Uralite Halt railway station
Uralite Halt (TQ 702 737 51°26′12″N 0°26′59″E) was a halt between Milton Range Halt and Cliffe station on the Hundred of Hoo Railway. Built to serve the British Uralite works, it opened in July 1906 and closed on 4 December 1961.[1] The halt was demolished soon after closure.
Preceding station | Disused railways | Following station | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Milton Range Halt | 7/1906 to 31-12-1922 SECR Hundred of Hoo Railway |
Cliffe station | ||
Milton Range Halt | 1-1-1923 to 16-9-1932 SR Hundred of Hoo Railway |
Cliffe station | ||
Denton Halt | 17-9-1932 to 31-12-1947 SR Hundred of Hoo Railway |
Cliffe station | ||
Denton Halt | 1-1-1948 to 1956 BR(S) Hundred of Hoo Railway |
Cliffe station | ||
Hoo Junction Staff Halt | 1956 to 3-12-1961 BR(S) Hundred of Hoo Railway |
Cliffe station |
Uralite Halt | |
---|---|
Location | |
Place | Higham |
Area | Gravesham |
Grid reference | TQ702737 |
Operations | |
Pre-grouping | South Eastern & Chatham Railway |
Post-grouping | Southern Railway Southern Region of British Railways |
Platforms | 1 |
History | |
July 1906 | Opened |
4 December 1961 | Closed |
Disused railway stations in the United Kingdom | |
Closed railway stations in Britain A B C D–F G H–J K–L M–O P–R S T–V W–Z |
References.
- Southern Railway Halts, p57.
Sources.
- Kidner, R. W. (1985). Southern Railway Halts. Survey and Gazetteer. Headington, Oxford: The Oakwood Press. ISBN 0-85361-321-4.
gollark: H.266 recently got standardized, which could be cool if they don't bee the licensing like with H.265, as it's faster to encode than AV1 but has greater bitrate savings.
gollark: However, it has about 10x worse encoding speed, and the encoders are not hugely production-ready, so use is basically limited to giant interweb companies.
gollark: AV1 is better from a licensing perspective, and more bitrate-efficient than H.265.
gollark: Like how even though H.265 is better than H.264 in basically every way, half the internet is stuck on H.264 because ??? licensing ????? Chromium.
gollark: Anyway, obviously the round earth is a superior technical solution, but you can bodge the flat-earth thing into *kind of* working and the patent issues make it much cheaper.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.