Play-by-mail game

Play-by-mail games (also known as PBM games and turn-based games) are games played through postal mail, email or other digital media. Correspondence chess and Go are among the first PBM games. Diplomacy has been played by mail since 1963, introducing a multi-player aspect to PBM games.[2] Flying Buffalo Inc pioneered the first commercially available PBM game in 1970. A small number of PBM companies followed in the 1970s, with an explosion of hundreds of startup PBM companies in the 1980s at the peak of PBM gaming popularity, many of them small hobby companies—more than 90 percent of which eventually folded. A number of independent PBM magazines also started in the 1980s, including Flagship magazine, Gaming Universal, and Paper Mayhem. These magazines eventually went out of print, replaced in the 21st century by the online PBM journal Suspense and Decision.

Play-by-mail game The Land of Karrus, as portrayed in Paper Mayhem magazine.[1]

Play-by-mail games have a number of advantages and disadvantages related to other gaming genres. PBM games allow plenty of time—sometimes days or weeks—to consider moves or turns and players never run out of opponents to face. And if desired, various PBM games can be played for years.[3] Additionally, the complexity of PBM games can be far beyond that allowed by a board game in an afternoon, and pits players against live opponents in these conditions, a challenge some players enjoy. Some games allow the number of opponents or teams in the dozens, even as high as fifty. PBM games also allow gamers to interact with others globally. And games with low turn costs compare well with expensive board or video games. Some drawbacks include the price for some PBM games with high setup and/or turn costs, and the lack of ability for face-to-face roleplaying. Additionally, for some players, certain games can be overly complex, and delays in turn processing can be a negative.

Play-by-mail games are multifaceted. In their earliest form they involved two players alternatively sending moves directly to each other by postal mail, such as in correspondence chess. Multi-player games, such as Diplomacy or more complex games available today, involve a game master who receives, processes, and adjudicates turn results for players. These games also introduce the element of diplomacy in which participants can discuss gameplay with each other, strategize, and form alliances. In the 1970s and 1980s, turn results were sometimes adjudicated completely by humans. Over time, partial or complete turn adjudication by computer became the norm. Games also involve open and closed end variants. Open ended games do not end and players can develop their positions to the fullest extent possible, whereas in closed end games, players typically pursue a set of victory conditions until game conclusion. Finally, PBM games enable players to explore a diverse array of roles, from characters in fantasy or medieval settings, space operas, inner city gangs, or even more unusual ones such as assuming the role of microorganisms or monsters.

History
Postcard for international correspondence chess

The earliest play-by-mail games developed as a way for geographically separated gamers to compete with each other using postal mail. Chess and Go are among the oldest examples of this type. In these two player games, players send moves directly to each other. Multi-player games emerged later. Diplomacy is an example of this type in which a central game master manages the game, receiving moves and publishing adjudications. Diplomacy was first played by mail in 1963.[2] In the early 1970s, in the United States, Rick Loomis, of Flying Buffalo Inc, began a number of multi-player play-by-mail games;[4] this included games such as Nuclear Destruction, which launched in 1970.[5]

"[Rick Loomis] is generally recognized as the founder of the PBM industry."

— The Editors of Space Gamer Magazine, 1985.[6]

This began the professional PBM industry in the United States.[7] Professional game moderation started in 1971 at Flying Buffalo which added games such as Battleplan, Heroic Fantasy, Starweb, and others, which by the late 1980s were all computer moderated.[8][lower-alpha 1] For approximately five years, Flying Buffalo was the single dominant company in the US PBM industry until Schubel & Son entered the field in "roughly" 1976 with the human-moderated Tribes of Crane game.[8] Schubel & Son introduced fee structure innovations which allowed players to pay additional fees for additional options or special actions outside of the rules. This provided players with larger bankrolls the advantage or the ability to abuse game systems.[8]

The next "big entrance" was Superior Simulations with its game Empyrean Challenge in 1978.[8] Reviewer Jim Townsend asserted that it was "the most complex game system on Earth" with some large position turn results 1,000 pages in length.[8] By 1980, the PBM field was growing but still nascent: there were still only two sizable commercial PBM companies, and only a few small ones.[10] The most popular games of 1980 were Starweb and Tribes of Crane.[10]

Some players, unhappy with their experiences with Schubel & Son and Superior Simulations, launched their own company—Adventures by Mail—with game, Beyond the Stellar Empire, which became "immensely popular".[8] In this same way, many people have launched PBM companies, trying their hand at finding the right mix of action and strategy for the gaming audience of the period. According to Jim Townsend:

In the late 70's and all of the 80's, many small PBM firms have opened their doors and better than 90% of them have failed. Although PBM is an easy industry to get into, staying in business is another thing entirely. Literally hundreds of PBM companies have come and gone, most of them taking the money of would-be-customers with them.[8]

Townsend emphasized the risks for the PBM industry in that "The new PBM company has such a small chance of surviving that no insurance company would write a policy to cover them. Skydivers are a better risk."[11] By the late 1980s, of the more than one hundred play-by-mail companies operating, the majority were hobbies–not run as businesses to make money.[12] Jim Townsend estimated that, in 1988, there were about a dozen profitable PBM companies in the United States—with an additional few in the United Kingdom and the same in Australia.[12]

The proliferation of PBM companies in the 1980s supported the publication of a number of newsletters from individual play-by-mail companies as well as independent publications which focused solely on the play-by-mail gaming industry such as the relatively short-lived The Nuts & Bolts of PBM and Gaming Universal. The PBM genre's "two preeminent magazines" of the period were Flagship and Paper Mayhem.[13] Also in the mid-1980s, "general gaming magazines" began carrying articles on PBM and run PBM advertisements, and the Origins Awards began a "Best PBM Game" category.[14]

The 1990s brought changes to the PBM world. In the early 1990s, email became an option to transmit turn orders and results.[15] Modern PBM game turnaround times now have wide enough ranges that commenters are beginning to use the term "turn-based games".[16]

In the early 1990s, the PBM industry still maintained some of the player momentum from the 1980s. For example, in 1993, Flagship magazine listed 185 active play-by-mail games.[17] However, in 1994, David Webber, Paper Mayhem's editor in chief expressed concern about disappointing growth in the PBM community and a reduction in play by established gamers.[18] At the same time, he noted that his analysis indicated that "more and more PBMers are playing fewer games", giving the example of an average drop from 5–6 games per player to 2–3 games, suggesting it could be due to financial reasons.[19] However, in early 1997, David Webber stated that multiple PBM game moderators had noted a drop in players over the previous year.[20]

By the end of the 1990s, the number of PBM publications had also declined. Gaming Universal's final publication run ended in 1988.[21] Paper Mayhem ceased publication unexpectedly in early 1998 after Webber's death.[22] Flagship also later ceased publication.[23][lower-alpha 2] In the 21st century, a single PBM magazine exists—Suspense and Decision—which began publication in November 2013. This online magazine is supported by a smaller PBM community than in previous decades.[26]

Advantages and disadvantages of PBM gaming

Judith Proctor noted that play-by-mail games have a number of advantages. These include (1) plenty of time—potentially days—to plan a move, (2) never lacking players to face who have "new tactics and ideas", (3) the ability to play an "incredibly complex" game against live opponents, (4) meeting diverse gamers from far-away locations, and (5) relatively low costs.[27] Related to costs, Rick McDowell, designer of Alamaze, compared PBM costs favorably in 2019 with the high cost of board games at Barnes & Noble, with many going "for around $70", and a top rated game, Nemesis, costing $189.[28] Andrew Greenberg also pointed to the number of players possible in a multi-player game ("as many as fifty teams"), comparing it to his past failure at once trying to host an eleven-player Dungeons and Dragons Game.[29]

Greenberg identified a number of drawbacks for play-by-mail games. He stated that the "most obvious" was the cost, because most games require a setup cost and a fee per turn, and some games can become expensive.[29] Another drawback is the lack of face-to-face roleplaying inherent in play-by-mail games.[29] Finally, game complexity in some cases and occasional delays in turn processing can also be negatives in the genre.[29]

Description

In 1993, Paper Mayhem—a magazine for play-by-mail gamers—described play-by-mail games thusly:

PBM Games vary in the size of the games, turn around time, length of time a game lasts, and prices. An average PBM game has 10–20 players in it, but there are also games that have hundreds of players. Turn around time is the length of time it takes to get your turn back from a company. The average turnaround time is 2 weeks. Some games never end. They can go on virtually forever or until you decide to drop. Many games have victory conditions that can be achieved within a year or two. Prices vary for the different PBM games, but the average price per turn [in 1993] is about $5.00.[30]

Mechanics
Example player orders in email format for a turn in the game Hyborian War.

After the initial setup of a PBM game, players begin submitting turn orders. In general, players fill out a turn sheet for a game and mail it back to the gaming company.[30] The company processes the turns and sends back turns sheets to the players so they can make subsequent moves.[30]

R. Danard further separates a typical PBM turn into four parts. First, the company informs players on the results of the last turn. Next players conduct diplomatic activities, if desired. Then, they send their next turn sheets to the gamemaster (GM). Finally, the turn sheets are processed and the cycle is repeated. This continues until the game or a player is done.[31]

Diplomacy

According to Paper Mayhem assistant editor Jim Townsend,

The most important aspect of PBM games is the diplomacy. If you don't communicate with the other players you will be labeled a "loner," "mute," or just plain "dead meat." You must talk with the others to survive.[32]

Player roles

Play-by-mail games provide a wide array of possible roles to play, from pirates to space characters to "previously unknown creatures".[33] In the game Monster Island, players assume the role of a monster which explores a massive island.[34] And the title of the PBM game You're An Amoeba, GO! indicates an unusual role as players struggle "in a 3D pool of primordial ooze [directing] the evolution of a legion of micro-organisms".[35] Loth advises that closer identification with a role increases enjoyment, but a higher importance of this aspect requires more time searching for the right PBM game.[33]

Closed versus open ended

According to John Kevin Loth III, "In theory, an open ended game lasts forever" and there is no "ultimate goal" or way to win the game.[33] In open ended games, the designer has provided a system that enables players to develop with no upper limit. A drawback of this type is that mature games have "factions of significant power and knowledge" that can pose an unmanageable problem for the beginner—although some may see this situation as a challenge of sorts.[33] Examples of open ended games are Heroic Fantasy,[36] Monster Island,[37] and SuperNova: Rise of the Empire.[38]

Loth states that most players in closed end games start equally and the games are "faster paced, usually more intense...presenting frequent player confrontation; [and] the game terminates when a player or alliance of players has achieved specific conditions or eliminated all opposition".[33] Examples of closed end games are Hyborian War, It's a Crime, and Starweb.

Computer versus human moderated

In the 1980s, play-by-mail gaming companies began leveraging computers to moderate games. To some degree this was an economic decision, as computers allowed the processing of more turns than humans, but with less of a human touch in the prose of a turn result. According to John Kevin Loth III, 100 percent computer moderated games would also kill a player's "character or empire" emotionlessly, regardless of effort invested.[33] Alternatively, Loth noted that those preferring exquisite pages of prose would gravitate toward 100 percent human moderation.[33] Loth provided Beyond the Quadra Zone and Earthwood as popular computer moderated examples in 1986 and Silverdawn and Sword Lords as 100 percent human moderated examples of the period.[33]

Complexity

According to John Kevin Loth, "Novices should appreciate that some games are best played by veterans."[33] He noted in 1986 that Midguard was a "very complex game" with a 100-page instruction manual and "255 possible line entries".[33][8] Reviewer Jim Townsend asserted that Empyrean Challenge was "the most complex game system on Earth".[8] Other games, like Galactic Prisoners began simply and gradually increased in complexity.[33]

Cost and turn processing time

Loth noted that, in 1986, $3–5 per turn was the most prevalent cost.[39] At the time, some games were free, while some cost as much as $100 per turn.[39]

Play-by-mail magazine Paper Mayhem stated that the average turn processing time in 1987 was two weeks, and Loth noted that this was also the most popular.[40][39] In 1986, play-by-email was a nascent service only being offered by the largest PBM companies.[39]

Information sources

Rick Loomis of Flying Buffalo Games stated in 1985 that the Nuts & Bolts of PBM (first called Nuts & Bolts of Starweb) was the first PBM magazine not published by a PBM company.[41] The name changed to Nuts & Bolts of Gaming[41] and it eventually went out of print.

John Kevin Loth stated that, in 1986, the "three major information sources in PBM" were Paper Mayhem, Flagship Magazine, and the Play By Mail Association.[39] These sources were solely focused on play-by-mail gaming. Additional PBM information sources included company-specific publications, although Rick Loomis stated that these were "of interest only to their own customers".[41] Finally, play-by-mail gamers could also draw from "alliances, associations, and senior players" for information.[39]

In the mid-1980s, "general gaming magazines" also began venturing into PBM.[42] For example, White Wolf Magazine began a regular PBM column beginning in issue #11 as well as publishing an annual PBM issue beginning with issue #16.[43][44] The Space Gamer also carried PBM articles and reviews.[42] Additional minor information sources included magazines such as "Different Worlds, Dragon, Game New, Imagine, and White Dwarf".[39]

Flagship Magazine ran into the 21st Century, but ceased publication in 2010. In November 2013, an online journal for play-by-mail games, Suspense and Decision, began publication.[45]

Fiction

Besides articles and reviews on PBM games, authors have also published PBM fiction.[46]

gollark: Ah, it's in Data.List.
gollark: Also, tails does not exist.
gollark: No, that's me!
gollark: Someone is backwards too.
gollark: <@236831708354314240>

See also

Notes
  1. John W. Kelly, Jr. and Mike Scheid also noted that Jim Dutton "decided to write a short story for each turn and the narrative game was born".[9] Kelley and Scheid did not identify the timeframe or what company Dutton worked for.
  2. Charles Mosteller, the editor in chief of Suspense and Decision, noted in its November 2013 inaugural issue that Flagship's final issue had been previously published without providing a date.[24] Flagship magazine's webpage lists its most recent issue (No. 130) with a copyright date of 2010.[25]

References
  1. Paper Mayhem 1997. p. 27.
  2. Babcock 2013. p. 16.
  3. Procter 1993. p. 51.
  4. Loomis 2013. p. 38.
  5. Flying Buffalo 2020.
  6. The Editors 1985. p. 35.
  7. Mclain 1993.
  8. Townsend 1988. p. 20.
  9. Kelley and Scheid 1985. p. 26.
  10. Popolizio, Leblanc, and Popolizio 1990. p. 8.
  11. Townsend 1989. p. 55.
  12. Townsend 1988. p. 19.
  13. Paduch 1993. p. RC21.
  14. Loomis 1985. p. 35.
  15. Paduch 1993 p. 2
  16. Mosteller 2014. p. 76.
  17. Procter 1993. p. 51.
  18. Webber 1994 p. 2
  19. Webber 1994. p. 2.
  20. Webber 1997. p. 4.
  21. Webber 1988 p. 2
  22. Muir 2013. p. 14
  23. Mosteller 2014 p. 29
  24. Mosteller 2014 p. 29
  25. Flagship 2011; Flagship 2010 p. 3
  26. Mosteller 2014 p. 33
  27. Procter 1993. p. 51.
  28. McDowell 2019. p. 42.
  29. Greenberg 1993. p. 8–9.
  30. Paper Mayhem Jan/Feb 1993. p. 1.
  31. danard.net 2020.
  32. Townsend 1987. p. 29.
  33. John Kevin Loth III 1986. p. 42.
  34. Helzer 1993. p. 12.
  35. Paper Mayhem 1994. p. 42.
  36. Townsend 1987. p. 24.
  37. DuBois 1997. p. 4.
  38. Suspense & Decision 2019. pp. 35–40.
  39. John Kevin Loth III 1986. p. 43.
  40. Paper Mayhem Sep/Oct 1987. p. 1.
  41. Loomis 1985. p. 36.
  42. Loomis 1985. p. 35.
  43. White Wolf 1988. p. 2.
  44. White Wolf 1989. p. 1.
  45. Suspense & Decision 2013.
  46. Muir 1994. p. 29–30.

Bibliography
  • Babcock, Chris (December 2013). "Diplomacy" (PDF). Suspense and Decision. No. 2. p. 16. Retrieved March 20, 2020.
  • "Contents". White Wolf Magazine. No. 11. White Wolf Publishing. 1988. p. 2.
  • "Credits". White Wolf Magazine. No. 16. White Wolf Publishing. June–July 1989. p. 1.
  • DuBois, Steven (January–February 1997). "Monster Island: A Review". Paper Mayhem. No. 82. p. 4.
  • Editors (July–August 1985). "Rick Loomis on Play-By-Mail [Editor Intro]". The Space Gamer. No. #75. p. 35.CS1 maint: extra text: authors list (link)
  • "Flagship: The Independent Magazine for Gamers; Issue 130 PDF". Skeletal Software Ltd. 2007–2011. Retrieved July 7, 2020.
  • "[Front matter]". Paper Mayhem. No. 26. September–October 1987. p. 1.
  • Greenberg, Andrew (May–June 1993). "PBM Corner: A Beginning in Play-By-Mail; Is it Worth It?". White Wolf Magazine. No. 36. pp. 8–9.
  • Helzer, Herb (January–February 1993). "Monster Island: Just One Destination for PBM Company". Paper Mayhem. No. 58. p. 12.
  • Kelly, Jr, John W.; Scheid, Mike (May–June 1985). "Prehistoric PBM: First World in Review". Paper Mayhem. No. 12. p. 26.
  • Loomis, Rick (July–August 1985). "Rick Loomis on Play-By-Mail". The Space Gamer. No. #75. pp. 35–36.
  • Loomis, Rick (May 1999). "The History of Play-by-Mail and Flying Buffalo" (PDF). Flying Buffalo Quarterly. No. 79. pp. 2–5. Retrieved April 17, 2020.
  • Loomis, Rick (December 2013). "Letter from Rick Loomis to the Play By Mail/Email/Web/Turn Based Games Community" (PDF). Suspense and Decision. No. 2. The Paper Mayhem Association. p. 38. Retrieved March 20, 2020.
  • Loth III, John Kevin (March–April 1986). "A PBM Primer". Paper Mayhem. No. 17. p. 42.
  • Loth III, John Kevin (March–April 1986). "A PBM Primer". Paper Mayhem. No. 17. p. 43.
  • McDowell, Rick (August 2019). "Why Should We Care About PBM? Is the future of this hobby past?" (PDF). Suspense and Decision. No. 18. playbymail.net. pp. 42–43. Retrieved May 3, 2020.
  • McLain, Bob (August 1, 1993). "Play By Mail: The Infancy of Cyberspace". Pyramid. sjgames.com. Retrieved May 5, 2020.
  • Mosteller, Charles (June 2014). "An Open Invitation To the Player Base of Turn-Based Games" (PDF). Suspense and Decision. No. 8. p. 76. Retrieved May 30, 2020.
  • Mosteller, Charles (November 2013). "Hyborian War: A Mindblowing Experience?!" (PDF). Suspense and Decision. No. 1. PlayByMail.net. p. 24. Retrieved January 15, 2020.
  • Mulholland, Carol (2010). "In this issue... (Front matter)" (PDF). Flagship. No. 130. TimePatterns. p. 3. Retrieved July 7, 2020.
  • Mosteller, Charles (November 2013). "A Journey Together Awaits" (PDF). Suspense and Decision. No. 1. PlayByMail.net. pp. 29–34. Retrieved July 4, 2020.
  • Muir, Shannon (September–October 1994). "PBM Fiction: Why Write It, Why Read It, Who Needs It?". Paper Mayhem. No. 68. pp. 29–30.
  • Muir, Shannon (December 2013). "Using Play By Mail in a Novel's Plot: The Story Behind for the Love of Airagos" (PDF). Suspense and Decision. No. 5. Retrieved February 15, 2020.
  • Muir, Shannon; Muir, John C. (November 2001). "Thoughts on the Evolution of PBM". Sabledrake Magazine. Archived from the original on June 17, 2002. Retrieved April 19, 2010 – via Wayback Machine. Interview with John C. Muir, long-time PBM author.
  • "Nuclear Destruction". Flying Buffalo, Inc. Flying Buffalo, Inc. Retrieved March 27, 2020.
  • Paduch, Sally (June 27, 1993). "Email Brings Immediacy to Play-By-Mail Games". New York Times. p. RC21.
  • Popolizio, Mike; LeBlanc, Liz; Popolizio, Marti (January–February 1990). "Revamping a Classic! The Redesign of BSE". Paper Mayhem. No. 40. The Paper Mayhem Association. pp. 8–10.
  • Proctor, Judith (March–April 1993). "The PBM Corner". White Wolf Magazine. No. 35. p. 51.
  • R. Danard (2020). "Play-by-mail: Overview". jpc.danard.net. Retrieved April 4, 2020.
  • "Suspense and Decision Magazine: A PBM Magazine for the 21st Century!". www.playbymail.net. 2019. Retrieved January 21, 2020.
  • "Suspense and Decision Magazine: A PBM Magazine for the 21st Century!" (PDF). www.playbymail.net. November 2013. Retrieved April 4, 2020.
  • "The Land of Karrus [Advertisement]". Paper Mayhem. No. 85. The Paper Mayhem Association. July–August 1997. p. 27.
  • Townsend, Jim (January–February 1987). "How to Win in PBM—An Organizational Viewpoint". Paper Mayhem. No. 22. The Paper Mayhem Association. p. 29.
  • Townsend, Jim (March–April 1987). "A Real Look at Heroic Fantasy". Paper Mayhem. No. 23. p. 24.
  • Townsend, Jim (1988). "The PBM Corner". White Wolf Magazine. No. 11. p. 20.
  • Townsend, Jim (1988). "The PBM Corner". White Wolf Magazine. No. 12. p. 19.
  • Townsend, Jim (February 1989). "The PBM Corner". White Wolf Magazine. No. 14. p. 55.
  • Paper Mayhem (January–February 1993). "Front Matter". Paper Mayhem. No. 58. p. 1.
  • Proctor, Judith (March–April 1993). "PBM Corner: Not Just for a Dull Evening". White Wolf Magazine. No. 35. p. 51.
  • Webber, David (March–April 1988). "Where We're Headed". Paper Mayhem. No. 29. p. 2.
  • Webber, David (Mar–Apr 1994). "Where We're Headed". Paper Mayhem. No. 65. p. 2.
  • Webber, David (March–April 1997). "Where We're Heading...". Paper Mayhem. No. 83. p. 4.
  • "You're An Amoeba, GO! [Advertisement]". Paper Mayhem. No. 68. September–October 1994. p. 42.
  • Zachary, Raven (September 2019). "Be More than a Player: Learning by Teaching in SuperNova & Middle-earth" (PDF). Suspense and Decision. No. 19. playbymail.net. pp. 35–40. Retrieved April 4, 2020.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.