Walgettosuchus

Walgettosuchus (meaning "Walgett crocodile") is a dubious or invalid genus of extinct tetanuran theropod dinosaur that lived in Australia during the Late Cretaceous (Cenomanian).[1] It is only known from a single caudal vertebra.[2]

Walgettosuchus
Temporal range: Early-mid Cenomanian
~99–96 Ma
↓
Holotype caudal vertebra seen from three different angles
Scientific classification
Kingdom:
Animalia
Phylum:
Chordata
Class:
Sauropsida
Superorder:
Dinosauria
Order:
Saurischia
Suborder:
†Theropoda
(unranked):
†Tetanurae
Genus:
†Walgettosuchus

von Huene, 1932
Binomial name
†Walgettosuchus woodwardi
von Huene, 1932

Discovery and naming

An opalised vertebra of a theropod dinosaur was discovered in 1905 by T.C. Wollaston in an opal bearing sandstone at Lightning Ridge near Walgett, in New South Wales.[3] The fossil was sent to the British Museum of Natural History and was reported in January 1909 by Arthur Smith Woodward.[2]

In 1932 the type species Walgettosuchus woodwardi was named by Friedrich von Huene, based on this vertebra.[3] The generic name is derived from the town of Walgett and Soukhos, the Greek name of the Egyptian crocodile god Sobek. During the 1930s Von Huene tended to form dinosaur names with the ending ~suchus instead of ~saurus because of the closer relationship to crocodiles than to lizards. The specific name honours Woodward.

The holotype, BMNH R3717, was found in the Cenomanian-age Late Cretaceous Griman Creek Formation. It consists of a 63-millimetre-long (2.5 in) incomplete amphicoelous (concave surfaces for articulation on the anterior and posterior faces) caudal vertebral centrum.[3] For unknown reasons,[1] he believed it had elongate prezygapophyses.[3] He also suggested that if more material was known, it could prove to be synonymous with other Lightning Ridge "coelurosaurs" (i.e. Rapator; coelurosaur in the outdated sense of any small theropod).[3]

Classification

Von Huene assigned Walgettosuchus to the Ornithomimidae in 1932.[3] In his 1990 review, Ralph Molnar noted that the type cannot be distinguished from tail vertebrae from ornithomimids or allosaurids, and considered it to be an indeterminate theropod and a nomen dubium or (more likely) an invalid taxon.[1]

gollark: Why? They're all garbage-collected, abstract over raw OS-level stuff, have large runtimes, etc.
gollark: Python is higher-level than JS and Java and such? Really?
gollark: If you actually get the concepts then you can probably pick up a different language fine.
gollark: The syntax isn't very important, the semantics are what matter, and Python is basically your standard modern high-level multiparadigm language so the concepts transfer fine to JS and whatever else.
gollark: Don't start with C++, it has similar problems plus masses of complexity stacked on.

References
  1. Molnar, R.E. (1990). Problematic Theropoda: "Carnosaurs". In: Weishampel, D.B., Dodson, P., and Osmólska, H. (eds.). The Dinosauria. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press:Berkeley and Los Angeles, p. 306-317. ISBN 0-520-06727-4
  2. A.S. Woodward, 1910, "On remains of a megalosaurian dinosaur from New South Wales", Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science 79: 482-483
  3. von Huene, F. (1932). Die fossile Reptil-Ordnung Saurischia, ihte Entwicklung und Geschichte. Monographien zur Geologie und Palaeontologie 1(4). 361 p. [German]
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.