1987 World Figure Skating Championships
The 1987 World Figure Skating Championships were held in Cincinnati, USA on March. Medals were awarded in men's singles, ladies' singles, pair skating, and ice dancing.
| 1987 World Figure Skating Championships | |
|---|---|
| Type: | ISU Championship |
| Date: | March 10 – 15 |
| Season: | 1986–87 |
| Location: | Cincinnati, USA |
| Venue: | Riverfront Coliseum |
| Champions | |
Men's singles: .svg.png){kind=small} | |
Ladies' singles:  | |
Pair skating:  | |
| Ice dance: | |
| Previous: 1986 World Championships | |
| Next: 1988 World Championships | |
Medal tables
Medalists
| Discipline | Gold | Silver | Bronze |
|---|---|---|---|
| Men | |
 |
|
| Ladies | |
|
|
| Pairs | |
|
|
| Ice dancing | |
|
|
Medals by country
| Rank | Nation | Gold | Silver | Bronze | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| 2 | | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| 3 | | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 4 | | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Totals (4 nations) | 4 | 4 | 4 | 12 | |
Results
Men
.svg.png){kind=small}
.svg.png){kind=small}
Ladies
Pairs
| Rank | Name | Nation | TFP | SP | FS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ekaterina Gordeeva / Sergei Grinkov | | 1.5 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | Elena Valova / Oleg Vasiliev | | 3.0 | 2 | 2 |
| 3 | Jill Watson / Peter Oppegard | | 4.5 | 3 | 3 |
| 4 | Larisa Selezneva / Oleg Makarov | | 7.5 | 7 | 4 |
| 5 | Denise Benning / Lyndon Johnston | | 8.0 | 6 | 5 |
| 6 | Cynthia Coull / Mark Rowsom | | 8.0 | 4 | 6 |
| 7 | Gillian Wachsman / Todd Waggoner | | 10.5 | 5 | 8 |
| 8 | Christine Hough / Doug Ladret | | 11.0 | 8 | 7 |
| 9 | Cheryl Peake / Andrew Naylor |  | 13.5 | 9 | 9 |
| 10 | Lenka Knapová / René Novotný |  | 15.0 | 10 | 10 |
| 11 | Sonja Adalbert / Daniele Caprano |  | 17.0 | 12 | 11 |
| 12 | Danielle Carr / Stephen Carr | .svg.png){kind=small} | 17.5 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | Shuk-Ching Ngai / Cheuk-Fai Lai | .svg.png){kind=small} | 19.5 | 13 | 13 |
Ice dancing
gollark: Well, yes, but they're byte sequences.
gollark: I mean, it's better than C and stuff, and I wouldn't mind writing simple apps in it.
gollark: Speaking specifically about the error handling, it may be "simple", but it's only "simple" in the sense of "the compiler writers do less work". It's very easy to mess it up by forgetting the useless boilerplate line somewhere, or something like that.
gollark: Speaking more generally than the type system, Go is just really... anti-abstraction... with, well, the gimped type system, lack of much metaprogramming support, and weird special cases, and poor error handling.
gollark: - They may be working on them, but they initially claimed that they weren't necessary and they don't exist now. Also, I don't trust them to not do them wrong.- Ooookay then- Well, generics, for one: they *kind of exist* in that you can have generic maps, channels, slices, and arrays, but not anything else. Also this (https://fasterthanli.me/blog/2020/i-want-off-mr-golangs-wild-ride/), which is mostly about the file handling not being good since it tries to map on concepts which don't fit. Also channels having weird special syntax. Also `for` and `range` and `new` and `make` basically just being magic stuff which do whatever the compiler writers wanted with no consistency- see above- Because there's no generic number/comparable thing type. You would need to use `interface{}` or write a new function (with identical code) for every type you wanted to compare- You can change a signature somewhere and won't be alerted, but something else will break because the interface is no longer implemented- They are byte sequences. https://blog.golang.org/strings.- It's not. You need to put `if err != nil { return err }` everywhere.
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.