1922 Swiss federal election
Federal elections were held in Switzerland on 29 October 1922.[1] The Free Democratic Party remained the largest party in the National Council, winning 60 of the 198 seats.[2]
.svg.png) |
|---|
| This article is part of a series on the politics and government of Switzerland |
 |
Results
National Council
| Party | Votes | % | Seats | +/– |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free Democratic Party | 208,144 | 28.3 | 60 | 0 |
| Social Democratic Party | 170,974 | 23.3 | 43 | +2 |
| Swiss Conservative People's Party | 153,836 | 20.9 | 44 | +3 |
| Party of Farmers, Traders and Independents | 118,382 | 16.1 | 34 | +4 |
| Liberal Democratic Party | 29,041 | 4.0 | 10 | +1 |
| Democratic Group | 15,144 | 2.1 | 3 | –1 |
| Communist Party | 13,441 | 1.8 | 2 | New |
| Grütli Union | 9,313 | 1.3 | 0 | –2 |
| Evangelical People's Party | 6,306 | 0.9 | 1 | 0 |
| Liberal Socialist Party | 1,106 | 0.2 | 0 | New |
| National Progressive Party | 8,717 | 1.2 | 1 | New |
| Independent Free Voters | 0 | New | ||
| Young Liberals | 0 | New | ||
| Young Radicals | 0 | –1 | ||
| Invalid/blank votes | 16,455 | – | – | – |
| Total | 750,859 | 100 | 198 | +9 |
| Registered voters/turnout | 983,238 | 76.4 | – | – |
| Source: Nohlen & Stöver | ||||
Council of States
In several cantons the members of the Council of States were chosen by the cantonal parliaments.[3]
| Party | Seats | +/– |
|---|---|---|
| Free Democratic Party | 23 | 0 |
| Swiss Conservative People's Party | 17 | 0 |
| Liberal Democratic Party | 1 | –1 |
| Democratic Group | 1 | 0 |
| Party of Farmers, Traders and Independents | 1 | 0 |
| Social Democratic Party | 1 | +1 |
| Other parties | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 44 | 0 |
| Source: Nohlen & Stöver | ||
gollark: > Some may argue that the CDC originally claimed that masks were ineffective as a way to retain the already-small supply of masks for healthcare providers and medical officials. Others may argue that the CDC made this claim due to ever-developing research around the virus. I am arguing, however, that the CDC made the claim that masks are ineffective because the CDC’s sole purpose is to provide scientific legitimation of the U.S. as a eugenicist project through medical genocide. As outlined in this essay, the CDC has a history of releasing deadly information and later backtracking on it when the damage has already been done.
gollark: > Choosing to tell the public that supplies that could benefit everyone is ineffective, rather than calling for more supplies to be created—in the midst of a global pandemic, no less—is eugenics. Making the conscious decision to tell the general public that something is ineffective when you have not done all of the necessary research, especially when medical officials are using the very same equipment, is medical and scientific genocide.
gollark: It seems like they seem to claim they're genociding *everyone*, actually?
gollark: Are you familiar with relativistic magnetoapiodynamics?
gollark: And they disagree with people disagreeing.
References
- Nohlen, D & Stöver, P (2010) Elections in Europe: A data handbook, p1894 ISBN 9783832956097
- Nohlen & Stöver, p1953
- Nohlen & Stöver, p1956
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.