Dakota Access Pipeline protests

The Dakota Access Pipeline protests, also called by the hashtag #NoDAPL, were grassroots movements that began in early 2016 in reaction to the approved construction of Energy Transfer Partners' Dakota Access Pipeline in the northern United States. The pipeline was projected to run from the Bakken oil fields in western North Dakota to southern Illinois, crossing beneath the Missouri and Mississippi Rivers, as well as under part of Lake Oahe near the Standing Rock Indian Reservation. Based on ample scientific evidence[5], many in the Standing Rock tribe and surrounding communities considered the pipeline and its intended crossing beneath the Missouri River to constitute a serious threat to the region's drinking water, as well as to the water supply used to irrigate surrounding farmlands. The construction was also seen as a direct threat to ancient burial grounds and cultural sites of historic importance.

Dakota Access Pipeline Protests
No DAPL Part of Indigenous rights[1]
A Lakota man locks himself to construction equipment in protest
Date	April 2016 – February 2017
Location	United States, especially North Dakota, the Standing Rock Indian Reservation, the Missouri River, the Mississippi River, South Dakota, Iowa, Illinois
Caused by	Protection of water, land, and religious/spiritual sites sacred to indigenous peoples of the Americas
Casualties
Injuries	300[2]
Arrested	487+[3][4]

In April 2016, youth from Standing Rock and surrounding Native American communities organized as a direct action group and social media campaign to stop the pipeline, calling themselves, "ReZpect Our Water".[6] Inspired by the youth, several adults, including Joye Braun of the Indigenous Environmental Network[7] and tribal historian LaDonna Brave Bull Allard established a water protectors' camp as a center for direct action, spiritual resistance to the pipeline, cultural preservation, and defense of Indigenous sovereignty. Over the summer, the youth undertook a cross-country run from Standing Rock to Washington D.C. to raise awareness of the struggle. The #NoDAPL hashtag began to trend on social media and, gradually, the camps at Standing Rock grew to thousands of people. The actions drew considerable national and international attention and were said to be "reshaping the national conversation for any environmental project that would cross the Native American land."[7]

Attempts to remove the protesters gained a great deal of media attention. In September 2016, construction workers bulldozed a section of privately owned land the tribe had claimed as sacred ground, and when protesters trespassed into the area security workers used attack dogs which bit at least six of the protesters and one horse.[8] The incident was filmed and viewed by several million people on YouTube and other social media. In October 2016, police with riot gear and military equipment cleared an encampment that was directly in the proposed pipeline's path.[9] In November 2016, police use of water cannons on protesters in freezing weather drew significant media attention.[10]

During the protest numerous high-profile activists and Congressional Democrats spoke out for the rights of the tribe. Bernie Sanders actively supported the movement and President Obama spoke with tribal leaders and offered his support. Standing Rock Chairman David Archambault II, who was himself arrested and strip searched while protesting, gave numerous interviews explaining the tribe's positions; he also addressed the tribe's positions at the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, Switzerland. In December 2016, under President Barack Obama's administration the Corps of Engineers denied an easement for construction of the pipeline under the Missouri River. An environmental impact assessment was to be conducted by the Army Corps, but many protesters continued camping on the site, not trusting that the matter was closed.[11][12][13] On January 24, 2017, President Donald Trump signed an executive order that reversed the Obama legislation and advanced the construction of the pipeline under "terms and conditions to be negotiated," expediting the environmental review, which Trump described as an "incredibly cumbersome, long, horrible permitting process."[14][15] On February 7, 2017, President Trump authorized the Army Corps of Engineers to proceed, ending the environmental impact assessment and the associated public comment period.[16] Following his approval for the completion of the pipeline, the number of protesters gradually decreased and on February 23, 2017, the National Guard and law enforcement officers evicted those that remained.[17] The pipeline was completed by April and its first oil was delivered on May 14, 2017.[18]

The tribe sued and in March 2020 a federal judge sided with them and ordered USACE to do a full environmental impact statement. In a 42-page decision Judge James Boasberg said the environmental analysis by both the companies behind the pipeline and the Corps was severely lacking. “In projects of this scope, it is not difficult for an opponent to find fault with many conclusions made by an operator and relied on by the agency, but here, there is considerably more than a few isolated comments raising insubstantial concerns. The many commenters in this case pointed to serious gaps in crucial parts of the Corps’ analysis — to name a few, that the pipeline’s leak-detection system was unlikely to work, that it was not designed to catch slow spills, that the operator’s serious history of incidents had not been taken into account, and that the worst-case scenario used by the Corps was potentially only a fraction of what a realistic figure would be." The case will continue.[19]

Background

Cannonball river area, North Dakota

The Dakota Access Pipeline being built in central Iowa

The Dakota Access Pipeline, a part of the Bakken pipeline project, is a 1,172-mile-long (1,886 km) underground oil pipeline project in the United States. The pipeline was planned by Dakota Access, LLC, a subsidiary of the Dallas, Texas corporation Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. It begins in the Bakken oil fields in Northwest North Dakota and travels in a more or less straight line southeast, through South Dakota and Iowa, ending at the oil terminal near Patoka, Illinois.[20][21] According to court records, the pipeline was due for delivery on January 1, 2017.[22]

Routing the pipeline across the Missouri River near Bismarck was rejected because of the route's proximity to municipal water sources; residential areas; and road, wetland, and waterway crossings. The Bismarck route would also have been 11 miles (18 km) longer.[23] The alternative selected by the Corps of Engineers crossed underneath the Missouri River half a mile (800 m) from the Standing Rock Indian Reservation. A spill could have major adverse effects on the waters that the Tribe and individuals in the area rely upon.[24] Using a permit process that treated the pipeline as a series of small construction sites, the pipeline was granted an exemption from the environmental review required by the Clean Water Act and the National Environmental Policy Act.[25]

However, citing potential effects on the Native tribes, most notably the Standing Rock Sioux, in March and April 2016 the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Department of Interior (DOI), and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation asked the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to conduct a formal Environmental Impact Assessment and issue an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).

Noting that the water system serving Fort Yates on the Standing Rock Reservation was only 10 miles (16 km) downstream of where the pipeline would cross Lake Oahe and the Missouri River, the EPA recommended that the Army Corps revise its Environmental Assessment and open up a second public comment period. "Based on our improved understanding of the project setting, we also recommend addressing additional concerns regarding environmental justice and emergency response actions to spills/leaks."[26]

The DOI also expressed concerns about the pipeline's proximity to the tribe's water source:

The routing of a 12- to 30-inch crude oil pipeline in close proximity to and upstream of the Reservation is of serious concern to the Department. When establishing the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe's permanent homeland, the U.S. reserved waters of sufficient quantity and quality to serve the purposes of the Reservation. The Department holds more than 800,000 acres of land in trust for the Tribe that could be impacted by a leak or spill. Further, a spill could impact the waters that the Tribe and individual tribal members residing in that area rely upon for drinking and other purposes. We believe that, if the pipeline's current route along the edge of the Reservation remains an option, the potential impact on trust resources in this particular situation necessitates full analysis and disclosure of potential impacts through the preparation of an [Environmental Impact Statement].[26]

As of September 2016, the United States Department of Justice had received more than 33,000 petitions to review all permits and order a full review of the project's environmental effects.[27]

Sacred Stone Camp

Sacred Stone Camp

Campsite location

Sacred Stone Camp was founded by Standing Rock's Historic Preservation Officer, LaDonna Brave Bull Allard, on April 1, 2016, as a center for cultural preservation and spiritual resistance to the Dakota Access pipeline.[28][29] In the spring and early summer of 2016, Allard and other Indigenous leaders focused on media outreach, resulting in tribal delegations and individuals coming to stand with them from all over the country and, eventually, the world.[30] As the numbers grew beyond what Allard's land could support, an overflow camp was also established nearby, which came to be known as the Očhéthi Šakówiŋ camp (the Lakȟótiyapi name for the Great Sioux Nation or Seven Fires Council).[31] In September, Allard said:

Of the 380 archaeological sites that face desecration along the entire pipeline route, from North Dakota to Illinois, 26 of them are right here at the confluence of these two rivers. It is a historic trading ground, a place held sacred not only by the Sioux Nations, but also the Arikara, the Mandan, and the Northern Cheyenne...

The U.S. government is wiping out our most important cultural and spiritual areas. And as it erases our footprint from the world, it erases us as a people. These sites must be protected, or our world will end, it is that simple. Our young people have a right to know who they are. They have a right to language, to culture, to tradition. The way they learn these things is through connection to our lands and our history.

If we allow an oil company to dig through and destroy our histories, our ancestors, our hearts and souls as a people, is that not genocide?[28]

By late September NBC News reported that members of more than 300 federally recognized Native American tribes were residing in the three main camps, alongside an estimated 3,000 to 4,000 pipeline resistance supporters. Several thousand more gathered at the camps on weekends.[7][32][33] As winter approached numbers grew lower, but the protesters winterized and prepared for an indefinite stay. In October another camp, called "Winter Camp", was established[34] directly in the proposed pipeline's path on the property recently purchased by Energy Transfer Partners. Citing eminent domain,[35] the Native American protesters declared that the land rightly belongs to them under the Treaty of Fort Laramie (1851). Though the initial territory agreed to in the treaty was later broken up into smaller reservations, the treaty was never nullified and was being invoked as law.[36] On October 27, police in riot gear with military equipment and armed soldiers removed the protesters from the new encampment.[37][38]

Indigenous youth groups

ReZpect Our Water

ReZpect Our Water - logo of the water runners, youth who ran from Standing Rock to Washington DC to protest the Dakota Access Pipeline in the summer of 2016

ReZpect Our Water is an indigenous youth group that formed to oppose the pipeline.[39] They have been very active in raising public awareness through social media, petitions, teach-ins, rallies, and videos. In May 2016, 13-year-old Anna Lee Rain Yellowhammer and thirty young people launched a petition that opposed the pipeline. It quickly gathered over 80,000 signatures, including celebrity endorsements such as Leonardo DiCaprio and Cameron Russell.[40][41]

In April 2016, ReZpect Our Water organized a 2,000 mile cross-country "spiritual run" from North Dakota to Washington, D.C., to protest the construction of the pipeline. Upon the groups arrival they delivered a petition with 160,000 signatures to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.[42][43]

Speaking about the legacy of indigenous women's activism in a June 2016 interview with Truthout, Tokata Iron Eyes, a 12-year-old Lakota girl who has been one of the leading youth organizers in the campaign, said:

Women were the people who held the tribe together and they were the willpower of the tribe and its strength. So, just knowing that we come from such powerful genes makes us feel strong inside.[44]

Activist Naomi Klein also interviewed Iron Eyes; she posted a Facebook video of the interview which gained more than a million views in 24 hours.[45]

The International Indigenous Youth Council

The International Indigenous Youth Council has also been active in protests against the pipeline and advocacy for Native American needs. The group was founded by Jaslyn Charger (Cheyenne River Sioux of Eagle Butte, South Dakota). Tara Houska (Ojibwe, Couchiching First Nation of International Falls, Minnesota), national campaigns director of Honor the Earth, has actively helped to explain the protest aims. Eryn Wise (Jicarilla Apache and Laguna tribes), Council communications director, hopes to relate history from the Indigenous people's point of view: "We don't ever hear the narrative of indigenous people. We hear people writing our narratives for us."[46]

Protests

In September 2014, Standing Rock Sioux Tribal (SRST) Councilman David Archambault II conducted an initial informational meeting between the SRST and Dakota Access Pipeline representatives. At the beginning of the meeting, Archambault indicated the tribe's opposition to the project within treaty boundaries, stating, "So just that you know: this is something that the tribe is not supporting." Additional SRST representatives voiced opposition and concerns about the pipeline.[47][48]

Pipeline protests were reported as early as October 2014, when Iowa community and environmental activists presented 2,300 petitions to Iowa Governor Terry Branstad asking him to sign a state executive order to stop it.[49] Voicing concerns for damage to wildlife habitat and sacred sites, the Sac & Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa (Meskwaki Nation) also objected to the route and formally lodged their opposition in early 2015.[50] Tribal members were also among those who opposed the Keystone XL pipeline.[51] In a letter to the Iowa Utilities Board, Tribal chairwoman Judith Bender wrote:

As a people that have lived in North America for thousands of years, we have environmental concerns about the land and drinking water... Our main concern is Iowa's aquifers might be significantly damaged. And it will only take one mistake and life in Iowa will change for the next thousands of years. We think that should be protected, because it is the water that gives Iowa the best way of life.[50]

The tribe sued for an injunction on the grounds that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers had failed to conduct a proper environmental and cultural impact study. Protests had escalated at the pipeline site in North Dakota, with numbers swelling from just a bare handful of people to hundreds and then thousands over the summer.[52]

The Standing Rock Sioux tribe believes that the pipeline would put the Missouri River, the water source for the reservation, at risk. They pointed out two recent spills, a 2010 pipeline spill into the Kalamazoo River in Michigan, which cost over billion to clean up with significant contamination remaining, and a 2015 Bakken crude oil spill into the Yellowstone River in Montana.[42][53][54] The Tribe was also concerned that the pipeline route may run through sacred Sioux sites. In August 2016 protests were held, halting a portion of the pipeline near Cannon Ball, North Dakota.[55][56] Peaceful protests continued and drew indigenous people from throughout North America, as well as other supporters. A number of planned arrests occurred when people locked themselves to heavy machinery.[57]

On August 23, Standing Rock Sioux Tribe released a list of 87 tribal governments who wrote resolutions, proclamations and letters of support stating their solidarity with Standing Rock and the Sioux people.[58] Since then, many more Native American organizations, politicians, environmental groups and civil rights groups joined the effort in North Dakota, including the Black Lives Matter movement, indigenous leaders from the Amazon Basin of South America, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, the 2016 Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein and her running mate Ajamu Baraka, and many more.[59] The Washington Post called it a "National movement for Native Americans."[7][60] As of September, the protest constituted the single largest gathering of Native Americans in more than 100 years.[61][32]

Security firm use of dogs and pepper spray against protesters

On September 3, 2016, during Labor Day weekend, the Dakota Access Pipeline brought in a private security firm when the company used bulldozers to dig up part of the pipeline route that contained possible Native graves and burial artifacts; it was subject to a pending injunction motion. The bulldozers arrived within a day after the tribe filed legal action.[62] Energy Transfer bulldozers cut a two-mile (3200 m) long, 150-foot (45 m) wide path through the contested area.[63][64]

When unarmed protesters crossed the perimeter fence to stop the bulldozers, the guards used pepper spray and guard dogs to attack. At least six protesters were treated for dog bites, and an estimated 30 were pepper-sprayed before the guards and their dogs left the scene in trucks. A woman that had taken part in the incident stated, "The cops watched the whole thing from up on the hills. It felt like they were trying to provoke us into being violent when we're peaceful."[64] The incident was filmed by Amy Goodman and a crew from Democracy Now![63][65] Footage shows several people with dog bites and a dog with blood on its muzzle.[64][66][67]

Frost Kennels of Hartville, Ohio, acknowledged that they were involved in the incident on September 3.[68] Executive director for Private Investigator Security Guard Services Geoff Dutton said Frost Kennels and its owner, Bob Frost, were not licensed by the state of Ohio to provide security services or guard dogs. Morton County Sheriff Kyle Kirchmeier said they were investigating both sides in the incident, including wounds inflicted by the dogs, and that they had no prior knowledge of the use of dogs until a 9-1-1 call was made. When asked why the deputies who witnessed the incident did not intervene, Kirchmeier cited officer security concerns,[68] and said:

Any suggestion that today's event was a peaceful protest is false. This was more like a riot than a protest. Individuals crossed onto private property and accosted private security officers with wooden posts and flag poles. The aggression and violence displayed here today is unlawful and should not be repeated. While no arrests were made at the scene, we are actively investigating the incident and individuals who organized and participated in this unlawful event.[69]

After viewing footage of the attack, a law enforcement consultant who trains police dogs called it "absolutely appalling" and "reprehensible". "Taking bite dogs and putting them at the end of a leash to intimidate, threaten and prevent crime is not appropriate."[68] A former K-9 officer for the Grand Forks Police Department who now owns a security firm that uses dogs for drug detection said, "It reminded me of the civil rights movement back in the '60s. I didn't think it was appropriate. They were overwhelmed and it just wasn't proper use of the dogs."[68]

The American Civil Liberties Union of North Dakota spoke out against the use of dogs and pepper spray and asked that the state officials "treat everyone fairly and equally."[68] Speaking on September 4, Ojibwe activist and former Green Party vice presidential candidate Winona LaDuke said, "North Dakota regulators are really, I would say, in bed with the oil industry and so they have looked the other way."[63]

High-profile arrests

On August 11–12, 18 people were arrested, including Standing Rock Tribal Chairman David Archambault II who was charged with disorderly conduct. Along with the tribal council, Archambault had sued the Army Corps of Engineers days before his arrest.[70] He was himself sued on August 16 by Dakota Access, LLC, which sought "restraining orders and unspecified monetary damages."[71]

On August 30, 2 women, Ruby Montoya and Jessica Reznicek were arrested for conspiracy to damage an energy facility, four counts each of malicious use of fire and the use of fire to commit a felony.[72] The two set fire to machinery and tools and then used a torch to pierce the metal piping and valves. The charges they were indicted for carry up to 110 years in prison, one of the largest sentences on environmental activists in the past decade.[72][73]

On September 7 an arrest warrant was also issued in Morton County for Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein and her running mate Ajamu Baraka on misdemeanor counts of criminal trespass and criminal mischief. Stein had spray-painted "I approve this message" and Baraka wrote the word "decolonize" on a bulldozer.[74]

A warrant for journalist Amy Goodman's arrest was issued by Morton County on September 8. She was charged with criminal trespass related to the filming done on September 3.[66][67] The prosecutor, Ladd Erickson, said Goodman was like a protester because she was only giving time to the protesters' side of the story.[75] In response to praise from Erickson, Matt Taibbi wrote, "a prosecutor who arrests a reporter because he doesn't think she's 'balanced' enough is basically telling future reporters what needs to be in their stories to avoid arrest. This is totally improper and un-American."[76]

On October 1, Canadian journalist Ed Ou, on assignment with the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation to cover the protests, was detained at the US border for six hours, with his cell phones and other electronic media confiscated. Ou was eventually denied entry to the US without explanation.[77] The American Civil Liberties Union requested that any data collected from Ou's electronic devices be destroyed and that he be given assurance that he would not be harassed again.[78]

Speaking on October 5, Standing Rock Tribal Chairman David Archambault II said that as of that date 135 anti-pipeline demonstrators had been arrested. Archambault also said that law enforcement officers were "heightening the danger" by using anti-riot gear.[22] Saying, "Confronting men, women, and children while outfitted in gear more suited for the battlefield is a disproportionate response", Amnesty International also expressed concern about the militant response to the protesters.[79]

On October 13, Goodman announced her intention to turn herself in to the Morton County–Mandan Corrections Center on Monday, October 17, to face misdemeanor riot charges. (Though she had originally been charged with criminal trespass, the prosecutor said that there were "legal issues with proving the notice of trespassing requirements in the statute.")[80] She stated that she would be fighting the charges against her as a First Amendment violation.[81] The Committee to Protect Journalists,[82] the North Dakota Newspaper Association,[83] the American Civil Liberties Union in North Dakota,[84] and the Freedom of the Press Foundation[84] all expressed concern over the developing challenge to freedom of the press.

On October 17, District Judge John Grinsteiner did not find probable cause for multiple riot charges, including the one brought against Goodman. Following the judge's decision, Kirchmeier reasserted that trespassing would lead to arrest, while the state prosecutor said that the investigation would remain open pending new evidence.[85]

Harsh treatment

As of mid-October, there had been over 140 arrests. Some protesters who were arrested for misdemeanors and taken to the Morton County jail reported what they considered harsh and unusual treatment. Sara Jumping Eagle, a physician on the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation, said that she was required to remove all of her clothing and "squat and cough" when she was arrested for disorderly conduct. In another such case, LaDonna Brave Bull Allard, who founded Sacred Stone Camp, said that when her daughter was arrested and taken into custody she was "strip-searched in front of multiple male officers, then left for hours in her cell, naked and freezing." Cody Hall from Cheyenne River Reservation in South Dakota also reported being strip-searched. He was held for four days without bail or bond and then charged with two misdemeanors.[86]

Actress Shailene Woodley, arrested on October 10 along with 27 others, also said she was strip-searched, adding, "Never did it cross my mind that while trying to protect clean water, trying to ensure a future where our children have access to an element essential for human survival, would I be strip-searched. I was just shocked."[87] Amnesty International spoke out against the use of strip searches and said that they had sent a letter to the Morton County Sheriff's Department expressing concern about the degree of force used against people taking part in the protests. They sent a delegation of human rights observers to monitor law enforcement's response to the protests.[79]

Protesters said they were blasted with high-pitched sound cannons and described being held in "what appeared to be" dog kennels, with identifying numbers written on their arms.[88] Linda Black Elk tweeted, "Our sisters who got arrested were stripped, marked with numbers, and held in dog kennels. Sound familiar?"[89]

Police move to clear camp

On October 27, police from several agencies, including North Dakota state troopers, the National Guard, and other law enforcement agencies from surrounding states, began an intensive operation to clear out a protest camp and blockades along Highway 1806.[90] The Morton County Sheriff's Department said in a statement: "Protesters' escalated unlawful behavior this weekend by setting up illegal roadblocks, trespassing onto private property and establishing an encampment, has forced law enforcement to respond at this time. I can't stress it enough, this is a public safety issue. We cannot have protesters blocking county roads, blocking state highways, or trespassing on private property."[37]

A Seattle Times journalist present at the confrontation described it as "scary". On the PBS Newshour, she said that she had spent the previous night in the camp "with tribal members who were singing their death songs. I mean, they were very worried about the possibility of violence. And who wouldn't be? You have seen law enforcement marshaled from six states, armored personnel carriers, hundreds and hundreds of law enforcement officers with concussion grenades, mace, Tasers, batons. And they used all of it. I mean, it was frightening to watch." She said that the confrontation ended the following day and said, "the law enforcement officers had advance[d] more than 100 yards with five armored personnel carriers side by side, hundreds of law enforcement officers advancing on them. And it finally took an elder to actually walk by himself in between the two lines, stand there, face his people, and say: 'Go home. We're here to fight the pipeline, not these people, and we can only win this with prayer.'"[91][92][93][94]

Responding to the confrontation, on October 28 Amnesty International published a press release saying in part: "These people should not be treated like the enemy. Police must keep the peace using minimal force appropriate to the situation. Confronting men, women, and children while outfitted in gear more suited for the battlefield is a disproportionate response. Under International law and standards, arrests should not be used to intimidate or prevent people from participating in peaceful assembly."[79]

Black Lives Matter co-founder Alicia Garza contrasted the aggressive police action with the treatment of the organizers of a standoff at an Oregon wildlife refuge (acquitted of federal charges on the same day as the police raid of the camp),[95] saying "If you're white, you can occupy federal property ... and get found not guilty. No teargas, no tanks, no rubber bullets ... If you're indigenous and fighting to protect our earth, and the water we depend on to survive, you get tear gassed, media blackouts, tanks and all that."[96]

Protesters move to clear blocked bridge and police respond

On the evening of November 20, protesters attempted to open Backwater Bridge on Highway 1806, which had been blocked since October 27. The bridge is about a mile (1600 m) south of where the pipeline developer plans to drill. According to the sheriff's department, the bridge was closed for safety reasons "due to damage caused after protesters set numerous fires" on it on October 27. But the protesters believe that the police used the closure to "lock [them] in" and that the closure blocked access for emergency vehicles coming from the north.[97]

According to news reports, the police launched an attack on the protesters with water cannons in 28 °F (−2 °C) weather, along with teargas, rubber bullets, and concussion grenades, injuring hundreds.[98] The police said the protesters had been "very aggressive" and that the water was used to put out multiple fires they had set, while the protesters said the fires were peaceful bonfires used to keep warm.[97] A number of videos posted on social media show protesters being doused with continuous streams of water. Initially the Morton County Sheriff's Office said the water was used only to put out fires, but the following day Sheriff Kirchmeier corrected that statement, saying, "Some of the water was used to repel some of the protest activities" and adding that it was "sprayed more as a mist and we didn't want to get it directly on them but we wanted to make sure to use it as a measure to keep everybody safe."[99]

A woman's arm was seriously injured by an explosion that protesters claimed was part of a concussion grenade but which police suggest may have been an exploding propane canister. The victim's father stated in a press conference that his daughter had seen a police officer throw the explosive device directly at her as she was backing away.[100] The Morton County Sheriff's Department denied using concussion grenades, and reported that protesters were throwing expended propane canisters at police during this period.[101][102][103][104][105][106][107] Law enforcement, including the ATF and North Dakota Bureau of Criminal Investigation, are investigating the incident.[108]

By December the protest camp had dwindled to a few hundred people due to the construction work stoppage and harsh winter weather. Standing Rock Chairman Dave Archambault called for the camp to disband because of the weather and the possibility of contamination of the river with garbage and debris during the spring flood. He asked people to clean up the area and to leave.[109] In January 2017, it was reported that the cost of policing the pipeline protests in North Dakota had surpassed $22 million.[110] In February 2017, amid concerns that warmer weather would accelerate flooding of the area, removal of garbage and debris from the campsite began to prevent the contamination of the river. Archambault indicated that funds from the $6 million in donations the tribe received to support its fight would be used to clean up the garbage, building material and human waste at the camp. The tribe began coordinating cleanup of the site in January 2017.[111]

Police clear remaining protesters from camp

On February 22, 2017, the protest site was cleared. Although many left voluntarily, ten people were arrested.[112] On February 23, National Guard and law enforcement officers evicted the remaining protesters. Thirty-three people were arrested.[17] After the protest site was abandoned, sanitation crews cleared garbage from the protest;[113] this included abandoned cars and human waste.[114] Also abandoned were 12 dogs.[115][116] North Dakota Department of Emergency Services estimated that about 48 million pounds of garbage was removed;[117] the cost of cleaning up the protest site was about $1 million.[115][118]

Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Lake Oahe in winter

On July 27, 2016, the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe sued the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief to stop the pipeline. The tribe also sought a preliminary injunction.[119][120][121]

On September 9, U.S. District Judge James Boasberg denied the motion. Later the same day, a joint statement was issued by the US Departments of Justice, Army, and Interior temporarily halting the project on federal land bordering or under the Lake Oahe reservoir. The US federal government asked the company for a "voluntary pause" on construction near that area until further study was done on the region extending 20 miles (32 km) around Lake Oahe. In closing the agency representatives said:

Finally, we fully support the rights of all Americans to assemble and speak freely. In recent days, we have seen thousands of demonstrators come together peacefully, with support from scores of sovereign tribal governments, to exercise their First Amendment rights and to voice heartfelt concerns about the environment and historic, sacred sites. It is now incumbent on all of us to develop a path forward that serves the broadest public interest.[121][122]

Energy Transfer Partners rejected the request to voluntarily halt construction on all surrounding private land and resumed construction within 48 hours.[123]

On September 13, chairman and CEO of Energy Transfer Partners Kelcy Warren responded to the federal government's request, saying concerns about the pipeline's impact on the water supply were "unfounded." Warren said that "multiple archaeological studies conducted with state historic preservation offices found no sacred items along the route". They did not indicate that they would voluntarily cease work on the pipeline. Warren wrote that the company will meet with officials in Washington "to understand their position and reiterate our commitment to bring the Dakota Access Pipeline into operation."[124]

On October 5, federal appeals judges heard arguments over whether to stop work on the pipeline; a ruling was not expected for several weeks. At that time the Army Corps of Engineers had not yet made a final decision on whether to grant an easement to build under the Missouri River. Under questioning, a pipeline attorney said that "if the court allowed it, the company would continue building up to the lake's edge even before the easement decision, because each extra month of delay will cost the company more than $80 million".[22]

Army Corps of Engineers delays decision

On November 14, the Army Corps of Engineers said it needed more time to study the impact of the plan. In a news release, they said: "The Army has determined that additional discussion and analysis are warranted in light of the history of the Great Sioux Nation's dispossessions of lands, the importance of Lake Oahe to the Tribe, our government-to-government relationship, and the statute governing easements through government property."[125]

Energy Transfer Partners responded by criticizing the Obama administration for "political interference" and said that "further delay in the consideration of this case would add millions of dollars more each month in costs which cannot be recovered." North Dakota Governor Jack Dalrymple criticized the decision saying the pipeline would be safe and that the decision was "long overdue".[126] Craig Stevens, spokesman for the MAIN Coalition, a labor group, called the Corps's announcement "yet another attempt at death by delay" and said the Obama administration "has chosen to further fan the flames of protest by more inaction." North Dakota Senator John Hoeven said in a statement that the delay "will only prolong the disruption in the region caused by protests and make life difficult for everyone who lives and works in the area."[127]

Speaking on the PBS Newshour on November 16, Energy Transfer Partners CEO Kelcy Warren responded to questions about the Tribe's two main concerns, damage to ancestral sites and the potential of water contamination if a leak occurred:

Well, first of all, I think this is well known by now. We're not on any Indian property at all, no Native American property. We're on private lands. That's number one. Number two, this pipeline is new steel pipe. We're boring underneath Lake Oahe. It's going to go 90 feet to 150 feet (27.5-45.7 m) below the lake's surface. It's thick wall pipe, extra thick, by the way, more so than just the normal pipe that we lay. Also, on each side of the lake, there's automated valves that, if in the very, very unlikely situation there were to be a leak, our control room shuts down the pipe, encapsulates that small section that could be in peril. So, that's just not going to happen. Number one, we're not going to have a leak. I can't promise that, of course, but that — no one would get on airplanes if they thought they were going to crash. And, number two, there is no way there would be any crude contaminate their water supply. They're 70 miles (110 km) downstream.[128]

On December 4, the Army announced that it would not grant an easement for the pipeline to be drilled under Lake Oahe.[129] The announcement was made by the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works), Jo-Ellen Darcy:

Although we have had continuing discussion and exchanges of new information with the Standing Rock Sioux and Dakota Access, it's clear that there's more work to do. The best way to complete that work responsibly and expeditiously is to explore alternate routes for the pipeline crossing.[130]

Energy Transfer Partners and Sunoco Logistics Partners issued a same-day response:

The White House's directive today to the Corps for further delay is just the latest in a series of overt and transparent political actions by an administration which has abandoned the rule of law in favor of currying favor with a narrow and extreme political constituency. As stated all along, ETP and SXL fully expect to complete construction of the pipeline without any additional rerouting in and around Lake Oahe. Nothing this Administration has done today changes that in any way.[131]

Dakota Access, LLC permitted to continue construction

On January 24, 2017, newly elected President Donald Trump signed an executive order allowing the pipeline's construction to proceed.[132] On February 8, 2017, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) granted Dakota Access, LLC an easement based on the Mineral Leasing Act to cross Lake Oahe and finish construction of the pipeline. On February 9, 2017, the Court dismissed the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe's motion for a restraining order citing Religious Freedom Restoration Act violations, claiming an oil spill would disrupt their ability to worship freely.[133]  On February 14, 2017, the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe filed a motion for summary judgment. The motion asked the Court to rule on unresolved legal questions concerning USACE, including the meeting of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requirements and the violation of Tribal treaty rights. The motion addressed three claims: 1) the lawful requirement of a full, transparent and public environmental review for any federal action that has "significant" environmental effects, 2) Tribal treaty rights that guarantee the integrity of their reservation, and 3) the reversal of decisions from the previous administration.[133][134]   

Federal Court finds the environmental study inadequate

On June 14, 2017, Federal Judge James Boasberg ruled that the permits authorizing the pipeline to cross the Missouri River ultimately violated NEPA. In a ninety-one page decision, Judge Boasberg wrote, "the Court agrees that [the Corps] did not adequately consider the impacts of an oil spill on fishing rights, hunting rights, or environmental justice, or the degree to which the pipeline's effects are likely to be highly controversial".[135]  USACE failed to comply with NEPA because their Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) did not address the following: (1) likelihood that the project would be controversial, (2) the consequence of an oil spill on fishing and hunting rights, and (3) the environmental justice impact of the project.[133] The court halted construction on the pipeline until USACE could adequately address these concerns. The Court's finding did not include a decision on continuing pipeline operation, but did request an additional briefing on the subject. Judge Boasberg asked the parties to submit legal briefs on the question of whether the Court should shut down the pipeline pending the completion of a lawful environmental review.[133] [134]  

On August 7, 2017, the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe filed a legal brief arguing in favor of pipeline shutdown during the environmental review process.[133][134] The Tribes received support from law professors and practitioners, tribes and tribal organizations, and other amicus parties.  The Court granted the Tribes' motion for summary judgment for three reasons. First, the Court held that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers failed to address expert critiques of Dakota Access, LLC's oil spill risk analysis. Second, the Court found fault in USACE's disregard of impacts an oil spill would have on the Tribes' Treaty rights to fish and hunt.[136] Finally, the Court found that USACE conducted a skewed assessment that reached the conclusion that the selected site raised no environmental justice concerns. Under the Court's order, USACE will reassess these questions and come to a new decision on if a full environmental impact statement is required.[136]  

On October 11, 2017, the Court ruled that DAPL could continue to operate while USACE reassessed the environmental impact of the pipeline. While the Court did not find that shutting down the pipeline would cause a major economic disruption as claimed by DAPL, they refused to shut the pipeline down during the impact study due to the possibility that USACE would be able to justify its decision to not do a full environmental review. USACE predicts that the review will be finished by April 2018. Following the Court's finding a statement was issued by Earthjustice Attorney Jan Hasselman, who is representing the Tribe.

Today's decision is a disappointing continuation of a historic pattern: other people get all the profits, and the Tribes get all the risk and harm. The court already found that the Corps violated the law when it issued the permits without thoroughly considering the impact on the people of Standing Rock. The company should not be allowed to continue operating while the Corps studies that threat.,[134]

Safety measures imposed

Following a 200,000 gallon Keystone pipeline oil spill in November 2017, Judge Boasberg imposed several interim measures over the ongoing operation of the Dakota Access pipeline. The Court ordered three measures, which had been requested by the Tribe. According to a report published by Earthjustice, a non-profit public interest law organization dedicated to environmental issues:

The Court ordered the Corps and DAPL to work with the Tribes to complete oil spill response plans at Lake Oahe. Up to now, the Tribe has been kept in the dark about spill response planning and was not involved in the process of developing plans to address spills at Lake Oahe. Second, the Court ordered an independent audit of DAPL's compliance with the permit conditions and standards. The Tribe has to be involved in the selection of an auditor. Finally, DAPL must file regular reports on any incidents or repairs on the pipeline. Such reporting is not currently required by law, which means the public does not learn about the nearly constant spills and leaks of oil that occur on major pipelines.[134]

The conditions were all opposed by the Corps and by DAPL.

Prosecutions of protesters

Federal

Federal prosecutors brought indictments against at least five indigenous activists from the protests.[137] Dion Ortiz, James "Angry Bird" White, Michael "Little Feather" Giron, and Michael "Rattler" Markus were all convicted of one count of civil disorder. RedFawn Fallis was convicted of civil disorder and illegal possession of a gun by a convicted felon. White was sentenced to serve twenty-four months of probation. The other five protesters were incarcerated in federal prison, Ortiz for 16 months, Giron and Markus for 36 months, and Fallis for 57 months.[138][139]

State

There were hundreds of arrests of indigenous protesters and their allies. This included journalists, such as Amy Goodman, political figures such as Jill Stein and Ajamu Baraka, actress Shailene Woodley, and numerous members of the left-leaning media collective Unicorn Riot.[140][141][142][143] According to the Water Protector Legal Collective over 800 state criminal cases were brought by North Dakota prosecutors.[144] Of these nearly 400 resulted in dismissals of charges, 42 ended in not-guilty verdicts at trial, nearly 200 were subjected to pre-trial diversion, and just 26 cases ended in convictions after trials. There are still 42 open cases before the state court.[144]

TigerSwan security firm

In December 2016, it was reported by Charlie May that Dakota Access LLC had hired the firm TigerSwan to provide security during the protest.[145] In May 2017, internal TigerSwan documents leaked to The Intercept and other documents obtained through public records requests revealed a close collaboration between the pipeline company and local, state, and federal law enforcement as they carried out "military-style counterterrorism measures" to suppress the protesters. TigerSwan also collected information used to assist prosecutors in building cases against protesters, and used social media in an attempt to sway public support for the pipeline. One of the released documents called the pipeline opposition movement "an ideologically driven insurgency with a strong religious component" that operated along a "jihadist insurgency model".[146] The Intercept reported that "Energy Transfer Partners has continued to retain TigerSwan long after most of the anti-pipeline campers left North Dakota, and the most recent TigerSwan reports emphasize the threat of growing activism around other pipeline projects across the country."[146]

Presidential memorandum by Donald Trump

Banner against the pipeline in a 2017 inauguration day protest in Minnesota

In December 2016, while still directed by the Obama administration, the Army Corps of Engineers decided that further study to address tribal concerns was needed and launched a study on January 18, 2017. But on January 24, newly elected President Donald Trump signed a presidential memorandum to advance the construction of the pipeline under "terms and conditions to be negotiated". The order would expedite the environmental review that Trump described as an "incredibly cumbersome, long, horrible permitting process."[14][15]

Trump signing the Presidential memorandum to advance the construction of the Keystone XL and Dakota Access pipelines. January 24, 2017

On February 7, 2017, Trump authorized the Army Corps of Engineers to proceed, ending its environmental impact assessment and the associated public comment period.[16] The director of the Indigenous Environmental Network released a statement saying: "The granting of an easement, without any environmental review or tribal consultation, is not the end of this fight—it is the new beginning. Expect mass resistance far beyond what Trump has seen so far. ... Our tribal nations and Indigenous grassroots peoples on the front lines have had no input on this process."[147] Standing Rock chairman David Archambault II said, "We are not opposed to energy independence. We are opposed to reckless and politically motivated development projects, like DAPL, that ignore our treaty rights and risk our water. Creating a second Flint does not make America great again."[148] Appearing as a guest on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert on February 12, actress and activist Shailene Woodley said that, rather than gather at the Dakota protest site, the best way to oppose the pipeline may be to boycott banks that fund it and to take part in local protests.[149]

Support

Seattle Stands with Standing Rock! - peaceful march and rally held in Seattle in September 2016. Indigenous drummers, activists from a number of Nations, and diverse supporters march in solidarity.

Dakota Access Pipeline protestors at March for a Clean Energy Revolution, Philadelphia, July 2016

Solidarity rally in Saint Paul, Minnesota, September 2016.

Standing Rock solidarity march in San Francisco, November 2016.

Native Nations Rise march in Washington D.C., March 2017.

Many Sioux Tribes passed resolutions in support of Standing Rock, including the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, Crow Creek Tribe, the Oglala Sioux Tribe, and the Rosebud Sioux Tribe.[29] Oklahoma tribes also expressed support for the pipeline protest movement. In August, Principal Chief Bill John Baker of the Cherokee Nation said, "As Indian people, we have a right to protect our lands and protect our water rights. That's our responsibility to the next seven generations."[150]

Senator Bernie Sanders said he "join[s] with the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and the many tribal nations fighting this dangerous pipeline. Like the Keystone XL pipeline, which I opposed since day one, the Dakota Access fracked oil pipeline, will transport some of the dirtiest fuel on the planet. Regardless of the court's decision, the Dakota Access pipeline must be stopped. As a nation, our job is to break our addiction to fossil fuels, not increase our dependence on oil."[151]

Field reporter Jordan Chariton (of The Young Turks' on-the-road program TYT Politics) was one of the most active journalists participating in the protests. He commented on the scant presence of journalists from mainstream networks such as CNN and MSNBC.[152]

Online Presence

Along with the hashtag #NoDAPL, many other hashtags sprang up on Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram to protest the pipeline. The hashtags included #ReZpectOurWater, which is a play on "reservations", #StandWithStandingRock, and #WaterisLife.[153][154] Activist Naomi Klein posted a Facebook video in which she interviewed a youth, Iron Eyes, which gained more than a million views in 24 hours.[155]

In December 2016, Klein, writing an editorial in The Nation shortly after the Army Corps of Engineers had turned down the permit for the Dakota Access Pipeline to be built under the Missouri River, said, "The Lesson from Standing Rock: Organizing and Resistance Can Win." As a long standing climate change activist, Klein said that past resistance has brought about change incrementally and only after a delay following mass actions. However, she wrote, Standing Rock had been "different."

Standing Rock is different. This time the movement was still out on the land in massive numbers when the news came down. The line between resistance and results is bright and undeniable. That kind of victory is rare precisely because it's contagious, because it shows people everywhere that organizing and resistance are not futile. And as Donald Trump moves closer and closer to the White House, that message is very important indeed.[156]

However, calling the Army Corps of Engineers request for further study an "incredibly cumbersome, long, horrible permitting process," on January 24, newly elected President Donald Trump signed a presidential memorandum to advance the construction of the pipeline.[14][15]

Solidarity march in Denver

On September 8, about 500 Native Americans and other protesters marched in Denver to show solidarity with the Standing Rock Americans. State Representative Joe Salazar spoke about the safety of pipelines and described a recent Colorado Oil and Gas Association statement on oil pipeline safety as "full of lies."[157]

Solidarity march in Seattle

On September 16, a rally and march was held in Seattle to show solidarity with the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe. The mayor of Seattle and city council members joined leaders from Northwest tribes from Quinualt, Makah, Lummi, Suquamish, Tulalip, Swinomish, Puyallup and others to show opposition to the pipeline. Fawn Sharp, president of the Quinault Indian Nation and the Affiliated Tribes of Northwest Indians, said that while the tribes are "determined to win this fight", a "deeper fix" is needed. "The U.S. must recognize that we have political equality. This is much larger than a specific infrastructure project. It goes to the fundamental relationship."[158]

Cities declaring opposition to the pipeline

According to the Grand Forks Herald, on October 13 the governments of 19 cities, including St. Louis and Minneapolis, had passed ordinances to support the Standing Rock tribe in opposition of the pipeline.[159]

In October, the Morton County Sheriff requested police from surrounding areas to assist in regulating the protests near the pipeline. The Dane County Sheriff's office of Wisconsin sent 10 deputies to aid the local police,[160] but they were recalled a few days later because of opposition from the Dane County residents and county officials.[161]

Plea to President Obama to adhere to treaties

In an October 28 public statement, Chief Arvol Looking Horse, spiritual leader and Keeper of the Sacred Pipe Bundle of the Lakota/Dakota/Nakota Nations, invoked his role as the voice of traditional government of the Great Sioux Nation and called upon President Barack Obama to communicate "nation to nation, as indicated by our treaties."[162] Looking Horse called upon President Obama to keep his word:

When you met with our people on your campaign trail in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, you stated that you are a lawyer and understand treaty documents. You told us that you realized our treaties were violated and you would address these violations against our people if you became President. This was your Word.[162]

"National Day of Action"

On November 15, hundreds of cities held protests against the pipeline in a coordinated protest which organizers called a "National Day of Action."[163] Hundreds of protesters gathered peacefully in Chicago, Los Angeles, Manhattan, Denver, and other cities; dozens of protesters were arrested, including demonstrators in Mandan, North Dakota, where protesters were arrested after blocking a railroad.[164]

Tara Houska, Director for Honor the Earth, spoke at a rally in New York City saying, "Because of the power of social media and the millions of those at Standing Rock, the Army Corps are going to invite the tribe in to discuss their concerns."[164] Senator Bernie Sanders spoke at a protest in front of the White House. Robert Kennedy Jr. visited the protest camp and spoke to the protesters. He commented on the PBS Newshour: "I think they have a lot of courage. I think they're standing up for America, that they're standing up in the face of a bully."[128]

Thanksgiving Day protests

Thanksgiving Day has been described as a reminder of the strained relationship between the U.S. government and native people. On the November 24 holiday, several thousand continued to protest the pipeline; some estimated that the number of protesters, which fluctuates, doubled that day.[165] Hundreds of people joined the protest that day,[166] including groups from California,[167] Oregon,[168] Wisconsin,[169] Colorado,[170] South Carolina,[171] and Washington.[172]

Protesters built a floating bridge to Turtle Island, considered sacred ground, and 400 gathered near the bridge, some crossing over to perform a prayer ceremony.[165][173]

The influx of many new people over Thanksgiving weekend caused new problems, according to some activists. Some criticized a group of young, mostly white, people at the protest for treating it like a festival such as Burning Man by bringing drugs and alcohol, requiring supplies and provisions rather than sustaining themselves, or performing unsolicited live music.[174]

Actress Jane Fonda was one of a delegation of 50 people who served a Thanksgiving dinner in nearby Mandan, capturing media attention.[175][176] Business owners traveled from as far as Massachusetts[177] and Pennsylvania[178] to serve food to protesters at Standing Rock.

A Thanksgiving Day protest in Portland, Oregon drew about 350 in heavy rain.[179]

Support from military veterans

In November, a group called Veterans Stand for Standing Rock formed to participate in nonviolent intervention to defend the demonstrators from what the group has called "assault and intimidation at the hands of the militarized police force." According to The New York Times, "as many as 2,000 veterans" indicated that they would gather at the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation to serve as "human shields" for protesters. The organizers of these protests included a retired Baltimore police sergeant and Wes Clark, Jr., the son of former Supreme NATO Commander and 2004 presidential candidate Wesley Clark. Wes Clark, Jr is affiliated with The Young Turks.[180]

Following the executive order made by President Trump in January 2017 which overturned the decision of former President Obama to halt the construction of the pipeline and the February order in which he authorized the Army Corps of Engineers to proceed, US veterans returned to Standing Rock to a form human shield to protect Dakota Access pipeline protesters. Air force veteran Elizabeth Williams said, "We are prepared to put our bodies between Native elders and a privatized military force. We've stood in the face of fire before. We feel a responsibility to use the skills we have."[181]

Corporate support

In February 2017, Seattle, Washington's city council unanimously voted to not renew its contract with Wells Fargo in a move that cites the bank's role as a lender to the Dakota Access Pipeline project as well as its "creation of millions of bogus accounts" and said the bidding process for its next banking partner would involve "social responsibility." The City Council in Davis, California, took a similar action, voting unanimously to find a new bank to handle its accounts by the end of 2017.[182]

Native Nations Rise march in Washington D.C.

Native Nations March in Washington, DC. 2017

In March 2017, the Standing Rock Sioux tribe led a four-day protest in Washington D.C., culminating in the Native Nations Rise march on March 10. The protesters marched through the capital, pausing to erect a tipi at Trump International Hotel, and rallied in front of the White House.[183]

Reactions

In September 2016, Senator Bernie Sanders spoke to a crowd of about 3,000 members of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and other tribal nations and supporters at a protest held outside of the White House. Saying "the pipeline threatens the environment and water resources and exploits Native Americans", he asked President Obama to take action and conduct a full environmental and cultural impact analysis of the project, which he believed would kill the pipeline.[124] Following the use of the National Guard and police in riot gear to remove protesters from a protest camp in October, Sanders again called on the president to suspend construction of the pipeline. In a letter to the President, Sanders said in part: "It is deeply distressing to me that the federal government is putting the profits of the oil industry ahead of the treaty and sovereign rights of Native American communities. Mr. President, you took a bold and principled stand against the Keystone Pipeline – I ask you to take a similar stand against the Dakota Access Pipeline."[184]

Saying that the Dakota Access pipeline project is part of a "long history of pushing the impacts of pollution onto the most economically and politically disadvantaged people and communities across this country", Representative Raúl Grijalva, the ranking Democrat on the House Natural Resources Committee, on September 22 asked the Army Corps of Engineers to withdraw the existing permits for the pipeline.[33]

Saying "the project's current permits should be suspended and all construction stopped until a complete environmental and cultural review has been completed for the entire project", Senators Sanders, Dianne Feinstein, Ed Markey, Patrick Leahy and Benjamin Cardin on October 13 called on President Barack Obama to order a comprehensive environmental review of the pipeline project. They also requested stronger tribal consultation for the contested part of the route.[159]

Calling the proposed pipeline route "the ripest case of environmental racism I have seen in a long time", on October 26 the Reverend Jesse Jackson announced support for the movement, saying, "The tribes of this country have sacrificed a lot so this great country could be built. With promises broken, land stolen and sacred lands desecrated, the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe is standing up for their right to clean water. They have lost land for settlers to farm, more land for gold in the Black Hills, and then again, even more, land for the dam that was built for hydropower. When will the taking stop?"[36]

In September, Obama spoke to tribal representatives, saying, "I know that many of you have come together across tribes and across the country to support the community at Standing Rock. And together, you're making your voices heard." He again discussed the protest movement on November 2, saying:

We're monitoring this closely. My view is that there is a way for us to accommodate sacred lands of Native Americans. And I think that right now the Army Corps is examining whether there are ways to reroute this pipeline. We're going to let it play out for several more weeks and determine whether or not this can be resolved in a way that I think is properly attentive to the traditions of First Americans.[185]

Several members of the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives weighed in on the protest on November 29, 2016. Senators Al Franken of Minnesota and Cory Booker of New Jersey called upon U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch to investigate the tactics of law enforcement officers against peaceful protesters, and to send monitors to track any violence against protesters.[186] Several members of the House made statements as well, and Representative Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii announced plans to join hundreds of other military veterans in protecting the protesters in early December.[186]

Native American lacrosse players Lyle Thompson and his brothers Miles, Jeremy and Hiana and others including Bill O'Brien and Scott Marr, used social media to support the protesters. They visited the camp as well, bringing lacrosse sticks and organizing games, giving instructions to those who had never before played the game. Following President Trump's January 2017 reversal of the Court decisions made under the Obama administration, the players said that they planned to continue with their support. [187]

Following her unexpected win in the 2018 New York Democratic primary race, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez credited the time she spent at the protest camp as the reason for her decision run for political office. In an interview she recalled her visit to Standing Rock as a tipping point, saying that she had previously felt that the only way to effectively run for office was if you had access to wealth, social influence, and power. But her visit to North Dakota, where she saw others "putting their whole lives and everything that they had on the line for the protection of their community," inspired her to begin to work within her own community.[188]

United Nations presentation

On September 20, 2016, Standing Rock Chairman David Archambault II addressed the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, Switzerland, where he called "upon all parties to stop the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline." Citing the 1851 Treaty of Traverse des Sioux and 1868 Treaty of Fort Laramie, two treaties ratified by the U.S. Senate that recognize the Sioux's national sovereignty, Archambault told the Council that "the oil companies and the government of the United States have failed to respect our sovereign rights."[189]

On September 22, 2016, Victoria Tauli-Corpuz, a United Nations expert on the rights of indigenous peoples, admonished the U.S., saying, "The tribe was denied access to information and excluded from consultations at the planning stage of the project, and environmental assessments failed to disclose the presence and proximity of the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation." She also responded to the rights of pipeline protesters, saying, "The U.S. authorities should fully protect and facilitate the right to freedom of peaceful assembly of indigenous peoples, which plays a key role in empowering their ability to claim other rights."[190]

See also

• Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples
• Line 3 Pipeline
• Hindmarsh Island bridge controversy – a similar dispute in Australia in the 1990s involving a clash between indigenous rights and property rights
• Indigenous Environmental Network
• Indigenous land rights
• Indigenous rights
• Keystone Pipeline
• List of oil spills
• List of pipeline accidents in the United States in the 21st century
• List of United States treaties § U.S.–Native American treaties
• List of natural gas pipelines in North America
• List of oil pipelines in North America
• List of oil refineries in North America
• List of incidents of civil unrest in the United States
• #NODAPL
• Pipeline transport
• Treaty of Fort Laramie (1851)
• Treaty rights

References

1. Hayes, Kelly (October 28, 2016). "Remember This When You Talk About Standing Rock". Yes! Magazine. Retrieved November 3, 2016. It is crucial that people recognize that Standing Rock is part of an ongoing struggle against colonial violence. #NoDAPL is a front of struggle in a long-erased war against Native peoples — a war that has been active since the first contact and waged without interruption... So when you talk about Standing Rock, please begin by acknowledging that this pipeline was redirected from an area where it was most likely to impact white people.
2. Hawkins, Derek. "Activists and police trade blame after Dakota Access protester severely injured". washingtonpost.com. Washington Post. Retrieved February 22, 2017.
3. Skalicky, Sue. "Tension Between Police and Standing Rock Protesters Reaches Boiling Point". nytimes.com. New York Times. Retrieved February 22, 2017.
4. Levin, Sam. "Over 70 arrested at Standing Rock as Dakota Access aims to finish pipeline". theguardian.com. The Guardian. Retrieved February 22, 2017.
5. https://www.epa.gov/hfstudy
6. Javier, Carla. "A Timeline of the Year of Resistance at Standing Rock". Splinter. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
7. Liu, Louise (September 13, 2016). "Thousands of protesters are gathering in North Dakota – and it could lead to 'nationwide reform'". Business Insider. Retrieved September 20, 2016.
8. "Standing Rock Special: Unlicensed #DAPL Guards Attacked Water Protectors with Dogs & Pepper Spray". Democracy Now!. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
9. Skalicky, Sue; Davey, Monica (October 28, 2016). "Tension Between Police and Standing Rock Protesters Reaches Boiling Point". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved March 11, 2020.
10. Stelloh, Tim; Roecker, Molly; Sottile, Chiara A; Medina, Daniel A. (November 20, 2016). "Freezing protesters soaked with water in pipeline protest". NBC News. Retrieved March 11, 2020.
11. "Rolling Stone". Retrieved December 14, 2016.
12. "Standing Rock Sioux Tribe's Statement on U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Decision to Not Grant Easement". Stand With Standing Rock. December 4, 2016. Retrieved December 4, 2016.
13. "Dakota Access Pipeline to be rerouted". CNN. December 4, 2016. Retrieved December 4, 2016.
14. Mufson, Steven (January 24, 2017). "Trump gives green light to dakota access keystone xl oil pipelines". Washington Post. Washington, DC. Retrieved January 24, 2017.
15. Jacobs, Jennifer; Dlouhy, Jennifer A.; Vamburkar, Meenal (January 24, 2017). "Trump Pins Keystone and Dakota Pipeline Fate on Renegotiation". Bloomberg. Retrieved January 24, 2017.
16. Harder, Amy; Matthews, Christopher M. (February 7, 2017). "Trump Administration Gives Final Approval for Dakota Access Pipeline". Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved February 7, 2017.
17. Wong, Julia Carrie (February 23, 2017). "Police remove last Standing Rock protesters in military-style takeover". The Guardian. Retrieved February 23, 2017.
18. Renshaw, Jarrett (April 19, 2017). "East Coast refiner shuns Bakken delivery as Dakota Access Pipeline starts". Reuters. Retrieved May 11, 2017.
19. Beitsch, Rebecca. "Court sides with tribes in Dakota Access Pipeline case, ordering full environmental review". The Hill. Retrieved June 19, 2020.
20. William Petroski (August 25, 2014). "Should farmers make way for the Bakken pipeline?". Press Citizen. Retrieved October 25, 2016.
21. Gavin Aronsen (October 28, 2014). "Energy Transfer, Phillips 66 partner on Iowa pipeline". Ames Tribune.
22. Harte, Julia (October 5, 2016). "Federal appeals court hears arguments over Dakota Access pipeline". Reuters. Retrieved October 14, 2016.
23. Dalrymple, Amy (August 18, 2016). "Pipeline route plan first called for crossing north of Bismarck". The Bismarck Tribune. Archived from the original on November 1, 2016. Retrieved September 23, 2016.
24. McKibben, Bill (September 6, 2016). "A Pipeline Fight and America's Dark Past". The New Yorker. Retrieved October 25, 2016.
25. Moyers, Bill (September 9, 2016). "What You Need to Know About the Dakota Access Pipeline Protest". Common Dreams. Retrieved October 26, 2016.
26. ICTMN Staff (April 28, 2016). "Dakota Access Pipeline: Three Federal Agencies Side With Standing Rock Sioux, Demand Review". Indian Country Today Media Network. Archived from the original on September 4, 2016. Retrieved August 6, 2016.
27. Michael Leland, Iowa Public Radio (September 15, 2016). "Bakken pipeline opposition presents petitions to U.S. Justice Department". Radio Iowa. Retrieved September 25, 2016.
28. Bravebull Allard, LaDonna (September 3, 2016). "Why the Founder of Standing Rock Sioux Camp Can't Forget the Whitestone Massacre". Yes! Magazine. Retrieved October 25, 2016.
29. "Background on the Dakota Access Pipeline" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on September 9, 2016. Retrieved September 26, 2016.
30. Tannous, Nadya Raja (October 24, 2016). "Palestinians join Standing Rock Sioux to protest Dakota Access Pipeline Activism". Mondoweiss. Retrieved October 26, 2016.
31. Begay, Jade (September 28, 2016). "Indigenous Women Leaders of Dakota Access Pipeline Resistance to Speak Out For Protection of Earth and Water". About IEN. Common Dreams. Retrieved October 26, 2016.
32. Gray, Jim (September 8, 2016). "Standing Rock: The Biggest Story That No One's Covering". Indian Country Today Media Network. Retrieved October 25, 2016.
33. Medina, Daniel A. (September 23, 2016). "Dakota Pipeline Company Buys Ranch Near Sioux Protest Site, Records Show". NBC News. Retrieved September 24, 2016.
34. Grueskin, Caroline (October 24, 2016). "Protesters dig in amid fears of law enforcement raid". The Bismarck Tribune.
35. "Citing 1851 Treaty, Water Protectors Establish Road Blockade and Expand Frontline #NoDAPL Camp | Indigenous Rising". Indigenous Rising. October 23, 2016. Retrieved October 28, 2016.
36. The Seattle Times staff (October 26, 2016). "Live updates from Dakota Access Pipeline protests: 'It will be a battle here'". The Seattle Times. Retrieved October 26, 2016.
37. Silva, Daniella (October 27, 2016). "Dakota Access Pipeline: More Than 100 Arrested as Protesters Ousted From Camp". NBC News. Retrieved October 28, 2016.
38. "Developing: 100+ Militarized Police Raiding #NoDAPL Resistance Camp Blocking Pipeline's Path". Democracy Now!. October 27, 2016. Retrieved November 2, 2016.
39. "STOP THE DAKOTA ACCESS PIPELINE". Rezpect Our Water. Retrieved December 13, 2017.
40. Revesz, Rachael. "13-year-old Native American's petition to stop oil pipeline reaches 80,000 signatures". Independent. Retrieved December 13, 2017.
41. Bengal, Rebecca. "Inside the Movement to Stop the Dakota Access Pipeline". Vogue. Retrieved December 13, 2017.
42. Amundson, Barry (July 29, 2016). "Standing Rock tribe sues over Dakota Access pipeline permits". Grand Forks Herald. Retrieved August 6, 2016.
43. "Run For Your Life: NO DAPL A Relay Run In Opposition of Dakota Access Pipeline". Last Real Indians. Archived from the original on December 14, 2017. Retrieved December 13, 2017.
44. Dhillon, Jaskiran. "Indigenous Youth Are Building a Climate Justice Movement by Targeting Colonialism". Truthout. Retrieved December 13, 2017.
45. Petronzio, Matt. "How young Native Americans used social media to build up the #NoDAPL movement". Mashable. Retrieved December 13, 2017.
46. "15 Indigenous Women on the Frontlines of the Dakota Access Pipeline Resistance". EcoWatch. Retrieved December 14, 2017.
47. "Sept 30th DAPL meeting with SRST". youtube. Standing Rock Sioux Tribe. September 30, 2014. Retrieved November 27, 2016. from 5:48 (evocation of treaty boundaries: Fort Laramie Treaties (1851 and 1868) and standing resolution from 2012). Afterwards, Chuck Frey (VP of ETP) makes a presentation of the DAPL project.
48. Mufson, Steven (November 25, 2016). "A Dakota pipeline's last stand". Washington Post. Retrieved December 14, 2016.
49. Petroski, William (October 14, 2014). "Branstad won't stop Bakken oil pipeline through Iowa". The Des Moines Register. Retrieved November 5, 2016.
50. staff (March 16, 2015). "Meskwaki Nation Opposes New Pipeline Threat That Could Rival Keystone". ICTMW. Retrieved November 5, 2016.
51. William Petroski (March 16, 2015). "Meskwaki tribe opposes Bakken oil pipeline through Iowa". USA Today. Retrieved April 8, 2015.
52. "Coalition Support of Tribal Lawsuits Against US Army Corps Permits for the Dakota Access Pipeline". Indigenous Rising. September 3, 2016. Retrieved September 22, 2016.
53. Dunlap, Tiare (August 5, 2016). "These Native American Youths Are Running 2,000 Miles to Protect Their Water". People. Retrieved August 6, 2016.
54. MacPherson, James (July 30, 2016). "Standing Rock Sioux sues Corps over Bakken pipeline permits". The Des Moines Register. The Associated Press. Retrieved August 6, 2016.
55. Healy, Jack (August 23, 2016). "Occupying the Prairie: Tensions Rise as Tribes Move to Block a Pipeline". The New York Times. Retrieved August 24, 2016.
56. Yardley, William (August 27, 2016). "With echoes of Wounded Knee, tribes mount prairie occupation to block North Dakota pipeline". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved August 28, 2016.
57. Fulton, Deirdre (September 1, 2016). "'World Watching' as Tribal Members Put Bodies in Path of Dakota Pipeline". Common Dreams. Retrieved September 6, 2016.
58. theresa (August 23, 2016). "Native Nations Rally in Support of Standing Rock Sioux". Indian Country Today Media Network.com. Archived from the original on August 25, 2016. Retrieved August 24, 2016.
59. "Arrest warrants issued for Jill Stein, running mate after N.D. protest". Retrieved September 8, 2016.
60. "Showdown over oil pipeline becomes a national movement for Native Americans". Washington Post. Retrieved September 8, 2016.
61. Northcott, Charlie (September 2, 2016). "Life in the Native American oil protest camps". BBC. Retrieved November 3, 2016.
62. McCauley, Lauren (September 5, 2016). "'Is That Not Genocide?' Pipeline Co. Bulldozing Burial Sites Prompts Emergency Motion". Common Dreams.
63. Amy Goodman (September 4, 2016). "VIDEO: Dakota Access Pipeline Company Attacks Native American Protesters with Dogs and Pepper Spray". democracynow.org. Democracy Now!. Retrieved September 11, 2016.
64. Manning, Sarah Sunshine (September 4, 2016). "'And Then the Dogs Came': Dakota Access Gets Violent, Destroys Graves, Sacred Sites". Indian Country Today Media Network.com. Retrieved September 6, 2016.
65. "Dakota Access Pipeline Company Attacks Native American Protesters with Dogs & Pepper Spray".
66. Levin, Sam (September 12, 2016). "North Dakota arrest warrant for Amy Goodman raises fears for press freedom". Guardian. Retrieved September 17, 2016.
67. Naureckas, Jim (September 15, 2016). "Colleagues Mostly Fail to Rally for Amy Goodman, Threatened With Jail for Journalism". fair.org. Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting. Retrieved September 17, 2016.
68. Dalrymple, Amy (September 6, 2016). "Dakota pipeline protest criticized". Duluth News Tribune.
69. "Law enforcement issues statement on Dakota Access Pipeline protest". Fox News. September 3, 2016. Retrieved September 19, 2016.
70. Donovan, Lauren (August 12, 2016). "Standing Rock Sioux Chairman Dave Archambault arrested at Dakota Access Pipeline protest". Bismarck Tribune. Retrieved November 3, 2016.
71. MacPherson, James (August 15, 2016). "Dakota Access pipeline owners sue North Dakota protesters". Big Story. Associated Press. Retrieved November 3, 2016.
72. Brown, Alleen (October 4, 2019). "Dakota Access Pipeline Activists Face 110 Years in Prison, Two Years After Confessing Sabotage". The Intercept. Retrieved March 13, 2020.
73. Fortin, Jacey (October 2, 2019). "2 Dakota Pipeline Protesters Face Federal Charges Over 2017 Damage". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved March 13, 2020.
74. Dennis J Bernstein (September 10, 2016). "Green Party Candidates Face Arrest: An Interview with Green Party VP Candidate Ajamu Baraka". reader supported news.
75. Grueskin, Caroline (October 11, 2016). "Democracy Now reporter to return to state to face charges". Bismarck Tribune. Retrieved October 20, 2016.
76. Taibbi, Matt (October 13, 2016). "Journalist Amy Goodman Shouldn't Be Arrested for Covering Dakota Pipeline Story". Rolling Stone. Retrieved October 20, 2016.
77. "Canadian photojournalist detained for hours, refused entry to U.S." November 30, 2016.
78. "U.S. border agents stopped Canadian journalist from entry and confiscated his phones without a warrant". Retrieved December 14, 2016.
79. "Amnesty International USA to Monitor to North Dakota Pipeline Protests". Amnesty International USA. Retrieved October 29, 2016.
80. Ratner, Lizzy (October 15, 2016). "Amy Goodman Is Facing Prison for Reporting on the Dakota Access Pipeline. That Should Scare Us All". The Nation. Retrieved October 15, 2016.
81. "MEDIA ADVISORY: Journalist Amy Goodman to Turn Herself in to North Dakota Authorities". Democracy Now!. October 13, 2016. Retrieved October 13, 2016.
82. "Arrest warrant for muckraking U.S. journalist – Committee to Protect Journalists". Committee to Protect Journalists. September 12, 2016. Retrieved October 13, 2016.
83. Grueskin, Caroline" (September 12, 2016). "Charge against reporter 'raises a red flag'". Bismarck Tribune. Retrieved October 13, 2016.
84. Greenberg, Will (October 17, 2016). "Judge Throws Out Charges Against Journalist Who Covered Dakota Access Pipeline". Mother Jones.
85. "Press Freedom Victory: Riot Charges Dropped Against Amy Goodman Over Dakota Pipeline Coverage". Democracy Now!. October 18, 2016. Retrieved October 18, 2016.
86. "Dakota Excess Pipeline? Standing Rock Protectors Strip-Searched, Jailed for Days on Minor Charges". Democracy Now!. October 17, 2016. Retrieved October 18, 2016.
87. "Actress Shailene Woodley Reveals She Was Strip-Searched After Her Arrest Protesting Dakota Pipeline". Democracy Now!. October 20, 2016. Retrieved October 20, 2016.
88. "North Dakota pipeline activists say arrested protesters were kept in dog kennels". LA Times. Retrieved February 23, 2017.
89. "Dakota Access protesters accuse police of putting them in 'dog kennels,' marking them with numbers". Washington Post. Retrieved February 23, 2017.
90. Levin, Sam; Woolf, Nicky; Carrington, Damian (October 28, 2016). "North Dakota pipeline: 141 arrests as protesters pushed back from site". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved October 28, 2016.
91. PBS staff (November 2, 2016). "Tensions escalating in Dakota Access pipeline standoff, Obama suggests reroute". PBS Newshour. Retrieved November 3, 2016.
92. Caroline Grueskin. "Governor issues emergency declaration in response to pipeline protests". Bismarck Tribune. Retrieved November 2, 2016.
93. "Police & Military Attack Oceti Sakowin Treaty Camp – UNICORN RIOT". UNICORN RIOT. October 27, 2016. Retrieved November 2, 2016.
94. "Riot police move in on North Dakota pipeline protesters". BBC News. October 28, 2016. Retrieved November 2, 2016.
95. Thorbecke, Catherine (October 28, 2016). "Oregon Siege and North Dakota Protest: Both Land Battles, But Similarities End There". ABC News. Retrieved October 31, 2016.
96. Eversley, Melanie (October 29, 2016). "Dakota Access pipeline protests draw contrasts to Bundy". USA Today. Retrieved October 31, 2016.
97. Madison Park; Mayra Cuevas. "Dakota Access Pipeline clashes turn violent". CNN.
98. Julia Carrie Wong (November 21, 2016). "Dakota Access pipeline: 300 protesters injured after police use water cannons". The Guardian. Retrieved November 22, 2016.
99. "Pipeline protesters decry police tactics after woman's arm 'blown out'".
100. "Press conference: Morton County Sheriff's Department on DAPL protest". November 21, 2016.
101. "Standing Rock water protector may lose arm after Sunday's clash with police says family". APTN National News. November 22, 2016. Retrieved November 22, 2016.
102. Julia Carrie Wong (November 22, 2016). "Dakota Access pipeline protester 'may lose her arm' after police standoff". The Guardian. Retrieved November 22, 2016. The Standing Rock Medic & Healer Council refuted law enforcement's claims in a statement, citing eye-witness accounts of seeing police throw concussion grenades, 'the lack of charring of flesh at the wound site' and 'grenade pieces that have been removed from her arm in surgery and will be saved for legal proceedings'.
103. Wong, Julia Carrie (November 22, 2016). "Dakota Access pipeline protester 'may lose her arm' after police standoff". The Guardian. Retrieved November 23, 2016.
104. "Father of Activist Injured at Standing Rock Calls on Obama to Stop Dakota Access Pipeline Drilling". Democracy Now!. Retrieved November 23, 2016.
105. Blau, Max. "Dakota Access Pipeline: Protester nearly loses arm after explosion". CNN. Retrieved November 23, 2016.
106. Hawkins, Derek. "Activists and police trade blame after Dakota Access protester severely injured". Washington Post. Retrieved November 23, 2016.
107. Nicholson, Blake; Forliti, Amy (November 23, 2016). "Father of injured pipeline protester says she may lose arm". The Associated Press. Retrieved November 23, 2016.
108. "Propane cylinders recovered at explosion site of DAPL protest". Retrieved November 24, 2016.
109. Nicholson, Blake (January 9, 2017). "Corps, tribes to judge: Reject Dakota Access company request". The Associated Press. Retrieved January 10, 2017.
110. Nicholson, Blake (January 10, 2017). "Dakota Access protest policing costs exceed $22M". The Seattle Times. The Associated Press. Retrieved January 10, 2017.
111. "North Dakota, feds address garbage left at pipeline protest camp". Spokesman.com. Retrieved March 5, 2017.
112. Cuevas, Mayra; Sidner, Sara; Simon, Darran (February 24, 2017). "Dakota Access Pipeline protest site is cleared". CNN. Retrieved March 1, 2017.
113. "Major cleanup underway at pipeline protest camps". WSAW. Wausau. CNN. February 7, 2017. Retrieved March 27, 2018.
     "Crews scramble to clear tons of trash left behind by pipeline protesters". KCCI. Des Moines. Associated Press. February 16, 2017. Retrieved March 27, 2018.
     "Police Sort Through Protest Camp Trash for Contraband". NBC News. KFYR. February 6, 2017. Retrieved March 27, 2018.
114. Sylvester, Terray (February 22, 2017). "Dakota pipeline protest camp nearly empty as holdouts face removal". Reuters. Retrieved March 27, 2018.
     Blackmon, David (February 14, 2017). "Threat Of Flooding Rises At Dakota Access Protest Site". Forbes. Retrieved March 27, 2018.
115. Richardson, Valerie (March 13, 2017). "Dakota Access protest camps cleared after $1.1 million federal cleanup; four more dogs rescued". Washington Times.
116. Crookston, Paul (February 27, 2017). "Puppies Freezing and Abandoned in the Aftermath of the Dakota Access Pipeline Protest". National Review. Retrieved March 27, 2018.
     Obregon, Stephen (February 27, 2017). "Dakota Access Pipeline Protesters Leave Their Dogs Behind". Washington Free Beacon. Retrieved March 27, 2018.
     "Puppies rescued from abandoned Dakota Access Pipeline campsite". WBBH. Fort Myers, Florida. February 26, 2017. Retrieved March 27, 2018.
117. "Feds moves in to clean up Dakota Access protest camp; thorny skate will not be on endangered list". Washington Post. Associated Press. February 25, 2017. Retrieved March 27, 2018.
     Richardson, Valerie (March 1, 2017). "Crews haul off 48 million pounds of garbage, debris from Dakota Access protest camp". Washington Times. Retrieved March 27, 2018.
     Richardson, Valerie (March 19, 2017). "Garbage haul at Dakota Access camps revised downward to 21 million pounds". Washington Times. Retrieved March 27, 2018.
118. Haney, Don (March 9, 2017). "Contractor nearly finished $1 million clean-up of pipeline protest camps". KFGO. Fargo. Retrieved March 27, 2018.
119. Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (July 27, 2016). "Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief" (PDF). In the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (1:16-cv-01534-Document 1). Retrieved August 6, 2016.
120. Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (August 4, 2016). "Memorandum in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction Expedited Hearing Requested" (PDF) (1:16-cv-1534-JEB). United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 7, 2016. Retrieved August 6, 2016. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
121. Monet, Jenni (September 10, 2016). "Standing Rock Sioux tribe claims small victory in pipeline battle". pbs.org. Retrieved September 17, 2016.
122. Dept. of Justice (September 9, 2016). "Joint Statement from the Department of Justice, the Department of the Army and the Department of the Interior Regarding Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers". Office of Public Affairs, United States Department of Justice. Retrieved September 17, 2016.
123. Medina, Daniel A. (November 4, 2016). "Dakota Access Pipeline: What's Behind the Protests?". NBC News. Retrieved November 5, 2016.
124. Gaudiano, Nicole (September 13, 2016). "Bernie Sanders, Native Americans say oil pipeline will poison drinking water". USA Today.
125. "Corps: More discussion needed before agency will approve Dakota..." Archived from the original on November 29, 2016. Retrieved November 18, 2016.
126. James MacPherson; Blake Nicholson (November 15, 2016). "Pipeline Company Seeks Court Permission to Proceed With Plan". ABC news. Retrieved November 18, 2016.
127. Forum News Service (November 14, 2016). "Corps: More discussion needed before agency will approve Dakota Access easement". Bemidji Pioneer. Bemidji Pioneer and Forum Communications Company. Archived from the original on November 29, 2016. Retrieved November 18, 2016.
128. "CEO behind Dakota Access to protesters: 'We're building the pipeline'". PBS Newshour. November 16, 2016. Retrieved November 22, 2016.
129. Healy, Jack; Fandos, Nicholas (December 5, 2016). "Protesters Gain Victory in Fight over Oil Pipeline near Sioux Reservation: Army Blocks Drilling and Says It Will Seek a New Route". The New York Times. p. A1. Retrieved December 5, 2016.
130. U.S. Army (December 4, 2016). "Army will not grant easement for Dakota Access Pipeline crossing". U.S. Army ASA (CW) Press Release. Archived from the original on December 4, 2016. Retrieved December 5, 2016.
131. "Energy Transfer Partners and Sunoco Logistics Partners Respond to the Statement from the Department of the Army – Business Wire". Retrieved December 14, 2016.
132. CNN. "Trump advances controversial oil pipelines with executive action". Retrieved December 11, 2017.
133. "FAQ: Standing Rock Litigation". Earthjustice. February 14, 2017. Retrieved December 11, 2017.
134. "The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe's Litigation on the Dakota Access Pipeline". Earth Justice. Retrieved December 11, 2017.
135. "Judge Orders More Reviews of Dakota Access Pipeline". June 15, 2017. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
136. "Federal judge orders more environmental analysis of Dakota pipeline". Reuters. June 15, 2017. Retrieved December 11, 2017.
137. "Home". www.nodaplpoliticalprisoners.org. Retrieved June 12, 2019.
138. "Water Protector Prisoners". Water Protector Legal Collective. Retrieved June 12, 2019.
139. "Standing Rock activist accused of firing at police gets nearly five years in prison". The Guardian. Associated Press. July 12, 2018. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved June 12, 2019.
140. Taibbi, Matt; Taibbi, Matt (October 13, 2016). "Taibbi on Amy Goodman Arrest for Covering Dakota Pipeline Story". Rolling Stone. Retrieved June 23, 2019.
141. "Jill Stein reaches plea deal over arrest at Standing Rock protest". The Guardian. Associated Press. August 9, 2017. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved June 23, 2019.
142. "Shailene Woodley: The Truth About My Arrest". Time. Retrieved June 23, 2019.
143. Brown, Alleen (November 27, 2016). "Arrests of Journalists at Standing Rock Test the Boundaries of the First Amendment". The Intercept. Retrieved June 23, 2019.
144. "ND State Criminal Cases". Water Protector Legal Collective. Retrieved June 23, 2019.
145. May, Charlie. "A reporter's notebook:The journey to Oceti Sakowin, the protest camp of the Standing Rock Sioux". salon. Retrieved May 15, 2017.
146. Brown, Alleen. "Leaked Documents Reveal Counterterrorism Tactics Used at Standing Rock to "Defeat Pipeline Insurgencies"". The Intercept. Retrieved May 30, 2017.
147. Hersher, Rebecca (February 7, 2017). "Army Approves Dakota Access Pipeline Route, Paving Way For The Project's Completion".
148. Sharman, Jon. "Standing Rock protesters 'won't back down' over Dakota Access Pipeline after Donald Trump executive action". The Independent.
149. Von Pinnon, Matthew (February 13, 2017). "Actress Woodley urges boycott of Dakota Access pipeline banks on 'Late Show with Stephen Colbert'".
150. Hutson-Miller, Kaylea M. (August 30, 2016). "Show of support: Local tribes among those backing Standing Rock Sioux effort". The Shawnee News Star. Retrieved September 26, 2016.
151. Bernie Sanders releases a statement opposing Dakota Access Pipeline. KSFY, August 25, 2016.
152. "Jordan Chariton". TYT Network. March 13, 2016. Retrieved December 3, 2016.
153. Fearless, J. H. (November 24, 2016). "How the Nation's Artists Are Standing with Standing Rock".
154. Petronzio, Matt. "How young Native Americans built and sustained the #NoDAPL movement". Mashable.
155. Petronzio, Matt. "How young Native Americans used social media to build up the #NoDAPL movement". Mashable. Retrieved October 18, 2017.
156. Klein, Naomi. "The Lesson from Standing Rock: Organizing and Resistance Can Win". The Nation. Retrieved November 6, 2017.
157. Kieran Nicholson (September 8, 2016). "North Dakota oil pipeline protest finds support in Denver, hundreds gather at State Capitol". The Denver Post. Retrieved September 30, 2016.
158. Lynda V. Mapes (September 17, 2016). "Tribes march in Seattle to back Standing Rock Sioux in North Dakota pipeline fight". The Seattle Times. Retrieved September 29, 2016.
159. Valerie Volcovici (October 13, 2016). "Sanders, 4 other senators request Dakota pipeline review as 19 cities support tribe". Grand Forks Herald. Retrieved October 14, 2016.
160. Ed Treleven (October 13, 2016). "Dane County sends 10 deputies to North Dakota to help at pipeline protests". Wisconsin State Journal. Retrieved November 22, 2016.
161. George Hesselberg (October 13, 2016). "Dane County sheriff pulls deputies back from North Dakota pipeline deployment". Wisconsin State Journal. Retrieved November 22, 2016.
162. Looking Horse, Chief Arvol (October 28, 2016). "Chief Arvol Looking Horse to Obama: Keep Your Word". Indian Country Today Media Network. Retrieved October 29, 2016.
163. "Dakota Access Pipeline Protests Spread to 300 Cities as Pipeline Owner Sues to Continue Construction". Democracy Now. November 16, 2016. Retrieved November 16, 2016.
164. Daniel A. Medina; Chiara Sottile (November 16, 2016). "Scores Arrested in Dakota Access Pipeline Protests Nationwide". NBC news. Retrieved November 22, 2016.
165. "Protesters Mark A Solemn Thanksgiving Day At Standing Rock". National Public Radio. Retrieved November 28, 2016.
166. "Hundreds pour into Standing Rock ahead of Thanksgiving". Retrieved November 28, 2016.
167. "San Jose helps Standing Rock Sioux protest Big Oil, pipeline". Retrieved November 28, 2016.
168. "KEZI.com – Eugene Group Heads to Standing Rock for Thanksgiving". November 21, 2016. Archived from the original on November 28, 2016. Retrieved November 28, 2016.
169. Burnley, Alexandra. "Northcentral Wisconsin pipeline protesters spend Thanksgiving at Standing Rock". Archived from the original on November 28, 2016. Retrieved November 28, 2016.
170. "Durango Protesters To Join Standing Rock For Thanksgiving". Archived from the original on March 5, 2017. Retrieved November 27, 2016.
171. Smith, Kelly Rae. "Charlestonians from Standing Rock on Thanksgiving week: "We need people"". Retrieved November 28, 2016.
172. "Standing Rock caravan leaves from Port Townsend – Peninsula Daily News". November 21, 2016. Retrieved November 28, 2016.
173. Tribune, BLAIR EMERSON Bismarck. "Protesters vow to "reclaim" land, bridge Thursday". Retrieved November 28, 2016.
174. Dowd, Katie (November 30, 2016). "Standing Rock activists asking white people to stop treating pipeline protest like Burning Man". San Francisco Chronicle.
175. O'Donnell, Carey (November 22, 2016). "Jane Fonda Will Serve Thanksgiving Dinner To The Standing Rock Protestors". Retrieved November 28, 2016.
176. Thorbecke, Catherine (November 24, 2016). "Thanksgiving at Dakota Access Pipeline Protest". Retrieved November 28, 2016.
177. Gentile, Derek. "Great Barrington chef cooks Thanksgiving dinner at Standing Rock". Retrieved November 28, 2016.
178. Gammage, Jeff (November 23, 2016). "Philly restaurateurs to serve Thanksgiving dinner at Standing Rock". Philly.com. The Philadelphia Inquirer. Retrieved December 14, 2016.
179. Theen, Andrew (November 24, 2016). "Standing Rock rally draws hundreds to downtown Portland". Retrieved December 14, 2016.
180. "Veterans to Serve as 'Human Shields' for Dakota Pipeline Protesters". The New York Times. November 29, 2016. Retrieved December 2, 2016.
181. Osborne, Samuel (February 10, 2017). "US veterans return to Standing Rock to form human shield to protect Dakota Access pipeline protesters".
182. Chappell, Bill (February 8, 2017). "2 Cities To Pull More Than $3 Billion From Wells Fargo Over Dakota Access Pipeline".2 Cities To Pull More Than $3 Billion From Wells Fargo Over Dakota Access Pipeline
183. Gambino, Lauren (March 10, 2017). "Native Americans take Dakota Access pipeline protest to Washington". The Guardian. Retrieved March 10, 2017.
184. "Sanders Calls on President to Intervene in Dakota Access Pipeline Dispute". Bernie Sanders. October 28, 2016. Retrieved October 29, 2016.
185. Eilperin, Juliet; Hawkins, Derek (November 1, 2016). "On Dakota Access, Obama says Army Corps is weighing whether to 'reroute' pipeline". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 3, 2016.
186. Tesfaye, Sophia (November 29, 2016). "Congress finally begins to notice the Dakota Access Pipeline protests at Standing Rock". Salon.
187. Grossman, Evan. "Leading lacrosse figures join resistance against President Trump and Dakota Access Pipeline". Daily News. Retrieved December 11, 2017.
188. Paiella, Gabriella. "The 28-Year-Old at the Center of One of This Year's Most Exciting Primaries". The Cut. Retrieved July 2, 2018.
189. Medina, Daniel A. (September 20, 2016). "Standing Rock Sioux Takes Pipeline Fight to UN Human Rights Council in Geneva". NBC News. Retrieved October 26, 2016.
190. Germanos, Andrea (September 25, 2016). "UN Experts to United States: Stop DAPL Now". Common Dreams. Retrieved September 27, 2016.

External links

• Camp of the Sacred Stones - First Water Protectors camp formed at Standing Rock
• Water Protector Legal Collective - Non-profit legal organization formed to defend Water Protectors
• ReZpect Our Water - Standing Rock Youth and Water Runners
• NoDAPL Twitter feed
• NoDAPL Archive
• Memorandum Opinion of "Standing Rock Sioux Tribe vs U.S. Army Corps of Engineers" - September 2016 - U.S. District Court
• DAPL Pipeline Facts - Oil Industry information about the pipeline