Space tether

Space tethers are long cables which can be used for propulsion, momentum exchange, stabilization and attitude control, or maintaining the relative positions of the components of a large dispersed satellite/spacecraft sensor system.[1] Depending on the mission objectives and altitude, spaceflight using this form of spacecraft propulsion is theorized to be significantly less expensive than spaceflight using rocket engines.

Artist's conception of satellite with a tether

Main techniques

Tether satellites might be used for various purposes, including research into tether propulsion, tidal stabilization and orbital plasma dynamics. Five main techniques for employing space tethers are in development:[2][3]

Electrodynamic tethers

Electrodynamic tethers are primarily used for propulsion. These are conducting tethers that carry a current that can generate either thrust or drag from a planetary magnetic field, in much the same way as an electric motor does.

Momentum exchange tethers

These can be either rotating tethers, or non-rotating tethers, that capture an arriving spacecraft and then release it at a later time into a different orbit with a different velocity. Momentum exchange tethers can be used for orbital maneuvering, or as part of a planetary-surface-to-orbit / orbit-to-escape-velocity space transportation system.

Tethered formation flying

This is typically a non-conductive tether that accurately maintains a set distance between multiple space vehicles flying in formation.

Electric sail

A form of solar wind sail with electrically charged tethers that will be pushed by the momentum of solar wind ions.

Universal Orbital Support System

A concept for suspending an object from a tether orbiting in space.

Many uses for space tethers have been proposed, including deployment as space elevators, as skyhooks, and for doing propellant-free orbital transfers.

History

Konstantin Tsiolkovsky once proposed a tower so tall that it reached into space, so that it would be held there by the rotation of the Earth. However, at the time, there was no realistic way to build it.

In 1960, another Russian, Yuri Artsutanov, wrote in greater detail about the idea of a tensile cable to be deployed from a geosynchronous satellite, downwards towards the ground, and upwards away, keeping the cable balanced.[4] This is the space elevator idea, a type of synchronous tether that would rotate with the earth. However, given the materials technology of the time, this too was impractical on Earth.

In the 1970s, Jerome Pearson independently conceived the idea of a space elevator, sometimes referred to as a synchronous tether,[5] and, in particular, analyzed a lunar elevator that can go through the L1 and L2 points, and this was found to be possible with materials then existing.

In 1977, Hans Moravec[6] and later Robert L. Forward investigated the physics of non-synchronous skyhooks, also known as rotating skyhooks, and performed detailed simulations of tapered rotating tethers that could pick objects off, and place objects onto, the Moon, Mars and other planets, with little loss, or even a net gain of energy.[7][8]

In 1979, NASA examined the feasibility of the idea and gave direction to the study of tethered systems, especially tethered satellites.[1][9]

In 1990, E. Sarmont proposed a non-rotating Orbiting Skyhook for an Earth-to-orbit / orbit-to-escape-velocity Space Transportation System in a paper titled "An Orbiting Skyhook: Affordable Access to Space".[10][11][12] In this concept a suborbital launch vehicle would fly to the bottom end of a Skyhook, while spacecraft bound for higher orbit, or returning from higher orbit, would use the upper end.

In 2000, NASA and Boeing considered a HASTOL concept, where a rotating tether would take payloads from a hypersonic aircraft (at half of orbital velocity) to orbit.[13]

Missions
Graphic of the US Naval Research Laboratory's TiPS tether satellite. Only a small part of the 4 km tether is shown deployed.
Main article: Space tether missions

A tether satellite is a satellite connected to another by a space tether. A number of satellites have been launched to test tether technologies, with varying degrees of success.

Types

There are many different (and overlapping) types of tether.

Momentum exchange tethers, rotating
Main article: Momentum exchange tether

Momentum Exchange Tethers are one of many applications for space tethers. Momentum Exchange Tethers come in two types; rotating and non-rotating. A rotating tether will create a controlled force on the end-masses of the system due to centrifugal acceleration. While the tether system rotates, the objects on either end of the tether will experience continuous acceleration; the magnitude of the acceleration depends on the length of the tether and the rotation rate. Momentum exchange occurs when an end body is released during the rotation. The transfer of momentum to the released object will cause the rotating tether to lose energy, and thus lose velocity and altitude. However, using electrodynamic tether thrusting, or ion propulsion the system can then re-boost itself with little or no expenditure of consumable reaction mass.

Skyhook
Main article: Skyhook (structure)
A rotating and a tidally stabilised skyhook in orbit

A skyhook is a theoretical class of orbiting tether propulsion intended to lift payloads to high altitudes and speeds.[14][15][16][17][18] Proposals for skyhooks include designs that employ tethers spinning at hypersonic speed for catching high speed payloads or high altitude aircraft and placing them in orbit.[19]

Electrodynamics
Medium close-up view, captured with a 70 mm camera, shows Tethered Satellite System deployment.
Main article: Electrodynamic tether

Electrodynamic tethers are long conducting wires, such as one deployed from a tether satellite, which can operate on electromagnetic principles as generators, by converting their kinetic energy to electrical energy, or as motors, converting electrical energy to kinetic energy.[1] Electric potential is generated across a conductive tether by its motion through the earth's magnetic field. The choice of the metal conductor to be used in an electrodynamic tether is determined by a variety of factors. Primary factors usually include high electrical conductivity and low density. Secondary factors, depending on the application, include cost, strength, and melting point.

An electrodynamic tether was profiled in the documentary film Orphans of Apollo as technology that was to be used to keep the Russian space station Mir in orbit.[20][21]

Formation flying
Main article: Tethered formation flying

This is the use of a (typically) non-conductive tether to connect multiple spacecraft. A proposed 2011 experiment to study the technique is the Tethered Experiment for Mars inter-Planetary Operations (TEMPO³).

Universal Orbital Support System
Main article: Universal Orbital Support System
Example of a possible layout using the Universal Orbital Support System.

A theoretical type of non-rotating tethered satellite system, it is a concept for providing space-based support to things suspended above an astronomical object.[22] The orbital system is a coupled mass system wherein the upper supporting mass (A) is placed in an orbit around a given celestial body such that it can support a suspended mass (B) at a specific height above the surface of the celestial body, but lower than (A).

Technical difficulties

Gravitational gradient stabilization
Description of the forces contributing towards maintaining a gravity gradient alignment in a tether system
Main article: Gravity-gradient stabilization

Instead of rotating end for end, tethers can also be kept straight by the slight difference in the strength of gravity over their length.

A non-rotating tether system has a stable orientation that is aligned along the local vertical (of the earth or other body). This can be understood by inspection of the figure on the right where two spacecraft at two different altitudes have been connected by a tether. Normally, each spacecraft would have a balance of gravitational (e.g. Fg1) and centrifugal (e.g. Fc1) forces, but when tied together by a tether, these values begin to change with respect to one another. This phenomenon occurs because, without the tether, the higher-altitude mass would travel slower than the lower mass. The system must move at a single speed, so the tether must therefore slow down the lower mass and speed up the upper one. The centrifugal force of the tethered upper body is increased, while that of the lower-altitude body is reduced. This results in the centrifugal force of the upper body and the gravitational force of the lower body being dominant. This difference in forces naturally aligns the system along the local vertical, as seen in the figure.[23]

Atomic oxygen

Objects in low Earth orbit are subjected to noticeable erosion from atomic oxygen due to the high orbital speed with which the molecules strike as well as their high reactivity. This could quickly erode a tether.[24]

Micrometeorites and space junk

Simple single-strand tethers are susceptible to micrometeoroids and space junk. Several systems have since been proposed and tested to improve debris resistance:

  • The US Naval Research Laboratory has successfully flown a long term 6 km long, 2-3mm diameter tether with an outer layer of Spectra 1000 braid and a core of acrylic yarn.[25] This satellite, the Tether Physics and Survivability Experiment (TiPS), was launched in June 1996 and remained in operation over 10 years, finally breaking in July 2006.[26]
  • Dr. Robert P. Hoyt patented an engineered circular net, such that a cut strand's strains would be redistributed automatically around the severed strand. This is called a Hoytether. Hoytethers have theoretical lifetimes of decades.
  • Researchers with JAXA have also proposed net-based tethers for their future missions.[27]

Large pieces of junk would still cut most tethers, including the improved versions listed here, but these are currently tracked on radar and have predictable orbits. A tether could be wiggled to dodge known pieces of junk, or thrusters used to change the orbit, avoiding a collision.

Radiation

Radiation, including UV radiation tend to degrade tether materials, and reduce lifespan. Tethers that repeatedly traverse the Van Allen belts can have markedly lower life than those that stay in low earth orbit or are kept outside Earth's magnetosphere.

Construction

Properties of useful materials
TSS-1R tether composition [NASA].

Tether properties and materials are dependent on the application. However, there are some common properties. To achieve maximum performance and low cost, tethers would need to be made of materials with the combination of high strength or electrical conductivity and low density. All space tethers are susceptible to space debris or micrometeroids. Therefore, system designers will need to decide whether or not a protective coating is needed, including relative to UV and atomic oxygen. Research is being conducted to assess the probability of a collision that would damage the tether.

For applications that exert high tensile forces on the tether, the materials need to be strong and light. Some current tether designs use crystalline plastics such as ultra high molecular weight polyethylene, aramid or carbon fiber. A possible future material would be carbon nanotubes, which have an estimated tensile strength between 140 and 177 GPa (20.3-25.6 million psi), and a proven tensile strength in the range 50-60 GPa for some individual nanotubes. (A number of other materials obtain 10 to 20 GPa in some samples on the nano scale, but translating such strengths to the macro scale has been challenging so far, with, as of 2011, CNT-based ropes being an order of magnitude less strong, not yet stronger than more conventional carbon fiber on that scale).[28][29][30]

For some applications, the tensile force on the tether is projected to be less than 15 lbs (< 65 N)[31] Material selection in this case depends on the purpose of the mission and design constraints. Electrodynamic tethers, such as the one used on TSS-1R, may use thin copper wires for high conductivity (see EDT).

There are design equations for certain applications that may be used to aid designers in identifying typical quantities that drive material selection.

Space elevator equations typically use a "characteristic length", Lc, which is also known as its "self-support length" and is the length of untapered cable it can support in a constant 1 g gravity field.

,

where σ is the stress limit (in pressure units) and ρ is the density of the material.

Hypersonic skyhook equations use the material's "specific velocity" which is equal to the maximum tangential velocity a spinning hoop can attain without breaking:

For rotating tethers (rotovators) the value used is the material's ‘characteristic velocity’ which is the maximum tip velocity a rotating untapered cable can attain without breaking,

The characteristic velocity equals the specific velocity multiplied by the square root of two.

These values are used in equations similar to the rocket equation and are analogous to specific impulse or exhaust velocity. The higher these values are, the more efficient and lighter the tether can be in relation to the payloads that they can carry. Eventually however, the mass of the tether propulsion system will be limited at the low end by other factors such as momentum storage.

Practical materials

Proposed materials include Kevlar, ultra high molecular weight polyethylene, carbon nanotubes and M5 fiber. M5 is a synthetic fiber that is lighter than Kevlar or Spectra.[32] According to Pearson, Levin, Oldson, and Wykes in their article "The Lunar Space Elevator", an M5 ribbon 30 mm wide and 0.023 mm thick, would be able to support 2000 kg on the lunar surface. It would also be able to hold 100 cargo vehicles, each with a mass of 580 kg, evenly spaced along the length of the elevator.[5] Other materials that could be used are T1000G carbon fiber, Spectra 2000, or Zylon.[33]

Potential tether / elevator materials[5]
Material Density
ρ
(kg/m³)		 Stress limit
σ
(GPa)		 Characteristic length
Lc = σ/ρg
(km)		 Specific velocity
Vs = √σ/ρ
(km/s)		 Char. velocity
Vc = √2σ/ρ
(km/s)
Single-wall carbon nanotubes (individual molecules measured) 2266 50 2200 4.7 6.6
Aramid, polybenzoxazole (PBO) fiber ("Zylon")[33] 1340 5.9 450 2.1 3.0
Toray carbon fiber (T1000G) 1810 6.4 360 1.9 2.7
M5 fiber (planned values) 1700 9.5 570 2.4 3.3
M5 fiber (existing) 1700 5.7 340 1.8 2.6
Honeywell extended chain polyethylene fiber (Spectra 2000) 970 3.0 316 1.8 2.5
DuPont Aramid fiber (Kevlar 49) 1440 3.6 255 1.6 2.2
Silicon carbide 3000 5.9 199 1.4 2.0

Shape

Tapering

For gravity stabilised tethers, to exceed the self-support length the tether material can be tapered so that the cross-sectional area varies with the total load at each point along the length of the cable. In practice this means that the central tether structure needs to be thicker than the tips. Correct tapering ensures that the tensile stress at every point in the cable is exactly the same. For very demanding applications, such as an Earth space elevator, the tapering can reduce the excessive ratios of cable weight to payload weight.

Thickness

For rotating tethers not significantly affected by gravity, the thickness also varies, and it can be shown that the area, A, is given as a function of r (the distance from the centre) as follows:[34]

where R is the radius of tether, v is the velocity with respect to the centre, M is the tip mass, is the material density, and T is the design tensile strength (Young's modulus divided by safety factor).

Mass ratio
Graph of tether mass to payload ratio versus the tip speed in multiples of the characteristic speed of the material

Integrating the area to give the volume and multiplying by the density and dividing by the payload mass gives a payload mass / tether mass ratio of:[34]

where erf is the normal probability error function.

Let ,

then:[35]

This equation can be compared with the rocket equation, which is proportional to a simple exponent on a velocity, rather than a velocity squared. This difference effectively limits the delta-v that can be obtained from a single tether.

Redundancy

In addition the cable shape must be constructed to withstand micrometeorites and space junk. This can be achieved with the use of redundant cables, such as the Hoytether; redundancy can ensure that it is very unlikely that multiple redundant cables would be damaged near the same point on the cable, and hence a very large amount of total damage can occur over different parts of the cable before failure occurs.

Material strength

Beanstalks and rotovators are currently limited by the strengths of available materials. Although ultra-high strength plastic fibers (Kevlar and Spectra) permit rotovators to pluck masses from the surface of the Moon and Mars, a rotovator from these materials cannot lift from the surface of the Earth. In theory, high flying, supersonic (or hypersonic) aircraft could deliver a payload to a rotovator that dipped into Earth's upper atmosphere briefly at predictable locations throughout the tropic (and temperate) zone of Earth. As of May 2013, all mechanical tethers (orbital and elevators) are on hold until stronger materials are available.[36]

Cargo capture

Cargo capture for rotovators is nontrivial, and failure to capture can cause problems. Several systems have been proposed, such as shooting nets at the cargo, but all add weight, complexity, and another failure mode. At least one lab scale demonstration of a working grapple system has been achieved however.[37]

Life expectancy

Currently, the strongest materials in tension are plastics that require a coating for protection from UV radiation and (depending on the orbit) erosion by atomic oxygen. Disposal of waste heat is difficult in a vacuum, so overheating may cause tether failures or damage.

Control and modelling

Pendular motion instability

Electrodynamic tethers deployed along the local vertical ('hanging tethers') may suffer from dynamical instability. Pendular motion causes the tether vibration amplitude to build up under the action of electromagnetic interaction. As the mission time increases, this behavior can compromise the performance of the system. Over a few weeks, electrodynamic tethers in Earth orbit might build up vibrations in many modes, as their orbit interacts with irregularities in magnetic and gravitational fields.

One plan to control the vibrations is to actively vary the tether current to counteract the growth of the vibrations. Electrodynamic tethers can be stabilized by reducing their current when it would feed the oscillations, and increasing it when it opposes oscillations. Simulations have demonstrated that this can control tether vibration. This approach requires sensors to measure tether vibrations, which can either be an inertial navigation system on one end of the tether, or satellite navigation systems mounted on the tether, transmitting their positions to a receiver on the end.

Another proposed method is to use spinning electrodynamic tethers instead of hanging tethers. The gyroscopic effect provides passive stabilisation, avoiding the instability.

Surges

As mentioned earlier, conductive tethers have failed from unexpected current surges. Unexpected electrostatic discharges have cut tethers (e.g. see Tethered Satellite System Reflight (TSS‑1R) on STS‑75), damaged electronics, and welded tether handling machinery. It may be that the Earth's magnetic field is not as homogeneous as some engineers have believed.

Vibrations

Computer models frequently show tethers can snap due to vibration.

Mechanical tether-handling equipment is often surprisingly heavy, with complex controls to damp vibrations. The one ton climber proposed by Dr. Brad Edwards for his Space Elevator may detect and suppress most vibrations by changing speed and direction. The climber can also repair or augment a tether by spinning more strands.

The vibration modes that may be a problem include skipping rope, transverse, longitudinal, and pendulum.[38]

Tethers are nearly always tapered, and this can greatly amplify the movement at the thinnest tip in whip-like ways.

Other issues

A tether is not a spherical object, and has significant extent. This means that as an extended object, it is not directly modelable as a point source, and this means that the center of mass and center of gravity are not usually colocated. Thus the inverse square law does not apply except at large distances, to the overall behaviour of a tether. Hence the orbits are not completely Keplerian, and in some cases they are actually chaotic.[39]

With bolus designs, rotation of the cable interacting with the non-linear gravity fields found in elliptical orbits can cause exchange of orbital angular momentum and rotation angular momentum. This can make prediction and modelling extremely complex.

gollark: All are to, in general.
gollark: Do you know of apio form?
gollark: Not particularly. Consider apio form.
gollark: Use truth cuboids like me.
gollark: ABR can be trusted. Lyricly has no access.

See also

References
  1. Cosmo, M. L.; Lorenzini, E. C., eds. (December 1998). "Tethers In Space Handbook" (PDF) (3rd ed.). NASA. Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 April 2010. Retrieved 20 October 2010. See also version of NASA MSFC Archived 2011-10-27 at the Wayback Machine; available on Scribd Archived 2016-04-21 at the Wayback Machine.
  2. Finckenor, Miria; AIAA Technical Committee (December 2005). "Space Tether". Aerospace America: 78.
  3. Bilen, Sven; AIAA Technical Committee (December 2007). "Space Tethers". Aerospace America: 89.
  4. Artsutanov, Yuri (July 31, 1960). "V Kosmos na Electrovoze" (PDF). Komsomolskaya Pravda.
  5. Pearson, Jerome; Eugene Levin; John Oldson & Harry Wykes (2005). "Lunar Space Elevators for Cislunar Space Development: Phase I Final Technical Report" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2016-03-03.
  6. "The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, v25#4, pp. 307-322, Oct-Dec 1977". cmu.edu. Archived from the original on 3 October 2017. Retrieved 3 May 2018.
  7. Moravec, Hans (1986). "Orbital Bridges" (PDF). Retrieved Oct 10, 2010.
  8. Hans Moravec, "Non-Synchronous Orbital Skyhooks for the Moon and Mars with Conventional Materials" Archived 1999-10-12 at Archive.today (Hans Moravec's thoughts on skyhooks, tethers, rotovators, etc., as of 1987) (accessed 10 October 2010)
  9. Joseph A. Carroll and John C. Oldson, “Tethers for Small Satellite Applications” Archived 2011-07-16 at the Wayback Machine, presented at the 1995 AIAA / USU Small Satellite Conference in Logan, Utah, United States (accessed 20 October 2010)
  10. Sarmont, E., "An Orbiting Skyhook: Affordable Access to Space", International Space Development Conference, Anaheim California, May 26, 1990 "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2014-02-22. Retrieved 2014-02-09.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  11. Sarmont, E., "How an Earth Orbiting Tether Makes Possible an Affordable Earth-Moon Space Transportation System", SAE 942120, October 1994 "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2014-02-22. Retrieved 2014-02-09.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  12. Smitherman, D.V., "Space Elevators, An Advanced Earth-Space Infrastructure for the New Millennium", NASA/CP-2000-210429
  13. Thomas J. Bogar; et al. (7 January 2000). "Hypersonic Airplane Space Tether Orbital Launch System: Phase I Final Report" (PDF). NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts. Research Grant No. 07600-018. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 July 2011.
  14. H. Moravec, "A non-synchronous orbital skyhook". Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 307–322, 1977.
  15. G. Colombo, E. M. Gaposchkin, M. D. Grossi, and G. C. Weiffenbach, “The sky-hook: a shuttle-borne tool for low-orbital-altitude research,” Meccanica, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 3–20, 1975.
  16. .M. L. Cosmo and E. C. Lorenzini, Tethers in Space Handbook, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Ala, USA, 3rd edition, 1997.
  17. .L. Johnson, B. Gilchrist, R. D. Estes, and E. Lorenzini, "Overview of future NASA tether applications," Advances in Space Research, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 1055–1063, 1999.
  18. E. M. Levin, "Dynamic Analysis of Space Tether Missions", American Astronautical Society, Washington, DC, USA, 2007.
  19. Hypersonic Airplane Space Tether Orbital Launch (HASTOL) System: Interim Study Results Archived 2016-04-27 at the Wayback Machine
  20. "Orphans of Apollo". World Press. Archived from the original on 21 June 2012. Retrieved 30 January 2013.
  21. Foust, Jeff (July 23, 2001). "Preview: Orphans of Apollo". The Space Review. Archived from the original on 5 February 2013. Retrieved 30 January 2013.
  22. Wood, Charlie (29 March 2017). "A 20-mile long 'spacescraper' dangling from an asteroid: Could it work?". Christian Science Monitor. Archived from the original on 31 March 2017.
  23. Cosmo, M. L., Lorenzini, E. C., "Tethers in Space Handbook", NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, 1997, pp. 274-1-274
  24. Michel van Pelt (2009). Space Tethers and Space Elevators. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 163. ISBN 978-0-387-76556-3.
  25. "TiPS: Missuion Objectives". Archived from the original on July 8, 2007. Retrieved 2011-10-06.CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown (link)
  26. NOSS Launch Data Archived 2011-09-28 at the Wayback Machine (see NOSS 2-3, which deployed TiPS)
  27. Ohkawa, Y.; Kawamoto, S.; Nishida, S. I.; Kitamura, S. (2009). "Research and Development of Electrodynamic Tethers for Space Debris Mitigation". Transactions of the Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, Space Technology Japan. 7: Tr_T2_5 – Tr_2_10. Bibcode:2009TrSpT...7Tr2.5O. doi:10.2322/tstj.7.Tr_2_5.
  28. "Nanotube Fibers". science-wired.blogspot.com. Archived from the original on 1 February 2016. Retrieved 3 May 2018.
  29. Tensile tests of ropes of very long aligned multiwall carbon nanotubes Archived 2011-07-22 at the Wayback Machine
  30. Tensile Loading of Ropes of Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes and their Mechanical Properties
  31. NASA, TSS-1R Mission Failure Investigation Board, Final Report, May 31, 1996 (accessed 7 April 2011)
  32. Bacon 2005
  33. Specifications for commercially available PBO (Zylon) cable: "PBO (Zylon) The high performance fibre" Archived 2010-11-15 at the Wayback Machine (accessed Oct. 20, 2010)
  34. "Tether Transport from LEO to the Lunar Surface", R. L. Forward, AIAA Paper 91-2322, 27th Joint Propulsion Conference, 1991 Archived 2011-05-17 at the Wayback Machine
  35. Non-Synchronous Orbital Skyhooks for the Moon and Mars with Conventional Materials - Hans Moravec
  36. Jillian Scharr, "Space Elevators On Hold At Least Until Stronger Materials Are Available, Experts Say", Huffington Post, May 29, 2013 "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2014-03-02. Retrieved 2014-04-06.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  37. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2010-11-26. Retrieved 2011-03-26.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) NASA Engineers, Tennessee College Students Successfully Demonstrate Catch Mechanism for Future Space Tether
  38. Tether dynamics Archived 2007-07-17 at the Wayback Machine
  39. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2017-10-04. Retrieved 2017-11-01.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) Ultra Long Orbital WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on MATHEMATICS: Tethers Behave Highly Non-Keplerian and Unstable- Daniele Mortari

Text

Video
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.