Vipera berus

Vipera berus, the common European adder[3] or common European viper,[4] is a venomous snake that is extremely widespread and can be found throughout most of Western Europe and as far as East Asia.[2] Known by a host of common names including common adder and common viper, adders have been the subject of much folklore in Britain and other European countries.[5] They are not regarded as especially dangerous;[3] the snake is not aggressive and usually bites only when really provoked, stepped on, or picked up. Bites can be very painful, but are seldom fatal.[6] The specific name, berus, is New Latin and was at one time used to refer to a snake, possibly the grass snake, Natrix natrix.[7]

Common European adder
Conservation status
Least Concern  (IUCN 3.1)[1]
Scientific classification
Kingdom:	Animalia
Phylum:	Chordata
Class:	Reptilia
Order:	Squamata
Suborder:	Serpentes
Family:	Viperidae
Genus:	Vipera
Species:	V. berus
Binomial name
Vipera berus (Linnaeus, 1758)
Synonyms[2]
Species synonymy [Coluber] berus Linnaeus, 1758 [Coluber] Chersea Linnaeus, 1758 Coluber prester Linnaeus, 1761 Coluber vipera Anglorum Laurenti, 1768 Coluber Melanis Pallas, 1771 Coluber Scytha Pallas, 1773 C[oluber]. Scytha — Bonnaterre, 1790 Vipera melanis — Sonnini & Latreille, 1801 Vipera berus — Daudin, 1803 Vipera chersea — Daudin, 1803 Vipera prester — Daudin, 1803 [Coluber] Caeruleus Sheppard, 1804 Vipera communis Leach, 1817 Coluber chersea var. marasso Pollini, 1818 [Pelias] berus — Merrem, 1820 [Vipera] marasso — Sette, 1821 Vipera limnaea Bendiscioli, 1826 Vipera trilamina Millet, 1828 [Pelias] Chersea — Wagler, 1830 Vipera torva Lenz, 1832 Pelias dorsalis Gray, 1842 V[ipera]. Prester var. gagatina Freyer, 1842 Echidnoides trilamina — Mauduyt, 1844 Vipera Pelias Soubeiran, 1855 Pelias berus var. Prester — Günther, 1858 Pelias berus var. Chersea — Günther, 1858 P[elias berus]. Var. dorsalis — Cope, 1860 P[elias berus]. Var. niger Cope, 1860 V[ipera]. (Pelias) berus — Jan, 1863 V[ipera]. (Pelias) berus var. prester — Jan, 1863 V[ipera]. (Pelias) berus var. lymnaea — Jan, 1863 Pelias Chersea — Erber, 1863 Pelias berus — Erber, 1863 Vipera berus var. prester — Jan & Sordelli, 1874 Vipera berus [berus] — Boettger, 1889 [Vipera berus] var. montana Méhelÿ, 1893 Vipera berus — Boulenger, 1896 Pelias berus lugubris Kashehenko, 1902 Vipera berus pelias — Chabanaud, 1923 [Vipera (Pelias) berus] forma brunneomarcata A.F. Reuss, 1923 [Vipera (Pelias) berus] forma luteoalba A.F. Reuss, 1923 [Vipera (Pelias) berus] forma ochracea asymmetrica A.F. Reuss, 1923 [Vipera (Pelias) berus] rudolphi-marchica A.F. Reuss, 1924 [Vipera (Pelias) berus] forma bilineata A.F. Reuss, 1924 Vipera (Pelias) berus forma chersea-splendens A.F. Reuss, 1925 Vipera (Pelias) berus forma ochracea-splendens A.F. Reuss, 1925 Vipera (Pelias) berus forma rutila A.F. Reuss, 1925 Vipera (Pelias) berus forma punctata A.F. Reuss, 1925 Coluber sachalinensis continentalis Nikolski, 1927 P[elias]. sudetica A.F. Reuss, 1927 (nomen nudum) V[ipera]. berus marchici A.F. Reuss, 1927 Vipera berus rudolphi A.F. Reuss, 1927 (nomen nudum) Vipera berus berus — Mertens & L. Müller, 1928 [Pelias] elberfeldi A.F. Reuss, 1929 Pelias rudolphi — A.F. Reuss, 1930 Pelias schöttleri A.F. Reuss, 1930 P[elias]. tyrolensis A.F. Reuss, 1930 Pelias schreiberi A.F. Reuss, 1930 Pelias flavescens A.F. Reuss, 1930 (nomen nudum) Pelias subalpina A.F. Reuss, 1930 (nomen nudum) Pelias neglecta A.F. Reuss, 1932 Vipera berus sphagnosa Krassawzef, 1932 Pelias occidentalis A.F. Reuss, 1933 Pelias occidentalis oldesloensis A.F. Reuss, 1933 (nomen nudum) Pelias occidentalis orbensis A.F. Reuss, 1933 (nomen nudum) Pelias sudetica forma steinii A.F. Reuss, 1935 (nomen nudum) Vipera marchici — A.F. Reuss, 1935 Pelias sudetica steinii forma emarcata A.F. Reuss, 1937 (nomen illegitimum) Vipera (Vipera) berus berus — Obst, 1983 Vipera berus forma brunneomarcata — Golay et al., 1993 Vipera berus forma ochracea-asymmetrica — Golay et al., 1993 Vipera berus forma luteoalba — Golay et al., 1993 Pelias schoettleri — Golay et al., 1993 Coluber coeruleus — Golay et al., 1993 Vipera berus — Golay et al., 1993

The common adder is found in different terrains, habitat complexity being essential for different aspects of its behaviour. It feeds on small mammals, birds, lizards, and amphibians, and in some cases on spiders, worms, and insects. The common adder, like most other vipers, is ovoviviparous. Females breed once every two or three years, with litters usually being born in late summer to early autumn in the Northern Hemisphere. Litters range in size from three to 20 with young staying with their mothers for a few days. Adults grow to a total length (including tail) of 60 to 90 cm (24 to 35 in) and a mass of 50 to 180 g (1.8 to 6.3 oz). Three subspecies are recognized, including the nominate subspecies, Vipera berus berus described here.[8] The snake is not considered to be threatened, though it is protected in some countries.

Taxonomy

The species has three recognised subspecies :

Subspecies[8]	Taxon author[8]	Common name	Geographic range
V. b. berus	(Linnaeus, 1758)	Common European adder[3]	Norway, Sweden, Finland, Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, France, Denmark, Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Northern Italy, Belgium, Netherlands, Great Britain, Poland, Croatia, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Slovenia, Hungary, Romania, Russia, Ukraine, Mongolia, Northwest China (north Xinjiang)
V. b. bosniensis	Boettger, 1889	Balkan cross adder[9]	Balkan Peninsula
V. b. sachalinensis	Zarevskij, 1917	Sakhalin Island adder[10]	Russian Far East (Amur Oblast, Primorskye Kray, Khabarovsk Kray, Sakhalin Island), North Korea, Northeast China (Jilin)

The subspecies V. b. bosniensis and V. b. sachalinensis have been regarded as full species in some recent publications.[3]

The name 'adder' is derived from nædre, an Old English word that had the generic meaning of serpent in the older forms of many Germanic languages. It was commonly used in the Old English version of the Christian Scriptures for the devil and the serpent in the Book of Genesis.[5][11] In the 14th century, 'a nadder' in Middle English was rebracketed to 'an adder' (just as 'a napron' became 'an apron' and 'a nompere' changed into 'an umpire').

In keeping with its wide distribution and familiarity through the ages, Vipera berus has a large number of common names in English, which include:

Common European adder,[3] common European viper,[4] European viper,[12] northern viper,[13] adder, common adder, crossed viper, European adder,[10] common viper, European common viper, cross adder,[9] or common cross adder.[14]

In Denmark, Norway and Sweden, the snake is known as hugorm, hoggorm and huggorm, roughly translated as 'striking snake'. In Finland, it is known as kyykäärme or simply kyy (one of the municipalities of the country, Kyyjärvi, means 'adder lake'), in Estonia it is known as rästik, while in Lithuania it is known as angis. In Poland the snake is called żmija zygzakowata, which translates as 'zigzag viper', due to the pattern on its back.

Description

Relatively thick-bodied, adults usually grow to 60 cm (24 in) in total length (including tail), with an average of 55 cm (22 in).[3] Maximum size varies by region. The largest, at over 90 cm (35 in), are found in Scandinavia; specimens of 104 cm (41 in) have been observed there on two occasions. In France and Great Britain, the maximum size is 80–87 cm (31–34 in).[3] Mass ranges from 50 g (1.8 oz) to about 180 grams (6.3 oz).[15][16]

V. berus: normal and melanistic colour patterns

The head is fairly large and distinct and its sides are almost flat and vertical. The edge of the snout is usually raised into a low ridge. Seen from above, the rostral scale is not visible, or only just. Immediately behind the rostral, there are two (rarely one) small scales.

Dorsally, there are usually five large plates: a squarish frontal (longer than wide, sometimes rectangular), two parietals (sometimes with a tiny scale between the frontal and the parietals), and two long and narrow supraoculars. The latter are large and distinct, each separated from the frontal by one to four small scales. The nostril is situated in a shallow depression within a large nasal scale.

The eye is relatively large—equal in size or slightly larger than the nasal scale—but often smaller in females. Below the supraoculars are six to 13 (usually eight to 10) small circumorbital scales. The temporal scales are smooth (rarely weakly keeled). There are 10–12 sublabials and six to 10 (usually eight or 9) supralabials. Of the latter, the numbers 3 and 4 are the largest, while 4 and 5 (rarely 3 and 4) are separated from the eye by a single row of small scales (sometimes two rows in alpine specimens).[3]

Midbody there are 21 dorsal scales rows (rarely 19, 20, 22, or 23). These are strongly keeled scales, except for those bordering the ventral scales. These scales seem loosely attached to the skin and lower rows become increasingly wide; those closest to the ventral scales are twice as wide as the ones along the midline. The ventral scales number 132–150 in males and 132–158 in females. The anal plate is single. The subcaudals are paired, numbering 32–46 in males and 23–38 in females.[3]

The colour pattern varies, ranging from very light-coloured specimens with small, incomplete, dark dorsal crossbars to entirely brown ones with faint or clear, darker brown markings, and on to melanistic individuals that are entirely dark and lack any apparent dorsal pattern. However, most have some kind of zigzag dorsal pattern down the entire length of their bodies and tails. The head usually has a distinctive dark V or X on the back. A dark streak runs from the eye to the neck and continues as a longitudinal series of spots along the flanks.[3]

Unusually for snakes, the sexes are possible to tell apart by the colour. Females are usually brownish in hue with dark-brown markings, the males are pure grey with black markings. The basal colour of males will often be slightly lighter than that of the females, making the black zigzag pattern stand out. The melanistic individuals are often females.

Distribution and habitat

V. berus

Vipera berus has a wide range. It can be found across the Eurasian land-mass; from northwestern Europe (Great Britain, Belgium, Netherlands, Scandinavia, Germany, France) across southern Europe (Italy, Serbia, Albania, Croatia, Montenegro, Bosnia and Herzegovina, North Macedonia, Bulgaria, and northern Greece) and eastern Europe to north of the Arctic Circle, and Russia to the Pacific Ocean, Sakhalin Island, North Korea, northern Mongolia and northern China. It is found farther north than any other snake species. The type locality was originally listed as 'Europa'. Mertens and Müller (1940) proposed restricting the type locality to 'Upsala, Schweden' (Uppsala, Sweden)[2] and it was eventually restricted to Berthåga, Uppsala by designation of a neotype by Krecsák & Wahlgren (2008).[17]

In several European countries, it is notable as being the only native venomous snake. It is one of only four snake species native to Britain. The other three, the barred grass snake, grass snake and the smooth snake, are non-venomous.[18]

Sufficient habitat complexity is a crucial requirement for the presence of this species, in order to support its various behaviours—basking, foraging, and hibernation—as well as to offer some protection from predators and human harassment.[3] It is found in a variety of habitats, including: chalky downs, rocky hillsides, moors, sandy heaths, meadows, rough commons, edges of woods, sunny glades and clearings, bushy slopes and hedgerows, dumps, coastal dunes, and stone quarries. It will venture into wetlands if dry ground is available nearby and thus may be found on the banks of streams, lakes, and ponds.[19]

In much of southern Europe, such as southern France and northern Italy, it is found in either low lying wetlands or at high altitudes. In the Swiss Alps, it may ascend to about 3,000 m (9,800 ft). In Hungary and Russia, it avoids open steppeland; a habitat in which V. ursinii is more likely to occur. In Russia, however, it does occur in the forest steppe zone.[19]

Conservation status

V. berus female

In Great Britain, it is illegal to kill, injure, harm or sell adders under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981.[20] The same situation applies to Norway under the Viltloven (The Wildlife Act 1981)[21] and Denmark (1981).[22] The common viper is categorised as 'endangered' in Switzerland,[23] and is also protected in some other countries in its range. It is also found in many protected areas.[1] This species is listed as protected (Appendix III) under the Berne Convention.[24]

The International Union for the Conservation of Nature Red List of Threatened Species describes the conservation status as of 'least concern' in view of its wide distribution, presumed large population, broad range of habitats, and likely slow rate of decline though it acknowledges the population to be decreasing.[25] Reduction in habitat for a variety of reasons, fragmentation of populations in Europe due to intense agriculture practices, and collection for the pet trade or for venom extraction have been recorded as major contributing factors for its decline.[1]

Behaviour

V. berus male

This species is mainly diurnal, especially in the north of its range. Further south it is said[26] to be active in the evening, and it may even be active at night during the summer months. It is predominantly a terrestrial species, although it has been known to climb up banks and into low bushes in order to bask or search for prey.[19]

Adders are not usually aggressive, tending to be rather timid and biting only when cornered or alarmed. People are generally bitten only after stepping on them or attempting to pick them up. They will usually disappear into the undergrowth at a hint of any danger, but will return once all is quiet, often to the same spot. Occasionally, individual snakes will reveal their presence with a loud and sustained hissing, hoping to warn off potential aggressors. Often, these turn out to be pregnant females. When the adder is threatened, the front part of the body is drawn into an S-shape to prepare for a strike.[19]

The species is cold-adapted and hibernates in the winter. In Great Britain, males and females hibernate for about 150 and 180 days, respectively. In northern Sweden hibernation lasts 8–9 months. On mild winter days, they may emerge to bask where the snow has melted and will often travel across snow. About 15% of adults and 30–40% of juveniles die during hibernation.[3]

Feeding

V. berus female; head detail.

Diet consists mainly of small mammals, such as mice, rats, voles, and shrews, as well as lizards. Sometimes, slow worms are taken, and even weasels and moles. Adders also feed on amphibians, such as frogs, newts, and salamanders. Birds are also reported[27] to be consumed, especially nestlings and even eggs, for which they will climb into shrubbery and bushes. Generally, diet varies depending on locality.[19] Juveniles will eat nestling mammals, small lizards and frogs as well as worms and spiders. Once they reach about 30 cm (0.98 ft) in length, their diet begins to resemble that of the adults.[3]

Reproduction

In Hungary, mating takes place in the last week of April, whilst in the north it happens later (in the second week of May). Mating has also been observed in June and even early October, but it is not known if this autumn mating results in any offspring.[3] Females often breed once every two years,[19] or even once every three years if the seasons are short and the climate is not conducive.[3]

V. berus – showing strongly keeled scales on dorsal area.

Males find females by following their scent trails, sometimes tracking them for hundreds of metres a day. If a female is found and then flees, the male follows. Courtship involves side-by-side parallel 'flowing' behaviour, tongue flicking along the back and excited lashing of the tail. Pairs stay together for one or two days after mating. Males chase away their rivals and engage in combat. Often, this also starts with the aforementioned flowing behaviour before culminating in the dramatic 'adder dance'.[3] In this act, the males confront each other, raise up the front part of the body vertically, make swaying movements and attempt to push each other to the ground. This is repeated until one of the two becomes exhausted and crawls off to find another mate. Appleby (1971) notes that he has never seen an intruder win one of these contests, as if the frustrated defender is so aroused by courtship that he refuses to lose his chance to mate.[28] There is no record of any biting taking place during these bouts.[19]

Females usually give birth in August or September, but sometimes as early as July, or as late as early October. Litters range in size from 3 to 20. The young are usually born encased in a transparent sac from which they must free themselves. Sometimes, they succeed in freeing themselves from this membrane while still inside the female.

Neonates measure 14 to 23 cm (5.5 to 9.1 in) in total length (including tail), with an average total length of 17 cm (6.7 in). They are born with a fully functional venom apparatus and a reserve supply of yolk within their bodies. They shed their skins for the first time within a day or two. Females do not appear to take much interest in their offspring, but the young have been observed to remain near their mothers for several days after birth.[19]

Venom

Because of the rapid rate of human expansion throughout the range of this species, bites are relatively common. Domestic animals and livestock are frequent victims. In Great Britain, most instances occur in March–October. In Sweden, there are about 1,300 bites a year, with an estimated 12% that require hospitalisation.[3] At least eight different antivenoms are available against bites from this species.[29]

Mallow et al. (2003) describe the venom toxicity as being relatively low compared to other viper species. They cite Minton (1974) who reported the LD₅₀ values for mice to be 0.55 mg/kg IV, 0.80 mg/kg IP and 6.45 mg/kg SC. As a comparison, in one test the minimum lethal dose of venom for a guinea pig was 40–67 mg, but only 1.7 mg was necessary when Daboia russelii venom was used.[3] Brown (1973) gives a higher subcutaneous LD₅₀ range of 1.0–4.0 mg/kg.[14] All agree that the venom yield is low: Minton (1974) mentions 10–18 mg for specimens 48–62 cm (19–24.5 in) in length,[3] while Brown (1973) lists only 6 mg.[14] Relatively speaking, bites from this species are not highly dangerous.[3] In Britain there have been only 14 known fatalities since 1876—the last a 5-year-old child in 1975[6]—and one nearly fatal bite of a 39-year-old woman in Essex in 1998.[6] An 82-year-old woman died following a bite in Germany in 2004, although it is not clear whether her death was due to the effect of the venom.[30] Even so, professional medical help should always be sought as soon as possible after any bite. Very occasionally bites can be life-threatening, particularly in small children, while adults may experience discomfort and disability long after the bite.[6] The length of recovery varies, but may take up to a year.[3]

Local symptoms include immediate and intense pain, followed after a few minutes (but perhaps by as much as 30 minutes) by swelling and a tingling sensation. Blisters containing blood are not common. The pain may spread within a few hours, along with tenderness and inflammation. Reddish lymphangitic lines and bruising may appear, and the whole limb can become swollen and bruised within 24 hours. Swelling may also spread to the trunk, and with children, throughout the entire body. Necrosis and intracompartmental syndromes are very rare.[6]

Systemic symptoms resulting from anaphylaxis can be dramatic. These may appear within 5 minutes post bite, or can be delayed for many hours. Such symptoms include nausea, retching and vomiting, abdominal colic and diarrhoea, incontinence of urine and faeces, sweating, fever, vasoconstriction, tachycardia, lightheadedness, loss of consciousness, blindness, shock, angioedema of the face, lips, gums, tongue, throat and epiglottis, urticaria and bronchospasm. If left untreated, these symptoms may persist or fluctuate for up to 48 hours.[6] In severe cases, cardiovascular failure may occur.[3]

References

1. J.C. Isailovic; M. Vogrin; C. Corti; P. Sá-Sousa; M. Cheylan; J.M. Pleguezuelos; L. Tomović; B. Sterijovski; U. Joger; A. Westerström; B. Borczyk; B. Schmidt; A. Meyer; R. Sindaco; D. Jelić (2009). "Vipera berus". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2009: e.T157248A5059709. Retrieved 13 January 2020.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
2. McDiarmid RW, Campbell JA, Touré T. (1999). Snake Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference, Volume 1. Washington, District of Columbia: Herpetologists' League. ISBN 1-893777-00-6 (series). ISBN 1-893777-01-4 (volume).
3. Mallow D, Ludwig D, Nilson G. (2003). True Vipers: Natural History and Toxinology of Old World Vipers. Malabar, Florida: Krieger Publishing Company. ISBN 0-89464-877-2.
4. Stidworthy J. (1974). Snakes of the World. New York: Grosset & Dunlap Inc. 160 pp. ISBN 0-448-11856-4.
5. "Everyday Adders – the Adder in Folklore". The Herpetological Conservation Trust. Archived from the original on 3 October 2009. Retrieved 7 February 2010.
6. Warrell DA (2005). "Treatment of bites by adders and exotic venomous snakes". British Medical Journal. 331 (7527): 1244–1247. doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7527.1244. PMC 1289323. PMID 16308385.
7. Gotch AF. (1986). Reptiles: Their Latin Names Explained. Poole, UK: Blandford Press. 176 pp. ISBN 0-7137-1704-1.
8. "Vipera berus". Integrated Taxonomic Information System. Retrieved 15 August 2006.
9. Steward JW. (1971). The Snakes of Europe. Cranbury, New Jersey: Associated University Press (Fairleigh Dickinson University Press). 238 pp. LCCCN 77-163307. ISBN 0-8386-1023-4.
10. Mehrtens JM. (1987). Living Snakes of the World in Color. New York: Sterling Publishers. 480 pp. ISBN 0-8069-6460-X.
11. "adder". Dictionary.com Unabridged. Random House, Inc. Retrieved 7 February 2010.
12. U.S. Navy. (1991). Poisonous Snakes of the World. United States Government. New York: Dover Publications Inc. 232 pp. ISBN 0-486-26629-X.
13. Vipera berus at the Reptarium.cz Reptile Database. Accessed 21 November 2007.
14. Brown JH. (1973). Toxicology and Pharmacology of Venoms from Poisonous Snakes. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas. 184 pp. LCCCN 73-229. ISBN 0-398-02808-7.
15. Olsson, M.; Madsen, T.; Shine, R. (1997). "Is sperm really so cheap? Costs of reproduction in male adders,Vipera berus". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 264 (1380): 455–459. doi:10.1098/rspb.1997.0065. JSTOR 50437. PMC 1688262. (includes chart showing range of male mass in one population)
16. Strugariu, Alexandru; Zamfirescu, Ştefan R.; Gherghel, Iulian (2009). "First record of the adder (Vipera berus berus) in Argeș County (Southern Romania)". Biharean Biologist. 3 (2): 164. Archived from the original on 23 October 2013. Retrieved 9 February 2013. (gives example masses of females).
17. Krecsák L, Wahlgren R (2008). "A survey of the Linnaean type material of Coluber berus, Coluber chersea and Coluber prester (Serpentes, Viperidae)". Journal of Natural History. 42 (35–36): 2343–2377. doi:10.1080/00222930802126888.
18. "Adder (Vipera berus)". Wildscreen Archive. Archived from the original on 7 November 2008. Retrieved 2 October 2015.
19. Street D. (1979). The Reptiles of Northern and Central Europe. London: B.T. Batsford Ltd. 272 pp. ISBN 0-7134-1374-3.
20. "Adder (Vipera berus)". Arkive (Images of life on Earth). wildscreen.org.uk. Archived from the original on 11 July 2009. Retrieved 7 February 2010.. This ref cites Beebee T, & Griffiths R. (2000) Amphibians and Reptiles: a Natural History of the British Herpetofauna. London: Harper Collins Publishers Ltd. as the source.
21. Hoggorm on WWF Norway's nature lexicon
22. "Hugorm". Ministry of Environment and Food of Denmark. Miljø- og Fødevareministeriet. Retrieved 27 June 2018.
23. Monney JC, Meyer A. (2005). Rote Liste der gefährdeten Reptilien der Schweiz. Hrsg. Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft BUWAL, Bern und Koordinationsstelle für Amphibien- und Reptilienschutz der Schweiz, Bern. BUWAL-Reihe.
24. Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats, Appendix III at Council of Europe. Accessed 7 February 2010.
25. "IV: The Categories". 2001 IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria version 3.1. iucnredlist.org. Retrieved 14 February 2010.
26. Boulenger GA. (1913). Snakes of Europe. London: Methuen & Co. xi + 269 pp. (Vipera berus, pp. 230-239, Figure 35).
27. Leighton, Gerald R. (1901). The Life-History of British Serpents and Their Local Distribution in the British Isles. Edinburgh & London: Blackwood & Sons. p. 84. ISBN 1-4446-3091-1. Retrieved 8 February 2010.
28. Appleby LG. (1971). British Snakes. London: J. Baker. 150 pp. ISBN 0-212-98393-8.
29. Vipera berus antivenoms at Munich Antivenom Index. Accessed 15 September 2006.
30. Tod durch Kreuzotterbiss? at Gemeinsames Giftinformationszentrum. A 44-year-old man was left seriously injured after he was bitten by an Adder at the Go-Ape adventure park in Dalby, Burgh Yorkshire UK. Accessed 25 May 2007.

Further reading

• Ananjeva NB, Borkin LJ, Darevsky IS, Orlov NL. 1998. [Amphibians and Reptiles. Encyclopedia of Nature of Russia]. Moscow: ABF. (in Russian).
• Arnold EN, Burton JA. 1978. A Field Guide to the Reptiles and Amphibians of Britain and Europe. London: Collins. 272 pp. ISBN 0-00-219318-3. (Vipera berus, pp. 217–218 + Plate 39 + Map 122).
• Boulenger GA. 1896. Catalogue of the Snakes in the British Museum (Natural History). Volume III., Containing the...Viperidæ. London: Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History). (Taylor and Francis, printers). xiv + 727 pp. + Plates I.- XXV. (Vipera berus, pp. 476–481).
• Goin CJ, Goin OB, Zug GR. 1978. Introduction to Herpetology: Third Edition. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman. xi + 378 pp. ISBN 0-7167-0020-4. (Vipera berus, pp. 122, 188, 334).
• Jan G, Sordelli F. 1874. Iconographie générale des Ophidiens: Quarante-cinquième Livraison. Paris: Baillière. Index + Plates I.- VI. (Vipera berus, Plate II, Figure 1; var. prester, Plate II, Figures 2-4; var. concolor, Plate II, Figure 5; var. lymnaea, Plate II, Figure 6).
• Joger U, Lenk P, Baran I, Böhme W, Ziegler T, Heidrich P, Wink M. 1997. The phylogenetic position of Vipera barani and of Vipera nikolskii within the Vipera berus complex. Herpetologica Bonnensis 185-194.
• Linnaeus C. 1758. Systema naturæ per regna tria naturæ, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, diferentiis, synonymis, locis. Tomus I. Editio Decima, Reformata. Stockholm: L. Salvius. 824 pp. (Coluber berus, p. 217).
• Minton SA Jr. 1974. Venom Diseases. Springfield, Illinois: CC Thomas Publ. 256 pp. ISBN 978-0-398-03051-3.
• Morris PA. 1948. Boy's Book of Snakes: How to Recognize and Understand Them. A volume of the Humanizing Science Series, edited by Jacques Cattell. New York: Ronald Press. viii + 185 pp. (The common viper, Vipera berus, pp. 154–155, 182).
• Wüster W, Allum CSE, Bjargardottir IB, Bailey KL, Dawson KJ, Guenioui J, Lewis J, McGurk J, Moore AG, Niskanen M, Pollard CP. 2004. Do aposematism and Batesian mimicry require bright colours? A test, using European viper markings. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 271: 2495–2499. PDF at Wolfgang Wüster, School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor. Accessed 15 August 2006.

External links