Counterfeit consumer goods

Counterfeit consumer goods are goods, often of inferior quality, made or sold under another's brand name without the brand owner's authorization. Sellers of such goods may infringe on either the trademark, patent or copyright of the brand owner by passing off its goods as made by the brand owner.[2]:3 Counterfeit products made up 5 to 7% of world trade in 2013,[3][4] and in 2014 cost an estimated 2.5 million jobs worldwide,[5] with up to 750,000 jobs lost in the U.S.[6][7] About 5% of goods imported into the European Union in 2013 were fakes, according to the OECD.[8][9][10]

"Knock Off" redirects here. For the 1998 film, see Knock Off (film). For the crime, see ripoff. For creative work derivatives, see Spin-off (media).

Hardest hit countries in 2013 -
The % value of their total seizures
excludes online sales[1]

  United States (20%)
  Italy (15%)
  France (12%)
  Switzerland (12%)
  Japan (8%)
  Germany (8%)
  All others (6%)
  United Kingdom (4%)
  Luxembourg (3%)
  Finland (2%)
  Other (10%)

Sources of counterfeits in 2013[1]

  China (63.2%)
  Hong Kong (21.3%)
  Turkey (3.3%)
  Singapore (1.9%)
  Thailand (1.6%)
  India (1.2%)
  Morocco (.6%)
  UAE (.5%)
  Pakistan (.4%)
  Egypt (.4%)
  Other (5.6%)

The colloquial term knockoff is often used interchangeably with counterfeit, although their legal meanings are not identical. Knockoff products are those that copy or imitate the physical appearance of other products but which do not copy the brand name or logo of a trademark. They may still be illegal under trademark laws if they confuse consumers.[11] Counterfeiters can include producers, distributors or retail sellers.[11] Pirated goods are reproductions of copyrighted products used without permission, such as music, movies or software.[12]:96 Exact definitions depend on the laws of various countries.

Growing over 10,000% in the last two decades, counterfeit products exist in virtually every industry sector, including food, beverages, apparel, accessories, footwear, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, electronics, auto parts, toys, and currency. The spread of counterfeit goods is worldwide, with the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) in 2008 having estimated the global value of all counterfeit goods at $650 billion annually, increasing to $1.77 trillion by 2015.[13] Countries including the U.S., Italy and France are among the hardest hit, as their economies thrive on producing high-value products, protected by intellectual property rights and trademarks.[14] By 2017, the U.S. alone was estimated to be losing up to $600 billion each year to counterfeit goods, software piracy and the theft of copyrights and trade secrets.[15]

General description

According to Forbes, in 2018 counterfeiting was the largest criminal enterprise in the world.[16] Sales of counterfeit and pirated goods totals $1.7 trillion per year, which is more than drugs and human trafficking. It is expected to grow to $2.8 trillion and cost 5.4 million jobs by 2022.[16] According to The Counterfeit Report, "China produces 80% of the world's counterfeits and we're supporting China. Whether or not it's their intention to completely undermine and destroy the U.S. economy, we [in the United States] buy about 60% to 80% of the products."[16] It states:

Companies spend millions or billions of dollars building brands, and building reputations and they're being completely destroyed by Chinese counterfeits. And when you take that across a universe of goods, Americans' confidence in their own products is nonexistent. Retailers, the malls, the retail stores are closing up, and we're becoming a duopoly of Walmart and Amazon.[16]

Growth in seizures of counterfeit goods by the U.S.

The OECD states that counterfeit products encompass all products made to closely imitate the appearance of the product of another as to mislead consumers. Those can include the unauthorized production and distribution of products that are protected by intellectual property rights, such as copyright, trademarks, and trade names. Counterfeiters illegally copy trademarks, which manufacturers have built up based on marketing investments and the recognized quality of their products, in order to fool consumers.[17] Any product that is protected by intellectual property rights is a target for counterfeiters.[18] Piotr Stryszowski, a senior economist at OECD, notes that it is not only the scale of counterfeiting that is alarming, but its rapidly growing scope, which means that now any product with a logo can become a target.[19]

In many cases, different types of infringements overlap: unauthorized music copying mostly infringes copyright as well as trademarks; fake toys infringe design protection. Counterfeiting therefore involves the related issues of copying packaging, labeling, or any other significant features of the goods.[18]

Among the leading industries that have been seriously affected by counterfeiting are software, music recordings, motion pictures, luxury goods and fashion clothes, sportswear, perfumes, toys, aircraft components, spare parts and car accessories, and pharmaceuticals.[18] Counterfeit pharmaceuticals are the most profitable sector of illegally copied goods, with lost revenues up to $217 billion per year. Fraudulent drugs are known to harm or kill millions around the world, thereby damaging the brand names and sales of major pharmaceutical manufacturers.[20]

Since counterfeits are produced illegally, they are not manufactured to comply with relevant safety standards. They will often use cheap, hazardous and unapproved materials or cut costs in some other manner. These unapproved materials can be hazardous to consumers, or the environment.[21]

Growing problem

It was estimated by the OECD that in 2013 counterfeit goods accounted for about $461 billion, or about 2.5% of total world trade. That estimate did not include either domestically produced and consumed products or digital products sold on the internet.[18] That estimate rose from 1.8% of world trade in 2007. The OECD concluded that despite their improved interception technologies, "the problem of counterfeit and pirated trade has not diminished, but has become a major threat for modern knowledge-based economies."[18]

In the U.S., despite coordinated efforts by Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to stem the influx of counterfeit goods into the U.S, there was a 38% increase in counterfeits seized between 2012 and 2016.[22] In a test survey by the GAO of various items purchased online of major brands, all of which stated they were certified by Underwriters Laboratories, the GAO found that 43% were nonetheless fakes.[22][23]

The approximate cost to the U.S. from counterfeit sales was estimated to be as high $600 billion as of 2016.[15][24] A 2017 report by the Commission on the Theft of American Intellectual Property, stated that China and Hong Kong accounted for 87 percent of counterfeit goods seized entering the United States,[24] and claimed that the Chinese government encourages intellectual property theft.[15][25] Utah Governor Jon Huntsman, who had served as U.S. ambassador to China, stated, "The vast, illicit transfer of American innovation is one of the most significant economic issues impacting U.S. competitiveness that the nation has not fully addressed. It looks to be, must be, a top priority of the new administration."[15] In March 2017 U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order to, among other things, ensure the timely and efficient enforcement of laws protecting Intellectual Property Rights holders from imported counterfeit goods.[26]

An Outside magazine article reminds us of the psychology of sales, and the role of gullible consumers, perhaps blindly ignoring warning signs of a "killer deal", somehow justifying buying an item they know is a fake.[27] While manufacturers and vendors may offer legitimate good deals (factory seconds, product clearance or end-of-season discounts), consumers simply should not expect to buy quality name-brand goods for pennies on the dollar.

Types

Online sales

In a report by the U.S. GAO in 2018, approximately 79 percent of the American population had bought products online.[25] They found numerous products which were sold online by Amazon, Walmart, eBay, Sears and Newegg were counterfeit.[28] For 2017 it was estimated that online sales of counterfeit products amounted to $1.7 trillion.[29] Pew Research Center states that worldwide such e-commerce sales are expected to reach over $4 trillion by 2020. CBP has reported that with e-commerce, consumers often import and export goods and services which allows for more cross-border transactions which gives counterfeiters direct access to consumers.[25]

Internet sales of counterfeit goods has been growing exponentially, according to the International Trademark Association, which lists a number of reasons why:

Criminals prefer to sell counterfeits on the Internet for many reasons. They can hide behind the anonymity of the Internet—with the Dark Web even their IP addresses can be hidden. The Internet gives them the reach to sell to consumers globally—outside of the national limits of law enforcement. This international reach forces brand owners to prosecute cases outside of their local jurisdictions. Counterfeiters can display genuine goods on their site and ship counterfeit goods to the consumer. This makes it difficult for brand owners to even determine if a site is selling counterfeits without making costly purchases from the site. Criminal networks are involved with counterfeiting—which leads to hundreds of sites selling the same products on various servers. Making it an arduous task for the brand owner to stop them without working with authorities to take down the counterfeit rings.[30]

Buyers often know they were victimized from online sales, as over a third (34%) said they were victimized two or three times, and 11% said they had bought fake goods three to five times.[29] While many online sellers such as Amazon are not legally responsible for selling counterfeit goods, when items are brought to their attention by a buyer, they will apply a takedown procedure and quickly remove the product listing from their website.[31][32] This does not seem to be entirely accurate in practice. Counterfeit sellers have a lot of leeway through online commerce.

In buying counterfeit goods directly from other smaller sellers, location is becoming less a factor, since consumers can purchase products from all over the world and have them delivered straight to their doors by regular carriers, such as USPS, FedEx and UPS. Whereas in previous years international counterfeiters had to transport most counterfeits through large cargo shipments, criminals now can use small parcel mail to avoid most inspections.[33]

Apparel and accessories
Counterfeit sports shoes
Counterfeit Rolex watches

Rayban, Rolex, Supreme and Louis Vuitton are the most copied brands worldwide, with Nike being the most counterfeited brand globally according to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Counterfeit clothes, shoes, jewelry and handbags from designer brands are made in varying quality; sometimes the intent is only to fool the gullible buyer who only looks at the label and does not know what the real thing looks like, while others put some serious effort into mimicking fashion details.

Others realize that most consumers do not care if the goods they buy are counterfeit and just wish to purchase inexpensive products. The popularity of designer jeans in 1978, spurred a flood of knockoffs.

Factories that manufacture counterfeit designer brand garments and watches are usually located in developing countries, with between 85-95% of all counterfeit goods coming from China.[34] International tourists visiting Beijing, China, may find a wide selection of counterfeit designer brand garments at the Silk Street. Expensive watches are vulnerable to counterfeiting as well.

In Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam and the Philippines, authentic looking but poor quality watch fakes with self-winding mechanisms and fully working movements can sell for as little as US$20 to good quality ones that sell for $100 and over. Also, some fakes' movements and materials are of remarkably passable quality – albeit inconsistently so – and may look good and work well for some years, a possible consequence of increasing competition within the counterfeiting community.

Some counterfeiters have begun to manufacture their goods in the same factory as the authentic goods. Yuandan goods are those fakes that are produced in the same factory as legitimate designer pieces without authorized permission to do so. These goods are made from scraps and leftover materials from the genuine products, produced illegally, and sold on the black market.[34]

Thailand has opened a Museum of Counterfeit Goods displaying over 4,000 different items, in 14 different categories, which violate trademarks, patents, or copyrights.[35] The oldest museum of this kind is located in Paris and is known as Musée de la Contrefaçon.

In fashion, counterfeit goods are called knock offs. These counterfeit goods are usually sold on markets and street corners. Though purchasing goods might be seemingly harmless to those who are purchasing it knowingly, they are actually funding more dangerous organizations. The National Fraud Intelligence Bureau in England, advices people not to buy counterfeit goods for serious reasons.

Intellectual property is a problem that seems to come up when talking about knock offs in fashion. There are a lot of arguments that talk about how it is stealing the brands logo and prints. On the other side of this argument, many designers believe that counterfeiting is a form of flattery. Virgil Abloh of OFF WHITE famously said, "you can’t copy something that isn’t wanted". Many fashion houses try and stop the knock offs from circulating, Louis Vuitton has an entire team that is just focused on stopping counterfeits. Gucci has adapted the counterfeit culture into its designs, changing the spelling of Gucci to Guccy for its spring summer 2018 collection and painting REAL all over the bags.[36]

Consumers may choose to actively dismiss these unclear origins of product when a trendy style is available for little money. The previous French terrorist attack in 2015 at Charlie Hebdo Newspaper has been traced back to being funded by counterfeit product.[37] According to Tommy Hilfiger's Alastair Grey, terrorists bought the guns used with funds gained from selling illegal luxury sneakers. This is more normal than consumers may think. Grey discusses how often sellers will be overlooked by watch-groups as buying fakes from a distributor in China is less suspicious than other, more extreme criminal activity. The cause and effect of this discounting of crime is giving sellers money to partake in terrorism, human trafficking and child labour.[37] These sellers are difficult to track due to counterfeited shipping papers (they can not be tracked by customs) and fake brands masquerading as a non-descript fashion company that is actually full of fake luxury.

Seized fake handbags at U.S. border

Goods have been brought into the United States without the logos adorned on them in order to get past customs.[38] They are then finished within the country. This is due to the increase in seizing of product at borders. The counterfeiters are reactive to the increasing crackdown on the illegal business practice. Stock-rooms have been replaced with mobile shopping vans that are constantly moving and difficult to track.

Companies like Entrupy are determined to eradicate fake goods with an iPhone application and a standard small camera attachment which uses algorithms to detect even the most indistinguishable "super-fake".[39] Online retailers are also having a difficult time keeping up with monitoring counterfeit items.

Companies all over the internet are illegal e-boutiques that use platforms like eBay, Instagram and Amazon to sell counterfeit goods.[40] Sometimes they own their own websites that have untraceable IP addresses that are often changed.[38] Instagram is a difficult platform to trace as sellers on it take WeChat, PayPal and Venmo and typically talk with clients on platforms like WhatsApp. This all makes the transactions seamless and hard to track since payment is done via third party.[41] Listings are also often posted on the story feature, hence they are not permanent. The problem is getting larger according to Vox and is getting more difficult to monitor.

Amazon has recently partnered with company Project Zero to work with brands to find counterfeit objects on the site.[42] This technology has given private users and companies the capability to gauge handbags certification. Within time, this technology will be widely adaptable to larger platforms. Project Zero offers Amazon partners to flag fake listings without Amazon having to step in.[43] Since Amazon has over five billion listings, a computerized element is also crucial for keeping up with getting rid of fakes. This program scans items based on assets and codes that are provided by Amazon partners and deletes fake items.[44]

Electronics
An authentic Intel flash memory IC (right) and its counterfeit replica (left). Although the packaging of these ICs are the same, an X-ray image reveals that the inside structure of the fake one is different.[45]

Counterfeit electronic components have proliferated in recent years, including integrated circuits (ICs), relays, circuit breakers, fuses, ground fault receptacles, and cable assemblies, as well as connectors. The value of counterfeit electronic components is estimated to total 2% of global sales or $460 billion in 2011.[3] Counterfeit devices have been reverse-engineered (also called a Chinese Blueprint due to its prevalence in China) to produce a product that looks identical and performs like the original, and able to pass physical and electrical tests.[3]

Incidents involving counterfeit ICs has led to the Department of Defense and NASA to create programs to identify bogus parts and prevent them from entering the supply chain.[3] "A failed connector can shut down a satellite as quickly as a defective IC," states product director Robert Hult.[3] Such bogus electronics also pose a significant threat to various sectors of the economy, including the military.[46] In 2012 a U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee report highlighted the risks when it identified approximately 1,800 cases of suspected counterfeit parts in the defense supply chain in 2009 and 2010.[46]

Counterfeit electronic parts can undermine the security and reliability of critical business systems, which can cause massive losses in revenue to companies and damage their reputation.[47] They can also pose major threats to health and safety, as when an implanted heart pacemaker stops,[48] an anti-lock braking system (ABS) fails, or a cell phone battery explodes.[49]

In 2017 the OECD estimated that one in five (19%) of smartphones sold worldwide were counterfeit, with the numbers growing.[50] Alibaba founder Jack Ma said "we need to fight counterfeits the same way we fight drunk driving."[50] In some African countries up to 60% of smartphones are counterfeit.[50] Unfortunately, it is nearly impossible for most consumers to spot a fake since telling the difference requires a higher than average level of technical knowledge.[51] Counterfeit phones cause financial losses for owners and distributors of legitimate devices, and a loss of tax income for governments. In addition, counterfeit phones are poorly made, can generate high radiation, and contain harmful levels of dangerous elements such as lead.[50]

Media

Compact Discs, videotapes and DVDs, computer software and other media that are easily copied can be counterfeited and sold through vendors at street markets,[52] night markets, mail order, and numerous Internet sources, including open auction sites like eBay. In some cases where the counterfeit media has packaging good enough to be mistaken for the genuine product, it is sometimes sold as such. Music enthusiasts may use the term bootleg recording to differentiate otherwise unavailable recordings from counterfeited copies of commercially released material.

In 2014, nearly 30% of the UK population was knowingly or unknowingly involved in some form of piracy, either through streaming content online or buying counterfeit DVDs, with such theft costing the UK audiovisual industries about £500m a year. Counterfeits are particularly harmful to smaller, independent film-makers, who may have spent years raising money for the film. As a result, the value of intellectual property becomes eroded and films are less likely to be made.[53] In 2018, U.S. agents seized more than 70,000 pirated copies of music and movies from a home in Fresno, California. Although it was a relatively small portion of all imported counterfeits, according to one expert:

The United States government has made intellectual property protection a priority. It seems as if every week we see a new seizure of counterfeiting imports. These efforts are helpful and worthwhile, but U.S. officials and law enforcement can only do so much. Seizure of trademark and copyright infringing imports will hardly make a dent in the global piracy of intellectual property rights.[54]

China has been targeted by the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) for distributing pirated movies and television shows. A selection of websites, internet newsgroups, peer-to-peer online networks and physical locations renowned for sharing illegal content, were presented to officials. Other countries were also listed as sources, including Russia, Brazil, Canada, Thailand and Indonesia.[55] In August 2011, it was reported that at least 22 fake Apple Computer stores were operating in parts of China, despite others having been shut down in the past by authorities at other locations.[56] The following month, also in China, it was discovered that people were attempting to re-create the popular mobile game Angry Birds into a theme park without permission from its Finnish copyright or trademark owners.[57]

3D printed products

Counterfeiting of countless items with either large or relatively cheap 3D printers, is a growing problem. The sophisticated printing material and the ever-expanding supply of digital CAD designs available online, will contribute to a black market in counterfeit goods. The Gartner Group estimated that intellectual property loss due to 3D printer counterfeiting could total $100 billion by 2018.[58] Among the technological fields that can be victimized by counterfeits will be auto and aircraft parts, toys, medical devices, drugs and even human organs.[59] According to one intellectual property law firm:

The democratization of manufacturing made possible by 3D printing has the potential to lead to counterfeiting on steroids. And, as 3D printers get better and better, faster and faster, and more and more consumer friendly, anyone can become a counterfeiter.[60]

Along with making illicit parts for almost any major product, the fashion industry has become a major target of counterfeiters using 3D printing. The OHIM in 2017 found that approximately 10% of fashion products sold worldwide are counterfeits, amounting to approximately $28.5 billion of lost revenues per year in Europe alone. Industry leaders feared that budding counterfeiters would soon be creating bags, apparel and jewelry at a lower production cost after gaining access to pirated blueprints or digital files from manufacturers.[61]

Toys

Counterfeit toys leave children exposed to potentially toxic chemicals and the risk of choking. An estimated 10 to 12 per cent of toys sold in the UK in 2017 were counterfeit, with the influx of counterfeit goods coming primarily from China. Trading Standards, a UK safety organization, seizes tens of thousands of toys every month to prevent children coming into contact with them, according to the British Toy and Hobby Association (BTHA).[62]

Australian toy manufacturer Moose Toys have experienced problems with counterfeiting of their popular Shopkins toys in 2015.[63] In 2013, five New York-based companies were accused of importing hazardous and counterfeit toys from China. Merchandise seized included knockoff toys featuring popular children's characters such as Winnie the Pooh, Dora the Explorer, SpongeBob SquarePants, Betty Boop, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, Power Rangers, Spiderman, Tweety, Mickey Mouse and Pokémon.[64] In 2017 the U.S. Customs and Border Protection seized $121,442 worth of counterfeit children's toys that arrived into port from China and was destined for a North Carolina-based importer. The shipment was found to contain multiple items bearing trademarks and copyrights registered to Cartoon Network, Apple Inc., Saban Brands, and Danjaq, LLC.[65]

Pharmaceuticals
Main article: Counterfeit medications
Counterfeit Viagra

According to the U.S. FBI, the counterfeiting of pharmaceuticals accounts for an estimated $600 billion in global trade, and may be the "crime of the 21st century." They add that it "poses significant adverse health and economic consequences for individuals and corporations alike." The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that over 30% of pharmaceuticals in developing countries are fake, stating that "Anyone, anywhere in the world, can come across medicines seemingly packaged in the right way but which do not contain the correct ingredients and, in the worst-case scenario, may be filled with highly toxic substances."[66][67]

About one-third of the world's countries lack effective drug regulatory agencies, which makes them easy prey for counterfeiters. Globally, more than half of counterfeit pharmaceuticals sold are for life-threatening conditions, such as malaria, tuberculosis, HIV/AIDS, and cancer.[20] An estimated one million people die each year from taking toxic counterfeit medication.[20]

With the increase of internet sales, such fake drugs easily cross international boundaries and can be sold directly to unsuspecting buyers. In September 2017, Interpol, after a 10-year investigation, took down 3,584 websites in various countries, removed 3,000 online ads promoting illicit pharmaceuticals, and arrested 400 people.[68]

The majority of online pharmacies taken down did not require a prescription to order the medicines and most sold potentially dangerous bogus versions of real drugs. One target for the operation was the illicit trade in opioid painkillers, especially fentanyl, which is 50 to 100 times stronger than morphine. Counterfeit versions of other narcotics like OxyContin and Percocet also contain fentanyl as a key ingredient. Online pharmacies had flooded the US market and contributed to the opioid epidemic,[68] with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) claiming that sixty-six percent (66%) of the 63,600 overdose deaths in 2016 were caused by opioids, including fentanyl. The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) found that "customers can purchase fentanyl products from Chinese laboratories online with powdered fentanyl and pill presses" which are then shipped directly to buyers via regular mail services such as USPS, DHL, FedEx, and UPS.[69]

Buyers are attracted to rogue online pharmacies since they pose as legitimate businesses.[70] Consumers are motivated by lower prices, and some are attracted by the ability to obtain prescription drugs without a prescription. Of the drugs bought online, however, 90 percent are found to come from a country different from one the website claims.[20] A 2018 report by the DHS

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) defines counterfeit drugs as those sold under a product name without proper authorization:

"Counterfeiting can apply to both brand name and generic products, where the identity of the source is mislabeled in a way that suggests that it is the authentic approved product. Counterfeit products may include products without the active ingredient, with an insufficient or excessive quantity of the active ingredient, with the wrong active ingredient, or with fake packaging."[71]

According to The Economist, between 15%-30% of antibiotic drugs in Africa and South-East Asia are fake, while the UN estimated in 2013 that roughly half of the antimalarial drugs sold in Africa—worth some $438m a year—are counterfeit.[72] In early 2018 29 tons in counterfeit medicine were seized by Interpol in Niger.[73]

Pfizer Pharmaceuticals has found fake versions of at least 20 of its products, such as Viagra and Lipitor, in the legitimate supply chains of at least 44 countries. Pfizer also found that nearly 20% of Europeans had obtained medicines through illicit channels, amounting to $12.8 billion in sales. Other experts estimate the global market for fake medications could be worth between $75 billion and $200 billion a year, as of 2010.[74]

Other prescription drugs that have been counterfeited are Plavix, used to treat blood clots, Zyprexa for schizophrenia, Casodex, used to treat prostate cancer, Tamiflu, used to treat influenza, including Swine flu, and Aricept, used to treat Alzheimers.[75] The EU reported that as of 2005 India was by far the biggest supplier of fake drugs, accounting for 75 percent of the global cases of counterfeit medicine. However, many drugs and other consumer products that were supposedly made in India, were actually made in China and imported into India.[76]

Another 7% came from Egypt and 6% from China. Those involved in their production and distribution include "medical professionals" such as corrupt pharmacists and physicians, organized crime syndicates, rogue pharmaceutical companies, corrupt local and national officials, and terrorist organizations.[12]

Food

Food fraud, "the intentional adulteration of food with cheaper ingredients for economic gain," is a well-documented crime that has existed in the U.S. and Europe for many decades. It has only received more attention in recent years as the fear of bioterrorism has increased. Numerous cases of intentional food fraud have been discovered over the last few years. As of 2013, the foods most commonly listed as adulterated or mislabelled in the United States Pharmacopeia Convention's Food Fraud Database were: milk, olive oil, honey, saffron, fish, coffee, orange juice, apple juice, black pepper, and tea.[77] A 2014 report by the U.S. Congressional Research Service listed the leading food categories with reported cases of fraud as olive oil; fish and seafood; milk and milk-based products; honey, maple syrup, and other natural sweeteners; fruit juice; coffee and tea; spices; organic foods and products; and clouding agents.[78]

United States
  • In 2008, U.S. consumers were "panicked" and a "media firestorm" ensued when Chinese milk was discovered to have been adulterated with the chemical melamine, to make milk appear to have a higher protein content in government tests. It caused 900 infants to be hospitalized with six deaths.[79]
  • In 2007, the University of North Carolina found that 77 percent of fish labeled as red snapper was actually tilapia, a common and less flavorful species. The Chicago Sun-Times tested fish at 17 sushi restaurants found that fish being sold as red snapper actually was mostly tilapia. Other inspections uncovered catfish being sold as grouper, which normally sells for nearly twice as much as catfish.[79] Fish is the most frequently faked food Americans buy, which includes "...selling a cheaper fish, such as pen-raised Atlantic salmon, as wild Alaska salmon." In one test, Consumer Reports found that less than half of supposedly "wild-caught" salmon sold in 2005-2006 were actually wild, and the rest were farmed.[80]
  • French cognac was discovered to have been adulterated with brandy, and their honey was mixed with cheaper sugars, such as high-fructose corn syrup.[79]
  • In 2008, U.S. food safety officers seized more than 10,000 cases of counterfeit extra virgin olive oil, worth more than $700,000, from warehouses in New York and New Jersey.[79] Olive oil is considered one of the most frequently counterfeited food products, according to the FDA, with one study finding that a lot of products labeled as "extra-virgin olive oil" actually contained up to 90% soybean oil.[80]
  • From 2010 until 2012 the conservation group Oceana analyzed 1,200 seafood samples from 674 retail outlets in 21 U.S. states. A third of the samples contained the DNA of a different type of fish to the one stated on the product label.[81] They found that fish with high levels of mercury such as tilefish and king mackerel were being passed off as relatively safe fish like grouper. Snapper (87%) and tuna (59%) were the most commonly mislabeled species.[82]
  • Genetic testing by the Boston Globe in 2011 found widespread mislabelling of fish served in area restaurants.[83]

The Food and Drug Administration, the primary regulatory body for food safety and enforcement in the United States, admits that the "sheer magnitude of the potential crime" makes prevention difficult, along with the fact that food safety is not treated as a high priority. They note that with more than 300 ports of entry through which 13 percent of America's food supply passes, the FDA is only able to inspect about 2 percent of that food.[79]

New U.S. seafood tracing regulations were announced by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in 2015.[84]

Europe

Food counterfeiting is a serious threat in Europe, especially for countries with a high number of trademark products such as Italy. In 2005, EU customs seized more than 75 million counterfeited goods, including foods, medicines and other goods, partly due to Internet sales. More than 5 million counterfeit food-related items, including drinks and alcohol products, were seized. According to the EU's taxation and customs commissioner, "A secret wave of dangerous fakes is threatening the people in Europe."[85]

Wine

In China, counterfeit high-end wines are a growing beverage industry segment, where fakes are sold to Chinese consumers.[86] Knock-off artists refill empty bottles from famous chateaux with inferior vintages. According to one source, "Upwardly mobile Chinese, eager to display their wealth and sophistication, have since developed a taste for imported wine along with other foreign luxuries." In China, wine consumption more than doubled since 2005, making China the seventh-largest market in the world.[87]

The methods used to dupe innocent consumers includes photocopying labels, creating different and phony chateaux names on the capsule and the label. Sometimes authentic bottles are used but another wine is added by using a syringe. The problem is so widespread in China, the U.S. and Europe, that auction house Christie's has begun smashing empty bottles with a hammer to prevent them from entering the black market. During one sale in 2008, a French vintner was "shocked to discover that '106 bottles out of 107' were fakes." According to one source, counterfeit French wines sold locally and abroad "could take on a much more serious amplitude in Asia because the market is developing at a dazzling speed." Vintners are either unable or hesitant to fight such counterfeiters: "There are no funds. Each lawsuit costs 500,000 euros," states one French vintner. In addition, some vintners, like product and food manufacturers, prefer to avoid any publicity regarding fakes to avoid injuring their brand names.[88]

Counterfeit wine is also found in the West, although primarily a problem for collectors of rare wine. Famous examples of counterfeiting include the case of Hardy Rodenstock, who was involved with the so-called "Jefferson bottles,"[89] and Rudy Kurniawan, who was indicted in March 2012 for attempting to sell faked bottles of La Tâche from Domaine de la Romanée-Conti and Clos St. Denis from Domaine Ponsot.[90] In both cases, the victims of the fraud were high-end wine collectors, including Bill Koch, who sued both Rodenstock and Kurniawan over fake wines sold both at auction and privately.

Cosmetics

U.S. Customs and Border Protection suggest that the cosmetic industry is losing about $75 million annually based on the amount of imitation products that are smuggled into the U.S. each year. In addition to the lost revenue, cosmetics brands are damaged when consumers experience unhealthy side effects, such as eye infections or allergic reactions, from counterfeit products.[91]

Customs agents seized more than 2,000 shipments of counterfeit beauty products in 2016, and noted that fake personal care items were more common than knockoff handbags. One of the biggest threats to beauty consumers is the risk that they are buying counterfeit products on familiar 3rd party retail platforms like Amazon.[91]

Cigarettes

Illicit cigarettes are an example of the multi-pronged threat of counterfeiting, providing hundreds of millions of dollars per year to terrorist groups[92] Counterfeit cigarettes cost taxpayers in every nation billions in lost revenues while foisting on an unsuspecting public a product found to contain toxic substances like faeces, asbestos and dead flies.[93]

The harm arising from this amalgam of contaminants sits on top of any baseline hazard ascribed to commercial tobacco products. With the sales of illicit cigarettes in Turkey, for example, exceeding 16.2 billion cigarettes per year, Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan labeled counterfeit tobacco as "more dangerous than terrorism".[94]

Military items

According to a U.S. Senate committee report in 2012 and reported by ABC News, "counterfeit electronic parts from China are 'flooding' into critical U.S. military systems, including special operations helicopters and surveillance planes, and are putting the nation's troops at risk." The report notes that Chinese companies take discarded electronic parts from other nations, remove any identifying marks, wash and refurbish them, and then resell them as brand-new – "a practice that poses a significant risk to the performance of U.S. military systems.[95][96]

It must be noted in this case however that it is usually not the components themselves which are counterfeit: they have in most instances been fabricated by the expected manufacturer or by a licensee who has paid for the appropriate intellectual property. Rather, what is fraudulent is the issuing by the reseller of a Certificate of Conformity that claims that their provenance is traceable, sometimes accompanied by the components being remarked to make it appear that they have been manufactured and tested to more stringent standards than is actually the case.

There have, however, been situations where components have been fully counterfeit. A fairly typical example is that of USB to Serial port "dongles" ostensibly manufactured by FTDI, Prolific and others which in practice contain a general-purpose microcontroller which has been programmed to implement the same programming interface to a greater or lesser extent. Another example is that of electrolytic capacitors which have been sold as originating from a highly regarded manufacturer but in practice are merely shells which contain a lower-specification (and physically smaller) component internally.

Other counterfeit product categories

These include items which purport to be original art, designer watches, designer china, accessories such as sunglasses and handbags, and all varieties of antiques. In some cases the copying process has proceeded through several vendors, and it is possible to see gradual changes as the cain of "counterfeits of couterfeits" progresses.

These products frequently show up for sale on online sites such as Amazon and eBay. Efforts to report them as fraudulent receive little response.

Enforcement

United States

On November 29, 2010, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security seized and shut down 82 websites as part of a U.S. crackdown of websites that sell counterfeit goods, and was timed to coincide with "Cyber Monday," the start of the holiday online shopping season.[97] Attorney General Eric Holder announced that "by seizing these domain names, we have disrupted the sale of thousands of counterfeit items, while also cutting off funds to those willing to exploit the ingenuity of others for their own personal gain."[98] Members of Congress proposed a PROTECT IP Act to block access to foreign Web sites offering counterfeit goods.

Some U.S. politicians are proposing to fine those who buy counterfeit goods, such as those sold in New York's Canal Street market. In Europe, France has already created stiff sentences for sellers or buyers, with punishments up to 3 years in prison and a $300,000 fine.[99] Also in Europe, non-profit organizations such as the European Anti-Counterfeiting Network, fight the global trade in counterfeit goods.[100]

During a counterfeit bust in New York in 2007, federal police seized $200 million in fake designer clothing, shoes, and accessories from one of the largest-ever counterfeit smuggling rings. Labels seized included Chanel, Nike, Burberry, Polo, Ralph Lauren and Baby Phat. Counterfeit goods are a "...major plague for fashion and luxury brands," and numerous companies have made legal efforts to block the sale of counterfeits from China. Many of the goods are sold to retail outlets in Brooklyn and Queens.[101]

For trademark owners wishing to identify and prevent the importation of counterfeit goods, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection agency supports a supplemental registration of trademarks through their Intellectual Property Rights e-Recordation program.[102][103] In 2017 U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order to, among other things, ensure the timely and efficient enforcement of laws protecting Intellectual Property Rights holders from imported counterfeit goods.[26]

Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA)

In October 2011, a bill was introduced entitled Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA). If the bill had been passed, it would have expanded the ability of U.S. law enforcement and copyright holders to fight online trafficking in copyrighted intellectual property and counterfeit goods. The bill would have allowed the U.S. Department of Justice, as well as copyright holders, to seek court orders against websites accused of enabling or facilitating copyright infringement. Opponents of the bill stated that it could have crippled the Internet through selective censorship and limiting free speech. In regards to the bill, the Obama administration stressed that "the important task of protecting intellectual property online must not threaten an open and innovative internet."[104] The legislation was later withdrawn by its author, Rep. Lamar Smith."[105]

International

On October 1, 2011, the governments of eight nations including Japan and the United States signed the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), which is designed to help protect intellectual property rights, especially costly copyright and trademark theft. The signing took place a year after diligent negotiations among 11 governments: Australia, Canada, the European Union, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Mexico, Morocco, New Zealand, Singapore, Switzerland and the United States. The EU, Mexico, Switzerland and China have not yet signed the agreement.[106] Due to the latter, critics evaluated the agreement as insubstantial.[107][108]

In China counterfeiting is so deeply rooted that crackdowns on shops selling counterfeit cause public protests during which the authorities are derided as "bourgeois puppets of foreigners."[109] Countries like Nigeria fight brand trademark infringement on a national level but the penalties are dwarfed by the earnings outlook for counterfeiters: "As grievous as this crime is, which is even worse than armed robbery, the penalty is like a slap on the palm, the most ridiculous of which is a fine of 50,000 naira ($307). Any offender would gladly pay this fine and return to business the next day."[110]

In early 2018 Interpol confiscated tonnes of fake products worth $25 million and arrested hundreds of suspects and broke up organized crime networks in 36 different countries on four continents. They raided markets, chemists, retail outlets, warehouses and border control points, where they seized among other things, pharmaceuticals, food, vehicle parts, tobacco products, clothing, and agrochemicals. Over 7.2 million counterfeit and illicit items weighing more than 120 tonnes were confiscated.[111]

Human rights laws

Counterfeit products are often produced in violation of basic human rights and child labor laws and human rights laws, as they are often created in illegal sweatshops.[112] Clothing manufacturers often rely on sweatshops using children in what some consider "slave labor" conditions. According to one organization, there are some 3,000 such sweatshops in and around Buenos Aires, Argentina.[113] Author Dana Thomas described the conditions she witnessed in other country's sweatshops, noting that children workers are often smuggled into countries and sold into labor:

I remember walking into an assembly plant in Thailand a couple of years ago and seeing six or seven little children, all under 10 years old, sitting on the floor assembling counterfeit leather handbags. The owners had broken the children's legs and tied the lower leg to the thigh so the bones wouldn't mend. [They] did it because the children said they wanted to go outside and play. . . I went on a raid in a sweatshop in Brooklyn, and illegal workers were hiding in a rat hole, [and] impossible to know how old the workers were.[114]

U.S. Supreme Court justice Sonia Sotomayor, who has tried to prosecute counterfeiters, notes that major industries have suffered the loss of hundreds of thousands of jobs due to the exploitation of child labor in sweatshops in New York and Asia. Those often produce dangerous merchandise, such as fake auto parts or toys, made of toxic and easily breakable materials.[115]

The profits often support terrorist groups,[116] drug cartels,[117] people smugglers[118] and street gangs.[119] The FBI has found evidence that a portion of the financing of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing came from a store selling counterfeit T-shirts.[115] The same has been found surrounding many other organized crime activities. According to Bruce Foucart, director of US Homeland Security's National Intellectual Property Coordination Centre, the sales of counterfeit goods funded the Charlie Hebdo attack of 2016 in Paris, which left 12 people dead and nearly a dozen more injured.[34] Sales of pirated CDs have been linked to funding the 2004 Madrid train bombing, and investigations firm Carratu connects money from counterfeit goods to Hezbollah, Al Qaeda, the Japanese Yakuza, the ETA, and the Russian Mob.

The crackdown on counterfeit goods has not only become a matter of human rights but one of national and international security in various countries. The FBI has called product counterfeiting "the crime of the 21st century."[120]

Internet shopping sites

Major Internet shopping sites, such as Amazon.com, eBay.com, and Alibaba.com, provide complaint pages where listings of counterfeit goods can be reported. The reporter must show that it owns the intellectual property (e.g. trademark, patent, copyright) being presented on the counterfeit listings. The shopping site will then do an internal investigation and if it agrees, it will take the counterfeit listing down.[121][122] The actual execution of such investigations, at least, on Amazon and eBay, seems to be limited in reality.

Instagram spambots featuring Louis Vuitton, selling counterfeit luxury items of different brands
Instagram spambots featuring profile keywords and posting techniques
Instagram spambot featuring sellers who embedded their contact details on published images
Russian-based website specializing in Chanel bags at cheaper prices

Social media platforms

Besides, online market sites, the shift to digital for luxury and consumer goods have led to both promising opportunities and serious risks. The British government, released a study, Social Media and Luxury Goods Counterfeit, stating 1/5 of all items tagged with luxury good brand names on Instagram are fakes, with 20% of the posts featured counterfeit goods from accounts, usually based in China, Russia, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Ukraine. It also highlights the scale, impact, and characteristics of infringement, and that sophistication from counterfeiters continues to grow through social media platforms.[123] In 2016, in a span of 3-day period, Instagram has identified 20,892 fake accounts selling counterfeit goods, collectively responsible for 14.5 million posts, 146,958 new images and gaining 687,817 new followers, with Chanel (13.90%), Prada (9.69%) and Louis Vuitton (8.51%) being the top affected brands, according to Social Media and Luxury Goods Counterfeit: a growing concern for government, industry and consumers worldwide study from The Washington Post.[124]

Social media and mobile applications have turned into ideal platforms for transactions and trades. Counterfeit users and sellers would set up online accounts on Instagram, Twitter, and Facebook and post counterfeit or illicit products through ways of sponsored ads and deals. The consumer can easily contact buyers and purchase the counterfeit goods unknowingly, by email, WhatsApp, WeChat, and PayPal. As social media watchdogs and groups are working on cracking and shutting down accounts selling counterfeit goods, counterfeiters continue to operate 24 hours, with advanced systems in algorithms, artificial intelligence, and spambots, also tactics involving automatic account creation, avoid in detection and tax-and-duty-free law. It is advised by many that brands, tech platforms, governments and consumers require a comprehensive strategy and cross-sector collaboration to combat the multifaceted system enabling the international counterfeit market.[125]

So far, only United Kingdom, Scotland and Erie representatives have taken the initiatives by using law enforcement and criminal charges to fight against counterfeiting and piracy on social media accounts.[126] This concern still needs tremendous effort in updating its enforcement policies in online counterfeiting, below are some emerging solutions suggested by World Trademark Review:

  • Social media surveillance – New technical filters and deploy further resources; engaging in open information sharing; and promoting broader awareness in public campaigns
  • Continued enforcement measures – Rogue website actions; customs training and cooperation with law enforcement; and addressing counterfeit goods at the source
  • Reinforce in postal service – advance data screening for mail parcels and shipments
  • Adopting a set of best practices in payment processors
  • Collaborate with third-party cooperation for reliance

Anti-counterfeiting packaging

Packaging can be engineered to help reduce the risks of package pilferage or the theft and resale of products: Some package constructions are more resistant to pilferage and some have pilfer indicating seals. Counterfeit consumer goods, unauthorized sales (diversion), material substitution and tampering can all be reduced with these anti-counterfeiting technologies. Packages may include authentication seals and use security printing to help indicate that the package and contents are not counterfeit; these too are subject to counterfeiting. Packages also can include anti-theft devices, such as dye-packs, RFID tags, or electronic article surveillance[127] tags that can be activated or detected by devices at exit points and require specialized tools to deactivate. Anti-counterfeiting technologies that can be used with packaging include:

  • 2D barcodes - data codes that can be tracked
  • Color shifting ink or film - visible marks that switch colors or texture when tilted
  • DNA tracking - genes embedded onto labels that can be traced
  • Encrypted micro-particles - unpredictably placed markings (numbers, layers, and colors) not visible to the human eye
  • Forensic markers
  • Holograms - graphics printed on seals, patches, foils or labels and used at point of sale for visual verification
  • Kinetic diffraction grating images
  • Micro-printing - second line authentication often used on currencies
  • NFC (Near Field Communication) tagging for authentication - short-range wireless connectivity that stores information between devices
  • Overt and covert feature
  • QR code
  • Security pigments and inks - marks only visible under ultraviolet light and is not under normal lighting conditions
  • Serialized barcodes
  • Tactile prints - dots printed directly onto surface of the product, provide embossed finishes to highlight specific design features
  • Tamper evident seals and tapes - destructible or graphically verifiable at point of sale
  • Taggant fingerprinting - uniquely coded microscopic materials that are verified from a database
  • Track and trace systems - use codes to link products to database tracking system
  • Water indicators - become visible when contacted with water

With the increasing sophistication of counterfeiters techniques, there is an increasing need for designers and technologists to develop even more creative solutions to distinguish genuine products from frauds, incorporating unique and less obvious aspects of identification into the design of goods. One of the most impressive of techniques exploits anisotropic optical characteristics of conjugated polymers.[128] Engineers have developed specialized markings and patterns that can be incorporated within the designs of textiles that can only be detected under polarized lights. Similar to methods implemented in the production of currency, invisible threads and dyes are used to create unique designs within the weaves of luxury textiles that cannot be replicated by counterfeiters due to a unique set of fibres, anisotropic tapes, and polymer dyes used by the brand and manufacturer.[128]

gollark: I said compile, they said run, QED.
gollark: Haskell is safe and side-effect-free because nobody has ever compiled a Haskell program.
gollark: So you can use C++ safely, if you use it as if it's annoying Rust.
gollark: Which is a major thing.
gollark: They can't just *accidentally* introduce dark bee god invocation, though.

See also

References
  1. "Global trade in fake goods worth nearly half a trillion dollars a year", OECD
  2. Chaudhry, Peggy E., Zimmerman, Alan. The Economics of Counterfeit Trade: Governments, Consumers, Pirates and Intellectual Property Rights, Springer Science & Business Media (2009)
  3. "Challenging the Counterfeit Connector Conundrum", Connector Supplier, November 4, 2013
  4. "The spread of counterfeiting: Knock-offs catch on" Economist magazine, March 4, 2010
  5. "Crackdown on counterfeiting", International Organization for Standardization (ISO), January 8, 2014
  6. Sanchez, Julian (October 8, 2008). "750,000 lost jobs? The dodgy digits behind the war on piracy". Ars Technica. Retrieved December 16, 2017.
  7. "Product counterfeiting puts consumer safety at risk" Archived January 15, 2011, at the Wayback Machine, Underwriters Laboratories (UL)
  8. "Global trade in fake goods worth nearly half a trillion dollars a year - OECD & EUIPO", OECD, April 18, 2016
  9. "Knocked out by knock-offs: Counterfeit products, mostly from China, are hurting Indian brands", DNA India, January 31, 2018
  10. "How Chinese counterfeiting hurts India", Asia Times', June 26, 2018
  11. "Knock-off the Knockoffs: The Fight Against Trademark and Copyright Infringement", Illinois Business Law Journal, September 21, 2009
  12. The Economic Impact of Counterfeiting and Piracy, OECD (2008)
  13. "Global Impacts Study | ICC - International Chamber of Commerce". www.iccwbo.org. Archived from the original on June 1, 2020. Retrieved February 24, 2016.
  14. "Counterfeit Goods Shaving Billions From Italian Economy", Financial Tribune, June 27, 2018
  15. "Counterfeit Goods Cost the U.S. $600 Billion a Year", Inc, AP, February 27, 2017
  16. "Meet The Man Fighting America's Trade War Against Chinese Counterfeits (It's Not Trump)", Forbes, March 29, 2018
  17. "Combating trademark and product piracy". Zoll online. Archived from the original on February 5, 2007. Retrieved December 6, 2006.
  18. "Trade in Counterfeit and Pirated Goods: Mapping the Economic Impact", OECD, April 18, 2016
  19. "Sale of fake goods hits alarming level", The Edge Markets, April 2, 2018
  20. "Fighting counterfeit pharmaceuticals: New defenses for an underestimated - and growing - menace", Strategy&, June 29, 2017
  21. "Counterfeit goods: How to tell the real from the rip-off". Archived from the original on June 1, 2020. Retrieved June 2, 2017.
  22. "U.S. Customs Needs To Share More Info on Counterfeits With Online Retailers", Nextgov, March 6, 2018
  23. "Popular goods sold through Amazon, Walmart and others are counterfeits: Government report", CBS News, February 26, 2018
  24. "IP Commission Report", The National Bureau of Asian Research, 2017
  25. "Intellectual Property: Agencies Can Improve Efforts to Address Risks Posed by Changing Counterfeits Market", U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), January 2018
  26. "Presidential Executive Order on Establishing Enhanced Collection and Enforcement of Antidumping and Countervailing Duties and Violations of Trade and Customs Laws", Whitehouse.gov, March 31, 2017
  27. Lindsey, Joe (May 10, 2016). "RFID Tags Won't Stop Counterfeiting". Outside Online. Retrieved September 16, 2018.
  28. "New warning of counterfeit products sold online", ABC News, February 28, 2018
  29. "One-Third of Online Shoppers Victims of Counterfeit Sales", 24/7 Wall St., December 18, 2017
  30. "Addressing the Sale of Counterfeits on the Internet", International Trademark Association, 2018
  31. "Amazon May Have a Counterfeit Problem", The Atlantic, April 20, 2018
  32. "Amazon's Chinese counterfeit problem is getting worse", CNBC, July 8, 2016
  33. "What We Know – and What We Don’t – About Counterfeit Goods and Small Parcels", The Global IP Center, March 7, 2018
  34. "Counterfeit Fashion Is Funding Terrorism, Sweatshops, and Untold Human Misery". Esquire. December 21, 2016. Retrieved April 3, 2017.
  35. "Museum of Counterfeit Goods", Tilleke & Gibbins International, Thailand, accessed March 8, 2014
  36. "Is Counterfeiting Actually Good for Fashion? | Highsnobiety". Highsnobiety. October 31, 2018. Retrieved October 31, 2018.
  37. Gray, Alastair, How fake handbags fund terrorism and organized crime, retrieved October 26, 2019
  38. Thomas, Dana (January 9, 2009). "The Fight Against Fakes". Harper's BAZAAR. Retrieved October 26, 2019.
  39. Mau, Dhani. "Can Technology Keep Fake Handbags Out of the Marketplace?". Fashionista. Retrieved October 26, 2019.
  40. Street, Mikelle (December 21, 2016). "Counterfeit Fashion Is Funding Terrorism, Sweatshops, and Untold Human Misery". Esquire. Retrieved October 26, 2019.
  41. Lieber, Chavie (May 2, 2019). "Instagram has a counterfeit fashion problem". Vox. Retrieved October 26, 2019.
  42. Lee, Adriana (March 1, 2019). "Amazon Weaponizes Brands, AI in Fight Against Fakes". WWD. Retrieved October 26, 2019.
  43. "Amazon launches new tools that allow brands to proactively fight counterfeiting". TechCrunch. Retrieved October 26, 2019.
  44. Lee, Adriana (3/4/19). "Amazon Weaponizes Brands, AI in Fight Against Fakes". Women's Wear Daily. Check date values in: |date= (help)
  45. Ahi, Kiarash (May 13, 2015). Anwar, Mehdi F; Crowe, Thomas W; Manzur, Tariq (eds.). "Terahertz characterization of electronic components and comparison of terahertz imaging with X-ray imaging techniques". SPIE Sensing Technology+ Applications. Terahertz Physics, Devices, and Systems IX: Advanced Applications in Industry and Defense. 9483: 94830K–94830K–15. doi:10.1117/12.2183128.
  46. "The Serious Risks From Counterfeit Electronic Parts", Forbes, July 11, 2012
  47. Tehranipoor, Mark. Counterfeit Integrated Circuits: Detection and Avoidance, Springer (2015) p. 5
  48. "Counterfeit Products On The Rise", Robert J. McGuirl Law Firm
  49. "Exploding Cell Phones Spur Recalls", CBS News, October 28, 2014
  50. "New Tricks Needed to Stop the €45 Billion Counterfeit Smartphone Market", Developing Telecoms, November 9, 2017
  51. "Top 5 reasons why counterfeit goods are getting harder to spot", IP Watchdog, June 26, 2018
  52. Eichhofer, André (June 13, 2012). "Dealers Do Roaring Trade in Fake Euro 2012 Goods". Der Spiegel. Retrieved June 13, 2012.
  53. "Movie piracy: threat to the future of films intensifies", The Guardian, July 17, 2014
  54. "Nearly $1 Million Worth of Counterfeit Movies and Music Seized", Chester Law, March 20, 2018
  55. "China is still a notorious market for movie and TV show piracy, report says", South China Morning Post, October 29, 2013
  56. "22 more fake Apple stores found in Kunming, China, says report", CBS News, August 11, 2011
  57. "China steals "Angry Birds" for theme park", CBS News, September 16, 2011
  58. "Illegal, Immoral, and Here to Stay Counterfeiting and the 3D Printing Revolution", Wired, February 20, 2015
  59. "Germany: Counterfeiting, 3D printing and the third Industrial Revolution", World Trademark Review, January 1, 2017
  60. "How to Tell What’s Real and What’s Fake in a 3D Printed World", 3D Printing Industry, Feb. 5, 2014
  61. "The New World of 3D Printing … and Counterfeiting", The Fashion Law, March 28, 2017
  62. "A deluge of counterfeit toys is leaving children exposed to toxic chemicals, safety experts warn", I News, January 23, 2018
  63. PR Newswire, "Police Raid Chinese Toy Factory: Moose Enterprise and Local Police Seize Over 150,000 Counterfeit Shopkins Toys in China", July 31, 2015
  64. "5 accused of importing counterfeit, hazardous toys", CNN, February 7, 2013
  65. "Charleston CBP Seizes Counterfeit Toys", U.S. Customs and Border Protection, July 26, 2017
  66. "Counterfeit Pharmaceuticals and Public Health" Archived July 8, 2013, at the Wayback Machine, Michigan State Univ., Public Health dept
  67. Shafy, Samiha (January 30, 2008). "Counterfeit drugs consist of pills, drops and ointments containing either incorrect active ingredients or none at all. Sometimes the active ingredients are so diluted that the drugs are completely ineffective". Der Spiegel. Retrieved January 30, 2008.
  68. "Latest Interpol-led Pangea op nets rogue pharmacies", Securing Industry, September 26, 2017
  69. "Combatting the Opioid Crisis: Exploiting Vulnerabilities in International Mail", Report of the Committee on Homeland Security, January 24, 2018
  70. Blackstone, EA; Fuhr, JP Jr; Pociask, S (2014). "The health and economic effects of counterfeit drugs". Am Health Drug Benefits. 7 (4): 216–24. PMC 4105729. PMID 25126373.
  71. "Counterfeit Drugs Questions and Answers" FDA
  72. "Counterfeit drugs raise Africa’s temperature", AfricaRenewal, U.N., May 2013
  73. "Interpol: Raids in 36 countries yield $25M in fake goods", Seattle Times, July 12, 2018
  74. "Poison pills" Economist magazine, September 2, 2010
  75. "News Releases" Archived February 20, 2011, at the Wayback Machine U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, January 15, 2009
  76. "Customs seize Chinese cargo with fake 'made-in-India' products", The Times of India, July 17, 2009
  77. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on October 22, 2018. Retrieved June 28, 2016.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  78. "Food Fraud and "Economically Motivated Adulteration" of Food and Food Ingredients". Congressional Research Service. January 10, 2014. Retrieved January 19, 2020.
  79. Jeneen Interlandi (February 8, 2010). "The fake-food detectives". Newsweek. Archived from the original on October 21, 2010.
  80. "Something fishy? Counterfeit foods enter the U.S. market" USA Today, January 23, 2009
  81. "Oceana study reveals seafood fraud nationwide". Oceana. February 2013. Retrieved May 2, 2016.
  82. "Oceana study reveals seafood fraud nationwide" (PDF). Oceana. February 2013. Retrieved May 2, 2016.
  83. "Globe investigation finds widespread seafood mislabeling".
  84. Abel, David (March 16, 2015). "US aims to curb seafood fraud". Boston Globe.
  85. "Counterfeit food a 'serious threat' says EC" MeatProcess.com, November 13, 2006
  86. Paull, John (2012) "China fakes Australian premium organic wine", Organic News, June 26.
  87. "Pricey counterfeit labels proliferate as China wine market booms" Los Angeles Times, January 14, 2012
  88. "After luxury bags, counterfeit luxury wines", Luxuo.com, November 22, 2009
  89. The New Yorker, September 3, 2007: The Jefferson Bottles, p. 2
  90. "USA v. Kurniawan" (PDF). Retrieved July 7, 2012.
  91. "Fake makeup can be an easy buy – and a health hazard", CBS, December 6, 2017
  92. "Illicit cigarette tracking and the financing of organized crime". Police Chief magazine. 2004.
  93. "Human excrement, asbestos and dead flies: the ingredients found in fake cigarettes that cost the taxpayer billions". Mail Online. 2012.
  94. "Smoke and mirrors in Turkey with illicit cigarette trade". Thenational.ae. Retrieved July 21, 2014.
  95. "Counterfeit Chinese Parts Slipping Into U.S. Military Aircraft: Report", ABC News, May 22, 2012
  96. "Senate Armed Services Committee Releases Report on Counterfeit Electronic Parts" Archived June 1, 2012, at the Wayback Machine, U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee Report, May 21, 2012
  97. "U.S. Shutters 82 Sites in Crackdown on Downloads, Counterfeit Goods" Wired magazine, November 29, 2010
  98. "Federal Courts Order Seizure of 82 Website Domains" U.S. Dept. of Justice Press Release, November 29, 2010
  99. "French warning on counterfeits: don't sell 'em, don't buy 'em" Archived September 3, 2011, at the Wayback Machine, Applied DNA Sciences, May 3, 2011
  100. "European Anti-Counterfeiting Network". REACT. Retrieved January 17, 2014.
  101. "Counterfeit Luxury: Feds Bust Largest-Ever Counterfeit Smuggling Ring." Archived May 5, 2011, at the Wayback Machine Second City Style, December 6, 2007
  102. "U.S. Customs and Border Protection Intellectual Property Rights e-Recordation Application" (PDF). U.S. Customs and Border Protection. 2006. Retrieved February 11, 2010.
  103. Curry, Sheree (May 13, 1996). "Farewell, My Logo: A Detective Story - Counterfeiting Name Brands is Shaping Up as the Crime of the 21st Century. It Costs U.S. Companies $200 Billion a Year". Fortune. Retrieved February 11, 2010.
  104. "Obama Administration Responds to We the People Petitions on SOPA and Online Piracy", The White House Blog, January 14, 2012
  105. "SOPA author withdraws controversial anti-piracy bill". Memeburn.com. January 23, 2012. Retrieved January 17, 2014.
  106. "Anti-counterfeiting agreement signed in Tokyo", Reuters, October 1, 2011
  107. "ACTA is worthless without Chinese involvement", The Inquirer, October 7, 2010
  108. "EU defends final Acta text on counterfeiting", EUObserver.com, October 7, 2010
  109. LaFraniere, Sharon (March 1, 2009). "Facing Counterfeiting Crackdown, Beijing Vendors Fight Back". The New York Times. Retrieved March 2, 2009.
  110. "Counterfeit drugs making nonsense of medical practice in Nigeria", Nigerian Health Journal, July 16, 2011
  111. "Interpol seizes 25 mln USD fake goods in worldwide operations", China.org, July 13, 2018
  112. "Counterfeiting: Many Risks and Many Victims", CNBC, July 13, 2010
  113. "Garment Sweatshops in Argentina an Open Secret", Inter Press Service, May 30, 2015
  114. Thomas, Dana. Deluxe: How Luxury Lost Its Luster, Penguin (2007) p. 288
  115. Felix, Antonia. Sonia Sotomayor: The True American Dream, Penguin (2010) e-book
  116. "Counterfeit goods are linked to terror groups - Business - International Herald Tribune". The New York Times. February 12, 2007.
  117. Borunda, Daniel (April 19, 2012). "Mexican drug cartels tap counterfeit market". El Paso Times. Archived from the original on September 13, 2012. Retrieved January 17, 2014.
  118. "According to the Spanish authorities, cases involving counterfeit products are often linked to the organisation of illegal immigration" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on April 10, 2011. Retrieved June 3, 2009.
  119. "Counterfeit goods fund violent gang activity | abc7.com". Abclocal.go.com. June 10, 2010. Archived from the original on August 11, 2012. Retrieved January 17, 2014.
  120. "MSU LAUNCHES FIRST ANTI-COUNTERFEITING RESEARCH PROGRAM", MSU Today, Michigan State University, February 8, 2010
  121. "Nowotarski, Mark, "The Power of Policing Trademarks and Design Patents", IPWatchdog, 25 September 2013". Ipwatchdog.com. September 25, 2013. Retrieved August 24, 2014.
  122. Harris, Dan (April 21, 2013). "Harris, Dan, "How to Stop China Counterfeiting, Or At Least Reduce It", ChinaLawBlog, 21 April 2013". Chinalawblog.com. Retrieved August 24, 2014.
  123. Share and share alike: the challenges from social media for intellectual property rights. UK Government: Intellectual Property Office. 2017. pp. 1–150. ISBN 978-1-910790-30-4.
  124. Stroppa, Andrea (2016). Social media and luxury goods counterfeit: a growing concern for government, industry and consumers worldwide. The Washington Post. Washington, D.C. pp. 1–50.
  125. "That Chanel bag on your Instagram feed may be fake". azcentral. Retrieved October 28, 2017.
  126. "New trends in online counterfeiting require updated enforcement policies - World Trademark Review". www.worldtrademarkreview.com. Retrieved October 28, 2017.
  127. How Anti-shoplifting Devices Work", HowStuffWorks.com
  128. Müller, Christian, Garriga, M. & Campoy-Quiles, M. (2012). "Patterned optical anisotropy in woven conjugated polymer systems". Applied Physics Letters. 101 (17): 171907. doi:10.1063/1.4764518.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

Further reading
  • Sara R. Ellis, Copyrighting Couture: An Examination of Fashion Design Protection and Why the DPPA and IDPPPA are a Step Towards the Solution to Counterfeit Chic, 78 Tenn. L. Rev. 163 (2010), available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1735745.
  • Phillips, Tim. Knockoff: The Deadly Trade in Counterfeit Goods Kogan Page, U.K. (2006)
  • Wilson, Bee. Swindled: The Dark History of Food Fraud, from Poisoned Candy to Counterfeit Coffee, Princeton University Press (2008)
  • Ellis, D.I., Brewster, V.L., Dunn, W.B., Allwood, J.W., Golovanov, A. and Goodacre, R. (2012) Fingerprinting food: current technologies for the detection of food adulteration and contamination. Chemical Society Reviews, 41, 5706–5727. doi:10.1039/c2cs35138b
  • Ellis, D.I., Muhamadali, H., Haughey, S.A., Elliott, C.T. and Goodacre, R. (2015) Point-and-shoot: rapid quantitative detection methods for on-site food fraud analysis – moving out of the laboratory and into the food supply chain. Analytical Methods. 7, 9401–9414. doi:10.1039/C5AY02048D http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2015/ay/c5ay02048d?page=search
  • Ellis, D.I.; Eccles, R.; Xu, Y.; Griffen, J.; Muhamadali, H.; Matousek, P.; Goodall, I.; Goodacre, R. (2017). "Through-container, extremely low concentration detection of multiple chemical markers of counterfeit alcohol using a handheld SORS device". Scientific Reports. 7 (1): 12082. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-12263-0. PMC 5608898. PMID 28935907.
  • Share and share alike: the challenges from social media for intellectual property rights. UK Government: Intellectual Property Office. 2017. 99. 1–150. ISBN 978-1-910790-30-4.
  • Stroppa, A., & Stefano, D. D. (2016). Social media and luxury goods counterfeit: a growing concern for government, industry and consumers worldwide (pp. 1–50, Rep.) (B. Parrella, Ed.). Washington, D.C.: The Washington Post.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.