2017 WTA Elite Trophy – Singles

Petra Kvitová was the defending champion but failed to qualify this year.

Singles
2017 WTA Elite Trophy
Champion Julia Görges
Runner-up CoCo Vandeweghe
Final score7–5, 6–1

Julia Görges won the title, defeating CoCo Vandeweghe in the final, 7–5, 6–1.

Players

  1. Kristina Mladenovic (Round robin)
  2. CoCo Vandeweghe (Final)
  3. Sloane Stephens (Round robin)
  4. Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova (Round robin)
  5. Anastasija Sevastova (Semifinals)
  6. Elena Vesnina (Round robin)
  7. Julia Görges (Champion)
  8. Angelique Kerber (Round robin)
  9. Ashleigh Barty (Semifinals)
  10. Magdaléna Rybáriková (Round robin)
  11. Barbora Strýcová (Round robin)
  12. Peng Shuai (Round robin)

Alternates

  1. Zhang Shuai (Did not play)
  2. Duan Yingying (Did not play)

Draw

Key

Finals

Semifinals Final
          
2 CoCo Vandeweghe 6 6
9 Ashleigh Barty 3 3
2 CoCo Vandeweghe 5 1
7 Julia Görges 7 6
7 Julia Görges 6 6
5 Anastasija Sevastova 3 3

Azalea Group

Mladenovic Görges Rybáriková RR W–L Set W–L Game W–L Standings
1 Kristina Mladenovic 2–6, 6–7(4–7) 5–7, 6–1, 6–7(5–7) 0–2 1–4 (20%) 25–28 (47%) 3
7 Julia Görges 6–2, 7–6(7–4) 6–1, 7–6(7–5) 2–0 4–0 (100%) 26–15 (63%) 1
10 Magdaléna Rybáriková 7–5, 1–6, 7–6(7–5) 1–6, 6–7(5–7) 1–1 2–3 (40%) 22–30 (42%) 2

Bougainvillea Group

Vandeweghe Vesnina Peng RR W–L Set W–L Game W–L Standings
2 CoCo Vandeweghe 6–3, 6–2 3–6, 6–3, 6–2 2–0 4–1 (80%) 27–16 (63%) 1
6 Elena Vesnina 3–6, 2–6 2–6, 0–1, ret. 0–2 0–4 (0%) 5–12 (29%) 3
12/WC Peng Shuai 6–3, 3–6, 2–6 6–2, 1–0, ret. 1–1 3–2 (60%) 11–15 (42%) 2

Camellia Group

Stephens Sevastova Strýcová RR W–L Set W–L Game W–L Standings
3 Sloane Stephens 5–7, 3–6 0–5, ret. 0–2 0–4 (0%) 8–13 (38%) 3
5 Anastasija Sevastova 7–5, 6–3 6–3, 6–4 2–0 4–0 (100%) 25–15 (63%) 1
11 Barbora Strýcová 5–0, ret. 3–6, 4–6 1–1 2–2 (50%) 7–12 (37%) 2

Rose Group

Pavlyuchenkova Kerber Barty RR W–L Set W–L Game W–L Standings
4 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova 6–3, 3–6, 6–2 4–6, 1–6 1–1 2–3 (40%) 20–23 (47%) 2
8 Angelique Kerber 3–6, 6–3, 2–6 3–6, 4–6 0–2 1–4 (20%) 18–27 (40%) 3
9 Ashleigh Barty 6–4, 6–1 6–3, 6–4 2–0 4–0 (100%) 24–12 (67%) 1
gollark: That is quite something. Rust wouldn't have this issue, of course.
gollark: It's not unnecessary, just mostly unnecessary.
gollark: Given that there are no floats or negative numbers, I feel as if anything above the second derivative is unnecessary.
gollark: ... no.
gollark: The program counter is incremented by the value of the metaprogramcounter each instruction!

References

    This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.