Warsaw Open
The Warsaw Open, formerly the J&S Cup, was a tennis tournament on the WTA Tour held in Warsaw, Poland. Held since 1995, the tournament was played on outdoor clay courts. The event returned for 2 years to the WTA Tour in 2009 after a year's hiatus but its slot on the tour calendar was taken over by the Brussels Open from 2011.
| Polsat Warsaw Open | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Tournament information | |
| Founded | 1995 |
| Abolished | 2010 |
| Location | Warsaw Poland |
| Venue | Legia Tennis Centre |
| Category | Premier |
| Surface | Clay / Outdoors |
| Draw | 32M/32Q/16D |
| Prize money | $600,000 |
| Website | www.pwo.polsat.pl |
Past Finals
Singles
| Year | Tournament Name | Champion | Runner-up | Score in Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ↓ Tier III Tournament ↓ | ||||
| 1995 | Warsaw Cup by Heros |  |  | 7–6, 4–6, 6–1 |
| 1996 | Warsaw Cup |  | | 3–6, 6–2, 6–1 |
| 1997 | Warsaw Cup by Heros | | | 6–4, 6–4 |
| 1998 | Warsaw Cup by Heros |  |  | 6–0, 6–3 |
| ↓ Tier IV Tournament ↓ | ||||
| 1999 | Warsaw Cup by Heros | |  | 7–5, 7–6(7–3) |
| 2000 | Warsaw Cup by Heros | |  | 2–6, 6–4, 7–5 |
| 2001 | Tournament not held | |||
| ↓ Tier III Tournament ↓ | ||||
| 2002 | J&S Cup |  | | 6–3, 6–1 |
| ↓ Tier II Tournament ↓ | ||||
| 2003 | J&S Cup | |  | 6–7, 6–0, 3–0, retired |
| 2004 | J&S Cup | | | 6–1, 6–4 |
| 2005 | J&S Cup | .svg.png){kind=small} | | 3–6, 6–2, 7–5 |
| 2006 | J&S Cup | | | 7–5, 6–2 |
| 2007 | J&S Cup | |  | 6–1, 6–3 |
| 2008 | Tournament not held | |||
| ↓ WTA Premier Tournament ↓ | ||||
| 2009 | Warsaw Open |  | | 7–63, 3–6, 6–0 |
| 2010 | Polsat Warsaw Open | |  | 6–3, 6–4 |
Doubles
.svg.png){kind=small}
gollark: There actually are worries about development of this stuff slowing down.
gollark: <@!336962240848855040> As far as I know 3nm does not actually exist yet, and there are a bunch of possible sizes you could use.
gollark: > The 22 nm node may be the first time where the gate length is not necessarily smaller than the technology node designation. For example, a 25 nm gate length would be typical for the 22 nm node.
gollark: As far as I know it *used* to actually be a measure of something, but they hit issues around... 22nm or something, don't really know... and despite said measure not changing very much the processes kept getting better, so they just reduced them.
gollark: I mean, generally if the number goes down the density of the transistors goes up, but it's not an actual measurement of anything.
See also
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.