Color vision

Color vision is an ability of animals to perceive differences between light composed of different wavelengths (i.e., different spectral power distributions) independently of light intensity. Color perception is a part of the larger visual system and is mediated by a complex process between neurons that begins with differential stimulation of different types of photoreceptors by light entering the eye. Those photoreceptors then emit outputs that are propagated through many layers of neurons and then ultimately to the brain. Color vision is found in many animals and is mediated by similar underlying mechanisms with common types of biological molecules and a complex history of evolution in different animal taxa. In primates, color vision may have evolved under selective pressure for a variety of visual tasks including the foraging for nutritious young leaves, ripe fruit, and flowers, as well as detecting predator camouflage and emotional states in other primates.[1][2][3]

Colorless, green, and red photographic filters as imaged by camera

Wavelength and hue detection in humans

Isaac Newton discovered that white light, after being split into its component colors when passed through a dispersive prism, could be recombined to make white light by passing them through a different prism.

The characteristic colors are, from long to short wavelengths (and, correspondingly, from low to high frequency), red, orange, yellow, green, blue, and violet. Sufficient differences in wavelength cause a difference in the perceived hue; the just-noticeable difference in wavelength varies from about 1 nm in the blue-green and yellow wavelengths, to 10 nm and more in the longer red and shorter blue wavelengths. Although the human eye can distinguish up to a few hundred hues, when those pure spectral colors are mixed together or diluted with white light, the number of distinguishable chromaticities can be quite high.

In very low light levels, vision is scotopic: light is detected by rod cells of the retina. Rods are maximally sensitive to wavelengths near 500 nm, and play little, if any, role in color vision. In brighter light, such as daylight, vision is photopic: light is detected by cone cells which are responsible for color vision. Cones are sensitive to a range of wavelengths, but are most sensitive to wavelengths near 555 nm. Between these regions, mesopic vision comes into play and both rods and cones provide signals to the retinal ganglion cells. The shift in color perception from dim light to daylight gives rise to differences known as the Purkinje effect.

The perception of "white" is formed by the entire spectrum of visible light, or by mixing colors of just a few wavelengths in animals with few types of color receptors. In humans, white light can be perceived by combining wavelengths such as red, green, and blue, or just a pair of complementary colors such as blue and yellow.[4]

Physiology of color perception
Normalized response spectra of human cones, to monochromatic spectral stimuli, with wavelength given in nanometers.
The same figures as above represented here as a single curve in three (normalized cone response) dimensions
Photopic relative brightness sensitivity of the human visual system as a function of wavelength (luminosity function)

Perception of color begins with specialized retinal cells containing pigments with different spectral sensitivities, known as cone cells. In humans, there are three types of cones sensitive to three different spectra, resulting in trichromatic color vision.

Each individual cone contains pigments composed of opsin apoprotein, which is covalently linked to either 11-cis-hydroretinal or more rarely 11-cis-dehydroretinal.[5]

The cones are conventionally labeled according to the ordering of the wavelengths of the peaks of their spectral sensitivities: short (S), medium (M), and long (L) cone types. These three types do not correspond well to particular colors as we know them. Rather, the perception of color is achieved by a complex process that starts with the differential output of these cells in the retina and which is finalized in the visual cortex and associative areas of the brain.

For example, while the L cones have been referred to simply as red receptors, microspectrophotometry has shown that their peak sensitivity is in the greenish-yellow region of the spectrum. Similarly, the S- and M-cones do not directly correspond to blue and green, although they are often described as such. The RGB color model, therefore, is a convenient means for representing color, but is not directly based on the types of cones in the human eye.

The peak response of human cone cells varies, even among individuals with so-called normal color vision;[6] in some non-human species this polymorphic variation is even greater, and it may well be adaptive.[7]

Theories

Two complementary theories of color vision are the trichromatic theory and the opponent process theory. The trichromatic theory, or Young–Helmholtz theory, proposed in the 19th century by Thomas Young and Hermann von Helmholtz, as mentioned above, states that the retina's three types of cones are preferentially sensitive to blue, green, and red. Ewald Hering proposed the opponent process theory in 1872.[8] It states that the visual system interprets color in an antagonistic way: red vs. green, blue vs. yellow, black vs. white. Both theories are generally accepted as valid, describing different stages in visual physiology, visualized in the adjacent diagram.[9] Green ←→ Magenta and Blue ←→ Yellow are scales with mutually exclusive boundaries. In the same way that there cannot exist a "slightly negative" positive number, a single eye cannot perceive a bluish-yellow or a reddish-green. Although these two theories are both currently widely accepted theories, past and more recent work has led to criticism of the opponent process theory, stemming from a number of what are presented as discrepancies in the standard opponent process theory. For example, the phenomenon of an after-image of complementary color can be induced by fatiguing the cells responsible for color perception, by staring at a vibrant color for a length of time, and then looking at a white surface. This phenomenon of complementary colors demonstrates cyan, rather than green, to be the complement of red and magenta, rather than red, to be the complement of green, as well as demonstrating, as a consequence, that the reddish-green color proposed to be impossible by opponent process theory is, in fact, the colour yellow. Although this phenomenon is more readily explained by the trichromatic theory, explanations for the discrepancy may include alterations to the opponent process theory, such as redefining the opponent colours as red vs. cyan, to reflect this effect. Despite such criticisms, both theories remain in use.

Cone cells in the human eye
Cone typeNameRangePeak wavelength[10][11]
Sβ400–500 nm420–440 nm
Mγ450–630 nm534–555 nm
Lρ500–700 nm564–580 nm

A range of wavelengths of light stimulates each of these receptor types to varying degrees. The brain combines the information from each type of receptor to give rise to different perceptions of different wavelengths of light.

The opsins (photopigments) present in the L and M cones are encoded on the X chromosome; defective encoding of these leads to the two most common forms of color blindness. The OPN1LW gene, which codes for the opsin present in the L cones, is highly polymorphic (a recent study by Verrelli and Tishkoff found 85 variants in a sample of 236 men).[12] A very small percentage of women may have an extra type of color receptor because they have different alleles for the gene for the L opsin on each X chromosome. X chromosome inactivation means that while only one opsin is expressed in each cone cell, both types occur overall, and some women may therefore show a degree of tetrachromatic color vision.[13] Variations in OPN1MW, which codes the opsin expressed in M cones, appear to be rare, and the observed variants have no effect on spectral sensitivity.

Color in the human brain
Visual pathways in the human brain. The ventral stream (purple) is important in color recognition. The dorsal stream (green) is also shown. They originate from a common source in the visual cortex.

Color processing begins at a very early level in the visual system (even within the retina) through initial color opponent mechanisms. Both Helmholtz's trichromatic theory, and Hering's opponent process theory are therefore correct, but trichromacy arises at the level of the receptors, and opponent processes arise at the level of retinal ganglion cells and beyond. In Hering's theory opponent mechanisms refer to the opposing color effect of red–green, blue–yellow, and light–dark. However, in the visual system, it is the activity of the different receptor types that are opposed. Some midget retinal ganglion cells oppose L and M cone activity, which corresponds loosely to red–green opponency, but actually runs along an axis from blue-green to magenta. Small bistratified retinal ganglion cells oppose input from the S cones to input from the L and M cones. This is often thought to correspond to blue–yellow opponency, but actually runs along a color axis from yellow-green to violet.

Visual information is then sent to the brain from retinal ganglion cells via the optic nerve to the optic chiasma: a point where the two optic nerves meet and information from the temporal (contralateral) visual field crosses to the other side of the brain. After the optic chiasma the visual tracts are referred to as the optic tracts, which enter the thalamus to synapse at the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN).

The lateral geniculate nucleus is divided into laminae (zones), of which there are three types: the M-laminae, consisting primarily of M-cells, the P-laminae, consisting primarily of P-cells, and the koniocellular laminae. M- and P-cells receive relatively balanced input from both L- and M-cones throughout most of the retina, although this seems to not be the case at the fovea, with midget cells synapsing in the P-laminae. The koniocellular laminae receive axons from the small bistratified ganglion cells.[14][15]

After synapsing at the LGN, the visual tract continues on back to the primary visual cortex (V1) located at the back of the brain within the occipital lobe. Within V1 there is a distinct band (striation). This is also referred to as "striate cortex", with other cortical visual regions referred to collectively as "extrastriate cortex". It is at this stage that color processing becomes much more complicated.

In V1 the simple three-color segregation begins to break down. Many cells in V1 respond to some parts of the spectrum better than others, but this "color tuning" is often different depending on the adaptation state of the visual system. A given cell that might respond best to long wavelength light if the light is relatively bright might then become responsive to all wavelengths if the stimulus is relatively dim. Because the color tuning of these cells is not stable, some believe that a different, relatively small, population of neurons in V1 is responsible for color vision. These specialized "color cells" often have receptive fields that can compute local cone ratios. Such "double-opponent" cells were initially described in the goldfish retina by Nigel Daw;[16][17] their existence in primates was suggested by David H. Hubel and Torsten Wiesel and subsequently proven by Bevil Conway.[18] As Margaret Livingstone and David Hubel showed, double opponent cells are clustered within localized regions of V1 called blobs, and are thought to come in two flavors, red–green and blue–yellow.[19] Red–green cells compare the relative amounts of red–green in one part of a scene with the amount of red–green in an adjacent part of the scene, responding best to local color contrast (red next to green). Modeling studies have shown that double-opponent cells are ideal candidates for the neural machinery of color constancy explained by Edwin H. Land in his retinex theory.[20]

When viewed in full size, this image contains about 16 million pixels, each corresponding to a different color on the full set of RGB colors. The human eye can distinguish about 10 million different colors.[21]

From the V1 blobs, color information is sent to cells in the second visual area, V2. The cells in V2 that are most strongly color tuned are clustered in the "thin stripes" that, like the blobs in V1, stain for the enzyme cytochrome oxidase (separating the thin stripes are interstripes and thick stripes, which seem to be concerned with other visual information like motion and high-resolution form). Neurons in V2 then synapse onto cells in the extended V4. This area includes not only V4, but two other areas in the posterior inferior temporal cortex, anterior to area V3, the dorsal posterior inferior temporal cortex, and posterior TEO.[22][23] Area V4 was initially suggested by Semir Zeki to be exclusively dedicated to color, but this is now thought to be incorrect.[24] In particular, the presence in V4 of orientation-selective cells led to the view that V4 is involved in processing both color and form associated with color.[25] Color processing in the extended V4 occurs in millimeter-sized color modules called globs.[22][23] This is the first part of the brain in which color is processed in terms of the full range of hues found in color space.[22][23]

Anatomical studies have shown that neurons in extended V4 provide input to the inferior temporal lobe. "IT" cortex is thought to integrate color information with shape and form, although it has been difficult to define the appropriate criteria for this claim. Despite this murkiness, it has been useful to characterize this pathway (V1 > V2 > V4 > IT) as the ventral stream or the "what pathway", distinguished from the dorsal stream ("where pathway") that is thought to analyze motion, among many other features.

Subjectivity of color perception
See also: Linguistic relativity and the color naming debate

Nothing categorically distinguishes the visible spectrum of electromagnetic radiation from invisible portions of the broader spectrum. In this sense, color is not a property of electromagnetic radiation, but a feature of visual perception by an observer. Furthermore, there is an arbitrary mapping between wavelengths of light in the visual spectrum and human experiences of color. Although most people are assumed to have the same mapping, the philosopher John Locke recognized that alternatives are possible, and described one such hypothetical case with the "inverted spectrum" thought experiment. For example, someone with an inverted spectrum might experience green while seeing 'red' (700 nm) light, and experience red while seeing 'green' (530 nm) light. Synesthesia (or ideasthesia) provides some atypical but illuminating examples of subjective color experience triggered by input that is not even light, such as sounds or shapes. The possibility of a clean dissociation between color experience from properties of the world reveals that color is a subjective psychological phenomenon.

The Himba people have been found to categorize colors differently from most Westerners and are able to easily distinguish close shades of green, barely discernible for most people.[26] The Himba have created a very different color scheme which divides the spectrum to dark shades (zuzu in Himba), very light (vapa), vivid blue and green (buru) and dry colors as an adaptation to their specific way of life.

Perception of color depends heavily on the context in which the perceived object is presented. For example, a white page under blue, pink, or purple light will reflect mostly blue, pink, or purple light to the eye, respectively; the brain, however, compensates for the effect of lighting (based on the color shift of surrounding objects) and is more likely to interpret the page as white under all three conditions, a phenomenon known as color constancy.

In other animal species

Many species can see light with frequencies outside the human "visible spectrum". Bees and many other insects can detect ultraviolet light, which helps them to find nectar in flowers. Plant species that depend on insect pollination may owe reproductive success to ultraviolet "colors" and patterns rather than how colorful they appear to humans. Birds, too, can see into the ultraviolet (300–400 nm), and some have sex-dependent markings on their plumage that are visible only in the ultraviolet range.[27][28] Many animals that can see into the ultraviolet range, however, cannot see red light or any other reddish wavelengths. For example, bees' visible spectrum ends at about 590 nm, just before the orange wavelengths start. Birds, however, can see some red wavelengths, although not as far into the light spectrum as humans.[29] It is a myth that the common goldfish is the only animal that can see both infrared and ultraviolet light;[30] their color vision extends into the ultraviolet but not the infrared.[31]

The basis for this variation is the number of cone types that differ between species. Mammals in general have color vision of a limited type, and usually have red-green color blindness, with only two types of cones. Humans, some primates, and some marsupials see an extended range of colors, but only by comparison with other mammals. Most non-mammalian vertebrate species distinguish different colors at least as well as humans, and many species of birds, fish, reptiles and amphibians, and some invertebrates, have more than three cone types and probably superior color vision to humans.

In most Catarrhini (Old World monkeys and apes—primates closely related to humans) there are three types of color receptors (known as cone cells), resulting in trichromatic color vision. These primates, like humans, are known as trichromats. Many other primates (including New World monkeys) and other mammals are dichromats, which is the general color vision state for mammals that are active during the day (i.e., felines, canines, ungulates). Nocturnal mammals may have little or no color vision. Trichromat non-primate mammals are rare.[32][33]

Many invertebrates have color vision. Honeybees and bumblebees have trichromatic color vision which is insensitive to red but sensitive to ultraviolet. Osmia rufa, for example, possess a trichromatic color system, which they use in foraging for pollen from flowers.[34] In view of the importance of color vision to bees one might expect these receptor sensitivities to reflect their specific visual ecology; for example the types of flowers that they visit. However, the main groups of hymenopteran insects excluding ants (i.e., bees, wasps and sawflies) mostly have three types of photoreceptor, with spectral sensitivities similar to the honeybee's.[35] Papilio butterflies possess six types of photoreceptors and may have pentachromatic vision.[36] The most complex color vision system in the animal kingdom has been found in stomatopods (such as the mantis shrimp) having between 12 and 16 spectral receptor types thought to work as multiple dichromatic units.[37]

Vertebrate animals such as tropical fish and birds sometimes have more complex color vision systems than humans; thus the many subtle colors they exhibit generally serve as direct signals for other fish or birds, and not to signal mammals.[38] In bird vision, tetrachromacy is achieved through up to four cone types, depending on species. Each single cone contains one of the four main types of vertebrate cone photopigment (LWS/ MWS, RH2, SWS2 and SWS1) and has a colored oil droplet in its inner segment.[35] Brightly colored oil droplets inside the cones shift or narrow the spectral sensitivity of the cell. It has been suggested that it is likely that pigeons are pentachromats.[39]

Reptiles and amphibians also have four cone types (occasionally five), and probably see at least the same number of colors that humans do, or perhaps more. In addition, some nocturnal geckos and frogs have the capability of seeing color in dim light.[40][41] At least some color-guided behaviors in amphibians have also been shown to be wholly innate, developing even in visually-deprived animals.[42]

In the evolution of mammals, segments of color vision were lost, then for a few species of primates, regained by gene duplication. Eutherian mammals other than primates (for example, dogs, mammalian farm animals) generally have less-effective two-receptor (dichromatic) color perception systems, which distinguish blue, green, and yellow—but cannot distinguish oranges and reds. There is some evidence that a few mammals, such as cats, have redeveloped the ability to distinguish longer wavelength colors, in at least a limited way, via one-amino-acid mutations in opsin genes.[43] The adaptation to see reds is particularly important for primate mammals, since it leads to identification of fruits, and also newly sprouting reddish leaves, which are particularly nutritious.

However, even among primates, full color vision differs between New World and Old World monkeys. Old World primates, including monkeys and all apes, have vision similar to humans. New World monkeys may or may not have color sensitivity at this level: in most species, males are dichromats, and about 60% of females are trichromats, but the owl monkeys are cone monochromats, and both sexes of howler monkeys are trichromats.[44][45][46][47] Visual sensitivity differences between males and females in a single species is due to the gene for yellow-green sensitive opsin protein (which confers ability to differentiate red from green) residing on the X sex chromosome.

Several marsupials such as the fat-tailed dunnart (Sminthopsis crassicaudata) have been shown to have trichromatic color vision.[48]

Marine mammals, adapted for low-light vision, have only a single cone type and are thus monochromats.

Color vision table
State Types of cone cells Approx. number of colors perceived Carriers
Monochromacy1200 Marine mammals, owl monkey, Australian sea lion, achromat primates
Dichromacy240,000 Most terrestrial non-primate mammals, color blind primates
Trichromacy310 million[49] Most primates, especially great apes (such as humans), marsupials, some insects (such as honeybees)
Tetrachromacy4100 million Most reptiles, amphibians, birds and insects, rarely humans
Pentachromacy510 billion Some insects (specific species of butterflies), some birds (pigeons for instance)

Evolution
Main article: Evolution of color vision

Color perception mechanisms are highly dependent on evolutionary factors, of which the most prominent is thought to be satisfactory recognition of food sources. In herbivorous primates, color perception is essential for finding proper (immature) leaves. In hummingbirds, particular flower types are often recognized by color as well. On the other hand, nocturnal mammals have less-developed color vision, since adequate light is needed for cones to function properly. There is evidence that ultraviolet light plays a part in color perception in many branches of the animal kingdom, especially insects. In general, the optical spectrum encompasses the most common electronic transitions in matter and is therefore the most useful for collecting information about the environment.

The evolution of trichromatic color vision in primates occurred as the ancestors of modern monkeys, apes, and humans switched to diurnal (daytime) activity and began consuming fruits and leaves from flowering plants.[50] Color vision, with UV discrimination, is also present in a number of arthropods—the only terrestrial animals besides the vertebrates to possess this trait.[51]

Some animals can distinguish colors in the ultraviolet spectrum. The UV spectrum falls outside the human visible range, except for some cataract surgery patients.[52] Birds, turtles, lizards, many fish and some rodents have UV receptors in their retinas.[53] These animals can see the UV patterns found on flowers and other wildlife that are otherwise invisible to the human eye.

Ultraviolet vision is an especially important adaptation in birds. It allows birds to spot small prey from a distance, navigate, avoid predators, and forage while flying at high speeds. Birds also utilize their broad spectrum vision to recognize other birds, and in sexual selection.[54][55]

Mathematics of color perception

A "physical color" is a combination of pure spectral colors (in the visible range). In principle there exist infinitely many distinct spectral colors, and so the set of all physical colors may be thought of as an infinite-dimensional vector space (a Hilbert space). This space is typically notated Hcolor. More technically, the space of physical colors may be considered to be the topological cone over the simplex whose vertices are the spectral colors, with white at the centroid of the simplex, black at the apex of the cone, and the monochromatic color associated with any given vertex somewhere along the line from that vertex to the apex depending on its brightness.

An element C of Hcolor is a function from the range of visible wavelengths—considered as an interval of real numbers [Wmin,Wmax]—to the real numbers, assigning to each wavelength w in [Wmin,Wmax] its intensity C(w).

A humanly perceived color may be modeled as three numbers: the extents to which each of the 3 types of cones is stimulated. Thus a humanly perceived color may be thought of as a point in 3-dimensional Euclidean space. We call this space R3color.

Since each wavelength w stimulates each of the 3 types of cone cells to a known extent, these extents may be represented by 3 functions s(w), m(w), l(w) corresponding to the response of the S, M, and L cone cells, respectively.

Finally, since a beam of light can be composed of many different wavelengths, to determine the extent to which a physical color C in Hcolor stimulates each cone cell, we must calculate the integral (with respect to w), over the interval [Wmin,Wmax], of C(w)·s(w), of C(w)·m(w), and of C(w)·l(w). The triple of resulting numbers associates with each physical color C (which is an element in Hcolor) a particular perceived color (which is a single point in R3color). This association is easily seen to be linear. It may also easily be seen that many different elements in the "physical" space Hcolor can all result in the same single perceived color in R3color, so a perceived color is not unique to one physical color.

Thus human color perception is determined by a specific, non-unique linear mapping from the infinite-dimensional Hilbert space Hcolor to the 3-dimensional Euclidean space R3color.

Technically, the image of the (mathematical) cone over the simplex whose vertices are the spectral colors, by this linear mapping, is also a (mathematical) cone in R3color. Moving directly away from the vertex of this cone represents maintaining the same chromaticity while increasing its intensity. Taking a cross-section of this cone yields a 2D chromaticity space. Both the 3D cone and its projection or cross-section are convex sets; that is, any mixture of spectral colors is also a color.

The CIE 1931 xy chromaticity diagram with a triangle showing the gamut of the sRGB color space. The Planckian locus is shown with color temperatures labeled in kelvins. The outer curved boundary is the spectral (or monochromatic) locus, with wavelengths shown in nanometers (blue). Note that the colors in this file are being specified using sRGB. Areas outside the triangle cannot be accurately rendered because they are out of the gamut of sRGB, therefore they have been interpreted. Note that the colors depicted depend on the color space of the device you use to view the image (number of colors on your monitor, etc.), and may not be a strictly accurate representation of the color at a particular position.

In practice, it would be quite difficult to physiologically measure an individual's three cone responses to various physical color stimuli. Instead, a psychophysical approach is taken. Three specific benchmark test lights are typically used; let us call them S, M, and L. To calibrate human perceptual space, scientists allowed human subjects to try to match any physical color by turning dials to create specific combinations of intensities (IS, IM, IL) for the S, M, and L lights, resp., until a match was found. This needed only to be done for physical colors that are spectral, since a linear combination of spectral colors will be matched by the same linear combination of their (IS, IM, IL) matches. Note that in practice, often at least one of S, M, L would have to be added with some intensity to the physical test color, and that combination matched by a linear combination of the remaining 2 lights. Across different individuals (without color blindness), the matchings turned out to be nearly identical.

By considering all the resulting combinations of intensities (IS, IM, IL) as a subset of 3-space, a model for human perceptual color space is formed. (Note that when one of S, M, L had to be added to the test color, its intensity was counted as negative.) Again, this turns out to be a (mathematical) cone, not a quadric, but rather all rays through the origin in 3-space passing through a certain convex set. Again, this cone has the property that moving directly away from the origin corresponds to increasing the intensity of the S, M, L lights proportionately. Again, a cross-section of this cone is a planar shape that is (by definition) the space of "chromaticities" (informally: distinct colors); one particular such cross section, corresponding to constant X+Y+Z of the CIE 1931 color space, gives the CIE chromaticity diagram.

This system implies that for any hue or non-spectral color not on the boundary of the chromaticity diagram, there are infinitely many distinct physical spectra that are all perceived as that hue or color. So, in general there is no such thing as the combination of spectral colors that we perceive as (say) a specific version of tan; instead there are infinitely many possibilities that produce that exact color. The boundary colors that are pure spectral colors can be perceived only in response to light that is purely at the associated wavelength, while the boundary colors on the "line of purples" can each only be generated by a specific ratio of the pure violet and the pure red at the ends of the visible spectral colors.

The CIE chromaticity diagram is horseshoe-shaped, with its curved edge corresponding to all spectral colors (the spectral locus), and the remaining straight edge corresponding to the most saturated purples, mixtures of red and violet.

Chromatic adaptation
Main article: Chromatic adaptation

In color science, chromatic adaptation is the estimation of the representation of an object under a different light source from the one in which it was recorded. A common application is to find a chromatic adaptation transform (CAT) that will make the recording of a neutral object appear neutral (color balance), while keeping other colors also looking realistic.[56] For example, chromatic adaptation transforms are used when converting images between ICC profiles with different white points. Adobe Photoshop, for example, uses the Bradford CAT.[57]

In color vision, chromatic adaptation refers to color constancy; the ability of the visual system to preserve the appearance of an object under a wide range of light sources.[58]

gollark: Wait, is that *my* blog post?
gollark: Apparently it uses 100% CPU when none are connected, somehow.
gollark: What an exciting session of HBMud.
gollark: ```< ======================= hbmud=======================welcome to hbmud (< 0 users)what is your name?> bee> look< there is a wall next to you.there is a sandbag herethere is also a sign here.there is also a poster posted on the wallto the north is a room< present in this room are: bee> f< what?> look< there is a wall next to you.there is a sandbag herethere is also a sign here.there is also a poster posted on the wallto the north is a room< present in this room are: bee> north> look< you feel that this room is bee.there is a sign herethere is another sandbag here. you feel like you could attack itto the south is a room< present in this room are: bee< also, a(n)< bee< also, a(n)< sandbagalso, a(n) death> kill death< you are attacked by the< deathyou attack the death dealing 3 damageyou are dead. goodbye```
gollark: The Go program is no longer invoking the bee gods much.

See also

References
  1. Vorobyev, Misha (July 2004). "Ecology and evolution of primate colour vision". Clinical and Experimental Optometry. 87 (4–5): 230–238. doi:10.1111/j.1444-0938.2004.tb05053.x. PMID 15312027.
  2. Carvalho, Livia S.; Pessoa, Daniel M. A.; Mountford, Jessica K.; Davies, Wayne I. L.; Hunt, David M. (26 April 2017). "The Genetic and Evolutionary Drives behind Primate Color Vision". Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 5. doi:10.3389/fevo.2017.00034.
  3. Hiramatsu, Chihiro; Melin, Amanda D.; Allen, William L.; Dubuc, Constance; Higham, James P. (14 June 2017). "Experimental evidence that primate trichromacy is well suited for detecting primate social colour signals". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 284 (1856): 20162458. doi:10.1098/rspb.2016.2458. PMC 5474062. PMID 28615496.
  4. "Eye, human." Encyclopædia Britannica 2006 Ultimate Reference Suite DVD, 2009.
  5. Nathans, Jeremy; Thomas, Darcy; Hogness, David S. (April 11, 1986). "Molecular Genetics of Human Color Vision: The Genes Encoding Blue, Green, and Red Pigments". Science. 232 (4747): 193–202. Bibcode:1986Sci...232..193N. doi:10.1126/science.2937147. JSTOR 169687. PMID 2937147. S2CID 34321827.
  6. Neitz J, Jacobs GH (1986). "Polymorphism of the long-wavelength cone in normal human color vision". Nature. 323 (6089): 623–5. Bibcode:1986Natur.323..623N. doi:10.1038/323623a0. PMID 3773989.
  7. Jacobs GH (January 1996). "Primate photopigments and primate color vision". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93 (2): 577–81. Bibcode:1996PNAS...93..577J. doi:10.1073/pnas.93.2.577. PMC 40094. PMID 8570598.
  8. Hering, Ewald (1872). "Zur Lehre vom Lichtsinne". Sitzungsberichte der Mathematisch–Naturwissenschaftliche Classe der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften. K.-K. Hof- und Staatsdruckerei in Commission bei C. Gerold's Sohn. LXVI. Band (III Abtheilung).
  9. Ali, M.A. & Klyne, M.A. (1985), p.168
  10. Wyszecki, Günther; Stiles, W.S. (1982). Color Science: Concepts and Methods, Quantitative Data and Formulae (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley Series in Pure and Applied Optics. ISBN 978-0-471-02106-3.
  11. R. W. G. Hunt (2004). The Reproduction of Colour (6th ed.). Chichester UK: Wiley–IS&T Series in Imaging Science and Technology. pp. 11–2. ISBN 978-0-470-02425-6.
  12. Verrelli BC, Tishkoff SA (September 2004). "Signatures of Selection and Gene Conversion Associated with Human Color Vision Variation". Am. J. Hum. Genet. 75 (3): 363–75. doi:10.1086/423287. PMC 1182016. PMID 15252758.
  13. Roth, Mark (2006). "Some women may see 100 million colors, thanks to their genes" Archived 2006-11-08 at the Wayback Machine Post-Gazette.com
  14. R.W. Rodieck, "The First Steps in Seeing". Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA, 1998.
  15. Hendry, Stewart H. C.; Reid, R. Clay (1970-01-01). "SH Hendry, RC Reid, "The Koniocellular Pathway in Primate Vision". Annual Reviews Neuroscience, 2000, vol. 23, pp. 127-53". Annual Review of Neuroscience. 23: 127–53. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.127. PMID 10845061.
  16. Nigel W. Daw (17 November 1967). "Goldfish Retina: Organization for Simultaneous Color Contrast". Science. 158 (3803): 942–4. Bibcode:1967Sci...158..942D. doi:10.1126/science.158.3803.942. PMID 6054169.
  17. Bevil R. Conway (2002). Neural Mechanisms of Color Vision: Double-Opponent Cells in the Visual Cortex. Springer. ISBN 978-1-4020-7092-1.
  18. Conway BR (15 April 2001). "Spatial structure of cone inputs to color cells in alert macaque primary visual cortex (V-1)". J. Neurosci. 21 (8): 2768–83. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-08-02768.2001. PMC 6762533. PMID 11306629.
  19. John E. Dowling (2001). Neurons and Networks: An Introduction to Behavioral Neuroscience. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-00462-7.
  20. McCann, M., ed. 1993. Edwin H. Land's Essays. Springfield, Va.: Society for Imaging Science and Technology.
  21. Judd, Deane B.; Wyszecki, Günter (1975). Color in Business, Science and Industry. Wiley Series in Pure and Applied Optics (third ed.). New York: Wiley-Interscience. p. 388. ISBN 978-0-471-45212-6.
  22. Conway BR, Moeller S, Tsao DY (2007). "Specialized color modules in macaque extrastriate cortex". Neuron. 56 (3): 560–73. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.008. PMID 17988638.
  23. Conway BR, Tsao DY (2009). "Color-tuned neurons are spatially clustered according to color preference within alert macaque posterior inferior temporal cortex". Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 106 (42): 18035–18039. Bibcode:2009PNAS..10618034C. doi:10.1073/pnas.0810943106. PMC 2764907. PMID 19805195.
  24. John Allman; Steven W. Zucker (1993). "On cytochrome oxidase blobs in visual cortex". In Laurence Harris; Michael Jenkin (eds.). Spatial Vision in Humans and Robots: The Proceedings of the 1991 York Conference. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-43071-5.
  25. Zeki S (2005). "The Ferrier Lecture 1995 Behind the Seen: The functional specialization of the brain in space and time". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 360 (1458): 1145–1183. doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1666. PMC 1609195. PMID 16147515.
  26. Roberson, Davidoff, Davies & Shapiro. referred by Debi Roberson, University of Essex 2011
  27. Cuthill, Innes C (1997). "Ultraviolet vision in birds". In Peter J.B. Slater (ed.). Advances in the Study of Behavior. 29. Oxford, England: Academic Press. p. 161. ISBN 978-0-12-004529-7.
  28. Jamieson, Barrie G. M. (2007). Reproductive Biology and Phylogeny of Birds. Charlottesville VA: University of Virginia. p. 128. ISBN 978-1-57808-386-2.
  29. Varela, F. J.; Palacios, A. G.; Goldsmith T. M. "Color vision of birds" in Ziegler & Bischof (1993) 77–94
  30. "True or False? "The common goldfish is the only animal that can see both infra-red and ultra-violet light." - Skeptive". Archived from the original on December 24, 2013. Retrieved September 28, 2013.
  31. Neumeyer, Christa (2012). "Chapter 2: Color Vision in Goldfish and Other Vertebrates". In Lazareva, Olga; Shimizu, Toru; Wasserman, Edward (eds.). How Animals See the World: Comparative Behavior, Biology, and Evolution of Vision. Oxford Scholarship Online. ISBN 978-0-195-33465-4.
  32. Ali, Mohamed Ather; Klyne, M.A. (1985). Vision in Vertebrates. New York: Plenum Press. pp. 174–175. ISBN 978-0-306-42065-8.
  33. Jacobs, G. H. (1993). "The Distribution and Nature of Colour Vision Among the Mammals". Biological Reviews. 68 (3): 413–471. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.1993.tb00738.x. PMID 8347768.
  34. Menzel, R.; Steinmann, E.; Souza, J. De; Backhaus, W. (1988-05-01). "Spectral Sensitivity of Photoreceptors and Colour Vision in the Solitary Bee, Osmia Rufa". Journal of Experimental Biology. 136 (1): 35–52. ISSN 0022-0949. Archived from the original on 2016-03-04.
  35. Osorio D, Vorobyev M (June 2008). "A review of the evolution of animal colour vision and visual communication signals". Vision Research. 48 (20): 2042–2051. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2008.06.018. PMID 18627773.
  36. Arikawa K (November 2003). "Spectral organization of the eye of a butterfly, Papilio". J. Comp. Physiol. A. 189 (11): 791–800. doi:10.1007/s00359-003-0454-7. PMID 14520495.
  37. Cronin TW, Marshall NJ (1989). "A retina with at least ten spectral types of photoreceptors in a mantis shrimp". Nature. 339 (6220): 137–40. Bibcode:1989Natur.339..137C. doi:10.1038/339137a0.
  38. Kelber A, Vorobyev M, Osorio D (February 2003). "Animal color vision—behavioural tests and physiological concepts" (PDF). Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 78 (1): 81–118. doi:10.1017/S1464793102005985. PMID 12620062.
  39. Introducing Comparative Colour Vision Colour Vision: A Study in Cognitive Science and the Philosophy of Perception, By Evan Thompson
  40. Roth, Lina S. V.; Lundström, Linda; Kelber, Almut; Kröger, Ronald H. H.; Unsbo, Peter (March 30, 2009). "The pupils and optical systems of gecko eyes". Journal of Vision. 9 (3:27): 27.1–11. doi:10.1167/9.3.27. PMID 19757966.
  41. Yovanovich, Carola A. M.; Koskela, Sanna M.; Nevala, Noora; Kondrashev, Sergei L.; Kelber, Almut; Donner, Kristian (April 5, 2017). "The dual rod system of amphibians supports colour discrimination at the absolute visual threshold". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 372 (1717). doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0066. PMID 28193811.
  42. Hunt, Jasper Elan; Bruno, John Rudolph; Pratt, Kara Geo (May 12, 2020). "An innate color preference displayed by Xenopus tadpoles is persistent and requires the tegmentum". Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience. 14 (71). doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2020.00071. PMID 32477078.
  43. Shozo Yokoyamaa and F. Bernhard Radlwimmera, "The Molecular Genetics of Red and Green Color Vision in Mammals", Genetics, Vol. 153, 919–932, October 1999.
  44. Jacobs G. H.; Deegan J. F. (2001). "Photopigments and color vision in New World monkeys from the family Atelidae". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 268 (1468): 695–702. doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1421. PMC 1088658. PMID 11321057.
  45. Jacobs G. H., Deegan J. F., Neitz, Neitz J., Crognale M. A. (1993). "Photopigments and color vision in the nocturnal monkey, Aotus". Vision Research. 33 (13): 1773–1783. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.568.1560. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(93)90168-V. PMID 8266633.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  46. Mollon J. D.; Bowmaker J. K.; Jacobs G. H. (1984). "Variations of color vision in a New World primate can be explained by polymorphism of retinal photopigments". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 222 (1228): 373–399. Bibcode:1984RSPSB.222..373M. doi:10.1098/rspb.1984.0071. PMID 6149558.
  47. Sternberg, Robert J. (2006): Cognitive Psychology. 4th Ed. Thomson Wadsworth.
  48. Arrese CA, Beazley LD, Neumeyer C (March 2006). "Behavioural evidence for marsupial trichromacy". Curr. Biol. 16 (6): R193–4. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.02.036. PMID 16546067.
  49. Judd, Deane B.; Wyszecki, Günter (1975). Color in Business, Science and Industry. Wiley Series in Pure and Applied Optics (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley-Interscience. p. 388. ISBN 978-0-471-45212-6.
  50. Pinker, Steven (1997). How the Mind Works. New York: Norton. p. 191. ISBN 978-0-393-04535-2.
  51. Koyanagi, M.; Nagata, T.; Katoh, K.; Yamashita, S.; Tokunaga, F. (2008). "Molecular Evolution of Arthropod Color Vision Deduced from Multiple Opsin Genes of Jumping Spiders". Journal of Molecular Evolution. 66 (2): 130–137. Bibcode:2008JMolE..66..130K. doi:10.1007/s00239-008-9065-9. PMID 18217181.
  52. David Hambling (May 30, 2002). "Let the light shine in: You don't have to come from another planet to see ultraviolet light". EducationGuardian.co.uk. Archived from the original on November 23, 2014.
  53. Jacobs GH, Neitz J, Deegan JF (1991). "Retinal receptors in rodents maximally sensitive to ultraviolet light". Nature. 353 (6345): 655–6. Bibcode:1991Natur.353..655J. doi:10.1038/353655a0. PMID 1922382.
  54. FJ Varela; AG Palacios; TM Goldsmith (1993). Bischof, Hans-Joachim; Zeigler, H. Philip (eds.). Vision, brain, and behavior in birds. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. pp. 77–94. ISBN 978-0-262-24036-9.
  55. IC Cuthill; JC Partridge; ATD Bennett; SC Church; NS Hart; S Hunt (2000). "Ultraviolet Vision in Birds". Advances in the Study of Behavior. 29. pp. 159–214.
  56. Süsstrunk, Sabine. Chromatic Adaptation Archived 2011-08-18 at the Wayback Machine
  57. Lindbloom, Bruce. Chromatic Adaptation Archived 2011-09-26 at the Wayback Machine
  58. Fairchild, Mark D. (2005). "8. Chromatic Adaptation". Color Appearance Models. Wiley. p. 146. ISBN 978-0-470-01216-1.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.