Gymnophiona

Gymnophiona is the group of amphibians that includes the legless caecilians and all amphibians more closely related to them than to frogs or salamanders (the "stem-caecilians").[3] The name derives from the Greek words γυμνος (gymnos, naked) and οφις (ophis, snake), as the caecilians were originally thought to be related to snakes. The body is cylindrical dark brown or bluish black in colour. The skin is slimy and bears grooves or ringlike markings; there are minute dermal scales.

Gymnophiona
Temporal range:
Late TriassicPresent,[1] 199.6–0 Ma
Caecilia pulchraserrana
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Amphibia
Subclass: Lissamphibia
Order: Gymnophiona
Müller, 1832[2]
Subgroups
Synonyms[2]

Evolution

Little is known of the evolutionary history of the caecilian lineage, which has left a sparse fossil record. The first fossil belonging to this group, a vertebra dated to the Paleocene, was not discovered until 1972.[4] The first pre-Cenozoic genus, Eocaecilia, had small limbs and well-developed eyes.[5]

In their 2008 description of the fossil batrachian Gerobatrachus,[6] Anderson and co-authors suggested that caecilians arose from the Lepospondyl group of ancestral tetrapods, and may be more closely related to amniotes than to frogs and salamanders, which arose from Temnospondyl ancestors. Numerous groups of lepospondyls evolved reduced limbs, elongated bodies, and burrowing behaviors, and morphological studies on Permian and Carboniferous lepospondyls have placed the early caecilian (Eocaecilia) among these groups.[7] Divergent origins of caecilians and other extant amphibians may help explain the slight discrepancy between fossil dates for the origins of modern amphibia, which suggest Permian origins, and the earlier dates, in the Carboniferous, predicted by some molecular clock studies of DNA sequences. Most morphological and molecular studies of extant amphibians, however, support monophyly for caecilians, frogs, and salamanders, and the most recent molecular study based on multi-locus data suggest a Late Carboniferous–Early Permian origin of extant amphibians.[8] The Late Triassic stem-caecilian Chinlestegophis from the Chinle Formation of Colorado bolsters the proposed pre-Triassic origin of Lissamphibia suggested by molecular clocks by filling a gap in the fossil record of early caecilians and suggesting that groups of stereospondyls, including Metoposauridae, are closely related to caecilians.[9]

Relationships

The most recent phylogeny of caecilians is based on molecular mitogenomic evidence examined by San Mauro et al. (2014).[10]

Gymnophiona

Eocaecilia micropodia

Rubricacaecilia monbaroni

Apoda

Rhinatrematidae

 Stegokrotaphia

Ichthyophiidae

 Teresomata

Scolecomorphidae

Chikilidae

Herpelidae

Caeciliidae

Typhlonectidae

Indotyphlidae

Dermophiidae

Siphonopidae

gollark: Basic religion is when you pray to one apioform, fancy religion is where you pray to apioforms generally, or invisible apioforms in the sky.
gollark: Replying to https://discord.com/channels/346530916832903169/348702212110680064/747850111677366394No. It still makes your decisions/beliefs stupider.
gollark: Replying to https://discord.com/channels/346530916832903169/348702212110680064/747849927887028334Just donate x% of your income to efficient charities or something.
gollark: Am I still allowed to worship apioforms?
gollark: yes.

References

  1. Nussbaum, Ronald A. (1998). Cogger, H.G.; Zweifel, R.G. (eds.). Encyclopedia of Reptiles and Amphibians. San Diego: Academic Press. pp. 52–59. ISBN 0-12-178560-2.
  2. Frost, Darrel R. (2019). "Gymnophiona Müller, 1832". Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 6.0. American Museum of Natural History. Retrieved 11 September 2019.
  3. Evans, Susan E. & Sigogneau-Russell, Denise (2001). "A stem-group caecilian (Lissamphibia: Gymnophiona) from the Lower Cretaceous of North Africa". Palaeontology. 44 (2): 259–273. doi:10.1111/1475-4983.00179.
  4. Estes, Richard & Wake, Marvalee H. (22 September 1972). "The first fossil record of caecilian amphibians". Nature. 239 (5369): 228–231. doi:10.1038/239228b0.
  5. Jenkins, Parish A. & Walsh, Denis M. (16 September 1993). "An Early Jurassic caecilian with limbs". Nature. 365 (6443): 246–250. doi:10.1038/365246a0.
  6. Anderson, Jason S.; Reisz, Robert R.; Scott, Diane; Fröbisch, Nadia B. & Sumida, Stuart S. (2008). "A stem batrachian from the Early Permian of Texas and the origin of frogs and salamanders". Nature. 453 (7194): 515–518. doi:10.1038/nature06865. PMID 18497824.
  7. Huttenlocker, A. K.; Pardo, J. D.; Small, B. J. & Anderson, J. S. (2013). "Cranial morphology of recumbirostrans (Lepospondyli) from the Permian of Kansas and Nebraska, and early morphological evolution inferred by micro-computed tomography". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 33 (3): 540–552. doi:10.1080/02724634.2013.728998..
  8. San Mauro, D. (2010). "A multilocus timescale for the origin of extant amphibians". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 56 (2): 554–561. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2010.04.019. PMID 20399871.
  9. Pardo, Jason D.; Small, Bryan J. & Huttenlocker, Adam K. (2017). "Stem caecilian from the Triassic of Colorado sheds light on the origins of Lissamphibia". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 114 (27): E5389–E5395. doi:10.1073/pnas.1706752114. PMC 5502650. PMID 28630337.
  10. San Mauro, D.; Gower, D. J.; Müller, H.; Loader, S. P.; Zardoya, R.; Nussbaum, R. A. & Wilkinson, M. (2014). "Life-history evolution and mitogenomic phylogeny of caecilian amphibians". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 73: 177–189. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2014.01.009. hdl:10261/123960. PMID 24480323..
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.