2016 Citi Open – Men's Doubles

Bob and Mike Bryan were the defending champions, but chose not to participate this year.

Men's Doubles
2016 Citi Open
Champions Daniel Nestor
Édouard Roger-Vasselin
Runners-up Łukasz Kubot
Alexander Peya
Final score7–6(7–3), 7–6(7–4)

Daniel Nestor and Édouard Roger-Vasselin won the title, defeating Łukasz Kubot and Alexander Peya in the final, 7–6(7–3), 7–6(7–4).

Seeds

  1. Marcelo Melo / Bruno Soares (First round)
  2. Daniel Nestor / Édouard Roger-Vasselin (Champions)
  3. Florin Mergea / Horia Tecău (Semifinals)
  4. Treat Huey / Max Mirnyi (First round, retired)

Draw

Key

Draw

First Round Quarterfinals Semifinals Final
1 M Melo
B Soares
7 4 [7]
S Johnson
J Sock
5 6 [10] S Johnson
J Sock
4 0
Ł Kubot
A Peya
4 6 [10] Ł Kubot
A Peya
6 6
Q B Baker
A Krajicek
6 2 [8] Ł Kubot
A Peya
4 77 [10]
4 T Huey
M Mirnyi
1 4r H Kontinen
J Peers
6 64 [3]
H Kontinen
J Peers
6 3 H Kontinen
J Peers
6 715
C Guccione
S Querrey
6 6 C Guccione
S Querrey
2 613
E Butorac
S Lipsky
2 4 Ł Kubot
A Peya
63 64
O Marach
F Martin
7 6 2 D Nestor
É Roger-Vasselin
77 77
R Štěpánek
N Zimonjić
5 3 O Marach
F Martin
1 4
WC D Kudla
F Tiafoe
3 3 3 F Mergea
H Tecău
6 6
3 F Mergea
H Tecău
6 6 3 F Mergea
H Tecău
3 4
JS Cabal
R Farah
2 6 [6] 2 D Nestor
É Roger-Vasselin
6 6
R Lindstedt
V Troicki
6 2 [10] R Lindstedt
V Troicki
4 3
WC T Fritz
R Opelka
6 64 [8] 2 D Nestor
É Roger-Vasselin
6 6
2 D Nestor
É Roger-Vasselin
4 77 [10]

Qualifying

Seeds

  1. Ken Skupski / Neal Skupski (First round)
  2. Brian Baker / Austin Krajicek (Qualified)

Qualifiers

  1. Brian Baker / Austin Krajicek

Qualifying draw

First Round Qualifying Competition
          
1 Ken Skupski
Neal Skupski
3 6 [9]
Ryan Harrison
Dennis Novikov
6 1 [11]
Ryan Harrison
Dennis Novikov
6 4 [8]
2/PR Brian Baker
Austin Krajicek
4 6 [10]
WC Víctor Estrella Burgos
Mackenzie McDonald
4 1
2/PR Brian Baker
Austin Krajicek
6 6
gollark: Not really.
gollark: Increased use of privacy-preserving tools makes them cheaper and less private ones more expensive, increases the social acceptability of private tools, and makes it more expensive to do spying.
gollark: actually, it does.
gollark: You can just do *some* privacy-benefiting stuff but not go full something or other.
gollark: You could say it about lots of things. Dealing with dangerous dangers is sensible as long as the cost isn't more than, er, chance of bad thing times badness of bad thing.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.