Sérandon
Sérandon is a commune in the Corrèze department in central France.
Sérandon | |
|---|---|
 The Dordogne from Gratte Bruyère viewpoint | |
.svg.png) Coat of arms | |
Location of Sérandon 
| |
  Sérandon  Sérandon | |
| Coordinates: 45°21′37″N 2°20′15″E | |
| Country | France |
| Region | Nouvelle-Aquitaine |
| Department | Corrèze |
| Arrondissement | Ussel |
| Canton | Haute-Dordogne |
| Intercommunality | Haute-Corrèze Communauté |
| Government | |
| • Mayor (2020–2026) | Pierre Mathes |
| Area 1 | 34.48 km2 (13.31 sq mi) |
| Population (2017-01-01)[1] | 349 |
| • Density | 10/km2 (26/sq mi) |
| Time zone | UTC+01:00 (CET) |
| • Summer (DST) | UTC+02:00 (CEST) |
| INSEE/Postal code | 19256 /19160 |
| 1 French Land Register data, which excludes lakes, ponds, glaciers > 1 km2 (0.386 sq mi or 247 acres) and river estuaries. | |
Geography
The Triouzoune forms the commune's western boundary, then flows into the Dordogne, which forms the commune's southeastern and eastern boundaries.
Population
| Year | Pop. | ±% |
|---|---|---|
| 1962 | 560 | — |
| 1968 | 507 | −9.5% |
| 1975 | 448 | −11.6% |
| 1982 | 379 | −15.4% |
| 1990 | 342 | −9.8% |
| 1999 | 332 | −2.9% |
| 2008 | 349 | +5.1% |
gollark: The Chinese remainder theorem?
gollark: Immediately undergo exponentiation modulo 7, then.
gollark: I do not understand that sentence ("The alternative is work a political method for political reason.") and it is not pizza, I have had no commercial relations with pizza companies, I am not paid to subliminally advertise pizza, etc.
gollark: I guess maybe in politics/economics/sociology the alternative is something like "lean on human intuition" or "make the correct behaviour magically resolve from self-interest". Not sure how well those actually work.
gollark: - the replication crisis does exist, but it's not like *every paper* has a 50% chance of being wrong - it's mostly in some fields and you can generally estimate which things won't replicate fairly well without much specialized knowledge- science™ agrees on lots of things, just not some highly politicized things- you *can* do RCTs and correlation studies and such, which they seem to be ignoring- some objectivity is better than none- sure, much of pop science is not great, but that doesn't invalidate... all science- they complain about running things based on "trial and error and guesswork", but then don't offer any alternative
See also
References
- "Populations légales 2017". INSEE. Retrieved 6 January 2020.
 |
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Sérandon. |
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.