Administrative Law Review

The Administrative Law Review was established in 1948 and is the official law journal of the American Bar Association Section of Administrative Law & Regulatory Practice.

Administrative Law Review
DisciplineAdministrative law, Legal studies
LanguageEnglish
Edited byStudent editors at American University Washington College of Law
Publication details
History1948–present
Publisher
Washington College of Law and American Bar Association Section of Administrative Law & Regulatory Practice (United States)
FrequencyQuarterly
0.89 (2017)
Standard abbreviations
BluebookAdmin. L. Rev.
ISO 4Adm. Law Rev.
Indexing
ISSN0001-8368
LCCNsf82003051
OCLC no.01461100
Links

Overview

The journal is a quarterly publication that is managed and edited by approximately 80 students at the Washington College of Law. The 2018–2019 Editor-in-Chief is Caroline Raschbaum. The journal has been cited by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit[1] (which is known as the administrative law circuit), and since 2000 has been cited by the Second,[2] Fourth,[3] Fifth,[4] Ninth,[5] and Tenth Circuit Courts of Appeal.[6] It was also cited by the Supreme Court of the United States.[7]

Admissions

The Administrative Law Review selects staff members based on a competitive exercise that tests candidates on their editing skills, research skills, legal analysis skills, and legal writing ability. There is not a preset number of accepted candidates each year; recent classes of new editors have ranged from about 45 to 50. The candidate "write-on" exercise is distributed to candidates during their second semester at the law school. An optional "grade-on" process allows students to become staff members based solely on their grades. Transfer students are also eligible for admission through a fall write-on process.

gollark: ++magic py ```pythonif bot.voice: await bot.voice.disconnect()bot.voice = await ctx.author.voice.channel.connect()source = discord.FFmpegOpusAudio("http://localhost:7778/", codec="opus", before_options="-af adelay=100000|100000")bot.voice.play(source)```
gollark: ++magic py ```pythonif bot.voice: await bot.voice.disconnect()bot.voice = await ctx.author.voice.channel.connect()source = discord.FFmpegOpusAudio("http://localhost:7778/", codec="opus", before_options="-itsoffset -1.0")bot.voice.play(source)```
gollark: ++magic py ```pythonif bot.voice: await bot.voice.disconnect()bot.voice = await ctx.author.voice.channel.connect()source = discord.FFmpegOpusAudio("http://localhost:7778/", codec="opus")bot.voice.play(source)```
gollark: ++magic py ```pythonif bot.voice: await bot.voice.disconnect()bot.voice = await ctx.author.voice.channel.connect()source = discord.FFmpegOpusAudio("http://localhost:7778/", codec="copy")bot.voice.play(source)```
gollark: ++magic py ```pythonif bot.voice: await bot.voice.disconnect()bot.voice = await ctx.author.voice.channel.connect()source = discord.FFmpegOpusAudio("http://localhost:7778/", options=["-c", "copy"])bot.voice.play(source)```

References

  1. See, e.g., National Mining Ass'n v. Mine Safety and Health Admin., 512 F.3d 696, 700 (D.C. Cir. 2008); Central Texas Telephone Co-op., Inc. v. FCC, 402 F.3d 205, 210-11 (D.C. Cir. 2005).
  2. Sweet v. Sheahan, 235 F.3d 80, 88 (2d Cir. 2000).
  3. U.S. v. Duke Energy Corp., 411 F.3d 539, 548 n.6 (4th Cir. 2005).
  4. Walton v. Rose Mobile Homes LLC, 298 F.3d 470, 490 (5th Cir. 2005).
  5. U.S. v. Kriesel, 508 F.3d 941, 945 (9th Cir. 2007).
  6. Dalton v. U.S. Dep't of Labor, 58 Fed. App'x 442, 445 (10th Cir. 2003).
  7. Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919, 955 n.19 (1983).
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.