2017 WTA Finals – Doubles
Ekaterina Makarova and Elena Vesnina were the defending champions, but lost in the semifinals to Kiki Bertens and Johanna Larsson.
Doubles | |
---|---|
2017 WTA Finals | |
Champions | ![]() ![]() |
Runners-up | ![]() ![]() |
Final score | 4–6, 6–4, [10–5] |
Tímea Babos and Andrea Hlaváčková won the title, defeating Bertens and Larsson in the final, 4–6, 6–4, [10–5].
Seeds
Chan Yung-jan / Martina Hingis (Semifinals) Ekaterina Makarova / Elena Vesnina (Semifinals) Tímea Babos / Andrea Hlaváčková (Champions) Ashleigh Barty / Casey Dellacqua (Quarterfinals) Gabriela Dabrowski / Xu Yifan (Quarterfinals) Anna-Lena Grönefeld / Květa Peschke (Quarterfinals) Andreja Klepač / María José Martínez Sánchez (Quarterfinals) Kiki Bertens / Johanna Larsson (Runner-ups)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
Draw
Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||
1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||
6 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||
1 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 65 | |||||||||||||||||
3 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 77 | |||||||||||||||||
3 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||
7 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||
3 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 6 | [10] | ||||||||||||||||
8 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 4 | [5] | ||||||||||||||||
8 | ![]() ![]() | 79 | 61 | [10] | ||||||||||||||||
4 | ![]() ![]() | 67 | 77 | [6] | ||||||||||||||||
8 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||
2 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||
5 | ![]() ![]() | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||
2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||
gollark: On a related note, it annoys me a lot that Discord seem to want to appeal to "gamers"; I don't even know *which* gamers, honestly; with the weird phrasing they use in the UI.
gollark: If it was federated and open, people would be able to move off it more easily.
gollark: That would reduce their ability to data-mine this like crazy, which I assume is how they aim to monetize it eventually.
gollark: I've looked at XMPP, but I'm not sure if that works for chatroom-type things or just person/person messaging.
gollark: I would really prefer to be using some sort of open federated messaging service, but that would be more annoying for people to use I guess.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.