Carroll v. Town of Princess Anne

Carroll v. Princess Anne
Carroll v. Princess Anne
	Supreme Court of the United States
Argued October 21, 1968; Decided November 19, 1968
Full case name	Joseph Carroll, et al. v. President and Commissioners of Princess Anne
Citations	393 U.S. 175 (more) 89 S. Ct. 347; 21 L. Ed. 2d 325
Holding
	Generally, a state cannot preemptively prohibit persons from holding a public meeting without first notifying them and giving them an opportunity to challenge the decision.
Court membership
	Chief Justice Earl Warren Associate Justices Hugo Black · William O. Douglas; John M. Harlan II · William J. Brennan Jr.; Potter Stewart · Byron White; Abe Fortas · Thurgood Marshall
Case opinions
Majority	Fortas, joined by Warren, Douglas, Brennan, Harlan, Stewart, White, Marshall
Concurrence	Black
Laws applied
	U.S. Const. amend. I, XIV

Carroll v. Princess Anne, 393 U.S. 175 (1968), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a state cannot preemptively prohibit persons from holding a public meeting, without first notifying the persons involved, and providing the persons an opportunity to argue the decision, unless moving party can show (per the equivalent of today's Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65) (1) that they made efforts to give to notice, and (2) explain to the court the reasons why such notice should not be required. The National States Rights Party won the case unanimously.

Background

A white supremacist group, the National States Rights Party, held a rally in Princess Anne, Maryland on August 6, 1966. They intended to hold another public meeting the following day, but local citizens persuaded a Circuit Court judge to issue a 10-day restraining order, prohibiting the group from holding any rally "which will tend to disturb and endanger the citizens of the County". The Party was not given any advance notice of the restraining order, nor given an opportunity to argue against it. The Circuit Court then issued a 10-month restraining order. The Maryland court of appeals overturned the 10 month order, but upheld the 10 day order. The Party appealed to the Supreme Court.

Opinion of the Court

The Supreme Court held that the 14th Amendment's guarantee of due process required the state to provide the group with notice and a hearing before a restraining order could be issued.[1] Justice Black concurred in the judgment.

The 10 day restraining order was set aside.

Notes and references

Graham, Fred P. (November 20, 1968). "High Court Limits Right to Ban Rallies; HIGH COURT CURBS BANS ON RALLIES". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved May 28, 2018.

gollark: I'm sure this is entirely true and there is no way to associate it with anything else.

gollark: But you have to manually contact them or something.

gollark: Ah, good, it seems like they do for at least some.

gollark: For all car-related data harvesting.

gollark: Do they actually have an opt out?

External links

Works related to Carroll v. Town of Princess Anne at Wikisource
Text of Carroll v. Princess Anne, 393 U.S. 175 (1968) is available from: Cornell Google Scholar Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.

[1] Graham, Fred P. (November 20, 1968). "High Court Limits Right to Ban Rallies; HIGH COURT CURBS BANS ON RALLIES". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved May 28, 2018.