.pr

.pr is the Internet country code top-level domain (ccTLD) for Puerto Rico.

.pr
.pr Puerto Rico Top Level Domain
Introduced1989
TLD typeCountry code top-level domain
StatusActive
RegistryGauss Research Laboratory Inc
SponsorGauss Research Laboratory Inc
Intended useEntities connected with  Puerto Rico
Actual useFairly popular in Puerto Rico
Registration restrictionsSome subdomains have restrictions; .isla.pr is less expensive but limited to Puerto Rico residents
StructureRegistrations are at third level beneath second level labels; second-level registrations are available at higher cost
Dispute policiesUDRP
DNSSECyes
Registry websitedomains.pr/about.php

A .pr.us second-level domain has been reserved for Puerto Rico under the .us locality namespace, but it is unused. Agencies of the government of Puerto Rico use either .gov.pr or, more recently, subdomains of pr.gov, where the main government portal is located.

Domains and sub domains
  • .pr - for businesses, professionals, individuals, companies, public relations, etc.
  • .biz.pr - for businesses
  • .com.pr - for companies, but not restricted to
  • .edu.pr - for educational institutions with presence in Puerto Rico
  • .gov.pr - for agencies of the government of Puerto Rico
  • .info.pr - for informative websites
  • .isla.pr - for people with presence in Puerto Rico
  • .name.pr - for individuals
  • .net.pr - for network oriented entities, but not restricted to
  • .org.pr - for organizations, but not restricted to
  • .pro.pr - for professionals
  • .est.pr - for university students
  • .prof.pr - for university professors
  • .ac.pr - for academics
gollark: Speaking specifically about the error handling, it may be "simple", but it's only "simple" in the sense of "the compiler writers do less work". It's very easy to mess it up by forgetting the useless boilerplate line somewhere, or something like that.
gollark: Speaking more generally than the type system, Go is just really... anti-abstraction... with, well, the gimped type system, lack of much metaprogramming support, and weird special cases, and poor error handling.
gollark: - They may be working on them, but they initially claimed that they weren't necessary and they don't exist now. Also, I don't trust them to not do them wrong.- Ooookay then- Well, generics, for one: they *kind of exist* in that you can have generic maps, channels, slices, and arrays, but not anything else. Also this (https://fasterthanli.me/blog/2020/i-want-off-mr-golangs-wild-ride/), which is mostly about the file handling not being good since it tries to map on concepts which don't fit. Also channels having weird special syntax. Also `for` and `range` and `new` and `make` basically just being magic stuff which do whatever the compiler writers wanted with no consistency- see above- Because there's no generic number/comparable thing type. You would need to use `interface{}` or write a new function (with identical code) for every type you wanted to compare- You can change a signature somewhere and won't be alerted, but something else will break because the interface is no longer implemented- They are byte sequences. https://blog.golang.org/strings.- It's not. You need to put `if err != nil { return err }` everywhere.
gollark: Oh, and the error handling is terrible and it's kind of the type system's fault.
gollark: If I remember right Go strings are just byte sequences with no guarantee of being valid UTF-8, but all the functions working on them just assume they are.

See also
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.