Abdication of Edward VIII

In 1936, a constitutional crisis in the British Empire arose when King-Emperor Edward VIII proposed to marry Wallis Simpson, an American socialite who was divorced from her first husband and was pursuing the divorce of her second.

"Abdication of Edward" redirects here. For the abdication of Edward II, see Parliament of 1327.

Instrument of abdication signed by Edward VIII and his three brothers, Albert, Henry and George, 10 December 1936

The marriage was opposed by the governments of the United Kingdom and the Dominions of the British Commonwealth. Religious, legal, political, and moral objections were raised. As the British monarch, Edward was the nominal head of the Church of England, which did not allow divorced people to remarry in church if their ex-spouses were still alive.[lower-alpha 1] For this reason, it was widely believed that Edward could not marry Simpson and remain on the throne. Simpson was perceived to be politically and socially unsuitable as a prospective queen consort because of her two failed marriages. It was widely assumed by the Establishment that she was driven by love of money or position rather than love for the King. Despite the opposition, Edward declared that he loved Simpson and intended to marry her as soon as her second divorce was finalised.

The widespread unwillingness to accept Simpson as the King's consort and Edward's refusal to give her up led to his abdication in December 1936.[lower-alpha 2] He was succeeded by his brother Albert, who became George VI. Edward was given the title of Duke of Windsor, and styled Royal Highness, following his abdication, and he married Simpson the following year. They remained married until his death 35 years later.

Prelude

Edward in 1932

Edward had been introduced to Wallis Simpson, an American citizen and wife of British shipping executive Ernest Aldrich Simpson, by Lady Furness on 10 January 1931. Ernest Simpson was Wallis's second husband; her first marriage, to U.S. Navy pilot Win Spencer, had ended in divorce in 1927. It is generally accepted that Wallis Simpson and the Prince of Wales became lovers in 1934, while Lady Furness (who was also in a relationship with the prince) was visiting relatives in the United States. However, Edward adamantly insisted to his father that he was not physically intimate with Simpson and that it was inappropriate to describe her as his mistress.[3] Edward's relationship with Simpson further weakened his poor relationship with his parents. Although King George V and Queen Mary met Simpson at Buckingham Palace in 1935,[4] they later refused to receive her.[5] Edward and Simpson were secretly followed by members of the Metropolitan Police Special Branch, who produced reports on the nature of their relationship and their investigations into Wallis Simpson's private life that included the "pursuit of vicious gossip" and the identification of a "secret lover".[6] The prospect of having an American divorcee with a questionable past having such sway over the heir apparent led to anxiety among government and establishment figures.[7]

Edward VIII succeeded his father on 20 January 1936, after which Simpson attended more official functions as the King's guest. Despite her name appearing regularly in the Court Circular, the name of her husband was conspicuously absent.[8] In the summer of that year, the King eschewed the traditional prolonged stay at Balmoral in favour of a holiday with Simpson in the eastern Mediterranean that was widely covered in the American and continental European press, but not by the British press, which maintained a self-imposed silence. Nevertheless, Canadians and expatriate Britons, who had access to the foreign reports, were largely scandalised by the coverage.[9]

Edward VIII and Wallis Simpson in the Mediterranean, 1936

By October, it was rumoured in high society and abroad that Edward intended to marry Simpson as soon as she was free to do so.[10] At the end of that month, the crisis came to a head when she filed for divorce and the American press announced that marriage between her and the King was imminent.[11] The King's private secretary, Alec Hardinge, wrote to him on 13 November, warning: "The silence in the British Press on the subject of Your Majesty's friendship with Mrs Simpson is not going to be maintained ... Judging by the letters from British subjects living in foreign countries where the Press has been outspoken, the effect will be calamitous."[12] Senior British ministers knew that Hardinge had written to the King and may have helped him draft the letter.[13]

The King invited Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin to Buckingham Palace the following Monday (16 November) and informed him that he intended to marry Simpson. Baldwin replied that such a marriage would not be acceptable to the people, stating: "... the Queen becomes the Queen of the country. Therefore in the choice of a Queen the voice of the people must be heard".[14] Baldwin's view was shared by the Australian High Commissioner in London, Stanley Bruce, who was also a former Prime Minister of Australia. On the same day that Hardinge wrote to the King, Bruce met Hardinge and then wrote to Baldwin, expressing horror at the idea of a marriage between the King and Simpson.[15]

Nevertheless, the British press remained quiet on the subject until Alfred Blunt, Bishop of Bradford, gave a speech to his diocesan conference on 1 December, which alluded to the King's need of divine grace: "We hope that he is aware of his need. Some of us wish that he gave more positive signs of his awareness."[16] The press took this for the first public comment by a notable person on the crisis and it became front-page news the following day. When asked about it later, however, the bishop claimed he had not heard of Simpson at the time he wrote the speech.[17] Acting on the advice of Edward's staff, Simpson left Britain for the south of France two days later in an attempt to escape intense press attention. Both she and the King were devastated by the separation. At a tearful departure, the King told her, "I shall never give you up."[18]

Opposition

Opposition to the King and his marriage came from several directions. Edward's desire to modernise the monarchy and make it more accessible, though appreciated by many of the public,[19] was distrusted by the British Establishment.[20] Edward upset the aristocracy by treating their traditions and ceremonies with disdain, and many were offended by his abandonment of accepted social norms and mores.[21]

Social and moral

Wallis Simpson, 1936

Government ministers and the royal family found Wallis Simpson's background and behaviour unacceptable for a potential queen. Rumours and innuendo about her circulated in society.[22] The King's mother, Queen Mary, was even told that Simpson might have held some sort of sexual control over Edward, as she had released him from an undefined sexual dysfunction through practices learnt in a Chinese brothel.[23] This view was partially shared by Alan Don, Chaplain to the Archbishop of Canterbury, who wrote that he suspected the King "is sexually abnormal which may account for the hold Mrs S. has over him".[24] Even Edward VIII's official biographer, Philip Ziegler, noted that: "There must have been some sort of sadomasochistic relationship ... [Edward] relished the contempt and bullying she bestowed on him."[25]

Police detectives following Simpson reported back that, while involved with Edward, she was also involved with a married car mechanic and salesman named Guy Trundle.[26] This may well have been passed on to senior figures in the establishment, including members of the royal family.[27] Joseph Kennedy, the American ambassador, described her as a "tart", and his wife, Rose, refused to dine with her.[28]

Wallis was perceived to be pursuing Edward for his money; his equerry wrote that she would eventually leave him, "having secured the cash".[29] The future prime minister Neville Chamberlain (then Chancellor of the Exchequer) wrote in his diary that she was "an entirely unscrupulous woman who is not in love with the King but is exploiting him for her own purposes. She has already ruined him in money and jewels ..."[30]

Relations between the United Kingdom and the United States were strained during the inter-war years and the majority of Britons were reluctant to accept an American as queen consort.[31] At the time, some members of the British upper class looked down on Americans with disdain and considered them socially inferior.[32] In contrast, the American public was clearly in favour of the marriage,[33] as was most of the American press.[34]

Religious and legal

In Edward's lifetime, the Church of England disapproved of divorced people remarrying in church while a former spouse was still living. The monarch was required to be in communion with the Church of England, and was its nominal head or Supreme Governor. In 1935 the Church of England reaffirmed that, "in no circumstances can Christian men or women re-marry during the lifetime of a wife or a husband".[35] The Archbishop of Canterbury, Cosmo Lang, held that the King, as the head of the Church of England, could not marry a divorcée.[36]

If Edward married Wallis Simpson, a divorcee who would soon have two living ex-husbands, in a civil ceremony, it would directly conflict with Church teaching and his role as the Church's ex officio head.[37][lower-alpha 3]

Wallis's first divorce (in the United States on the grounds of "emotional incompatibility") was not recognised by the Church of England and, if challenged in the English courts, might not have been recognised under English law. At that time, the Church and English law considered adultery to be the only grounds for divorce. Consequently, under this argument, her second marriage, as well as her marriage to Edward, would be considered bigamous and invalid.[41]

Political

Fort Belvedere, Surrey, Edward's residence in Windsor Great Park

When Edward visited depressed mining villages in Wales, his comment that "something must be done"[42] led to concerns among elected politicians that he would interfere in political matters, traditionally avoided by constitutional monarchs. Ramsay MacDonald, Lord President of the Council, wrote of the King's comments: "These escapades should be limited. They are an invasion into the field of politics and should be watched constitutionally."[43] Although Edward's comments had made him popular in Wales,[44] he became extremely unpopular with the public in Scotland following his refusal to open a new wing of Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, saying he could not do so because he was in mourning for his father. The day after the opening, he was pictured in newspapers on holiday: he had turned down the public event in favour of meeting Simpson.[45]

As Prince of Wales, Edward had publicly referred to Labour county councillors as "cranks"[46] and made speeches counter to government policy.[47] During his reign as king, his refusal to accept the advice of ministers continued: he opposed the imposition of sanctions on Italy after its invasion of Ethiopia, refused to receive the deposed Emperor of Ethiopia, and would not support a strengthening of the League of Nations.[48]

Members of the British government became further dismayed by the proposed marriage after being told that Wallis Simpson was an agent of Nazi Germany. The Foreign Office obtained leaked dispatches from the German Reich's Ambassador to the United Kingdom, Joachim von Ribbentrop, which revealed his strong view that opposition to the marriage was motivated by the wish "to defeat those Germanophile forces which had been working through Mrs Simpson".[49] It was rumoured that Simpson had access to confidential government papers sent to Edward, which he left unguarded at his Fort Belvedere residence.[50] While Edward was abdicating, the personal protection officers guarding Simpson in exile in France sent reports to Downing Street suggesting that she might "flit to Germany".[51]

Options considered

As a result of these rumours and arguments, the belief strengthened among the British establishment that Simpson could not become a royal consort. British Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin explicitly advised Edward that the majority of people would be opposed to his marrying Simpson, indicating that if he did, in direct contravention of his ministers' advice, the government would resign en masse. The King responded, according to his own account later: "I intend to marry Mrs Simpson as soon as she is free to marry ... if the Government opposed the marriage, as the Prime Minister had given me reason to believe it would, then I was prepared to go."[52] Under pressure from the King, and "startled"[52] at the suggested abdication, Baldwin agreed to take further soundings on three options:

1. Edward and Simpson marry and she become queen (a royal marriage);
2. Edward and Simpson marry, but she not become queen, instead receiving some courtesy title (a morganatic marriage); or
3. Abdication for Edward and any potential heirs he might father, allowing him to make any marital decisions without further constitutional implications.

Canadian Prime Minister William Lyon Mackenzie King (left) and his British counterpart Stanley Baldwin (right), 1926

The second option had European precedents, including Edward's own great-grandfather, Duke Alexander of Württemberg, but it had no parallel in British constitutional history. The prime ministers of the five Dominions (Australia, Canada, New Zealand, South Africa, and the Irish Free State) were consulted, and the majority agreed that there was "no alternative to course (3)".[53] William Lyon Mackenzie King (Prime Minister of Canada), Joseph Lyons (Prime Minister of Australia), and J. B. M. Hertzog (Prime Minister of South Africa) opposed options 1 and 2. Mackenzie King told Edward to do "what he believed in his own heart was right"[54] and the Canadian government appealed to the King to put his duty before his feelings for Simpson.[2] Governor General of Canada Lord Tweedsmuir told Buckingham Palace and Baldwin that Canadians held deep affection for the King, but also that Canadian public opinion would be outraged if Edward married a divorcee.[55] Michael Joseph Savage (Prime Minister of New Zealand) rejected option 1 and thought that option 2 "might be possible ... if some solution along these lines were found to be practicable", but "would be guided by the decision of the Home government".[56] In communications with the British government, Éamon de Valera (President of the Executive Council of the Irish Free State) remarked that as a Roman Catholic country, the Irish Free State did not recognise divorce. He supposed that if the British people would not accept Wallis Simpson then abdication was the only possible solution.[57] On 24 November, Baldwin consulted the three leading opposition politicians in Britain: Leader of the Opposition Clement Attlee, Liberal leader Sir Archibald Sinclair, and Winston Churchill. Sinclair and Attlee agreed that options 1 and 2 were unacceptable, and Churchill pledged to support the government.[58]

Churchill did not support the government, however. In July, he had advised the King's legal counsel, Walter Monckton, against the divorce, but his advice was ignored.[59] As soon as the affair became public knowledge, Churchill started to pressure Baldwin and the King to delay any decisions until parliament and the people had been consulted.[60] In a private letter to Geoffrey Dawson, the editor of The Times newspaper, Churchill suggested that a delay would be beneficial because, given time, the King might fall out of love with Simpson.[61] Baldwin rejected the request for delay, presumably because he preferred to resolve the crisis quickly. Supporters of the King alleged a conspiracy between Baldwin, Geoffrey Dawson, and Cosmo Gordon Lang, the Archbishop of Canterbury.[62] The royal physician Bertrand Dawson was possibly involved in a plan to force the prime minister to retire on the grounds of heart disease, but he eventually accepted, on the evidence of an early electrocardiograph, that Baldwin's heart was sound.[63]

Political support for the King was scattered and comprised politicians alienated from the mainstream parties such as Churchill, Oswald Mosley, and the Communists.[64] David Lloyd George also supported the King despite disliking Simpson. He was, however, unable to take any active role in the crisis because he was on holiday in Jamaica with his mistress Frances Stevenson.[65] In early December, rumours circulated that the King's supporters would join together in a "King's Party", led by Churchill. However, there was no concerted effort to form an organised movement and Churchill had no intention of leading one.[66] Nevertheless, the rumours damaged the King and Churchill severely, as members of parliament were horrified at the idea of the King interfering in politics.[67]

The letters and diaries of working-class people and ex-servicemen generally demonstrate support for the King, while those from the middle and upper classes tend to express indignation and distaste.[68] The Times, The Morning Post, Daily Herald, and newspapers owned by Lord Kemsley, such as The Daily Telegraph, opposed the marriage. On the other hand, the Express and Mail, owned by Lord Beaverbrook and Lord Rothermere, respectively, appeared to support a morganatic marriage.[69] The King estimated that the newspapers in favour had a circulation of 12.5 million, and those against had 8.5 million.[70]

On 3 December, Edward had a "tense" meeting with Baldwin.[71] Backed by Churchill and Beaverbrook, Edward proposed to broadcast a speech via the BBC. The proposed text invoked the "ancient custom" for a King to "address his public utterances to his people".[71] Edward proposed to remind his listeners: "I am still the same man whose motto was 'Ich Dien', I serve."[71] In the proposed speech, Edward indicated his desire to remain on the throne or to be recalled to it if forced to abdicate, while marrying Simpson morganatically. In one section, Edward proposed to say:

Neither Mrs Simpson nor I have ever sought to insist that she should be queen. All we desired was that our married happiness should carry with it a proper title and dignity for her, befitting my wife. Now that I have at last been able to take you into my confidence, I feel it is best to go away for a while, so that you may reflect calmly and quietly, but without undue delay, on what I have said.[72]

Baldwin blocked the speech, saying that it would shock many people and would be a grave breach of constitutional principles.[71] By modern convention, the sovereign could only act with the advice and counsel of ministers. In seeking the people's support against the government, Edward was opting to oppose binding ministerial advice and instead act as a private individual. Edward's British ministers felt that, in proposing the speech, Edward had revealed his disdainful attitude towards constitutional conventions and threatened the political neutrality of the Crown.[73]

Cabinet Office files released in 2013 show that on or before 5 December 1936, the Home Secretary, Sir John Simon, had ordered the General Post Office (which controlled British telephone services) to intercept "telephone communications between Fort Belvedere and Buckingham Palace on the one hand and the continent of Europe on the other".[74]

On 5 December, having in effect been told that he could not keep the throne and marry Simpson, and having had his request to broadcast to the Empire to explain "his side of the story" blocked on constitutional grounds,[75] Edward chose the third option.[76]

Legal manoeuvres

Following Simpson's divorce hearing on 27 October 1936, her solicitor, John Theodore Goddard, became concerned that there would be a "patriotic" citizen's intervention (a legal device to block the divorce), and that such an intervention would be successful.[77] The courts could not grant a collaborative divorce (a dissolution of marriage consented to by both parties), and so the case was being handled as if it were an undefended at-fault divorce brought against Ernest Simpson, with Wallis Simpson as the innocent, injured party. The divorce action would fail if the citizen's intervention showed that the Simpsons had colluded by, for example, conniving in or staging the appearance of his adultery so that she could marry someone else. On Monday 7 December 1936, the King heard that Goddard planned to fly to the south of France to see Wallis Simpson. The King summoned him and expressly forbade him to make the journey, fearing that the visit might put doubts in Simpson's mind. Goddard went straight to Downing Street to see Baldwin, as a result of which he was provided with an aeroplane to take him directly to Cannes.[77]

Upon his arrival, Goddard warned his client that a citizen's intervention, should it arise, was likely to succeed. It was, according to Goddard, his duty to advise her to withdraw her divorce petition.[77] Simpson refused, but they both telephoned the King to inform him that she was willing to give him up so that he could remain king. It was, however, too late; the King had already made up his mind to go, even if he could not marry Simpson. Indeed, as the belief that the abdication was inevitable gathered strength, Goddard stated that: "[his] client was ready to do anything to ease the situation but the other end of the wicket [Edward VIII] was determined".[78]

Goddard had a weak heart and had never flown before, so he asked his doctor, William Kirkwood, to accompany him on the trip. As Kirkwood was a resident at a maternity hospital, his presence led to false speculation that Simpson was pregnant,[79] and even that she was having an abortion. The press excitedly reported that the solicitor had flown to Simpson accompanied by a gynaecologist and an anaesthetist (who was actually the lawyer's clerk).[80]

Abdication

"The Year of the Three Kings", postcard 1936

Abdication statement of Edward VIII

At Fort Belvedere, on 10 December, Edward signed his written abdication notices,[lower-alpha 4] witnessed by his three younger brothers: Prince Albert, Duke of York (who succeeded Edward as George VI); Prince Henry, Duke of Gloucester; and Prince George, Duke of Kent. The following day, it was given effect by Act of Parliament: His Majesty's Declaration of Abdication Act 1936.[82] Under changes introduced in 1931 by the Statute of Westminster, a single Crown for the entire empire had been replaced by multiple crowns, one for each Dominion, worn by a single monarch in an organisation then known as the British Commonwealth.[2] Though the British government, hoping for expediency and to avoid embarrassment, wished the Dominions to accept the actions of the "home" government, the Dominions held that Edward's abdication required the consent of each Commonwealth state.[83] Under the Statute of Westminster, the act passed by the UK parliament could become law in other Dominions at their request. This was duly given by the Parliament of Australia, which was at the time in session, and by the governments of Canada, South Africa, and New Zealand, whose parliaments were in recess.[2] The government of the Irish Free State, taking the opportunity presented by the crisis and in a major step towards its eventual transition to a republic, passed an amendment to its constitution on 11 December to remove references to the Crown and abolish the office of Governor-General of the Irish Free State;[84] the King's abdication was recognised a day later in the External Relations Act.[85] In South Africa, His Majesty King Edward the Eighth's Abdication Act 1937 declared that the abdication took effect there on 10 December.[2] Canada passed the Succession to the Throne Act 1937 to symbolically confirm the abdication.[2]

Edward's supporters felt that he had "been hounded from the throne by that arch humbug Baldwin",[86] but many members of the establishment were relieved by Edward's departure. Mackenzie King wrote in his diary on 8 December 1936 that Edward's "sense of right or wrong has been largely obliterated by the jazz of life he has led for years"[54] and, upon receiving news of Edward's final decision to abdicate, "if that is the kind of man he is it is better he should not be longer on the Throne."[87] Edward's own Assistant Private Secretary, Alan Lascelles, had told Baldwin as early as 1927: "I can't help thinking that the best thing that could happen to him, and to the country, would be for him to break his neck."[88]

On 11 December 1936, Edward made a BBC radio broadcast from Windsor Castle; having abdicated, he was introduced by Sir John Reith as "His Royal Highness Prince Edward".[89][90] The official address had been polished by Churchill and was moderate in tone, speaking about Edward's inability to do his job "as I would have wished" without the support of "the woman I love".[91] Edward's reign had lasted 327 days, the shortest of any British monarch since the disputed reign of Lady Jane Grey over 380 years earlier. The day following the broadcast he left Britain for Austria.[92]

Post-abdication

The Duke of Windsor, formerly Edward VIII, 1945

George VI granted his elder brother the title of Duke of Windsor with the style His Royal Highness on 12 December 1936.[93] On 3 May the following year, the Simpsons' divorce was made final. The case was handled quietly and it barely featured in some newspapers. The Times printed a single sentence below a separate, and seemingly unconnected, report announcing the Duke's departure from Austria.[94]

Edward married Wallis in France on 3 June 1937. She became the Duchess of Windsor, but, much to Edward's disgust, George VI issued letters patent that denied her the style of Her Royal Highness.[95] The couple settled in France, and the Duke received a tax-free allowance from his brother, which Edward supplemented by writing his memoirs and by illegal currency trading.[96] He also profited from the sale of Balmoral Castle and Sandringham House to George VI. Both estates are private property and not part of the Royal Estate, and were therefore inherited and owned by Edward, regardless of the abdication.[97]

In October 1937, the Duke and Duchess visited Germany, against the advice of the British government, and met Hitler at his Obersalzberg retreat. The visit was much publicised by the German media. During the visit the Duke gave full Nazi salutes.[98] In an article for the New York Daily News and Chicago Tribune of 13 December 1966 the Duke wrote that in 1937 Hitler persuaded him "it was in Britain's interest and in Europe's too, that Germany be encouraged to strike east and smash Communism forever ... I thought the rest of us could be fence-sitters while the Nazis and the Reds slogged it out."[99]

After the outbreak of World War II in September 1939, Edward was assigned to the British Military Mission in France.[100] In February 1940, the German ambassador in The Hague, Count Julius von Zech-Burkersroda, claimed that Edward had leaked the Allied war plans for the defence of Belgium.[101] When Germany invaded the north of France in May 1940, the Duke and Duchess fled to Lisbon.[102]

Under the code name Operation Willi, Nazi agents, principally Walter Schellenberg, plotted unsuccessfully to persuade the Duke to leave Portugal, and contemplated kidnapping him.[103] Lord Caldecote warned Churchill that the Duke "is well-known to be pro-Nazi and he may become a centre of intrigue".[104] Churchill threatened the Duke with a court-martial if he did not return to British soil.[105]

In July 1940, Edward was appointed Governor of the Bahamas.[106] Edward reportedly told an acquaintance, "After the war is over and Hitler will crush the Americans ... we'll take over ... They [the British] don't want me as their king, but I'll be back as their leader."[107] He was reported as saying that "it would be a tragic thing for the world if Hitler was overthrown".[107] Comments like these reinforced the belief that the Duke and Duchess held Nazi sympathies and the effect of the abdication crisis of 1936 was to force off the throne a man with extreme political opinions.[108] Claims that Edward would have been a threat or that he was removed by a political conspiracy to dethrone him remain speculative and "persist largely because since 1936 the contemporary public considerations have lost most of their force and so seem, wrongly, to provide insufficient explanation for the King's departure".[109]

Notes

1. In 2002, the Church of England decided to allow divorced people to remarry in church under certain conditions.[1]
2. The instrument of abdication was signed on 10 December, and given legislative form by His Majesty's Declaration of Abdication Act 1936 the following day. The parliament of the Union of South Africa retroactively approved the abdication with effect from 10 December, and the Irish Free State recognised the abdication on 12 December.[2]
3. Although Henry VIII famously separated the Church of England from Rome in order to end his first marriage, he never actually divorced; his marriages were annulled.[38] Three of his six marriages were annulled, i.e. declared under canon law to be null and void. His marriage to Catherine of Aragon was annulled on the grounds that it was incestuous (Catherine had been married previously to Henry's elder brother). Henry's marriage to Anne Boleyn was declared invalid after her conviction for treason. His marriage to Anne of Cleves was not consummated and was annulled six months after the wedding on the pretext that Anne had been promised to another.[39] A divorce is the dissolution of a valid marriage, whereas an annulment recognises that the marriage was invalid and never existed. A person with an annulment has not been married, whereas a person with a divorce has been married already.[40]
4. There were 15, including one for each Dominion, India, the British House of Commons, the House of Lords, and the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom.[81]

Sources

1. Divorce in Christianity, BBC, 23 June 2009
2. Heard, Andrew (1990), Canadian Independence, Vancouver: Simon Fraser University, retrieved 6 May 2009
3. Ziegler, p. 233
4. Windsor, p. 255
5. Bradford, p. 142
6. Bowcott, Owen; Bates, Stephen (30 January 2003), "Car dealer was Wallis Simpson's secret lover", The Guardian, London, retrieved 1 May 2010
7. Ziegler, pp. 231–234
8. Broad, p. 37.
9. Broad, p. 47.
10. Beaverbrook, pp. 28–33; Windsor, p. 314; Ziegler, pp. 292–295.
11. Broad, p. 56; Williams, p. 85.
12. Broad, p. 71.
13. Williams, pp. 93–94.
14. Broad, p. 75.
15. Williams, p. 101.
16. Williams, p. 134.
17. Williams, p. 146.
18. Williams, pp. 149–151.
19. Williams, pp. 8–11.
20. The Duke of Windsor, p. 136.
21. The Duke of Windsor, p. 301; Beaverbrook, p. 14; Williams, pp. 70–71.
22. See, for example, Virginia Woolf's diary quoted in Williams, p. 40.
23. Ziegler, p. 236.
24. Howarth, p. 61.
25. Quoted in Jones, Chris (29 January 2003), Profile: Wallis Simpson, BBC, retrieved 2 May 2010
26. Williams, pp. 96–97.
27. Vickers, p. 163.
28. Vickers, p. 185.
29. John Aird's diary, quoted in Ziegler, p. 234.
30. Ziegler, p. 312.
31. Pope-Hennessy, James (1959), Queen Mary, London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd, p. 574
32. Williams, pp. 40–41.
33. Williams, p. 266.
34. Williams, p. 90; Ziegler, p. 296.
35. Ann Sumner Holmes (2016), The Church of England and Divorce in the Twentieth Century: Legalism and Grace, Taylor & Francis, p. 44
36. G. I. T. Machin, "Marriage and the Churches in the 1930s: Royal abdication and divorce reform, 1936–7." Journal of Ecclesiastical History 42.1 (1991): 68–81.
37. "A Historic Barrier Drops", Time, 20 July 1981, retrieved 2 May 2010
38. Laliberte, Marissa (19 March 2020), "How Queen Elizabeth II Will Step Down—Without Giving Up Her Title", Reader's Digest, retrieved 1 July 2020
39. Weir, Alison (1996), Britain's Royal Families: The Complete Genealogy, London: Random House, pp. 152–154, ISBN 978-0-7126-7448-5
40. Phillips, Roderick (July 1993), "Divorced, Beheaded, Died", History Today, 43 (7), pp. 9–12
41. Bradford, p. 241.
42. The Duke of Windsor, p. 338.
43. Ramsay MacDonald's diary, quoted in Williams, p. 60.
44. See, for example, Williams, p. 59.
45. Vickers, p. 140; Ziegler, p. 288.
46. The Duke of Windsor, p. 253.
47. Beaverbrook, p. 20.
48. Ziegler, pp. 271–272.
49. Howarth, p. 62.
50. Williams, pp. 196–197; Ziegler, pp. 273–274.
51. Bowcott, Owen; Bates, Stephen (30 January 2003), "Fear that Windsors would 'flit' to Germany", The Guardian, retrieved 2 May 2010
52. The Duke of Windsor, p. 332.
53. Éamon de Valera quoted in Bradford, p. 188.
54. The Diaries of William Lyon Mackenzie King, Library and Archives Canada, 8 December 1936, p. 555
55. Hubbard, R. H. (1977), Rideau Hall, Montreal and London: McGill-Queen's University Press, p. 187, ISBN 978-0-7735-0310-6
56. Williams, p. 130.
57. Williams, pp. 130–131.
58. Williams, p. 113.
59. Williams, p. 173; Ziegler, p. 291.
60. Williams, pp. 173–176.
61. Williams, p. 177.
62. Evans, W. (1968), Journey to Harley Street, London: David Rendel, p. 219.
63. Evans, p. 221.
64. Williams, pp. 179–181.
65. Williams, pp. 198–199.
66. Williams, pp. 181–182.
67. Williams, pp. 199–200.
68. See, for example, Williams, pp. 138–144.
69. Beaverbrook, p. 68; Broad, p. 188; Ziegler, p. 308.
70. Ziegler, p. 308; The Duke of Windsor, p. 373.
71. Casciani, Dominic (30 January 2003), King's abdication appeal blocked, BBC News, retrieved 2 May 2010
72. The Duke of Windsor, p. 361.
73. Beaverbrook, p. 71; Williams, p. 156.
74. Norton-Taylor, Richard (23 May 2013), "Ministers ordered bugging of King Edward VIII's phones, records reveal", The Guardian, retrieved 23 May 2013
75. The Duke of Windsor, pp. 378–379.
76. The Duke of Windsor, pp. 386–387.
77. Cretney, Stephen (September 2003), "Edward, Mrs Simpson and the Divorce Law: Stephen Cretney Investigates Whether the Government Colluded in the Suppression of Evidence That Might Have Prevented Wallis Simpson's Divorce and Royal Marriage", History Today, 53: 26 ff., retrieved 2 May 2010 (subscription required).
78. Norton-Taylor, Richard; Evans, Rob (2 March 2000), "Edward and Mrs Simpson cast in new light", The Guardian, retrieved 2 May 2010
79. "Duchess of Windsor", Time, 21 December 1936, retrieved 2 May 2010
80. Beaverbrook, p. 81; Williams, p. 217.
81. The Duke of Windsor, p. 407.
82. "No. 34350". The London Gazette. 15 December 1936. p. 8117.
83. Anne Twomey (18 September 2014), Professor Anne Twomey – Succession to the Crown: foiled by Canada? (Digital video), London: University College London
84. Constitution (Amendment No. 27) Act, 1936, Government of Ireland, retrieved 2 May 2010
85. Executive Authority (External Relations) Act, 1936, Government of Ireland, retrieved 2 May 2010
86. David Lloyd George quoted in Williams, p. 241.
87. The Diaries of William Lyon Mackenzie King, Library and Archives Canada, 9 December 1936, p. 561
88. Hart-Davis, Duff, ed. (1989) In Royal Service: Letters & Journals of Sir Alan Lascelles from 1920 to 1936, quoted in Vickers, Hugo. "The courtier's spiky tongue". The Times, Thursday, 26 January 1989.
89. The Duke of Windsor, p. 413; Ziegler, p. 331.
90. Stuart, Charles, ed. (1975), The Reith Diaries, London: Collins, pp. 192–193, ISBN 0-00-211174-8
91. The Duke of Windsor, pp. 409–413.
92. Ziegler, p. 336.
93. "No. 34350". The London Gazette. 15 December 1936. p. 8115.
94. "Mrs Ernest Simpson's Divorce". The Times, Tuesday, 4 May 1937, p. 5, col. C; "The Duke of Windsor: Departure from Austria", The Times, Tuesday, 4 May 1937, p. 5, col. C.
95. Ziegler, p. 529.
96. Roberts, Andrew (2000), Antonia Fraser (ed.), The House of Windsor, London: Cassell and Co, p. 53, ISBN 0-304-35406-6
97. Ziegler, pp. 376–378.
98. Donaldson, Frances (1974), Edward VIII, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, pp. 331–332, ISBN 0-297-76787-9
99. "Windsor Helpless as World Drifts to War", Chicago Tribune, 13 December 1966, p. 2
100. Matthew, H. C. G. (September 2004; online edition January 2008) "Edward VIII, later Prince Edward, duke of Windsor (1894–1972)", Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/31061, retrieved 1 May 2010 (Subscription required)
101. Documents on German Foreign Policy 1918–1945 Series D, Volume VIII, quoted in Bradford, p. 434
102. Bloch, p. 91
103. Bloch, pp. 86, 102; Ziegler, pp. 430–432
104. Ziegler, p. 434
105. Bloch, p. 93
106. Bloch, pp. 93–94, 98–103, 119
107. Walker, Andrew (29 January 2003), Profile: Edward VIII, BBC News, retrieved 2 May 2010
108. Ziegler, pp. 434 ff.
109. Williamson, Philip (2007), Olechnowicz, Andrzej (ed.), "The monarchy and public values 1910–1953", The monarchy and the British nation, 1780 to the present, Cambridge University Press, p. 225, ISBN 978-0-521-84461-1

References

• Beaverbrook, Lord (1966), A. J. P. Taylor (ed.), The Abdication of King Edward VIII, London: Hamish Hamilton
• Bloch, Michael (1982), The Duke of Windsor's War, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, ISBN 0-297-77947-8
• Bradford, Sarah (1989), King George VI, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, ISBN 0-297-79667-4
• Broad, Lewis (1961), The Abdication, London: Frederick Muller
• Howarth, Patrick (1987), George VI, London: Hutchinson, ISBN 0-09-171000-6
• Vickers, Hugo (2006), Elizabeth, the Queen Mother, London: Arrow Books, ISBN 978-0-09-947662-7
• Williams, Susan (2003), The People's King: The True Story of the Abdication, London: Penguin Books, ISBN 0-7139-9573-4
• Windsor, HRH The Duke of (1951), A King's Story, London: Cassell and Co, OCLC 1903717
• Ziegler, Philip (1991), King Edward VIII, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, ISBN 0-394-57730-2

Further reading

• Digital reproduction of the Abdication Act 1936 on the Parliamentary Archives catalogue