கு, மன்னனின் பொருட்டு, மன்னனுக்காக)
Fifth case	Ablative of motion from	Motion from an animate/inanimate object	-in, -il, -ilrundu	இன், இல், இருந்து	mannanin, mannanil, mannanilirundu (மன்னனின், மன்னனில், மன்னனிலிருந்து)
Sixth case	Genitive	Possessive	athu, udaiya	அது, உடைய	mannanadu, mannanudaiya (மன்னனது, மன்னனுடைய)
Seventh case	Locative	Place in which, On the person of (animate) in the presence of	-il, -idam; kaṇ (Old Tamil)	இல், இடம்; கண் (Old Tamil)	vīṭṭil, mannanidam (வீட்டில், மன்னனிடம்); பூரியார்கண் = கீழோரிடம்; பற்றற்றகண்ணும் = செல்வமில்லாத நிலையிலும்
Eighth case (விளி வேற்றுமை)	Vocative	Addressing, calling	e, a	ஏ, ஆ	mannanE, mannavaa (மன்னனே, மன்னவா)

Telugu

Telugu has eight cases.

	Telugu	English	Significance	Usual Suffixes	Transliteration of Suffixes
(I)	Prathamā Vibhakti (ప్రథమా విభక్తి)	Nominative	Subject of sentence	డు, ము, వు, లు	ḍu, mu, vu, lu
(II)	Dvitīyā Vibhakti (ద్వితీయా విభక్తి)	Accusative	Object of action	నిన్, నున్, లన్, కూర్చి, గురించి	nin, nun, lan, kūrchi, gurinchi
(III)	Trutīyā Vibhakti (తృతీయా విభక్తి)	Instrumental, Social	Means by which action is done (Instrumental); Association, or means by which action is done (Social)	చేతన్, చేన్, తోడన్, తోన్	chētan, chēn, tōḍan, tōn
(IV)	Chaturthi Vibhakti (చతుర్థి విభక్తి)	Dative	Object to whom action is performed, object for whom action is performed	కొఱకున్, కై	korakun, kai
(V)	Panchamī Vibhakti (పంచమీ విభక్తి)	Ablative of motion from	Motion from an animate/inanimate object	వలనన్, కంటెన్, పట్టి	valanan, kaṃṭen, paṭṭi
(VI)	Shashthī Vibhakti (షష్ఠీ విభక్తి)	Genitive	Possessive	కిన్, కున్, యొక్క, లోన్, లోపలన్	kin, kun, yokka, lōn, lōpalan
(VII)	Saptamī Vibhakti (సప్తమీ విభక్తి)	Locative	Place in which, On the person of (animate) in the presence of	అందున్, నన్	aṃdun, nan
(VIII)	Sambodhanā Prathamā Vibhakti (సంబోధనా ప్రథమా విభక్తి)	Vocative	Addressing, calling	ఓ, ఓయీ, ఓరీ, ఓసీ	ō, ōī, ōrī, ōsī

Turkish

Modern Turkish has five cases (In Turkish İsmin hâlleri).

Accusative[lower-alpha 2] What? Who?	Dative[lower-alpha 3][lower-alpha 4][lower-alpha 5] To who?	Locative[lower-alpha 6][lower-alpha 7] Where? Who?	Ablative[lower-alpha 8][lower-alpha 9] Where from? From who? Why?	Genitive Whose? What's wrong?
çiçeği / the flower	çiçeğe / to flower	çiçekte / in flower	çiçekten / from flower	çiçeğin / of flower

The accusative can exist not only in the noun but also in the verb. For example, Arkadaşlar bize gelmeyi düşünüyorlar./Friends are thinking of coming to us.

The dative can exist not only in the noun but also in the verb. For example, Bol bol kitap okumaya çalışıyorum./I try to read a lot of books [37].

Ukrainian

An example of a Ukrainian case inflection is given below, using the singular forms of the Ukrainian word "мрія" ('dream', 'ambition', 'inspiration'), which is a soft feminine noun of the first declension class.

мрія (nominative) "[a] dream" (e.g. У мене є мрія. – I have a dream.)
мрії (genitive) "[a] dream's / [of a] dream" (e.g. Я не можу осягнути межі твоєї мрії. – I cannot fathom the limits of your dream.)
мрії (dative) "[to/for a] dream" (e.g. Своїй мрії ти повинен дати ім`я. – You have to give your dream a name.)
мрію (accusative) "dream" (e.g. Я не можу просто забути свою мрію. – I can't just forget my dream.)
мрією (instrumental) "[with a] dream/[by a] dream" (e.g. Молоді люді об`єднані спільною мрією. – Young people are united by a common dream.)
на/у мрії (locative) "[on/in a] dream" [as a direct object] (e.g. Ця книга базується на мрії її автора. – This book is based on its author's dream.)
мріє (vocative) "[dream" [as a direct object] (e.g. Не полишай мене, моя мріє! – Don't leave me, my dream!)

Evolution

As languages evolve, case systems change. In early Ancient Greek, for example, the genitive and ablative cases became combined, giving five cases, rather than the six retained in Latin. In modern Hindi, the Sanskrit cases have been reduced to three: a direct case (for subjects and direct objects) and oblique case, and a vocative case.[38][39] In English, apart from the pronouns discussed above, case has vanished altogether except for the possessive/non-possessive dichotomy in nouns.

The evolution of the treatment of case relationships can be circular.[4]^{:pp.167–174} Adpositions can become unstressed and sound like they are an unstressed syllable of a neighboring word. A postposition can thus merge into the stem of a head noun, developing various forms depending on the phonological shape of the stem. Affixes can then be subject to various phonological processes such as assimilation, vowel centering to the schwa, phoneme loss, and fusion, and these processes can reduce or even eliminate the distinctions between cases. Languages can then compensate for the resulting loss of function by creating adpositions, thus coming full circle.

Recent experiments in agent-based modeling have shown how case systems can emerge and evolve in a population of language users.[40] The experiments demonstrate that language users may introduce new case markers to reduce the cognitive effort required for semantic interpretation, hence facilitating communication through language. Case markers then become generalized through analogical reasoning and reuse.

Linguistic typology

Morphosyntactic alignment

Languages are categorized into several case systems, based on their morphosyntactic alignment—how they group verb agents and patients into cases:

Nominative–accusative (or simply accusative): The argument (subject) of an intransitive verb is in the same case as the agent (subject) of a transitive verb; this case is then called the nominative case, with the patient (direct object) of a transitive verb being in the accusative case.
Ergative–absolutive (or simply ergative): The argument (subject) of an intransitive verb is in the same case as the patient (direct object) of a transitive verb; this case is then called the absolutive case, with the agent (subject) of a transitive verb being in the ergative case.
Ergative–accusative (or tripartite): The argument (subject) of an intransitive verb is in its own case (the intransitive case), separate from that of the agent (subject) or patient (direct object) of a transitive verb (which is in the ergative case or accusative case, respectively).
Active–stative (or simply active): The argument (subject) of an intransitive verb can be in one of two cases; if the argument is an agent, as in "He ate", then it is in the same case as the agent (subject) of a transitive verb (sometimes called the agentive case), and if it is a patient, as in "He tripped", then it is in the same case as the patient (direct object) of a transitive verb (sometimes called the patientive case).
Trigger: One noun in a sentence is the topic or focus. This noun is in the trigger case, and information elsewhere in the sentence (for example a verb affix in Tagalog) specifies the role of the trigger. The trigger may be identified as the agent, patient, etc. Other nouns may be inflected for case, but the inflections are overloaded; for example, in Tagalog, the subject and object of a verb are both expressed in the genitive case when they are not in the trigger case.

The following are systems that some languages use to mark case instead of, or in addition to, declension:

Positional: Nouns are not inflected for case; the position of a noun in the sentence expresses its case.
Adpositional: Nouns are accompanied by words that mark case.

Language families

With a few exceptions, most languages in the Finno-Ugric family make extensive use of cases. Finnish has 15 cases according to the traditional description (or up to 30 depending on the interpretation).[41] However, only 12 are commonly used in speech (see Finnish noun cases and Finnish locative system). Estonian has 14 (see Estonian locative system) and Hungarian has 18, both with additional archaic cases used for some words.
Turkic and Mongolic languages also exhibit complex case systems. Korean and Japanese, shared certain similarities, linguists proposed a Polynesian family and reconstructed its case system; although the hypothesis had been largely discredited.
The Tsez language, a Northeast Caucasian language, has 64 cases.
The original version of John Quijada's constructed language Ithkuil has 81 noun cases,[42] and its descendant Ilaksh and Ithkuil after the 2011 revision both have 96 noun cases.[43][44]

The lemma form of words, which is the form chosen by convention as the canonical form of a word, is usually the most unmarked or basic case, which is typically the nominative, trigger, or absolutive case, whichever a language may have.

gollark: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f2/Green%27s_function_animation.gif

gollark: I am currently trying to extract useful insight from the detailed but also irritatingly unhelpful on some questions UCAS reports from 2 years ago.

gollark: How awful.

gollark: Prayer... project?

gollark: That would be mean, though.

Notes

The status of the possessive as an affix or a clitic is the subject of debate.[11][12] It differs from the noun inflection of languages such as German, in that the genitive ending may attach to the last word of the phrase. To account for this, the possessive can be analysed, for instance as a clitic construction (an "enclitic postposition"[13]) or as an inflection[14][15] of the last word of a phrase ("edge inflection").[16]
Hayatı sevmek, gazeteyi okumak, camları silmek, ödevini yapmak, sesini duymak, kapıyı açmak, üzümü toplamak. Not: Saat yediyi beş geçiyor. Üçü çeyrek geçiyor.
Saat dokuza on var. On ikiye çeyrek var. Kaç liraya? Kaça?
Edatlardan –e ile bağlananlar: bize göre, bize karşı, her şeye rağmen, kışa doğru, o konuya dair, size ait, yağmura rağmen, iyiliklerine karşılık
ben, senperson pronouns: Ben-e> bana, sen-e>sana
Kesir sayları kurar: Yüzde yirmi faiz, dörtte bir elma, yüzde yetmiş devam, binde bir ihtimal, yüzde on beş indirim.
-de+ek-fill örneği: –Yarın evde misiniz? – Hayır, okuldayım. – Şimdi neredesiniz? - Şu anda dersteyiz. Otur-mak-ta-dır (oturuyor), otur-mak-ta-y-dı (oturuyordu), otur-mak-ta-y-mış (oturuyormuş), otur-mak-ta-y-sa (oturuyorsa).
Some prepositions of name connects with –den: –den önce, - den sonra, -den dolayı, - den beri, -den itibaren, -den başka vb. kahvaltıdan önce, yemekten sonra, yağmurdan dolayı, sabahtan beri, bügünden itibaren, Ayşe’den başka.
-den+ek-fill (ait olma bildirir): Kimlerdensiniz? Ahmet te bizdendir. (Bizim takımdandır.) Bulgaristan göçmenlerindenmiş. Sizin öğrencilerinizdenim.

References

Clackson 2007, p. 91.
The Chambers Dictionary, 11th edition
Including Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, Malayalam, etc.
Blake, Barry J. Case. Cambridge University Press: 2001.
"Linguaggio nell'Enciclopedia Treccani".
Michael, Ian (2010-06-10). English Grammatical Categories: And the Tradition to 1800. ISBN 9780521143264.
Frede, Michael (1994). "The Stoic Notion of a Grammatical Case". Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies. 39: 13–24. JSTOR 43646836.
Harper, Douglas. "case". Online Etymology Dictionary.
"L. cāsus used to translate Gr. πτῶσις lit. 'falling, fall'. By Aristotle πτῶσις was applied to any derived, inflected, or extended form of the simple ὄνομα or ῥῆμα (i.e. the nominative of nouns, the present indicative of verbs), such as the oblique cases of nouns, the variations of adjectives due to gender and comparison, also the derived adverb (e.g. δικαίως was a πτῶσις of δίκαιος), the other tenses and moods of the verb, including its interrogative form. The grammarians, following the Stoics, restricted πτῶσις to nouns, and included the nominative under the designation". "case". Oxford English Dictionary (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. September 2005. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
Slavic Languages on quickia.com Archived 2009-11-21 at the Wayback Machine
Hudson, Richard (2013). "A cognitive analysis of John's hat". In Börjars, Kersti; Denison, David; Scott, Alan (eds.). Morphosyntactic Categories and the Expression of Possession. John Benjamins Publishing Company. pp. 123–148. ISBN 9789027273000.
Börjars, Kersti; Denison, David; Krajewski, Grzegorz; Scott, Alan (2013). "Expression of Possession in English". In Börjars, Kersti; Denison, David; Scott, Alan (eds.). Morphosyntactic Categories and the Expression of Possession. John Benjamins Publishing Company. pp. 149–176. ISBN 9789027273000.
Quirk, Randolph; Greenbaum, Sidney; Leech, Geoffrey; Svartvik, Jan (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Harlow: Longman. p. 328. ISBN 978-0-582-51734-9. [the -s ending is] more appropriately described as an enclitic postposition'
Greenbaum, Sidney (1996). The Oxford English Grammar. Oxford University Press. pp. 109–110. ISBN 978-0-19-861250-6. In speech the genitive is signalled in singular nouns by an inflection that has the same pronunciation variants as for plural nouns in the common case
Quirk, Randolph; Greenbaum, Sidney; Leech, Geoffrey; Svartik, Jan (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Longman. p. 319. In writing, the inflection of regular nouns is realized in the singular by apostrophe + s (boy's), and in the regular plural by the apostrophe following the plural s (boys')
Payne, John; Huddleston, Rodney (2002). "Nouns and noun phrases". In Huddleston, Rodney; Pullum, Geoffrey (eds.). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 479–481. ISBN 978-0-521-43146-0. We conclude that both head and phrasal genitives involve case inflection. With head genitives it is always a noun that inflects, while the phrasal genitive can apply to words of most classes.
The grammar of Dionysios Thrax. Translated by Tomas Davidson. St. Loius: Studley. 1874. p. 10.
Malchukov, Andrej (2010). ""Quirky" case: rare phenomena in case-marking and their implications for a theory of typological distributions". Rethinking Universals: How Rarities Affect Linguistic Theory: 139–168.
Frank Beetham, Learning Greek with Plato, Bristol Phoenix Press, 2007.
Senge, Chikako. 2015. A Grammar of Wanyjirra, a language of Northern Australia. The Australian National University Ph.D.
Dench, Alan; Evans, Nicholas (1988-06-01). "Multiple case‐marking in Australian languages". Australian Journal of Linguistics. 8 (1): 1–47. doi:10.1080/07268608808599390. ISSN 0726-8602.
Anderson, Stephen. 2005. Aspects of the Theory of Clitics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199279906.001.0001. http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199279906.001.0001/acprof-9780199279906 (9 June, 2020).
Bowern, Claire, 1977- (2013). A grammar of Bardi. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. ISBN 978-3-11-027818-7. OCLC 848086054.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
Shoulson, Oliver (2019). "Case Suffixes as Special Clitics in Wangkatja". doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.10204.00649. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
Wangkatja dictionary 2008. (2008). Port Hedland, W.A: Wangka Maya Pilbara Aboriginal Language Centre.
Corbett, Greville G.; Noonan, Michael (2008). Case and Grammatical Relations: Studies in honor of Bernard Comrie. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Jhn Benjamins Publishing Company. p. 51.
Spencer, Andrew (2020-07-21). "CASE IN HINDI". Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
Bhatt, Rajesh (2003). Experiencer subjects. Handout from MIT course “Structure of the Modern Indo-Aryan Languages”.
Takahashi, Tarou; et al. (2010). A Japanese Grammar (in Japanese) (4 ed.). Japan: Hitsuji Shobou. p. 27. ISBN 978-4-89476-244-2.
Malayalam grammar#Personal pronouns
Pieter Cornelis Verhagen, Handbook of oriental studies: India. A history of Sanskrit grammatical literature in Tibet, Volume 2, BRILL, 2001, ISBN 90-04-11882-9, p. 281.
W.D. Whitney, Sanskrit Grammar
"The Tamil Case System" (PDF). Ccat.sas.upenn.edu. Retrieved 20 November 2014.
K. V. Zvelebil (1972). "Dravidian Case-Suffixes: Attempt at a Reconstruction". Journal of the American Oriental Society. 92 (2): 272–276. doi:10.2307/600654. JSTOR 600654.
Arden, A.H. 1942, repr. 1969. A Progressive Grammar of the Tamil Language. Madras: Christian Literature Society.
Harold F. Schiffman (June 1998). "Standardization or restandardization: The case for "Standard" Spoken Tamil". Language in Society. 27 (3): 359–385. doi:10.1017/S0047404598003030.
2. accusative affix -mayı 3. dative affix -maya;
R. S. McGregor, Outline of Hindi Grammar, Oxford University Press, 1972.
Spencer, A. (2005). Case in Hindi. In Proceedings of the LFG05 Conference. Retrieved from http://web.stanford.edu/group/cslipublications/cslipublications/LFG/10/lfg05.html
Remi van Trijp, "The Evolution of Case Systems for Marking Event Structure Archived 2013-06-18 at the Wayback Machine". In: Steels, Luc (Ed.), Experiments in Cultural Language Evolution, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2012, p. 169-205.
"Finnish Grammar – Adverbial cases". Users.jyu.fi. Retrieved 15 September 2014.
"A Philosophical Grammar of Ithkuil, a Constructed Language – Chapter 4: Case Morphology". Ithkuil.net. Archived from the original on June 8, 2009. Retrieved 15 September 2014.
"Chapter 4". Archived from the original on March 12, 2009. Retrieved 15 September 2014.
"A Grammar of the Ithkuil Language – Chapter 4: Case Morphology". Ithkuil.net. Retrieved 15 September 2014.

General references

Clackson, James (2007). Indo-European linguistics: an introduction. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781139467346.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
Ivan G. Iliev (2007) On the Nature of Grammatical Case ... (Case and Vocativeness)

Iliev, Iv. The Russian Genitive of Negation and Its Japanese Counterpart. International Journal of Russian Studies. 1, 2018

External links

Grammatical Features Inventory – DOI: 10.15126/SMG.18/1.04
World Atlas of Language Structures Online

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.

[17] The status of the possessive as an affix or a clitic is the subject of debate.[11][12] It differs from the noun inflection of languages such as German, in that the genitive ending may attach to the last word of the phrase. To account for this, the possessive can be analysed, for instance as a clitic construction (an "enclitic postposition"[13]) or as an inflection[14][15] of the last word of a phrase ("edge inflection").[16]

[38] Hayatı sevmek, gazeteyi okumak, camları silmek, ödevini yapmak, sesini duymak, kapıyı açmak, üzümü toplamak. Not: Saat yediyi beş geçiyor. Üçü çeyrek geçiyor.

[39] Saat dokuza on var. On ikiye çeyrek var. Kaç liraya? Kaça?

[40] Edatlardan –e ile bağlananlar: bize göre, bize karşı, her şeye rağmen, kışa doğru, o konuya dair, size ait, yağmura rağmen, iyiliklerine karşılık

[41] ben, senperson pronouns: Ben-e> bana, sen-e>sana

[42] Kesir sayları kurar: Yüzde yirmi faiz, dörtte bir elma, yüzde yetmiş devam, binde bir ihtimal, yüzde on beş indirim.

[43] -de+ek-fill örneği: –Yarın evde misiniz? – Hayır, okuldayım. – Şimdi neredesiniz? - Şu anda dersteyiz. Otur-mak-ta-dır (oturuyor), otur-mak-ta-y-dı (oturuyordu), otur-mak-ta-y-mış (oturuyormuş), otur-mak-ta-y-sa (oturuyorsa).

[44] Some prepositions of name connects with –den: –den önce, - den sonra, -den dolayı, - den beri, -den itibaren, -den başka vb. kahvaltıdan önce, yemekten sonra, yağmurdan dolayı, sabahtan beri, bügünden itibaren, Ayşe’den başka.

[45] -den+ek-fill (ait olma bildirir): Kimlerdensiniz? Ahmet te bizdendir. (Bizim takımdandır.) Bulgaristan göçmenlerindenmiş. Sizin öğrencilerinizdenim.

[FOOTNOTEClackson200791-1] Clackson 2007, p. 91.

[2] The Chambers Dictionary, 11th edition

[3] Including Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, Malayalam, etc.

[Blake-4] Blake, Barry J. Case. Cambridge University Press: 2001.

[treccani-5] "Linguaggio nell'Enciclopedia Treccani".

[6] Michael, Ian (2010-06-10). English Grammatical Categories: And the Tradition to 1800. ISBN 9780521143264.

[7] Frede, Michael (1994). "The Stoic Notion of a Grammatical Case". Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies. 39: 13–24. JSTOR 43646836.

[8] Harper, Douglas. "case". Online Etymology Dictionary.

[9] "L. cāsus used to translate Gr. πτῶσις lit. 'falling, fall'. By Aristotle πτῶσις was applied to any derived, inflected, or extended form of the simple ὄνομα or ῥῆμα (i.e. the nominative of nouns, the present indicative of verbs), such as the oblique cases of nouns, the variations of adjectives due to gender and comparison, also the derived adverb (e.g. δικαίως was a πτῶσις of δίκαιος), the other tenses and moods of the verb, including its interrogative form. The grammarians, following the Stoics, restricted πτῶσις to nouns, and included the nominative under the designation". "case". Oxford English Dictionary (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. September 2005. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)

[10] Slavic Languages on quickia.com Archived 2009-11-21 at the Wayback Machine

[Hudson_2013-11] Hudson, Richard (2013). "A cognitive analysis of John's hat". In Börjars, Kersti; Denison, David; Scott, Alan (eds.). Morphosyntactic Categories and the Expression of Possession. John Benjamins Publishing Company. pp. 123–148. ISBN 9789027273000.

[Börjars_2013-12] Börjars, Kersti; Denison, David; Krajewski, Grzegorz; Scott, Alan (2013). "Expression of Possession in English". In Börjars, Kersti; Denison, David; Scott, Alan (eds.). Morphosyntactic Categories and the Expression of Possession. John Benjamins Publishing Company. pp. 149–176. ISBN 9789027273000.

[Quirk_group_genitive-13] Quirk, Randolph; Greenbaum, Sidney; Leech, Geoffrey; Svartvik, Jan (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Harlow: Longman. p. 328. ISBN 978-0-582-51734-9. [the -s ending is] more appropriately described as an enclitic postposition'

[Oxford_English_Grammar,_Case-14] Greenbaum, Sidney (1996). The Oxford English Grammar. Oxford University Press. pp. 109–110. ISBN 978-0-19-861250-6. In speech the genitive is signalled in singular nouns by an inflection that has the same pronunciation variants as for plural nouns in the common case

[15] Quirk, Randolph; Greenbaum, Sidney; Leech, Geoffrey; Svartik, Jan (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Longman. p. 319. In writing, the inflection of regular nouns is realized in the singular by apostrophe + s (boy's), and in the regular plural by the apostrophe following the plural s (boys')

[Huddleston_phrasal_genitive-16] Payne, John; Huddleston, Rodney (2002). "Nouns and noun phrases". In Huddleston, Rodney; Pullum, Geoffrey (eds.). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 479–481. ISBN 978-0-521-43146-0. We conclude that both head and phrasal genitives involve case inflection. With head genitives it is always a noun that inflects, while the phrasal genitive can apply to words of most classes.

[18] The grammar of Dionysios Thrax. Translated by Tomas Davidson. St. Loius: Studley. 1874. p. 10.

[19] Malchukov, Andrej (2010). ""Quirky" case: rare phenomena in case-marking and their implications for a theory of typological distributions". Rethinking Universals: How Rarities Affect Linguistic Theory: 139–168.

[Beetham-20] Frank Beetham, Learning Greek with Plato, Bristol Phoenix Press, 2007.

[:0-21] Senge, Chikako. 2015. A Grammar of Wanyjirra, a language of Northern Australia. The Australian National University Ph.D.

[22] Dench, Alan; Evans, Nicholas (1988-06-01). "Multiple case‐marking in Australian languages". Australian Journal of Linguistics. 8 (1): 1–47. doi:10.1080/07268608808599390. ISSN 0726-8602.

[23] Anderson, Stephen. 2005. Aspects of the Theory of Clitics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199279906.001.0001. http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199279906.001.0001/acprof-9780199279906 (9 June, 2020).

[:1-24] Bowern, Claire, 1977- (2013). A grammar of Bardi. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. ISBN 978-3-11-027818-7. OCLC 848086054.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

[:2-25] Shoulson, Oliver (2019). "Case Suffixes as Special Clitics in Wangkatja". doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.10204.00649. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)

[26] Wangkatja dictionary 2008. (2008). Port Hedland, W.A: Wangka Maya Pilbara Aboriginal Language Centre.

[27] Corbett, Greville G.; Noonan, Michael (2008). Case and Grammatical Relations: Studies in honor of Bernard Comrie. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Jhn Benjamins Publishing Company. p. 51.

[28] Spencer, Andrew (2020-07-21). "CASE IN HINDI". Cite journal requires |journal= (help)

[:3-29] Bhatt, Rajesh (2003). Experiencer subjects. Handout from MIT course “Structure of the Modern Indo-Aryan Languages”.

[tarou_takahashi-30] Takahashi, Tarou; et al. (2010). A Japanese Grammar (in Japanese) (4 ed.). Japan: Hitsuji Shobou. p. 27. ISBN 978-4-89476-244-2.

[31] Malayalam grammar#Personal pronouns

[32] Pieter Cornelis Verhagen, Handbook of oriental studies: India. A history of Sanskrit grammatical literature in Tibet, Volume 2, BRILL, 2001, ISBN 90-04-11882-9, p. 281.

[33] W.D. Whitney, Sanskrit Grammar

[34] "The Tamil Case System" (PDF). Ccat.sas.upenn.edu. Retrieved 20 November 2014.

[JSTOR600654-35] K. V. Zvelebil (1972). "Dravidian Case-Suffixes: Attempt at a Reconstruction". Journal of the American Oriental Society. 92 (2): 272–276. doi:10.2307/600654. JSTOR 600654.

[36] Arden, A.H. 1942, repr. 1969. A Progressive Grammar of the Tamil Language. Madras: Christian Literature Society.

[37] Harold F. Schiffman (June 1998). "Standardization or restandardization: The case for "Standard" Spoken Tamil". Language in Society. 27 (3): 359–385. doi:10.1017/S0047404598003030.

[46] 2. accusative affix -mayı 3. dative affix -maya;

[47] R. S. McGregor, Outline of Hindi Grammar, Oxford University Press, 1972.

[48] Spencer, A. (2005). Case in Hindi. In Proceedings of the LFG05 Conference. Retrieved from http://web.stanford.edu/group/cslipublications/cslipublications/LFG/10/lfg05.html

[49] Remi van Trijp, "The Evolution of Case Systems for Marking Event Structure Archived 2013-06-18 at the Wayback Machine". In: Steels, Luc (Ed.), Experiments in Cultural Language Evolution, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2012, p. 169-205.

[50] "Finnish Grammar – Adverbial cases". Users.jyu.fi. Retrieved 15 September 2014.

[51] "A Philosophical Grammar of Ithkuil, a Constructed Language – Chapter 4: Case Morphology". Ithkuil.net. Archived from the original on June 8, 2009. Retrieved 15 September 2014.

[52] "Chapter 4". Archived from the original on March 12, 2009. Retrieved 15 September 2014.

[53] "A Grammar of the Ithkuil Language – Chapter 4: Case Morphology". Ithkuil.net. Retrieved 15 September 2014.