Global terrestrial stilling

Global terrestrial stilling is the decrease of wind speed observed near the Earth's surface (~10-meter height) over the last three decades (mainly since the 1980s), originally termed "stilling".[1] This slowdown of near-surface terrestrial winds has mainly affected mid-latitude regions of both hemispheres, with a global average reduction of −0.140 m s−1 dec−1 (meters per second per decade) or between 5 and 15% over the past 50 years.[2] With high-latitude (> 75° from the equator) showing increases in both hemispheres. In contrast to the observed weakening of winds over continental surfaces, winds have tended to strengthen over ocean regions.[3][4] In the last few years, a break in this terrestrial decrease of wind speed has been detected suggesting a recovery at global scales since 2013.[5]

The exact cause(s) of the global terrestrial stilling are uncertain and has been mainly attributed to two major drivers: (i) changes in large scale atmospheric circulation, and (ii) an increase of surface roughness due to e.g. forest growth, land use changes, and urbanization.

Given climate change, changes in wind speed are currently a potential concern for society, due to their impacts on a wide array of spheres, such as wind power generation, ecohydrological implications for agriculture and hydrology, wind-related hazards and catastrophes, or air quality and human health, among many others.

Causes

The attribution of this weakening of terrestrial near-surface wind speed is not conclusive, probably because of several factors which interact simultaneously, and may change in space in time. Scientists have pointed out various major causes influencing this slowdown in wind speed: (i) The increase in land-surface roughness (e.g. forest growth, land use changes and urbanization) near meteorological station where anemometer instruments measure wind lead to a reinforcement of friction force that weaken low-level winds.[6][7][8] (ii) The variability of large-scale atmospheric circulation, associated with the poleward expansion of the Hadley cell[9] and the shifting of centers of action (i.e. anticyclones and cyclones) controlling changes in near-surface wind speed.[10][11][12] (iii) The changes in how wind speed is measured, including the deterioration or instrumental drift of anemometer devices; the technological improvement of anemometers; anemometer height changes;[13] shifts in measurements sites; changes in the environment around the monitoring station; calibration issues; and measuring time intervals.[14] (iv) The "global dimming", i.e., the decrease in the amounts of solar radiation reaching the Earth's surface due to increased aerosol and greenhouse gas concentrations, forces a stabilization of the atmosphere resulting in weak winds.[15] (v) Other causes, such as increasing trends in available soil moisture[16] and astronomical changes[17] have been put forward. However, the exact causes of the "global terrestrial stilling" are still unresolved because the uncertainties behind this phenomenon across the world.

Uncertainties

The "global terrestrial stilling" is not affecting in the same way the whole Earth's surface across both land and ocean surfaces. Spatially, increasing wind speed trends have been reported for some regions, in particular for high-latitudes,[18] coastal[19] and for ocean surfaces where different authors[3][20][4] have evidenced an increased global trend of wind speed using satellite measurements in the last 30–40 years. Recent studies have shown a break in the negative tendency of terrestrial wind speeds, with a recent widespread recovery / strengthening of wind speed since around 2013.[21][5] This creates uncertainty in understanding the phenomenon.

Most of the uncertainties behind the "global terrestrial stilling" debate resides in (i) the short wind speed data availability, with series starting in the 1960s, (ii) wind speed studies mainly carried on midlatitude regions where the majority of long-term measurements are available;[2] and (iii) the low quality of anemometer records as pointed out by the Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

The low quality in wind speed series is mainly due to non-climatic factors (e.g. observing practice changes, station relocation, anemometer height changes) affecting those records, which result to be unrepresentative of the actual wind speed variations over time. Specific homogenization protocols for wind speed series have been developed in order to detect and adjust potential inhomogeneities.[11]

Ongoing research

The current research on assessing and attributing this phenomenon has focused on reducing the limitation of short availability and low quality of wind speed data. The European funded research project STILLING[22] is a current (2016–2018) initiative that aims to reduce this constraint by rescuing, homogenizing and recovering the longest and highest-quality wind speed series across the globe. The project is currently compiling wind speed records starting in the 1880s providing scientists with approximately 130-year records, roughly 80 years more than previous studies available in the scientific literature. The better knowledge of the past wind speed climate is crucial for understanding the present "global terrestrial stilling" phenomenon, detecting if climate change is behind this slowdown of wind or similar trends-cycles occurred in the past and could be expected for the future. That is with longer records decadal cycles may be detected.

Implications of wind speed changes

The "global terrestrial stilling" phenomenon is of great scientific, socioeconomic, and environmental interest because of the key impact of even small wind speed changes on atmospheric and ocean dynamics and related fields such as: (i) renewable wind energy;[23] (ii) agriculture and hydrology due to evapotranspiration;[24] (iii) migration of wind-dispersed plant species;[25] (iv) wind-related natural disasters;[21] (v) marine and coastal impacts due to wind-driven storm surges and waves;[26] (vi) dispersion of air pollutants;[27] among many other socioeconomic and environmental spheres. However, for wind energy near-surface wind speeds are mainly observed within 10m of the land surface, and with turbines being located some 60-80m above the land surface more studies are needed here. More studies are also needed at higher elevation sites, which are often areas that yield much of our freshwater supplies, called water-towers,[28][29] as wind speeds there have been shown to be decreasing more rapidly than those changes recorded at lower elevation sites,[30] and there are several Chinese papers showing this for the Tibet Plateau.[31]

gollark: Yes, it's probably really hard for compilers to optimize it due to the weak type system.
gollark: Plus you have to manually muck with stupid layers of `cmake`, `autoconf`, `automake` and whatever else.
gollark: C, however, does not do this at all sanely for development environments.
gollark: Which Rust, etc allow.
gollark: Yes, indeed.

References
  1. Roderick ML, Rotstayn LD, Farquhar GD, Hobbins MT (2007) On the attribution of changing pan evaporation. Geophys Res Lett 34(17): L17403. doi:10.1029/2007GL031166
  2. McVicar TR, Roderick ML, Donohue RJ, Li LT, Van Niel TG, Thomas A, Grieser J, Jhajharia D, Himri Y, Mahowald NM, Mescherskaya AV, Kruger AC, Rehman S, Dinpashoh Y (2012) Global review and synthesis of trends in observed terrestrial near-surface wind speeds: Implications for evaporation. J Hydrol 416–417: 182–205. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.10.024
  3. Wentz FJ, Ricciardulli L, Hilburn K, Mears C (2007) How much more rain will global warming bring? Science 317(5835): 233–235. doi:10.1126/science.1140746
  4. Young IR, Zieger S, Babanin AV (2011) Global trends in wind speed and wave height. Science 332(6028): 451–455. doi:10.1126/science.1197219.
  5. Dunn RJH, Azorin-Molina C, Mears CA, Berrisford P, McVicar TR (2016) Surface winds. In State of the Climate 2015, Bull Amer Meteor Soc 97 (8): S38-S40.
  6. Vautard R, Cattiaux J, Yiou P, Thépaut JN, Ciais P (2010) Northern Hemisphere atmospheric stilling partly attributed to an increase in surface roughness. Nat Geosci 3(11): 756–761. doi:10.1038/ngeo979
  7. Bichet A, Wild M, Folini D, Schär C (2012) Causes for decadal variations of wind speed over land: Sensitivity studies with a global climate model. Geophys Res Lett 39(11): L11701. doi:10.1029/2012GL051685
  8. Wever N (2012) Quantifying trends in surface roughness and the effect on surface wind speed observations. J Geophys Res – Atmos 117(D11): D11104. doi:10.1029/2011JD017118.
  9. Lu, J., G. A. Vecchi, and T. Reichler, 2007: Expansion of the Hadley cell under global warming. Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L06805, doi:10.1029/2006GL028443.
  10. Lu J, Vecchi GA, Reichler T (2007) Expansion of the Hadley cell under global warning. Geophys Res Lett 34(6): L06805. doi:10.1029/2006GL028443.
  11. Azorin-Molina C, Vicente-Serrano SM, McVicar TR, Jerez S, Sanchez-Lorenzo A, López-Moreno JI, Revuelto J, Trigo RM, Lopez-Bustins JA, Espirito-Santo F (2014) Homogenization and assessment of observed near-surface wind speed trends over Spain and Portugal, 1961–2011. J Climate 27 (10): 3692–3712. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00652.1
  12. Azorin-Molina C, Guijarro JA, McVicar TR, Vicente-Serrano SM, Chen D, Jerez S, Espirito-Santo F (2016) Trends of daily peak wind gusts in Spain and Portugal, 1961–2014. J Geophys Res – Atmos 121(3): 1059–1078. doi:10.1002/2015JD024485
  13. Wan, H., L. W. Xiaolan, and V. R. Swail, 2010: Homogenization and trend analysis of Canadian near-surface wind speeds. J. Climate, 23, 1209–1225, doi:10.1175/2009JCLI3200.1.
  14. Azorin-Molina C, Vicente-Serrano SM, McVicar TR, Revuelto J, Jerez S, Lopez-Moreno JI (2017) Assessing the impact of measuring time interval when calculating wind speed means and trends under the stilling phenomenon. Int J Climatol 37(1): 480–492. doi:10.1002/joc.4720
  15. Xu M, Chang CP, Fu C, Qi Y, Robock A, Robinson D, Zhang H (2006) Steady decline of East Asian monsoon winds, 1969–2000: evidence from direct ground measurements of wind speed. J Geophys Res-Atmos 111: D24111. doi:10.1029/2006JD007337
  16. Shuttleworth WJ, Serrat-Capdevilla A, Roderick ML, Scott RL (2009) On the theory relating changes in area-average and pan evaporation. Q J R Meteorol Soc 135(642): 1230–1247. doi:10.1002/qj.434.
  17. Mazzarella A (2007) The 60-year solar modulation of global air temperature: the Earth́'s rotation and atmospheric circulation connection. Theor Appl Climatol 88(3–4): 193–199. doi:10.1007/s00704-005-0219-z.
  18. Minola L, Azorin-Molina C, Chen D (2016) Homogenization and assessment of observed near-surface wind speed trends across Sweden, 1956–2013. J Climate 29(20): 7397–7415. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0636.1
  19. Pinard JP (2007) Wind climate of the Whitehorse area. Artic 60(3): 227–237. doi:10.14430/arctic215
  20. Tokinaga H, Xie SP (2011) Wave- and Anemometer-based Sea-surface Wind (WASWind) for Climate Change Analysis. J Climate 24(1): 267–285. doi:10.1175/2010JCLI3789.1
  21. Kim J, Paik K (2015) Recent recovery of surface wind speed after decadal decrease: a focus on South Korea. Clim Dyn 45(5): 1699–1712. doi:10.1007/s00382-015-2546-9
  22. "STILLING: Towards improved understanding of the worldwide decline of wind speed in a climate change scenario". CORDIS.
  23. Otero C, Manchado C, Arias R, Bruschi VM, Gómez-Jáuregui V, Cendrero A (2012), Wind energy development in Cantabria, Spain. Methodological approach, environmental, technological and social issues, Renewable Energy, 40(1), 137–149, doi:10.1016/j.renene.2011.09.008
  24. McVicar TR, Roderick ML, Donohue RJ, Van Niel TG (2012), Less bluster ahead? Ecohydrological implications of global trends of terrestrial near-surface wind speeds, Ecohydrol., 5(4), 381–388, doi:10.1002/eco.1298
  25. Thompson, S.E., and G.G. Katul (2013), Implications of nonrandom seed abscission and global stilling for migration of wind-dispersed plant species, Glob. Chang. Biol., 19(6):1720–35, doi:10.1111/gcb.12173.
  26. Cid A., M. Menendez, S. Castanedo, A.J. Abascal, F.J. Méndez, and R. Medina (2016), Long-term changes in the frequency, intensity and duration of extreme storm surge events in southern Europe, Clim. Dyn., 46(5), 1503–1516, doi:10.1007/s00382-015-2659-1
  27. Cuevas, E., Y. Gonzalez, S. Rodriguez, J.C. Guerra, A.J. Gomez-Pelaez, S. Alonso-Perez, J. Bustos, and C. Milford (2013), Assessment of atmospheric processes driving ozone variations in the subtropical North Atlantic free troposphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13(4), 1973–1998, doi:10.5194/acp-13-1973-2013.
  28. Viviroli D, Archer DR, Buytaert W, Fowler HJ, Greenwood GB, Hamlet AF, Huang Y, Koboltschnig G, Litaor MI, Lopez-Moreno JI, Lorentz S, Schadler B, Schreier H, Schwaiger K, Vuille M, Woods R. 2011. Climate change and mountain water resources: overview and recommendations for research, management and policy. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 15(2): 471–504. doi:10.5194/hess-15-471-2011.
  29. Viviroli D, Durr HH, Messerli B, Meybeck M, Weingartner R. 2007. Mountains of the world, water towers for humanity: typology, mapping, and global significance. Water Resources Research 43(7):W07447. doi:10.1029/2006WR005653.
  30. McVicar TR, Van Niel TG, Roderick ML, Li LT, Mo XG, Zimmermann NE, Schmatz DR (2010). Observational evidence from two mountainous regions that near-surface wind speeds are declining more rapidly at higher elevations than lower elevations: 1960–2006. Geophys Res Lett 37 (6): L06402. doi:10.1029/2009GL042255
  31. You, Q., Fraedrich, K., Min, J., Kang, S., Zhu, X., Pepin, N., Zhang, L. (2014) Observed surface wind speed in the Tibetan Plateau since 1980 and its physical causes. International Journal of Climatology 34(6), 1873–1882. doi:10.1002/joc.3807
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.