Reference Daily Intake

The Reference Daily Intake (RDI) used in nutrition labeling on food and dietary supplement products in the U.S. and Canada is the daily intake level of a nutrient that is considered to be sufficient to meet the requirements of 97–98% of healthy individuals in every demographic in the United States. While developed for the US population, it has been adopted by other countries, though not universally.

The RDI is used to determine the Daily Value (DV) of foods, which is printed on nutrition facts labels (as % DV) in the United States and Canada, and is regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and by Health Canada. The labels "high", "rich in", or "excellent source of" may be used for a food if it contains 20% or more of the RDI. The labels "good source", "contains", or "provides" may be used on a food if it contains between 10% and 20% of the RDI.[1]

The Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDAs) were a set of nutrition recommendations that evolved into both the Dietary Reference Intake (DRI) system of nutrition recommendations (which still defines RDA values) and the RDIs used for food labeling. The first regulations governing U.S. nutrition labels specified a % U.S. RDA declaration based on the current RDA values, which had been published in 1968. Later, the % U.S. RDA was renamed the %DV and the RDA values that the %DVs were based on became the RDIs.

The RDAs (and later the RDA values within the DRI) were regularly revised to reflect the latest scientific information, but although the nutrition labeling regulations were occasionally updated, the existing RDI values were not changed, so that until 2016, many of the DVs used on nutrition facts labels were still based on the outdated RDAs from 1968. In 2016, the Food and Drug Administration published changes to the regulations including updated RDIs and DVs based primarily on the RDAs in the current DRI.

Food labeling reference tables

Daily Values used by the FDA for the following macronutrients are Daily Reference Values.[2][3]

The FDA issued a final rule on changes to the facts panel on May 27, 2016.[4] The new values were published in the Federal Register.[5] The original deadline to be in compliance was July 28, 2018, but on May 4, 2018, the FDA released a final rule that extended the deadline to January 1, 2020, for manufacturers with $10 million or more in annual food sales, and by January 1, 2021, for manufacturers with less than $10 million in annual food sales.[6][7][8] During the first six months following the January 1, 2020 compliance date, the FDA plans to work cooperatively with manufacturers to meet the new Nutrition Facts label requirements and will not focus on enforcement actions regarding these requirements during that time.[6] In the interim, products containing old or new facts panel content may be on market shelves at the same time.

The following table lists the old and new DVs based on a caloric intake of 2000 kcal (8400 kJ), for adults and children four or more years of age.[9][10]

Nutrient DV
Total fat 65 g increased to 78 g [11]
Saturated fatty acids 20 g stays unchanged
Cholesterol 300 mg stays unchanged
Sodium 2400 mg decreased to 2300 mg
Potassium 3500 mg increased to 4700 mg
Total carbohydrate 300 g decreased to 275 g
Added sugars newly established at 50 g
Dietary fiber 25 g increased to 28 g
Protein 50 g stays unchanged

For vitamins and minerals, the old RDIs and new RDIs (old and new adult 100% Daily Values) are given in the following table, along with the more recent RDAs or AIs (marked with an asterisk) of the Dietary Reference Intakes (maximized over sex and age groups, excluding women who are pregnant or lactating):[4][9][10]

Nutrient Old RDI New RDI or AI
(male, age 19–30) (female, age 19–30)
Vitamin A900 μg900 μg 700 μg
Ascorbic acid (vitamin C)60 mg90 mg 75 mg
Cholecalciferol (vitamin D)400 IU (10 μg)20 μg 20 μg
Tocopherol (vitamin E)30 IU15 mg 15 mg
Vitamin K80 μg120 μg 90 μg
Thiamin (vitamin B1)1.5 mg1.2 mg 1.1 mg
Riboflavin (vitamin B2)1.7 mg1.3 mg 1.1 mg
Niacin (vitamin B3)20 mg16 mg 14 mg
Pyridoxine (vitamin B6)2 mg1.7 mg 1.7 mg
Folate400 μg400 μg 400 μg
Cobalamine (vitamin B12)6 μg2.4 μg 2.4 μg
Pantothenic acid (vitamin B5)10 mg5 mg 5 mg
Biotin300 μg30 μg 30 μg
Choline—550 mg 425 mg
Calcium1000 mg1300 mg 1300 mg
Chromium120 μg35 μg* 25 μg*
Copper2000 μg900 μg 900 μg
Fluoride 4 mg* 3 mg*
Iodine150 μg150 μg 150 μg
Iron18 mg18 mg 18 mg
Magnesium400 mg400 mg 310 mg
Manganese2 mg2.3 mg* 1.8 mg*
Molybdenum75 μg45 μg 45 μg
Phosphorus1000 mg700 mg 700 mg
Selenium70 μg55 μg 55 μg
Zinc15 mg11 mg 8 mg
Potassium 4.7 g 4.7 g
Sodium 1.5 g* 1.5 g*
Chloride3400 mg2.3 g* 2.3 g*

History

The RDI is derived from the RDAs, which were first developed during World War II by Lydia J. Roberts, Hazel Stiebeling and Helen S. Mitchell, all part of a committee established by the U.S. National Academy of Sciences to investigate issues of nutrition that might "affect national defense" (Nestle, 35). The committee was renamed the Food and Nutrition Board in 1941, after which they began to deliberate on a set of recommendations of a standard daily allowance for each type of nutrient. The standards would be used for nutrition recommendations for the armed forces, for civilians, and for overseas population who might need food relief. Roberts, Stiebeling, and Mitchell surveyed all available data, created a tentative set of allowances for "energy and eight nutrients", and submitted them to experts for review (Nestle, 35). The final set of guidelines, called RDAs for Recommended Dietary Allowances, were accepted in 1941. The allowances were meant to provide superior nutrition for civilians and military personnel, so they included a "margin of safety". Because of food rationing during the war, the food guides created by government agencies to direct citizens' nutritional intake also took food availability into account.

The Food and Nutrition Board subsequently revised the RDAs every five to ten years. In 1973, the FDA introduced regulations to specify the format of nutrition labels when present, although the inclusion of such labels was largely voluntary, only being required if nutrition claims were made or if nutritional supplements were added to the food. The nutrition labels were to include percent U.S. RDA based on the 1968 RDAs in effect at the time. The RDAs continued to be updated (in 1974, 1980 and 1989) but the values specified for nutrition labeling remained unchanged.[12]

In 1993 the FDA published new regulations mandating the inclusion of a nutrition facts label on most packaged foods. Originally the FDA had proposed replacing the percent U.S. RDAs with percent daily values based on the 1989 RDAs but the Dietary Supplement Act of 1992 prevented it from doing so. Instead it introduced the RDI to be the basis of the new daily values. The RDI consisted of the existing U.S. RDA values (still based on the 1968 RDAs as the FDA was not allowed to change them at the time) and new values for additional nutrients not included in the 1968 RDAs.[12]

In 1997, at the suggestion of the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy, the RDAs became one part of a broader set of dietary guidelines called the Dietary Reference Intake used by both the United States and Canada. As part of the DRI, the RDAs continued to be updated.

On May 27, 2016, the FDA updated the regulations to change the RDI and Daily Values to reflect current scientific information.[4][5] Until this time, the Daily Values were still largely based on the 1968 RDAs. The new regulations make several other changes to the nutrition facts label to facilitate consumer understanding of the calorie and nutrient contents of their foods, emphasizing nutrients of current concern, such as vitamin D and potassium.[4] The revision to the regulations came into effect on 26 July 2016 and initially stipulated that larger manufacturers must comply within two years while smaller manufacturers had an additional year.[4][12][13] On May 4, 2018, the FDA released a final rule that extended the deadline to January 1, 2020, for large companies and to January 1, 2021, for small companies.[8] During the first six months following the January 1, 2020 compliance date, the FDA plans to work cooperatively with manufacturers to meet the new Nutrition Facts label requirements and will not focus on enforcement actions regarding these requirements during that time.[6] In the interim, products containing old or new facts panel content may be on market shelves at the same time.

Sodium

In 2010, the U.S. Institute of Medicine determined that the government should establish new consumption standards for salt to reduce the amount of sodium in the typical American diet below levels associated with higher risk of several cardiovascular diseases, yet maintain consumer preferences for salt-flavored food.[14] The daily maximum for sodium in the United States had been above estimated minimums for decades.[15] For instance, the National Research Council found that 500 milligrams of sodium per day (approximately 1,250 milligrams of table salt) is a safe minimum level.[16] In the United Kingdom, the daily allowance for salt is 6 g (approximately 2.5 teaspoons, about the upper limit in the U.S.), an amount considered "too high".[17][18]

The Institute of Medicine advisory stated (daily intake basis): "Americans consume more than 3,400 milligrams of sodium – the amount in about 1.5 teaspoons of salt (8.7 g) – each day. The recommended maximum daily intake of sodium – the amount above which health problems appear – is 2,300 milligrams per day for adults, about 1 teaspoon of salt (5.9 g). The recommended adequate intake of sodium is 1,500 milligrams (3.9 g salt) per day, and people over 50 need even less."[14]

gollark: poßibly.
gollark: I would, personally, like to be mostly generalist and not excessively tied to some particular industry/etc.
gollark: Anyway, I feel like specializing entirely in some esoteric computer science field is problematic.
gollark: And yes, you *have* summoned me, and you *may* regret it.
gollark: I am, in fact, always correct, especially regarding the badness of Golang.

See also

References
  1. "Nutrient content claims for 'good source', 'high', 'more', and 'high potency', Specific Requirements for Nutrient Content Claims. Food Labeling, Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Chapter I, Subchapter B, Part 101, Subpart D, Section 101.54". US Food and Drug Administration. April 1, 2017. Retrieved August 25, 2018.
  2. "Information for Consumers (Drugs)". U.S. Food and Drug Administration. October 29, 2008. Retrieved March 30, 2011. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  3. "Guidance for Industry: A Food Labeling Guide (14. Appendix F: Calculate the Percent Daily Value for the Appropriate Nutrients)". U.S. Food and Drug Administration. January 2013. Retrieved September 23, 2015. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  4. "Changes to the Nutrition Facts Label". FDA Labeling and Nutrition. United States Food and Drug Administration. May 20, 2016. Retrieved May 20, 2016.
  5. "Federal Register May 27, 2016 Food Labeling: Revision of the Nutrition and Supplement Facts Labels" (PDF). This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  6. "FDA provides information about dual columns on Nutrition Facts label". U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). December 30, 2019. Retrieved May 16, 2020. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  7. "Changes to the Nutrition Facts Label". U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). May 27, 2016. Retrieved May 16, 2020. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  8. "Food Labeling: Revision of the Nutrition and Supplement Facts Labels and Serving Sizes of Foods That Can Reasonably Be Consumed at One Eating Occasion; Dual-Column Labeling; Updating, Modifying, and Establishing Certain Reference Amounts Customarily Consumed; Serving Size for Breath Mints; and Technical Amendments; Extension of Compliance Dates". Federal Register. May 4, 2018. Retrieved May 19, 2020. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  9. "Table: DRI Values Summary" (PDF). Institute of Medicine. November 30, 2010. Retrieved March 11, 2018 – via National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. A complete document containing the four tables listed [at Dietary Reference Intakes Tables and Application: Health and Medicine Division].
  10. "Dietary Reference Intakes Tables and Application : Health and Medicine Division". nationalacademies.org. Retrieved March 11, 2018.
  11. "81 FR 33741".
  12. Institute of Medicine (2010). "2 History of Nutrition Labeling". Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols: Phase I Report. The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/12957.
  13. "Food Labeling: Revision of the Nutrition and Supplement Facts Labels". Federal Register. May 27, 2016. 81 FR 33741.
  14. "FDA should set standards for salt added to processed foods, prepared meals". U.S. National Academies of Science. April 20, 2010. Retrieved March 30, 2011.
  15. "Statement from the National High Blood Pressure Education Program". National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. October 14, 1999. Archived from the original on March 20, 2011. Retrieved March 30, 2011.
  16. "Recommended Dietary Allowances: 10th Edition". The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. Retrieved March 30, 2011.
  17. "Daily salt intake allowances 'were set too high'". BBC News. November 25, 2009. Retrieved March 30, 2011.
  18. "Britons told to cut salt intake". BBC News. September 13, 2004. Retrieved March 30, 2011.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.