1939 Swiss referendums

Four referendums were held in Switzerland during 1939.[1] The first two were held on 22 January on a popular initiative on civil rights (which was rejected) and a federal resolution on the restricted use of the urgency clause in the constitution (which was approved).[1] The third was held on 4 June on a constitutional amendment regarding the funding for government policies on defence and unemployment, and was approved by voters.[1] The fourth was held on 3 December on a federal law on the employment status and insurance for federal civil servants, and was rejected by voters.[1]

This article is part of a series on the
politics and government of
Switzerland
 Switzerland portal

Background

The referendums on the urgency clause and the funding of defence and unemployment policies both involved amending the constitution, and so were "obligatory" referendums,[1] requiring a double majority; a majority of the popular vote and majority of the cantons.[2] The decision of each canton was based on the vote in that canton.[2] Full cantons counted as one vote, whilst half cantons counted as half.[2] The popular initiative on civil rights also required a double majority, whilst the referendum on civil servants was an optional referendum,[1] requiring only a majority of voters in favour to pass.[2]

Results

Choice Popular vote Cantons
Votes % Full Half Total
For141,32328.9000
Against347,34071.119622
Blank votes77,687
Invalid votes3,211
Total569,56110019622
Registered voters/turnout1,223,53646.6
Source: Nohlen & Stöver

January: Use of the urgency clause

Choice Popular vote Cantons
Votes % Full Half Total
For346,02469.118621
Against155,03230.9101
Blank votes65,459
Invalid votes3,046
Total569,56110019622
Registered voters/turnout1,223,53646.6
Source: Nohlen & Stöver

June: Funding for defence and unemployment policy

Choice Popular vote Cantons
Votes % Full Half Total
For445,62269.116619
Against199,54030.9303
Blank votes24,871
Invalid votes1,420
Total671,45310019622
Registered voters/turnout1,226,87354.7
Source: Nohlen & Stöver

December: Civil servants

Choice Votes %
For290,23837.6
Against481,03562.4
Blank votes19,524
Invalid votes2,102
Total792,899100
Registered voters/turnout1,241,40463.9
Source: Nohlen & Stöver
gollark: As planned.
gollark: Indeed.
gollark: There are mesh networks in a few places, but I don't think they've gotten massively wide adoption because the average consumer doesn't really care (and they still need to interact with the regular internet, which is hard and beelike).
gollark: Phones spend tons of battery power on communicating with faraway towers when they could also practically relay data via nearby devices on lower power for non-real-time data.
gollark: Anyway, as much as I somewhat disapprove of ☭ in general, the current hierarchical structure of consumer internet connectivity is ridiculous and inefficient and would probably have been replaced if it wasn't for the hardproblemness of good mesh networking.

References

  1. Nohlen, D & Stöver, P (2010) Elections in Europe: A data handbook, pp1912 ISBN 9783832956097
  2. Nohlen & Stöver, p1891
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.