Nucleon

In chemistry and physics, a nucleon is either a proton or a neutron, considered in its role as a component of an atomic nucleus. The number of nucleons in a nucleus defines an isotope's mass number (nucleon number).

An atomic nucleus is shown here as a compact bundle of the two types of nucleons, protons (red) and neutrons (blue). In this picture, the protons and neutrons are shown as distinct, which is the conventional view in chemistry, for example. But in an actual nucleus, as understood by modern nuclear physics, the nucleons are partially delocalized and organize themselves according to the laws of quantum chromodynamics.

Until the 1960s, nucleons were thought to be elementary particles, not made up of smaller parts. Now they are known to be composite particles, made of three quarks bound together by the so-called strong interaction. The interaction between two or more nucleons is called internucleon interaction or nuclear force, which is also ultimately caused by the strong interaction. (Before the discovery of quarks, the term "strong interaction" referred to just internucleon interactions.)

Nucleons sit at the boundary where particle physics and nuclear physics overlap. Particle physics, particularly quantum chromodynamics, provides the fundamental equations that explain the properties of quarks and of the strong interaction. These equations explain quantitatively how quarks can bind together into protons and neutrons (and all the other hadrons). However, when multiple nucleons are assembled into an atomic nucleus (nuclide), these fundamental equations become too difficult to solve directly (see lattice QCD). Instead, nuclides are studied within nuclear physics, which studies nucleons and their interactions by approximations and models, such as the nuclear shell model. These models can successfully explain nuclide properties, as for example, whether or not a particular nuclide undergoes radioactive decay.

The proton and neutron are in a scheme of categories being at once fermions, hadrons and baryons. The proton carries a positive net charge and the neutron carries a zero net charge; the proton's mass is only about 0.13% less than the neutron's. Thus, they can be viewed as two states of the same nucleon, and together form an isospin doublet (I = ¹⁄₂). In isospin space, neutrons can be transformed into protons via SU(2) symmetries, and vice versa. These nucleons are acted upon equally by the strong interaction, which is invariant under rotation in isospin space. According to the Noether theorem, isospin is conserved with respect to the strong interaction.[1]^:129–130

Overview

Properties

Quark composition of a nucleon

Proton (
p
):
u

u

d

Neutron (
n
):
u

d

d

Antiproton (
p
):
u

u

d

Antineutron (
n
):
u

d

d

A proton (p) is composed of two up quarks (u) and one down quark (d): uud. A neutron (n) has one up quark (u) and two down quarks (d): udd. An antiproton (
p
) has two up antiquarks (
u
) and one down antiquark (
d
):
u

u

d
. An antineutron (
n
) has one up antiquark (
u
) and two down antiquarks (
d
):
u

d

d
. The color charge (color assignment) of individual quarks is arbitrary, but all three colors (red, green, blue) must be present.

Protons and neutrons are best known in their role as nucleons, i.e., as the components of atomic nuclei, but they also exist as free particles. Free neutrons are unstable, with a half-life of around 13 minutes, but they have important applications (see neutron radiation and neutron scattering). Protons not bound to other nucleons are the nuclei of hydrogen atoms when bound with an electron or — if not bound to anything — are ions or cosmic rays.

Both the proton and the neutron are composite particles, meaning each is composed of smaller parts, namely three quarks each; although once thought to be so, neither is an elementary particle. A proton is composed of two up quarks and one down quark, while the neutron has one up quark and two down quarks. Quarks are held together by the strong force, or equivalently, by gluons, which mediate the strong force at the quark level.

An up quark has electric charge + ²⁄₃ e, and a down quark has charge − ¹⁄₃ e, so the summed electric charges of proton and neutron are +e and 0, respectively.[lower-alpha 1] Thus, the neutron has a charge of 0 (zero), and therefore is electrically neutral; indeed, the term "neutron" comes from the fact that a neutron is electrically neutral.

The masses of the proton and neutron are quite similar: The proton is 1.6726×10⁻²⁷ kg or 938.27 MeV/c², while the neutron is 1.6749×10⁻²⁷ kg or 939.57 MeV/c². The neutron is roughly 0.13% heavier. The similarity in mass can be explained roughly by the slight difference in masses of up quarks and down quarks composing the nucleons. However, a detailed explanation remains an unsolved problem in particle physics.[1]^:135–136

The spin of the nucleon is ¹⁄₂, which means they are fermions and, like electrons, are subject to the Pauli exclusion principle: No more than one nucleon, e.g. in an atomic nucleus, may occupy the same quantum state.

The isospin and spin quantum numbers of the nucleon have two states each, resulting in four combinations in total. An alpha particle is composed of four nucleons occupying all four combinations, namely it has two protons (having opposite spin) and two neutrons (also having opposite spin) and its net nuclear spin is zero. In larger nuclei constituent nucleons, to avoid Pauli exclusion, are compelled to have relative motion which may also contribute to nuclear spin via the orbital quantum number. They spread out into nuclear shells analogous to electron shells known from chemistry.

The magnetic moment of a proton, denoted $μ$ _p, is 2.79 μ_N (where μ_N represents the atomic-scale unit of measure called the nuclear magneton). The magnetic moment of a neutron is $μ$ _n = −1.91 μ_N. These parameters are also important in NMR / MRI scanning.

Stability

A neutron in free state is an unstable particle, with a half-life around ten minutes. It undergoes
β⁻
decay (a type of radioactive decay) by turning into a proton while emitting an electron and an electron antineutrino. (See the Neutron article for more discussion of neutron decay.) A proton by itself is thought to be stable, or at least its lifetime is too long to measure. This is an important discussion in particle physics, (see Proton decay).

Inside a nucleus, on the other hand, combined protons and neutrons (nucleons) can be stable or unstable depending on the nuclide, or nuclear species. Inside some nuclides, a neutron can turn into a proton (producing other particles) as described above; the reverse can happen inside other nuclides, where a proton turns into a neutron (producing other particles) through
β⁺
decay, or electron capture. And inside still other nuclides, both protons and neutrons are stable and do not change form.

Antinucleons

Both nucleons have corresponding antiparticles: the antiproton and the antineutron, which have the same mass and opposite charge as the proton and neutron respectively, and they interact in the same way. (This is generally believed to be exactly true, due to CPT symmetry. If there is a difference, it is too small to measure in all experiments to date.) In particular, antinucleons can bind into an "antinucleus". So far, scientists have created antideuterium[2][3] and antihelium-3[4] nuclei.

Tables of detailed properties

Nucleons

Nucleons (*I = ¹⁄₂; S = C = B = 0*)
Particle name	Symbol	Quark content	Mass (MeV/c²)	Mass (u)^{^[a]}	I₃	J^P	Q (e)	Magnetic moment	Mean lifetime (s)	Commonly decays to
proton[PDG 1]	p / p⁺ / N⁺	u u d	938.272013±0.000023	1.00727646677±0.00000000010	+¹⁄₂	¹⁄₂⁺	+1	2.792847356±0.000000023	Stable^{^[b]}	Unobserved
neutron[PDG 2]	n / n⁰ / N⁰	u d d	939.565346±0.000023	1.00866491597±0.00000000043	− ¹⁄₂	¹⁄₂⁺	0	−1.91304273±0.00000045	(8.857±0.008)×10⁺²^{^[c]}	p + e⁻ + ν _e
antiproton	p / p⁻ / N⁻	u u d	938.272013±0.000023	1.00727646677±0.00000000010	− ¹⁄₂	¹⁄₂⁺	−1	−2.793±0.006	Stable^{^[b]}	Unobserved
antineutron	n / n⁰ / N⁰	u d d	939.485±0.051	1.00866491597±0.00000000043	+ ¹⁄₂	¹⁄₂⁺	0	?	(8.857±0.008)×10⁺²^{^[c]}	p + e⁺ + ν _e

^a The masses of the proton and neutron are known with far greater precision in atomic mass units (u) than in MeV/c², due to the relatively poorly known value of the elementary charge. The conversion factor used is 1 u = 931.494028±0.000023 MeV/c². The masses of their antiparticles are assumed to be identical, and no experiments have refuted this to date. Current experiments show any percent difference between the masses of the proton and antiproton must be less than 2×10⁻⁹[PDG 1] and the difference between the neutron and antineutron masses is on the order of (9±6)×10⁻⁵ MeV/c².[PDG 2]

Proton-antiproton CPT invariance tests
Test	Formula	PDG Result[PDG 1]
Mass	${\frac {\|m_{p}-m_{\bar {p}}\|}{m_{p}}}$	< 2×10⁻⁹
Charge-to-mass ratio	${\frac {\|{\frac {q_{\bar {p}}}{m_{\bar {p}}}}\|}{({\frac {q_{p}}{m_{p}}})}}$	0.99999999991±0.00000000009
Charge-to-mass-to-mass ratio	${\frac {\|{\frac {q_{\bar {p}}}{m_{\bar {p}}}}\|-{\frac {q_{p}}{m_{p}}}}{\frac {q_{p}}{m_{p}}}}$	(−9±9)×10⁻¹¹
Charge	${\frac {\|q_{p}+q_{\bar {p}}\|}{e}}$	< 2×10⁻⁹
Electron charge	${\frac {\|q_{p}+q_{e}\|}{e}}$	<1×10⁻²¹
Magnetic moment	${\frac {\|\mu _{p}+\mu _{\bar {p}}\|}{\mu _{p}}}$	(−0.1±2.1)×10⁻³

^b At least 10³⁵ years. See proton decay.

^c For free neutrons; in most common nuclei, neutrons are stable.

Nucleon resonances

Nucleon resonances are excited states of nucleon particles, often corresponding to one of the quarks having a flipped spin state, or with different orbital angular momentum when the particle decays. Only resonances with a 3 or 4 star rating at the Particle Data Group (PDG) are included in this table. Due to their extraordinarily short lifetimes, many properties of these particles are still under investigation.

The symbol format is given as N( $m$ ) L_IJ, where $m$ is the particle's approximate mass, L is the orbital angular momentum of the Nucleon-meson pair, produced when it decays, and I and J are the particle's isospin and total angular momentum respectively. Since nucleons are defined as having ¹⁄₂ isospin, the first number will always be 1, and the second number will always be odd. When discussing nucleon resonances, sometimes the N is omitted and the order is reversed, in the form L_IJ ( $m$ ); for example, a proton can be denoted as "N(939) S₁₁" or "S₁₁ (939)".

The table below lists only the base resonance; each individual entry represents 4 baryons: 2 nucleon resonances particles, as well as their 2 antiparticles. Each resonance exists in a form with a positive electric charge (Q), with a quark composition of
u

u

d
like the proton, and a neutral form, with a quark composition of
u

d

d
like the neutron, as well as the corresponding antiparticles with antiquark compositions of
u

u

d
and
u

d

d
respectively. Since they contain no strange, charm, bottom, or top quarks, these particles do not possess strangeness, etc.

The table only lists the resonances with an isospin = ¹⁄₂. For resonances with isospin = ³⁄₂, see the article on Delta baryons.

Nucleon resonances with I = ¹⁄₂
Symbol	J^P	PDG mass average (MeV/c²)	Full Width (MeV/c²)	Pole Position (Real Part)	Pole Position (−2 × Imaginary Part)	Common decays (Γ_i /Γ > 50%)
N(939) P₁₁ [PDG 3]†	¹⁄₂⁺	939	†	†	†	†
N(1440) P₁₁ [PDG 4] aka the Roper resonance	¹⁄₂⁺	1440 (1420–1470)	300 (200–450)	1365 (1350–1380)	190 (160–220)	N + π
N(1520) D₁₃ [PDG 5]	³⁄₂⁻	1520 (1515–1525)	115 (100–125)	1510 (1505–1515)	110 (105–120)	N + π
N(1535) S₁₁ [PDG 6]	¹⁄₂⁻	1535 (1525–1545)	150 (125–175)	1510 1490 — 1530)	170 (90–250)	N + π or N + η
N(1650) S₁₁ [PDG 7]	¹⁄₂⁻	1650 (1645–1670)	165 (145–185)	1665 (1640–1670)	165 (150–180)	N + π
N(1675) D₁₅ [PDG 8]	⁵⁄₂⁻	1675 (1670–1680)	150 (135–165)	1660 (1655–1665)	135 (125–150)	N + π + π or Δ + π
N(1680) F₁₅ [PDG 9]	⁵⁄₂⁺	1685 (1680–1690)	130 (120–140)	1675 (1665–1680)	120 (110–135)	N + π
N(1700) D₁₃ [PDG 10]	³⁄₂⁻	1700 (1650–1750)	100 (50–150)	1680 (1630–1730)	100 (50–150)	N + π + π
N(1710) P₁₁ [PDG 11]	¹⁄₂⁺	1710 (1680–1740)	100 (50–250)	1720 (1670–1770)	230 (80–380)	N + π + π
N(1720) P₁₃ [PDG 12]	³⁄₂⁺	1720 (1700–1750)	200 (150–300)	1675 (1660–1690)	115–275	N + π + π or N + ρ
N(2190) G₁₇ [PDG 13]	⁷⁄₂⁻	2190 (2100–2200)	500 (300–700)	2075 (2050–2100)	450 (400–520)	N + π (10—20%)
N(2220) H₁₉ [PDG 14]	⁹⁄₂⁺	2250 (2200–2300)	400 (350–500)	2170 (2130–2200)	480 (400–560)	N + π (10—20%)
N(2250) G₁₉ [PDG 15]	⁹⁄₂⁻	2250 (2200–2350)	500 (230–800)	2200 (2150–2250)	450 (350–550)	N + π (5—15%)

† The P₁₁(939) nucleon represents the excited state of a normal proton or neutron, for example, within the nucleus of an atom. Such particles are usually stable within the nucleus, i.e. Lithium-6.

Quark model classification

In the quark model with SU(2) flavour, the two nucleons are part of the ground state doublet. The proton has quark content of uud, and the neutron, udd. In SU(3) flavour, they are part of the ground state octet (8) of spin ¹⁄₂ baryons, known as the Eightfold way. The other members of this octet are the hyperons strange isotriplet
Σ⁺
,
Σ⁰
,
Σ⁻
, the
Λ
and the strange isodoublet
Ξ⁰
,
Ξ⁻
. One can extend this multiplet in SU(4) flavour (with the inclusion of the charm quark) to the ground state 20-plet, or to SU(6) flavour (with the inclusion of the top and bottom quarks) to the ground state 56-plet.

The article on isospin provides an explicit expression for the nucleon wave functions in terms of the quark flavour eigenstates.

Models

Although it is known that the nucleon is made from three quarks, as of 2006, it is not known how to solve the equations of motion for quantum chromodynamics. Thus, the study of the low-energy properties of the nucleon are performed by means of models. The only first-principles approach available is to attempt to solve the equations of QCD numerically, using lattice QCD. This requires complicated algorithms and very powerful supercomputers. However, several analytic models also exist:

Skyrmion models

The Skyrmion models the nucleon as a topological soliton in a non-linear SU(2) pion field. The topological stability of the Skyrmion is interpreted as the conservation of baryon number, that is, the non-decay of the nucleon. The local topological winding number density is identified with the local baryon number density of the nucleon. With the pion isospin vector field oriented in the shape of a hedgehog space, the model is readily solvable, and is thus sometimes called the hedgehog model. The hedgehog model is able to predict low-energy parameters, such as the nucleon mass, radius and axial coupling constant, to approximately 30% of experimental values.

MIT bag model

The MIT bag model [5][6][7] confines three non-interacting quarks to a spherical cavity, with the boundary condition that the quark vector current vanish on the boundary. The non-interacting treatment of the quarks is justified by appealing to the idea of asymptotic freedom, whereas the hard boundary condition is justified by quark confinement.

Mathematically, the model vaguely resembles that of a radar cavity, with solutions to the Dirac equation standing in for solutions to the Maxwell equations and the vanishing vector current boundary condition standing for the conducting metal walls of the radar cavity. If the radius of the bag is set to the radius of the nucleon, the bag model predicts a nucleon mass that is within 30% of the actual mass.

Although the basic bag model does not provide a pion-mediated interaction, it describes excellently the nucleon-nucleon forces through the 6 quark bag s-channel mechanism using the P matrix.[8] [9]

Chiral bag model

The chiral bag model[10][11] merges the MIT bag model and the Skyrmion model. In this model, a hole is punched out of the middle of the Skyrmion, and replaced with a bag model. The boundary condition is provided by the requirement of continuity of the axial vector current across the bag boundary.

Very curiously, the missing part of the topological winding number (the baryon number) of the hole punched into the Skyrmion is exactly made up by the non-zero vacuum expectation value (or spectral asymmetry) of the quark fields inside the bag. As of 2017, this remarkable trade-off between topology and the spectrum of an operator does not have any grounding or explanation in the mathematical theory of Hilbert spaces and their relationship to geometry.

Several other properties of the chiral bag are notable: It provides a better fit to the low energy nucleon properties, to within 5–10%, and these are almost completely independent of the chiral bag radius (as long as the radius is less than the nucleon radius). This independence of radius is referred to as the Cheshire Cat principle,[12] after the fading of Lewis Carroll's Cheshire Cat to just its smile. It is expected that a first-principles solution of the equations of QCD will demonstrate a similar duality of quark-pion descriptions.

gollark: I didn't actually say that. I'm not sure what you're agreeing with.

gollark: No, I mean you said you would ignore metadiscussion outside it.

gollark: You could express opinions and discuss things *anyway*, see.

gollark: It's a slightly different discussion channel with more constraints. It isn't particularly amazing as an innovation, and it enforces a style of communication you prefer and some don't on pain of being ignored (more).

gollark: You are assuming that people actually all thought of it as a good thing in the same way.

Footnotes

The resultant coefficients are obtained by summation of the component charges:
$\sum Q$ $=$ ²⁄₃ + ²⁄₃ + (− ¹⁄₃) $=$ ³⁄₃ $=$ +1,
and
$\sum Q$ $=$ ²⁄₃ + (− ¹⁄₃) + (− ¹⁄₃) $=$ ⁰⁄₃ $=$ 0.

References

Griffiths, David J. (2008). Introduction to Elementary Particles (2nd revised ed.). WILEY-VCH. ISBN 978-3-527-40601-2.
Massam, T; Muller, Th.; Righini, B.; Schneegans, M.; Zichichi, A. (1965). "Experimental observation of antideuteron production". Il Nuovo Cimento. 39 (1): 10–14. Bibcode:1965NCimS..39...10M. doi:10.1007/BF02814251.
Dorfan, D. E; Eades, J.; Lederman, L. M.; Lee, W.; Ting, C. C. (June 1965). "Observation of Antideuterons". Phys. Rev. Lett. 14 (24): 1003–1006. Bibcode:1965PhRvL..14.1003D. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.14.1003.
R. Arsenescu; et al. (2003). "Antihelium-3 production in lead-lead collisions at 158 A GeV/c". New Journal of Physics. 5 (1): 1. Bibcode:2003NJPh....5....1A. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/5/1/301.
Chodos et al. "New extended model of hadrons", Phys. Rev. D 9 3471 (1974) | https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.9.3471
Chodos et al. "Baryon structure in the bag theory", Phys. Rev. D 10 2599 (1974) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.10.2599
DeGrand et al. "Masses and other parameters of the light hadrons", Phys. Rev. D 12 2060 (1975) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.12.2060
Jaffe, R.L.; Low, F.E. (1979). "Connection between quark-model eigenstates and low-energy scattering". Phys. Rev. D. 19 (7): 2105. Bibcode:1979PhRvD..19.2105J. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.19.2105.
Yu; Simonov, A. (1981). "The quark compound bag model and the Jaffe-Low P matrix". Physics Letters B. 107 (1–2): 1. Bibcode:1981PhLB..107....1S. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(81)91133-3.
Brown, Gerald E.; Rho, Mannque (March 1979). "The little bag". Physics Letters B. 82 (2): 177–180. Bibcode:1979PhLB...82..177B. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(79)90729-9.
Vepstas, L.; Jackson, A.D.; Goldhaber, A.S. (1984). "Two-phase models of baryons and the chiral Casimir effect". Physics Letters B. 140 (5–6): 280–284. Bibcode:1984PhLB..140..280V. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(84)90753-6.
Vepstas, L.; Jackson, A.D. (1990). "Justifying the chiral bag". Physics Reports. 187 (3): 109–143. Bibcode:1990PhR...187..109V. doi:10.1016/0370-1573(90)90056-8.