The Monk and the Woman

The Monk and the Woman is a 1917 Australian silent film directed by Franklyn Barrett. It is considered to be lost.[4]

The Monk and the Woman
Directed byFranklyn Barrett
Produced byFranklyn Barrett
George Marlow
Harry Musgrove
Written byFranklyn Barrett
D.H. Souter (titles)[1]
Based onplay by Frederick Melville
CinematographyFranklyn Barrett
Production
company
Australian Famous Players
Release date
8 October 1917[2]
Running time
6,000 feet
CountryAustralia
LanguageSilent film
English intertitles
Budget£1,000[3]

Plot

In eighteenth century France, the evil Prince de Montrale (Harry Plimmer) falls in love with Liane (Maud Fane), but she runs away from him and seeks refuge in a monastery. The prince finds her and orders the abbott to keep her in custody. A young novice, Brother Paul (Percy Marmont), is placed in charge of Liane and falls in love with her, despite having just taken his vows of celibacy.

The king (Monte Luke) commands that Liane marry the Prince. A wedding is prepared but Paul defeats the prince in a duel, steals his cloak and takes his place at the wedding. The impersonation is discovered and Paul is taken away to be executed. De Montrale leads a revolt against the king but Paul keeps fight off the attack until loyalists arrive. Paul then returns to the monastery forever.[5]

Cast
  • Maud Fane as Countess Liane
  • Percy Marmont as Brother Paul
  • Harry Plimmer as Prince de Montrale
  • Monte Luke as the king
  • Alma Rock Phillips as de Vernet
  • Ruth Wainwright as Mme de Vigne, the king's favourite
  • Hugh Huntley as Armande
  • Charles Beetham
  • George Young
  • Mattie Ive as page boy

Original play

The play was first produced in England in 1912 where it ran for a year. Theatre entrepreneur George Marlow bought the Australian rights and presented it in 1912.[6] It was controversial and received protests from church groups, being condemned by the Australian Catholic Federation.[7][8]

The film version changed the ending so that Brother Paul renounced his loved one and returned to the monastery, whereas in the play the two lovers stayed together.[3]

Production

The film adaptation was likely made in response to the 1917 film The Church and the Woman. Shooting began in August 1917 and took place on the stage of the Theatre Royal in Sydney, and on location in French's Forest, Sydney, with some additional scenes shot at W.D. Dailey's castle in Manly.[1][9][10]

Percy Marmont, Hugh Huntley and Maud Fane were all British stage stars then touring Australia; this was Marmont's film debut.[11][12] It was produced by noted stage actor George Marlow.[13]

Release

Despite changing the ending, the film was still seen as controversial by the Catholic Federation, who objected to its depiction of Catholicism. However, it was still passed by the censor.[14] Advertisements heavily played up the controversy[15] and the movie was a major success at the box office.[3][16] It was still screening in cinemas in 1922.[17][18]

Critical

In the words of the Sunday Times "costume plays are notoriously at once difficult and expensive of production, and the utmost care must be exercised in order to escape anachronism. In this direction the pitfalls seem to have been avoided in the skilled hands o£ Mr W. Franklyn Barrett, who adapted the play to photography and produced; of Mr. D. H. Souter, who is responsible for the artistic titles; and of Mr. Rock Phillips, who undertook the art production."[1]

George Marlow sued the makers of The Church and the Woman (1917) and got a court injunction forcing the producers of the latter to advertise their film specifically saying it was different from The Monk and the Woman.[19] This was done.[20]

gollark: Oh APIOFORMS, firecubez knows about the highly fast bees.
gollark: I typed this with my eyes closed and it came out surprisingly not wrongly.
gollark: Wow, that was actually *right*?
gollark: You know what they say, bees approach you at 87THz and you cannot possibly hope to escape, due to the unlimited power of typing .
gollark: Ah, touch typing.

See also

References
  1. "BIG FILMS IN REVIEW". The Sunday Times. Sydney. 7 October 1917. p. 26. Retrieved 10 December 2014 – via National Library of Australia.
  2. "Advertising". The Sydney Morning Herald. 8 October 1917. p. 3. Retrieved 24 April 2012 – via National Library of Australia.
  3. Andrew Pike and Ross Cooper, Australian Film 1900–1977: A Guide to Feature Film Production, Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1998, 71
  4. "The Monk and the Woman". silentera.com. Retrieved 5 March 2013.
  5. "THE MONK AND THE WOMAN". The Mail. Adelaide. 20 October 1917. p. 8. Retrieved 24 April 2012 – via National Library of Australia.
  6. "MELODRAMA AND ITS MISSION". The West Australian. Perth. 6 September 1912. p. 4. Retrieved 24 April 2012 – via National Library of Australia.
  7. "CONDEMNING A PLAY". The Sydney Morning Herald. 13 January 1913. p. 10. Retrieved 24 April 2012 – via National Library of Australia.
  8. "AUSTRALIAN CATHOLIC FEDERATION". The Register. Adelaide. 10 May 1913. p. 6. Retrieved 24 April 2012 – via National Library of Australia.
  9. "History Repeats Itself". The World's News. Sydney. 13 October 1917. p. 5. Retrieved 10 December 2014 – via National Library of Australia.
  10. "MAJESTIC THEATRE". Table Talk. Melbourne. 1 November 1917. p. 30. Retrieved 10 December 2014 – via National Library of Australia.
  11. "PARAMOUNT PICTURES". The Mercury. Hobart, Tasmania. 15 March 1927. p. 5. Retrieved 24 April 2012 – via National Library of Australia.
  12. "It All Began With a Feature Movie On The Kelly Gang". The News. Adelaide. 16 November 1946. p. 2. Retrieved 20 February 2014 – via National Library of Australia.
  13. "Marlow Again in Entertainment Field". Everyones. 24 March 1928. p. 3.
  14. "MONK AND THE WOMAN". The Sunday Times. Sydney. 7 October 1917. p. 25. Retrieved 10 December 2014 – via National Library of Australia.
  15. "Advertising". The Sydney Morning Herald. 12 October 1917. p. 3. Retrieved 24 April 2012 – via National Library of Australia.
  16. "THE MOVING PICTURE WORLD". Bendigo Advertiser. Vic. 17 October 1917. p. 4. Retrieved 10 December 2014 – via National Library of Australia.
  17. "ENTERTAINMENTS". The Brisbane Courier. 18 August 1922. p. 9. Retrieved 10 December 2014 – via National Library of Australia.
  18. http://lantern.mediahist.org/catalog/moving34chal_0283
  19. "IN EQUITY". The Sydney Morning Herald. 13 October 1917. p. 9. Retrieved 24 April 2012 – via National Library of Australia.
  20. "Advertising". The Mail. Adelaide. 20 October 1917. p. 8. Retrieved 24 April 2012 – via National Library of Australia.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.