1906 Wyoming gubernatorial election
The Wyoming gubernatorial election of 1906 took place on November 6, 1906. The Republican incumbent Bryant Butler Brooks defeated the Democratic Stephen A. D. Keister with 60.20% of the vote.
![]() | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Turnout | 29.29% of Total Population ![]() | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||
![]() County Result | |||||||||||||||||
|
Elections in Wyoming | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ||||||||
|
||||||||
State government
|
||||||||
Results
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | Bryant Butler Brooks | 16,317 | 60.20% | |
Democratic | Stephen A. D. Keister | 9,444 | 34.85% | |
Socialist | William L. O'Neill | 1,236 | 4.56% | |
Independent | George W. Blain | 106 | 0.39% | |
Total votes | 27,103 | 100% |
Results by county
County | Brooks | Votes | Keister | Votes | O'Neill | Votes | Blain | Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Uinta | 59.34% | 2,259 | 28.24% | 1,075 | 12.19% | 465 | 0.24% | 9 |
Big Horn | 66.00% | 1,807 | 32.18% | 881 | 1.57% | 43 | 0.26% | 7 |
Fremont | 35.51% | 722 | 62.52% | 1,271 | 1.43% | 29 | 0.54% | 11 |
Sweetwater | 59.83% | 1,010 | 32.46% | 548 | 7.41% | 125 | 0.30% | 5 |
Sheridan | 54.92% | 1,411 | 37.02% | 951 | 7.82% | 201 | 0.23% | 6 |
Johnson | 56.54% | 666 | 42.44% | 500 | 0.93% | 11 | 0.08% | 1 |
Natrona | 63.00% | 664 | 37.00% | 390 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 |
Carbon | 65.82% | 1,579 | 30.47% | 548 | 3.50% | 84 | 0.21% | 5 |
Crook | 64.40% | 747 | 31.29% | 363 | 4.05% | 47 | 0.26% | 3 |
Weston | 70.18% | 633 | 29.16% | 263 | 0.55% | 5 | 0.11% | 1 |
Converse | 68.57% | 1,023 | 27.95% | 417 | 1.27% | 19 | 2.21% | 33 |
Albany | 57.45% | 1,342 | 32.83% | 767 | 8.73% | 204 | 0.98% | 23 |
Laramie | 65.49% | 2,454 | 34.45% | 1,287 | 0.11% | 4 | 0.05% | 2 |
gollark: ```lualUtils.drawEditBox { parent = userbox, configThing = true}```
gollark: It sounds like you should have a table.
gollark: It would be really neat if I could get signing for that working because then (well, with more work) it would be possible to distribute potatOS update manifests (and the actual code with them) securely via *any* platform!
gollark: It says "EdDSA-like digital signatures", which implies that it may not actually be something available outside of CC.
gollark: It would be neat if they were cryptographically signed too, but it turns out I have no idea what actual algorithm the potatOS ECC library is implementing, oops.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.