Electric organ (biology)

In biology, the electric organ is an organ common to all electric fish used for the purposes of creating an electric field. The electric organ is derived from modified nerve or muscle tissue.[1] The electric discharge from this organ is used for navigation, communication, mating, defense and also sometimes for the incapacitation of prey.[2][3]

An electric ray (Torpediniformes) showing location of electric organ and electrocytes stacked within it

Research history

In the 1770s the electric organs of the torpedo and electric eel were the subject of Royal Society papers by Hunter, Walsh and Williamson. They appear to have influenced the thinking of Luigi Galvani and Alessandro Volta - the founders of electrophysiology and electrochemistry.[4]

In the 19th century, Charles Darwin discussed the electric organ in his Origin of Species as a likely example of convergent evolution: "But if the electric organs had been inherited from one ancient progenitor thus provided, we might have expected that all electric fishes would have been specially related to each other…I am inclined to believe that in nearly the same way as two men have sometimes independently hit on the very same invention, so natural selection, working for the good of each being and taking advantage of analogous variations, has sometimes modified in very nearly the same manner two parts in two organic beings".[5]

Since the 20th Century, electric organs have received extensive study, for example Hans Lissmann's pioneering 1951 paper[6] and his review of their function and evolution in 1958.[7] More recently, Torpedo californica electrocytes were used in the first sequencing of the acetylcholine receptor by Noda and colleagues in 1982, while Electrophorus electrocytes served in the first sequencing of the voltage-gated sodium channel by Noda and colleagues in 1984.[8]

Evolution

Electric organs have evolved at least six times in various teleost and elasmobranch fish.[9][10][11][12] Notably, they have convergently evolved in the African Mormyridae and South American Gymnotidae groups of electric fish. The two groups are distantly related, as they shared a common ancestor before the supercontinent Gondwana split into the American and African continents, leading to the divergence of the two groups. A whole-genome duplication event in the teleost lineage allowed for the neofunctionalization of the voltage-gated sodium channel gene Scn4aa which produces electric discharges.[13][14]

In all clades except Apteronotus (Latin America), where the cells are derived from neural tissue, the electrocytes are derived from skeletal muscle.[8]

Electrocytes
Electrocytes discharging

Electrocytes, electroplaques or electroplaxes are cells used by electric eels, rays, and other fish for electrogenesis.[8] In some species they are cigar-shaped; in others, they are flat disk-like cells.[8] Electric eels have several thousand of these cells stacked, each producing 0.15 V. The cells function by pumping positive sodium and potassium ions out of the cell via transport proteins powered by adenosine triphosphate (ATP). Postsynaptically, electrocytes work much like muscle cells. They have nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.

The stack of electrocytes has long been compared to a voltaic pile, and may even have inspired the invention of the battery, since the analogy was already noted by Alessandro Volta.[4] While the electric organ is structurally similar to a battery, its cycle of operation is more like a Marx generator, in that the individual elements are slowly charged in parallel, then suddenly and nearly simultaneously discharged in series to produce a high voltage pulse.

Firing

To discharge the electrocytes at the correct time, the electric eel uses its pacemaker nucleus, a nucleus of pacemaker neurons. When an electric eel spots its prey, the pacemaker neurons fire and acetylcholine is subsequently released from electromotor neurons to the electrocytes. The electrocytes fire an action potential using the voltage-gated sodium channels on one or both sides of the electrocyte, depending on the complexity of the electric organ in that species. If the electrocyte has sodium channels on both sides, the depolarization caused by firing action potentials on one side of the electrocyte can cause the sodium channels on the other side of the electrocyte to fire as well.[15]

Location

In most fishes, electric organs are oriented to fire along the length of the body, usually lying along the length of the tail and within the fish's musculature, with smaller accessory electric organs in the head. However, there are some exceptions; in stargazers and in rays the electric organs are oriented along the dorso-ventral (up-down) axis. In the electric torpedo ray, the organ is near the pectoral muscles and the gills (see the image). The stargazer's electric organs lie between the mouth and the eye. In the electric catfish, the organs are located just below the skin and encase most of the body like a sheath.

Electric organ discharge

Electric organ discharge is the electric field generated by the organs of animals including electric fish. In some cases the electric discharge is strong and is used for protection from predators; in other cases it is weak and it is used for navigation and communication.[16] Communicating through electric organ discharges occurs when a fish uses its own electroreceptors to sense the electric signals of a nearby fish.[17] Electric fish navigate by detecting distortions in their electrical field by using their cutaneous electroreceptors.[18][19][20] Electric organ discharges influence mate choice in weakly electric fish, as females have been shown to be attracted to electric discharge characteristics of conspecific males.[3]

gollark: RTGs? Nuclear reactors?
gollark: Generator? You're using fuel cells?
gollark: It's not overengineered unless it can probably travel to the next solar system if uou get your maneuver node wrong.
gollark: yes.
gollark: 0/10 overengineering, there's no fusion drive or 16-kerbal crew module.

See also

References
  1. Kramer, Bernd (1996). "Electroreception and communication in fishes" (PDF). Progress in Zoology. 42.
  2. Castello, M. E., A. Rodriguez-Cattaneo, P. A. Aguilera, L. Iribarne, A. C. Pereira, and A. A. Caputi (2009). "Waveform generation in the weakly electric fish Gymnotus coropinae (Hoedeman): the electric organ and the electric organ discharge". Journal of Experimental Biology. 212 (9): 1351–1364. doi:10.1242/jeb.022566. PMID 19376956.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  3. Feulner, P. G., M. Plath, J. Engelmann, F. Kirschbaum, R. Tiedemann (2009). "Electrifying love: electric fish use species-specific discharge for mate recognition". Biology Letters. 5: 225–228. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2008.0566. PMC 2665802. PMID 19033131.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  4. Mauro Alexander. "The role of the voltaic pile in the Galvani-Volta controversy concerning animal vs. metallic electricity" (PDF). Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences. XXIV: 140. doi:10.1093/jhmas/xxiv.2.140.
  5. Darwin, Charles (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray. ISBN 978-1-4353-9386-8.
  6. Lissmann, Hans W. (1951). "CONTINUOUS ELECTRICAL SIGNALS FROM THE TAIL OF A FISH, GYMNARCHUS-NILOTICUS CUV". Nature. 167 (4240): 201–202. doi:10.1038/167201a0. PMID 14806425.
  7. Lissmann, Hans W. (1958). "ON THE FUNCTION AND EVOLUTION OF ELECTRIC ORGANS IN FISH". Journal of Experimental Biology. 35: 156ff.
  8. Markham, M. R. (2013). "Electrocyte physiology: 50 years later". Journal of Experimental Biology. 216 (13): 2451–2458. doi:10.1242/jeb.082628. ISSN 0022-0949.
  9. Zakon, H. H., D. J. Zwickl, Y. Lu, and D. M. Hillis (2008). "Molecular evolution of communication signals in electric fish". Journal of Experimental Biology. 211 (11): 1814–1818. doi:10.1242/jeb.015982. PMID 18490397.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  10. Lavoue, S., R. Bigorne, G. Lecointre, and J. F. Agnese (2000). "Phylogenetic relationships of mormyrid electric fishes (Mormyridae; Teleostei) inferred from cytochrome b sequences". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 14 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1006/mpev.1999.0687. PMID 10631038.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  11. Lavoué S., Miya M., Arnegard M. E., Sullivan J. P., Hopkins C. D., Nishida M. (2012). "Comparable ages for the independent origins of electrogenesis in African and South American weakly electric fishes". PLoS ONE. 7 (5): e36287. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036287. PMC 3351409. PMID 22606250.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  12. Kawasaki, M. (2009). "Evolution of Time-Coding Systems in Weakly Electric Fishes". Zoological Science. 26 (9): 587–599. doi:10.2108/zsj.26.587. PMID 19799509.
  13. Gallant, J. R., L. L. Traeger, J. D. Volkening, H. Moffett, P. H. Chen, C. D. Novina, G. N. Phillips; et al. (2014). "Genomic basis for the convergent evolution of electric organs". Science. 344: 1522–1525. doi:10.1126/science.1254432. PMC 5541775. PMID 24970089.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  14. Arnegard, M. E., D. J. Zwickl, Y. Lu, H. H. Zakon (2010). "Old gene duplication facilitates origin and diversification of an innovative communication system-twice". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 107. doi:10.1073/pnas.1011803107.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  15. Salazar, V. L., R. Krahe, J. E. Lewis (2013). "The energetics of electric organ discharge generation in gymnotiform weakly electric fish". Journal of Experimental Biology. 216: 2459–2468. doi:10.1242/jeb.082735.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  16. Caputi, A. A., B. A. Carlson, and O. Macadar. 2005. Electric organs and their control. Pages 410-451 in T. H. Bullock, C. D. Hopkins, A. N. Popper, and R. R. Fay, eds. Electroreception. New York.
  17. Crampton W. G. R., Davis J. K., Lovejoy N. R., Pensky M. (2008). "Multivariate classification of animal communication signals: A simulation-based comparison of alternative signal processing procedures using electric fishes". Journal of Physiology-Paris. 102 (4–6): 304–321. doi:10.1016/j.jphysparis.2008.10.001. PMID 18984042.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  18. Bastian J. 1986. Electrolocation: behavior, anatomy, and physiology. Pages 577-612 in T. H. Bullock and W. Heiligenberg, eds. Electroreception. New York.
  19. Aguilera P. A., Caputi A. A. (2003). "Electroreception in G. carapo: detection of changes in waveform of the electrosensory signals". Journal of Experimental Biology. 206 (6): 989–998. doi:10.1242/jeb.00198.
  20. Pereira, A. C.; A. A. Caputi (2010). "Imaging in Electrosensory Systems". Interdisciplinary Sciences-Computational Life Sciences. 2: 291–307. doi:10.1007/s12539-010-0049-2.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.