Jamison v. Texas

Jamison v. State of Texas, 318 U.S. 413 (1943), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a Dallas city ordinance, which prohibited distribution of handbills on the streets, violated the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment because the material being distributed is religious in its nature.[1]

Jamison v. State of Texas
Argued February 12, 1943
Decided March 8, 1943
Full case nameJamison v. State of Texas
Citations318 U.S. 413 (more)
63 S. Ct. 669; 87 L. Ed. 869; 1943 U.S. LEXIS 889
Court membership
Chief Justice
Harlan F. Stone
Associate Justices
Owen Roberts · Hugo Black
Stanley F. Reed · Felix Frankfurter
William O. Douglas · Frank Murphy
Robert H. Jackson · Wiley B. Rutledge
Case opinions
MajorityBlack, joined by Stone, Roberts, Reed, Douglas, Murphy, Jackson, Rutledge
ConcurrenceFrankfurter

Facts of the case

Jamison, a member of the Jehovah's Witnesses, was charged with distributing handbills on the streets of Dallas, Texas, in violation of an ordinance of that city which prohibits their distribution. She was convicted in the Corporation Court of Dallas, and appealed to the County Criminal Court where, after a new trial, she was again convicted and a fine of $5.00 and costs was imposed.[1]

Decision of the Court

Justice Black delivered the opinion of the Court: "The state can prohibit the use of the street for the distribution of purely commercial leaflets, even though such leaflets may have 'a civic appeal, or a moral platitude' appended. They may not prohibit the distribution of handbills in the pursuit of a clearly religious activity merely because the handbills invite the purchase of books for the improved understanding of the religion or because the handbills seek in a lawful fashion to promote the raising of funds for religious purposes."[1]

gollark: The choice of compression method to use counts as extra data.
gollark: Yes, compression basically means you trade off some possible inputs becoming shorter for some possible inputs becoming larger.
gollark: Pigeonhole principle, again.
gollark: No.
gollark: The java native object serializey one may be bad and not good.

See also

References

  1. Jamison v. Texas, 318 U.S. 413 (1943).
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.