Political views of Richard Dawkins

Richard Dawkins is an English ethologist, evolutionary biologist, and writer. Dawkins himself has stated that his political views are left-leaning.[1] However, many of Dawkins's political statements have created controversy among left-wing and atheist communities.

Richard Dawkins in 2006.

Political affiliation

Labour Party

Before the mid-2000s, Dawkins usually voted for Labour Party candidates.[2] The party has often been described as social democratic.[3][4]

In 2009 Dawkins participated in a New Statesman project called "20 ways to save Labour", in which 20 public figures, including Dawkins as well as Germaine Greer and John Pilger, among others gave suggestions about how to make the Labour Party better. Dawkins's contribution was as follows:

Stop toadying to Muslims and other "faith communities" as part of a general abolition of all religious privilege. Withdraw government support from schools that abuse children by teaching them they belong to a particular religion (as opposed to teaching them about religions and letting them make up their own minds when they are old enough). Abolish the automatic right of religious organizations to charitable status, and the automatic right of bishops to sit in the House of Lords.[5]

Liberal Democrats

Starting in the mid-2000s, Dawkins has also voted and expressed support for the Liberal Democrats.[2] Dawkins spoke at the party's conference in 2009 and publicly expressed his support then.[6] At the conference, Dawkins strongly criticised the English libel laws, and the party revised its policy on the issue at the same conference.[7] Dawkins also called for an alliance of all Liberal Democrats based on an agreement on electoral reform.[8]

Social views

Free expression

Dawkins has argued for reform to the English defamation law, arguing that Simon Singh should have the right to criticise scientific claims made by the British Chiropractic Association.[9] In 2009, he said "I and many of my colleagues fear that if Simon loses it will have major implications on the freedom of scientists, researchers and other commentators to engage in robust criticism of scientific and pseudo-scientific work."[10] The Defamation Act 2013 substantially reformed the law.

In 2008, Dawkins pointed out major factual errors in The Atlas of Creation, such as images of fishing lures mislabeled as insects,[11][12] and subsequently his website has been banned in Turkey[13][14][15] and Pakistan.[16][17] Dawkins gave a speech at the 2012 Jaipur Literature Festival where a video link with Salman Rushdie was cancelled due to ongoing controversy over the Rushdie affair.[18][19][20] He has given a high appraisal of Nick Cohen's book You Can't Read this Book, arguing that libel laws create a culture of "tacit censorship" in liberal democracies.[21]

In 2009, Dawkins agreed to give a talk at the University of Oklahoma, and the Oklahoma House of Representatives introduced bills attacking him, declaring that his views on evolution are "contrary and offensive to the views and opinions of most citizens of Oklahoma."[22][23] In his speech, the professor argued that "what's really offensive is the bizarre idea that a state university should only ever hear opinions that its citizens agree with. If that principle is ever accepted you can kiss goodbye anything that a university stands for. What on earth is a university for if it only reinforces opinions that students and the public already hold?"[24][25] Dawkins has argued against campaigns by far-left groups on university campuses to have speeches by internationally renown figures cancelled.[26] In a 2015 interview, Dawkins said "If you only ever get exposed to ideas you agree with, what kind of university would that be?"[27] He has argued against campaigns to block speakers like Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Bill Maher, Maryam Namazie and Germaine Greer.[28][29][30][31]

Dawkins expressed solidarity with Stephen Fry after Irish police investigated Fry over blasphemy allegations. Dawkins quoted his book, The God Delusion in The Irish Times: “The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully.” Dawkins added that he would be in Ireland on 12 June 2017 and challenged the Irish police to arrest him. Dawkins added in Twitter: “The Irish blasphemy law must go. An embarrassment to the civilised world, it encourages the uncivilised one.”[32]

Feminism and women's rights

Dawkins has said that feminism is "enormously important" and "a political movement that deserves to be supported".[33] Dawkins also released a joint statement with Ophelia Benson that condemned "death threats, rape threats, attacks on people's appearance, age, race, sex, size, haircut…[and] vulgar epithets."[34] In a passage in The God Delusion, Dawkins wrote about how he wished to mirror the successes of feminism in the atheist movement.

However, Dawkins has come under fire from feminists and feminist organizations for many reasons. Several of Dawkins's posts on Twitter were controversial, such as one where he seemed to victim blame the victims of rape when they are drunk. "If you want to be in a position to testify & jail a man, don't get drunk," he tweeted.[35] Amanda Marcotte, in Salon, criticized Dawkins by saying that "For someone who is a supposed rationalist, Dawkins refused to even acknowledge the basic difference between making the choice to break the law and being the victim of a crime."[35] Dawkins was also the subject of controversy when he tweeted, "Date rape is bad. Stranger rape at knifepoint is worse. If you think that's an endorsement of date rape, go away and learn how to think."[36] Amanda Marcotte heavily criticized him by saying that "He made a pretty serious logical error…He assumed that the amount of pain that a victim of injustice suffers is directly proportional to the contemporary social norms surrounding it, i.e. if a form of abuse was considered no big deal to most people in a society, the people directly victimized would also feel that way."[37]

In January 2016, Dawkins tweeted a link to a cartoon caricature of feminists and Islamists. Dawkins later deleted the tweet when he realized it mocked real people.[38] Organizers of the 2016 Northeast Conference on Science and Skepticism unilaterally declared his tweet "very offensive" and disinvited him without speaking to him.[39] They later spoke to Dawkins on the phone, and apologised for disinviting him, and re-invited him.[40]

Rebecca Watson incident
Rebecca Watson in 2009.

Dawkins was denounced for his comments about a video blog post by atheist blogger and writer Rebecca Watson. The scandal resulting from his comments was called "Elevatorgate".[41] The controversy started at an atheist convention in Dublin, where Rebecca Watson spoke about feminism and the atheist movement. That night, when Watson was in an elevator, she was propositioned by a man, who said "Don't take this the wrong way, but I find you very interesting, and I would like to talk more. Would you like to come to my hotel room for coffee?" Watson found this extremely inappropriate, and afterwards, she made a video blog saying "guys, don't do that."[42] The comments exploded with divisive opinions, and PZ Myers reacted on his blog Pharyngula.[43] On that post, Dawkins unexpectedly made the following comment in the form of a fictitious letter to a Muslim woman complaining of misogyny:

Dear Muslima

Stop whining, will you. Yes, yes, I know you had your genitals mutilated with a razor blade, and ... yawn ... don't tell me yet again, I know you aren't allowed to drive a car, and you can't leave the house without a male relative, and your husband is allowed to beat you, and you'll be stoned to death if you commit adultery. But stop whining, will you. Think of the suffering your poor American sisters have to put up with.

Only this week I heard of one, she calls herself Skep"chick", and do you know what happened to her? A man in a hotel elevator invited her back to his room for coffee. I am not exaggerating. He really did. He invited her back to his room for coffee. Of course she said no, and of course he didn't lay a finger on her, but even so ...

And you, Muslima, think you have misogyny to complain about! For goodness sake grow up, or at least grow a thicker skin.

Richard [Dawkins][44]

Dawkins was criticized by atheists and others for his remarks.[45] David Allen Green in New Statesman wrote that "One of the many problems here is that Rebecca didn't use her video to downplay the plight of Muslim women from the perspective of an American woman…Just because there is severe misogyny in one context doesn't remove the need to deal rationally and helpfully with its lesser manifestation in other contexts."[44] PZ Myers responded by writing, "This isn't slightly bad. It's very bad. Atheist men are alienating the people we want to work with us on the very same problems…that you cited in your comment."[46]

Dawkins tried to clarify his argument, but this elicited several more negative responses:

The man in the elevator didn't physically touch her, didn't attempt to bar her way out of the elevator, didn't even use foul language at her […] [Rebecca] was probably offended to about the same extent as I am offended if a man gets into an elevator with me chewing gum.[47]

Watson herself issued the following boycott of Dawkins as a response to his posts:

[Richard Dawkins] will no longer be rewarded with my money, my praise, my attention. I will no longer recommend his books to others, buy them as presents, or buy them for my own library. I will not attend his lectures or recommend that others do the same.[48]

As part of a reaction to the controversy, Skepchick writers wrote open letters to Dawkins explaining why they believed his comments were offensive and misguided.[49]

LGBT issues

Dawkins strongly argues for a genetic basis for homosexuality and postulates that the gene was preserved through various social and cultural processes.[50] Dawkins has also stated that homosexuality does not conflict with the evolutionary principle. In a talk at Kennesaw State University, he said that "[Evolution] is the explanation for why we exist. It is not something to guide our lives in our own society. […] What we need is a truly anti-Darwinian society--anti-Darwinian in the sense that we do not wish to live in a society where…the strongest suppress the weak…I want to live in a society where we take care of the sick, take care of the weak, take care of the oppressed."[51]

Abortion

Dawkins has expressed pro-choice views. On March 13, 2013, Dawkins tweeted, "With respect to those meanings of "human" that are relevant to the morality of abortion, any fetus is less human than an adult pig."[52] This statement stirred controversy, with lawyer Wesley J. Smith, a senior fellow at the Discovery Institute's Center on Human Exceptionalism (which advocates the pseudoscientific principle of intelligent design) saying that the statement was "utter nonsense…[Dawkins would] fail high school biology".[52] Dawkins also made a heavily criticized tweet where he stated that it would be immoral not to abort a fetus who had Down syndrome.[53] The Down's Syndrome Association issued a response by saying that "At the Down's syndrome Association, we do not believe Down's syndrome in itself should be a reason for termination, however, we realize that families must make their own choice."[54]

Dawkins later apologized.[55]

Animal rights

Dawkins is a supporter of animal rights. He has stated that he believes many kinds of animals have consciousness. "Consciousness has to be there, hasn't it? It's an evolved, emergent quality of brains. It's very likely that most mammals have consciousness, and probably birds, too."[2] Dawkins has also been a major supporter of the Great Ape Project, a coalition of scientists and others who believe that non-human great apes should have the rights to life, the protection of individual liberty, and the prohibition of torture.[2][56] Dawkins wrote an essay in The Great Ape Project, a book published by supporters of the project in which they expressed their views, along with Jane Goodall, Jared Diamond, and others.[57] A passage from Dawkins's contribution is as follows:

The word 'apes' usually means chimpanzees, gorillas, orang-utans, gibbons and siamangs. We admit that we are like apes, but we seldom realise that we are apes. Our common ancestor with the chimpanzees and gorillas is much more recent than their common ancestor with the Asian apes — the gibbons and orang-utans. There is no natural category that includes chimpanzees, gorillas and orang-utans but excludes humans.[58]

Child sexual abuse
Maryam Namazie, Peter Tatchell and Richard Dawkins, protesting against Pope Benedict XVI's visit to the United Kingdom

In 2010, the Associated Press released a letter sent by Cardinal Ratzinger in 1985 to laicize Father Stephen Kiesle, a priest in Oakland, California.[59] Christopher Hitchens and Richard Dawkins in 2010 publicly called for Ratzinger (then Pope Benedict XVI) to stand trial for failure to report suspected sex crimes to the police.[60][61] Dawkins put £10,000 towards a fund that helped publish Geoffrey Robertson's 2010 book The Case of the Pope: Vatican accountability for human rights abuse which argues that Ratzinger maintained a policy of swearing sex abuse victims to secrecy and moving abusers between parishes until 2002, and that the Vatican is not a sovereign state and the pope is not immune to prosecution.[62][63]

Dawkins suffered what he describes as "thirty seconds" of a "mild feeling-up" by a school teacher when he was "about nine or ten years old".[64][65] In the 2006 book The God Delusion, he discussed the Roman Catholic Church sexual abuse scandal in Ireland, and noted an anecdote from an American woman brought up Catholic that the fear of burning in hell was, in her recollection, greater than the psychological effects of molestation by a priest. Mehdi Hasan criticised his use of anecdotal evidence for the controversial claim in a 2012 Al Jazeera English interview.

In the 2013 book An Appetite for Wonder he penned a paragraph on his recollection of being molested by a teacher, telling friends who the same thing had happened to, and the teacher's suicide.[66] He expressed that public responses to pedophilia in schools had changed between when he was a child and in 2013, due to public attention given to British child abuse scandals. He argued that the sexual abuse he had received was "mild" and that he would not judge his teacher by the "standards of today", for which he was heavily criticised. Dawkins expressed publicly that views in his own autobiography were intended as a reflection of his feelings about his own experiences, and that his comments in his autobiography were not intended to minimise the suffering of other people, and apologised for them. The comments generated controversy, with Peter Watt, the director of child protection at the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, responded by saying that "Mr. Dawkins seems to think that because a crime was committed a long time ago we should judge it in a different way. But we know that the victims of sexual abuse suffer the same effects whether it was 50 years ago or today."[67][68]

Views on religion

Dawkins is a noted critic of religion, atheist, anti-theist, anti-religionist and a secular humanist.[69][70] Dawkins believes that there is a conflict between science and religion and that science prevails in the debate.[71][72] Dawkins also thinks that parents forcing their religion on children is a form of mental child abuse and that religion in general is a form of cultural virus.[73]

Dawkins advocates for what he calls "militant atheism" and believes that atheists should not hide their identities so that they can be better integrated into politics and society.[74] Dawkins has written several books criticizing religion, most notably The God Delusion (2006). Dawkins has written that some of his main points in The God Delusion were that atheists can be happy and moral and that they should not be apologetic about their religious identities.[75]

Christianity

Dawkins has repeatedly criticized Christianity, believing that it has been a negative force throughout history. While he has praised the life of Jesus, he has been critical of the supernatural portions of Christianity and the effect it has on the world. Dawkins has argued that Jesus was a theist because everybody in his time was, and that his ethics should be separated from his theology. "I think we owe Jesus the honour of separating his genuinely original and radical ethics from the supernatural nonsense which he inevitably espoused as a man of his time", while also creating a T-shirt that read "Atheists for Jesus".[76] Dawkins has also said that he is a "secular Christian"—in his words, "in the same sense as secular Jews have a feeling for nostalgia and ceremonies."[77]

However, Dawkins, along with his criticism of Christian fundamentalists, has also criticized moderate Christians for fueling extremists by showing exterior niceness.

What I do think about the difference, and let's leave out Muslims specifically, but the difference between moderate religious people and extremist religious people is that although of course it's only a tiny minority of any sect which is ever going to get violent or horrible, there is a sense in which the moderate nice religious people – nice Christians, nice Muslims – make the world safe for extremists. Because the moderates are so nice we all are brought up with the idea that there's something good about religion and faith. That there's something good about bringing children up to have faith.[78]

Islam
Richard Dawkins at the 35th American Atheists conference (2009).

Dawkins has also been critical of extreme Islam, while also indicating he has no great issue with the adherents of moderate Islam. Due to his views on Islamic extremism, Dawkins declared that "Islam is the greatest force for evil in the world today".[79][80] In response, some commentators have accused Dawkins of Islamophobia.[81][82]

Dawkins has criticized unscientific concepts in Islamic beliefs, such as the idea that an embryo starts as a blob, semen comes from the spine and the sun sets in a marsh.[83][84] Dawkins furthered his criticism, saying moderate Christians and moderate Muslims inadvertently contribute to making the "world safe for extremists", but noted that "It's very important that we should not demonize ordinary, law-abiding, very decent Muslims which of course is the vast majority in this country."[85]

It's tempting to say all religions are bad, and I do say all religions are bad, but it's a worse temptation to say all religions are equally bad because they're not. If you look at the actual impact that different religions have on the world it's quite apparent that at present the most evil religion in the world has to be Islam. It's terribly important to modify that because of course that doesn't mean all Muslims are evil, very far from it. Individual Muslims suffer more from Islam than anyone else. They suffer from the homophobia, the misogyny, the joylessness which is preached by extreme Islam, Isis and the Iranian regime. So it is a major evil in the world, we do have to combat it, but we don't do what Trump did and say all Muslims should be shut out of the country. That's draconian, that's illiberal, inhumane and wicked. I am against Islam not least because of the unpleasant effects it has on the lives of Muslims.[86]

In July 2017, Berkeley radio station KPFA cancelled a scheduled book event with Dawkins, after listeners called to complain about such comments, citing a 2013 tweet in which he called Islam "the greatest force for evil in the world today".[87][88][89] Dawkins called the cancellation "truly astonishing", stating he had "never used abusive speech against Islam", but had criticized the "oppressive cruelties of Islamism".[90] KPFA has since invited Dawkins to discuss his views on KPFA's airwaves.[91]

Dawkins said that Islam is not the main problem behind the actions of ISIS: "Religion itself is not responsible for this… It's also this feeling of political involvement."[92] Dawkins has also described Islam as more problematic than Christianity:

There is a belief that every word of the Koran is literally true, and there's a kind of close-mindedness which is, I think, less present in the former Christendom…There are people in the Islamic world who simply say, 'Islam is right, and we are going to impose our will.' There's an asymmetry…I think that it's possible to be naively optimistic, and if you reach out to people who have absolutely no intention of reaching back to you, then you may be disillusioned."[93]

Dawkins has generated controversy on Twitter when he wrote, "All the world's Muslims have fewer Nobel Prizes than Trinity College, Cambridge. They did great things in the Middle Ages, though."[94] After receiving criticism for that, he tweeted in response, "Something you can convert to is not a race. A statement of simple fact is not bigotry. And science by Muslims was great in the distant past. Interesting concept: a simple statement of undeniable FACT can be offensive. Other examples where facts should be hidden because offensive?" Earlier that year, he also wrote, "Of course you can have an opinion about Islam without having read Qur'an. You don't have to read Mein Kampf to have an opinion about Nazism."[95] Among the critics of these comments were Channel 4 economics editor Faisal Islam, who said, "I thought scientists were meant to upbraid journalists for use of spurious data points to 'prove' existing prejudgements,"[96] and columnist Tom Chivers in The Daily Telegraph.[97] Dawkins has responded at length to the most common criticisms he has received in a post titled "Calm reflections after a storm in a teacup".[98]

Dawkins has criticised the term Islamophobia. In 2015, along with the National Secular Society, he expressed opposition to a proposal by then Labour Party leader Ed Miliband to make Islamophobia an "aggravated crime." Dawkins stated that the proposed law was too vague, put religion above scrutiny and questioned if it hypothetically could be used to prosecute Charlie Hebdo or if he could be jailed for quoting violent passages from Islamic scripture on Twitter.[99]

Dawkins also commented on the short film Fitna produced by Geert Wilders, a film that argues that Islam promotes violence among its followers. Fitna caused an international uproar. Dawkins wrote that while Geert has done things that "justify epithets such as 'disgusting', or 'racist,' as far as this film is concerned, I can see nothing in it to substantiate such extreme vilification...Geert Wilders, if it should turn out that you are a racist or a gratuitous stirrer and provocateur I withdraw my respect, but on the strength of Fitna alone I salute you as a man of courage, who has the balls to stand up to a monstrous enemy."[95]

Political views

War on Terror and Terrorism

Dawkins was opposed to the Iraq War. "Well what I really objected to was the lying about the motives for going into Iraq…it was an act of political opportunism."[100] However, Dawkins supported the Afghan War. "I felt that America needed to try and find those responsible [for 9/11], and it did really appear as though Al-Qaeda was being actively encouraged by the Taliban regime in Afghanistan."[100]

Dawkins blamed Islam as a whole for the Charlie Hebdo shooting. His comments resulted in criticisms from several publications, including Al Jazeera, The Guardian, and Salon, deriding him as Islamophobic.[101] Soon after the attacks, Dawkins tweeted, "No, all religions are NOT equally violent. Some have never been violent, some gave it up centuries ago. One religion conspicuously didn't," referring to Islam.[102]

Stem cell research

In the stem cell controversy, Dawkins favors stem cell research, even if it involves human embryos. "The 'embryos' used for stem cell research are no bigger than a pinhead, and completely lacking in sentience of any kind. The illogical and hypocritical inconsistency between [George W.] Bush's stance on embryonic stem cell research on the one hand, and on slaughtered and maimed Iraqis and Lebanese on the other, is the subject of this article."[103]

Government
Dawkins at the University of Texas at Austin in 2008.

UK government

Dawkins was highly critical of the UK government under former Prime Minister David Cameron. In an issue of New Statesman, Dawkins heavily criticized Cameron for what he saw as Cameron promoting religion, and specifically Christianity, in the UK and particularly denounced government-supported faith schools.

A depressingly large number of intelligent and educated people […] still vaguely presume without thinking about it that religious faith is somehow 'good' for other people, good for society, good for public order, good for instilling morals, good for the common people even if we chaps don't need it. Condescending? Patronising? Yes, but isn't that largely what lies behind successive governments' enthusiasm for faith schools?[104]

On Scottish independence, Dawkins joined more than 200 celebrities, including Helena Bonham Carter, Judi Dench, Stephen Hawking, and Andrew Lloyd Webber, in signing an open letter stating, "We want to let you know how very much we value our bonds of citizenship with you, and to express our hope that you will vote to renew them. What unites us is much greater than what divides us. Let's stay together," urging the Scottish people to vote "no" on the 2014 referendum on the issue.[105] After the Brexit referendum, he tweeted "But if I were Scottish today I'd want to leave the nasty little backwater that England is becoming".[106]

Dawkins was opposed to the UK European Union membership referendum 2016 and criticised David Cameron for calling it.[107]

United States government

Dawkins was very critical of the United States government under George W. Bush, especially his Iraq War decisions. He criticized Bush by stating that "George W. Bush says that God told him to invade Iraq (a pity God didn't vouchsafe him a revelation that there were no weapons of mass destruction)."[108] Dawkins has also said that he thinks American politicians should pay more attention to America's secular crowd. "I think that may be a lesson politicians need to learn, that they don't only need to suck up to the Catholic lobby and the Jewish lobby and Islam, that lobby. Maybe the nonbelievers lobby is a lot more powerful than they realize."[109] Also, Dawkins thinks that U.S. politicians should not invoke religion in their policies. "Politicians shouldn't be promoting religion as part of their government legislation."[109] Dawkins has also expressed his belief that Bush was not actually elected in the controversial 2000 U.S. presidential election through an editorial in The Guardian:

September 11 was your golden Pearl Harbor. This was how you'd get elected in 2004 (not re-elected, elected). You would announce a War on Terror. American troops would win. And you would be the victorious warlord, swaggering in a flight suit before a Mission Accomplished banner. It worked in Afghanistan. But then those puppeteers moved on to their long-term project: Iraq.[110]

Israeli–Palestinian conflict

Dawkins has stated that he is "on the fence" about the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, and has embraced Christopher Hitchens's statement that "It is reasonable to both deplore both the original foundation of the Jewish State of Israel & aspirations now to destroy it."[111][112] Dawkins said that "can you explain why Palestinian Arabs should be the ones to pay for Hitler's crimes? You surely aren't going to stoop to some kind of biblical justification for picking on that land rather than, say, Bavaria or Madagascar?[111] Dawkins also expressed anger over Israeli actions during the 2014 Israel–Gaza conflict. He tweeted, "[t]he extent of the destruction in Gaza is obscene. Poor people. Poor people who have lost their homes, their relatives, everything."[111]

Global warming

Dawkins accepts that global warming is a major problem facing the world currently. He supported an initiative in which 56 newspapers from 47 countries simultaneously published a joint editorial expressing their views on climate change in order to promote awareness of the problem. He wrote, "[w]hatever you think about global warming and whether humans are responsible, I think we have to salute this remarkable feat of international cooperation."[113] Dawkins has also stated that he accepts that global warming is a threat to the human species.[114] Dawkins has also commended Al Gore's documentary An Inconvenient Truth and in response to the question "Is global warming a threat to the human species?" has replied: "Yes. You could say that the human species is a threat to the human species. I recommend Al Gore's film on global warming. See it and weep. Not just for the human species. Weep for what we could have had in 2000, but for the vote-rigging in Jeb Bush's Florida."[114]

gollark: Replying to https://discord.com/channels/346530916832903169/348702212110680064/778015958677585981 VARIOUS apioforms
gollark: Are you sure they can't be done manually?
gollark: Oh, neæt.
gollark: Ideatic idea: git.osmarks.tk™.
gollark: ↓ Palaiologos in IRL real life

References
  1. John Harris (October 24, 2011). "National Conversations". The Guardian (Podcast). Retrieved January 29, 2015.
  2. Powell, Michael (September 19, 2011). "Richard Dawkins, an Original Thinker Who Bashes Orthodoxy". The New York Times. Retrieved January 29, 2015.
  3. McAnulla, Stuart (2006). British Politics: a critical introduction. Continuum International Publishing Group. pp. 118, 127, 133, 141. ISBN 0-8264-6156-5.
  4. Hay, Colin (2002). British Politics Today. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 114, 115. ISBN 0-7456-2319-0.
  5. Bakewell, Joan; Greer, Germaine; Dawkins, Richard; et al. (June 11, 2009). "20 ways to save Labour". New Statesman. Retrieved January 29, 2015.
  6. "Show your support – vote for the Liberal Democrats on May 6th. libdems.org.uk. Monday, 03 May 2010". Libdems.org.uk. Archived from the original on 19 April 2013. Retrieved 29 July 2010.
  7. Sparrow, Andrew (September 20, 2009). "Richard Dawkins Condemns British Libel Laws". The Guardian. Retrieved February 7, 2015.
  8. Dawkins, Richard (May 10, 2010). "Electoral Reform: The Liberal Democrats Must Stand Firm". The Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science. Retrieved February 7, 2015.
  9. Andrew Sparrow. "Richard Dawkins condemns British libel laws". the Guardian.
  10. Alastair Jamieson (21 September 2009). "Liberal Democrats back calls from Richard Dawkins to reform libel laws". Telegraph.co.uk.
  11. Dawkins, Richard (2008-07-07). "Venomous Snakes, Slippery Eels and Harun Yahya". Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science. Archived from the original on 2013-06-23. Retrieved 2008-10-17.
  12. "Richard Dawkins rips into Harun Yahya and Muslim creationism". Reuters.
  13. Riazat Butt. "Turkish court bans Richard Dawkins website". the Guardian.
  14. Jessica Salter (19 September 2008). "Richard Dawkins website banned in Turkey". Telegraph.co.uk.
  15. "'There are more people working on censoring the Internet than developing it' - Index on Censorship - Index on Censorship". indexoncensorship.org.
  16. "Pakistan Government Bans Online Political Forum Siasat.pk". 11 Sep 2015. Richard Dawkins’ website and the Internet Movie Database (IMDb) were blocked for brief periods in 2013.
  17. "Top Torrent Sites and Richard Dawkins Blocked in Pakistan". TorrentFreak.
  18. "Sir Salman Rushdie facing threats of Muslim reprisals over Jaipur Literature Festival appearance". Telegraph.co.uk. 10 January 2012.
  19. "Forget religion, get 21st century morals: Richard Dawkins". dna. 24 January 2012.
  20. "Look forward to the death of organized religion: Richard Dawkins". The Times of India.
  21. "Richard Dawkins: You Can't Read this Book, "Nick Cohen's brilliant broadside against 'censorship in an age of freedom'."". Nick Cohen: Writing from London.
  22. "Antievolution resolutions introduced in Oklahoma - NCSE". Archived from the original on 14 September 2015.
  23. "Oklahoma Legislator Introduces Bill to Ban Evolutionary Biologist Richard Dawkins". Reason.com.
  24. Adam Scott (7 March 2009). "Dawkins lecture draws thousands at OU". Norman Transcript.
  25. The Purpose of Purpose - Richard Dawkins. 19 June 2009 – via YouTube.
  26. "Bill Maher, Richard Dawkins Rip 'Regressive Leftists' Giving a 'Free Pass' to Islam". mediaite.com.
  27. "Richard Dawkins: College Students Are Betraying The Free Speech Movement". The Huffington Post. 3 October 2015.
  28. Simon Gilbert (27 September 2015). "Anger as speaker at Warwick University banned over Islam offence fears". Coventry Telegraph.
  29. "Maryam Namazie: Warwick University student union ban on ex-Muslim campaigner overturned after outcry". Yahoo News UK. 28 September 2015.
  30. "Academic Richard Dawkins defends Germiane Greer - Gay News Network". Gay News Network. Archived from the original on 28 October 2015.
  31. "Richard Dawkins tells students upset by Germaine Greer to 'go home and hug a teddy'". PinkNews. Archived from the original on 27 October 2015.
  33. Kutner, Jenny (December 8, 2014). "Richard Dawkins: "Is There a Men's Rights Movement?"". Salon. Retrieved February 1, 2015.
  34. Dawkins, Richard; Benson, Ophelia (July 26, 2014). "Joint statement by Ophelia Benson and Richard Dawkins". Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science. Retrieved February 1, 2015.
  35. Marcotte, Amanda (October 3, 2014). "Atheism's Shocking Woman Problem: What's Behind the Misogyny of Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris?". Salon. Retrieved February 1, 2015.
  36. Winston, Kimberly (August 7, 2014). "Richard Dawkins: Atheism's Asset or Liability?". Religion News Service. Retrieved February 4, 2015.
  37. Marcotte, Amanda (July 29, 2014). "Richard Dawkins Explains a Principle He Himself Refuses to Adhere To". The Raw Story. Retrieved February 4, 2015.
  38. "Why Richard Dawkins Was Booted from the NECSS Conference". Friendly Atheist.
  39. "Concerning Richard Dawkins". Archived from the original on 15 February 2016. Retrieved 30 January 2016.
  40. "Statement from the Executive Committee". Archived from the original on 15 February 2016.
  41. Winston, Kimberly (September 15, 2011). "Atheists Address Sexism Issues". USA Today. Retrieved February 2, 2015.
  42. Watson, Rebecca (June 20, 2011). "About Mythbusters, Robot Eyes, Feminism, and Jokes". Skepchick. Retrieved February 2, 2015.
  43. Myers, PZ (July 2, 2011). "Always Name Names!". Pharyngula. Retrieved February 2, 2015.
  44. Green, David Allen (July 6, 2011). "Sharing a Lift With Richard Dawkins". New Statesman. Retrieved February 2, 2011.
  45. Stern, Remy. "Richard Dawkins Torn Limb From Limb—By Atheists". Gawker. Retrieved February 2, 2015.
  46. Myers, PZ (July 3, 2011). "Oh, No, Not Again…Once More Unto the Breach". Pharyngula. Retrieved February 2, 2015.
  47. Dickson, Caitlin (July 6, 2011). "Richard Dawkins Gets into a Comments War with Feminists". The Wire. Retrieved February 2, 2015.
  48. Watson, Rebecca (July 5, 2011). "The Privilege Delusion". Skepchick. Retrieved February 2, 2015.
  49. "Dear Richard Dawkins". Skepchick. July 6, 2011. Retrieved February 2, 2015.
  50. Maria, Cara Santa (November 6, 2011). "Richard Dawkins and the Evolution of Homosexuality". The Huffington Post. Retrieved February 3, 2015.
  51. Mehta, Hemant (December 9, 2014). "Richard Dawkins' Conversation at Kennesaw State University". Friendly Atheist. Retrieved February 3, 2015.
  52. Hallowell, Billy (March 15, 2013). "Atheist Richard Dawkins Ignites Firestorm with 'Pro-Abortion' Tweets". TheBlaze. Retrieved February 3, 2015.
  53. "Richard Dawkins: 'Immoral' Not to Abort if Foetus has Down's Syndrome". The Guardian. August 21, 2014. Retrieved February 3, 2015.
  54. Bingham, John (August 21, 2014). "Richard Dawkins: It's Immoral To Allow Down's Syndrome Babies to Be Born". The New Zealand Herald. Retrieved February 3, 2015.
  55. "Richard Dawkins Apologizes for Causing Storm with Down's Syndrome Tweet". The Guardian. August 21, 2014. Retrieved February 3, 2015.
  56. "Mission and Vision". The Great Ape Project. Retrieved February 6, 2015.
  57. "Meeting Peter Singer". The Great Ape Project. Retrieved February 6, 2015.
  58. Dawkins, Richard (1993). Cavalieri, Paola; Singer, Peter (eds.). Gaps In the Mind (from The Great Ape Project). New York: St. Martin's Griffin. pp. 81–87. ISBN 978-0312118181. Retrieved February 6, 2015.
  59. The Daily Dish. "The Third Strike". The Atlantic.
  60. Helen Pidd. "Richard Dawkins calls for Pope to be put on trial". the Guardian.
  61. Richard Dawkins. "The pope should stand trial". the Guardian.
  62. Thom Dyke, "The Case of the Pope: Vatican Accountability for Human Rights Abuse". Solicitors Journal. 20 September 2010. Archived from the original on 29 September 2011. Retrieved 25 June 2011.
  63. Robertson, Geoffrey (2 April 2010). "Put the pope in the dock". The Guardian. Retrieved 1 June 2010.
  64. "Physical versus mental child abuse". richarddawkins.net. 1 Jan 2013. I was myself sexually abused by a teacher when I was about nine or ten years old. It was a very unpleasant and embarrassing experience, but the mental trauma was soon exorcised by comparing notes with my contemporaries who had suffered it previously at the hands of the same master. Missing or empty |url= (help)
  65. Stoyan Zaimov. "Dawkins refers to own experience of sexual abuse by priest, still insists teaching hell to children is worse". Christian Today.
  66. "Child Abuse: a misunderstanding. w/ Polish translation". richarddawkins.net. I would watch games of squash from the gallery, waiting for the game to end so I could slip down and practise by myself. One day – I must have been about eleven – there was a master in the gallery with me. He pulled me onto his knee and put his hand inside my shorts. He did no more than have a little feel, but it was extremely disagreeable (the cremasteric reflex is not painful, but in a skin-crawling, creepy way it is almost worse than painful) as well as embarrassing. As soon as I could wriggle off his lap, I ran to tell my friends, many of whom had had the same experience with him. I don’t think he did any of us any lasting damage, but some years later he killed himself.
  67. Baker, Katie J.M. (September 11, 2013). "Richard Dawkins Thinks "Mild Pedophilia" is No Big Deal". Jezebel. Retrieved February 7, 2015.
  68. Grundy, Trevor (September 9, 2013). "Richard Dawkins Pedophilia Remarks Provoke Outrage". The Huffington Post. Retrieved February 7, 2015.
  69. "Atheism: Richard Dawkins". BBC. October 22, 2009. Retrieved February 10, 2015.
  70. Gray, John (October 4, 2014). "The Closed Mind of Richard Dawkins". New Statesman. Retrieved February 10, 2015.
  71. Hooper, Rowan (December 28, 2013). "Richard Dawkins' Hate Mail". Slate. Retrieved February 10, 2015.
  72. Kay, Joe (March 15, 2007). "Science, Religion, and Society: Richard Dawkins's The God Delusion". World Socialist Web Site. Retrieved February 10, 2015.
  73. Dawkins, Richard (May 14, 2006). "Religion's Real Child Abuse". The Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science. Retrieved February 10, 2015.
  74. "Richard Dawkins: Militant Atheism". TED. February 2002. Retrieved February 10, 2015.
  75. Dawkins (2006), p. 406
  76. Dawkins, Richard (April 10, 2006). "Atheists for Jesus". The Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science. Retrieved February 11, 2015.
  77. Knapton, Sarah (May 24, 2014). "Richard Dawkins: 'I Am a Secular Christian'". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved February 11, 2015.
  78. Furness, Hannah (August 13, 2014). "Richard Dawkins: Churchgoers Enable Fundamentalists by Being 'Nice'". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved February 11, 2015.
  79. Richard Dawkins' Berkeley event cancelled for 'Islamophobia', BBC, 2017
  80. Radio station cancels Richard Dawkins appearance over Islam tweets, The Independent, 2017
  81. Taylor, Jerome (April 12, 2013). "Atheists Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens and Sam Harris Face Islamophobia Backlash". The Independent. Retrieved February 12, 2015.
  82. Emilsen, William W. (August 2012). "The New Atheism and Islam". The Expository Times. Retrieved February 12, 2015.
  83. "Richard Dawkins hits back at allegations he is Islamophobic after Berkeley event is cancelled".
  84. "Dawkins Twitter This is almost as impressive as the prescient knowledge that embryo starts as a blob, semen comes from the spine & the sun sets in a marsh".
  85. Hallowell, Billy (August 15, 2014). "Atheist Richard Dawkins' Controversial Claim About How 'Moderate Religious People' Might Be Empowering Religious Extremists". TheBlaze. Retrieved February 12, 2015.
  86. Richard Dawkins: religious education is crucial for British schoolchildren; The Telegraph; June 11, 2017
  87. "Richard Dawkins' Berkeley event cancelled for 'Islamophobia'". BBC. July 24, 2017. Retrieved July 24, 2017.
  88. Wilford, Greg (July 22, 2017). "Radio station cancels Richard Dawkins appearance over Islam tweets". The Independent. Retrieved July 24, 2017.
  89. Fortrin, Jacey (July 24, 2017). "Richard Dawkins Event Canceled Over Past Comments About Islam". The New York Times. Retrieved July 24, 2017.
  90. Flood, Alison (July 24, 2017). "Richard Dawkins event cancelled over his 'abusive speech against Islam'". The Guardian. Retrieved July 24, 2017.
  91. Statement on Cancellation of Richard Dawkins Event; KPFA; July 24, 2017
  92. Arel, Dan (October 14, 2014). "Richard Dawkins: Religion Isn't the Problem in the Middle East". Salon. Retrieved February 12, 2015.
  93. "Dawkins: Islam Is 'One of the Great Evils In the World". Freethought Nation. February 9, 2011. Retrieved February 12, 2015.
  94. Hafiz, Yasmine (August 9, 2013). "Richard Dawkins' Anti-Muslim Tweets Spark Furor, Even Among Atheist Supporters". The Huffington Post. Retrieved February 13, 2015.
  95. Ohlheiser (August 8, 2013). "A Short History of Richard Dawkins vs. The Internet". The Atlantic Wire. Retrieved February 13, 2015.
  96. Meikle, James (August 8, 2013). "Richard Dawkins Criticised for Twitter Comment about Muslims". The Guardian. Retrieved February 13, 2015.
  97. Chivers, Tom (August 8, 2013). "Please Be Quiet, Richard Dawkins, I'm Begging, as a Fan". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on August 10, 2013. Retrieved February 13, 2015.CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown (link)
  98. Dawkins, Richard (August 26, 2013). "Calm Reflections After a Storm in a Teacup". The Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science. Retrieved February 13, 2015.
  99. "Free speech campaigners concerned by Ed Miliband's vow to ban 'Islamophobia'- without defining what it means". National Secular Society. 29 April 2015. Retrieved 5 September 2019.
  100. Kennard, Matt (March 21, 2010). "Richard Dawkins Interview on Religion, Evolution, and Iraq". The Comment Factory. Retrieved February 3, 2015.
  101. Sieczkowski, Cavan (January 7, 2015). "Richard Dawkins Says 'Religions Are NOT Equally Violent' After Charlie Hebdo Attack". The Huffington Post. Retrieved February 3, 2015.
  102. Hallowell, Billy (January 7, 2015). "Atheist Richard Dawkins Has a Message About Islam in the Wake of France's Deadly Terror Attack". TheBlaze. Retrieved February 10, 2015.
  103. Dawkins, Richard (July 31, 2006). "Collateral Damage 1: Embryos and Stem Cell Research". The Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science. Retrieved February 3, 2015.
  104. "Richard Dawkins Attacks David Cameron Over Faith Schools". New Statesman. December 12, 2011. Retrieved February 4, 2015.
  105. "Celebrities' Open Letter to Scotland: Full Text". The Guardian. August 7, 2014. Retrieved February 4, 2015.
  106. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/richard-dawkings-england-nasty-little-backwater-brexit-uk-britain-scientists-racism-a7655136.html
  107. Temperton, James (June 30, 2016). "Richard Dawkins: David Cameron should be 'ever-damned' for calling the EU Referendum". Wired UK. Retrieved July 2, 2016.
  108. Dawkins, Richard (October 26, 2006). "Why There Is No God". The Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science. Retrieved February 6, 2015.
  109. "Richard Dawkins To U.S. Politicians: Embrace Atheist Lobby". Inquisitr. October 21, 2013. Retrieved February 6, 2015.
  110. Jack, Ian; Freedland, Jonathan; Dawkins, Richard; et al. (November 18, 2003). "While We Have Your Attention, Mr. President… (Part Three)". The Guardian. Retrieved February 6, 2015.
  111. Dawkins, Richard (July 30, 2014). "Are There Emotional No-Go Areas Where Logic Dare Not Show Its Face?". The Huffington Post. Retrieved February 7, 2015.
  112. "In Defense of Richard Dawkins?". Jezebel. July 30, 2014. Retrieved February 7, 2015.
  113. Dawkins, Richard (December 6, 2009). "Climate Change Editorial". Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science. Retrieved February 6, 2015.
  114. "Richard Dawkins: You Ask the Questions Special". The Independent. December 4, 2006. Retrieved February 6, 2015.
Works cited
  • Richard Dawkins (2006). The God Delusion. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. ISBN 0-618-68000-4.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.