USS LST-544

USS LST-544 was a United States Navy LST-542-class tank landing ship in commission from 1944 to 1946.

USS LST-544, at left, moored at United States Naval Magazine, Indian Island, Washington, with smoke from the Port Townsend, Washington, paper mill in the background.
History
United States
Name: USS LST-544
Builder: Missouri Valley Bridge and Iron Company, Evansville, Indiana
Laid down: 8 December 1943
Launched: 4 February 1944
Sponsored by: Mrs. Maudie M. Marlow
Commissioned: 16 March 1944
Decommissioned: 9 August 1946
Stricken: 25 September 1946
Fate: Sold for scrapping 23 June 1947
General characteristics
Class and type: LST-542-class tank landing ship
Displacement:
  • 1,625 long tons (1,651 t) light
  • 4,080 long tons (4,145 t) full (seagoing draft with 1,675-ton load
Length: 328 ft (100 m)
Beam: 50 ft (15 m)
Draft:
  • Unloaded 2 ft 4 in (0.71 m) forward; 7 ft 6 in (2.29 m) aft
  • Full load: 8 ft 2 in (2.49 m) forward; 14 ft 1 in (4.29 m) aft
  • Landing with 500-ton load: 3 ft 11 in (1.19 m) forward; 9 ft 10 in (3.00 m) aft
Propulsion: Two diesel engines, two shafts, twin rudders
Speed: 12 knots (22 km/h; 14 mph)
Range: 24,000 nautical miles (44,448 kilometerss) at 9 knots while displacing 3,960 tons
Boats & landing
craft carried:		 6 x LCVPs
Capacity: 1,600-1,900 tons cargo depending on mission
Troops: 14 officers, 131 enlisted men
Complement: 9 officers, 120 enlisted men
Armament:
  • 2 × twin 40 mm gun mounts
  • 4 × single 40-millimeter gun mounts
  • 12 × 20 mm guns

Construction and commissioning

LST-544 was laid down on 8 December 1943 at Evansville, Indiana, by the Missouri Valley Bridge and Iron Company. She was launched on 4 February 1944, sponsored by Mrs. Maudie M. Marlow, and commissioned on 16 March 1944.

Service history

LST-544 was not involved in combat operations during World War II.

Decommissioning and disposal

LST-544 was decommissioned on 9 August 1946 and stricken from the Navy List on 25 September 1946. On 23 June 1947, she was sold to Willamette Iron & Steel Company for scrapping.

gollark: > do people have these problems in other countries?In the UK, we have *different* problems.
gollark: Meh, I turn that off anyway because it seems to be more "Microsoft-approved boot" than *secure* boot. Unless you bother to set your own keys, I guess.
gollark: No, I did, several times.> The data/body can be large, contain arbitrary bytes, and is actually meant to store large amounts of data.> - servers may allocate limited-sized buffers for incoming request headers so you can't put too much in them (this is somewhat problematic for cookies)> request bodies can probably be handled more performantly because of stuff like the length field on them> - request bodies are generated by forms and all sane clients so stuff is mostly designed to deal with those
gollark: I did say multiple times why that's not really a good idea.
gollark: You can put large amounts of data in the body. That's what it's for. File uploads and stuff go in it.

References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.