Vole

Voles are small rodents that are relatives of lemmings and hamsters, but with a stouter body; a shorter, hairy tail; a slightly rounder head; smaller ears and eyes; and differently formed molars (high-crowned with angular cusps instead of low-crowned with rounded cusps). They are sometimes known as meadow mice or field mice in North America and Australia.

For other uses, see Vole (disambiguation).
Not to be confused with Mole (animal).
Vole
The bank vole (Myodes glareolus) lives in woodland areas in Europe and Asia.
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Rodentia
Family: Cricetidae
Subfamily: Arvicolinae
Groups included
Cladistically included but traditionally excluded taxa

Vole species form the subfamily Arvicolinae with the lemmings and the muskrats. There are approximately 155 different vole species.

Description

Voles are small rodents that grow to 3–9 in (7.6–22.9 cm), depending on the species. Females can have five to ten litters per year. Gestation lasts for three weeks and the young voles reach sexual maturity in a month. As a result of this biological exponential growth, vole populations can grow very large within a short time. A mating pair can birth a hundred more voles in a year.

Voles outwardly resemble several other small animals. Moles, gophers, mice, rats and even shrews have similar characteristics and behavioral tendencies.

Voles thrive on small plants yet, like shrews, they will eat dead animals and, like mice or rats, they can live on almost any nut or fruit. In addition, voles target plants more than most other small animals, making their presence evident. Voles readily girdle small trees and ground cover much like a porcupine. This girdling can easily kill young plants and is not healthy for trees or other shrubs.

Voles often eat succulent root systems and burrow under plants or ground cover and eat away until the plant is dead. Bulbs in the ground are another favorite target for voles; their excellent burrowing and tunnelling skills give them access to sensitive areas without clear or early warning. The presence of large numbers of voles is often only identifiable after they have destroyed a number of plants. However, like other burrowing rodents, they also play beneficial roles, including dispersing nutrients throughout the upper soil layers.[1]

Predators

Many predators eat voles, including martens, owls, hawks, falcons, coyotes, bobcats, foxes, raccoons, snakes, weasels, domestic cats and lynxes. Vole bones are often found in the pellets of the short-eared owl, the northern spotted owl, the saw-whet owl, the barn owl, the great gray owl, and the northern pygmy owl.

Lifespan

The average life of the smaller vole species is three to six months. These voles rarely live longer than 12 months. Larger species, such as the European water vole, live longer and usually die during their second, or rarely their third, winter. As many as 88% of voles are estimated to die within the first month of life.[2]

Genetics and sexual behavior

The prairie vole is a notable animal model for its monogamous social fidelity, since the male is usually socially faithful to the female, and shares in the raising of pups. The woodland vole is also usually monogamous. Another species from the same genus, the meadow vole, has promiscuously mating males, and scientists have changed adult male meadow voles' behavior to resemble that of prairie voles in experiments in which a single gene was introduced into the brain by a virus.[3]

The behavior is influenced by the number of repetitions of a particular string of microsatellite DNA. Male prairie voles with the longest DNA strings spend more time with their mates and pups than male prairie voles with shorter strings.[4] However, other scientists have disputed the gene's relationship to monogamy, and cast doubt on whether the human version plays an analogous role.[5] Physiologically, pair-bonding behavior has been shown to be connected to vasopressin, dopamine, and oxytocin levels, with the genetic influence apparently arising via the number of receptors for these substances in the brain; the pair-bonding behavior has also been shown in experiments to be strongly modifiable by administering some of these substances directly.

Voles have a number of unusual chromosomal traits. Species have been found with 17 to 64 chromosomes. In some species, males and females have different chromosome numbers, a trait unusual in mammals, though it is seen in other organisms. Additionally, genetic material typically found on the Y chromosome has been found in both males and females in at least one species. In another species, the X chromosome contains 20% of the genome. All of these variations result in very little physical aberration; most vole species are virtually indistinguishable.[6]

Mating system

Voles may be either monogamous or polygamous, which leads to differing patterns of mate choice and parental care. Environmental conditions play a large part in dictating which system is active in a given population. Voles live in colonies due to the young remaining in the family group for relatively long periods.[7] In the genus Microtus, monogamy is preferred when resources are spatially homogenous and population densities are low and where the opposite of both conditions are realized polygamous tendencies arise.[8] Vole mating systems are also sensitive to the operational sex ratio and tend toward monogamy when males and females are present in equal numbers. Where one sex is more numerous than the other, polygamy is more likely.[9] However the most marked effect on mating system is population density and these effects can take place both inter and intra-specifically[8]

Male voles are territorial and tend to include territories of several female voles when possible. Under these conditions polyandry exists and males offer little parental care.[10] Males mark and aggressively defend their territories since females prefer males with the most recent marking in a given area.[11]

Voles prefer familiar mates through olfactory sensory exploitation. Monogamous voles prefer males who have yet to mate, while non-monogamous voles do not.[12] Mate preference in voles develops through cohabitation in as little as 24 hours.[11] This drives young male voles to show non-limiting preference toward female siblings. This is not inclusive to females' preference for males which may help to explain the absence of interbreeding indicators.

Although females show little territoriality, under pair bonding conditions they tend to show aggression toward other female voles.[12] This behavior is flexible as some Microtus females share dens during the winter months, perhaps to conserve heat and energy.[13] Populations which are monogamous show relatively minor size differences between genders compared with those using polygamous systems.[14]

The grey-sided vole (Myodes rufocanus) exhibits male-biased dispersal as a means of avoiding incestuous matings.[15] Among those matings that involve inbreeding, the number of weaned juveniles in litters is significantly fewer than that from noninbred litters, due to inbreeding depression.

Brandt’s vole (Lasiopodomys brandtii) lives in groups that mainly consist of close relatives. However, they show no sign of inbreeding.[16] The mating system of these voles involves a type of polygyny for males and extra-group polyandry for females. This system increases the frequency of mating among distantly related individuals, and is achieved mainly by dispersal during the mating season.[16] Such a strategy is likely an adaptation to avoid the inbreeding depression that would be caused by expression of deleterious recessive alleles if close relatives mated.

Empathy and consolation

A 2016 study into the behavior of voles, Microtus ochrogaster specifically, found that voles comfort each other when mistreated, spending more time grooming a mistreated vole. Voles that were not mistreated had levels of stress-hormones that were similar to the voles that had been mistreated, suggesting that the voles were capable of empathizing with each other. This was further proven by blocking the vole's receptors for oxytocin, a hormone involved in empathy. When the oxytocin receptors were blocked this behavior stopped.[17]

This type of empathetic behavior has previously been thought to only occur in animals with advanced cognition, such as humans, apes, and elephants.

Vole clock
Main article: Vole clock

The vole clock is a method of dating archaeological strata using vole teeth.[18]

Classification
gollark: What of the median Zirconium enjoyer?
gollark: Can Rust even represent lenses without HKTs?
gollark: That was misscheduled, you bee.
gollark: Hmm, I somehow failed to notice, but my laptop's WiFi card somehow ceased to exist.
gollark: It's not like collections of bee neurons emulating human minds aren't "real people".

References
  1. Dickman, Chris R. "Rodent–Ecosystem Relationships: a Review" in Singleton G, Hinds L, Leirs H, Zhang Z. ed. 1999. "Ecologically-based management of rodent pests". ACIAR Monograph No. 59, 494p Retrieved on 2018-03-28
  2. Daar, Sheila (December 1997). "How to Control Voles in Your Garden". VegetableGardener.com. Taunton Press. Retrieved 14 October 2011.
  3. Lim, Miranda M.; Wang, Zuoxin; Olazábal, Daniel E.; Ren, Xianghui; Terwilliger, Ernest F.; Young, Larry J. (2004). "Enhanced partner preference in a promiscuous species by manipulating the expression of a single gene". Nature. 429 (6993): 754–7. Bibcode:2004Natur.429..754L. doi:10.1038/nature02539. PMID 15201909. Referenced in Graham, Sarah (2004-06-17). "Gene Linked to Lasting Love in Voles". Scientific American.
  4. Hammock, E. A. D.; Young, LJ (2005). "Microsatellite Instability Generates Diversity in Brain and Sociobehavioral Traits". Science. 308 (5728): 1630–4. Bibcode:2005Sci...308.1630H. doi:10.1126/science.1111427. PMID 15947188. Summarized in Wade, Nicholas (2005-06-10). "DNA of Voles May Hint at Why Some Fathers Shirk Duties". The New York Times. Retrieved November 17, 2017.
  5. Fink, S. (2006). "Mammalian monogamy is not controlled by a single gene". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 103 (29): 10956–10960. Bibcode:2006PNAS..10310956F. doi:10.1073/pnas.0602380103. PMC 1544156. PMID 16832060.
  6. DeWoody, J. Andrew; Triant, Deb; Main, Douglas M. (2006-09-14). "Rodent's bizarre traits deepen mystery of genetics, evolution". Purdue.edu. Purdue University. Retrieved February 25, 2007.
  7. Potapov. M. Zadubrovskaya, I. Zabudrovskii, P. Potapova, O. Eviskov, V. 2011. Mating Systems in the Steppe Lemming (Lagurus lagurus) and Narrow-Skulled Vole (Microtus gregalis) From the Northern Kulunda Steppe. Russian Journal of Ecology. 43(1): 40-44.
  8. Streatfeild, C. Mabry, K. Keane, B. Crist, T. Solomon, N. 2011. Intraspecific Variabilityin the Social and Gentetic Mating System of Prairie Voles, Microtus ochrogaster. Animal Behaviour. 82(6): 1387-1398.
  9. Zhang, J. Zhang, Z. 2003. Influence of Operational Sex Ratio and Density on the Copulatory Behaviour and Mating System of Brandt’s Vole Microtus brandt. Acta Theriologica. 48(3): 335-346.
  10. Ostfeld, R. 1986. Territoriality and Mating System of California Voles. Journal of Animal Ecology. 55: 691-706.
  11. Parker, K. Phillips, K. Lee, T. 2001. Development of Selective Partner Preferences in Captive Male and Female Meadow Voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus. Animal Behavior. 61: 1217-1226.
  12. Salo, A. Dewsbury, D. 1995. Three Experiments on Mate Choice in Meadow Voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus). Journal of Comparative Psychology. 109(1): 42-46.
  13. Lambin, X. Krebs, C. Scott, B. 1992. Spacing Systems of the Tundra Vole (Microtus oeconomus) During the Breeding Season in Canada’s Western Arctic. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 70: 2068-2072.
  14. Lee, C. Chui, C. Lin, L. Lin, Y. 2014. Partner Preference and Mating System of the Taiwan Field Vole (Microtus kikuchii). Taiwania, 59(2): 127-138.
  15. Ishibashi Y, Saitoh T (2008). "Role of male-biased dispersal in inbreeding avoidance in the grey-sided vole (Myodes rufocanus)". Mol. Ecol. 17 (22): 4887–96. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03969.x. PMID 19140979.
  16. Liu XH, Yue LF, Wang da W, Li N, Cong L (2013). "Inbreeding avoidance drives consistent variation of fine-scale genetic structure caused by dispersal in the seasonal mating system of Brandt's voles". PLOS ONE. 8 (3): e58101. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...858101L. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0058101. PMC 3597616. PMID 23516435.
  17. "Animal behaviour: Voles console stressed friends". Nature. 529 (7587): 441. 2016-01-28. Bibcode:2016Natur.529T.441.. doi:10.1038/529441d. ISSN 0028-0836.
  18. Currant, Andy (Natural History Museum, London) (2000). "2000 series: Elveden, Suffolk". Time Team. Channel 4. Archived from the original on 2008-01-17. Retrieved 31 May 2014.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.