Optical rotation

Optical rotation, also known as polarization rotation or circular birefringence, is the rotation of the orientation of the plane of polarization about the optical axis of linearly polarized light as it travels through certain materials. Circular birefringence and circular dichroism are the manifestations of optical activity. Optical activity occurs only in chiral materials, those lacking microscopic mirror symmetry. Unlike other sources of birefringence which alter a beam's state of polarization, optical activity can be observed in fluids. This can include gases or solutions of chiral molecules such as sugars, molecules with helical secondary structure such as some proteins, and also chiral liquid crystals. It can also be observed in chiral solids such as certain crystals with a rotation between adjacent crystal planes (such as quartz) or metamaterials.

1. Light source 2. Unpolarized light 3. Polarizer 4. Polarized light 5. Sample tube containing organic molecules 6. 30° optical rotation 7. Movable analyzer 8. Observer

The rotation of the plane of polarization may be either clockwise, to the right (dextrorotary — d-rotary), or to the left (levorotary — l-rotary) depending on which stereoisomer is present (or dominant). For instance, sucrose and camphor are d-rotary whereas cholesterol is l-rotary. For a given substance, the angle by which the polarization of light of a specified wavelength is rotated is proportional to the path length through the material and (for a solution) proportional to its concentration.

Optical activity is measured using a polarized source and polarimeter. This is a tool particularly used in the sugar industry to measure the sugar concentration of syrup, and generally in chemistry to measure the concentration or enantiomeric ratio of chiral molecules in solution. Modulation of a liquid crystal's optical activity, viewed between two sheet polarizers, is the principle of operation of liquid-crystal displays (used in most modern televisions and computer monitors).

Comparison to the Faraday effect

Rotation of light's plane of polarization may also occur through the Faraday effect which involves a static magnetic field, however this is a distinct phenomenon that is not classified under "optical activity." Optical activity is reciprocal, i.e. it is the same for opposite directions of wave propagation through an optically active medium, for example clockwise polarization rotation from the point of view of an observer. In case of optically active isotropic media, the rotation is the same for any direction of wave propagation. In contrast, the Faraday effect is non-reciprocal, i.e opposite directions of wave propagation through a Faraday medium will result in clockwise and anti-clockwise polarization rotation from the point of view of an observer. Faraday rotation depends on the propagation direction relative to that of the applied magnetic field. All compounds can exhibit polarization rotation in the presence of an applied magnetic field, provided that (a component of) the magnetic field is oriented in the direction of light propagation. The Faraday effect is one of the first discoveries of the relationship between light and electromagnetic effects.

History

The two asymmetric crystal forms, dextrorotatory and levorotatory, of tartaric acid.

Sucrose solution concentration measuring experiment, demonstrating optical rotation.

The rotation of the orientation of linearly polarized light was first observed in 1811 in quartz by French physicist François Jean Dominique Arago.[1] In 1820, the English astronomer Sir John F.W. Herschel discovered that different individual quartz crystals, whose crystalline structures are mirror images of each other (see illustration), rotate linear polarization by equal amounts but in opposite directions.[2] Jean Baptiste Biot also observed the rotation of the axis of polarization in certain liquids[3] and vapors of organic substances such as turpentine.[4] Simple polarimeters have been used since this time to measure the concentrations of simple sugars, such as glucose, in solution. In fact one name for D-glucose (the biological isomer), is dextrose, referring to the fact that it causes linearly polarized light to rotate to the right or dexter side. In a similar manner, levulose, more commonly known as fructose, causes the plane of polarization to rotate to the left. Fructose is even more strongly levorotatory than glucose is dextrorotatory. Invert sugar syrup, commercially formed by the hydrolysis of sucrose syrup to a mixture of the component simple sugars, fructose, and glucose, gets its name from the fact that the conversion causes the direction of rotation to "invert" from right to left.

In 1849, Louis Pasteur resolved a problem concerning the nature of tartaric acid.[5] A solution of this compound derived from living things (to be specific, wine lees) rotates the plane of polarization of light passing through it, but tartaric acid derived by chemical synthesis has no such effect, even though its reactions are identical and its elemental composition is the same. Pasteur noticed that the crystals come in two asymmetric forms that are mirror images of one another. Sorting the crystals by hand gave two forms of the compound: Solutions of one form rotate polarized light clockwise, while the other form rotate light counterclockwise. An equal mix of the two has no polarizing effect on light. Pasteur deduced that the molecule in question is asymmetric and could exist in two different forms that resemble one another as would left- and right-hand gloves, and that the organic form of the compound consists of purely the one type.

In 1874, Jacobus Henricus van 't Hoff[6] and Joseph Achille Le Bel[7] independently proposed that this phenomenon of optical activity in carbon compounds could be explained by assuming that the 4 saturated chemical bonds between carbon atoms and their neighbors are directed towards the corners of a regular tetrahedron. If the 4 neighbors are all different, then there are two possible orderings of the neighbors around the tetrahedron, which will be mirror images of each other. This led to a better understanding of the three-dimensional nature of molecules.

In 1945, Charles William Bunn[8] predicted optical activity of achiral structures, if the wave's propgation direction and the achiral structure form an experimental arrangement that is different from its mirror image. Such optical activity due to extrinsic chirality was observed in the 1960s in liquid crystals.[9][10]

In 1950, Sergey Vavilov[11] predicted optical activity that depends on the intensity of light and the effect of nonlinear optical activity was observed in 1979 in lithium iodate crystals.[12]

Optical activity is normally observed for transmitted light, however, in 1988, M. P. Silverman discovered that polarization rotation can also occur for light reflected from chiral substances.[13] Shortly after, it was observed chiral media can also reflect left-handed and right-handed circularly polarized waves with different efficiencies.[14] These phenomena of specular circular birefringence and specular circular dichroism are jointly known as specular optical activity. Specular optical activity is very weak in natural materials.

In 1898 Jagadish Chandra Bose described the ability of twisted artificial structures to rotate the polarization of microwaves.[15] Since the early 21st century, the development of artificial materials has led to the prediction[16] and realization[17][18] of chiral metamaterials with optical activity exceeding that of natural media by orders of magnitude in the optical part of the spectrum. Extrinsic chirality associated with oblique illumination of metasurfaces lacking two-fold rotational symmetry has been observed to lead to large linear optical activity in transmission[19] and reflection[20], as well as nonlinear optical acitvity exceeding that of lithium iodate by 30 million times.[21]

Theory

Optical activity occurs due to molecules dissolved in a fluid or due to the fluid itself only if the molecules are one of two (or more) stereoisomers; this is known as an enantiomer. The structure of such a molecule is such that it is not identical to its mirror image (which would be that of a different stereoisomer, or the "opposite enantiomer"). In mathematics, this property is also known as chirality. For instance, a metal rod is not chiral, since its appearance in a mirror is not distinct from itself. However a screw or light bulb base (or any sort of helix) is chiral; an ordinary right-handed screw thread, viewed in a mirror, would appear as a left-handed screw (very uncommon) which could not possibly screw into an ordinary (right-handed) nut. A human viewed in a mirror would have their heart on the right side, clear evidence of chirality, whereas the mirror reflection of a doll might well be indistinguishable from the doll itself.

In order to display optical activity, a fluid must contain only one, or a preponderance of one, stereoisomer. If two enantiomers are present in equal proportions then their effects cancel out and no optical activity is observed; this is termed a racemic mixture. But when there is an enantiomeric excess, more of one enantiomer than the other, the cancellation is incomplete and optical activity is observed. Many naturally occurring molecules are present as only one enantiomer (such as many sugars). Chiral molecules produced within the fields of organic chemistry or inorganic chemistry are racemic unless a chiral reagent was employed in the same reaction.

At the fundamental level, polarization rotation in an optically active medium is caused by circular birefringence, and can best be understood in that way. Whereas linear birefringence in a crystal involves a small difference in the phase velocity of light of two different linear polarizations, circular birefringence implies a small difference in the velocities between right and left-handed circular polarizations. Think of one enantiomer in a solution as a large number of little helices (or screws), all right-handed, but in random orientations. Birefringence of this sort is possible even in a fluid because the handedness of the helices is not dependent on their orientation: even when the direction of one helix is reversed, it still appears right handed. And circularly polarized light itself is chiral: as the wave proceeds in one direction the electric (and magnetic) fields composing it are rotating clockwise (or counterclockwise for the opposite circular polarization), tracing out a right (or left) handed screw pattern in space. In addition to the bulk refractive index which substantially lowers the phase velocity of light in any dielectric (transparent) material compared to the speed of light (in vacuum), there is an additional interaction between the chirality of the wave and the chirality of the molecules. Where their chiralities are the same, there will be a small additional effect on the wave's velocity, but the opposite circular polarization will experience an opposite small effect as its chirality is opposite that of the molecules.

Unlike linear birefringence, however, natural optical rotation (in the absence of a magnetic field) cannot be explained in terms of a local material permittivity tensor (i.e., a charge response that only depends on the local electric field vector), as symmetry considerations forbid this. Rather, circular birefringence only appears when considering nonlocality of the material response, a phenomenon known as spatial dispersion.[22] Nonlocality means that electric fields in one location of the material drive currents in another location of the material. Light travels at a finite speed, and even though it is much faster than the electrons, it makes a difference whether the charge response naturally wants to travel along with the electromagnetic wavefront, or opposite to it. Spatial dispersion means that light travelling in different directions (different wavevectors) sees a slightly different permittivity tensor. Natural optical rotation requires a special material, but it also relies on the fact that the wavevector of light is nonzero, and a nonzero wavevector bypasses the symmetry restrictions on the local (zero-wavevector) response. However, there is still reversal symmetry, which is why the direction of natural optical rotation must be 'reversed' when the direction of the light is reversed, in contrast to magnetic Faraday rotation. All optical phenomena have some nonlocality/wavevector influence but it is usually negligible; natural optical rotation, rather uniquely, absolutely requires it.[22]

The phase velocity of light in a medium is commonly expressed using the index of refraction n, defined as the speed of light (in free space) divided by its speed in the medium. The difference in the refractive indices between the two circular polarizations quantifies the strength of the circular birefringence (polarization rotation),

${\displaystyle \Delta n=n_{RHC}-n_{LHC}\,}$.

While ${\displaystyle \Delta n}$ is small in natural materials, examples of giant circular birefringence resulting in a negative refractive index for one circular polarization have been reported for chiral metamaterials.[23] [24]

The familiar rotation of the axis of linear polarization relies on the understanding that a linearly polarized wave can as well be described as the superposition (addition) of a left and right circularly polarized wave in equal proportion. The phase difference between these two waves is dependent on the orientation of the linear polarization which we'll call ${\displaystyle \theta _{0}}$, and their electric fields have a relative phase difference of ${\displaystyle 2\theta _{0}}$ which then add to produce linear polarization:

${\displaystyle \mathbf {E} _{\theta _{0}}={\frac {\sqrt {2}}{2}}(e^{-i\theta _{0}}\mathbf {E} _{RHC}+e^{i\theta _{0}}\mathbf {E} _{LHC})\,\,,}$

where ${\displaystyle \mathbf {E} _{\theta _{0}}}$ is the electric field of the net wave, while ${\displaystyle \mathbf {E} _{RHC}}$ and ${\displaystyle \mathbf {E} _{LHC}}$ are the two circularly polarized basis functions (having zero phase difference). Assuming propagation in the +z direction, we could write ${\displaystyle \mathbf {E} _{RHC}}$ and ${\displaystyle \mathbf {E} _{LHC}}$ in terms of their x and y components as follows:

${\displaystyle \mathbf {E} _{RHC}={\frac {\sqrt {2}}{2}}({\hat {x}}+i{\hat {y}})}$

${\displaystyle \mathbf {E} _{LHC}={\frac {\sqrt {2}}{2}}({\hat {x}}-i{\hat {y}})}$

where ${\displaystyle {\hat {x}}}$ and ${\displaystyle {\hat {y}}}$ are unit vectors, and i is the imaginary unit, in this case representing the 90 degree phase shift between the x and y components that we have decomposed each circular polarization into. As usual when dealing with phasor notation, it is understood that such quantities are to be multiplied by ${\displaystyle e^{-i\omega t}}$ and then the actual electric field at any instant is given by the real part of that product.

Substituting these expressions for ${\displaystyle \mathbf {E} _{RHC}}$ and ${\displaystyle \mathbf {E} _{LHC}}$ into the equation for ${\displaystyle \mathbf {E} _{\theta _{0}}}$ we obtain:

${\displaystyle \mathbf {E} _{\theta _{0}}={\frac {\sqrt {2}}{2}}(e^{-i\theta _{0}}\mathbf {E} _{RHC}+e^{i\theta _{0}}\mathbf {E} _{LHC})\,\,}$

${\displaystyle ={\frac {1}{2}}({\hat {x}}(e^{-i\theta _{0}}+e^{i\theta _{0}})+{\hat {y}}i(e^{-i\theta _{0}}-e^{i\theta _{0}}))\,\,}$

${\displaystyle ={\hat {x}}\cos(\theta _{0})+{\hat {y}}\sin(\theta _{0})}$

The last equation shows that the resulting vector has the x and y components in phase and oriented exactly in the ${\displaystyle \theta _{0}}$ direction, as we had intended, justifying the representation of any linearly polarized state at angle ${\displaystyle \theta }$ as the superposition of right and left circularly polarized components with a relative phase difference of ${\displaystyle 2\theta }$. Now let us assume transmission through an optically active material which induces an additional phase difference between the right and left circularly polarized waves of ${\displaystyle 2\Delta \theta }$. Let us call ${\displaystyle \mathbf {E} _{out}}$ the result of passing the original wave linearly polarized at angle ${\displaystyle \theta }$ through this medium. This will apply additional phase factors of ${\displaystyle -\Delta \theta }$ and ${\displaystyle \Delta \theta }$ to the right and left circularly polarized components of ${\displaystyle \mathbf {E} _{\theta _{0}}}$:

${\displaystyle \mathbf {E} _{out}={\frac {\sqrt {2}}{2}}(e^{-i\Delta \theta }e^{-i\theta _{0}}\mathbf {E} _{RHC}+e^{i\Delta \theta }e^{i\theta _{0}}\mathbf {E} _{LHC})\,\,.}$

Using similar math as above we find:

${\displaystyle \mathbf {E} _{out}={\hat {x}}\cos(\theta _{0}+\Delta \theta )+{\hat {y}}\sin(\theta _{0}+\Delta \theta )}$

thus describing a wave linearly polarized at angle ${\displaystyle \theta _{0}+\Delta \theta }$, thus rotated by ${\displaystyle \Delta \theta }$ relative to the incoming wave :${\displaystyle \mathbf {E} _{\theta _{0}}}$

We defined above the difference in the refractive indices for right and left circularly polarized waves of ${\displaystyle \Delta n}$. Considering propagation through a length L in such a material, there will be an additional phase difference induced between them of ${\displaystyle 2\Delta \theta }$ (as we used above) given by:

${\displaystyle 2\Delta \theta ={\frac {\Delta nL2\pi }{\lambda }}}$,

where ${\displaystyle \lambda }$ is the wavelength of the light (in vacuum). This will cause a rotation of the linear axis of polarization by ${\displaystyle \Delta \theta }$ as we have shown.

In general, the refractive index depends on wavelength (see dispersion) and the differential refractive index ${\displaystyle \Delta n}$ will also be wavelength dependent. The resulting variation in rotation with the wavelength of the light is called optical rotatory dispersion (ORD). ORD spectra and circular dichroism spectra are related through the Kramers–Kronig relations. Complete knowledge of one spectrum allows the calculation of the other.

So we find that the degree of rotation depends on the color of the light (the yellow sodium D line near 589 nm wavelength is commonly used for measurements), and is directly proportional to the path length ${\displaystyle L}$ through the substance and the amount of circular birefringence of the material ${\displaystyle \Delta n}$ which, for a solution, may be computed from the substance's specific rotation and its concentration in solution.

Although optical activity is normally thought of as a property of fluids, particularly aqueous solutions, it has also been observed in crystals such as quartz (SiO₂). Although quartz has a substantial linear birefringence, that effect is cancelled when propagation is along the optic axis. In that case, rotation of the plane of polarization is observed due to the relative rotation between crystal planes, thus making the crystal formally chiral as we have defined it above. The rotation of the crystal planes can be right or left-handed, again producing opposite optical activities. On the other hand, amorphous forms of silica such as fused quartz, like a racemic mixture of chiral molecules, has no net optical activity since one or the other crystal structure does not dominate the substance's internal molecular structure.

Areas of use

For a pure substance in solution, if the color and path length are fixed and the specific rotation is known, the observed rotation can be used to calculate the concentration. This usage makes a polarimeter a tool of great importance to those trading in or using sugar syrups in bulk.

See also

• Cryptochirality
• Specific rotation
• Circular dichroism
• Birefringence
• Geometric phase
• Polarization
• Levorotation and dextrorotation
• Chirality (chemistry)
• Chirality (electromagnetism)
• Polarization rotator
• Hyper Rayleigh Scattering Optical Activity
• Raman optical activity (ROA)

References

1. Arago (1811) "Mémoire sur une modification remarquable qu'éprouvent les rayons lumineux dans leur passage à travers certains corps diaphanes et sur quelques autres nouveaux phénomènes d'optique" (Memoir on a remarkable modification that light rays experience during their passage through certain translucent substances and on some other new optical phenomena), Mémoires de la classe des sciences mathématiques et physiques de l'Institut Impérial de France, 1st part : 93–134.
2. Herschel, J.F.W. (1820) "On the rotation impressed by plates of rock crystal on the planes of polarization of the rays of light, as connected with certain peculiarities in its crystallization," Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 1 : 43–51.
3. Biot, J. B. (1815) "Phenomene de polarisation successive, observés dans des fluides homogenes" (Phenomenon of successive polarization, observed in homogeneous fluids), Bulletin des Sciences, par la Société Philomatique de Paris, 190–192.
4. Biot (1818 & 1819) "Extrait d'un mémoire sur les rotations que certaines substances impriment aux axes de polarisation des rayons lumineux" (Extract from a memoir on the [optical] rotations that certain substances impress on the axes of polarization of light rays), Annales de Chimie et de Physique, 2nd series, 9 : 372-389 ; 10 : 63-81 ; for Biot's experiments with turpentine vapor (vapeur d'essence de térébenthine), see pp. 72-81.
5. Pasteur, L. (1850) "Recherches sur les propriétés spécifiques des deux acides qui composent l'acide racémique" (Researches on the specific properties of the two acids that compose the racemic acid), Annales de chimie et de physique, 3rd series, 28 : 56–99 ; see also appendix, pp. 99–117.
6. van 't Hoff, J.H. (1874) "Sur les formules de structure dans l'espace" (On structural formulas in space), Archives Néerlandaises des Sciences Exactes et Naturelles, 9 : 445–454.
7. Le Bel, J.-A. (1874) "Sur les relations qui existent entre les formules atomiques des corps organiques et le pouvoir rotatoire de leurs dissolutions" (On the relations that exist between the atomic formulas of organic substances and the rotatory power of their solutions), Bulletin de la Société Chimique de Paris, 22 : 337–347.
8. Bunn, C. W. (1945). Chemical Crystallography. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 88.
9. R. Williams (1968). "Optical Rotatory Effect in the Nematic Liquid Phase of p-Azoxyanisole". Physical Review Letters. 21: 342. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.21.342.
10. R. Williams (1969). "Optical-rotary power and linear electro-optic effect in nematic liquid crystals of p-azoxyanisole". Journal of Chemical Physics. 50: 1324. doi:10.1063/1.1671194.
11. Vavilov, S. I. (1950). Mikrostruktura Sveta (Microstructure of Light). Moscow: USSR Academy of Sciences Publishing.
12. Akhmanov, S. A.; Zhdanov, B. V.; Zheludev, N. I.; Kovrigin, A. I.; Kuznetsov, V. I. (1979). "Nonlinear optical activity in crystals". JETP Letters. 29: 264.
13. Silverman, M.; Ritchie, N.; Cushman, G.; Fisher, B. (1988). "Experimental configurations using optical phase modulation to measure chiral asymmetries in light specularly reflected from a naturally gyrotropic medium". Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 5: 1852. doi:10.1364/JOSAA.5.001852.
14. Silverman, M.; Badoz, J.; Briat, B. (1992). "Chiral reflection from a naturally optically active medium". Optics Letters. 17: 886. doi:10.1364/OL.17.000886.
15. Bose, Jagadis Chunder (1898). "On the Rotation of Plane of Polarisation of Electric Waves by a Twisted Structure". Proceedings of the Royal Society. 63 (389–400): 146–152. doi:10.1098/rspl.1898.0019. JSTOR 115973.
16. Svirko, Y.; Zheludev, N. I.; Osipov, M. (2001). "Layered chiral metallic microstructures with inductive coupling". Applied Physics Letters. 78: 498. doi:10.1063/1.1342210.
17. Kuwata-Gonokami, M.; Saito, N.; Ino, Y.; Kauranen, M.; Jefimovs, K.; Vallius, T.; Turunen, J.; Svirko, Y. (2005). "Giant Optical Activity in Quasi-Two-Dimensional Planar Nanostructures". Physical Review Letters. 95: 227401. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.227401.
18. Plum, E.; Fedotov, V. A.; Schwanecke, A. S.; Zheludev, N. I.; Chen, Y. (2007). "Giant optical gyrotropy due to electromagnetic coupling". Applied Physics Letters. 90: 223113. doi:10.1063/1.2745203.
19. Plum, E.; Fedotov, V. A.; Zheludev, N. I. (2008). "Optical activity in extrinsically chiral metamaterial". Applied Physics Letters. 93: 191911. doi:10.1063/1.3021082.
20. Plum, E.; Fedotov, V. A.; Zheludev, N. I. (2016). "Specular optical activity of achiral metasurfaces". Applied Physics Letters. 108: 141905. doi:10.1063/1.4944775.
21. Ren, M.; Plum, E.; Xu, J.; Zheludev, N. I. (2012). "Giant nonlinear optical activity in a plasmonic metamaterial". Nature Communications. 3: 833. doi:10.1038/ncomms1805.
22. L.D. Landau; E.M. Lifshitz; L.P. Pitaevskii (1984). Electrodynamics of Continuous Media. 8 (2nd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann. pp. 362–365. ISBN 978-0-7506-2634-7.
23. Plum, E.; Zhou, J.; Dong, J.; Fedotov, V. A.; Koschny, T.; Soukoulis, C. M.; Zheludev, N. I. (2009). "Metamaterial with negative index due to chirality". Physical Review B. 79: 035407. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.79.035407.
24. Zhang, S.; Park, Y.-S.; Li, J.; Lu, X.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, X. (2009). "Negative Refractive Index in Chiral Metamaterials". Physical Review Letters. 102: 023901. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.023901.

Further reading

• Eugene Hecht, Optics, 3rd Ed., Addison-Wesley, 1998, ISBN 0-201-30425-2
• Akhlesh Lakhtakia, Beltrami Fields in Chiral Media, World Scientific, Singapore, 1994
• A step by step tutorial on Optical Rotation
• Morrison. Robert. T, and Boyd. Robert. N, "Organic Chemistry (6th ed)". Prentice-Hall Inc (1992).