California Air Resources Board

The California Air Resources Board (CARB or ARB) is the "clean air agency" in the government of California. Established in 1967 when then-governor Ronald Reagan signed the Mulford-Carrell Act, combining the Bureau of Air Sanitation and the Motor Vehicle Pollution Control Board, CARB is a department within the cabinet-level California Environmental Protection Agency.

California Air Resources Board
Logo of the California Air Resources Board
Agency overview
Formed1967
Preceding agencies
  • Bureau of Air Sanitation
  • Motor Vehicle Pollution Control Board
JurisdictionCalifornia
Headquarters1001 I Street Sacramento, California
Employees1,365[1]
Annual budget$581.1 million[1]
Agency executive
Parent agencyCalifornia Environmental Protection Agency
Websitehttp://www.arb.ca.gov

The stated goals of CARB include attaining and maintaining healthy air quality; protecting the public from exposure to toxic air contaminants; and providing innovative approaches for complying with air pollution rules and regulations. CARB has also been instrumental in driving innovation throughout the global automotive industry through programs such as its ZEV mandate.

One of CARB's responsibilities is to define vehicle emissions standards. California is the only state permitted to issue emissions standards under the federal Clean Air Act, subject to a waiver from the United States Environmental Protection Agency. Other states may choose to follow CARB or the federal vehicle emission standards but may not set their own.[2]

Governance
California Air Resources Board Leadership[3]
NameAffiliationAppointedTerm ends
Mary D. Nichols Chair August 2007December 31, 2020
Sandra Berg Vice Chair August 2004December 31, 2022
John R. Balmes, MD Physician December 2007December 31, 2020
Hector De La Torre Assembly June 2018January 1, 2025
John Eisenhut Agriculture August 2013December 31, 2022
Nathan Fletcher San Diego AQMD January 2019
Dean Florez Senate February 2016December 31, 2018
Eduardo Garcia Ex Officio (Assembly) February 2017
John Gioia Bay Area AQMD May 2013December 31, 2020
Judy Mitchell South Coast AQMD May 2013December 31, 2020
Bill Monning Ex Officio (Senate) January 2019
Barbara Riordan Mojave Desert AQMD August 2004December 31, 2022
Phil Serna Sacramento Region Air Districts January 2013December 31, 2022
Alexander Sherriffs, MD San Joaquin Valley APCD August 2012December 31, 2022
Daniel Sperling Automotive February 2007December 31, 2022
Diane Tavorkian Public August 31, 2018December 31, 2022

CARB's governing board is made up of 16 members, with 2 non-voting members appointed for legislative oversight, one each by the California State Assembly and Senate. 12 of the 14 voting members are appointed by the governor and subject to confirmation by the Senate: five from local air districts, four air pollution subject-matter experts, two members of the public, and the Chair. The other two voting members are appointed from environmental justice committees by the Assembly and Senate.[3]

Five of the governor-appointed board members are chosen from regional air pollution control or air quality management districts, including one each from:[3]

Researchers at the Statewide Air Pollution Research Center manufacture smog using a photochemical tube reactor (May 1972)

Four governor-appointed board members are subject matter experts in specific fields: automotive engineering, currently Dan Sperling; science, agriculture, or law, currently John Eisenhut; medicine, currently John R. Balmes, M.D.; and air pollution control. The governor is also responsible for two appointees from members of the public, and the final governor appointee is the Board's Chair. The first Chair of CARB was Dr. Arie Jan Haagen-Smit, who was previously a professor at the California Institute of Technology and started research into air pollution in 1948. Dr. Haagen-Smit is credited with discovering the source of smog in California, which led to the development of air pollution controls and standards.[4]

The two legislature-appointed board members work directly with communities affected by air pollution. They are currently Diane Takvorian and Dean Florez, appointed by the Assembly and Senate respectively.

Organizational structure

CARB has nine major divisions:[5]

  • Administrative Services Division
  • Enforcement Division
  • Mobile Source Control Division
  • Emissions Compliance, Automotive Regulations and Science Division
  • Monitoring and Laboratory Division
  • Office of Information Services
  • Air Quality Planning and Science Division
  • Research Division
  • Toxics and Transportation Division
  • Industrial Strategies Division

Air Quality Planning and Science Division
California Air Resources Board Laboratory, Los Angeles, in 1973

The division assesses the extent of California's air quality problems and the progress being made to abate them, coordinates statewide development of clean air plans and maintains databases pertinent to air quality and emissions. The division's technical support work provides a basis for clean air plans and CARB's regulatory programs. This support includes management and interpretation of emission inventories, air quality data, meteorological data and of air quality modeling.[6]

The Air Quality Planning and Science Division has five branches:

Atmospheric Modeling & Support Section

The Atmospheric Modeling & Support Section is one of three sections within the Modeling & Meteorology Branch. The other two sections are the Regional Air Quality Modeling Section and the Meteorology Section.[6]

The air quality and atmospheric pollution dispersion models[7][8] routinely used by this Section include a number of the models recommended by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The section uses models which were either developed by CARB or whose development was funded by CARB, such as:

  • CALPUFF – Originally developed by the Sigma Research Company (SRC) under contract to CARB. Currently maintained by the TRC Solution Company under contract to the U.S. EPA.
  • CALGRID – Developed by CARB and currently maintained by CARB.[9]
  • SARMAP – Developed by CARB and currently maintained by CARB.[10]

Role in reducing greenhouse gases
See also: Climate change in California

The California Air Resources Board is charged with implementing California's comprehensive suite of policies to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases. In part due to the efforts of CARB, California has successfully decoupled greenhouse gas emissions from economic growth, and achieved its goal of reducing emissions to 1990 levels four years earlier than the target date of 2020.[11]

Alternative Fuel Vehicle Incentive Program

Alternative Fuel Vehicle Incentive Program (also known as Fueling Alternatives) is funded by the California Air Resources Board (CARB), offered throughout the State of California and administered by the California Center for Sustainable Energy (CCSE).[12]

Low-Emission Vehicle Program
Smog in San Gabriel, May 1972

The CARB first adopted the Low-Emission Vehicle (LEV) Program standards in 1990 to address smog-forming pollutants,[13][14] which covered automobiles sold in California from 1994 through 2003. An amendment to the LEV Program, known as LEV II, was adopted in 1999, and covered vehicles for the 2004 through 2014 model years.[15] Greenhouse gas (GHG) emission regulations were adopted in 2004 starting for the 2009 model year, and are named the "Pavley" standards after Assemblymember Fran Pavley, who had written Assembly Bill 1493 in 2002 to establish them.[16][17] A second amendment, LEV III, was adopted in 2012, and covers vehicles sold from 2015 onward for both smog (superseding LEV II) and GHG (superseding Pavley) emissions.[18][19] The rules created under the LEV Program have been codified as specific sections in Title 13 of the California Code of Regulations;[20] in general, LEV I is § 1960.1; LEV II is § 1961; Pavley is § 1961.1; LEV III is § 1961.2 (smog-forming pollutants) and 1961.3 (GHG). The ZEV regulations, which were initially part of LEV I, have been broken out separately into § 1962.[21]

For comparison, the average new car sold in 1965 would produce approximately 2,000 lb (910 kg) of hydrocarbons over 100,000 mi (160,000 km) of driving; under the LEV I standards, the average new car sold in 1998 was projected to produce hydrocarbon emissions of 50 lb (23 kg) over the same distance, and under LEV II, the average new car in 2010 would further reduce hydrocarbon emissions to 10 lb (4.5 kg).[22]

Required labeling
Global Warming & Smog Scores
Global
Warming
Score		 CO
2
(g/mi)		 Smog
Score		 MY (2009)2013–2017[lower-alpha 1][23] MY 2018+[lower-alpha 2][24]
CA
LEV II		EPA
Tier 2		NMOG+NO
x
(g/mi)		CA
LEV III		EPA
Tier 3		NMOG+NO
x
(g/mi)
10 <200 10 ZEVBin 10.000 ZEVBin 00.000
9 200–239 9 AT PZEV, PZEV—0.030 ——
8 240–279 8 SULEVBin 20.030 SULEV20Bin 200.020
7 280–319 7 —Bin 30.085 SULEV30Bin 300.030
6 320–359 6 —Bin 40.110 ULEV50Bin 500.050
5 360–399 5 ULEV—0.125 ULEV70Bin 700.070
4 400–439 4 LEVBin 50.160 ——
3 440–479 3 —Bin 60.190 – 0.200 ULEV125Bin 1250.125
2 480–519 2 —Bin 70.240 ——
1 ≥520 1 —[lower-alpha 3]Bin 8a0.325 LEV160Bin 1600.160
Notes
  1. Based on the scoring for the "Environmental Performance Label", applied to new vehicles model years 2009–2012 in California. The California label was aligned with Federal standards in 2013.
  2. Scoring realigned with LEV III/Tier 3 scores starting in model year 2018. Note the change in standards; for example, a LEV under LEV II (160 mg/mi) which was rated with a smog score of 4 under the old label would now be rated with as LEV160 under LEV III and would receive a smog score of 1.
  3. ULEV under California LEV I standard.

In 2005, the California State Assembly passed AB 1229, which required all new vehicles manufactured after January 1, 2009 to bear an Environmental Performance Label, which scored the emissions performance of the vehicle on two scales ranging between 1 (worst) and 10 (best): one for global warming (emissions of GHG such as N
2O, CH
4, air conditioning refrigerants, and CO
2) and one for smog-forming compounds (non-methane organic gases (NMOG), NO
x, and HC).[23][25] The Federal Government followed suit and required a similar "smog score" on new vehicles sold starting in 2013; the standards were realigned for labels applied to 2018 model year vehicles.

Vehicle categories

The LEV program has established several categories of reduced emissions vehicles. LEV I defined LEV and ULEV vehicles, and added TLEV and Tier 1 temporary classifications that would not be sold after 2003. LEV II added SULEV and PZEV vehicles, and LEV III tightened emission standards. The actual emission levels depend on the standards in use.

  • LEV (Low Emission Vehicle): The least stringent emission standard for all new cars sold in California beyond 2004.
  • ULEV (Ultra Low Emission Vehicle): 50% cleaner than the average new 2003 model year vehicle.
  • SULEV (Super Ultra Low Emission Vehicle): These vehicles emit substantially lower levels of hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, oxides of nitrogen and particulate matter than conventional vehicles. They are 90% cleaner than the average new 2003 model year vehicle.

LEV I defined emission limits for several different classes of vehicle, including passenger cars (PC), light-duty trucks (LDT), and medium-duty vehicles (MDV). Heavy-duty vehicles were specifically excluded from LEV I. LEV I also defined a loaded vehicle weight (LVW) as the vehicle's kerb weight plus an allowance of 300 lb (140 kg). In general, the most stringent standards were applied to passenger cars and light-duty trucks with a LVW up to 3,750 lb (1,700 kg) (these "light" LDTs were later denoted LDT1 under LEV II).[14] LEV II increased the scope of vehicles classed as light-duty trucks to encompass a higher GVWR up to 8,500 lb (3,900 kg), compared to the LEV I standard of 6,000 lb (2,700 kg). In addition, LEV I had defined less stringent limits for heavier LDTs (denoted LDT2 with a LVW 3,751–5,750 lb (1,701–2,608 kg)); LEV II closed that discrepancy and defined a single emissions standard for all PCs and LDTs.[15] Under LEV III, medium-duty passenger vehicles (MDPV) were brought under the most stringent standards alongside PCs and LDTs.[18]

Vehicle classes under the LEV regulations[14][15][18]
ClassAbbr.GVWRNotes
Passenger carPC —Designed primarily for transportation of persons with a design capacity of ≤12 people.
Light-duty truckLDT ≤6,000 lb
2,700 kg[lower-alpha 1]		Designed primarily for transportation of property, derivatives of those, or available with special features for off-street use. LDT1 was defined as those with LVW up to 3,750 lb (1,700 kg), and LDT2 was defined as those with LVW from 3,751 to 5,750 lb (1,701 to 2,608 kg).
≤8,500 lb
3,900 kg[lower-alpha 2]
Medium-duty vehicleMDV ≤8,500 lb
3,900 kg[lower-alpha 3]		Any non-passenger vehicle with a GVWR >6,000 lb (2,700 kg) and less than the limits shown here.
≤14,000 lb
6,400 kg[lower-alpha 4]
Notes
  1. For model years before 2000
  2. For model years 2000 and subsequent
  3. For model years before 1995
  4. For model years 1995 and subsequent, or model years 1992 and subsequent LEV, ULEV, SULEV, or ZEV.

Smog-forming compound emissions limits

Rather than providing a single standard for vehicles based on age, purpose, and weight, the LEV I standards introduced different tiers of limits for smog-forming compound emissions starting in the 1995 model year. After 2003, LEV was the minimum standard to be met.[14]

California Emissions Standards[lower-alpha 1][lower-alpha 2][lower-alpha 3][26]
Category NMOG[lower-alpha 4]+NO
x[lower-alpha 5]		 CO PM[lower-alpha 6] HCHO
LEV I[lower-alpha 7][14] LEV II[lower-alpha 8][15] LEV III[lower-alpha 9][18] LEV I[lower-alpha 7] LEV II[lower-alpha 8] LEV III[lower-alpha 9] LEV I[lower-alpha 7] LEV II[lower-alpha 8] LEV III[lower-alpha 9] LEV I[lower-alpha 7] LEV II[lower-alpha 8] LEV III[lower-alpha 9]
Tier 1[lower-alpha 10] 0.91[lower-alpha 11][lower-alpha 12][lower-alpha 13] — — 4.2[lower-alpha 14] — — — — — —[lower-alpha 15] — —
TLEV[lower-alpha 10] 0.756[lower-alpha 16] — — 4.2 — — 0.08 — — 0.018 — —
LEV LEV160 0.390[lower-alpha 17] 0.160[lower-alpha 18] 0.160 4.2 4.2 4.2 0.08 0.01 0.01 0.018 0.018 0.004
ULEV ULEV125 0.355[lower-alpha 19] 0.125[lower-alpha 20] 0.125 2.1 2.1 2.1 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.011 0.011 0.004
ULEV70 0.070 1.7
ULEV50 0.050
SULEV[lower-alpha 21] SULEV30 — 0.030[lower-alpha 22] 0.030 — 1.0 1.0 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.004 0.004
SULEV20 0.020
Notes
  1. Values are in grams per mile for all passenger cars and those light-duty trucks with a loaded vehicle weight (total of kerb weight plus 300 lb (140 kg) driver) less than 3,750 lb (1,700 kg), tested under the FTP-75 protocol.
  2. Under LEV II and LEV III, the definition of light duty trucks was expanded to encompass all vehicles with a gross vehicle weight rating of 8,500 lb (3,900 kg) or less.
  3. Under LEV III, this category also now includes all medium-duty passenger vehicles with a GVWR of 10,000 lb (4,500 kg) or less.
  4. Non-methane organic gases
  5. NMOG and NO
    x     were reported separately under LEV I and LEV II
  6. Particulate Matter
  7. LEV I standards are given for emissions at the 100,000 mi (160,000 km) / 10 year age
  8. LEV II standards are given for emissions at the 120,000 mi (190,000 km) / 11 year age
  9. LEV III standards are given for emissions at the 150,000 mi (240,000 km) age
  10. Tier 1 and transitional LEV (TLEV) vehicles were not sold after 2003.
  11. LEV I: 0.31 g/mi NMOG + 0.6 g/mi NO
    x    .
  12. LEV I: 0.31 g/mi NMOG + 1.0 g/mi NO
    x     for diesel-powered vehicles.
  13. For comparison, the values for 1988–94 model year passenger cars, light-duty trucks, and medium-duty trucks (<3,750 LVW) were 0.39–0.46 g/mi NMOG and 0.4-1.0 g/mi NO
    x    .
  14. For comparison, the values for 1988–94 model year passenger cars were 7.0-8.3 g/mi CO, and for light-duty trucks and medium-duty trucks (<3,750 LVW), 9.0-10.6 g/mi CO.
  15. Formaldehyde standards provided for 1993 and newer model year vehicles fueled by methanol and ethanol: for passenger cars, light-duty trucks and medium-duty trucks (<3,750 LVW), 0.023 g/mi HCHO for 1993–95 and 0.015 g/mi HCHO for 1996+
  16. LEV I: 0.156 g/mi NMOG + 0.6 g/mi NO
    x
  17. LEV I: 0.090 g/mi NMOG + 0.3 g/mi NO
    x
  18. LEV II: 0.090 g/mi NMOG + 0.07 g/mi NO
    x
  19. LEV I: 0.055 g/mi NMOG + 0.3 g/mi NO
    x
  20. LEV II: 0.055 g/mi NMOG + 0.07 g/mi NO
    x
  21. SULEV for passenger cars and light-duty trucks was not defined until LEV II.
  22. LEV II: 0.010 g/mi NMOG + 0.02 g/mi NO
    x

Greenhouse gas emissions limits
Sunlight filtered through smog near Blythe, May 1972

CARB adopted regulations for limits on greenhouse gas emissions in 2004 starting with the 2009 model year to support the direction provided by AB 1493.[16] In June 2005, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed Executive Order S-03-05, which required a reduction in California GHG emissions, targeting an 80% reduction compared to 1990 levels by 2050.[27] Assembly Bill 32, better known as the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, codified these requirements.[28]

CARB filed a waiver request with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under Section 209(b) of the Clean Air Act in December 2005 to permit it to establish limits on greenhouse gas emissions; although the waiver request was initially denied in March 2008, it was later approved on June 30, 2009 after President Barack Obama signed a Presidential Memorandum directing the EPA to reconsider the waiver.[16][29] In the initial denial, EPA Administrator Stephen L. Johnson stated the Clean Air Act was not "intended to allow California to promulgate state standards for emissions from new motor vehicles designed to address global climate change problems" and further, that he did not believe "the effects of climate change in California are compelling and extraordinary compared to the effects in the rest of the country."[30] Johnson's successor, Lisa P. Jackson, signed the waiver overturning Johnson's denial, writing that "EPA must grant California a waiver if California determines that its standards are, in the aggregate, at least as protective of the public health and welfare as applicable Federal standards." Jackson also noted that in the history of the waiver process, over 50 waivers had been granted and only one had been fully denied, namely the March 2008 denial of the GHG emissions regulation.[31]

Greenhouse gas fleet average emissions targets[32]
Model
Year		(g/mi CO
2-equivalent)
PCs & LDT1sLDT2s & MDPVs
2009 323439
2010 301420
2011 267390
2012 233361
2013 227355
2014 222350
2015 213341
2016+ 205332

CARB decided to adopt regulation of GHG emissions under Executive Order G-05-061, which provided phase-in targets for fleet average GHG emissions in CO
2-equivalent grams per mile starting with the 2009 model year.[32] The calculation of CO
2-equivalent emissions was based on contributions from four different chemicals:

The emissions in g/mi CO
2-equivalent are calculated according to the formula , which has two terms for direct and indirect emissions allowances of air conditioning refrigerants, depending on the refrigerant used, such as HFC134a, and the system design. Vehicles powered by alternative fuels use a slightly modified formula, , where is a fuel adjustment factor depending on the alternative fuel used (1.03 for natural gas, 0.89 for LPG, and 0.74 for E85). ZEVs are also required to calculate GHG as the processes to generate the energy (or fuel) used also produce GHG. For ZEVs, , where is the upstream emissions factor (130 g/mi for battery electric vehicles, 210 for hydrogen/fuel cell, and 290 for hydrogen/internal combustion).[32] Direct CO
2 emissions could be calculated in a relatively straightforward fashion based on fuel consumption.[33] Manufacturers that do not wish to measure N
2O emissions may assume a value of 0.006 g/mi.[32] An update was issued in 2010 which allowed manufacturers to calculate GHG emissions using CAFE data; for conventionally powered vehicles, the contribution from the nitrous oxide and methane terms could be assumed to be 1.9 g/mi.[34]

CARB voted unanimously in March 2017 to require automakers to average 54.5 mpg for new cars in 2025.[35]

Section 177 states
Section 177 states:
 •      blue=LEV only
 •      green=LEV+ZEV
 •      red=LEV repealed
"California emissions" states[36][37][38]
StateLEVZEVMY
CA YesYes2005
CO YesYes2022
CT YesYes2008
DC YesNo2012
DE YesNo2014
MA YesYes2009
MD YesYes2011
ME YesYes2009
NJ YesYes2009
NY YesYes2009
OR YesYes2009
PA YesNo2008
RI YesYes2009
VT YesYes2009
WA YesNo2009

Because California had emissions regulations prior to the 1977 Clean Air Act, under Section 177 of that bill,[39] other states may adopt the more stringent California emissions regulations as an alternative to Federal standards. Thirteen other states and the District of Columbia have chosen to do so, and ten of those have additionally adopted the California Zero-Emission Vehicle regulations.[36][37][40]

Arizona and New Mexico had previously adopted California LEV regulations under Section 177, but later repealed those states' clean car standards in 2012[41] and 2013,[42] respectively.[43]

In Canada, the province of Quebec adopted CARB standards effective in 2010.[44] CARB and the Government of Canada entered into a Memorandum of Understanding in June 2019 to cooperate on greenhouse gas emissions mitigation.[45]

Zero-Emission Vehicle Program

The CARB Zero-Emission Vehicle (ZEV) program was enacted by the California government to promote the use of zero emission vehicles.[46] The program goal is to reduce the pervasive air pollution affecting the main metropolitan areas in the state, particularly in Los Angeles, where prolonged pollution episodes are frequent. The California ZEV rule was first adopted by CARB as part of the 1990 Low-Emission Vehicle (LEV I) Program.[13] The focus of the 1990 rules (ZEV-90) was to meet air quality standards for ozone rather than the reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.[47]:5

Under LEV II in 1999, the ZEV regulations were moved to a separate section (13 CCR § 1962) and the requirements for ZEVs as a percentage of fleet sales was made more formal. Executive Order S-03-05 (2005) and Assembly Bills 1493 (2002) and 32 (2006) prompted CARB to reevaluate the ZEV program as last amended in 1996, which had been primarily concerned with reducing emissions of smog-forming pollutants.[47] By the time AB 32 passed in 2006, vehicles complying with PZEV and AT PZEV standards had become commercially successful, and the ZEV program could then shift towards reducing both smog-forming compounds and greenhouse gases.[47]

Vehicle definitions

LEV I defined a ZEV as one that produces "zero emissions of any criteria pollutants under any and all possible operational modes and conditions." A vehicle could still qualify as a ZEV with a fuel-fired heater, as long as the heater was unable to be operated at ambient temperatures above 40 °F (4 °C) and did not have any evaporative emissions.[14]:2–6;2–7 Under LEV II (ZEV-99), the ZEV definition was updated to include precursor pollutants, but did not consider upstream emissions from power plants.[48]:C-1

The ZEV regulation has evolved and been modified several times since 1990, and several new partial or low-emission categories were created and defined,[49][50][51][52] including the introduction of PZEV and AT PZEV categories in ZEV-99.[48]:B-1;B-2

  • PZEV (Partial Zero Emission Vehicle): Meets SULEV tailpipe standards, has a 15-year / 150,000 mile warranty, and zero evaporative emissions. These vehicles are 80% cleaner than the average 2002 model year car.
  • AT PZEV (Advanced Technology PZEV): These are advanced technology vehicles that meet PZEV standards and include ZEV enabling technology, typically hybrid electric vehicles (HEV). They are 80% cleaner than the average 2002 model year car.
  • ZEV (Zero Emission Vehicle): Zero tailpipe emissions, and 98% cleaner than the average new 2003 model year vehicle.

Manufacturer sales volume

Under ZEV-90, CARB classified manufacturers according to the average sales per year between 1989 and 1993; small volume manufacturers were those that sold 3,000 or fewer new vehicles per year; intermediate volume manufacturers sold between 3,001 and 35,000; and large volume manufacturers sold more than 35,000 per year.[14]:2–3 For large volume manufacturers, CARB required that 2% of 1998 to 2000 model year vehicles sold were ZEVs, ramping up to 5% ZEVs by 2001 and 10% ZEVs in 2003 and beyond. Intermediate volume manufacturers were not required to meet the goals until 2003, and small volume manufacturers were exempted. These percentages were calculated based on total production of passenger cars and light-duty trucks with a loaded vehicle weight (LVW) less than 3,750 lb (1,700 kg).[14]:3–22 to 3–24 [53]

ZEV credit system
ZEV-96 Credits[54]
Model
Year		2 ZEV Count3 ZEV Count
Range
(mi)		Specific Energy
(Wh/kg)		Range
(mi)		Specific Energy
(Wh/kg)
1996–97 anyany ≥70≥40
1998 ≥100 ≥130
1999 ≥50 ≥60
2000 ≥140 ≥175
2001–02 ≥60 ≥90

The LEV I rules also introduced the concept of emission credits. Under LEV I, the vehicle fleet average emissions rate of non-methane organic gases (NMOG) produced by a manufacturer was required to meet increasingly stringent requirements starting in 1994.[14]:3–18 The calculation of fleet average NMOG emissions was based on a weighted sum of vehicle NMOG emissions, based on the number sold and type of certification (i.e., TLEV, LEV, ULEV, etc.), divided by the total number of vehicles produced, including ZEVs.[14]:3–20 Manufacturers whose fleet average NMOG emissions met or exceeded the NMOG emissions goal would be subjected to civil penalties; those which fell below the goal would receive credits, which could then be marketed to other manufacturers.[14]:3–24

The 1996 amendments to the ZEV regulations in LEV I (ZEV-96) introduced credits where a ZEV could be counted more than once based on vehicle range or battery specific energy to encourage deployment of ZEVs prior to 2003.[54]:3–4

Under LEV II/ZEV-99, the PZEV and AT PZEV categories were introduced, and the percentage of ZEVs sold by a manufacturer could be partially met by the sales of PZEV and AT PZEVs.[48]:C-2 If a vehicle met PZEV criteria, it qualified for a credit equal to 0.2 of one ZEV for the purposes of calculating that manufacturer's ZEV production.[48]:C-6 AT PZEVs capable of traveling with zero emissions for a limited range were allowed additional credit if the urban all-electric range was at least ten miles.[48]:C-7 ZEVs that were introduced prior to 2003 received a multiplier, with a value ranging up to 10× a single ZEV depending on the all-electric range and fast-charging capability.[48]:C-11;C-12

MOA demonstration fleet
MOA EVs (1997+)[55]
MfrModelDateBatteryRangeQty
(12/97)
Chrysler EPIC ?/97SLA60 mi
97 km		17
Ford Ranger EV ?/97SLA60 mi
97 km		10
GM EV1 12/96SLA75 mi
121 km		265
GM S-10 EV ?/97SLA40 mi
64 km		354
NiMH80 mi
130 km		7
Honda EV Plus 05/97NiMH125 mi
201 km		104
Nissan Altra ?/98Li-ion120 mi
190 km		—
Toyota RAV4 EV 10/97NiMH125 mi
201 km		69

In March 1996, ZEV-96 eliminated the ZEV ramp-up planned to start in 1998, but the goal of 10% ZEVs by 2003 was retained, with credits granted for sales of partial ZEVs (PZEVs).[54][49] According to comment responses, CARB determined that advanced batteries would not be ready in time to meet the ZEV requirements until at least 2003.[56]:6–7

GM EV1

In conjunction with relaxing the requirements in ZEV-96, CARB signed memoranda of agreement (MOAs) with the seven large scale manufacturers to begin rolling out demonstration fleets of ZEVs with limited public availability in the near term. The GM EV1 was the first battery electric vehicle (BEV) offered to the public, in partial fulfillment of the agreement with CARB. The EV1 was available only through a US$399 (equivalent to $650 in 2019)/month lease starting in December 1996; the initial markets were South Coast, San Diego, and Arizona, and expanded to Sacramento and the Bay Area. GM also offered an electric S-10 pickup truck to fleet operators.[55]

In 1997, Honda (EV Plus, May 1997), Toyota (RAV4 EV, October 1997), and Chrysler (EPIC, 1997) followed suit. Ford also introduced the Ranger EV for the 1998 model year, and Nissan stated they planned to offer the Altra in the 1998 model year as well to fulfill the MOA. As an acceptable alternative, Mazda stated they would purchase ZEV credits from Ford.[55]:7–10

Future

The Low-Emission Vehicle Program is currently under revision to define modified ZEV regulations for 2015 models.[49][57][58] CARB estimates the ZEV program will result in 15% ZEV sales by 2025. The share remained at 3% between 2014 and 2016. Battery vehicles receive 3 or 4 credits, while fuel cell cars receive 9. As of 2016, a credit has a market value of $3-4,000, and some automakers have more credits than required.[59][60]

Low-carbon fuel standard
Main article: Low-carbon fuel standard

The Low-Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) requires oil refineries and distributors to ensure that the mix of fuel they sell in the Californian market meets the established declining targets for greenhouse gas emissions measured in CO2-equivalent grams per unit of fuel energy sold for transport purposes. The 2007 Governor's LCFS directive calls for a reduction of at least 10% in the carbon intensity of California's transportation fuels by 2020. These reductions include not only tailpipe emissions but also all other associated emissions from production, distribution and use of transport fuels within the state. Therefore, California LCFS considers the fuel's full life cycle, also known as the "well to wheels" or "seed to wheels" efficiency of transport fuels.[13][61] The standard is aimed to reduce the state’s dependence on petroleum, create a market for clean transportation technology, and stimulate the production and use of alternative, low-carbon fuels in California.[62]

On April 23, 2009, CARB approved the specific rules for the LCFS that will go into effect in January 2011.[63][64] The rule proposal prepared by its technical staff was approved by a 9-1 vote, to set the 2020 maximum carbon intensity reference value to 86 grams of carbon dioxide released per megajoule of energy produced.[62][65]

PHEV Research Center

The PHEV Research Center was launched with funding from the California Air Resources Board.

Innovative Clean Transit

Under the Innovative Clean Transit (formerly known as the Advanced Clean Transit) regulation adopted in December 2018, public transportation agencies in California will gradually transition to a zero-emission bus fleet by 2040.[66] Large transit agencies (defined as those operating more than 65 buses in the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin or South Coast Air Quality Management District, or those operating more than 100 buses elsewhere with populations greater than 200,000) are required to have 25% of new bus purchases as zero-emission buses (ZEBs) starting in 2023, 50% of new purchases as ZEBs starting in 2026, and 100% of new purchases as ZEBs starting in 2029. Small transit agencies are required to make 25% of new purchases as ZEBs in 2026 and 100% of new purchases as ZEBs in 2029+. Per the regulation, ZEBs are defined to include battery electric buses and fuel cell buses, but do not include electric trolleybuses which draw power from overhead lines.[67] The Antelope Valley Transit Authority has set a goal to be the first all-electric fleet by the end of 2018, ahead of the tightened regulations.[68]

Criticism

CARB's Goods Movement Emission Reduction Plan (GMERP) has been criticized by a coalition of California truck owners, farmers, construction contractors and business and community leaders. The coalition has estimated that "applying the new emissions regulations to the 2.3 million or so diesel trucks that move goods throughout California could cost at least $8 billion".[69]

gollark: Useful tactic: brand any complaint about you as hate speech.
gollark: Many traits + Discord account.
gollark: Still here, game is crashy.
gollark: Roughly.
gollark: `SELECT * FROM trademarks WHERE POSITION(stemmed_trademark in stemmed_words) > 0`

See also
California Air Resources Board
Other

References
  1. "2015-16 Budget of California". Retrieved January 1, 2016.
  2. "Vehicle Emissions California Waivers and Authorizations". United States Environmental Protection Agency. August 2, 2016. Retrieved November 25, 2016.
  3. "Leadership - California Air Resources Board". California Air Resources Board. Retrieved 5 December 2018.
  4. "Dr. Arie Haagen-Smit: Founding Chairman". California Air Resources Board. Retrieved 5 December 2018.
  5. board, california air resources. "Organizations within the California Air Resources Board". www.arb.ca.gov.
  6. ARB's Planning and Technical Support Division Archived 2006-09-23 at the Wayback Machine, arb.ca.gov; accessed February 28, 2015.
  7. Turner, D.B. (1994). Workbook of atmospheric dispersion estimates: an introduction to dispersion modeling (2nd ed.). CRC Press. ISBN 978-1-56670-023-8.
  8. Beychok, Milton R. (2005). Fundamentals of Stack Gas Dispersion (4th ed.). author-published. ISBN 978-0-9644588-0-2.
  9. "CALGRID Model". Archived from the original on 2006-09-23. Retrieved 2006-08-26.
  10. CARB's SARMAP Model Archived 2006-09-23 at the Wayback Machine
  11. "Climate Pollutants Fall Below 1990 Levels for First Time". California Air Resources Board. Retrieved 27 July 2018.
  12. "Incentive Program for Alternative Fuels and Vehicles". California Air Resources Board. 2010-09-30. Retrieved 2011-11-07.
  13. Sperling, Daniel; Gordon, Deborah (2009). Two billion cars: driving toward sustainability. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 24, 189–191. ISBN 978-0-19-537664-7. Retrieved 6 December 2018.
  14. "California exhaust emission standards and test procedures for 1988 and subsequent model passenger cars, light-duty trucks, and medium-duty vehicles" (PDF). California Environmental Protection Agency: Air Resources Board. June 24, 1996. Retrieved 5 December 2018.
  15. "Attachment A-2: California 2001 through 2014 model criteria pollutant exhaust emission standards and test procedures and 2009 through 2016 greenhouse gas exhaust emission standards and test procedures for passenger cars, light-duty trucks, and medium-duty vehicles" (PDF). California Environmental Protection Agency: Air Resources Board. March 22, 2012. Retrieved 5 December 2018.
  16. "Clean Car Standards - Pavley, Assembly Bill 1493". California Air Resources Board. January 11, 2017. Retrieved 7 December 2018.
  17. California State Assembly. "An act to amend Section 42823 of, and to add Section 43018.5 to, the Health and Safety Code, relating to air quality". Session of the Legislature. Statutes of California. State of California. Ch. 200 p. 864. direct URL
  18. "Attachment A-3: California 2015 and subsequent model criteria pollutant exhaust emission standards and test procedures and 2017 and subsequent greenhouse gas exhaust emission standards and test procedures for passenger cars, light-duty trucks, and medium-duty vehicles" (PDF). California Environmental Protection Agency: Air Resources Board. March 22, 2012. Retrieved 5 December 2018.
  19. "Low-Emission Vehicle Program". California Air Resources Board. January 25, 2017. Retrieved 5 December 2018.
  20. "Low-Emission Vehicle Regulations and Test Procedures". California Air Resources Board. October 18, 2017. Retrieved 5 December 2018.
  21. "The California Low-Emission Vehicle Regulations (With Amendments Effective October 16, 2017)" (PDF). California Air Resources Board. October 16, 2017. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 December 2017. Retrieved 6 December 2018.
  22. "Fact Sheet: LEV II - Amendments to California's Low-Emission Vehicle regulations" (PDF). California Air Resources Board. February 1999. Retrieved 5 December 2018.
  23. Chiladakis, Lisa (March 2010). "Environmental Performance Label" (PDF). California Air Resources Board. Retrieved 5 December 2018.
  24. "Understand the Smog Rating". DriveClean. Retrieved 5 December 2018.
  25. California State Assembly. "An act to amend Section 43200 of, and to add Section 43200.1 to, the Health and Safety Code, relating to air pollution". Session of the Legislature. Statutes of California. State of California. Ch. 575 p. 4355. direct URL
  26. "Emission Standards: United States: Cars and Light-Duty Trucks: California". DieselNet. Retrieved 5 December 2018.
  27. "California Executive Order S-3-05". State of California, Office of the Governor. June 1, 2005. Archived from the original on 22 September 2006. Retrieved 6 December 2018.
  28. California State Assembly. "An act to add Division 25.5 (commencing with Section 38500) to the Health and Safety Code, relating to air pollution". Session of the Legislature. Statutes of California. State of California. Ch. 488 p. 3419. direct URL
  29. "California Greenhouse Gas Waiver Request". United States Environmental Protection Agency. June 30, 2009. Retrieved 7 December 2018.
  30. Johnson, Stephen L. (March 6, 2008). "California State Motor Vehicle Pollution Control Standards; Notice of Decision Denying a Waiver of Clean Air Act Preemption for Californias 2009 and Subsequent Model Year Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards for New Motor Vehicles". United States Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved 7 December 2018.
  31. Jackson, Lisa P. (June 30, 2009). "California State Motor Vehicle Pollution Control Standards; Notice of Decision Denying a Waiver of Clean Air Act Preemption for Californias 2009 and Subsequent Model Year Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards for New Motor Vehicles". United States Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved 7 December 2018.
  32. "Final Regulation Order: Amendments to Sections 1900 and 1961, and Adoption of new Section 1961.1, Title 13, California Code of Regulations" (PDF). California Air Resources Board. September 15, 2005. Retrieved 7 December 2018.
  33. "How to calculate the CO2 emission from the fuel consumption?". ecoscore. Retrieved 7 December 2018.
  34. "Final Regulation Order" (PDF). California Air Resources Board. April 1, 2010. Retrieved 7 December 2018.
  35. "What's New List Serve Post Display". www.arb.ca.gov.
  36. "States that have Adopted California's Vehicle Standards under Section 177 of the Federal Clean Air Act". California Air Resources Board. March 27, 2019. Retrieved 18 October 2019.
  37. "Fact Sheet: The Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) Regulation" (PDF). California Air Resources Board. Retrieved 5 December 2018.
  38. "States Adopting California's Clean Cars Standards". Maryland Department of the Environment. Retrieved 5 December 2018.
  39. 42 U.S.C. § 7507
  40. Neustifter, Jeremy (November 16, 2018). "Air Quality Control Commission approves low emission vehicle standards" (Press release). State of Colorado, Department of Public Health & Environment. Retrieved 28 January 2019.
  41. "Notice of final rulemaking" (PDF). Arizona Department of Environmental Quality. November 2011. Retrieved 28 January 2019.
  42. "Petition to repeal regulations" (PDF). State of New Mexico, Environmental Improvement Board. June 2013. Retrieved 28 January 2019.
  43. "State Action". Clean Cars Campaign. Archived from the original on 29 January 2019. Retrieved 28 January 2019.
  44. "Quebec adopts California car emissions standards". CBC. December 29, 2009. Retrieved 28 January 2019.
  45. "Memorandum of Understanding between the California Air Resourcese Board, of the State of California, and Environment and Climate Change Canada, of the Government of Canada to Enhance Cooperation on Measures that Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions" (PDF). Environment and Climate Change Canada. 26 June 2019. Retrieved 18 October 2019.
  46. "California's Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) Program". Union of Concerned Scientists. 2009-01-30. Retrieved 2009-04-21.
  47. Summary of Staff's Preliminary Assessment of the Need for Revisions to the Zero Emission Vehicle Regulation (PDF) (Report). California Air Resources Board. November 25, 2009. Retrieved 6 December 2018.
  48. "California exhaust emission standards and test procedures for 2005 through 2008 model zero-emission vehicles, and 2001 through 2008 model hybrid electric vehicles, in the passenger car, light-duty truck and medium-duty vehicle classes" (PDF). California Air Resources Board. December 2, 2009. Retrieved 10 December 2018.
  49. "Zero-Emission Vehicle Legal and Regulatory Activities: The ZEV Program Timeline". California Air Resources Board. 2011-10-14. Archived from the original on 2014-10-06. Retrieved 2014-09-22.
  50. "Fact Sheet: California Vehicle Emissions" (PDF). California Air Resources Board. 2004-04-08. Archived from the original (pdf) on 2009-04-11. Retrieved 2009-04-21.
  51. Sherry Boschert (2006). Plug-in Hybrids: The Cars that will Recharge America. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, Canada. pp. 15–28. ISBN 978-0-86571-571-4. See the box "Zero-Emission Vehicle (ZEV) Mandate Timeline", pp. 23-28
  52. Christine & Scott Gable. "What is a ZEV - Zero Emissions Vehicle?". About.com: Hybrid Cars & Alt Fuels. Retrieved 2008-04-21.
  53. According to the LEV I regulations, the LVW is defined as the sum of the vehicle's kerb weight and a 300 lb (140 kg) allowance for the driver and fuel.
  54. "Final Regulation Order: Sections 1900, 1960.1 and 1976, Title 13, CCR" (PDF). California Air Resources Board. March 28, 1996. Retrieved 6 December 2018.
  55. 1998 Zero-emission vehicle biennial program review (PDF) (Report). California Air Resources Board. July 6, 1998. Retrieved 6 December 2018.
  56. "Final Statement of Reasons for Rulemaking Including Summary of Comments and Agency Response" (PDF). California Air Resources Board. March 28, 1996. Retrieved 6 December 2018.
  57. "California Air Resources Board Votes to Modify ZEV Program in Short-Term; Complete Overhaul to Begin for New ZEV II". Green Car Congress. 2008-03-27. Retrieved 2009-04-21.
  58. "Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) Program". California Air Resources Board. 2009-02-27. Retrieved 2009-04-21.
  59. Rory Carroll and Alexandria Sage (2016-09-01). "California's zero-emission vehicle program is stuck in neutral". Archived from the original on 2016-10-12. Retrieved 2017-07-26 – via Reuters.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
  60. "Zero-emission vehicle sales in the U.S". Reuters.
  61. "Low-Carbon Fuel Standard Program". California Air Resources Board. 2009-04-14. Retrieved 2009-04-23.
  62. "Proposed Regulation to Implement the Low Carbon Fuel Standard. Volume I: Staff Report: Initial Statement of Reasons" (PDF). California Air Resources Board. 2009-03-05. Retrieved 2009-04-26.
  63. Wyatt Buchanan (2009-04-24). "Air Resources Board moves to cut carbon use". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 2009-04-25.
  64. Young, Samantha (2009-04-24). "Calif. Approves Nation's 1st Low-Carbon Fuel Rule". phys.org. The Associated Press. Retrieved 2009-04-25.
  65. UNICA press release (2009-04-24). "Sugarcane Ethanol Passes Critical Test in California". World-Wire. Archived from the original on 2009-04-26. Retrieved 2009-04-25.
  66. "California transitioning to all-electric public bus fleet by 2040" (Press release). California Air Resources Board. December 14, 2018. Retrieved 3 January 2019.
  67. "Final Regulation Order, Title 13, California Code of Regulations, Section 2023" (PDF). California Air Resources Board. December 14, 2018. Retrieved 3 January 2019.
  68. "Electric Bus Fleet Conversion". Antelope Valley Transit Authority. Retrieved 3 January 2019.
  69. "COMMENTARY: Diesel risks mostly hot air?". The Washington Times. May 27, 2008. Retrieved 2020-01-25.
News
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.