Davis v. Massachusetts

Davis v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 167 U.S. 43 (1897), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States sustained a conviction of a man for making a speech on Boston Common in violation of an ordinance that forbade the making of a public address there without a permit from the mayor.

Davis v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Argued March 25, 1897
Decided May 10, 1897
Full case nameDavis v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Citations167 U.S. 43 (more)
17 S. Ct. 731; 42 L. Ed. 71
Court membership
Chief Justice
Melville Fuller
Associate Justices
Stephen J. Field · John M. Harlan
Horace Gray · David J. Brewer
Henry B. Brown · George Shiras Jr.
Edward D. White · Rufus W. Peckham
Case opinion
MajorityWhite, joined by unanimous

Facts of the case

Section 66 of the Revised Ordinances of the City of Boston (1893) reads as follows:

'Sec. 66. No person shall, in or upon any of the public grounds, make any public address, discharge any cannon or firearm, expose for sale any goods, wares or merchandise, erect or maintain any booth, stand, tent or apparatus for the purposes of public amusement or show, except in accordance with a permit from the mayor.'

It was alleged by the prosecution that Davis made a speech on Boston Common without a permit. Davis was brought before the Municipal Court of the City of Boston and convicted of violating section 66.

Prior history

The proceedings were removed to the Superior Court of the county of Suffolk, where Davis renewed a motion which he had interposed in the municipal court to quash the complaint. There were seven reasons argued to support the motion; among these was the assertion that the ordinance violated the rights alleged to be secured to the accused by the constitution of the state, and by the Fourteenth Amendment. The motion to quash being overruled by the Superior Court, Davis was tried before the court and a jury.[1]

At the trial the government put in evidence the ordinance heretofore referred to, and called the attention of the court to sections 35 and 39 of chapter 448 of the acts passed by the legislature of Massachusetts in the year 1854. Davis was convicted and subsequently appealed to the Supreme Court.

Decision

Davis' conviction was upheld by a unanimous decision of the Supreme Court.

gollark: I mean, intellectual property is somewhat weird, so why NOT entirely ignore it?!?!!?!!
gollark: That's what I do! I look up plot summaries on Wikipedia *while watching things*.
gollark: There is an esoteric programming languages Discord server, which is where the bees emoji was first imagined.
gollark: Ah, the esolangs bees emoji.
gollark: I am aware.

References
  1. "Davis v. Massachusetts, 167 U.S. 43 (1897)". Justia Law. Retrieved 2017-12-10. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.