Orion 3

Orion 3 was an American spacecraft which was intended for use by Orion Network Systems, as a geostationary communications satellite. It was to have been positioned in geostationary orbit at a longitude of 139° East, from where it was to have provided communications services to Asia and Oceania.[2] Due to a malfunction during launch, it was instead delivered to a useless low Earth orbit.

This article is about the satellite. For the cancelled Constellation mission, see List of Constellation missions.
Orion 3
Mission typeCommunication
OperatorLoral
COSPAR ID1999-024A
SATCAT no.25727
Mission duration15 years (planned)
Launch failure
Spacecraft properties
BusHS-601HP
ManufacturerHughes
Launch mass4,300 kilograms (9,500 lb)
Start of mission
Launch date5 May 1999, 01:00:00 (1999-05-05UTC01Z) UTC
RocketDelta III 8930
Launch siteCape Canaveral SLC-17B
ContractorBoeing
Orbital parameters
Reference systemGeocentric
RegimeGeostationary (planned)
Low Earth (achieved)
Longitude139° East (planned)
Perigee altitude421 kilometres (262 mi)
Apogee altitude1,317 kilometres (818 mi)
Inclination29.0 degrees
Period102.3 minutes
Epoch4 March 1999, 21:00:00 UTC[1]
Transponders
Band10 G/H band
33 J band
 

Orion 3 was constructed by Hughes Space and Communications, based on an HS-601HP satellite bus. It was equipped with 10 G/H band (IEEE C band) and 33 J band (IEEE Ku band) transponders, and at launch it had a mass of 4,300 kilograms (9,500 lb). The satellite was expected to remain operational for around fifteen years.[3] Orion Network Systems merged with Loral Space & Communications in 1999 after the Orion 3 launch failure.

Launch

The Orion 3 satellite was launched on the second flight of the Delta III rocket, using the standard 8930 configuration. The launch occurred from Space Launch Complex 17B at the Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, at 01:00:00 GMT on 5 May 1999.[4] The first stage and solid rocket motors performed as expected, and the first burn of the second stage was conducted as planned, injecting the spacecraft into low Earth orbit. Following this, the rocket entered a coast phase, before the second stage restarted for what was planned to be a 162-second burn to insert Orion 3 into a geosynchronous transfer orbit.[5] Around 3.4 seconds after igniting, the RL-10-B-2 engine of the second stage cut off after a malfunction was detected, leaving the spacecraft in an orbit of around 160 by 1,284 kilometres (99 mi × 798 mi), with 29.5° inclination.[6] It was the second failure of an RL-10 powered rocket in less than a week, after the Centaur upper stage of a Titan IV rocket failed during the launch of USA-143 on 30 April,[4] although this incident was later attributed to a programming error.[5]

An investigation later determined that the failure of Orion 3's launch was due to the wall of the RL-10 combustion chamber being breached. The investigation found that it was likely that the breach in the chamber was along one of the seams where the chamber had been soldered. On this engine, one of those seams had failed during a static firing, and despite subsequent repair, it was suspected that the same seam had failed again.[5]

The orbit of the Orion 3 satellite was raised slightly, and its inclination reduced, using onboard propulsion.[6] It was left in an orbit with a perigee of 421 kilometres (262 mi), an apogee of 1,317 kilometres (818 mi), and 29° inclination.[6] Its operators received US$247 million in insurance for the loss of the satellite, which was turned over to its insurers.[5] The insurers considered asking NASA to fly a Space Shuttle mission to attach a solid rocket motor to the satellite, which would have been used to correct its orbit. The Shuttle mission would have been similar to STS-49, which reboosted Intelsat 603 following the failure of its launch on a Commercial Titan III. Unlike with Intelsat 603, however, Orion 3 would have needed to perform a Lunar flyby to reduce inclination.[7] NASA considered attaching cameras and a scientific payload to the satellite for the flyby,[7] however reboosting the satellite was subsequently deemed to not be sufficiently cost-effective, and Orion 3 was abandoned.[5]

gollark: Our storage backend is fog, not clouds. Much cheaper and lower latency.
gollark: Post them in the osmarks.net comment system as base64.
gollark: Is it for the feed thing or what?
gollark: What was the intended purpose?
gollark: I don't understand what you'd actually do with that.

See also

References
  1. "NASA - NSSDCA - Spacecraft - Trajectory Details". nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov. Retrieved 2018-05-02.
  2. "Orion 3". Boeing Integrated Defense Systems. Retrieved 2009-08-08.
  3. Krebs, Gunter. "Orion 3". Gunter's Space Page. Retrieved 2009-08-08.
  4. McDowell, Jonathan. "Launch Log". Jonathan's Space Page. Retrieved 2009-08-08.
  5. Harland, David M; Lorenz, Ralph D. (2005). Space Systems Failures (2006 ed.). Chichester: Springer-Praxis. ISBN 0-387-21519-0.
  6. McDowell, Jonathan. "Satellite Catalog". Jonathan's Space Page. Retrieved 2009-08-08.
  7. Bridges, Andrew (2000-05-28). "NASA Plans Orion 3 Rescue". Space.com. Archived from the original on 2009-05-24. Retrieved 2009-08-08.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.