Shackleton Limestone

The Shackleton Limestone is a Cambrian limestone formation of the Byrd Group of Antarctica. The age of the formation is established to be Cambrian Stage 3, dated at ranging from 520 to 516 Ma. This period correlates with the End-Botomian mass extinction. Fossils of trilobites and Marocella mira and Dailyatia have been found in the formation, named after Ernest Shackleton, who led a failed expedition into Antarctica. At time of deposition, the Antarctic Plate has been established to be just south of the equator as part of the supercontinent Pannotia, contrasting with its present position at 82 degrees southern latitude.[1]

Shackleton Formation
Stratigraphic range: Cambrian Stage 3
~520–516 Ma
Shackleton Limestone (Antarctica)
TypeGeological formation
Unit ofByrd Group
UnderliesStarshot Formation
OverliesGoldie Formation
Lithology
PrimaryLimestone, marble, sandstone
OtherQuartzite, conglomerate, shale, dolomite
Location
Coordinates82.2°S 160.3°W / -82.2; -160.3
Approximate paleocoordinates0.7°S 155.4°W / -0.7; -155.4
RegionChurchill Mountains of Antarctica
Type section
Named forErnest Shackleton
Named byLaird
Year defined1963

Paleogeography of the Cambrian with the supercontinent Pannotia and Antarctica south of the paleo-equator

Geology

The formation, named by Laird in 1963, crops out in the Churchill Mountains, part of the Transantarctic Mountains of southwestern Antarctica. The most complete exposures are in the Holyoake Range.[2] Paleontological data and carbon isotope stratigraphy indicate that the Shackleton Limestone ranges from lower Atdabanian through upper Botomian. The formation is a thick carbonate deposit with a lower unit of unfossiliferous interbedded quartzite and limestone, overlies the Late Proterozoic argillaceous turbidite Goldie Formation and underlies the Starshot Formation.[2][3] Other lithologies noted in the Shackleton Limestone are marble with breccia, conglomerate, sandstone and shale.[4] The abrupt transition from the Shackleton Limestone to a large-scale, upward coarsening siliciclastic succession records deepening of the outer platform and then deposition of an eastward-prograding molassic wedge. The various formations of the upper Byrd Group show general stratigraphic and age equivalence, such that coarse-grained alluvial fan deposits of the Douglas Conglomerate are proximal equivalents of the marginal-marine to shelf deposits of the Starshot Formation.[5]

The sandstone-rich lower member of the Shackleton Limestone is exposed at Cotton Plateau beneath Panorama Point, where it consists of up to 133 metres (436 ft) of interbedded white- to cream-weathering, vitreous, quartz sandstone and brown-weathering, white, fine-grained dolomitic grainstone. These beds are in fault contact with the adjacent Goldie Formation.[6] The formation postdates the Beardmore Orogeny of the Neoproterozoic,[7] and was deformed by the Ross Orogeny.[8]

Fossil content

The formation has provided fossils of trilobites such as Holyoakia granulosa, Pagetides (Discomesites) spinosus, Lemdadella antarcticae, Kingaspis (?) convexus, Yunnanocephalus longioccipitalis, and Onchocephalina (?) spinosa.[9] Other fossils found are Marocella mira,[1] and Dailyatia odyssei and D. braddocki.[10]

gollark: Your first idea isn't very descriptive, and the second would probably be done better with unique per-message IDs, but problem is that it results in more messages being sent than is necessary.
gollark: I've decided to actually start implementing skynet server peering. Anyone got suggestions for how to stop message loops?
gollark: I found it while looking for undestroyed spawners.
gollark: Er, yes, you do.
gollark: <@128499361289207808> Same offer for your claimed spawner.

See also

References

  1. Shackleton Limestone at Fossilworks.org
  2. Myrow et al., 2002, p.1073
  3. Rowell, A.J.; Rees, M.N. (1991). Thomson, M.R.A.; Crame, J.A.; Thomson, J.W. (eds.). Setting and significance of the Shackleton Limestone, central Transantarctic Mountains, in Geological Evolution of Antarctica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 171–175. ISBN 9780521372664.
  4. Laird et al., 1971, p.428
  5. Myrow et al., 2002, p.1070
  6. Myrow et al., 2002, p.1075
  7. Elliot, 1975, p.54
  8. Stump et al., 2006, p.2
  9. Palmer & Rowell, 1995
  10. Skovsted, 2015, p.16

Bibliography

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.