Expander cycle

The expander cycle is a power cycle of a bipropellant rocket engine. In this cycle, the fuel is used to cool the engine's combustion chamber, picking up heat and changing phase. The heated, now gaseous, fuel then powers the turbine that drives the engine's fuel and oxidizer pumps before being injected into the combustion chamber and burned.

Expander rocket cycle. Expander rocket engine (closed cycle). Heat from the nozzle and combustion chamber powers the fuel and oxidizer pumps.

Because of the necessary phase change, the expander cycle is thrust limited by the square-cube rule. As the size of a bell-shaped nozzle increases with increasing thrust, the nozzle surface area (from which heat can be extracted to expand the fuel) increases as the square of the radius. However, the volume of fuel that must be heated increases as the cube of the radius. Thus there exists a maximum engine size of approximately 300 kN (70,000 lbf) of thrust beyond which there is no longer enough nozzle area to heat enough fuel to drive the turbines and hence the fuel pumps. Higher thrust levels can be achieved using a bypass expander cycle where a portion of the fuel bypasses the turbine and or thrust chamber cooling passages and goes directly to the main chamber injector. Non-toroidal aerospike engines do not suffer from the same limitations because the linear shape of the engine is not subject to the square-cube law. As the width of the engine increases, both the volume of fuel to be heated and the available thermal energy increase linearly, allowing arbitrarily wide engines to be constructed. All expander cycle engines need to use a cryogenic fuel such as hydrogen, methane, or propane that easily reach their boiling points.

Some expander cycle engines may use a gas generator of some kind to start the turbine and run the engine until the heat input from the thrust chamber and nozzle skirt increases as the chamber pressure builds up.

In an open cycle, or "bleed" expander cycle, only some of the fuel is heated to drive the turbines, which is then vented to atmosphere to increase turbine efficiency. While this increases power output, the dumped fuel leads to a decrease in propellant efficiency (lower engine specific impulse). A closed cycle expander engine sends the turbine exhaust to the combustion chamber (see image at right.)

Some examples of an expander cycle engine are the Aerojet Rocketdyne RL10 and the Vinci engine for the future Ariane 6.[1]

Expander bleed cycle (open cycle)
Expander bleed cycle. Expander open cycle (Also named coolant tap-off).

This operational cycle is a modification of the traditional expander cycle. In the bleed (or open) cycle, instead of routing heated propellant through the turbine and sending it back to be combusted, only a small portion of the propellant is heated and used to drive the turbine and is then bled off, being vented overboard without going through the combustion chamber. Bleeding off the turbine exhaust allows for a higher turbopump output by decreasing backpressure and maximizing the pressure drop through the turbine. Compared with a standard expander cycle, this leads to higher engine thrust at the cost of efficiency by wasting the bled propellant.[2][3]

Dual expander (closed cycle)

In a similar way that the staged combustion can be implemented separately on the oxidizer and fuel on the full flow cycle, the expander cycle can be implemented on two separate paths as the dual expander cycle. The use of hot gases of the same chemistry as the liquid for the turbine and pump side of the turbopumps eliminates the need for purges and some failure modes. Additionally, when the density of the fuel and oxidizer is significantly different, as it is in the H2/LOX case, the optimal turbopump speeds differ so much that they need a gearbox between the fuel and oxidizer pumps.[4][5] The use of dual expander cycle, with separate turbines, eliminates this failure-prone piece of equipment.[5]

Dual expander cycle can be implemented by either using separated sections on the regenerative cooling system for the fuel and the oxidizer, or by using a single fluid for cooling and a heat exchanger to boil the second fluid. In the first case, for example, you could use the fuel to cool the combustion chamber, and the oxidizer to cool the nozzle. In the second case, you could use the fuel to cool the whole engine and a heat exchanger to boil the oxidizer.[5]

Advantages

The expander cycle has a number of advantages over other designs:

Low temperature
After they have turned gaseous, the propellants are usually near room temperature, and do very little or no damage to the turbine, allowing the engine to be reusable. In contrast gas-generator or staged combustion engines operate their turbines at high temperature.
Tolerance
During the development of the RL10 engineers were worried that insulation foam mounted on the inside of the tank might break off and damage the engine. They tested this by putting loose foam in a fuel tank and running it through the engine. The RL10 chewed it up without problems or noticeable degradation in performance. Conventional gas-generators are in practice miniature rocket engines, with all the complexity that implies. Blocking even a small part of a gas generator can lead to a hot spot, which can cause violent loss of the engine. Using the engine bell as a 'gas generator' also makes it very tolerant of fuel contamination because of the wider fuel flow channels used.
Inherent safety
Because a bell-type expander-cycle engine is thrust limited, it can easily be designed to withstand its maximum thrust conditions. In other engine types, a stuck fuel valve or similar problem can lead to engine thrust spiraling out of control due to unintended feedback systems. Other engine types require complex mechanical or electronic controllers to ensure this does not happen. Expander cycles are by design incapable of malfunctioning that way.

Usage

Expander cycle engines include the following:

Comparison of upper-stage expander-cycle engines
Specifications
　 RL10B-2 BE-3U Vinci YF-75D RD-0146D LE-5A LE-5B
Country of origin  United States  United States  France  People's Republic of China  Russia  Japan  Japan
Cycle Expander Expander bleed cycle Expander Expander Expander Expander bleed cycle,
nozzle expander		 Expander bleed cycle,
chamber expander
Thrust, vac. 110 kN (25,000 lbf) 710 kN (160,000 lbf)[7] 180 kN (40,000 lbf) 88.26 kN (19,840 lbf) 68.6 kN (15,400 lbf) 121.5 kN (27,310 lbf) 137.2 kN (30,840 lbf)
Mixture ratio 5.88 5.8 6.0 5 5
Nozzle ratio 280 240 80 130 110
Isp, vac. (s) 462[8] 465 442 470 452 447
Chamber pressure (MPa) 4.412 6.1 4.1 5.9 3.98 3.58
LH2 TP (rpm) 65,000 98,180 51,000 52,000
LOX TP (rpm) 17,000 18,000
Length (m) 4.14 4.2 3.358 2.69 2.79
Dry mass (kg) 277 280 248 285
gollark: No it's not.
gollark: Since Haskell is lazily evaluated, that list can be said to contain all the output the program will ever receive during this run.
gollark: "expandable" how?
gollark: DO NOTATION SIMPLIFIER!KILL THEM!
gollark: Of course, RuST is better.

See also

References
  1. , retrieved 21 February 2017
  2. Sippel, Martin; Imoto, Takayuki; Haeseler, Dietrich (July 23, 2003). Studies on Expander Bleed Cycle Engines for Launchers (PDF). 39th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit. AIAA. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-03. Retrieved 2016-09-25.
  3. Atsumi, Masahiro; Yoshikawa, Kimito; Ogawara, Akira; Onga, Tadaoki (December 2011). "Development of the LE-X Engine" (PDF). Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries. 48 (4): 36–43. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-12-24. Retrieved 2016-09-25.
  4. Sutton, George P.; Biblarz, Oscar (2000). "Section 6.6". Rocket Propulsion Elements: an introduction to the engineering of rockets (PDF) (Seventh ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. pp. 221–227. ISBN 0-471-32642-9. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-01-19. Retrieved 26 September 2016.
  5. US patent 7,418,814 B1, Greene, William D., "Dual expander cycle rocket engine with an intermediate, closed-cycle heat exchanger", issued 2008-09-02, assigned to The United States of America as represented by the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  6. "Pratt & Whitney Space Propulsion – RL60 fact sheet". Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-03-29. Retrieved 2008-12-28.
  7. https://www.blueorigin.com/engines/be-3
  8. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2017-04-30. Retrieved 2017-06-06.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.