XSM-73 Goose

The Fairchild SM-73 (originally Bull Goose) was a sub-sonic, jet-powered, ground-launched decoy cruise missile.

XSM-73 Bull Goose
XSM-73 at Launch
TypeCruise Missile
Service history
In serviceCancelled
Production history
ManufacturerFairchild
Produced1957
Specifications
Mass8,945 lb (4,057 kg) including booster
Length33 ft 6 in (10.21 m)
Height7 ft 1 in (2.16 m)
WarheadNone
Wingspan24 ft 5 in (7.44 m)
PropellantThiokol solid-propellant rocket; 50,000 lbf (222 kN) thrust for 3 seconds.
Operational
range
4,773 mi (7,681 km)
Flight ceiling50,000 ft (15,200 m)
Flight altitude50,000 ft (15,200 m) at 3,701 lb (1,679 kg) at 0.85 Mach
Maximum speed 0.85 Mach
Guidance
system
Autopilot integrated with a rate integrating gyroscope pre-programmed to turn the SM-73.
Launch
platform
Zero-length ground launcher.
XSM-73 being prepared for flight.

Development

Starting in December 1952, Fairchild began concept studies for a ground-launched long range decoy missile that could simulate strategic bombers on radar.[1]

In March 1953, the United States Air Force released General Operational Requirement (GOR) 16 which called for a long range decoy missile to increase the effectiveness of Strategic Air Command bombers by confusing and saturating an air defense system.[1][2] Multiple SM-73 missiles would be ground-launched from Strategic Air Command bases located in the continental United States. Fifty percent of the deployed SM-73 missiles would be launched within the first hour after an alert and the remaining missiles would be launched one hour later.[3] The requirement called for 85 percent of the decoy missiles to arrive at the target area within 115 nm (185 km).[3][4] The SM-73 was to fly 4,000 nm (7,408 km) at speed of at least 0.85 Mach at an operating altitude of 50,000 ft (15,240 m) with a payload of 500 lb (227 kg).[2] After flying 2,500 nm (4,650 km), the SM-73' would simulate the performance of the B-47 Stratojet or B-52 Stratofortress over the final 1,500 nm (2,780 km) of flight.[3]

Study contracts were awarded to Convair and Fairchild in July 1954 by the United States Air Force under the project designation MX-2223.

The Fairchild MX-2223 design called for a non-metallic fuselage with swept wings and a v-tail. Radar reflectors were located in the fuselage and on pods positioned on the wing tips to simulate the radar return of a bomber.

Design

In December 1955, Fairchild was awarded a contract to develop Weapon System 123A which included the SM-73 missile. American Machine and Foundry Company was responsible for the ground equipment, Ramo-Woodridge Corporation was responsible for electronic equipment, and Paul Omohundro Co who was responsible for airframe elements.

Two engine contracts were awarded by the USAF in November 1954 to minimize development risk.[5]

Each engine was in the 2,450 lbf (10.9 kN) thrust class with a thrust to weight ratio goal of 10:1. General Electric was awarded a contract for the development of the General Electric J85 and Fairchild was awarded a contract for the a competing engine the Fairchild J83. Fairchild proposed a lightweight engine of conventional design.[5]

The proposed General Electric engine had a more advanced design, involving more risk, but having a higher thrust to weight ratio. The XSM-73 was powered by the Fairchild J83 on all test flights but was also capable of using the General Electric J85. The Fairchild J83 was operating by early 1957.[5]

Like the MX-2223 design, the SM-73 utilized a non-metallic fiberglass fuselage.[3] The swept wing of the MX-2223 design evolved to a fiberglass 52°delta wing. A Thiokol solid-propellant rocket booster was used to launch the SM-73 to a speed of 300 knots (345 mph).

Cruise speed for the SM-73 was 488 knots (562 mph). The SM-73 had a fuel capacity of 803 gal (3,040 L) of JP-4. This fuel was stored in 10 fuselage and six wing tanks.[3]

An autopilot used a Rate integrating gyroscope for directional control.[1] The rate integrating gyroscope could be pre-programmed to turn the SM-73. Pitch and roll control were provided by elevons either operating in phase or asymmetrically. Yaw control was provided by a rudder.[3] The control system positioned flight controls by sending electrical signals to hydraulic actuators located at each flight control.

The SM-73 was designed to carry radar reflectors and active electronic countermeasures operating in S-band, L-band, and lower frequencies.[3] The SM-73 was not armed.

Funding issues and problems with the fiberglass wing, the booster rocket, and the Fairchild J83 engine delayed testing.[1]

Test and evaluation began in February 1957 with rocket sled tests at Holloman Air Force Base.[2] A B-57 Canberra was modified and used as a flying engine testbed for the Fairchild J83.[5] Testing of the SM-73 then transitioned to Patrick Air Force Base in June 1957. At Patrick Air Force Base, launch complexes 21[6] and 22[7] were constructed near the Cape Canaveral Light[6] to support SM-73 testing. Five dummy booster launches and fifteen test flights were flown between March 1957 and December 1958.[6]

The United States Air Force planned to purchase 2,328 operational missiles and 53 missiles for test and evaluation.[2] This would have provided enough missiles for 10 squadrons.[2] Deployment was planned to start in 1961 and be completed by October 1963.[2] Bull Goose bases were initially planned at Duluth Municipal Airport, Minnesota and Ethan Allen Air Force Base, Vermont.[8] Construction of Bull Goose missile sites began in August 1958.[2]

In December 1958 the program was canceled because the missile was not able to simulate a B-52 on radar.[2] The Fairchild J83 engine program was also canceled in November 1958.[5] Total program cost at cancellation was $136.5 million USD.

The SD-5 Osprey reconnaissance drone was developed with the Goose as a basis.[9]

Variants
B-73
Original designation in Bomber sequence
XSM-73
Test and Evaluation prototypes.
SM-73
Production Missile designation.
Gander
Proposed surface-to-surface version capable of carrying a 1 Mt warhead 2,000 miles (3,200 km).[10]

Operator

Survivors
gollark: I think the Radeon RX 5700 (NOT the much older 5700 series HD ones) is *fairly* perf-comparable to the Vega 64, and they seem to be similar prices in Australia.
gollark: I think the AMD Vega cards have been replaced by the Navi ones now, which got released on Sunday.
gollark: *Tronzoid brings up a random vaguely political topic nobody asked about, again*
gollark: There are probably a bunch of different implementations in use, and possibly meta-repnets for weighting each repnet.
gollark: Don't they *use* some?

See also

Aircraft of comparable role, configuration and era

Related lists

References

Citations
  1. SM-73, Directory of U.S. Military Rockets and Missiles - Appendix 1: Early Missiles and Drones, by Andreas Parsch , retrieved November 10, 2007.
  2. SM-73 Bull Goose, 1997 Web Page by the Federation of American Scientists, , retrieved November 10, 2007.
  3. Fairchild B-73 Bull Goose, Fact Sheet from the National Museum of the USAF, "Archived copy". Archived from the original on August 6, 2009. Retrieved September 24, 2007.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link), Retrieved on November 10, 2007.
  4. Historical Essay by Andreas Parsch, Goose, "Archived copy". Archived from the original on October 19, 2007. Retrieved September 24, 2007.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link), retrieved on November 10, 2007.
  5. The History of North American Small Gas Turbine Aircraft Engines, William Fleming and Richard Leyes, AIAA, 1999
  6. Encyclopedia Astronautica, Cape Canaveral LC21, "Archived copy". Archived from the original on July 6, 2008. Retrieved June 19, 2009.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) retrieved November 10, 2007.
  7. Encyclopedia Astronautica, Cape Canaveral LC22, "Archived copy". Archived from the original on July 6, 2008. Retrieved June 19, 2009.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) retrieved November 10, 2007.
  8. GOOSE (BULL GOOSE) Fact Sheet, Cliff Lethbridge, Spaceline Website, "Archived copy". Archived from the original on June 10, 2007. Retrieved September 24, 2007.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link), retrieved November 10, 2007.
  9. Newcome 2004, p.75.
  10. "Surface-to-Surface: Aerodynamic Cruise". Flight. 74 (2602): 881. 5 December 1958.
  11. List of Hagerstown Aviation Museum Aircraft, "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-03. Retrieved 2017-01-23.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link), retrieved November 10, 2007

Bibliography
  • Newcome, Lawrence R. (2004). Unmanned Aviation: A Brief History of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Reston, Virginia: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. ISBN 978-1-56347-644-0.
  • Evolution of the Cruise Missile, Kenneth P. Warrell, Air University Press USAF, 1985.
  • IDEAS, CONCEPTS, DOCTRINE, Basic Thinking of the United States Air Force 1907-1960, Vol 1, Robert Frank Futrell, Air University Press, 1989
  • Interavia, International Aeronautic Federation, 1992.
  • SM-73 Bull Goose, Web Page of Global Security.org
  • Technology and the Air Force A retrospective Assessment Air Force History and Museums Program, United States Air Force, 1997
  • The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Rockets and Missiles, Bill Gunston, Salamander Books Ltd, 1979

Further reading
  • Bridgman, Leonard, ed. (1958). Jane's All the World's Aircraft 1958-59. London: Jane's All the World's Aircraft Publishing Co. Ltd. p. 303.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.