1956 Swiss referendums

Five referendums were held in Switzerland during 1956.[1] The first was held on 4 March on a federal resolution on a limited extension of price controls, and was approved by voters. The second and third were held on 13 May on a popular initiative "on the grant of concessions for water usage" and a federal resolution on government efforts to strengthen the economy of Graubünden, both of which were rejected by voters. The fourth and fifth were held on 30 September on a federal resolution on changing the breadstuffs law and a petition about decisions on expenditure taken by the Federal Assembly, both of which were also rejected.[1]

This article is part of a series on the
politics and government of
Switzerland
 Switzerland portal

Results

March: Price controls

Choice Popular vote Cantons
Votes % Full Half Total
For542,42577.519622
Against157,10622.5000
Blank votes16,118
Invalid votes2,899
Total718,54810019622
Registered voters/turnout1,454,50649.4
Source: Nohlen & Stöver

May: Water usage

Choice Popular vote Cantons
Votes % Full Half Total
For266,22236.9212.5
Against454,83163.117519.5
Blank votes35,070
Invalid votes1,369
Total757,49210019622
Registered voters/turnout1,454,26952.6
Source: Nohlen & Stöver

May: Measures to strengthen the economy of Graubünden

Choice Votes %
For316,27642.5
Against428,56157.5
Blank votes19,203
Invalid votes1,503
Total765,543100
Registered voters/turnout1,454,26952.6
Source: Nohlen & Stöver

September: Breadstuffs

Choice Popular vote Cantons
Votes % Full Half Total
For239,89038.7435.5
Against379,24561.315316.5
Blank votes21,263
Invalid votes1,206
Total641,60410019622
Registered voters/turnout1,459,82444.0
Source: Nohlen & Stöver

September: Federal Assembly expenditure

Choice Popular vote Cantons
Votes % Full Half Total
For276,66045.5829
Against331,11754.511413
Blank votes30,926
Invalid votes1,193
Total639,89610019622
Registered voters/turnout1,459,82443.8
Source: Nohlen & Stöver
gollark: `TODO: implement magic algorithm to detect authorized agents of law enforcement and/or good guys who will totally not abuse this power.`
gollark: The reason for that is documented: `Permit access to "locked" computers by authorized agents of law enforcement.`.
gollark: If you care at all, and indeed if you don't, you can find most patched potatOS sandbox escapes by searching for `PS#` inside https://pastebin.com/wKdMTPwQ.
gollark: PS#D7CD76C0 is that you could do those during queueEvent. I should probably assign a bug number to the Polychoron-based version.
gollark: Yes, basically.

References

  1. Nohlen, D & Stöver, P (2010) Elections in Europe: A data handbook, p1916 ISBN 9783832956097
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.