Tusk shell

The tusk shells or tooth shells, often referred to by the more-technical term scaphopods /ˈskæfəˌpɒd/ (From Ancient Greek, σκᾰ́φης (skáphē) "boat", and πούς (poús) "foot"), are members of a class of shelled marine mollusc with worldwide distribution, and are the only class of exclusively infaunal marine molluscs. Shells of species within this class range from about 0.5 to 15 cm in length. Members of the order Dentaliida tend to be significantly larger than those of the order Gadilida.

Tusk shells
Temporal range: Mississippian–Recent[1][2]
A shell of the scaphopod Antalis vulgaris from France
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Mollusca
Class: Scaphopoda
Bronn, 1862
Orders
Part of a series on
Seashells
Mollusc shells
About mollusc shells
Other seashells
Dentalium octangulatum
Fossil of Entalis laevis.
Tusk shell necklace from Bronze Age (MHNT).

These molluscs live in soft substrates offshore (usually not intertidally). Because of this subtidal habitat and the small size of most species, many beachcombers are unfamiliar with them; their shells are not as common or as easily visible in the beach drift as the shells of sea snails and clams.

Molecular data suggest that the scaphopods are a sister group to the cephalopods, although higher-level molluscan phylogeny remains somewhat unresolved.[3]

Orientation

The morphological shape of the scaphopod body makes it difficult to orient it satisfactorily. As a result, researchers have often disagreed as to which direction is anterior/ posterior and which is ventral/ dorsal. According to Shimek and Steiner, "[t]he apex of the shell and mantle are anatomically dorsal, and the large aperture is ventral and anterior. Consequently, the concave side of the shell and viscera are anatomically dorsal. The convex side has to be divided into anteriorly ventral and dorsally posterior portions, with the anus as the demarcation. Functionally, as in cephalopods, the large aperture with the foot is anterior, the apical area posterior, the concave side dorsal and the convex side ventral."[4]

Anatomical diagram of Rhabdus rectius

Anatomy

The shells of the members of the Gadilida are usually glassy-smooth in addition to being quite narrow and with a reduced aperture. This along with other structures of their anatomy allows them to move with surprising speed through loose sediment to escape potential bottom-dwelling predators. The Dentalids, on the other hand, tend to have strongly ribbed and often rather rough shells. When they sense vibrations anywhere around them, their defensive response is to freeze. This makes them harder to detect by animals such as ratfish which can sense the electrical signals given off by the most minute muscle movement.

The mantle of a scaphopod is entirely within the shell. The foot extends from the larger end of the shell, and is used to burrow through the substrate. The scaphopod positions itself head down in the substrate, with the apical end of the shell (at the rear of the animal's body) projecting upward. This end seldom appears above the level of the substrate, however, as doing so exposes the animal to numerous predators. Most adult scaphopods live their lives entirely buried within the substrate.

Water enters the mantle cavity through the apical aperture, and is wafted along the body surface by cilia. There are no gills; the entire surface of the mantle cavity absorbs oxygen from the water. Unlike most other molluscs, there is no continuous flow of water with a separate exhalant stream. Instead, deoxygenated water is expelled rapidly back through the apical aperture through muscular action once every ten to twelve minutes.

A number of minute tentacles around the foot, called captacula, sift through the sediment and latch onto bits of food, which they then convey to the mouth. The mouth has a grinding radula that breaks the bit into smaller pieces for digestion. The radulae and cartilaginous oral bolsters of the Gadilidae are structured like zippers where the teeth actively crush the prey by opening and closing on it repeatedly, while the radulae and bolsters of the Dentaliidae work rachet-like to pull the prey into the esophagus, sometimes whole. The massive radula of the scaphopods is the largest such organ relative to body size of any mollusc (among whom, except for the bivalves, the presence of a which is a defining characteristic). The remainder of the digestive system consists of a digestive diverticulum, esophagus, stomach, and intestine. A digestive gland secretes enzymes into the stomach, but, unlike some other molluscs, does not digest the food directly itself. The anus opens on the ventral/ underside of the animal, roughly in the middle of the mantle cavity.

The scaphopod vascular system is rudimentary lacking heart auricles as well as corresponding ctenidia (gills) and blood vessels; the blood is held in sinuses throughout the body cavity, and is pumped through the body by the rhythmic action of the foot. The heart, a characteristic feature of all other groups of mollusca, has been considered totally lost or reduced to a thin fold of the pericardium; however, according to more recent studies, the muscular, regularly beating perianal blood sinus is homologous to the ventricle and is therefore considered the scaphopod heart.[5] Metabolic waste is excreted through a pair of nephridia close to the anus. The tusk shells appear to be the only extant molluscs which completely lack the otherwise standard molluscan reno-pericardial apertures. Furthermore, they also appear to be the only molluscs with openings that directly connect the hemocoel with the surrounding water (through two "water pores" located near the nephridial openings). These openings may serve to allow the animal to relieve internal pressure by ejecting body fluid (blood) during moments of extreme muscular contraction of the foot.[6]

The nervous system is generally similar to that of cephalopods.[7] One pair each of cerebral and pleural ganglia lie close to the oesophagus, and effectively form the animal's brain. A separate set of pedal ganglia lie in the foot, and a pair of visceral ganglia are set further back in the body, and connect to pavilion ganglia via long connectives. Radular and sub-radular ganglia are also present, as are statocysts with staticonia. Scaphopods have no eyes, no osphradia,[8] or other distinct sensory organs.[9] However, scaphopods do possess genes involved in photoreceptor formation and function implying scaphopods may have had eyes that degenerated over evolutionary time.[10]

Reproduction and development

Scaphopods have separate sexes, and external fertilisation. They have a single gonad occupying much of the posterior part of the body, and shed their gametes into the water through the nephridium.

Once fertilized, the eggs hatch into a free-living trochophore larva, which develops into a veliger larva that more closely resembles the adult, but lacks the extreme elongation of the adult body.[9] The three-lobed foot originates prior to metamorphosis while the cephalic tentacles develop post metamorphosis. Scaphopods remain univalved throughout their morphogenesis contrary to bivalves.[11]

Ecology

Tusk shells live in seafloor sediment, feeding primarily on foraminiferans; some supplement this with vegetable matter.[12]

Classification

The group is composed of two subtaxa, the Dentaliida (which may be paraphyletic) and the monophyletic Gadilida.[1] The differences between the two orders is subtle and hinges on size and on details of the radula, shell, and foot. Specifically, the Dentaliids are the physically larger of the two families, and possess a shell that tapers uniformly from anterior (widest) to posterior (narrowest); they also have a foot which consists of one central and two lateral lobes and which bends into the shell when retracted. The Gadilids, on the other hand, are much smaller, have a shell whose widest portion is slightly posterior to its aperture, and have a foot which is disk-like and fringed with tentacles which inverts into itself when retracted (in this state resembling a pucker rather than a disk).

Shell of Calliodentalium semitracheatum (Boissevain, 1906) (specimen at MNHN, Paris)

According to the World Register of Marine Species:

  • Dentaliida da Costa, 1776
    • family Anulidentaliidae Chistikov, 1975 – 3 genera
    • family Calliodentaliidae – 1 genus
    • family Dentaliidae Children, 1834 – 14 genera
    • family Fustiariidae Steiner, 1991 – 1 genus
    • family Gadilinidae Chistikov, 1975 – 2 genera
    • family Laevidentaliidae Palmer, 1974 – 1 genus
    • family Omniglyptidae Chistikov, 1975 – 1 genus
    • family Rhabdidae Chistikov, 1975 – 1 genus
  • Gadilida Starobogatov, 1974
    • sub-order Entalimorpha Steiner, 1992
    • sub-order Gadilimorpha Steiner, 1992
      • family Gadilidae Stoliczka, 1868 – 8 genera
      • family Pulsellidae Scarabino in Boss, 1982 – 3 genera
      • family Wemersoniellidae Scarabino, 1986 – 2 genera

Evolution

Fossil record

There is a good fossil record of scaphopods from the Mississippian onwards,[13] making them the youngest molluscan class.

The Ordovician Rhytiodentalium kentuckyensis has been interpreted as an early antecedent of the scaphopods, implying an evolutionary succession from ribeirioid rostroconch molluscs such as Pinnocaris. However, a competing hypothesis suggests a Devonian/Carboniferous origin from a non-mineralized ancestor, or from a more derived, Devonian, conocardioid rostroconch.[14]

Phylogeny

The scaphopods are largely agreed to be members of the Conchifera, however their phylogenetic relationship with the other members of this subphylum remains contentious. The Diasoma concept proposes a clade of scaphopods and bivalves based on their shared infaunal lifestyle, burrowing foot, and possession of a mantle and shell. Pojeta and Runnegar proposed the extinct Rostroconchia as the stem group of the Diasoma.[15] An alternative hypothesis proposes the cephalopods and gastropods as sister to the scaphopods with helcionellids as the stem group.[16] A review of deep molluscan phylogeny in 2014 found more support for the scaphopods, gastropods, or cephalopods than for scaphopods and bivalves, thus the shared body features of scaphopods and bivalves may be convergent adaptations due to similar lifestyles.[17] Analysis of the scaphopod nervous system demonstrated that both scaphopods and cephalopods share a similar nervous system structure, with ventrally shifted pedal nerves and lateral nerves that extend dorsally. These similarities led to the conclusion that scaphopods are sister to the cephalopods with gastropods as sister to them both.[7]

Human use

The shells of Dentalium hexagonum and Dentalium pretiosum were strung on thread and used by the natives of the Pacific Northwest as shell money. Dentalium shells were also used to make belts and headdresses by the Natufian culture of the Middle East, and are a possible indicator of early social stratification.[18]

gollark: The models got wrecked by Eliera (can't spell it) having strange downward gravity.
gollark: Planets are quite big.
gollark: I really doubt it.
gollark: Such as, I don't know, venting the mantle to the surface.
gollark: That would ruin the climate first, ecosystem second, and only if you did horrendous amounts of it.

References
  1. Steiner, G. . (1992). "Phylogeny and Classification of Scaphopoda". Journal of Molluscan Studies. 58 (4): 385–400. doi:10.1093/mollus/58.4.385.
  2. Reynolds, Patrick D. (2002). "The Scaphopoda". Molluscan Radiation - Lesser-known Branches. Advances in Marine Biology. 42. pp. 137–236. doi:10.1016/S0065-2881(02)42014-7. ISBN 9780120261420. PMID 12094723.
  3. Giribet, G.; Okusu, A, A.; Lindgren, A.R., A. R.; Huff, S.W., S. W.; Schrödl, M, M.; Nishiguchi, M.K., M. K. (May 2006). "Evidence for a clade composed of molluscs with serially repeated structures: monoplacophorans are related to chitons". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 103 (20): 7723–7728. Bibcode:2006PNAS..103.7723G. doi:10.1073/pnas.0602578103. PMC 1472512. PMID 16675549.
  4. Shimek, Ronald; Steiner, Gerhard (1997). "Chapter 6". Microscopic anatomy of invertebrates. Volume 6B: Mollusca II. Wiley-Liss, Inc. p. 719.
  5. Patrick D. Reynolds. Scaphopoda: The Tusk Shells. In: Charles F. Sturm, Timothy A. Pearce, Ángel Valdés. The Mollusks: A Guide to Their Study, Collection, and Preservation. Boca Ratón: Universal Publishers, 2006. pp. 229-238, here: p. 231.
  6. D.R. Khanna; P. R. Yadav (1 January 2004). Biology of Mollusca. Discovery. p. 198. ISBN 978-81-7141-898-5.
  7. Sumner-Rooney, Lauren H.; Schrödl, Michael; Lodde-Bensch, Eva; Lindberg, David R.; Heß, Martin; Brennan, Gerard P.; Sigwart, Julia D. (2015). "A neurophylogenetic approach provides new insight to the evolution of Scaphopoda: A neurophylogenetic approach in Scaphopoda". Evolution & Development. 17 (6): 337–346. doi:10.1111/ede.12164. PMID 26487042.
  8. Charles F. Sturm; Timothy A. Pearce; Ángel Valdés (2006). The Mollusks: A Guide to Their Study, Collection, and Preservation. Universal. p. 2. ISBN 978-1-58112-930-4.
  9. Barnes, Robert D. (1982). Invertebrate Zoology. Philadelphia, PA: Holt-Saunders International. pp. 432–434. ISBN 0-03-056747-5.
  10. Wollesen, Tim; McDougall, Carmel; Arendt, Detlev (2019-10-19). "Remnants of ancestral larval eyes in an eyeless mollusk? Molecular characterization of photoreceptors in the scaphopod Antalis entalis". EvoDevo. 10 (1): 25. doi:10.1186/s13227-019-0140-7. ISSN 2041-9139. PMC 6800502. PMID 31641428.
  11. Wanninger, Andreas; Haszprunar, Gerhard (2001). "The expression of an engrailed protein during embryonic shell formation of the tusk-shell, Antalis entalis (Mollusca, Scaphopoda)". Evolution & Development. 3 (5): 312–321. doi:10.1046/j.1525-142X.2001.01034.x. ISSN 1525-142X. PMID 11710763.
  12. Guralnick, R.; Smith, K. (1999). "Historical and biomechanical analysis of integration and dissociation in molluscan feeding, with special emphasis on the true limpets (Patellogastropoda: Gastropoda)". Journal of Morphology. 241 (2): 175–195. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4687(199908)241:2<175::AID-JMOR7>3.0.CO;2-0. PMID 10420163.
  13. Ellis L. Yochelson; Royal H. Mapes; Doris Heidelberger (2007). "An enigmatic molluscan fossil from the Devonian of Germany: scaphopod or cephalopod?". Paläontologische Zeitschrift. 81 (2): 118–122. doi:10.1007/BF02988386.
  14. Peel, J.S. (2004). "Pinnocaris and the origin of scaphopods". Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 49 (4): 543–550.
  15. Pojeta Jr., John; Runnegar, Bruce (1976). "The paleontology of rostroconch mollusks and the early history of the phylum Mollusca". Professional Paper. doi:10.3133/pp968 https://semanticscholar.org/paper/46b38d845fc41d7fb38054d063e79aafe6f21871. Missing or empty |title= (help)
  16. Stöger, I.; Sigwart, J. D.; Kano, Y.; Knebelsberger, T.; Marshall, B. A.; Schwabe, E.; Schrödl, M. (2013). "The Continuing Debate on Deep Molluscan Phylogeny: Evidence for Serialia (Mollusca, Monoplacophora + Polyplacophora)". BioMed Research International. 2013: 407072. doi:10.1155/2013/407072. ISSN 2314-6133. PMC 3856133. PMID 24350268.
  17. Schrödl, Michael; Stöger, Isabella (2014-12-25). "A review on deep molluscan phylogeny: old markers, integrative approaches, persistent problems". Journal of Natural History. 48 (45–48): 2773–2804. doi:10.1080/00222933.2014.963184. ISSN 0022-2933.
  18. Crabtree, Pam J.; Campana, Douglas V., eds. (2005-06-21). Exploring Prehistory: How Archaeology Reveals Our Past (2nd ed.). p. 233. ISBN 0-07-297814-7.

Further reading
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.