Complete topological vector space

In functional analysis and related areas of mathematics, a topological vector spaces (TVS) is complete if its canonical uniformity is complete.

A Metrizable topological vector space X with a translation invariant metric d is complete as a TVS if and only if (X, d) is a complete metric space. All topological vector spaces, even those that are not metrizable or Haussddorff, have a completion.

Definitions and notation

Throughout, X will be a non-empty set and 𝒜 and will be collections of subsets of X.

The theory of filters and filter bases is well developed and has many definitions and notations, many of which we now unceremoniously list to prevent this article from becoming prolix and to allow for the easy look up of notation and definitions. We describe many of their important properties later. Note that not all notation related to filters is well established and some notation varies greatly across the literature (e.g. the notation for the set of all filter bases on a set) so in such cases this article uses whatever notation is most self describing or easily remembered.

NotationDefinitionName
℘(X) := { S : SX} Set of all subsets of X Power set of a set X[1]
Top(X) Set of all topologies on X
Filters(X) Set of all filters on X
PreFilters(X) = FilterBases(X) Set of all filter bases on X
Func(X; Y) Set of all functions from X into Y
Sets operations
Definition:[2] The upward closure or isotonization of a collection of subsets of X is
:=X := { SX : BS for some B ∈ ℬ} = B ∈ ℬ { S : BSX}.
Notation and DefinitionAssumptionsName
ker ℬ := B ∈ ℬ B Kernel[1]
ℬ ∩ { S } := { BS : B ∈ ℬ} SX Trace of on S[3]
S ∖ ℬ := { SB : B ∈ ℬ} SX Set subtraction[3]
:=X = B ∈ ℬ { S : SB} SX Downward closure[1]
𝒜 + ℬ := { A + B : A ∈ 𝒜, B ∈ ℬ} X is an additive group Sum[3]
s:= { s B : B ∈ ℬ} X is a vector space and s is a scalar Scalar multiple[3]
f (ℬ) := { f (B) : B ∈ ℬ} f : XY is a map Image of under f[4]
f-1 (𝒞) := { f-1 (C) : C ∈ 𝒞} f : XY is a map and 𝒞 ⊆ ℘(Y) Preimage of under f[4]
Im f := f (X) = { f (x) : xX} f : XY is a map Image or range of f
SX := { S }X SX Upward closure/Isotonization[1]
𝒜 ⊓ ℬ := 𝒜 ∩ ℬ := { AB : A ∈ 𝒜, B ∈ ℬ} Pairwise intersection[3]

Nets and topologies

Directed sets and nets notation.
Definition:[5] A directed set is a set I together with a preorder, which we will assume is denoted by (unless otherwise specified), that makes (I, ≤) into an upward directed set, which means that for every i, jI, there exists some kI such that ik and jk. We define ji to mean ij. A net in X is a map from a directed set into X.
Notation and DefinitionAssumptionsName
Ii := { jI : ij} iI and (I, ≤) is a directed set Tail of I starting at i
I> i := { jI : ij, ji} iI and (I, ≤) is a directed set Tail of I after i
f (Ii) = { f (j) : ij, jI} iI and f : (I, ≤) → X is a net Tail of f starting at i[6]
f (I> i) = { f (j) : ij, ji, jI} iI and f : (I, ≤) → X is a net Tail of f after i
(x)i := xi := { xj : ij, jI} iI and x = (xi)iI is a net Tail of x starting at i
x> i := { xj : ij, ji, jI} iI and x = (xi)iI is a net Tail of x after i
Tails(x) := (xi)
i
:= x := { xi : iI
}
x = (xi)iI is a net Set/(Eventuality) filter base of/associated with/generated by (tails of) x. If x is a sequence it is called the sequential filter base instead.[6]
TailsFilter(x) := Tails(x)X x = (xi)iI is a net (Eventuality) filter of/associated with/generated by (tails of) x[6]


Topology notation

If τ is a topology on X then we may use the following notation.

Notation and DefinitionAssumptionsName
τ (S) := { Oτ : SO} SX (Filter base of) Open neighborhoods of S in (X, τ)
τ (x) := { Oτ : xO} xX (Filter base of) Open neighborhoods of x in (X, τ)
𝒩τ(S) := 𝒩(S) := τ (S)X SX (Filter of) Neighborhoods of S in (X, τ)
𝒩τ(x) :=𝒩(x) := τ (x)X xX (Filter of) Neighborhoods of x in (X, τ)
𝒩τ : X → Filter(X)    is the map    x ↦ 𝒩τ(x) Map of neighborhood filters (induced by τ) from X

Finer, coarser, subordinate

The following definition allows for the filter equivalent of "subsequences."[7]

  1. 𝒜 ≤ ℬ or ℬ ⊢ 𝒜, stated as is finer than 𝒜, 𝒜 is coarser than , or is subordinate to 𝒜:[8] If every A ∈ 𝒜 contains some B ∈ ℬ. That is, if for every A ∈ 𝒜, there is some B ∈ ℬ such that BA.
      If 𝒜 ⊆ ℬ then 𝒜 ≤ ℬ. Thus ℬ ≤ ℘(X) is always true, for any ℬ ⊆ ℘(X).
    • 𝒜 ≤ ℬ if and only if 𝒜 ⊆ ℬX.
    • If is upward closed (i.e. isotone), then 𝒜 ≤ ℬ if and only if 𝒜 ⊆ ℬ.[2]

The relation is not antisymmetric; that is, 𝒜 ≤ ℬ and ℬ ≤ 𝒜 does not necessarily imply ℬ = 𝒜; not even if both 𝒜 and are filter bases.[8] However, is transitive and reflexive so we may define an equivalence relation.

  1. 𝒜 is equivalent to : If 𝒜 ≤ ℬ and ℬ ≤ 𝒜.
    • Two families of sets 𝒜 and are equivalent if and only if their upward closures are equal.[2]
  2. 𝒜 ◅ ℬ or ℬ ▻ 𝒜 stated as 𝒜 is a refinement of , 𝒜 refines : If every A ∈ 𝒜 is contained in some B ∈ ℬ. That is, if for every A ∈ 𝒜, there is some B ∈ ℬ such that AB.
    • 𝒜 ◅ ℬ if and only if (X ∖ 𝒜) ≤ (X ∖ ℬ).[2]
  3. 𝒜 # ℬ, stated as 𝒜 and mesh:[3] if AB ≠ ∅ for all A ∈ 𝒜 and B ∈ ℬ.
    • If SX then we write S # ℬ to mean { S } # ℬ.
  4. 𝒜 and are dissociated:[3] if 𝒜 and do not mesh.

Filters and filter bases

We now define properties that a collection ℬ ⊆ ℘(X) may have.

Definitions: We say that is/has the:
  1. Proper: ∅ ∉ ℬ.
  2. Degenerate: ∅ ∈ ℬ.
  3. Closed under (finite) intersections: If B, C ∈ ℬ then BC ∈ ℬ.
  4. Directed by (superset/reverse) inclusion:[5] If B, C ∈ ℬ then there exists some A ∈ ℬ such that ABC.
    • Equivalently, is a directed set when we define BA if and only if AB for all subsets A and B of X.
  5. Finite intersection property and is centralized:[9] The intersection of any finite collection of sets in is not empty. That is, if B1, ..., Bn ∈ ℬ then ∅ ≠ B1 ∩ ⋅⋅⋅ ∩ Bn.
  6. Upward closed/Isotone[2]: If ℬ = ℬX, or equivalently, if whenever B ∈ ℬ and C is a set such that BCX then C ∈ ℬ.
    • X is the a unique smallest isotone collection of subsets of X, in which case we may say that X is generated by .
  7. Ultra: For any SX there exists some B ∈ ℬ such that SB or SXB.

We now define special categories of collections ℬ ⊆ ℘(X).

Definitions: We say that is/is a(n):
  1. Dual ideal:[10] If ℬ ≠ ∅ is closed under (finite) intersections and upward closed.
  2. Filter:[3] if ℬ ≠ ∅[10] is proper, closed under (finite) intersections, and upward closed. Equivalently, a filter is a proper dual ideal.
    • The intersection of any non-empty set 𝔽 of filters on X is a filter on X, called the infimum or greatest lower bound of 𝔽. In contrast, the least upper bound of a family of filters may fail to be a filter.
  3. Filter base[3]/Prefilter: if ℬ ≠ ∅ is proper and directed by superset inclusion.
    • If is a filter base then the upward closure X is the unique filter containing called the filter generated by . We say that a filter is generated by a filter base if ℱ = ℬX, in which case we say that is a filter base for .
  4. Filter subbase:[3] if ℬ ≠ ∅ has the finite intersection property (which implies that is proper).
    • The collection of all finite intersections of subsets of a filter subbase is a filter base called the filter base generated by [3] and the filter generated by this filter base is called the filter generated by the filter subbase .
  5. Ultrafilter: if is ultra and a filter.
    • Every filter is equal to the intersection of all ultrafilters containing it.
  6. Free:[1] ker ℬ = ∅.
    • Every non-principal ultrafilter is free.
  7. Principal:[1] ker ℬ ∈ ℬ.
    • Every filter on a finite set is principal as is every cofinite filter on an infinite set.[1]
  8. Discrete/Principal at xX:[11] { x } = ker ℬ ∈ ℬ.
  9. Indiscrete:[11] ℬ = { X}
  10. Additive:[12] For every B ∈ ℬ, there exists some U ∈ ℬ such that U + UB (this assumes that X is a group).
    • If is a filter then this happens if and only if ℬ ⊆ ℬ + ℬ.[12]
  11. Maximal:[3][13] For any filter base 𝒟 on X, if ℬ ≤ 𝒟 then 𝒟 ≤ ℬ. That is, if has no properly subordinate filter base.
    • A filter base on X is maximal if and only if for any SX, either there exists some B ∈ ℬ such that BS or else there exists some B ∈ ℬ such that XBS.[3]
    • It may be shown using Zorn's lemma that given any filter base, there is a maximal filter base subordinate to it.[3]

Properties

Images and preimages of filter bases
  • If is a filter base on X then f (ℬ) is a filter base on Y, f-1 (f (ℬ)) is a filter base on X, and moreover, f-1 (f (ℬ)) ≤ ℬ.[4]
  • If is a filter on X then f (ℬ) is a filter base on Y, f (ℬ)Y := { SY : f-1 (S) ∈ ℬ}, and f (ℬ) is a filter on Y if and only if f is surjective.[14]
  • If is an ultrafilter on X and f is surjective then f (ℬ) is an ultrafilter on Y.[15]
  • If f is a bijection then is a filter base (resp. filter, ultrafilter) on X if and only if the same is true of f (ℬ) on Y.[15]
  • If 𝒞 is a filter base on Y then f-1 (𝒞) is a filter base on X if and only if ∅ ∉ f-1 (𝒞), in which case 𝒞 ≤ f (f-1 (𝒞)).[4]
  • If 𝒞 is a filter on Y then f-1 (𝒞) is a filter base on X but it may fail to be a filter on X even if f is surjective.[15]


Examples of filter bases and filters
  • If is a filter base then the trace of on S is a filter base if BS ≠ ∅ for all B ∈ ℬ.
  • If 𝒜 ≤ ℬ and is a filter base then 𝒜 and mesh[10] (see footnote for proof).[16]

Filter bases on topological spaces

Definition:[3] Say that a point xX is a cluster point of a collection of subsets of X if BN ≠ ∅ for every B ∈ ℬ and every neighborhood N of x in X. We denote the set of all cluster points of by cl ℬ.

Note that the set of all cluster points of a filter base cl ℬ in a topological space X is a closed subset of X and that moreover, cl ℬ = { cl B : B ∈ ℬ}.[3]

Note that if 𝒜 and are filters on X then 𝒜 < ℬ if and only if ℬ ⊆ 𝒜.

Definition:[3] Say that a collection of subsets of X converges to a point xX, that x is a limit of in X, and write ℬ → x in X if 𝒩(x) < ℬ. That is, if every neighborhood N of x contains some element of as a subset. We denote the set of all limit points of by lim ℬ.

Note that if x is a limit of a filter base in a topological space X, then x is a cluster point of .[3] If X is Hausdorff then a filter base on X has at most one limit point.[3]

Relation to topology

The relation is of fundamental importance to applying filters to topology. We may use the relation to define the analogue of "subsequence" for filter bases[7] and also to define convergence for filter bases. We will use these definitions to characterize in terms of filters and filter bases concepts like continuity and limits of functions.

  • The notion of " is subordinate to 𝒜" (written ℬ ⊢ 𝒜) is for filters and filter bases what "xn = (xni)
    i=1
    is a subsequence of x = (xi)
    i=1
    " is for sequences (and nets).[7]
    • Indeed, if we let 𝒳 := { xi : i ∈ ℕ } denotes the set of tails of x and 𝒮 denotes the set of tails of the subsequence xn, then 𝒮 ⊢ 𝒳 (i.e. 𝒳 ≤ 𝒮) is true but 𝒳 ⊢ 𝒮 is in general false.
  • If x = (xi)iI is a net in a topological space X, 𝒳 := { xi : iI } is the set of its tails, and 𝒩(x) is the neighborhood filter at a point xX, then xx in X if and only if 𝒩(x) ≤ 𝒳.

Topological vector spaces definitions

Every topological vector spaces (TVS) is a commutative topological group with identity under addition and the canonical uniformity of a TVS is defined entirely in terms of addition. For this reason, we give definitions for an arbitrary commutative topological group with identity (X, +).

Canonical uniformity and Cauchy nets and filters

Let X be an additive commutative topological group with identity element 0.

Definition:[17] If S is a subset of an additive group G and N is a set containing 0, then we say that S is N-small or small of order N if S - SN.
Definition:[18] If X is an additive commutative topological group with a neighborhood basis 𝒩 of the identity element 0, then the canonical uniformity on X is the uniform structure that has as a base of vicinities of the diagonal Δ in X × X all sets of the form Δ(N) := { (x, y) ∈ X × X : x - yU} as N ranges over 𝒩.

Having define a uniform structure on commutative topological groups, the notions of Cauchy nets, Cauchy filters, sequential completeness, and other notions are now defined via their usual definitions for uniform structures. However, for clarity, we review the relevant definitions again.

Cauchy nets

Definition:[17] A net x = (xi)iI in X is called a Cauchy net if for every neighborhood N of 0 in X, there exists some i0I such that xi - xjN for all i, ji0 where i, jI. A Cauchy sequence is a Cauchy net that is a sequence.

Cauchy filter bases

Definition:[17] A filter base on an additive topological group X called a Cauchy filter base if for every neighborhood N of 0 in X, there exists some B ∈ ℬ such that B - BN.

The canonical uniformity is independent of the neighborhood basis 𝒩 that is chosen.

Complete topological group

Definition: A subset S of a topological group X is called complete if it satisfies any of the following equivalent conditions:
  1. S is a complete subset under the uniformity induced on S by the canonical uniformity;
  2. every Cauchy net in X that is contained in S converges to a point of S;
  3. every Cauchy filter in X that is contained in S converges to a point of S.
Definition: A topological group X is called complete if X is complete as a subset of itself.

Examples and sufficient conditions

Topologizing the set of filter bases and Top(X)

Starting with nothing more than a set X, one may topologize the set of  := Prefilters(X) of all filter bases on X with the Stone topology. We first define and describe the basic properties of this topology and then show how one may use it to easily topologize the set of all topologies on X; something is not easily done with nets in X.

To reduce confusion we will adhere to the following notational conventions:

  • Lower case letters for elements xX.
  • Upper case letters for subsets SX.
  • Upper case calligraphy letters for subsets 𝒜 ⊆ ℘(X).
  • Upper case double-struck letters for subsets ℙ ⊆ ℘(℘(X)).

Observe that if RSX then { 𝒜 ∈ ℘(℘(X)) : R ∈ 𝒜X} ⊆ { 𝒜 ∈ ℘(℘(X)) : S ∈ 𝒜X}. For every SX, let

𝕆(S) := { 𝒜 ∈ ℙ : S ∈ 𝒜X}

where note that 𝕆(X) = ℙ and 𝕆(∅) = ∅. One may show that for all R, SX the following holds:

𝕆(RS) = 𝕆(R) ∩ 𝕆(S) ⊆ 𝕆(R) ∪ 𝕆(S) ⊆ 𝕆(RS)

where in particular, the equality 𝕆(RS) = 𝕆(R) ∩ 𝕆(S) shows that the collection of sets { 𝕆(S) : SX} form a basis for a topology on , which we will henceforth assume carries. We will assume that any subset of carries the subspace topology.

Recall that every τ ∈ Top(X) induces a canonical map 𝒩τ : X → Filter(X) defined by x ↦ 𝒩τ(x). Clearly, 𝒩τ : X → Filter(X) is injective if and only if τ is T0 (i.e. a Kolmogorov space). Let 𝒩 : Top(X) → Func(X; ℙ) denote the map τ ↦ 𝒩τ. Since 𝒩 : Top(X) → Func(X; ℙ) is clearly injective, to define a topology on Top(X) it suffices to define a topology on the range Im 𝒩 := { 𝒩τ : τ ∈ Top(X)}. So endow Func(X; ℙ) with the topology of pointwise convergence (no topology on X is needed to do this) and endow Im 𝒩 with the subspace topology. We've thus topologized Top(X).

We now describe some additional properties of the Stone topology. For any 𝕊 ⊆ ℙ and 𝒜 ∈ ℙ,

  • 𝒜 belongs to the closure of 𝕊 in if and only if 𝒜 ⊆ 𝒮 ∈ 𝕊 𝒮X.
  • 𝕊 is a neighborhood of 𝒜 in if and only if there exists some A ∈ 𝒜 such that 𝕆(A) = { 𝒫 ∈ ℙ : A ∈ 𝒫X } ⊆ 𝕊 (i.e. for all 𝒫 ∈ ℙ, if A ∈ 𝒫X then 𝒫 ∈ 𝕊).

For every τ ∈ Top(X), the map 𝒩τ : (X, τ) → Im 𝒩τ is continuous, closed, and open (where Im 𝒩τ has the subspace topology inherited from ). In addition, if 𝔉 : X → Filter(X) is a map such that x ∈ ker 𝔉(x) = F ∈ 𝔉(x) F for every xX, then for every xX and every F ∈ 𝔉(x), 𝔉(F) is a neighborhood of 𝔉(x) in Im 𝔉 (where Im 𝔉 has the subspace topology inherited from ).

gollark: I don't know how this site offers it for free.
gollark: This is probably CLIP+some GAN so slowness is inevitable.
gollark: Why are there two (2) random 3.5" disks on your table thing?
gollark: When I saw the rotated version I briefly mistook it for one of those AI-generated incomprehensible images.
gollark: How *are* they doing that fast enough to be useful?

See also

References

  1. Dolecki 2016, pp. 33-35.
  2. Dolecki 2016, pp. 27-29.
  3. Narici 2011, pp. 2-7.
  4. Dugundji 1966, pp. 215-221.
  5. Wilansky 2013, p. 5.
  6. Dolecki 2016, p. 10.
  7. Dugundji 1966, p. 212.
  8. Narici 2011, pp. 3-4.
  9. Arkhangelʹskiĭ 1984, pp. 7-8.
  10. Dugundji 1966, pp. 211-213.
  11. Wilansky 2013, pp. 44-46.
  12. Wilansky 2013, pp. 40-46.
  13. Dugundji 1966, pp. 218-220.
  14. Dolecki 2016, pp. 37-39.
  15. Arkhangelʹskiĭ 1984, pp. 20-22.
  16. Suppose A ∈ 𝒜 and B ∈ ℬ were such that AB = ∅. Since 𝒜 ≤ ℬ there exists some C ∈ ℬ such that CA so that CBAB = ∅, contradicting the fact that is a filter base. ∎
  17. Narici 2011, p. 48.
  18. Edwards 1995, p. 61.
  • Adasch, Norbert; Ernst, Bruno; Keim, Dieter (1978). Topological Vector Spaces: The Theory Without Convexity Conditions. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. {3834. Berlin New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-3-540-08662-8. OCLC 297140003.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Arkhangel'skii, Alexander Vladimirovich; Ponomarev, V.I. (December 31, 1984). Fundamentals of General Topology: Problems and Exercises. Mathematics and Its Applications. 13. Dordrecht Boston: D. Reidel. ISBN 978-90-277-1355-1. OCLC 9944489.CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  • Jarchow, Hans (1981). Locally convex spaces. Stuttgart: B.G. Teubner. ISBN 978-3-519-02224-4. OCLC 8210342.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Bourbaki, Nicolas (1987) [1981]. Topological Vector Spaces: Chapters 1–5 [Sur certains espaces vectoriels topologiques]. Annales de l'Institut Fourier. Elements of mathematics (in French). 2. Translated by Eggleston, H.G.; Madan, S. Berlin New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-3-540-42338-6. OCLC 17499190.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Conway, John (1990). A course in functional analysis. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. 96 (2nd ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-0-387-97245-9. OCLC 21195908.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Dixmier, Jacques (July 18, 1984). General Topology. Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics. Translated by Berberian, S. K. New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-0-387-90972-1. OCLC 10277303.CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  • Dolecki, Szymon; Mynard, Frederic (May 13, 2016). Convergence Foundations Of Topology. New Jersey: World Scientific Publishing Company. ISBN 978-981-4571-52-4. OCLC 945169917.CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  • James, Dugundji (June 1, 1966). Topology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. ISBN 978-0-697-06889-7. OCLC 395340485.CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  • Dunford, Nelson; Schwartz, Jacob T. (1988). Linear Operators. Pure and applied mathematics. 1. New York: Wiley-Interscience. ISBN 978-0-471-60848-6. OCLC 18412261.
  • Edwards, Robert E. (Jan 1, 1995). Functional Analysis: Theory and Applications. New York: Dover Publications. ISBN 978-0-486-68143-6. OCLC 30593138.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link) CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  • Husain, Taqdir; Khaleelulla, S. M. (December 5, 1978). Written at Berlin Heidelberg. Barrelledness in Topological and Ordered Vector Spaces. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. 692. Berlin New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-3-540-09096-0. OCLC 4493665.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link) CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  • Jarchow, Hans (1981). Locally convex spaces. Stuttgart: B.G. Teubner. ISBN 978-3-519-02224-4. OCLC 8210342.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Joshi, K. D. (August 24, 1983). Introduction to General Topology. New York: John Wiley and Sons Ltd. ISBN 978-0-85226-444-7. OCLC 9218750.CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  • Khaleelulla, S. M. (July 1, 1982). Written at Berlin Heidelberg. Counterexamples in Topological Vector Spaces. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. 936. Berlin New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-3-540-11565-6. OCLC 8588370.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link) CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  • Köthe, Gottfried (1969). Topological Vector Spaces I. Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften. 159. Translated by Garling, D.J.H. New York: Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-3-642-64988-2. MR 0248498. OCLC 840293704.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Köthe, Gottfried (December 19, 1979). Topological Vector Spaces II. Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften. 237. New York: Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-0-387-90400-9. OCLC 180577972.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link) CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  • Narici, Lawrence; Beckenstein, Edward (2011). Topological Vector Spaces. Pure and applied mathematics (Second ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. ISBN 978-1584888666. OCLC 144216834.
  • Robertson, Alex P.; Robertson, Wendy J. (January 1, 1980). Topological Vector Spaces. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics. 53. Cambridge England: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-29882-7. OCLC 589250.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link) CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  • Schaefer, Helmut H.; Wolff, Manfred P. (1999). Topological Vector Spaces. GTM. 8 (Second ed.). New York, NY: Springer New York Imprint Springer. ISBN 978-1-4612-7155-0. OCLC 840278135.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Schechter, Eric (October 30, 1996). Handbook of Analysis and Its Foundations. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-622760-4. OCLC 175294365.CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  • Schubert, Horst (1968). Topology. London: Macdonald & Co. ISBN 978-0-356-02077-8. OCLC 463753.
  • Swartz, Charles (1992). An introduction to Functional Analysis. New York: M. Dekker. ISBN 978-0-8247-8643-4. OCLC 24909067.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Trèves, François (August 6, 2006) [1967]. Topological Vector Spaces, Distributions and Kernels. Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications. ISBN 978-0-486-45352-1. OCLC 853623322.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link) CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  • Wilansky, Albert (2013). Modern Methods in Topological Vector Spaces. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications, Inc. ISBN 978-0-486-49353-4. OCLC 849801114.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Willard, Stephen (February 27, 2004) [1970]. General Topology. Dover Books on Mathematics (First ed.). Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications. ISBN 978-0-486-43479-7. OCLC 115240.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link) CS1 maint: date and year (link)
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.