Japan–South Korea trade dispute

The 2019–2020 Japan–South Korea trade dispute, sometimes also known as Japan–South Korea economic war on the Korean side,[2][3] is an ongoing economic conflict between Japan and South Korea, the world's third and eleventh largest national economies.

2019–2020 Japan–South Korea trade dispute
Part of Japan–South Korea relations and Japan–Korea disputes

"Boycott Japan" sticker on shop in Mokpo, South Korea
Date1 July 2019 - present (1 year, 1 month, 1 week and 5 days)
Location
Japan and South Korea
Status

Ongoing

  • Japan and South Korea remove each other from the trade "White-list".[1]
Parties involved in trade dispute

 South Korea

 Japan

Japan–South Korea trade dispute,
Japan–South Korea economic war (in South Korea),
Japanese economic retaliation (in South Korea)
Japanese name
Kanji日韓貿易紛争 or 日韓対立
Hiraganaにっかんぼうえきふんそう or
にっかんたいりつ
Korean name
Hangul
한일무역분쟁
한일경제전쟁
일본경제보복
Hanja

The conflict was fuelled by the legacy of World War II, and the ruling of the Supreme Court of South Korea which ruled in October and November 2018 that 10 forced labour victims were able to claim compensation from many Japanese companies.[4]

The cause of the conflict was officially cited by the Japanese government as the South Korean government allegedly not complying with export control security regulations and ignoring the Japanese government's request to have a bilateral trade dialogue for three years, but it was also characterized by a dispute over legacy of Japanese colonialism of the Korean Peninsula from 1910 to 1945, particularly the issue of "forced labour" and comfort women compensation.[5] The trade dispute has caused a significant deterioration in Japan–South Korea relations to the lowest point since the two countries normalized their diplomatic relations in 1965.[6][7]

Background
Main article: Japan–Korea disputes
Further information: Japan–South Korea relations, Economy of Japan, Economy of South Korea, and Korea under Japanese rule

Japan and South Korea are some of the world's largest economies, ranking 3rd and 11th, respectively, in terms of GDP. South Korea, the largest memory chip producer in the world, and Japan, the largest supplier of crucial materials in chip production, have so far served as the cradle for technological products such as smartphones and personal computers.

South Korea is home to Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix, companies that together produce two-thirds of the world's memory chips.[8] In Japan, 3 companies (JSR Corporation, Showa Denko, and Shin-Etsu Chemical) as well as Kanto Denka Kogyo, produce 90% of the world's Fluorinated polyimide and Photoresist, both of which are used for LCD and OLED displays, and 70% of Hydrogen Fluoride, used to make LSI, DRAM and NAND flash memory.[9][10] South Korea imports 94% of Fluorinated polyimide, 92% of Photoresists, and 44% of Hydrogen Fluoride from Japan, according to data from Korea International Trade Association.[11][note 1] On the other hand, Japan had export dependency on South Korea for these three materials at 22.5%, 11.6%, and 85.9%, respectively.[13]

The two countries established diplomatic relations in December 1965, following the signing of the normalization treaty in June of the same year when Japan recognized South Korea as the only legitimate government of the whole Korean Peninsula. As the relations continued to develop over the next few decades, both countries became two of the strongest allies of the United States in Asia, to counter the influence of China, Russia, and North Korea.[14] However, their relations have been negatively impacted by many ongoing disputes, such as the Liancourt Rocks dispute (known as Dokdo in Korean and Takeshima in Japanese) and differing interpretations on Imperial Japan's treatment of the people in then-colonial Korea.

MITI’s support for South Korea to become a member of global export control regime

South Korea began to establish its export control system in the 1980s, conflicting domestic and international pressures meant that it was not fully implemented.[15] In early 1990s, South Korea was still not a member of global export control regime. Japanese Ministry of International Trade and Industry (MITI) made approaches to other member countries and frequently visited South Korea to support their undertaking to implement export control system. As the result, South Korea could become a member of the multilateral export control regime in 1996, except for missiles, and they had been expressing appreciation to Japan for MITI’s efforts so far. It was in 2001 that South Korea could become a member about missiles after additional supporting efforts by Japanese MITI. Such relationship made METI, after Japanese 2001 Central Government Reform, to allow special treatment as a “white country” to give special preferential measures in 2004.[16][17]

In World Trade Organization (WTO), there is an agreement about "security exceptions" as Article 21.[18] It has been considered obvious that export control for security is the exception.[19]

Comfort women issue
Main article: Comfort women
A Imperial Japanese Army Special Volunteers by Korean people, which is used during World War II
Korean children holding "comfort bags" which were used during the Japanese colonial rule in 1930s or 1940s
A comfort women rally in front of the Japanese Embassy in Seoul demanding compensation from the Japanese government in August 2011

The issue over comfort women is one of many issues that shadow the further relationship between Japan and South Korea. During Japanese colonial rule in the Korean Peninsula, many of Koreans, both North and South, were forced to work at dozens of Japanese companies, often in brutal conditions.[20] In order to support its military ambitions, during World War II between 1939 and 1945, the Empire of Japan conscript 5.4 million Koreans, 670,000 of them were sent to mainland Japan as forced labour. They even forced to work on building ships and aircraft for Imperial Japan war efforts against the Allies.[21] Enlisted to the military "comfort stations" through force, the Korean comfort women, most of them under the age of 18, were forced to serve as sex slaves for 30–40 soldiers each day.[22]

Even after the two countries normalize their relations in 1965, the Japanese colonial legacy continues to haunt bilateral ties between the two countries. Many of South Koreans, mainly surviving comfort women, demanding more compensation and apology from the Japanese government, as well as individual claims for compensation.[23]

At the start of negotiations in 1951, the South Korean government initially demanded $364 million ($3.6 billion in 2019 dollars) in compensation for Koreans forced into labour and military service during the Japanese colonial rule: $200 ($1,973 in 2019 dollars) per survivor, $1,650 ($16,282 in 2019 dollars) per death and $2,000 ($19,735 in 2019 dollars) per injured person.[24] In the final agreement reached in the 1965 treaty, Japan provided an $800 million ($6.5 billion in 2019 dollars) aid as "economic cooperation", which include $300 million grant in economic aid and $200 million in loans together with $300 million in loans for private trust (equivalent to $2.4 billion, $1.6 billion, and $2,4 billion respectively in 2019 dollars), and low-interest loan package over 10 years. Japan intended to directly compensate individuals, but the South Korean government insisted on receiving the sum itself and "spent most of the money on economic development, focusing on infrastructure and the promotion of heavy industry".[25]

In 1995, Japan said that compensation for former comfort women was settled in the 1965 agreement, but Japan made Asian Women's Fund from the humanitarian standpoint. The fund was set up in 1994 and compensated not only Koreans but also former comfort women in all other countries (except Japanese).[26] This compensation was generally accepted outside of Korea, but in South Korea, many people refused to accept it, saying that it was not money contributed by the Japanese government.[27]

On 28 December 2015, after U.S. President Barack Obama pressured South Korean President Park Geun-hye and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzō Abe, the two countries signed an agreement regarding settling the issue of "comfort women" during World War II, which was deemed final and irreversible if Japan fulfils its responsibilities.[28][29] Japan agreed to pay ¥1 billion (₩9.7 billion; $8.3 million) to a fund supporting surviving victims while South Korea agreed to refrain from criticizing Japan regarding the issue and to work to remove a statue memorializing the victims from in front of the Japanese embassy in Seoul.[30] The announcement came after then Japanese foreign minister Fumio Kishida met his then counterpart Yun Byung-se in Seoul, and later Abe called Park to repeat the apologies already offered by Japan. But the agreement was protested by many people, especially the elderly comfort women survivors who thought the agreement was "humiliating" and could not trust the government.[31]

On 11 May 2017, newly-elected South Korean President Moon Jae-in announced the agreement would not be enacted in its current stage and that negotiations for a deal between Japan and South Korea over the comfort women dispute had to start over.[32] Meanwhile, in January 2018, Moon calls the 2015 agreement "undeniable, but calling Japan to accept the truth and make a heartfelt apology to victims.[33]

South Korean government, under Moon Jae-in's administration then discarded the 2015 agreement and shut down the Japan-funded comfort women foundation which was launched in July 2016 to finance the agreement's controversial settlement on 21 November 2018.[34] The decision sparked protest by Shinzō Abe's government, warned of risking damaging ties between the two countries.[35]

Court decisions regarding compensation

The two countries' bilateral relations then declined in late 2018, after Supreme Court of South Korea and other high courts made a decision that ordered several Japanese companies, including Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Nachi-Fujikoshi and Nippon Steel, to make compensations to the families of South Koreans who were unfairly treated and illegally forced to supply labour for World War II war efforts, such as building ships and aircraft for Japan without pay at a Mitsubishi shipyard and machine tool factory in Nagoya in 1944. These decisions infuriated the Japanese government, claiming that the issue was settled under the 1965 treaty of Normalization of Diplomatic relations between the two countries.

On 30 October 2018, the Supreme Court rejected appeals to overturn a 2013 order requiring Nippon Steel to pay compensation to four South Korean workers who underwent forced labour which occurred during the war and ordered to pay each of the workers an individual sum of 100 million won (US$87,700).[36] A month later, on 30 November 2018, Gwangju High Court rejected an appeal by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries regarding 2013 appeals of court decision that the company must pay 80 million won ($71,000) to compensate each of the 23 plaintiffs and ordered to compensate the remaining 5 South Korean elderly people who forced to work in a Japanese company where the company in a separated rulling by Supreme Court on 28 November ordered to pay 150 million won ($134,000) to each of 28 plaintiffs, elderly people which is still alive or their families.[37][38] On 18 January 2019, Seoul High Court dismissed Nachi-Fujikoshi appeal of October 2014 Seoul Central District Court decision against an order that it must pay each 17 South Korean women 80 million to 100 million won (US$69,000 to US$89,000)[39] because the victims were “tricked” into forced labour in harsh conditions.[40][41][42]

On 8 January 2019, Daegu District Court approved a request by paintiff to seizure of 81,075 shares held by Nippon Steel in POSCO-Nippon Steel RHF Joint Venture (PNR), a South Korea-based joint venture with POSCO, which is part of 2.34 million shares worth about 11 billion won ($9.78 million) owned by the Japanese steelmaker.[43] These decision was followed in March 2019 by same decision for seizure of Mitsubishi Heavy Industries trademark and patent assets by Daejeon District Court.[44]

On 19 June, South Korea proposed to join funds with Japan to give compensation to forced labour victims but Japan rejected the offer.[45] Instead, Japan called for the establishment of an arbitration panel in accordance with the rules of the 1965 Japan-Korea Normalization Agreement. The panel would consist of one member each from third-party countries.[45]

Chronology
From left to right: Kang Kyung-wha, Mike Pompeo, and Tarō Kōno in Bangkok, at a trilateral meeting in August 2019

July 2019
On July 1st, Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) applied updated licensing policies and procedures on the export and transfer of controlled items and their relevant technologies to South Korea.[46] These decisions, effective on July 4th, put updated licensing policies on the industry, including a licensing process, forcing exporters to seek approval for each shipment up to 90 days.[47] Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary Yasutoshi Nishimura has said that the curbs were due to security concerns.[48] The South Korean government has replied that the Japanese government is showing "economic retaliation" towards a matter that was decided by Supreme Court of South Korea, whose decisions cannot be altered by the Government of South Korea.[49]

In the press release regarding the export control and regulation, Japanese METI begins the process for removing South Korea from “White Countries”, and required exporters in Japan to have individual export licenses for certain items, fluorinated polyimide, resist, and hydrogen fluoride, and their relevant technologies.[46] As METI did not give specific examples,[50] some Japanese media doubted that South Korea may have passed on restricted chemicals to the United Arab Emirates, Iran, or North Korea.[51] For example, a Japanese broadcaster Fuji TV and a Japanese newspaper Sankei Shimbun on July 10th reported that over the past four years (from 2015 to March 2019), South Korea found 156 strategic goods with potential weapon being secretly exported.[52] The list included ingredients for the nerve agent VX, used in the assassination of Kim Jong-nam, the half-brother of North Korean leader Kim Jong-un, and hydrofluoric acid that had been smuggled to the United Arab Emirates and elsewhere.[53]

The South Korean government denied Japanese media's allegations. South Korean Trade, Industry and Energy Minister Sung Yun-mo stated that an emergency inspection on companies importing chemicals from Japan came up with no evidence those chemicals were being exported to North Korea, and that Japan's claims were groundless and should be stopped.[54] A Bareunmirae Party lawmaker Ha Tae-kyung made a further claims that Japanese authorities uncovered suspected smuggling of strategic items by Japanese companies to North Korea, citing data from the Center for Information on Security Trade Controls (CISTEC), a non-governmental organization that tracks data on export controls.[55] Others view Japan's trade restrictions as partially being an excuse to retaliate against suspected intellectual property infringement by South Korean companies.[56]

Then South Korea, on behalf of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy announced a plan to withdraw Japan's export restrictions during the meeting of the WTO Council on Trade in Goods in Geneva on July 8–9th.[57]

Samsung Electronics vice chairman Lee Jae-yong travelled to Japan on July 7th to seek support from Japanese suppliers.[58] He returned from Japan on the 12th and reportedly secured resources needed for its production for long term.[59][60]

On July 12th, representatives from Japan and South Korea held a meeting in Tokyo to discuss the worsening diplomatic relations between the two countries, but failed to resolve the issue.[61] A week later, as the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy of South Korea held a press conference on the administrative briefing held on July 12th and following exchanges of e-mails, and the press conference included some misinformation, METI disclosed the facts as press release.[62]

On July 24th, the two countries took the issue over high-tech exports to WTO in Geneva, where they sent senior officials. Japan sent the director-general of economic affairs of Foreign Ministry, Shingo Yamagami. South Korea also sent deputy trade minister Kim Seung-ho.[63][64] On the day, the minister of the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE) of South Korea (ROK) made claims about their catch-all control, the policy dialogue between Japan and South Korea, the South Korea's export control system, and possible global impact on free trade caused by Japan’s update. Responding to this, METI clarified Japan’s position on the South Korea’s catch-all system which South Korea claims as appropriate for both conventional weapons and weapons of mass destruction, and explained the background to the current lack of bilateral policy dialogue.[62]

August 2019
On August 2nd, Japanese cabinet approved the removal of South Korea from the "white-list".[65] The countries that have the most-favoured status as trade partners, consisted of 27 countries. The loss of “most-favoured trade status” will apply to dozens more products on a list of items that potentially could be converted to weapons.[66] The decision came after public comments from 40,000 people, which to more than 90% are in favour. The Trade Minister Hiroshige Sekō said that the trade measure was not intended to hurt bilateral ties of both countries.[67] Then, the government officially promulgates the revision bill that excluded the country from the list of preferential trade status and published in KANPO, Japan's official gazette on August 7th.[68][69] However, the bill did not stipulate any additional items that Japan will apply restrictions on, aside from the three chip and display materials.[70] Japanese government decision to downgrade and remove South Korea from white-list takes effect on August 28th, 2019, 21 days after promulgation. With the new revision, South Korea falls to Group B under revised Japanese export control system.[71][note 2] That means the Japanese manufacturers must apply for approval for each technology-related contract for 1,120 strategic materials that will exported to South Korea, rather than the simpler checks granted a preferential trade partners.[1]

South Korean foreign minister Kang Kyung-wha and her then Japanese counterpart Tarō Kōno clashed at the ASEAN Plus Three meeting in Bangkok, with Kang condemning the Japanese export control was "unilateral and arbitrary". But Kōno insist that the export control is fully compatible with WTO rules.[72][73]

On August 8th, the Japanese government, at a news conference held by Seko, approved shipments of a key material used in making chip and displays to South Korea in order to ease tensions between the two countries.[74] The approval was granted on August 7th, and according to South Korean Prime Minister Lee Nak-yeon, there was a material known as EUV photoresists, which is crucial for Samsung's advanced contact chipmaking production.[75] But Japan warned that if these three high-tech materials are found to be improperly used, the country will expand their strict checks of exports, including expanding application examination.[76] The same material were also approved by Japan on August 20th.[77]

On August 12th, South Korean government is taking measures to remove Japan from the country's own so-called "White-list", consisted of 29 preferred trade partners as retaliation of Japan's move, which was delayed on August 8th.[78][79] The decision takes effect on September 18th after the government complete its public opinion gathering process through government websites and emails from August 14th to September 3rd which 91% of the opinions were in favour of revision.[80][81][82] Upon the revision takes effect, Japan's status has changed. Japan falls into the newly established group A-2 under Korea's export control system. As a member of group A-2, Japan will be treated the same as countries in group B with some exceptions.[83][84]

On August 28th in Japan, partial amendment to the export trade control order was enforced.[65] There was an announcement by the government of South Korea on the day. In response to the announcement, METI provided their notes as press release to deny South Korean views.[85]

On August 29th, Japan approved the first export materials since South Korea's removal from the most-favoured trade status. There is a shipment of a Hydrogen fluoride, whose the materials exported for the first time since Japan tightened its exports. The main recipient of the material is Samsung Electronics.[86] But Japan refused to confirm the export.[87]

September 2019
On September 3rd, METI submitted opinions and questions regarding the plans of South Korea to revise the public notice of the exportation and importation of strategic items.[88]

South Korean Trade, Industry, and Energy Ministry announce to file a complaint with the WTO over Japanese tighter export controls and restrictions of three materials. The trade minister Yoo Myung-hee, told media on September 11th that she described the restrictions as a “discriminatory act directly targeting South Korea, and it was politically motivated”.[89][90] Japanese Trade Minister Isshu Sugawara agree to hold talks with South Korea under WTO dispute settlement in a press conference on September 20th.[91][92]

On September 26th, newly-appointed Japanese Foreign Minister Toshimitsu Motegi meet with South Korean Foreign Minister Kang Kyung-wha in New York City. The two countries fail to make a progress to resolve the bilateral issue, says that are "big disagreements" between the two countries, but agree to continue the dialogue.[93][94]

October 2019
South Korean Trade, Industry, and Energy Ministry issued a statement on October 1st that the Japanese government has not approved shipment of Hydrogen fluoride to the country even though 90 days have passed since a Japanese exporter submitted an application to export the materials.[95]

On October 11th, Japan held consultations under the WTO Agreement in Geneva with the government of South Korea regarding Japan’s update of licensing policies and procedures on exports to South Korea.[96][97] This is part of the WTO Dispute Settlement procedure under which South Korea requested bilateral talks. If it does not resolve the issue on 60 days, South Korea will request the WTO Dispute Settlement Body to establish a panel to rule on the issue.[89]

November 2019
The second round of bilateral consultation under the WTO Agreement was held on November 19th. Japan pointed out that the allegation of WTO-inconsistency is completely baseless. And, Japan explained once again that export licenses are granted once items in concern are confirmed to be for civil use and no risk of diversion for military use exists, that Japan's measure is not an export ban, and no impact to supply chains has been found.[98] These talks fail to resolve the trade dispute between two countries.[99]

December 2019
On December 4th, Japanese METI held a Director-General level preparatory meeting for the 7th Japan-Korea Export Control Policy Dialogue with the Korean Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE). During the preparatory meeting, both sides discussed details of the forthcoming policy dialogue including dates and agendas.[100]

On December 16th, Japanese METI held the 7th Japan-Korea Export Control Policy Dialogue with Korean MOTIE. During the Dialogue, experts from the two sides exchanged views on circumstances and challenges regarding critical technology control and their export control systems. Both sides agreed to continue the Dialogue and communications in order to contribute to resolving issues of concern.[101]

February 2020
On February 21st, Japanese METI held a Director-General level preparatory meeting with Korean MOTIE. As a result of the meeting, both sides agreed to hold the 8th Japan-Korea Export Control Policy Dialogue on March 10th.[102]

March 2020
On March 6th, Japanese METI and Korean MOTIE have agreed to hold the 8th Japan-Korea Export Control Policy Dialogue on March 10th via video conference system.[103] On March 10th, Japanese METI and Korean MOTIE held the 8th Japan-Korea Export Control Dialogue. At the Dialogue, both sides updated and exchanged views on improvements in system and implementation of trade and sensitive technology transfers controls, in order to contribute to exploring resolution of issues of concern.[104]

June 2020
On June 19th, responding to the resumption of WTO dispute settlement process which was announced by South Korea, Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry Hiroshi Kajiyama mentioned that such a unilateral action is deeply regrettable as it would undermine agreements at the previous Japan-Korea Export Control Policy Dialogues where both sides agreed to explore resolution of issues of concern through dialogues and communications.[105] On June 30th, after blocking South Korea’s initial request for the establishment of WTO panel, Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry Kajiyama mentioned that he wants to urge South Korea to come back to the table and suspend the WTO process so that we can relaunch the Export Control Policy Dialogues.[106]

Reactions

South Korea

Government

The South Korean government's stance on the dispute is that Japan's export control is groundless and unfair. It argues that it has a sufficient catch-all control system and the lack of communication was on Japan's end. They further stated that Japan's export control is in violation of international law and will be both disruptive and harmful to both countries economies and the global market. The South Korean government urged Japan to withdraw its export control as they claim would damage their relationship further.[107][108]

Before whitelist removal

The South Korean government, led by the First Vice Foreign Minister Cho Sei-Young, summoned the Japanese ambassador to lodged the protest against the export curbs by Japan on 1 July. The Trade, Industry and Energy Minister Sung Yun-Mo called Japan's move "deeply regrettable".[109][110]

Then, on 10 July, President Moon Jae-in in a meeting with executives from the country's 30 conglomerates, urged Japan to “return to the principle of free trade that Japan has been pushing for” and said he would “take responsive measures” if South Korean companies were harmed by the new restrictions aimed by Japanese government.[111]

After whitelist removal

In response to Japan's removal of the country from the list, the government held emergency cabinet meeting on the same day as Japan's announcement (2 August) and broadcast live on television across the country. Moon warned Japan against the decisions. He warned that the country will “resolutely take corresponding measures”.[112] He also said that country 'won't be defeated again' by Japan.[113]

The government announced to tighten its import quota on fishery and agricultural products from Fukushima, which was introduced due to concerns of radioactive contamination.[114]

On 15 August, 74th anniversary of Korea's liberation from Japanese rule, President Moon delivered a speech, urged Japan to return to dialogue to ease the tensions. Moon also saying South Korea has "not dwelt on the past" and expressed hope that Japan will play a leading role together in facilitating peace and prosperity in East Asia.[115]

In order to reduce its reliance on Japanese Industries, the government announced a comprehensive research and development strategy. This includes a plan to spend 7.8 trillion won ($6.48 billion) in research and development for local materials, parts, and equipment over the next seven years.[116] The government also pledged to spend 5 trillion won ($4.12 billion) to increase its own capabilities in the development of key industrial materials. The massive R&D investment will take place starting in 2020 until 2022.[117]

South Korea propose a record budget about 513.5 trillion won ($423.7 billion) for 2020 to boost its slowing economy, represents a 9.3 percent hike from 2019 budget. A key centrepiece of the spending proposals is 24.1 trillion won ($19.9 billion) set aside for research and development (R&D) in 2020, which is up 17.3 percent from 2019, the highest in a decade.[118]

Regional governments

In response to Japanese trade restrictions to South Korea, regional governments across the country launched a boycott of Japanese products and exchange programmes. The action includes the suspension of various activities such as public procurement and leasing of Japanese products, official business trips to Japan and “sisterhood” relationships with Japanese cities.[119]

Two regional legislative bodies, Seoul Metropolitan Council and Busan Metropolitan Council on 6 September, passed non-binding ordinance labelling 284 Japanese companies including Mitsubishi Heavy Industries as "war criminal companies" to denounce the alleged use of forced labour by these companies. Under the ordinances, these Japanese companies are to be given the designation, with the mayors and other officials of the cities being requested not to purchase products from the companies in the future.[120][121] In the case of Busan, there is also a provision that stickers saying "product of a war crime company" be attached to products that have already been purchased.[122]

Political parties

The Liberty Korea Party, while calling on Japan to remove the export restriction, have also criticized President Moon's handling of the issue. Rep. Na Kyung-won claimed that Moon's administration have exacerbated the issue and have also damaged relationship with the US to the point where US will not intervene.[123][124] The LKP called for the government to focus on finding a diplomatic solution with Japan rather than a take hard-line stance.[125]

All political parties in South Korea have voiced the need to restrict Japanese imports. So far, they have announced plans to create a "Pan-national" emergency body in response to the situation.[126] South Korea's major political parties have agreed to establish a bipartisan body on 31 July 2019.[127]

Others
Anti-Japanese banner in Mokpo
See also: 2019 boycott of Japanese products in South Korea

South Koreans are very unhappy with the Japanese government's decision to removing the country from the whitelist. They fear that the restriction will hurt the South Korean economy and blame the Prime Minister Shinzō Abe.[128] Many South Koreans also feel that these restrictions are unjust and unfair, because of what Japan did during colonization of the Korean Peninsula from 1910 until the end of World War II in 1945.

In response to Japan's move, on 5 July, a group of a South Koreans took to the street to announce a boycott of Japanese products.[129] Since then, many South Koreans decided to boycott all Japanese products and imports, including food and beverages, cosmetics, vehicles, and clothes. Some also cancelled scheduled trips to Japan.[130][131]

On Blue House presidential petition website in July 2019, nearly 27,000 people signed a petition calling for a boycott of Japanese products and an end to tourism to Japan. According to the petition website, if 200,000 people sign the petition within a month, the government is obligated to respond to the matter officially.[132]

A website called NoNoJapan.com, created by Kim Byung-kyu was launched on 11 July to provide information about Japanese products and services that Koreans boycotted and alternative Korean products to these Japanese one.[133] As more Koreans join the boycott, the website experienced a server crash due to a spike in traffic.[133]

About 5,000 people, including members of 596 civil groups, held a candlelight vigil on 27 July, in Gwanghwamun Plaza and in front of the Japanese embassy to criticize Prime Minister Shinzo Abe for imposing trade restrictions.[134] They also held another candlelight vigil in front of the Japanese Embassy in Seoul, on 3 August, with more than 15,000 people according to organizer, participating in the rally.[135] A similar protest was held on 10 August, now with a declaration was signed by 1,000 students. The protesters also demand South Korea's removal from GSOMIA, which is a military information-sharing pact with Japan. The number of participants was similar to second rally.[136][137]

They also held large scale candlelight vigil rally at Gwanghwamun Plaza, Chosun Ilbo headquarters, and the Japanese Embassy on 15 August, which is the 74th anniversary of the liberation of Korea from Japanese colonial rule. They estimate that 30,000 to 100,000 people participate in the rally.[138] In contrast, conservative groups also held simultaneous rally, called for pushback of anti-Japanese sentiment.[139][140]

There are two people that set himself in fire to protest Japanese government decision, which held in front of the Japanese Embassy In Seoul. The first incidents was occurred on 19 July, at 3:24 am local time, which a men died after the incident,[141] and second incident occurred on 1 August by a 72-year-old man, which is in critical condition.[142][143]

The boycott of Japanese products spread into the cultural sector, with release of latest Doraemon film series Doraemon: Nobita's Chronicle of the Moon Exploration, which is originally scheduled on 14 August, had been postponed indefinitely even after the film's Korean dubbing was finished. In July, another Japanese animation films, Butt Detective the Movie and Detective Conan: The Fist of Blue Sapphire, was subjected to unfavourable online reviews on internet and sold only 134,000 and 200,000 tickets respectively.[144][145]

A poll conducted by Realmeter involving 504 adults reveal that, as of 24 July, 62.8% of respondents say they are boycotting Japanese goods.[146][147] Another poll conducted by Gallup Korea involving 1,005 adults found that only 12% held favourable views on Japan, while 77% have negative views. Likewise the poll found that 61% of respondents blame the Japanese government for the conflict, while 17% hold the South Korean government responsible.[148]

There were calls by many South Korean lawmakers to restraint or stopping their Investment in Japanese companies involved in their war crime against the many Korean slave labour. Korea Investing Corporation and National Pension Service faced pressure to do so.[149][150] The pension fund then started to reviewing 1.23 trillion won ($1.1 billion) worth of investment of Japanese companies whether the companies, as many as 75 companies should be dropped if proved to companies that linked to Japanese war efforts in World War II.[151]

Some South Korean media have expressed concerns about the trade dispute; such as the large dependency on Japanese materials, the dispute prolonging, doubts about US intervention, and the government having few options to tackle the dispute.[152][153][154][155] The Korea Times editorial have criticized the Blue House's response to the issue.[156]

Japan

Government

The Japanese government's stance is based on global export control regime,[157] and its is a case of updating implementation due to significantly undermined trust with South Korea.[46][158]

They argue that, while South Korea's catch-all control covers WMD-related goods, it has never clarified whether it covers conventional weapons as well. The Japanese government also claimed that South Korea has repeatedly postponed policy dialogues between the two nations. Japan also maintains that South Korea will simply be treated as a normal trade partner in same other Asian countries and will not get incentive measures as a "white country", the change does not break international law and that it is not an embargo.[62][159]

In response to South Korea's move to remove Japan from the list of most favoured trade partners, the Trade Minister Hiroshige Seko said on Twitter on August 13th that South Korea failed to show how Japan had purportedly fallen short of international export control measures.[160] He also said Japan does not understand why it has been removed from neighbouring country's list of trusted trade partners.[161]

Others

Soon after the METI's press release, a professor who had been in charge of export control at MITI started to provide corrections and commentaries on this issue in media, as there had been many misunderstandings in media provided by non-expert editors and commentators.[16][162][163][19]

The Japanese government's decision to update implementation of export export control prompted criticism from many people, a group of 75 people including writer Satoshi Kamata, economic analyst Katsuto Uchihashi and Akira Kawasaki, signed an online petition that called both countries to hold a dialogue to resolve the conflict.[164]

According to a survey conducted by Asahi Shimbun on July 15, 56 percent of respondents support the government's export control while 21 percent did not. Among those who support Prime Minister Shinzō Abe, 74 percent of respondents support it. Among those who disapprove of Shinzō Abe, 43% say they support the export control while 36% say they're against it.[165]

Despite the majority of Japanese supporting the government's actions, on August 4 there was a group of 200 Japanese and Korean demonstrators who protested Abe's government in the streets of Shinjuku. They called Abe to stop the export curbs to South Korea.[166] The amount of protesters increased on August 8. There were calls by the protestors for Abe to resign as the Prime Minister.[167][168] The organizer of the protests enlisted new participants through many social media platforms.[168]

In the midst of the trade dispute between the two countries, Japanese author Hirokazu Kore-eda urged Japanese and Korean artists to show support for one another to overcome their countries' political situation.[169]

Other countries and viewpoints

Many countries showed concern to the actions of the two countries hurting the global tech industry. Tech companies in the United States issued a letter to both countries urging the two nations to negotiate a resolution to the dispute.[170]

Five of America's largest tech industry groups including the Semiconductor Industry Association, which Qualcomm and Intel Corporation as a members, among its other companies, issued a joint letter to Japanese Economy Minister Hiroshige Sekō and South Korean Minister of Trade Yoo Myung-hee. They asked both sides to refrain from escalating their conflict.[171]

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi urged Japan and South Korea to show goodwill and resolve their trade spat through negotiations and dialogue.[172]

U.S. President Donald Trump voiced concern about the worsening ties between Japan and South Korea. He said on 9 August that trade and history dispute put the country (United States) in a "very difficult position". He urged the two countries to "get along".[173]

Some observers have pointed out that the dispute may have been exacerbated by both of the countries' leaders to drum up political support. During the beginning of the trade dispute Prime Minister Shinzō Abe's ruling Liberal Democratic Party were gearing up for Upper House election on 21 July. At the same time, President Moon Jae-in faced criticism for his economic policy and lack of progress in relationship with North Korea. Observers noted that both leaders are unlikely to back down from the dispute due to political pressure.[174][175][176][156][177]

Many analysts and experts have viewpoints about the trade dispute as well. Political analyst Paul Triolo, who also practice head of geo-technology at Eurasia Group, told CNBC that since Japan and South Korea are U.S. allies, the United States will likely to involved in mediating the two countries in addition to China because from U.S. perspective, this is a "lose-lose confrontation", which could also inadvertently benefit China. On the other hand, Waqas Adenwala, Asia analyst at the Economist Intelligence Unit said it may be “awkward” for China to mediate in this dispute, as both South Korea and China were victims of Japan's invasion and brutal killings during World War II.[178]

Other analyst and experts, such as Kim Hyun-Chul, an expert on Japanese enterprise at Seoul National University, told ABC News unlike trade of finished goods, high-tech industry goods that are sourced globally are interdependent. Countries that rely on South Korea's semiconductors such as the United States, China and even Japan will all be adversely affected, causing a domino effect on the global supply chain in computer and smartphone industries. Meanwhile, Rajiv Biswas, Asia-Pacific chief economist at IHS Markit, said U.S. electronics companies, many of which have large production hubs in both the U.S. and China, are vulnerable to supply shortages of South Korean memory chips, given the importance of South Korea as a supplier of chips not only hardware such as mobile phones and electronic products but also data processing programs.[179]

Business leaders

On the annual conference of the Korea-Japan Economic Association in Seoul, 300 business leaders from the two countries have urged both governments to find a diplomatic solution for the trade disputes.[180]

International organization
The WTO headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland, where South Korea filed a complaint

On July 14, 2019, at the request of South Korea, the World Trade Organization (WTO) agreed to formally discuss at its General Council meeting about Japan's semiconductors export curbs to South Korea.[181] On July 24, South Korea's delegation brought the dispute to the General Council meeting, and Japanese delegation told that the South Korea's complaints are not acceptable,[182] and other WTO members preferred not to get involved in the dispute.[183]

Efforts to resolve the dispute

China-Japan-South Korea meeting in Beijing

On 21 August, the two countries involved in the trade war, and China, involved in a different trade war with the United States, held a trilateral meeting in Beijing. In that meeting, Japan and South Korea agreed to discuss efforts to resolve the conflict over compensating Korean forced labourers that has escalated into a trade war. The then Foreign Minister, now Minister of Defense, Tarō Kōno said that the two countries shared the view on the need to resolve the dispute.[184] But South Korea's Foreign Minister said that South Korea hopes that the country will stick to "free and fair" trade for prosperity in the region.[185]

Prime Ministers and Presidents meeting

Aside from bilateral negotiations in WTO, the two countries hold a bilateral talks to resolve the problem. The first was on 24 October, when the Prime Minister Lee Nak-yeon met with his counterpart Shinzō Abe in Tokyo.[186] The second was on 4 November in ASEAN summit in Bangkok where Moon Jae-in held a 11-minute conversation with the Japanese Prime Minister.[187] Photos of the meeting were taken by Chung Eui-yong, director of the South Korean National Security office, and published without the approval of the Japanese side.[188]

Effects

Financial markets

The Japanese government decision to revoke preferred trade partner status for South Korea rattle global stock markets, aside from Trump tweet about tariffs on Chinese products, especially in Japan and South Korea.

On 2 August, days which occur the removal of South Korea from the list, Nikkei 225, Japanese main stock indices, fell 2.11% and South Korea's KOSPI down 0.95%, a 7-month low.[189] Two index then down sharply on 5 August, with Nikkei 225 down 1.74% to 20,720 and Kospi down 2.56% to close at lowest level since 2016 at 1,946.98. KOSDAQ, which consisted tech-heavy and small and middle-cap stocks, plunged more than 7 percent to trigger trading halt. For the first time this occurred since 24 June 2016.[190]

In the currency markets, South Korean won fell 9.50 won against US Dollar to closed at 1,198.00, lowest level since 9 January 2017.[191] Then the currency plunged to more than 3-year low against the Dollar at 1,215.35 won on 5 August, lowest level since 24 June 2016 and sharpest daily loss since August 2016.[192][193]

Meanwhile, many global financial markets plunge amid the decision and many stock markets take the selloff, with Nasdaq fell 1.32%, Dow Jones fell 0.37%, and S&P 500 down 0.73%. Also in other stock markets, for example, FTSE 100, DAX, and CAC 40 plunged 2.34%, 3.11%, and 3.57% respectively. On 5 August, the index took the one of largest daily loss in 2019, with Dow Jones down 767 points (2.98%), S&P 500 down nearly 3% and Nasdaq down 3.5%. Dow Jones in particular, down as much as 961.63 points.

Economy

The trade dispute (along with the China–United States trade war) is predicted to have a negative impact on both Japan and South Korea's economy. Japan's growth percentage was lowered for the second quarter of 2019 and the trade dispute with South Korea is expected to exacerbate the slowdown.[194] Several financial services companies have lowered their forecast on South Korea's 2019 economic growth to around two percent or lower.[195][196][197] The Bank of Korea has lowered South Korea's economic growth from 2.5% to 2.2%. In response to the economic forecast, they have also lowered interest rate from 1.75% to 1.5% on 18 July 2019.[198] It further cut its rates to 1.25% on 15 October.[199]

Moody's Investors Service, in a “Global Macro Outlook 2019-20” report released on 26 August, revised down forecast economic growth for both South Korea and Japan. For South Korea, the global ratings agency lowered economic growth forecast from 2.1% to 2.0% in 2019 and 2.1% in 2020 to reflect the fallout from trade dispute with Japan. the agency said the trade dispute “undermines Korea’s near-term growth prospects”.[200] For Japan, the agency revised down economic growth forecast to 0.7% in 2019 and 0.4% in 2020. Moody's cites that Korea's boycott movement against Japanese goods and services may dent sales. But it saw trade in intermediate goods – including those covered by the export curbs and also more correlated to the global economic downturn – as “posing a larger threat to the Japanese economy.”[201]

Amid the trade dispute with Japan, South Korean consumer sentiment fall to 31-month low in August. According to data from Bank of Korea, the composite consumer sentiment index down 3.4 points to 92.5 from 95.9 in July.[202] It is the lowest level since January 2017, a month after then-president Park Geun-hye was impeached.[203] The July consumer sentiment index also down to 95.9, 1.6 points lower than in June, where it stood at 97.5.[204]

The World Trade Organization (WTO) in October 2019, cuts the forecast of volume of merchandise trade growth to 1.2% in 2019 and 2.7% in 2020, down from previous forecasted of 2.6% and 3% respectively. WTO cites this trade dispute, along with the China–U.S trade war, Brexit, and others, pose "the biggest downside risk to the forecast".[205]

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) downgraded the economic forecast for many Asian economies because deterioration of relationship between South Korea and Japan. Asian economy could grow 5% in 2019 and 5.1% in 2020. South Korean economic growth could fall to 2% in 2019 and 2.2% in 2020.[206]

Boycott on Japan
Main article: 2019 boycott of Japanese products in South Korea
Logo of "NO, BOYCOTT JAPAN", indicate South Koreans boycott of Japanese goods and services, where red circle, representing Flag of Japan, commonly known as Hinomaru. The sentence translates to "Don't go, Don't buy!"

Boycotts of Japanese products and services in South Korea have affected Japanese brands and tourism to Japan.

Japanese brands
A Uniqlo store in South Korea, 2015. Uniqlo is one of many Japanese brands affected by the South Korean boycott.

On 29 July 2019, a Korean credit card company reported that credit card sales from Muji fell by 33.4%, ABC Mart sales fell by 11.4% and DHC Corporation fell by 55.3%.[207] Similarly, credit card spending from South Koreans in Japan have also declined.

One of companies hardest-hit by boycott was Fast Retailing, companies that own Uniqlo. Uniqlo sales dropped by 40% and the company announced it close its Jongno 3-ga store in central Seoul.[208] Analyst such as Peter Boardman warns that despite Fast Retailing post record profits, but the company could see many uncertainty because sales in South Korea account for 8% of Uniqlo sales worldwide.[209]

Many Japanese automakers suffering steep fall in July and August. On 4 September, according to data from Korea Automobile Importers & Distributors Association (KAIDA), the combined sales of Japanese cars stood at 1,398 units in August, more than halving from a year earlier. By brand, Toyota saw its August sales plunging 59.1 percent on-year to 542 units, while Honda suffered an 80.9 percent on-year sales drop to 138 units and Nissan's car sales down 87.4 percent on-year to 57 units.[210] The Japanese-brand automakers also suffering slump in July, with Toyota sales down 32% from the year earlier and Honda car sales tumbled 33.5% year-on-year. Lexus, South Korea's third-most imported car brand after Mercedes-Benz and BMW, saw sales down 24.6% from the previous month, although that was still up 33% from the previous year, according to data from KAIDA on 5 August.[211][212]

Preliminary data from Korea Customs Service in September said imports of Japanese beer for the month of August 2019 stood at US$223,000, down 97% from $7.57 million a year earlier.[213][214]

Tourism
South Korean tourists to Japan

The number of South Korean tourists visiting Japan fell 48% in August to 308,700, the lowest number since May 2016, according to Japan National Tourism Organization (JNTO). However a total number of inbound visitors decreased slightly by 2.2% to 2,520,100 because visitors from other countries increased significantly.[215] Moreover, a surplus in the travel balance was an August record because the average spending increased as a result of the decrease of Korean visitors whose average spending per visitor is less than a half of other countries.[216][217][218] On 16 October, JNTO reported that the number of South Korean tourists visiting Japan fell 58% in September to 201,200. However a total number of inbound visitors increased 5.2% to 2,272,900.[215] The total spending of inbound visitors from July to September increased 9.0% despite the decrease of Korean visitors.[219]

Some South Korean airlines announced they will reduce flights or suspend direct routes between major Japanese and South Korean cities.[220] For example, Korean Air, the South Korea's largest airline, suspended its Busan-Osaka route from 16 September, and routes between Jeju and Narita and between Jeju and Osaka-Kansai from 1 November. The airline also temporarily suspended some of its other routes: Incheon-Komatsu and Incheon-Kagoshima both were suspended from 29 September to 16 November, and Incheon-Asahikawa suspended from 26 September to 26 October.[221] Air Seoul, an Asiana Airlines subsidiary, suspended flights from Incheon to Toyama on 16 September and from Incheon to Kumamoto and Ube from 27 October.[222]

As the number of passengers travelling between the two countries is plummeting, Airfares from Japan to South Korea and elsewhere in many airlines dropped to less than $10. CNN reported that it costs as little as 10,000 won ($8.38) to fly one-way from Seoul to Fukuoka on Eastar Jet, and only 1,000 Japanese yen ($9.35) the other way.[223] If it include tax and fuel surcharges, the same route costs 7,590 yen ($71).[224]

GSOMIA termination intention and renewal announcement

As retaliation against Japan's decision to restrict export of high-tech materials and remove of South Korea from its export “white list,” South Korea decided on the termination of the General Security of Military Information Agreement (GSOMIA). The General Security of Military Information Agreement (GSOMIA) is an agreement signed in November 2016 by South Korea and Japan to share sensitive information about threats from North Korea.[225] According to Article 21 of the agreement, the GSOMIA will automatically be renewed for a year unless one of two countries announce a termination notice 90 days prior to the extension of the agreement.

Deputy of Blue House national security office, Kim You-geun, announced on 22 August that South Korea decided to give Japan the required 90 day notice to terminate the military intelligence sharing pact.[226][227] According to South Korea, Japan did not meet Seoul's “national interests” to maintain the deal. They also stated that Tokyo has failed to communicate a clear explanation for placing controls on certain exports to South Korea.[228] The decisions were announced after hours-long debate in National Security Command (NSC).[229] On the other hand, South Korean Foreign Ministry added that the decision to terminate the military-sharing pact was due to trust issue between the two countries.[230] GSOMIA initially set to expire on 23 November 2019 but South Korea decide to reverse decision to continue the agreement on 22 November.[231]

Concerns and controversies

Anti-Japanese banner in Jung-gu

On 6 August 2019, a 1,000 anti-Japan banners starting to put up at centre of Seoul, as local workers hanging the banners from the streets of Jung-gu. Days before, on 5 August the district office, which headed by Seo Yang-ho, announced the plan to set the banner ahead of National Liberation day on 15 August. But the banner was sparked widespread anger by South Koreans who felt uncomfortable with the banners, as there was a widespread consensus that the anti-Japan movement is to be done by the civilians, not by the government authorities as this action might harm the motivation of anti-Japan movements and undermine the negotiation capability of the government. Then, the district head apologized for the situations and reversed his decision.[232] A Cheong Wa Dae online petition website requesting to bring down the “No Japan” banners, had collected more than 20,000 signatures.[233]

Pro-Japanese praising video

On 7 August, Chairman of Kolmar Korea Yoon Dong-han played a video by far-right Youtuber named Leeseob TV praising Shinzo Abe and criticizing the Moon Jae-In administration. The video included vulgar language and comments such as “Abe is definitely a great leader and President Moon Jae-in should be thankful for not getting punched by Abe in the face”. This video sparked criticism against the chairman and prompt the company to issue the official statement regarding the video on 9 August.[234] But the online communities still anger and started to boycott the company's products. The backlash prompt the chairman to issue public apology on 11 August and the chairman was resign after he apologized to 700 employees of the company.[235] Shares of Kolmar Korea fell 6.2% after the official statement from the company.[236]

DHC TV anti-Korean broadcast

Starting on 10 August DHC Television, a subsidiary of the Japanese cosmetic manufacturer DHC Corporation, made inflammatory comments about Korea and its history. This sparked anger among South Koreans and prompted DHC Korea to issue an apology on 13 August. Korean consumers were urged to stop purchasing DHC's products.[237]

gollark: What would it *do*?
gollark: There is actually a feature where it can accept commands over LAN networks, which is designed for the Potatodatacentre but does work everywhere.
gollark: Spreading to disks, anyway.
gollark: It used to have that but the admins insisted I turn it off.
gollark: I'm always looking for ideas for the potato operational system.

See also

Notes
  1. According to data from January to May 2019, South Korea imports 93.7% of Fluorinated polyimide, 91.9% of Photoresist and 43.9% of Hydrogen Fluoride from Japan. There was a significant decline in Hydrogen fluoride imports since 2010, at which point South Korea imported 72.2% from Japan. Despite Fluorinated polyimide and Photoresist also having a noticeable decline since 2010 at 97.7% and 95.5%, respectively, the dependency on Japanese industries for these materials are still high,[12] making South Korea still vulnerable to export restrictions from Japan.
  2. From August 2019, the Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry renamed the “Preferred Trade Partner List Countries" or ”Whitelist Countries" to Group A and non-whitelist countries divided into Group B, C, snd D and re-categorized these countries to reflect their actual statuses against the Japanese export control system. Newly-renamed Group A includes 21 European Union member states, Australia and New Zealand, as well as Argentina, Canada and the United States.

References
  1. "Japan's move to lower South Korea trade status takes effect". ABC News. August 28, 2019.
  2. '일본 도대체 왜?' 지속되는 한일 경제 전쟁… 그 해법은?. Kyunghyang Shinmun (in Korean). August 9, 2019.
  3. "South Korea accuses Japan of waging 'economic war'". CNN. August 9, 2019.
  4. "There's another major trade war that's starting to heat up while everyone is focused on the US and China". Business Insider. September 14, 2019. Retrieved September 26, 2019.
  5. "Trade War Between Japan And South Korea". The Organization of World Peace. July 18, 2019. Archived from the original on August 27, 2019. Retrieved August 27, 2019.
  6. Tachikawa, Tomoyuki (August 15, 2019). "Japan-S. Korea rift may change regional economic, security structures". Kyodo News. Retrieved September 3, 2019.
  7. "Japan-South Korea Tensions Escalate into Tit-for-Tat Trade Conflict". Jiji Press. August 14, 2019. Retrieved September 3, 2019.
  8. Pham, Sherisse (July 26, 2019). "The Japan-South Korea trade spat is getting worse. That's bad news for the tech industry". CNN. Retrieved July 26, 2019.
  9. "Japan-South Korea dispute impact on semiconductor supply". CNBC. Retrieved July 26, 2019.
  10. "Supply of DRAM, NAND, and displays could-be disrupted by Japan and South Korea dispute". Anandtech. Retrieved August 4, 2019.
  11. "Semiconductor Raw Material Import Critical For South Korean Industry". WCCftech. Retrieved July 4, 2019.
  12. 일본이 보복하는 반도체 소재의 대일수입 의존도는 얼마나 되나리지스트.에칭가스.플루오린폴리이미드 각각 91.9%, 43.9%, 93.7%. Korea International Trade Association (in Korean). July 4, 2019. Retrieved September 1, 2019.
  13. "Japan strengthening export controls against South Korea, may leave China as sole winner in 5G competition". Grici.or.jp. Retrieved August 23, 2019.
  14. "Japan and South Korea Can't Get Along". Foreign Affairs. July 31, 2019. Retrieved August 9, 2019.
  15. Lee, Jaewon (November 2013). "South Korea's Export Control System" (PDF). SIPRI Background Paper. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. Retrieved July 15, 2020.
  16. Hosokawa, Masahiko (July 3, 2019). "誤解だらけの「韓国に対する輸出規制発動」" [So many misunderstandings about the implementation of export control]. Nikkei Business. Nikei BP. Retrieved July 12, 2020.
  17. "国際経済への影響小さい　指定当時の経産省幹部・細川昌彦氏" [The effect for international economy will be small: Masahiko Hosokawa, the person who had been in charge of designating South Korea into the white list told]. Tokyo Shinbun (in Japanese). July 27, 2019. Retrieved August 12, 2020.
  18. "Article XXI: Security Exceptions" (PDF). WTO. Retrieved July 19, 2020.
  19. Hosokawa, Masahiko (July 23, 2019). "補足解説3：誤解だらけの「韓国に対する輸出規制発動」" [Appendix 3: So many misunderstandings about the implementation of export control]. Nikkei Business. Nikei BP. Retrieved July 19, 2020.
  20. "Why Japan and South Korea Have Their Own Trade War". Bloomberg. July 1, 2019. Retrieved August 28, 2019.
  21. "Korean-Japanese history in modern times". Bloomberg. August 22, 2010. Retrieved September 27, 2019.
  22. The World Conference on Japanese Military Sexual Slavery Archived 20 November 2008 at the Wayback Machine
  23. "A trade war over history? Sort of. Why Japan and South Korea are feuding". The Christian Science Monitor. August 9, 2019. Retrieved August 28, 2019.
  24. Seoul Demanded $364 Million for Japan's Victims Updated," Chosun Ilbo 17 January 2005 (archived from the original Archived 9 February 2006 at Archive.today on 9 February 2006)
  25. "Korea-Japan ties burdened by baggage". Asia Times. Retrieved September 3, 2019.
  26. BBC News Japan's divisive 'comfort women' fund 10 April 2007 Retrieved on 16 September 2019
  27. "The Comfort Women, the Asian Women's Fund and the Digital Museum". The Asia Pacific Journal. February 1, 2008. Retrieved September 16, 2019.
  28. "Japan and South Korea agree WW2 'comfort women' deal". BBC News. December 28, 2015. Retrieved August 9, 2019.
  29. "South Korea, Japan agree to 'irreversibly' resolve WWII 'comfort women' issue in landmark agreement". ABC News (Australia). December 28, 2015. Retrieved August 25, 2019.
  30. Adelstein, Jake; Kubo, Angela (December 28, 2015). "South Korea and Japan 'finally and irreversibly' reconcile on World War II sex slaves". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on December 28, 2015. Retrieved August 25, 2019.
  31. "South Korea 'comfort women' reject deal with Japan". Deutsche Welle. December 30, 2015. Retrieved September 3, 2019.
  32. James Griffiths (May 11, 2017). "South Korea's new president questions Japan 'comfort women' deal". CNN. Archived from the original on May 11, 2017.
  33. "South Korea leader Moon calls 2015 'comfort women' deal 'undeniable,' but says Japan must still offer apology". The Japan Times. January 10, 2018. Retrieved September 3, 2019.
  34. "South Korea Signals End to 'Final' Deal With Japan Over Wartime Sex Slaves". New York Times. November 21, 2018. Retrieved November 22, 2018.
  35. Kelly, Tim; Hyonhee, Shin (November 21, 2018). "South Korea risks ties by disbanding 'comfort women' fund: Japan PM". Reuters. Retrieved September 3, 2019.
  36. "South Korean court infuriates Japan by ordering Nippon Steel to compensate WWII workers". Channel NewsAsia. October 31, 2018.
  37. "S. Korea court orders Japan's Mitsubishi to pay compensation for wartime labor". Washington Post. November 29, 2018. Retrieved November 30, 2018.
  38. "Mitsubishi Heavy ordered to compensate forced S Korean war workers". BBC News. November 29, 2018.
  39. Sang-hun, Choe (October 30, 2014). "South Korean Court Orders Japanese Firm Nachi-Fujikoshi to Pay Forced Laborers". New York Times. Retrieved September 8, 2019.
  40. "Japanese company ordered to pay Korean slave labourers". The Australian. January 18, 2019. Retrieved September 8, 2019.
  41. "Court upholds wartime forced labor victim's compensation claim". Yonhap. January 23, 2019. Retrieved September 8, 2019.
  42. "SSouth Korea court orders Japanese firm Nachi-Fujikoshi to pay for forced labour". The Straits Times. January 18, 2019. Retrieved September 8, 2019.
  43. "Japan to seek talks with South Korea over Nippon Steel court decision". The Straits Times. January 9, 2019. Retrieved August 25, 2019.
  44. "Court approves seizure of Mitsubishi assets". Korea Joongang Daily. March 25, 2019. Retrieved August 25, 2019.
  45. "Tokyo snubs Seoul's proposed joint fund for wartime laborers". The Asahi Shimbun. June 19, 2019. Retrieved August 25, 2019.
  46. "Update of METI's licensing policies and procedures on exports of controlled items to the Republic of Korea" (Press release). METI. July 1, 2019. Retrieved July 1, 2019. ... Through careful consideration among the relevant ministries in Japan, the Government of Japan cannot help but state that the Japan-ROK relationship of trust including in the field of export control and regulation has been significantly undermined. Considering that certain issues in ROK's export control and regulation can only be addressed under a relationship of utmost trust, METI has concluded that it must change the current implementation practices such as licensing policies and procedures for export or transfer of controlled items and their relevant technologies to the ROK in order to ensure appropriate implementation of Japan’s own export control and regulation. In addition, as METI has recently found that certain sensitive items have been exported to the ROK with inadequate management by companies, METI will apply more stringent procedures over certain controlled items and their relevant technologies. ...
  47. "Japan rebuffs South Korea's calls to scrap export curbs". Al Jazeera. July 9, 2019. Retrieved August 5, 2019.
  48. "Japan moves to curb exports to South Korean tech firms, in escalation of forced labour row". South China Morning Post. July 1, 2019. Retrieved July 30, 2019.
  49. "Japan to restrict semiconductor-related exports to S. Korea". The Mainichi. Archived from the original on July 29, 2019. Retrieved August 5, 2019.
  50. "The Latest: Japan blames S.Korea export control 'weaknesses'". Associated Press. July 12, 2019. Retrieved July 30, 2019.
  51. Sugiyama, Satoshi (July 10, 2019). "Japan,'surprised' by South Korean response to export control, accuses Seoul of trying to make the issue about free trade". The Japan Times Online. The Japan Times.
  52. Furukawa, Katsuhisa; Sneider, Daniel (September 24, 2019). "RESOLVED: Japan Has More to Gain Than to Lose from Its Export Controls on South Korea". Debating Japan. Center for Strategic and International Studies. 2 (8). Retrieved July 14, 2020.
  53. "Tensions over history, North keep Japan, South Korea at odds". Federal News Network. July 11, 2019.
  54. "Japan-Korea trade row to grow with new Tokyo export limits". The Mainichi. July 29, 2019. Retrieved July 30, 2019.
  55. "Data shows Japanese firms illegally shipped strategic items to N. Korea: lawmaker". Yonhap. July 11, 2019.
  56. Farley, Robert (July 2, 2019). "Japanese Tech Export Controls on South Korea?". The Diplomat. Retrieved July 30, 2019.
  57. "S. Korea requests withdrawal of Japan's export controls to WTO". Hankyoreh. July 10, 2019.
  58. "Samsung heir Lee Jae-yong flies to Tokyo to seek support from Japanese suppliers". The Korea Herald. July 8, 2019.
  59. "Samsung Secures Japan Parts Resources To Prevent Production Lag". International Business Times. July 16, 2019.
  60. "Samsung heir returns from Japan amid trade row". Yonhap. July 12, 2019.
  61. "Japan, South Korea fail to mend dispute with frosty meeting". Reuters. July 12, 2019.
  62. "Today's Press Conference by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy of the Republic of Korea" (Press release). METI. July 19, 2019. Retrieved July 12, 2019.
  63. "Japan and South Korea clash at WTO over trade row". Reuters. July 24, 2019.
  64. "Japan, S. Korea trade barbs over export curbs at WTO". Mainichi Daily News. July 25, 2019. Archived from the original on July 29, 2019. Retrieved August 4, 2019.
  65. "The Cabinet Approved Partial Amendment to the Export Trade Control Order" (Press release). METI. August 2, 2019. Retrieved July 25, 2020.
  66. "Japan removes South Korea from preferred trade status, raising tensions". Marketwatch. Retrieved August 2, 2019.
  67. "Japan will strike South Korea off white list of trusted trade partners, effective Aug 28". The Straits Times. August 2, 2019. Retrieved August 2, 2019.
  68. "Japan Promulgates Ordinance to Tighten Export Controls on S. Korea". Nippon.com. August 7, 2019. Retrieved August 7, 2019.
  69. "Japan says export step not aimed at hurting ties with Seoul". Al Jazeera. Retrieved August 7, 2019.
  70. "Japan's new whitelist rules exclude additional 'strictly controlled' export items for now". The Korea Herald. August 7, 2019. Retrieved August 8, 2019.
  71. "The Cabinet Approved Partial Amendment to the Export Trade Control Order". Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (Japan). August 2, 2019. Retrieved September 18, 2019.
  72. Song-ho, Song (August 28, 2019). "Top diplomats of S. Korea, Japan trade barbs over Tokyo's whitelist exclusion". Yonhap. Retrieved September 30, 2019.
  73. "Tokyo-Seoul spat draws tense remarks at Asean meeting". The Straits Times. August 2, 2019. Retrieved September 30, 2019.
  74. "Japan approves S Korea chip material exports but tensions remain". Financial Times. Retrieved August 8, 2019.
  75. "Japan approves first hi-tech exports to South Korea since start of 'trade war' - but with a warning". South China Morning Post. August 9, 2019. Retrieved August 8, 2019.
  76. "Japan warns of stricter checks on exports to South Korea, grants first nod since July". Channel NewsAsia. Retrieved August 8, 2019.
  77. Hyunjoo, Jin (August 20, 2019). "Japan allows further exports of high-tech material to South Korea". Australian Financial Review. Retrieved September 24, 2019.
  78. "Korea holds off removing Japan from its whitelist". Korea Times. August 8, 2019. Retrieved August 8, 2019.
  79. "'A selfish, destructive act': Japan and South Korea cut each other from export whitelists as their trade war reignites World War II tensions". Business Insider. Retrieved August 4, 2019.
  80. "S.Korea removes Japan from whitelist of trusted export partners". Xinhua. August 12, 2019.
  81. Ji-hye, Shin (September 17, 2019). "Japan officially removed from South Korea's whitelist". The Korea Herald.
  82. "South Korea drops Japan from 'white list' in trade row". The Straits Times. September 17, 2019.
  83. Ji-hye, Shin (September 1, 2019). "Removal of Japan from whitelist to take effect this month". The Investor.
  84. Heekyong, Yang (September 17, 2019). "South Korea removes Japan from fast-track trade 'white list'". Reuters.
  85. "Regarding Today's Announcement by the ROK Government" (Press release). METI. July 28, 2019. Retrieved July 24, 2020.
  86. "Japan approves first export of hydrogen fluoride to South Korea since controls tightened". The Japan Times. August 30, 2019. Retrieved August 31, 2019.
  87. "Japan OKs 1st shipment of hydrogen fluoride to S. Korea since export curbs". The Korea Herald. August 29, 2019. Retrieved August 31, 2019.
  88. "METI submitted opinions and questions regarding the plans of the ROK to revise the Public Notice of the Exportation and Importation of Strategic Items" (Press release). METI. September 3, 2019. Retrieved July 27, 2020.
  89. White, Edward; Harding, Robin; Buseong, Kang (September 11, 2019). "South Korea files WTO complaint over Japan trade restrictions". Financial Times. Retrieved September 12, 2019.
  90. "South Korea will lodge WTO complaint over Japan's export curbs". Al Jazeera. September 11, 2019. Retrieved September 12, 2019.
  91. Sugiyama, Satoshi (September 20, 2019). "Japan agrees to WTO consultation with South Korea amid trade dispute". The Japan Times. Retrieved September 20, 2019.
  92. Kaneko, Kaori; Shimizu, Ritsuko (September 20, 2019). "Japan agrees to hold bilateral talks with S.Korea in WTO dispute". Reuters. Retrieved September 20, 2019.
  93. Narazaki, Takashi; Hajimu, Takeda (September 27, 2019). "Japan, S. Korea foreign ministers meet, but fail to thaw relations". The Asahi Shimbun. Retrieved September 27, 2019.
  94. Ahn, Shery; Wainer, David (September 27, 2019). "South Korea's Foreign Minister Says 'Big Disagreements' With Japan Persist". Bloomberg. Retrieved September 27, 2019.
  95. Sohee, Kim (October 1, 2019). "Japan Curbing Export of a Key Chipmaking Material, South Korea Says". Bloomberg. Retrieved October 7, 2019.
  96. "Japan Held Consultations with the Government of the Republic of Korea under the WTO Agreement Regarding Japan's Update of Licensing Policies and Procedures on Exports to the ROK" (Press release). METI. October 12, 2019. Retrieved July 28, 2020.
  97. Sohee, Kim (October 11, 2019). "S. Korea, Japan end 1st round of talks on trade row, agree to meet again". Yonhap. Retrieved October 12, 2019.
  98. "Japan Held Consultations under the WTO Agreement with the Government of the Republic of Korea Regarding Japan's Update of Licensing Policies and Procedures on Exports to the ROK". METI. November 20, 2019. Retrieved July 28, 2020.
  99. Nam, Sang-ho (November 20, 2019). 한일, 2차 협의 '평행선'…WTO 법적공방 가능성 커져. MBC News (in Korean). Retrieved November 20, 2019.
  100. "Director-General Level Preparatory Meeting for the Seventh Japan-Korea Export Control Policy Dialogue" (Press release). METI. December 5, 2019. Retrieved August 8, 2020.
  101. "The Seventh Japan-Korea Export Control Policy Dialogue Held" (Press release). METI. December 16, 2019. Retrieved August 9, 2020.
  102. "Announcement on the Eighth Japan-Korea Export Control Policy Dialogue" (Press release). METI. February 21, 2020. Retrieved August 9, 2020.
  103. "Announcement on the Eighth Japan-Korea Export Control Policy Dialogue" (Press release). METI. March 6, 2020. Retrieved August 9, 2020.
  104. "The Eighth Japan-Korea Export Control Policy Dialogue" (Press release). METI. March 11, 2020. Retrieved August 10, 2020.
  105. "Press Conference by Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry Kajiyama (provisional translation excerpted version)" (PDF) (Press release). METI. June 19, 2020. Retrieved August 10, 2020.
  106. "Press Conference by Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry Kajiyama (provisional translation excerpted version)" (PDF) (Press release). METI. June 30, 2020. Retrieved August 10, 2020.
  107. "Statement to media by Minister Sung on MOTIE's letter sent to Japan's METI". Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (South Korea). July 24, 2019. Retrieved August 24, 2019.
  108. "Letter by the ROK government regarding Japan's plan to revise its export controls (Summary)". Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (South Korea). July 30, 2019. Retrieved August 24, 2019.
  109. Yang, Cheng (July 7, 2019). "Japan's curbs on semiconductor material exports to S.Korea will likely worsen ties". Global Times. Retrieved July 28, 2019.
  110. "South Korea eyes taking Japan to WTO over export curbs". Kyodo News. July 1, 2019. Retrieved July 28, 2019.
  111. "Japan export curbs could be prolonged, says South Korea's Moon". Al Jazeera. Retrieved July 28, 2019.
  112. "President Moon warns of retaliation, urges Japan to negotiate". The Korea Herald. August 2, 2019. Retrieved August 2, 2019.
  113. "As trade row with Japan heats up, South Korea vows not to be 'defeated again". France 24. August 2, 2019. Retrieved August 4, 2019.
  114. "Korea to restrict imports from Japan's Fukushima". The Korea Times. August 4, 2019. Retrieved August 7, 2019.
  115. "S. Korea's Moon offers to "join hands" if Japan seeks dialogue". Kyodo News. Retrieved August 16, 2019.
  116. "SSouth Korea to spend $6.5 billion on R&D to cut reliance on Japanese imports". Reuters. August 5, 2019.
  117. Jun-suk, Yeo (August 29, 2019). "As Japan lowers Korea's trade status, Seoul announces W5tr plan to boost materials capacity". The Korea Herald.
  118. Kwang-tae, Kim (August 29, 2019). "S. Korea unveils record high budget for 2020". Yonhap.
  119. "S. Korean Regional Gov'ts Boycott Japanese Products, Bilateral Exchanges". KBS World Radio. Retrieved August 6, 2019.
  120. Sim, Walter (September 7, 2019). "Seoul, Busan pass laws to boycott Japan 'war crime firms'". The Straits Times. Retrieved September 8, 2019.
  121. "South Korea's 2 major cities pass bill to boycott 'war crime' firms". Nikkei Asian Review. September 6, 2019. Retrieved September 8, 2019.
  122. "S. Korea's 2 major cities pass bill to boycott 'war crime' firms". Mainichi Daily News. September 6, 2019. Retrieved September 8, 2019.
  123. Ji-won, Park (July 4, 2019). "Opposition party floor leader raps Abe for trade retaliation". The Korea Times. Retrieved August 7, 2019.
  124. He-suk, Choi (July 10, 2019). "[News focus] Japan's export curbs fuel political feud in S. Korea". The Korea Herald. Retrieved August 7, 2019.
  125. Suk-yee, Jung (July 18, 2019). "Ruling and Opposition Parties Seeking Different Solutions to Japan's Economic Retaliation". Business Korea. Retrieved August 7, 2019.
  126. "President Moon, 5 party chiefs discuss Japan's export curbs". Korea.net. July 18, 2019.
  127. Ji-won, Park (July 29, 2019). "Parties to establish body to tackle disputes with Japan". The Korea Times. Retrieved August 7, 2019.
  128. "How Japan's failure to atone for past sins threatens the global economy". Washington Post. August 11, 2019. Retrieved August 12, 2019.
  129. "South Koreans call for boycott of Japanese products amid wartime labour dispute". Channel NewsAsia. July 5, 2019. Retrieved July 28, 2019.
  130. "South Koreans call for boycott of Japanese cars, beer and cosmetics as 'trade war' intensifies". South China Morning Post. July 4, 2019. Retrieved July 28, 2019.
  131. "South Koreans are cancelling their Japan trip amid trade war". Travel Daily Media. July 23, 2019.
  132. "Calls for boycott of Japan grow in South Korea as diplomatic row simmers". Reuters. July 23, 2019.
  133. "[Feature] Boycott of Japanese goods, services spreads rapidly". The Korea Herald. July 22, 2019. Retrieved October 8, 2019.
  134. "Anti-Abe protest in Seoul". The Korea Times. July 27, 2019.
  135. "Thousands of South Koreans Protest Japanese Trade Curbs". The Korea Times. August 3, 2019.
  136. "Students hold anti-Abe protest, demand Seoul's withdrawal from intel-sharing pact with Tokyo". Yonhap. August 10, 2019.
  137. "Candlelight vigil held in South Korea to protest Japan's government". CGTN. August 11, 2019.
  138. 74주년 광복절, 'NO 아베' 물결 계속된다…광화문서 10만명 촛불문화제. Korea Economic Daily (in Korean). August 15, 2019.
  139. "Anti-Japan demonstrations mark Korean independence day celebration". UPI. August 15, 2019.
  140. "Thunder of protest echoes across Seoul – but voices mixed". Asia Times. August 15, 2019.
  141. "South Korean man dies after setting himself on fire outside Japanese embassy in Seoul". CNN. July 19, 2019.
  142. "S Korean man sets himself ablaze in protest against Japan". Japan Today. August 1, 2019.
  143. "Second S Korean man sets himself ablaze in apparent Japan protest". Al Jazeera. August 1, 2019.
  144. "Anime 'Doraemon' Latest Victim of Japan-South Korea Trade War". The Hollywood Reporter. August 4, 2019.
  145. "Widening boycott of Japanese goods seeps into culture sector". Yonhap. August 5, 2019.
  146. "Over 6 in 10 Koreans taking part in boycott of Japanese goods: poll". The Korea Herald. July 25, 2019. Retrieved August 7, 2019.
  147. '일제 불매운동' 현재 참여자, 48% → 55% → 63%. Realmeter (in Korean). July 25, 2019. Retrieved August 7, 2019.
  148. "Koreans' view of Japan falls to record low: poll". The Korea Times. July 12, 2019. Retrieved August 7, 2019.
  149. Jae-hyuk, Park (August 12, 2019). "KIC also urged to stop investing in Japan". The Korea Times. Retrieved August 14, 2019.
  150. Jae-hyuk, Park (August 12, 2019). "NPS urged to stop investments in Japan". The Korea Times. Retrieved August 14, 2019.
  151. White, Edward; Jung-a, Song; Inagaki, Kana (August 12, 2019). "Korean pension fund reviews Japan investments over 'war crimes". Financial Times. Retrieved August 14, 2019.
  152. Suk-yee, Jung (July 25, 2019). "Chemical Industry Most Dependent on Japanese Materials and Components". Business Korea. Retrieved August 24, 2019.
  153. Ji-hye, Shin (July 11, 2019). "[News Analysis] Why is Korea so dependent on Japanese materials?". The Korea Herald. Retrieved August 24, 2019.
  154. He-suk, Choi (July 30, 2019). "[News focus] No easy way out for Seoul-Tokyo deadlock". The Korea Herald. Retrieved August 24, 2019.
  155. Hyun-mook, Choi (July 5, 2019). "Korea Has Few Options Over Japan's Export Restrictions". The Chosunilbo. Retrieved August 24, 2019.
  156. Je-hae, Do (July 26, 2019). "Moon needs strategic response to deal with Japan row". The Korea Times. Retrieved August 24, 2019.
  157. "Security Export Control" (PDF). METI. Retrieved July 18, 2020.
  158. "Outline of Export Control and Update" (PDF). METI. Retrieved July 18, 2020.
  159. "Japan's Position on the Press Conference by MOTIE of the ROK on July 24th". METI. July 24, 2019. Retrieved August 24, 2019.
  160. Leussink, Daniel (August 13, 2019). "Japan says South Korea failed to justify trade restriction". Reuters.
  161. "Japan Says S. Korea Failed to Explain Reason for New Trade Restrictions". VOA News. August 13, 2019. Retrieved August 14, 2019.
  162. Hosokawa, Masahiko (July 3, 2019). "補足解説：誤解だらけの「韓国に対する輸出規制発動」" [Appendix: So many misunderstandings about the implementation of export control]. Nikkei Business. Nikei BP. Retrieved July 12, 2020.
  163. Hosokawa, Masahiko (July 5, 2019). "補足解説2：誤解だらけの「韓国に対する輸出規制発動」" [Appendix 2: So many misunderstandings about the implementation of export control]. Nikkei Business. Nikei BP. Retrieved July 12, 2020.
  164. "Concerned citizens slam Tokyo over downward spiral in ties with South Korea". Japan Times. July 26, 2019.
  165. "Survey: 35% of voters picking LDP in election, 12% for CDP". The Asahi Shimbun. July 15, 2019. Retrieved August 7, 2019.
  166. "Japanese protesters march against Abe in Tokyo". Arirang. August 5, 2019.
  167. "Protesters in Japan call on Shinzo Abe to resign amid South Korea row". UPI.com. August 8, 2019.
  168. 아베 관저 앞 "아베 퇴진"…"한국은 적 아니다". MBC News (in Korean). August 8, 2019.
  169. "Busan: Hirokazu Kore-eda Calls for Artistic Solidarity Across Borders Amid Japan-Korea Trade War". The Hollywood Reporter. October 5, 2019.
  170. "U.S. tech industry voices concerns over Japan's export restrictions against S. Korea". Dong-A Ilbo. July 25, 2019. Retrieved July 29, 2019.
  171. "U.S. Tech Warns Japan-South Korea Spat Could Cause Global Harm". Bloomberg. July 24, 2019. Retrieved July 29, 2019.
  172. "The Latest: SKorea to drop Japan from own trade 'whitelist'". ABC News. Retrieved August 1, 2019.
  173. "(3rd LD) Trump says S. Korea-Japan row puts U.S. in 'very bad' position". Yonhap. August 10, 2019.
  174. "South Korea vs. Japan: The Trade War the World Needs to Watch". The National Interest. July 28, 2019. Retrieved August 24, 2019.
  175. Arrington, Celeste (July 18, 2019). "Japan claims it's restricting exports to South Korea because of 'national security.' Here's the real reason why". The Washington Post. Retrieved August 24, 2019.
  176. Reynolds, Isabel; Lee, Jihye (July 11, 2019). "No exit in sight from worst Japan-South Korea dispute in decades". The Japan Times. Retrieved August 24, 2019.
  177. Shao, Grace (August 24, 2019). "Tension between Japan and South Korea is rising, and it looks set to drag down trade". CNBC. Retrieved August 24, 2019.
  178. Shao, Grace (August 22, 2019). "China treads a fine line as it seeks to mediate in Japan-South Korea trade dispute". CNBC. Retrieved August 24, 2019.
  179. Joohee, Cho (July 17, 2019). "South Korea and Japan trade dispute could lead to 'dire consequences,' official warns". ABC News. Retrieved August 24, 2019.
  180. Jung-a, Song (September 25, 2019). "South Korea and Japan business leaders call for end to dispute". Financial Times. Retrieved October 2, 2019.
  181. Hosokawa, Rontaro (July 14, 2019). "WTO agrees to discuss Japan's export curbs on South Korea". Nikkei Asian Review. Retrieved August 4, 2019.
  182. Agence France-Presse (July 24, 2019). "S. Korea Trade Complaints 'Not Acceptable,' Japan Tells WTO". VOA. Retrieved July 22, 2020.
  183. Miles, Tom (July 24, 2019). "Japan and South Korea clash at WTO over trade row". Reuters. Retrieved August 7, 2019.
  184. "Japan, South Korea agree on need for dialogue to repair frayed ties". Channel NewsAsia. August 21, 2019.
  185. "China urges Japan, South Korea to resolve dispute through dialogue". Kyodo News. August 21, 2019.
  186. "Abe, Lee still far apart over WWII compensation at Tokyo meeting". The Asahi Shimbun. October 25, 2019. Retrieved November 8, 2019.
  187. "[News analysis] Moon and Abe take surprise 11-minute meeting in Bangkok". Hankyoreh. November 5, 2019. Retrieved November 8, 2019.
  188. Takao Harakawa (November 11, 2019). "Japanese Officials Irked by South Korea's 'Photo Ambush' of Prime Minister Abe at ASEAN Meeting". Japan Forward. Retrieved August 9, 2020.
  189. "Asia falls after Trump announces more tariffs on China; Hong Kong, Japan drop more than 2%". CNBC.com. August 2, 2019.
  190. "Trading on South Korea's tech-heavy Kosdaq suspended after stocks slide". The Straits Times. August 5, 2019.
  191. "Seoul stocks dip to 7-month low, Korean won sinks amid escalating trade tensions". Yonhap. August 2, 2019.
  192. "Korean won sinks to over 3-yr low amid escalating trade tensions". Yonhap. August 5, 2019.
  193. "S.Korea stocks slump over 2% on escalating tension with Japan, trade worries". Reuters. August 5, 2019.
  194. Fujikawa, Megumi (September 2, 2019). "US China Trade War Takes Tool on South Korea and Japan". Retrieved September 17, 2019.
  195. Suk-yee, Jung (July 11, 2019). "S&P Lowers S. Korea's economic growth outlook for 2019 from 2.4% to 2.0%". Business Korea. Retrieved August 7, 2019.
  196. Jae-hyuk, Park (July 16, 2019). "Fitch may cut Korea's growth outlook to below 2%". The Korea Times. Retrieved August 7, 2019.
  197. Jae-hyuk, Park (July 17, 2019). "Skepticism growing over Korean economy". The Korea Times. Retrieved August 7, 2019.
  198. Nam-ku, Jeong (July 19, 2019). "Bank of Korea to lower benchmark interest rate". Hankyoreh. Retrieved August 7, 2019.
  199. Kim, Sam (October 15, 2019). "Bank of Korea Warns of Weaker Growth After Cutting Rates Again". Bloomberg. Retrieved October 23, 2019.
  200. "Moody's revises down 2019, 2020 economic growth outlooks for S. Korea". Yonhap. August 26, 2019.
  201. Seok-hwan, Chung; Hyo-jin, Kim (August 26, 2019). "Moody's revises down Korea's growth outlook amid trade spat with Japan". Pulse.
  202. "Consumer sentiment plunges to over 2-year low in August". Yonhap. August 27, 2019.
  203. Jiyeun, Lee (August 27, 2019). "Korean Consumers Slide Into Gloomiest Mood Since January 2017". Bloomberg.
  204. Yeon-joo, Kim; Jee-hyun, Cho (July 26, 2019). "Moody's revises down Korea's growth outlook amid trade spat with Japan". Pulse News.
  205. "WTO lowers trade forecast as tensions unsettle global economy" (PDF) (Press release). World Trade Organization. October 1, 2019. Retrieved October 3, 2019. ... The darkening outlook for trade is discouraging but not unexpected. Beyond their direct effects, trade conflicts heighten uncertainty, which is leading some businesses to delay the productivity-enhancing investments that are essential to raising living standards ...
  206. Tan, Weizhen (October 23, 2019). "Growth in major Asian economies set to slow more than expected, IMF says". CNBC. Retrieved October 23, 2019.
  207. Moon-hee, Choi (July 30, 2019). "Credit card sales of Japanese Retailers Falling due to Koreans' Boycott of Japanese Goods". Business Korea. Retrieved August 7, 2019.
  208. Da-sol, Kim (August 2, 2019). "Uniqlo records 40 percent drop in sales, closes its Jongno 3-ga store". The Korea Herald. Retrieved August 7, 2019.
  209. "Uniqlo-owner Fast Retailing keeps posting record profits, but one analyst warns of uncertainty". CNBC.com. October 11, 2019. Retrieved October 26, 2019.
  210. "Aug. foreign car sales dip 5.6 pct on weak Japanese car demand". Yonhap. September 4, 2019.
  211. "Sales of Japanese cars in South Korea slump amid growing diplomatic tensions". CNBC. August 5, 2019. Retrieved September 4, 2019.
  212. "Japanese car sales plunge in S. Korea as trade row rages". France 24. September 4, 2019.
  213. Shinhye, Kang (September 3, 2019). "South Koreans Appear to Have Lost Their Taste for Japanese Beer". Bloomberg. Retrieved September 17, 2019.
  214. Garikipati, Ram (September 16, 2019). "Imports of Japanese beer fall sharply on boycott". The Investor. Retrieved September 17, 2019.
  215. 国籍/月別 訪日外客数(2003年～2019年) [Number of inbound visitors to Japan - by country, by month (2003 - 2019)] (PDF) (in Japanese). Japan National Tourism Organization.
  216. 訪日外国人消費動向調査 [Inbound visitors spending survey] (PDF) (in Japanese). Japan Tourism Agency. July 17, 2019.
  217. "Japan's August current account surplus up 18%". The Japan Times Online. The Japan Times. October 8, 2019.
  218. 韓国人客半減でも旅行収支黒字は過去最高 ８月国際収支 [Travel balance record high despite Korean visitors down by half - August balance of payments] (in Japanese). Sankei Shimbun. October 8, 2019.
  219. 韓国からの旅行者、９月は５８％減…関係悪化で手控える動き [South Korean traveller, 58% decrease in September...refrain from travelling as worsening relationships] (in Japanese). Sankei Shimbun. October 16, 2019.
  220. Shao, Grace (July 31, 2019). "The escalating dispute between Tokyo and Seoul is already affecting businesses". CNBC. Retrieved August 7, 2019.
  221. Allen, Michael (August 21, 2019). "Korean Air suspends more Japan routes amid Korea-Japan tensions". Business Traveller. Retrieved September 14, 2019.
  222. Hyun, Noh; Eun-joo, Lee (August 14, 2019). "Air Seoul becomes last S. Korean airline to roll back Japan services". Pulse. Retrieved September 14, 2019.
  223. Yeung, Jessie (August 10, 2019). "Airfares from Japan to South Korea drop to under $10". CNN. Retrieved September 14, 2019.
  224. Eguchi, Go (September 8, 2019). "$9 to Seoul: Airfares from Japan to South Korea dive as ties fray". Nikkei Asian Review. Retrieved September 14, 2019.
  225. "S. Korea reviewing military intel-sharing pact with Japan". China Daily. Retrieved August 22, 2019.
  226. Choe, Sang-Hun; Motoko, Rich; Wong, Edward (August 22, 2019). "South Korea Says It Will End Intelligence-Sharing Deal With Japan, Adding to Tensions". New York Times.
  227. "South Korea Ends Pact to Share Military Information With Japan". Wall Street Journal. August 22, 2019.
  228. "Editorial: Tokyo, Seoul both to blame for failing ties, both must seek solution". Mainichi Daily News. August 23, 2019. Retrieved September 25, 2019.
  229. "S. Korea to scrap military info-sharing pact with Japan: Cheong Wa Dae". Yonhap. August 22, 2019.
  230. "Kang says decision to end military pact with Japan separate from S. Korea-U.S. alliance". Yonhap. August 22, 2019.
  231. "South Korea reverses decision to suspend intelligence deal with Japan". Reuters. November 22, 2019.
  232. "'No Japan' flags in Seoul streets taken down in face of public outrage". Korea Herald. August 6, 2019.
  233. "Anti-Japan banners hung by Seoul district taken down after outcry". The Japan Times Online. August 6, 2019.
  234. "Kolmar Korea chairman quits over 'controversial' video". Korea Times. August 11, 2019.
  235. "Boss of South Korean cosmetics firm Kolmar quits after backlash over YouTube clip praising Japan's conduct in 'trade war'". South China Morning Post. August 11, 2019.
  236. "Korean cosmetics firm in hot water over video praising Japan in trade row". Reuters. August 9, 2019.
  237. "Japan's DHC TV revives 'hate speech' controversy". The Korea Times. August 15, 2019.

Further reading
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.