Battle of Seneffe

The Battle of Seneffe took place on 11 August 1674 near Seneffe in present-day Belgium and was one of the most notable engagements of the Franco-Dutch War. It was fought between a French army commanded by the Grand Condé and a combined Dutch, Imperial, and Spanish force led by William of Orange.

Battle of Seneffe
Part of the Franco-Dutch War
Battle of Seneffe, by Adam Frans van der Meulen
Date 11 August 1674 Location near Seneffe, Hainaut, present-day Belgium Result French victory[1]
Belligerents
France	Dutch Republic  Holy Roman Empire  Spain
Commanders and leaders
Grand Condé Luxembourg Duc de Navailles Duc d'Enghien	William of Orange Comte de Souches Prince Vaudémont Marquis d'Assentar
Strength
45,000 60 guns	65,000 70 guns
Casualties and losses
Credibly estimated at 8,000–10,000 killed or wounded[2][3]	Credibly estimated at 14,000–15,000 killed, wounded or captured [2][3]

One of only three battles in the Spanish Netherlands during the war, Seneffe was the most expensive in terms of casualties, although estimates vary considerably. After successfully repulsing the Allied assault, Condé launched a series of counter-attacks against the advice of his subordinates.

Defeat ended Allied hopes of invading Northern France, but French losses shocked Louis XIV, who thereafter focused on sieges, the dominant form of warfare in the late 17th century. Of the two other battles fought in this theatre, Cassel was an attempt to relieve Saint-Omer, while Saint-Denis was fought to prevent the fall of Mons.

Background

Both France and the Dutch Republic viewed the Spanish Netherlands as essential for their security and trade, making it a contested area throughout the 17th century. France occupied much of it in the 1667 to 1668 War of Devolution, before returning it to Spain in the 1668 Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle.[4] After this, Louis XIV decided the best way to force concessions from the Dutch was by defeating them first.[5]

When the Franco-Dutch War began in May 1672, French troops quickly over-ran much of the Netherlands, but by July, the Dutch position had stabilised. The unexpected success of this offensive encouraged Louis to make excessive demands, while concern at French gains brought the Dutch support from Brandenburg-Prussia, the Emperor Leopold, and Charles II of Spain. In August 1673, an Imperial army entered the Rhineland; facing war on multiple fronts, the French abandoned most of their earlier gains to focus on said theaters, retaining only Grave and Maastricht.[6]

In January 1674, Denmark joined the anti-French coalition, followed by the February Treaty of Westminster, which ended the Third Anglo-Dutch War.[7] In May, the French took the offensive in Franche-Comté, while Condé's army in the Spanish Netherlands remained on the defensive. A combined Dutch-Spanish force under William of Orange and Count Monterrey, Governor of the Spanish Netherlands, spent June and July attempting to bring Condé to battle. When this proved unsuccessful, William proposed taking the initiative by invading French Flanders.[8]

On 23 July, William was joined near Nivelles by an Imperial force under the Comte de Souches, a French Huguenot exile, increasing his numbers to about 65,000. At the same time, the conclusion of operations in Franche-Comté allowed substantial reinforcements to be sent to join Condé, including his son the duc d'Enghien. By early August, his army of 45,000 was entrenched along the line of the Piéton river which joined the Sambre at Charleroi.[9]

Battle

Mons

Maastricht

Seneffe

Nivelles

Liège

Brussels

Charleroi

Namur

Grave

The Seneffe campaign, 1674; key locations in the Low Countries

Concluding these positions were too strong to be attacked from the direction of Nivelles, on 9 August the Allied army established a line between the villages of Arquennes to Roux, on the French left. They hoped to tempt Condé into an attack, but he simply shifted his troops; next day, William proposed moving around Seneffe, and into the French rear.[9] This was supported by the Spanish, since it would cut Condé's supply lines and isolate the French garrison in Charleroi (see Map).[10]

At 4:00 am on 11 August, the Allies set out in three columns, each marching parallel to the French positions, a formation dictated by the poor roads. The left column was commanded by de Souches, the right by the Marquis d'Assentar, Monterrey's replacement, with the bulk of the infantry and artillery in the centre under William. A vanguard of 2,000 cavalry covered the gaps between the columns, with another 5,200 bringing up the rear led by Prince Vaudémont.[11]

Hearing the Allies were on the move, at 5:30 am Condé rode out to observe their dispositions, and quickly perceived their intentions. The terrain they were crossing was marshy and broken up by numerous hedges, walls and woods, with limited exit points; gambling these factors would negate their superior numbers, Condé decided to attack. He sent 400 light cavalry under Saint Clar to skirmish with the Allied rearguard and slow down their march, while also despatching a cavalry brigade under the Marquis de Rannes to seize the high ground north of Seneffe.[12]

Around 10:00 am, de Rannes came into contact with Vaudémont, who asked William for infantry support; he was sent three battalions, which he placed near the bridge over the Zenne or Senne river that flowed through Seneffe, with his cavalry just behind.[11] Despite gout so severe he was unable to wear riding boots, Condé himself led the elite Maison du Roi cavalry across the Zenne above Seneffe, and scattered Vaudémont's cavalry. Simultaneous assaults by de Rannes and Luxembourg overwhelmed the infantry, who were all either killed or taken prisoner.[13]

The duc d'Enghien rescues his father Condé at Seneffe

By midday, Condé had inflicted significant losses on the Allies and gained a clear, if minor victory. Instead of halting the attack, he launched a series of frontal assaults against the advice of his subordinates, and the battle became a series of confused and costly firefights, lasting until early evening.[8] After Vaudémont was driven out of Seneffe, William halted his march and formed a defensive line centred on the nearby Priory of St Nicolas, with the Marquis d'Assentar based in the hamlet of Fayt-la-Manage on his left. The Allied horse was once again driven from the field, but the French were exhausted, the Dutch infantry remained intact, and the ground in front of their position unsuitable for cavalry.[14]

Condé led one attack in person, during which he was unhorsed and had to be rescued by his son, the Duc d'Enghien. Luxembourg destroyed much of the Dutch baggage train and despite heavy losses, the French finally over-ran the Allied positions at St Nicolas in the early evening. The two armies remained where they were until daybreak, when William withdrew to Mons, and the French resumed their original positions on the Piéton.[15]

Aftermath

Although casualties on both sides were enormous, the exact total is still debated, particularly those incurred by the Allies. One reason is the relatively high numbers captured; unlike modern prisoners of war, the vast majority were exchanged almost immediately, so were not considered losses by contemporaries. French military historian De Perini puts Condé's casualties as 7,000 dead or wounded, those of the Allies as 8,000, plus 250 prisoners, although this only relates to officers.[16] Gaston Bodart, whose 1908 work on military casualties was the accepted standard for many years, estimates 10,000 French, 14,000 Allied, including 5,400 prisoners.[2] In 1970, American military analyst Trevor Dupuy provided figures that agreed with Bodart on French losses, but doubled those for the Allies.[17] Although it is not clear how this figure was generated, it has been used by others, notably Spencer Tucker.[18] In referring to the latter, Micheal Clodfelter suggests Bodart's figure of 14,000 Allied casualties is 'more likely', but places French losses slightly lower, at around 6,000.[19]

Condé's formal reception by Louis XIV at Versailles following Seneffe

In any event, they shocked the French court, one contemporary, Madame de Sévigné, writing to the Count of Bussy: ""We have lost so much by this victory that without the Te Deum and captured flags at Notre Dame, we would believe we had lost the battle".[20] While in hindsight victory ended any threat of invasion, at the time the result seemed inconclusive, and Condé thereafter sought to avoid a repeat.[21]

The Imperial troops escaped relatively untouched from the carnage at Seneffe, William claiming they had deliberately ignored requests for support. Although his overall losses were far higher, he was quickly able to rebuild his field army by taking troops from garrisons.[21] In addition, a large convoy arrived in the Allied camp outside Mons on 31 August, bringing supplies, a month's pay in advance for the survivors and five new Dutch regiments. Combined with the losses suffered by Condé, the Allied army was now stronger relative to the French than before Seneffe, and William proposed another invasion attempt.[22]

Since neither de Souches or Monterrey would agree to this, the Allies compromised by besieging Oudenarde. Operations began on 16 September, and three days later, Condé began marching to its relief. The Dutch and Spanish redoubled efforts to breach the walls before his arrival, but without advising his colleagues, de Souches sent the Imperial artillery off to Ghent. Since his troops would not fight without their guns, and the Dutch and Spanish could not face the French on their own, this forced the Allies to abandon the siege.[23]

After strong protests from the Dutch States General, de Souches was relieved of his command, but his removal did little to solve the reality of diverging objectives. De Souches was acting under instructions from Vienna, which wanted to focus on the Upper Rhine; the Spanish wanted to recoup their losses in the Spanish Netherlands, while the Dutch focused on retaking Grave and Maastricht.[24]

On 9 October, William assumed command of the siege operations at Grave, which surrendered on 28th.[25] Condé received an elaborate state reception at Versailles for Seneffe, but his health was failing and the casualties had diminished Louis' trust in his abilities. He temporarily assumed command of French troops in the Rhineland following Turenne's death at Salzbach in July 1675, but retired before the end of the year. In the longer term, Seneffe confirmed Louis' preference for positional warfare, ushering in a period where siege and manoeuvre dominated military tactics.[26]

References

1. Tucker 2009, p. 650.
2. Bodart 1908, p. 95.
3. Van Nimwegen 2010, p. 380.
4. Macintosh 1973, p. 165.
5. Lynn 1999, pp. 109-110.
6. Lynn 1999, p. 117.
7. Hutton 1989, p. 317.
8. Lynn 1999, p. 125.
9. De Périni 1896, p. 82.
10. Lynn 1999, p. 124.
11. De Hooge 1680, pp. 499-500.
12. De Périni 1896, p. 92.
13. De Hooge 1680, p. 501.
14. De Périni 1896, pp. 95-96.
15. De Périni 1896, p. 107.
16. De Perini 1896, p. 107. sfn error: no target: CITEREFDe_Perini1896 (help)
17. Dupuy & Dupuy 1970, p. 565.
18. Tucker 2009, p. 651.
19. Clodfelter 2002, p. 46.
20. De Sévigné 1822, p. 353.
21. Lynn 1999, p. 126.
22. Van Nimwegen 2010, p. 479.
23. Van Nimwegen 2010, p. 481.
24. Anonymous 1744, p. 263.
25. Jacques 2007, p. 408.
26. Lynn 1999, pp. 125-126.

Sources

• Anonymous (1744). The History of England, During the Reigns of K. William, Q. Anne and K George I, with an Introductory Review of the Reigns of the Royal Brothers Charles and James, Volume 1. Daniel Brown.
• Bodart, Gaston (1908). Militar-Historisches Kreigs-Lexikon V1: 1618-1905 (in German) (2010 ed.). Kessinger Publishing. ISBN 978-1167991554.
• Clodfelter, Micheal (2002). Warfare and Armed Conflicts: A Statistical Reference to Casualty and Other Figures 1500-1999. McFarland & Co. ISBN 978-0786412044.
• De Hooge, Romeyn (1680). The Netherland-Historian Containing a True and Exact Relation of What Hath Passed in the Late Warrs (2018 ed.). Forgotten Books. ISBN 978-0484752152.
• De Périni, Hardÿ (1896). Batailles françaises, Volume V. Ernest Flammarion.
• De Sévigné, Marie Rabutin-Chantal (1822). De St-Germain, Pierre Marie Gault (ed.). Letters of Madame De Sévigné, Volume III; to the Count de Bussy, 5 September 1674.
• Dupuy, Trevor; Dupuy, Trevor, eds. (1970). The Collins Encyclopedia of Military History: From 3500 B.C. to the Present (2007 ed.). BCA.
• Hutton, Ronald (1989). Charles II King of England, Scotland and Ireland. Clarendon Press. ISBN 978-0198229117.
• Jacques, Tony (2007). Dictionary of Battles and Sieges: A Guide to 8,500 Battles from Antiquity through the Twenty-first Century, Volume 2, F-O. Greenwood. ISBN 978-0313335389.
• Lynn, John A. (1999). The Wars of Louis XIV, 1667–1714. Addison Wesley Longman. ISBN 978-0582056299.
• Macintosh, Claude Truman (1973). French Diplomacy during the War of Devolution, the Triple Alliance and the Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle (PhD). Ohio State University.
• Tucker, Spencer C (2009). A Global Chronology of Conflict: From the Ancient World to the Modern Middle East 6V: A Global Chronology of Conflict [6 volumes]. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-1851096671.
• Van Nimwegen, Olaf (2010). The Dutch Army and the Military Revolutions, 1588–1688. Boydell Press. p. 479. ISBN 978-1843835752.