EF English Proficiency Index
The EF English Proficiency Index (EF EPI) attempts to rank countries by the average level of English language skills amongst those adults who took the EF test.[1] It is the product of EF Education First, an international education company, and draws its conclusions from data collected via English tests available for free over the internet.[2][3] The index is an online survey first published in 2011[4] based on test data from 1.7 million test takers.[5] The most recent, ninth edition was released in October 2019.[6][7]
Methodology
The EF EPI eighth edition was calculated using test data from 1.3 million test takers in 2017. The test takers were self-selected and no demographic information was collected on them. The tests are used by the company for marketing and placement purposes. 85 countries and 3 territories appear in the eighth edition of the index. In order to be included, a country was required to have at least 400 test takers.[8]
Report
The report is composed of a country ranking table, several pages of analysis with graphs correlating other economic and social factors with English proficiency, and analysis of each region or continent. The 2018 report and accompanying country fact sheets include English proficiency levels by gender, age group, and region, within countries, and some English proficiency scores by city. The website displays portions of the report and has analysis of English skills in many countries and territories.[8]
Primary conclusions
- Exports per capita, Gross National Income per capita and innovation all correlate positively with English proficiency.[9]
- English proficiency levels are evolving at different rates in different countries around the world, including a few countries with declining English skills.[10]
- Europe as a whole speaks the best English, while the Middle East is the worst.[11]
- Women speak English better than men.[12]
2019 rankings
Below are the latest country scores, proficiency bands, and rankings as published in 2019.[13]
2019 Rank | Country | 2019 Score | 2019 Proficiency Band |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 70.27 | Very High Proficiency | |
2 | 68.74 | Very High Proficiency | |
3 | 67.93 | Very High Proficiency | |
4 | 67.87 | Very High Proficiency | |
5 | 66.82 | Very High Proficiency | |
6 | 65.38 | Very High Proficiency | |
7 | 65.34 | Very High Proficiency | |
8 | 64.11 | Very High Proficiency | |
9 | 64.03 | Very High Proficiency | |
10 | 63.77 | Very High Proficiency | |
11 | 63.76 | Very High Proficiency | |
12 | 63.14 | Very High Proficiency | |
13 | 63.09 | Very High Proficiency | |
14 | 63.07 | Very High Proficiency | |
15 | 61.86 | High Proficiency | |
16 | 61.36 | High Proficiency | |
17 | 61.30 | High Proficiency | |
18 | 60.51 | High Proficiency | |
19 | 60.23 | High Proficiency | |
20 | 60.14 | High Proficiency | |
21 | 60.11 | High Proficiency | |
22 | 59.87 | High Proficiency | |
23 | 59.30 | High Proficiency | |
24 | 58.97 | High Proficiency | |
25 | 58.82 | High Proficiency | |
26 | 58.55 | High Proficiency | |
27 | 58.38 | High Proficiency | |
28 | 58.29 | High Proficiency | |
29 | 58.26 | High Proficiency | |
30 | 57.38 | Moderate Proficiency | |
31 | 57.25 | Moderate Proficiency | |
32 | 56.85 | Moderate Proficiency | |
33 | 55.63 | Moderate Proficiency | |
34 | 55.49 | Moderate Proficiency | |
35 | 55.46 | Moderate Proficiency | |
36 | 55.31 | Moderate Proficiency | |
37 | 55.04 | Moderate Proficiency | |
38 | 54.18 | Moderate Proficiency | |
39 | 54.08 | Moderate Proficiency | |
40 | 53.44 | Moderate Proficiency | |
41 | 53.34 | Moderate Proficiency | |
42 | 52.89 | Moderate Proficiency | |
43 | 52.70 | Moderate Proficiency | |
44 | 52.58 | Moderate Proficiency | |
45 | 52.51 | Moderate Proficiency | |
46 | 52.50 | Moderate Proficiency | |
47 | 52.39 | Low Proficiency | |
48 | 52.14 | Low Proficiency | |
49 | 52.13 | Low Proficiency | |
50 | 51.99 | Low Proficiency | |
51 | 51.64 | Low Proficiency | |
52 | 51.57 | Low Proficiency | |
53 | 51.51 | Low Proficiency | |
54 | 51.41 | Low Proficiency | |
55 | 50.92 | Low Proficiency | |
56 | 50.62 | Low Proficiency | |
57 | 50.53 | Low Proficiency | |
58 | 50.22 | Low Proficiency | |
59 | 50.10 | Low Proficiency | |
60 | 50.09 | Low Proficiency | |
61 | 50.06 | Low Proficiency | |
62 | 49.89 | Low Proficiency | |
63 | 49.64 | Low Proficiency | |
64 | 49.60 | Low Proficiency | |
65 | 49.04 | Low Proficiency | |
66 | 49.00 | Low Proficiency | |
67 | 48.99 | Low Proficiency | |
68 | 48.75 | Low Proficiency | |
69 | 48.69 | Low Proficiency | |
70 | 48.19 | Very Low Proficiency | |
71 | 48.11 | Very Low Proficiency | |
72 | 48.02 | Very Low Proficiency | |
73 | 47.81 | Very Low Proficiency | |
74 | 47.61 | Very Low Proficiency | |
75 | 47.21 | Very Low Proficiency | |
76 | 47.19 | Very Low Proficiency | |
77 | 47.11 | Very Low Proficiency | |
78 | 47.10 | Very Low Proficiency | |
79 | 46.81 | Very Low Proficiency | |
80 | 46.79 | Very Low Proficiency | |
81 | 46.57 | Very Low Proficiency | |
82 | 46.36 | Very Low Proficiency | |
83 | 46.28 | Very Low Proficiency | |
84 | 46.22 | Very Low Proficiency | |
85 | 46.13 | Very Low Proficiency | |
86 | 46.00 | Very Low Proficiency | |
87 | 45.94 | Very Low Proficiency | |
88 | 45.56 | Very Low Proficiency | |
89 | 45.36 | Very Low Proficiency | |
90 | 45.28 | Very Low Proficiency | |
91 | 44.54 | Very Low Proficiency | |
92 | 44.39 | Very Low Proficiency | |
93 | 43.83 | Very Low Proficiency | |
94 | 43.78 | Very Low Proficiency | |
95 | 43.18 | Very Low Proficiency | |
96 | 42.41 | Very Low Proficiency | |
97 | 42.39 | Very Low Proficiency | |
98 | 41.60 | Very Low Proficiency | |
99 | 41.51 | Very Low Proficiency | |
100 | 40.87 | Very Low Proficiency |
Similar reports
The European Commission performed a language survey, SurveyLang, which tested a representative sample of 15-year-old European students on their foreign language skills. The report and data sets were released for 13 European countries in June 2012.[14]
References
- English: Who speaks English?. The Economist. Retrieved on 2011-05-29.
- Study Offers Snapshot of Global English-Language-Learner Trends. Education Week. Retrieved on 2017-01-17.
- The EF SET powers the EF EPI. EF SET. Retrieved on 2017-10-05.
- The EF EPI. ef.com. Retrieved on 2017-10-05.
- Low English Levels Can Hurt Countries' Progress. New York Times. Retrieved on 2017-01-17.
- https://www.ef.com/__/~/media/centralefcom/epi/downloads/full-reports/v9/ef-epi-2019-english.pdf
- Women and managers are better at speaking English, study on proficiency finds. Business Insider. Retrieved on 2018-11-09
- EF English Proficiency Index – Comparing English skills between countries – EF EPI. Ef.com. Retrieved on 2018-11-09.
- Minh Tran: Countries with High English Proficiency Are More Innovative. Harvard Business Review. "Minh Tran is Director of Research and Partnerships for EF Education First and a member of the team that launched the EF Standard English Test." Retrieved on 2017-01-17.
- How Well Does Your Country Speak English?. Voice of America. Retrieved on 2017-1-17.
- Which countries are best at English as a second language?. World Economic Forum. Retrieved on 2017-1-17.
- Women are better than men at learning English. That’s not necessarily a good sign.. Washington Post. Retrieved on 2017-1-17.
- "EF EPI 2019 - EF English Proficiency Index". 2019.
- SurveyLang project. European Commission. Retrieved on 2012-09-20.