2016 Citi Open – Men's Doubles
Bob and Mike Bryan were the defending champions, but chose not to participate this year.
Men's Doubles | |
---|---|
2016 Citi Open | |
Champions | |
Runners-up | |
Final score | 7–6(7–3), 7–6(7–4) |
Daniel Nestor and Édouard Roger-Vasselin won the title, defeating Łukasz Kubot and Alexander Peya in the final, 7–6(7–3), 7–6(7–4).
Seeds
Marcelo Melo / Bruno Soares (First round) Daniel Nestor / Édouard Roger-Vasselin (Champions) Florin Mergea / Horia Tecău (Semifinals) Treat Huey / Max Mirnyi (First round, retired)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
Draw
First Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 7 | 4 | [7] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | 6 | [10] | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 6 | [10] | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Q | 6 | 2 | [8] | 4 | 77 | [10] | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 1 | 4r | 6 | 64 | [3] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 3 | 6 | 715 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 6 | 2 | 613 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 4 | 63 | 64 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | 6 | 2 | 77 | 77 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | 3 | 1 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | 3 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 6 | [6] | 2 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 2 | [10] | 4 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | 6 | 64 | [8] | 2 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 4 | 77 | [10] |
Qualifying
Seeds
Ken Skupski / Neal Skupski (First round) Brian Baker / Austin Krajicek (Qualified)
Qualifiers
Qualifying draw
First Round | Qualifying Competition | ||||||||||||
1 | 3 | 6 | [9] | ||||||||||
6 | 1 | [11] | |||||||||||
6 | 4 | [8] | |||||||||||
2/PR | 4 | 6 | [10] | ||||||||||
WC | 4 | 1 | |||||||||||
2/PR | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||
gollark: Not really.
gollark: Increased use of privacy-preserving tools makes them cheaper and less private ones more expensive, increases the social acceptability of private tools, and makes it more expensive to do spying.
gollark: actually, it does.
gollark: You can just do *some* privacy-benefiting stuff but not go full something or other.
gollark: You could say it about lots of things. Dealing with dangerous dangers is sensible as long as the cost isn't more than, er, chance of bad thing times badness of bad thing.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.