SS Queen Cristina (1901)

Queen Cristina was a steam cargo ship built in 1901 by the Northumberland Shipbuilding Co of Newcastle for Thomas Dunlop & Sons of Glasgow. The ship was designed and built for general cargo trade and spent her career doing tramp trade. She was the second ship named Queen Cristina in service with the Queen Line.

History
United Kingdom
Name: Queen Cristina
Namesake: Queen Cristina
Owner: Thomas Dunlop & Sons
Operator: Dunlop Steamship Co Ltd
Builder: Northumberland Shipbuilding Co, Howdon
Yard number: 89
Launched: 6 March 1901
Commissioned: 20 July 1901
Homeport: Glasgow
Identification:
Fate: Wrecked, 21 October 1907
General characteristics
Type: Cargo Ship
Tonnage:
Length: 360 ft 0 in (109.73 m)
Beam: 48 ft 0 in (14.63 m)
Depth: 20 ft 2 in (6.15 m)
Installed power: 341 Nhp[1]
Propulsion: North Eastern Marine Engineering Co 3-cylinder triple expansion
Speed: 10.0 knots (11.5 mph; 18.5 km/h)

Design and Construction

After the first steamship Queen Cristina wrecked on Great Barrier Reef in 1899, Thomas Dunlop & Sons, owners of the Queen Line, ordered a new, bigger vessel to continue their Oriental trade. The vessel was laid down at Northumberland Shipbuilding Co. shipyard in Howdon and launched on 6 March 1901 (yard number 89),[2][3] and after successful completion of sea trials on July 20, during which the ship could easily attain speed of 11.5 knots (13.2 mph; 21.3 km/h), Queen Cristina was handed over to her owners and sailed for New York.[4] The vessel was built with a view to speed and fuel economy, and was primarily intended for general cargo trade, with several steam winches, and large number of cargo derricks installed to facilitate quick cargo loading and unloading process. In addition, the 'tween decks were designed to accommodate a large number of emigrants, troops or cattle in case of need.[4]

As built, the ship was 360 feet 0 inches (109.73 m) long (between perpendiculars) and 48 feet 0 inches (14.63 m) abeam, a mean draft of 20 feet 2 inches (6.15 m).[1] Queen Cristina was assessed at 4,268 GRT and 2,804 NRT and had deadweight of approximately 7,000.[1] The vessel had a steel hull, and a single 341 nhp triple-expansion steam engine, with cylinders of 23 1⁄2-inch (60 cm), 39-inch (99 cm) and 66-inch (170 cm) diameter with a 45-inch (110 cm) stroke, that drove a single screw propeller, and moved the ship at up to 10.0 knots (11.5 mph; 18.5 km/h).[1]

Operational history

As soon as the ship was transferred to her owners, she departed in ballast for New York. There she loaded 162,424 cases of petroleum and sailed out for Shanghai via Colombo on August 29, 1901 and reached her destination on November 9.[5][6][7] From China the steamer proceeded to Japan where she loaded coal and delivered her cargo to Singapore on December 7, 1901. The ship left Singapore on December 26 for Calcutta to load a cargo of jute and departed from India on January 25, 1902 for her return trip to the United States, reaching New York on March 15, 1902. The vessel then loaded approximately 165,000 cases of petroleum and left New York on April 19 for Yokohama. From Japan the vessel sailed on July 26 to Sourabaya where she was consigned to carry sugar back to the United States for the American Sugar Refining Company.[8] Upon loading, the vessel departed Java on August 29 for her return voyage.[9] On September 28 Queen Cristina arrived at Port Said with a damaged rudder and had to undergo repairs before continuing her trip three days later, arriving at New York on November 5 via Philadelphia.[10]

Queen Cristina was subsequently chartered by the American & Australian Line to deliver general cargo to Australia, and departed New York on December 19, 1902.[11] The ship called for coaling at St. Vincent and arrived at Adelaide on February 17, 1903, and from there continued to Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane to unload her cargo, which consisted of a variety of items, including machinery, agricultural machinery, wire etc.[12] Next, she was chartered to transport coal and sailed to Newcastle for loading. The vessel loaded 7,251 tons total (5,940 as cargo) of coal and sailed on March 20 for Manila arriving there on April 13. The ship continued to Java to load a cargo of sugar and arrived in Philadelphia on August 27.

During the rest of 1903 through August 1905 Queen Cristina made several trips to Southeast Asia from New York and Philadelphia carrying case oil and general cargo on her forward trips and returning with sugar and other agricultural products.

On September 12, 1905 the vessel arrived at Savannah from Philadelphia to load a cargo of cotton for Havre and Baltic ports in Germany, Sweden and Russia. The ship loaded 9,347 bales of cotton and left Savannah on September 23 arriving in Europe one month later.[13] After unloading her cargo, she sailed back to the United States on November 23 from Hamburg via Barry and arrived at Pensacola on December 24, 1905.[14] She departed Pensacola in ballast on January 17, and arrived next day in New Orleans. There, the steamer took on board 200,915 bushels of corn in addition to cotton, lumber and foodstuffs and departed for Hull on February 7, 1906.[15] The ship arrived at her destination on March 6.[16]

Subsequently the vessel sailed for Calcutta via Torrevieja and arrived at Port Said on May 21. On May 22, while proceeding down the Suez Canal, Queen Cristina struck an anchored steamer SS Trafford Hall. The damage to both vessels was light, and Queen Cristina could continue her journey.[17] Upon arrival at Calcutta she loaded 6,550 tons of manganese ore and left on August 18 for Baltimore. After an uneventful journey the ship arrived at her destination on October 4, bringing on board also two Cingalese young women to matriculate at the Folt Missionary College.[18]

From Baltimore the steamer sailed for loading to Savannah. there she loaded 6,200 bales of cotton and departed on November 6 for Bremen via Norfolk and reached it on November 28.[19] Afterward the ship sailed to Rotterdam to load cargo for transportation to Chile via the ports on the west coast of South America, and departed for her voyage on January 6, 1907. After a long journey, the ship arrived at Antofagasta. Next, the ship was chartered by the "Commonwealth Line" for a period of 12 months to conduct trade between Australia and North America. Queen Cristina departed Antofagasta on June 6, stopped at Coronel and sailed for Australia on June 22, 1907. During her trip, the ship encountered some very rough weather, running into several gales, and had to put in at Auckland on August 5 short of coal.[20][21] After refilling her bunkers, Queen Cristina left Auckland on August 10 bound for Sydney and reached it on August 18. There she was cleaned and painted on August 20 and then proceeded to Newcastle and arrived there on August 24 to refill her bunkers. Next, she returned to Sydney to take mails and load 5,100 tons of coal, and left on September 4 for San Francisco.[22] the ship anchored at her destination on October 8 and upon unloading was immediately chartered to deliver grain from Portland to Europe.

Sinking

Queen Cristina sailed from San Francisco in ballast at 20:20 on October 19, 1907 bound for Portland to load wheat for delivery to Europe. The ship was under command of captain George R. Harris and had a crew of 31 men. After dropping off a pilot off the lightship, she took a northwestern course. After passing Cape Mendocino, the course was set for keeping about eight miles off St. George Reef Light, going at 8 knots. During the night of October 20 - early morning October 21, the vessel encountered heavy fog, and the steamer changed her course to a more northerly one while south of Crescent City. A strong current present near the coast carried the ship closer to the shore and at around 01:40 on October 21 Queen Cristina struck on North Seal Rock, about eight miles northwest of Crescent City, close to a place where another steamer, Brother Jonathan, foundered earlier. The ship started to take on water immediately, and captain Harris ordered to lower the lifeboats and 16 men were able to board them around 07:30 and row towards Crescent City to seek help, reaching it at around 10:45.

Queen Cristina's wreck shortly before sinking

The rest of the crew and the captain remained on board the ship. The pumps were kept going until around 10:00 when the rising water in the hold extinguished the fires. As the water reached between the decks, everyone remaining was forced to abandon ship at 12:30 and were subsequently found and picked up from the lifeboats by the steamer Navarro which sailed from Crescent City upon hearing the news of the disaster.[23] The captain and the crew stayed in Crescent City for about a week and were brought down to San Francisco by two steam schooners, Mandalay and Del Norte on November 1.[24]

An investigation held at the British Consulate in San Francisco found that the vessel's compass developed a discrepancy of 14 degrees prior to departure, but given the adjustments made by the crew, the court decided this to be of no consequence. The court found that between 20:00 on October 20 and the time of grounding, no attempt was made to verify the course of the vessel or measure depth despite the presence of the thick fog. Both the captain and the second mate were censured but did not lose their licenses.[25]

The ship went aground at a place where she was surrounded by many submerged rocks and it was impossible to reach her, and the vessel was abandoned and declared a total wreck. Even though the wreck was in an exposed position open to southern and southwestern storms, Queen Cristina managed to survive the winter of 1907-08 and finally was broken and sunk in January 1909.

Notes
  1. Lloyd's Register, Steamships and Motorships. London: Lloyd's Register. 1902–1903.CS1 maint: date format (link)
  2. "Tyne Built Ships: Queen Cristina". Retrieved August 18, 2018.
  3. "Queen Cristina (1113966)". Miramar Ship Index. Retrieved 18 August 2018.
  4. "Trial Trips". The Marine Engineer. XXIII. 1 August 1901. p. 197.
  5. "News of the Shipping". Baltimore Sun. 30 August 1901. p. 9.
  6. "Reports from Oil Centres". The Petroleum Industrial & Technical Review. 5 (132). 14 September 1901. p. 26.
  7. "Shipping and Foreign Mails". The New York Times. 10 November 1901. p. 20.
  8. "Clyde Shipping Gazette". The Greenock Telegraph and Clyde Shipping Gazette. 29 July 1902. p. 4.
  9. "Shipping Intelligence". The Scotsman. 1 September 1902. p. 3.
  10. "Mercantile Shipping News". London Standard. 1 October 1902. p. 8.
  11. "Shipping and Foreign Mails". The New York Times. 19 December 1902. p. 11.
  12. "Imports". The Sydney Morning Herald. 4 March 1903. p. 8. Retrieved August 21, 2018 – via Newspapers.com.
  13. "Shipping News". The Commercial & Financial Chronicle. 81 (2101). 30 September 1905. p. 1056.
  14. "Shipping News". The Pensacola Journal. 24 December 1905. p. 8.
  15. "Marine News". The Times-Democrat. 8 February 1906. p. 15. Retrieved August 22, 2018 – via Newspapers.com.
  16. "Steamship Movements". London Standard. 8 March 1906. p. 3.
  17. "Disasters and Marine Notes". London Standard. 23 May 1906. p. 3.
  18. "News of the Shipping". Baltimore Sun. 5 October 1906. p. 12. Retrieved August 22, 2018 – via Newspapers.com.
  19. "Shipping News". The Commercial & Financial Chronicle. 83 (2159). 10 November 1906. p. 1182.
  20. "Vessels in Difficulties". The West Australian. 6 August 1907. p. 5.
  21. "Queen Christina Puts into Auckland". The Daily Telegraph. 17 August 1907. p. 21.
  22. "Coal Shipments from Sydney". Daily Commercial News and Shipping List. 27 September 1907. p. 3.
  23. "Lost on Rocks off Del Norte Coast". San Francisco Chronicle. 22 October 1907. p. 3. Retrieved August 23, 2018 – via Newspapers.com.
  24. "Wreck Victims Arrive". Los Angeles Times. 2 November 1907. p. 3. Retrieved August 23, 2018 – via Newspapers.com.
  25. "Navigators Let Off with Slight Reprimand". The San Francisco Call. 15 November 1907. p. 7. Retrieved August 23, 2018 – via Newspapers.com.
gollark: So you can't eat the bag, you have to pass the bag into a bag unbagger.
gollark: Consider the idea of zygohistomorphic prepromorphisms.
gollark: Monads are just applicatives with `bind` or `join`.
gollark: Well, the IO monad is just a cleaner way to pass around a value and the state of the entire real world.
gollark: Monads are basically just burritos enclosing data and some other state.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.