2017 Nürnberger Versicherungscup – Doubles
Kiki Bertens and Johanna Larsson were the defending champions, but Bertens chose not to participate this year. Larsson played alongside Kirsten Flipkens, but lost in the final to Nicole Melichar and Anna Smith, 6–3, 3–6, [9–11].
Doubles | |
---|---|
2017 Nürnberger Versicherungscup | |
Champions | ![]() ![]() |
Runners-up | ![]() ![]() |
Final score | 3–6, 6–3, [11–9] |
Seeds
Sania Mirza / Yaroslava Shvedova (First round) Andreja Klepač / María José Martínez Sánchez (Semifinals) Barbora Krejčíková / Monica Niculescu (Withdrew) Raquel Atawo / Kateryna Bondarenko (First round)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
Draw
First Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | ![]() ![]() | 5 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 7 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 77 | 64 | [10] | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 3 | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 65 | 77 | [6] | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alt | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 7 | [10] | ![]() ![]() | w/o | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 5 | [12] | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 4 | [2] | ![]() ![]() | 0 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 2 | 6 | [10] | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 6 | [11] | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 3 | [9] | |||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 63 | [7] | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 7 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 5 | 77 | [10] | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | ![]() ![]() | 5 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 1 | 6 | [10] | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 65 | [10] | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 1 | [8] | |||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 77 | [8] | ![]() ![]() | 0 | 65 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 3 | [3] | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 77 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2 | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 6 | [10] |
gollark: "It has no flaws, since it doesn't have flaws"?
gollark: I see. I don't think it's just a thing of "they would agree with me if they had more information".
gollark: I didn't actually say that. I'm not sure what you're agreeing with.
gollark: No, I mean you said you would ignore metadiscussion outside it.
gollark: You could express opinions and discuss things *anyway*, see.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.